The Iowa orthopaedic journal最新文献

Background: Many cancers metastasize to bone and may lead to pathologic fracture or impending pathologic fracture. Prophylactically stabilizing bones before fracture has been shown to be more cost-effective with improved outcomes. Many studies have examined risk factors for pathological fracture, with radiographic and functional pain data serving as predominant indicators for surgery. Conditions associated with poor bone health and increased risk of fracture in the non-oncologic population, including diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease, renal disease, smoking, corticosteroid use, and osteoporosis, have not been studied in the context of metastatic disease. Characterization of these factors could help providers identify candidates for prophylactic stabilization thereby reducing the number of completed pathological fractures.

Methods: 298 patients over the age of 40 with metastatic bone disease of the femur treated between 2010-2021 were retrospectively identified. Patients without complete medical documentation or with non-metastatic diagnoses were excluded. 186 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria, including 74 patients who presented with pathological femur fracture and 112 patients who presented for prophylactic stabilization. Patient demographics and comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, COPD, cardiovascular disease, renal disease, osteoporosis, active tobacco or corticosteroid use, and use of anti-resorptive therapy were collected. Descriptive statistics were compiled, with univariable analysis by Mann-Whitney or chisquared testing. Multiple logistic regression was then performed to identify the most significant patient variables for presenting with completed fracture.

Results: On univariable analysis, patients with COPD were more likely to present with pathologic fracture (19/32 [59%] compared to 55/154 [36%], p = 0.02). A trend emerged for patients with an increasing number of comorbidities (28/55 [51%] for 2+ comorbidities compared to 18/61 [29%] with zero comorbidities, p = 0.06). On multivariable analysis, patients with two or more comorbidities (OR: 2.49; p=0.02) were more likely to present with a femur fracture.

Conclusion: This analysis suggests that those with an increasing number of comorbidities may be at increased risk for pathologic fracture. This study raises the possibility that patient factors and/ or comorbidities alter bone strength and/or pain experiences and may guide orthopaedic oncologists weighing prophylactic stabilization of femur lesions. Level of Evidence: III.

Background: Access to orthopaedic care across the United States (U.S.) remains an important issue, however, no recent study has examined disparities in rural access to orthopaedic care. The goals of the present study were to (1) investigate trends in the proportion of rural orthopaedic surgeons from 2013 to 2018 as well as the proportion of rural U.S. counties with access to such surgeons and (2) analyze characteristics associated with choice of a rural practice setting.

Methods: The study analyzed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician Compare National Downloadable File (PC-NDF) for all active orthopaedic surgeons from 2013 to 2018. Rural practice settings were defined using Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes. Linear regression analysis investigated trends in rural orthopaedic surgeon volume. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association of surgeon characteristics with rural practice setting.

Results: The total number of orthopaedic surgeons increased 1.9%, from 21,045 (2013) to 21,456 (2018). Meanwhile, the proportion of rural orthopaedic surgeons decreased by roughly 0.9%, from 578 (2013) to 559 (2018). From a per capita perspective, the number of orthopaedic surgeons practicing in a rural setting per 100,000 population ranged from 4.55 orthopaedic surgeons per 100,000 in 2013 and 4.47 per 100,000 in 2018. Meanwhile, the number of orthopaedic surgeons practicing in an urban setting ranged from 6.63 per 100,000 in 2013 and 6.35 per 100,000 in 2018. The surgeon characteristics most associated with decreased odds of practicing orthopaedic surgery in a rural setting included earlier career-stage (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: [0.70-0.91]; p < 0.001) and sub-specialization status (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: [0.36-0.45]; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Existing rural-urban disparities in musculoskeletal healthcare access have persisted over the past decade and could worsen. Future research should investigate the effects of orthopaedic workforce shortages on travel times, patient cost burden, and disease specific outcomes. Level of Evidence: IV.

Background: Despite the increased frequency of cephalomedullary fixation for unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures, failure with screw cut-out and varus collapse remains a significant failure mode. Proper positioning of implants into the femoral neck and head directly influences the stability of fracture fixation. Visualization of the femoral neck and head can be challenging and failure to do so may lead to poor results; Obstacles include patient positioning, body habitus, and implant application tools. We present the "Winquist View," an oblique fluoroscopic projection that shows the femoral neck in profile, aligns the implant and cephalic component, and assists in implant placement.

Methods: With the patient in the lateral position, the legs are scissored when possible. Following standard reduction techniques, the Winquist view is used to check reduction prior to surgical draping. Intraoperatively, we rely on a perfect image to place implants in the ideal portion of the femoral neck, with a trajectory that achieves the center-center or center-low position of the femoral neck. This is achieved by incorporating the anterior-posterior, lateral, and Winquist view.

Results: We present 3 patients who underwent fixation with a cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric hip fractures. The Winquist view facilitated excellent visualization and positioning in all cases. All postoperative courses were uneventful, without failures or complications.

Conclusion: While standard intraoperative imaging may be adequate in many cases, the Winquist view facilitates optimal implant positioning and fracture reduction. With lateral imaging, implant insertion guides may obscure visualization of the femoral neck during which Winquist view is the most helpful. Level of Evidence: V.

A 35-year-old right hand dominant male sustained a high energy closed right distal radius fracture with associated generalized paresthesias. Following closed reduction, the patient was found to have an atypical low ulnar nerve palsy upon outpatient follow-up. After continued symptoms and an equivocal wrist MRI the patient underwent surgical exploration. Intraoperatively, the ulnar nerve as well as the ring and small finger flexor digitorum superficialis tendons were found to be translocated around the ulnar head. The nerve and tendons were reduced, the median nerve was decompressed, and the fracture was addressed with volar plating. Post-operatively, the patient continued to have sensory deficits and stiffness of the ring and small fingers. After one year, he reported substantial improvements as demonstrated by full sensation (4.0 mm two-point discrimination) and fixed flexion contractures at the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints of the small finger. The patient returned to work without functional limitations. This case highlights a unique case of ulnar nerve and flexor tendon entrapment following a distal radius fracture. History, physical examination, and a high index of clinical suspicion is essential for proper management of this rare injury. Level of Evidence: V.

