首页 > 最新文献

The Iowa orthopaedic journal最新文献

英文 中文
Characteristics and Long-Term Outcome of Surgically Managed High-Grade Extremity Chondrosarcoma. 手术治疗的高级别肢体软骨肉瘤的特点和长期预后。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Trevor R Gulbrandsen, Mary Kate Skalitzky, Michael D Russell, Qiang An, Obada Hasan, Benjamin J Miller

Background: Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (DCS) is a highly malignant variant that portends a poor prognosis. Although factors such as clinico-pathological characteristics, surgical margin, and adjuvant modalities likely play a role in overall survival, debate continues with varying results on the importance of these indicators. The purpose of this study is (1) To delineate the characteristics, local recurrence (LR), and survival of patients with intermediate (IGCS), high (HGCS) and dedifferentiated (DCS) chondrosarcoma of the extremity by utilizing detailed cases at one tertiary institution. (2) To assess survival between high grade chondrosarcoma and DCS utilizing a less detailed but large cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods: Twenty-six cases of high-grade (conventional FNCLCC grades 2 and 3, dedifferentiated) chondrosarcoma were identified from an ongoing prospective cohort of 630 sarcoma patients managed surgically at a tertiary referral university hospital between 9/1/2010-12/30/2019. A retrospective review of demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical procedure, treatment course, and survival data was performed to determine prognostic factors for survival. An additional 516 cases of chondrosarcoma were identified from the SEER database. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, both the large database and case series were evaluated, and estimated cause-specific survival was calculated at 1, 2, and 5 years.

Results: There were 12 IGCS, 5 HGCS, and 9 DCS patients in the single institution cohort. DCS had a higher stage at diagnosis (p=0.04). Limb salvage was the most common procedure performed in every group (11/12 IGCS, 5/5 HGCS, and 7/9 DCS; p=0.56). Margins included 8/12 wide and 3/12 intralesional for IGCS. For HGCS, there were 3/5 wide, 1/5 marginal, and 1/5 intralesional. A majority of DCS margins were wide (8/9) with only 1 marginal. There was no difference of associated margins between the groups (p=0.85), however there was a difference when margins were classified based on numerical measurement (IGCS: 0.125cm (0.1-0.35); HGCS: 0cm (0-0.1); DCS: 0.2cm (0.1-0.5); p=0.03). The overall median follow-up was 26 months (IQR:16.1-70.8). The time interval from resection to death was lower in DCS (11.5 months (10.7-12.2)), followed by IGCS (30.3 months (16.2-78.2)), and HGCS (55.1 months (32.0-78.2; p=0.047). LR occurred in 5/9 DCS, 1/5 HGCS, and 1/14 IGCS patients. Of the DCS patients only 2/6 who received systemic therapy had LR, while all 3/3 who did not receive systemic therapy had LR. Overall systemic therapy and radiation did not impact incidence of LR (p=0.67; p=0.34). However, patients who had LR were 17.5 times more likely to die within one year (HR=17.5, 95%CI (1.01-303.7), p=0.049), after adjusting for the age at the surgery. There was no correlation with the utilization of systemic therapy, radiation therapy, or margin and o