Background: Diversity in orthopedics is lacking despite ongoing efforts to create a more inclusive workforce. Increasing diversity necessitates recruitment and retainment of underrepresented providers, which involves representation among leadership, mentorship initiatives, and development of a safe work environment. Discrimination and harassment behaviors are prevalent within orthopedics. Current initiatives aim to address these behaviors among peers and supervising physicians, but patients are an additional underrecognized source of these negative workplace behaviors. This report aims to establish the prevalence of patient-initiated discrimination and harassment within a single academic orthopedic department and establish methods to reduce these behaviors in the workplace.

Methods: An internet-based survey was designed using the Qualtrics platform. The survey was distributed to all employees of a single academic orthopedic department including nursing staff, clerks, advanced practice providers, research staff, residents/fellows, and staff physicians. Survey was distributed on two occasions between May and June of 2021. The survey collected information on respondent demographics, experience with patient-initiated discrimination/harassment, and opinions regarding possible intervention methods. Fisher exact test was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Over one half of survey respondents report observing or personally experiencing patient-initiated discrimination within our orthopedics department (57%, n=110). Nearly half of respondents report observing or personally experiencing patient-initiated harassment within our department (46%, n=80). Encounters with these behaviors were more commonly reported from resident and staff female physicians. The most frequently reported negative patient-initiated behaviors include gender discrimination and sexual harassment. Discordance exists regarding optimal methods to address these behaviors, but one third of respondents indicate potential benefit from visual aids throughout the department.

Conclusion: Discrimination and harassment behaviors is common within orthopedics, and patients are a significant source of this negative workplace behavior. Identification of this subset of negative behaviors will allow us to provide patient education and provider response tools for the protection of orthopedic staff members. Ideally, minimizing discrimination/harassment behaviors within our field will help create a more inclusive workplace environment and allow continued recruitment of diverse candidates into our field. Level of Evidence: V.

Background: Fragility femoral neck fractures are traditionally seen in elderly patients after a low-energy fall. In contrast, displaced femoral neck fractures in young patients are usually associated with high-energy mechanisms such as a fall from height or high-speed motor vehicle collisions. However, patients under the age of 45 with fragility femoral neck fractures represent a unique population, and one that is not well-described. This study aims to describe this population and their current workup.

Methods: A single institution retrospective chart review of patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation or percutaneous pinning of femoral neck fractures from 2010-2020 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were patients 16-45 years old and femoral neck fractures with a low-energy mechanism of injury (MOI). Exclusion criteria were high-energy fractures, pathologic fractures, and stress fractures. Patient demographics, MOI, past medical history, imaging studies, treatment plan, lab values, DEXA results, and surgical outcomes were recorded.

Results: The average age in our cohort was 33 ± 8.5 y/o. 44% (12/27) were male. Vitamin D level was obtained in 78% (21/27) patients and 71% (15/21) those patients were found to be abnormally low. A DEXA scan was obtained in 48% (13/27) of patients and abnormal bone density was found in 90% (9/10) of available results. 41% (11/27) patients received a bone health consultation.

Conclusion: A significant portion of femoral neck fractures in young patients were fragility fractures. Many of these patients did not receive bone health workup and their underlying health condition remained untreated. Our study highlighted a missed opportunity of treatment for this unique and poorly understood population. Level of Evidence: III.

Background: Food insecurity is an increasingly recognized public health issue. Identifying risk factors for food insecurity would support public health initiatives to provide targeted nutrition interventions to high-risk individuals. Food insecurity has not been investigated in the orthopedic trauma population.

Methods: From April 27, 2021 to June 23, 2021, we surveyed patients within six months of operative pelvic and/or extremity fracture fixation at a single institution. Food insecurity was assessed using the validated United States Department of Agriculture Household Food Insecurity questionnaire generating a food security score of 0 to 10. Patients with a food security score ≥ 3 were classified as Food Insecure (FI) and patients with a food security score < 3 were classified as Food Secure (FS). Patients also completed surveys for demographic information and food consumption. Differences between FI and FS for continuous and categorical variables were evaluated using the Wilcoxon sum rank test and Fisher's exact test, respectively. Spearman's correlation was used to describe the relationship between food security score and participant characteristics. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between patient demographics and odds of FI.

Results: We enrolled 158 patients (48% female) with a mean age of 45.5 ± 20.3 years. Twenty-one patients (13.3%) screened positive for food insecurity (High security: n=124, 78.5%; Marginal security: n=13, 8.2%; Low security: n=12, 7.6%; Very Low security: n=9, 5.7%). Those with a household income level of ≤ $15,000 were 5.7 times more likely to be FI (95% CI 1.8-18.1). Widowed/single/divorced patients were 10.2 times more likely to be FI (95% CI 2.3-45.6). Median time to the nearest full-service grocery store was significantly longer for FI patients (t=10 minutes) than for FS patients (t=7 minutes, p=0.0202). Age (r= -0.08, p=0.327) and hours working (r= -0.10, p=0.429) demonstrated weak to no correlation with food security score.

Conclusion: Food insecurity is common in the orthopedic trauma population at our rural academic trauma center. Those with lower household income and those living alone are more likely to be FI. Multicenter studies are warranted to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for food insecurity in a more diverse trauma population and to better understand its impact on patient outcomes. Level of Evidence: III.