背景:去分化软骨肉瘤(DCS)是一种高度恶性的变体,预示着预后不良。尽管临床病理特征、手术切缘和辅助方式等因素可能在总生存率中发挥作用,但关于这些指标的重要性的争论仍在继续,结果各不相同。本研究的目的是:(1)利用一家三级医院的详细病例,描述中等(IGCS)、高(HGCS)和去分化(DCS)四肢软骨肉瘤患者的特征、局部复发(LR)和生存率。(2) 利用来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的不太详细但规模较大的队列,评估高级别软骨肉瘤和DCS之间的生存率。方法:从2010年9月1日至2019年12月30日期间在一所三级转诊大学医院接受手术治疗的630名肉瘤患者的前瞻性队列中,确定了26例高级别(常规FNCLCC 2级和3级,去分化)软骨肉瘤。对人口统计学、肿瘤特征、手术程序、治疗过程和生存数据进行回顾性审查,以确定生存的预后因素。SEER数据库中又发现516例软骨肉瘤。使用Kaplan-Meier方法,对大型数据库和病例系列进行评估,并计算1年、2年和5年的估计病因特异性生存率。结果:在单一机构队列中有12名IGCS、5名HGCS和9名DCS患者。DCS在诊断时具有较高的分期(p=0.04)。在各组中,保肢是最常见的手术(11/12 IGCS、5/5 HGCS和7/9 DCS;p=0.056)。IGCS的边缘包括8/12宽和3/12病灶内。对于HGCS,有3/5宽,1/5边缘和1/5病变内。DCS的大多数边缘较宽(8/9),只有1个边缘。两组之间的相关边缘没有差异(p=0.85),但根据数值测量对边缘进行分类时存在差异(IGCS:0.125cm(0.1-0.35);HGCS:0cm(0-0.1);DCS:0.2cm(0.1-0.5);p=0.03)。总体中位随访时间为26个月(IQR:16.1-70.8)。DCS患者从切除到死亡的时间间隔较低(11.5个月(10.7-12.2)),其次是IGCS患者(30.3个月(16.2-78.2))和HGCS患者(55.1个月(32.0-78.2;p=0.047)。LR发生在5/9 DCS、1/5 HGCS和1/14 IGCS患者中。在DCS患者中,接受全身治疗的患者中只有2/6患有LR,而未接受全身治疗者中有3/3患有LR。全身治疗和放疗对LR的发生率没有影响(p=0.67;p=0.34)。然而,在调整手术年龄后,患有LR的患者在一年内死亡的可能性是其他患者的17.5倍(HR=17.5,95%CI(1.01-303.7),p=0.049)。与全身治疗、放射治疗的利用率或边际和总生存率无关(p=0.63,p=0.52,p=0.74)。在SEER患者队列中,149例(28.9%)为DCS,367例(71.1%)为HGCS。在最后的随访中,49.6%(n=256)的队列患者死于软骨肉瘤。HGCS与更高的1年生存机会有关(结论:高级别软骨肉瘤在许多患者中仍然是一种致命的疾病,尤其是与去分化亚型相关的患者。有趣的是,所有(100%)未接受全身治疗的DCS患者都患有LR。然而,化疗和放疗并没有显著提高生存率。在该病例系列和大型数据库研究中,HGCS的手术切缘最小,但LR和死亡的时间间隔最长。此外,使用SEER数据库,DCS和截肢在5年生存期的预后较差。对有价值的预后影响的进一步研究以及对这种罕见疾病的早期识别可能有助于开发更好的管理选择。证据级别:三。
{"title":"Characteristics and Long-Term Outcome of Surgically Managed High-Grade Extremity Chondrosarcoma.","authors":"Trevor R Gulbrandsen,&nbsp;Mary Kate Skalitzky,&nbsp;Michael D Russell,&nbsp;Qiang An,&nbsp;Obada Hasan,&nbsp;Benjamin J Miller","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (DCS) is a highly malignant variant that portends a poor prognosis. Although factors such as clinico-pathological characteristics, surgical margin, and adjuvant modalities likely play a role in overall survival, debate continues with varying results on the importance of these indicators. The purpose of this study is (1) To delineate the characteristics, local recurrence (LR), and survival of patients with intermediate (IGCS), high (HGCS) and dedifferentiated (DCS) chondrosarcoma of the extremity by utilizing detailed cases at one tertiary institution. (2) To assess survival between high grade chondrosarcoma and DCS utilizing a less detailed but large cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six cases of high-grade (conventional FNCLCC grades 2 and 3, dedifferentiated) chondrosarcoma were identified from an ongoing prospective cohort of 630 sarcoma patients managed surgically at a tertiary referral university hospital between 9/1/2010-12/30/2019. A retrospective review of demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical procedure, treatment course, and survival data was performed to determine prognostic factors for survival. An additional 516 cases of chondrosarcoma were identified from the SEER database. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, both the large database and case series were evaluated, and estimated cause-specific survival was calculated at 1, 2, and 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 12 IGCS, 5 HGCS, and 9 DCS patients in the single institution cohort. DCS had a higher stage at diagnosis (p=0.04). Limb salvage was the most common procedure performed in every group (11/12 IGCS, 5/5 HGCS, and 7/9 DCS; p=0.56). Margins included 8/12 wide and 3/12 intralesional for IGCS. For HGCS, there were 3/5 wide, 1/5 marginal, and 1/5 intralesional. A majority of DCS margins were wide (8/9) with only 1 marginal. There was no difference of associated margins between the groups (p=0.85), however there was a difference when margins were classified based on numerical measurement (IGCS: 0.125cm (0.1-0.35); HGCS: 0cm (0-0.1); DCS: 0.2cm (0.1-0.5); p=0.03). The overall median follow-up was 26 months (IQR:16.1-70.8). The time interval from resection to death was lower in DCS (11.5 months (10.7-12.2)), followed by IGCS (30.3 months (16.2-78.2)), and HGCS (55.1 months (32.0-78.2; p=0.047). LR occurred in 5/9 DCS, 1/5 HGCS, and 1/14 IGCS patients. Of the DCS patients only 2/6 who received systemic therapy had LR, while all 3/3 who did not receive systemic therapy had LR. Overall systemic therapy and radiation did not impact incidence of LR (p=0.67; p=0.34). However, patients who had LR were 17.5 times more likely to die within one year (HR=17.5, 95%CI (1.01-303.7), p=0.049), after adjusting for the age at the surgery. There was no correlation with the utilization of systemic therapy, radiation therapy, or margin and o","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296466/pdf/IOJ-2023-071.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9728040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Retrieval of a Lane Plate 82 Years After Implantation: Case Report, Metallurgical Analysis, and Historical Review. 植入82年后Lane钢板的恢复:病例报告、冶金分析和历史回顾。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Samuel Swenson, Mozart Queiroz Neto, Deborah J Hall, Robin Pourzal, James Kohler, Joseph Buckwalter

Background: The Lane plate was one of the first widely used bone plates, utilized in the first decades of the twentieth century. Here we present the results of a retrieval analysis on a Lane plate, and a review of the history of these plates. Our patient underwent plating of her femur with a Lane plate in 1938. She developed a sciatic nerve palsy, managed surgically later that year by Dr. Arthur Steindler at the University of Iowa. Her femur healed, her nerve recovered, and she did well until 2020, at age 94, when she presented to the University of Iowa with a draining sinus that appeared to communicate with the plate. She underwent irrigation and debridement with hardware removal. The plate was sectioned, and its composition and structure characterized.

Methods: We retrieved hard copies of the patient's archived medical records from 1938, which document in detail the treatments performed by Dr. Steindler. The plate was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to characterize the surface of the plate. A cross section was taken from the plate, and the composition of the alloy was determined using energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS). A review of the literature surrounding early plating techniques was conducted.

Results: Our patient recovered from her surgery and soon returned to her baseline state of health. Intraoperative cultures grew C. acnes. Analysis of the surface of the plate demonstrated significant corrosion, and the crystal structure seen on SEM suggested a strong alloy that is prone to corrosion. Analysis of the cross section with EDS demonstrated an alloy containing 94.9% iron, 1.7% aluminum, 1.2% chromium, and 1.1% manganese.

Conclusion: The Lane plate was introduced around 1907 by Sir William Arbuthnot Lane, a British surgeon, and was one of the first widely used devices for the plating of fractures. Given that this patient was likely one of the last to be treated with a Lane plate, this may be the final opportunity for such a retrieval analysis. Level of Evidence: IV.

背景:Lane钢板是最早广泛使用的骨板之一,在20世纪的头几十年被广泛使用。在这里,我们提出了一个检索分析的结果对莱恩板,并回顾了这些板的历史。我们的病人于1938年用Lane钢板对股骨进行了钢板植入。她患上了坐骨神经麻痹,同年晚些时候由爱荷华大学的亚瑟·斯坦德勒医生进行了手术治疗。她的股骨愈合了,神经也恢复了,直到2020年,94岁的她向爱荷华大学(University of Iowa)提交了一个似乎与钢板相通的引流窦。她接受冲洗和清创术并取出硬体。对该板进行了切片,并对其组成和结构进行了表征。方法:我们检索了1938年患者病历档案的硬拷贝,其中详细记录了斯坦德勒医生所做的治疗。利用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对板材表面进行了表征。采用能量色散x射线能谱仪(EDS)测定了合金的成分。本文对早期电镀技术的相关文献进行了综述。结果:我们的病人从手术中恢复,并很快恢复到她的基线健康状态。术中培养生长痤疮杆菌。对板材表面的分析显示出明显的腐蚀,SEM上的晶体结构表明这是一种易于腐蚀的强合金。EDS分析表明,该合金含有94.9%的铁、1.7%的铝、1.2%的铬和1.1%的锰。结论:Lane钢板是在1907年由英国外科医生William Arbuthnot Lane引入的,是最早广泛应用于骨折钢板的设备之一。考虑到该患者可能是最后接受Lane钢板治疗的患者之一,这可能是进行此类检索分析的最后机会。证据等级:四级。
{"title":"Retrieval of a Lane Plate 82 Years After Implantation: Case Report, Metallurgical Analysis, and Historical Review.","authors":"Samuel Swenson,&nbsp;Mozart Queiroz Neto,&nbsp;Deborah J Hall,&nbsp;Robin Pourzal,&nbsp;James Kohler,&nbsp;Joseph Buckwalter","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Lane plate was one of the first widely used bone plates, utilized in the first decades of the twentieth century. Here we present the results of a retrieval analysis on a Lane plate, and a review of the history of these plates. Our patient underwent plating of her femur with a Lane plate in 1938. She developed a sciatic nerve palsy, managed surgically later that year by Dr. Arthur Steindler at the University of Iowa. Her femur healed, her nerve recovered, and she did well until 2020, at age 94, when she presented to the University of Iowa with a draining sinus that appeared to communicate with the plate. She underwent irrigation and debridement with hardware removal. The plate was sectioned, and its composition and structure characterized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved hard copies of the patient's archived medical records from 1938, which document in detail the treatments performed by Dr. Steindler. The plate was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to characterize the surface of the plate. A cross section was taken from the plate, and the composition of the alloy was determined using energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS). A review of the literature surrounding early plating techniques was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our patient recovered from her surgery and soon returned to her baseline state of health. Intraoperative cultures grew C. acnes. Analysis of the surface of the plate demonstrated significant corrosion, and the crystal structure seen on SEM suggested a strong alloy that is prone to corrosion. Analysis of the cross section with EDS demonstrated an alloy containing 94.9% iron, 1.7% aluminum, 1.2% chromium, and 1.1% manganese.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Lane plate was introduced around 1907 by Sir William Arbuthnot Lane, a British surgeon, and was one of the first widely used devices for the plating of fractures. Given that this patient was likely one of the last to be treated with a Lane plate, this may be the final opportunity for such a retrieval analysis. <b>Level of Evidence: IV</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296478/pdf/IOJ-2023-037.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9728033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Establishing Construct Validity of a Novel Simulator for Guide Wire Navigation in Antegrade Femoral Intramedullary Nailing. 新型股骨顺行髓内钉导丝导航模拟器的构建有效性研究。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Jan D Rölfing, Lisa B Salling, Steven A Long, Bjoern Vogt, Donald D Anderson, Geb W Thomas, Rune D Jensen

Background: Antegrade femoral intramedullary nailing (IMN) is a common orthopedic procedure that residents are exposed to early in their training. A key component to this procedure is placing the initial guide wire with fluoroscopic guidance. A simulator was developed to train residents on this key skill, building off an existing simulation platform originally developed for wire navigation during a compression hip screw placement. The objective of this study was to assess the construct validity of the IMN simulator.

Methods: Thirty orthopedic surgeons participated in the study: 12 had participated in fewer than 10 hip fracture or IMN related procedures and were categorized as novices; 18 were faculty, categorized as experts. Both cohorts were instructed on the goal of the task, placing a guide wire for an IM nail, and the ideal wire position reference that their wire placement would be graded against. Participants completed 2 assessments with the simulator. Performance was graded on the distance from the ideal starting point, distance from the ideal end point, wire trajectory, duration, fluoroscopy image count, and other elements of surgical decision making. A two-way ANOVA analysis was used to analyze the data looking at experience level and trial number.

Results: The expert cohort performed significantly better than the novice cohort on all metrics but one (overuse of fluoroscopy). The expert cohort had a more accurate starting point and completed the task while using fewer images and less overall time.

Conclusion: This initial study shows that the IMN application of a wire navigation simulator demonstrates good construct validity. With such a large cohort of expert participants, we can be confident that this study captures the performance of active surgeons today. Implementing a training curriculum on this simulator has the potential to increase the performance of the novice level residents prior to their operating on a vulnerable patient. Level of Evidence: III.

背景:顺行股髓内钉(IMN)是一种常见的骨科手术,住院医生在早期训练中就接触到了。该程序的一个关键组成部分是在透视引导下放置初始导丝。为了训练住院医生掌握这一关键技能,我们开发了一个模拟器,该模拟器是在现有的模拟平台的基础上开发的,该平台最初是为压缩髋关节螺钉置入期间的导线导航而开发的。本研究的目的是评估IMN模拟器的构念效度。方法:30名骨科医生参与研究:12名参加过少于10次髋部骨折或IMN相关手术,被归类为新手;18人是教师,被归类为专家。两组受试者都接受了任务目标的指导,为IM钉放置导丝,以及他们放置导丝的理想位置参考。参与者用模拟器完成了2项评估。根据与理想起点的距离、与理想终点的距离、钢丝轨迹、持续时间、透视图像计数和其他手术决策因素对效果进行评分。采用双因素方差分析分析数据,考察经验水平和试验数。结果:除了一项指标(过度使用透视)外,专家队列在所有指标上的表现都明显优于新手队列。专家组的起点更准确,使用更少的图像和更少的总时间就完成了任务。结论:本初步研究显示,线导航模拟器的IMN应用具有良好的结构效度。有了这么多的专家参与者,我们可以确信这项研究捕捉到了当今活跃外科医生的表现。在这个模拟器上实施培训课程有可能提高新手水平的住院医生在对易受伤害的病人进行手术之前的表现。证据水平:III。
{"title":"Establishing Construct Validity of a Novel Simulator for Guide Wire Navigation in Antegrade Femoral Intramedullary Nailing.","authors":"Jan D Rölfing,&nbsp;Lisa B Salling,&nbsp;Steven A Long,&nbsp;Bjoern Vogt,&nbsp;Donald D Anderson,&nbsp;Geb W Thomas,&nbsp;Rune D Jensen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antegrade femoral intramedullary nailing (IMN) is a common orthopedic procedure that residents are exposed to early in their training. A key component to this procedure is placing the initial guide wire with fluoroscopic guidance. A simulator was developed to train residents on this key skill, building off an existing simulation platform originally developed for wire navigation during a compression hip screw placement. The objective of this study was to assess the construct validity of the IMN simulator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty orthopedic surgeons participated in the study: 12 had participated in fewer than 10 hip fracture or IMN related procedures and were categorized as novices; 18 were faculty, categorized as experts. Both cohorts were instructed on the goal of the task, placing a guide wire for an IM nail, and the ideal wire position reference that their wire placement would be graded against. Participants completed 2 assessments with the simulator. Performance was graded on the distance from the ideal starting point, distance from the ideal end point, wire trajectory, duration, fluoroscopy image count, and other elements of surgical decision making. A two-way ANOVA analysis was used to analyze the data looking at experience level and trial number.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The expert cohort performed significantly better than the novice cohort on all metrics but one (overuse of fluoroscopy). The expert cohort had a more accurate starting point and completed the task while using fewer images and less overall time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This initial study shows that the IMN application of a wire navigation simulator demonstrates good construct validity. With such a large cohort of expert participants, we can be confident that this study captures the performance of active surgeons today. Implementing a training curriculum on this simulator has the potential to increase the performance of the novice level residents prior to their operating on a vulnerable patient. <b>Level of Evidence: III</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296486/pdf/IOJ-2023-031.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9728036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Match Patterns. 新冠肺炎疫情对骨科住院医师申请匹配模式的影响
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Andrew J Sama, Nicholas C Schiller, Andres R Perez, Jacob L Cohen, Chester J Donnally, Seth D Dodds

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on the orthopaedic match process are yet to be fully understood and should be explored. We hypothesize that the cancellation of away rotations due to the COVID-19 pandemic would decrease the variability of where students matched into orthopaedic residency compared to pre-pandemic years.

Methods: Accredited orthopaedic programs were collected from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) database. Rosters of orthopaedic residency classes for the years 2019, 2020, and 2021 were compiled across all orthopaedic programs in the United States. Data collection for the incoming 2021 orthopaedic surgery residents was carried out by reviewing each program's website, Instagram, and Twitter.

Results: Data for the incoming orthopaedic surgery residents from the 2021 National Residency Match Program (NRMP) were collected. 25.7% of incoming residents matched at their home institution. Data collection for the 2020 and 2019 orthopaedic residency classes yielded 19.2% and 19.5% home institution match rates, respectively. When examining likelihood to match into an orthopaedic residency program in ones own's state, we found that in the 2021 match cycle, 39.3% of applicants matched within their state, while 34.3% and 33.4% of incoming residents matched in 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Conclusion: To keep our patients and staff safe, visiting externship rotations were suspended in the 2021 Match cycle. As we continue to navigate the shifting waters of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is important to understand how our choices affect the dynamics of applying into residency training and beyond. This study demonstrates that a higher percentage of applicants that matched into orthopaedic residency remained at their home program compared to the previous two years before the pandemic. This indicates that programs tended to rank their home applicants, and that applicants tended to rank their home programs, higher than those that were less familiar. Level of Evidence: IV.

背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行及其对骨科匹配过程的影响尚不完全清楚,值得探讨。我们假设,与大流行前相比,由于COVID-19大流行而取消客场轮换将降低学生匹配到骨科住院医师的变异性。方法:从研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)数据库中收集经认证的骨科项目。2019年、2020年和2021年的骨科住院医师班名册是在美国所有骨科项目中编制的。通过查看每个项目的网站、Instagram和Twitter,为即将到来的2021年骨科住院医师收集数据。结果:收集来自2021年全国住院医师匹配计划(NRMP)的骨科住院医师的数据。25.7%的新来港住院人士在原住院舍配对。2020年和2019年骨科住院医师课程的数据收集分别获得了19.2%和19.5%的家庭机构匹配率。在检查与自己所在州的骨科住院医师项目匹配的可能性时,我们发现,在2021年的匹配周期中,39.3%的申请人在他们的州内匹配,而2020年和2019年分别有34.3%和33.4%的新居民匹配。结论:为了保证患者和工作人员的安全,我们暂停了2021年Match周期的访问实习轮换。当我们继续在COVID-19大流行的变化水域中航行时,重要的是要了解我们的选择如何影响申请住院医师培训及其他方面的动态。这项研究表明,与大流行前两年相比,符合骨科住院医师资格的申请人中,有更高比例的人留在了他们的家庭项目中。这表明,项目倾向于给他们的家庭申请人排名,而申请人倾向于给他们的家庭项目排名,高于那些不太熟悉的项目。证据等级:四级。
{"title":"Effects of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Match Patterns.","authors":"Andrew J Sama,&nbsp;Nicholas C Schiller,&nbsp;Andres R Perez,&nbsp;Jacob L Cohen,&nbsp;Chester J Donnally,&nbsp;Seth D Dodds","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on the orthopaedic match process are yet to be fully understood and should be explored. We hypothesize that the cancellation of away rotations due to the COVID-19 pandemic would decrease the variability of where students matched into orthopaedic residency compared to pre-pandemic years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accredited orthopaedic programs were collected from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) database. Rosters of orthopaedic residency classes for the years 2019, 2020, and 2021 were compiled across all orthopaedic programs in the United States. Data collection for the incoming 2021 orthopaedic surgery residents was carried out by reviewing each program's website, Instagram, and Twitter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data for the incoming orthopaedic surgery residents from the 2021 National Residency Match Program (NRMP) were collected. 25.7% of incoming residents matched at their home institution. Data collection for the 2020 and 2019 orthopaedic residency classes yielded 19.2% and 19.5% home institution match rates, respectively. When examining likelihood to match into an orthopaedic residency program in ones own's state, we found that in the 2021 match cycle, 39.3% of applicants matched within their state, while 34.3% and 33.4% of incoming residents matched in 2020 and 2019, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To keep our patients and staff safe, visiting externship rotations were suspended in the 2021 Match cycle. As we continue to navigate the shifting waters of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is important to understand how our choices affect the dynamics of applying into residency training and beyond. This study demonstrates that a higher percentage of applicants that matched into orthopaedic residency remained at their home program compared to the previous two years before the pandemic. This indicates that programs tended to rank their home applicants, and that applicants tended to rank their home programs, higher than those that were less familiar. <b>Level of Evidence: IV</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296470/pdf/IOJ-2023-023.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9734437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Early Versus Delayed Surgery for Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Systematic Review. 锁骨中轴骨折的早期与延迟手术:一项系统综述。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Peter H Sanchez, Ignacio Garcia Fleury, Emily A Parker, John Davison, Robert Westermann, Benjamin Kopp, Michael C Willey, Joseph A Buckwalter

Background: Orthopaedic surgeons debate the timing of and necessity for surgical intervention when treating displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (MCFs). This systematic review evaluates the available literature regarding functional outcomes, complication rates, nonunion, and reoperation rates between patients undergoing early versus delayed surgical management of MCFs.

Methods: Search strategies were applied in PubMed (Medline), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Elsevier), Sport Discus (EBSCO), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley). Following an initial screening and full-text review, demographic and study outcome data was extracted for comparison between the early fixation and delayed fixation studies.

Results: Twenty-one studies were identified for inclusion. This resulted in 1158 patients in the early group and 44 in the delayed. Demographics were similar between groups except for a higher percentage of males in the early group (81.6% vs. 61.4%) and longer time to surgery in the delayed group (4.6 days vs. 14.5 months). Disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores (3.6 vs. 13.0) and Constant-Murley scores (94.0 vs. 86.0) were better in the early group. Percentages of initial surgeries resulting in complication (33.8% vs. 63.6%), nonunion (1.2% vs. 11.4%), and nonroutine reoperation (15.8% vs. 34.1%) were higher in the delayed group.

Conclusion: Outcomes of nonunion, reoperation, complications, DASH scores, and CM scores favor early surgery over delayed surgery for MCFs. However, given the small cohort of delayed patients who still achieved moderate outcomes, we recommend a shared decision-making style for treatment recommendations regarding individual patients with MCFs. Level of Evidence: II.

背景:骨科医生在治疗移位性中轴锁骨骨折(mcf)时,手术干预的时机和必要性一直存在争议。本系统综述评估了早期与延迟手术治疗mcf患者的功能结局、并发症发生率、不愈合和再手术率。方法:采用检索策略在PubMed (Medline)、CINAHL (EBSCO)、Embase (Elsevier)、Sport Discus (EBSCO)和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley)进行检索。在初步筛选和全文综述之后,提取了人口统计学和研究结果数据,用于比较早期固定和延迟固定研究。结果:21项研究被纳入。这导致1158例患者为早期组,44例为延迟组。除了早期组男性比例较高(81.6%对61.4%)和延迟组手术时间较长(4.6天对14.5个月)外,两组间的人口统计数据相似。早期组的手臂、肩部和手部残疾评分(3.6比13.0)和Constant-Murley评分(94.0比86.0)较好。延迟组首次手术导致并发症的百分比(33.8%比63.6%),不愈合(1.2%比11.4%)和非常规再手术(15.8%比34.1%)更高。结论:骨不连、再手术、并发症、DASH评分和CM评分的结果倾向于早期手术而不是延迟手术。然而,考虑到一小部分延迟患者仍然取得了中等结果,我们建议对单个mcf患者的治疗建议采用共同的决策方式。证据水平:II。
{"title":"Early Versus Delayed Surgery for Midshaft Clavicle Fractures: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Peter H Sanchez,&nbsp;Ignacio Garcia Fleury,&nbsp;Emily A Parker,&nbsp;John Davison,&nbsp;Robert Westermann,&nbsp;Benjamin Kopp,&nbsp;Michael C Willey,&nbsp;Joseph A Buckwalter","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopaedic surgeons debate the timing of and necessity for surgical intervention when treating displaced midshaft clavicle fractures (MCFs). This systematic review evaluates the available literature regarding functional outcomes, complication rates, nonunion, and reoperation rates between patients undergoing early versus delayed surgical management of MCFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search strategies were applied in PubMed (Medline), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase (Elsevier), Sport Discus (EBSCO), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Wiley). Following an initial screening and full-text review, demographic and study outcome data was extracted for comparison between the early fixation and delayed fixation studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies were identified for inclusion. This resulted in 1158 patients in the early group and 44 in the delayed. Demographics were similar between groups except for a higher percentage of males in the early group (81.6% vs. 61.4%) and longer time to surgery in the delayed group (4.6 days vs. 14.5 months). Disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand scores (3.6 vs. 13.0) and Constant-Murley scores (94.0 vs. 86.0) were better in the early group. Percentages of initial surgeries resulting in complication (33.8% vs. 63.6%), nonunion (1.2% vs. 11.4%), and nonroutine reoperation (15.8% vs. 34.1%) were higher in the delayed group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outcomes of nonunion, reoperation, complications, DASH scores, and CM scores favor early surgery over delayed surgery for MCFs. However, given the small cohort of delayed patients who still achieved moderate outcomes, we recommend a shared decision-making style for treatment recommendations regarding individual patients with MCFs. <b>Level of Evidence: II</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10296473/pdf/IOJ-2023-151.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9739921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pregnancy During Orthopaedic Surgery Residency: The Iowa Experience. 妊娠骨科住院医师:爱荷华州的经验。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-06-01
Malynda Wynn, Ericka Lawler, Sarah Schippers, Tina Hajewski, Elizabeth Weldin, Heather Campion

Family planning is a challenge for physicians at all stages of their careers, but particularly difficult during residency. Residency commonly occurs during prime childbearing years and is associated with long work hours and inflexible schedules. A commonly cited deterrent for women entering orthopaedic surgery is the inability to achieve a healthy and fulfilling work-life balance.1 Further, those women who pursue starting a family during residency have been shown to have higher rates of pregnancy-related complications including infertility with complications rates as high as 30%.2,3 In a recent AAOS article, a call to action for modified policies to prioritize the health of pregnant orthopaedic surgeons and their unborn children was made to decrease the overall risk to women who wish to have children during residency and early practice.4 The University of Iowa has a history of attracting women into the orthopedic training program. We asked past graduates of the University of Iowa Orthopedic Residency program who had children during residency to share their personal experiences and opinions. We asked past graduates to answer five questions surrounding their pregnancy during residency. We have included the good, the bad, and the ugly with real-life testimonies in hopes that despite the statistics, women in our field considering pregnancy will find comfort in those that have been through it. Four prior residents were kind enough to share their experiences. Dr. Sarah Schippers (SS) completed residency in 2021 and is currently finishing a hand and upper extremity fellowship and will soon be starting private practice in Kansas. She shares on her experience regarding two pregnancies during residency. Dr. Tina Hajewski (TH) completed residency in 2021 and is also currently finishing a spine fellowship and will soon be starting private practice in Washington, sharing on her experience having two children during residency. Dr. Elizabeth Weldin (EW) completed residency in 2018 and is a current hand and upper extremity attending in Oklahoma and shares her experience having a child during residency and the contrast to having children during practice. Finally, Dr. Heather Campion (HW) completed residency in 2012 and is a current hand and upper extremity attending in Oregon and shares her experience as being the first Iowa orthopaedic resident to have a child during residency. Level of Evidence: V.

计划生育对医生在其职业生涯的各个阶段都是一个挑战,但在住院医师期间尤其困难。住院医师通常发生在黄金生育年龄,与长时间工作和不灵活的时间表有关。阻碍女性从事骨科手术的一个常见因素是无法实现健康和令人满意的工作与生活的平衡此外,那些在住院期间寻求组建家庭的妇女有更高的妊娠相关并发症发生率,包括不孕症,并发症发生率高达30%。在最近的一篇AAOS文章中,呼吁修改政策,优先考虑怀孕的骨科医生和他们未出生的孩子的健康,以降低希望在住院和早期执业期间生孩子的妇女的总体风险爱荷华大学有吸引女性参加骨科培训项目的历史。我们询问了爱荷华大学骨科住院医师项目的前毕业生,他们在住院期间有孩子,分享了他们的个人经历和意见。我们让过去的毕业生回答了五个关于他们在实习期间怀孕的问题。我们收录了好的、坏的和丑陋的真实证词,希望尽管统计数据如此,在我们这个领域考虑怀孕的女性会从那些经历过怀孕的人身上找到安慰。四位之前的住院医生很友好地分享了他们的经历。Sarah Schippers博士(SS)于2021年完成住院医师,目前正在完成手部和上肢奖学金,并将很快在堪萨斯州开始私人执业。她分享了她在住院医生期间两次怀孕的经历。Tina Hajewski博士(TH)于2021年完成住院医师实习期,目前正在完成脊柱奖学金,并将很快在华盛顿开始私人执业,分享她在住院医师期间有两个孩子的经验。Elizabeth Weldin博士(EW)于2018年完成住院医师实习期,目前是俄克拉荷马州的手部和上肢主治医师,她分享了她在住院医师期间生孩子的经历,以及在实习期间生孩子的对比。最后,Heather Campion医生(HW)在2012年完成了住院医师实习期,目前是俄勒冈州的手部和上肢主治医师,她分享了她作为爱荷华州第一位在住院期间生孩子的骨科住院医师的经验。证据等级:V。
{"title":"Pregnancy During Orthopaedic Surgery Residency: The Iowa Experience.","authors":"Malynda Wynn,&nbsp;Ericka Lawler,&nbsp;Sarah Schippers,&nbsp;Tina Hajewski,&nbsp;Elizabeth Weldin,&nbsp;Heather Campion","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Family planning is a challenge for physicians at all stages of their careers, but particularly difficult during residency. Residency commonly occurs during prime childbearing years and is associated with long work hours and inflexible schedules. A commonly cited deterrent for women entering orthopaedic surgery is the inability to achieve a healthy and fulfilling work-life balance.<sup>1</sup> Further, those women who pursue starting a family during residency have been shown to have higher rates of pregnancy-related complications including infertility with complications rates as high as 30%.<sup>2,3</sup> In a recent AAOS article, a call to action for modified policies to prioritize the health of pregnant orthopaedic surgeons and their unborn children was made to decrease the overall risk to women who wish to have children during residency and early practice.<sup>4</sup> The University of Iowa has a history of attracting women into the orthopedic training program. We asked past graduates of the University of Iowa Orthopedic Residency program who had children during residency to share their personal experiences and opinions. We asked past graduates to answer five questions surrounding their pregnancy during residency. We have included the good, the bad, and the ugly with real-life testimonies in hopes that despite the statistics, women in our field considering pregnancy will find comfort in those that have been through it. Four prior residents were kind enough to share their experiences. Dr. Sarah Schippers (SS) completed residency in 2021 and is currently finishing a hand and upper extremity fellowship and will soon be starting private practice in Kansas. She shares on her experience regarding two pregnancies during residency. Dr. Tina Hajewski (TH) completed residency in 2021 and is also currently finishing a spine fellowship and will soon be starting private practice in Washington, sharing on her experience having two children during residency. Dr. Elizabeth Weldin (EW) completed residency in 2018 and is a current hand and upper extremity attending in Oklahoma and shares her experience having a child during residency and the contrast to having children during practice. Finally, Dr. Heather Campion (HW) completed residency in 2012 and is a current hand and upper extremity attending in Oregon and shares her experience as being the first Iowa orthopaedic resident to have a child during residency. Level of Evidence: V.</p>","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210436/pdf/IOJ-42-01-011.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40497757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Factors for Blood Transfusions in Primary Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis. 原发性解剖和反向全肩关节置换术治疗骨关节炎时输血的危险因素。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-06-01
Danny Lee, Ryan Lee, Safa C Fassihi, Monica Stadecker, Jessica H Heyer, Seth Stake, Kyla Rakoczy, Thomas Rodenhouse, Rajeev Pandarinath

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors for blood transfusion in primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) performed for osteoarthritis.

Methods: Patients who underwent anatomic or reverse TSA for a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis were identified in a national surgical database from 2005 to 2018 by utilizing both CPT and ICD-9/ICD-10 codes. Univariate analysis was performed on the two transfused versus non-transfused cohorts to compare for differences in comorbidities and demographics. Independent risk factors for perioperative blood transfusions were identified via multivariate regression models.

Results: 305 transfused and 18,124 nontransfused patients were identified. Female sex (p<0.001), age >85 years (p=0.001), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (p=0.001), dialysis dependence (p=0.001), acute renal failure (p=0.012), hematologic disorders (p=0.010), disseminated cancer (p<0.001), ASA ≥ 3 (p<0.001), and functional dependence (p=0.001) were shown to be independent risk factors for blood transfusions on multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Conclusion: Several independent risk factors for blood transfusion following anatomic/reverse TSA for osteoarthritis were identified. Awareness of these risk factors can help surgeons and perioperative care teams to both identify and optimize high-risk patients to decrease both transfusion requirements and its associated complications in this patient population. Level of Evidence: III.

背景:本研究的目的是确定原发性解剖和反向全肩关节置换术(TSA)治疗骨关节炎时输血的危险因素。方法:利用CPT和ICD-9/ICD-10代码,从2005年至2018年的国家外科数据库中识别出经解剖或反向TSA诊断为原发性骨关节炎的患者。对输血组和非输血组进行单因素分析,比较合并症和人口统计学的差异。通过多变量回归模型确定围手术期输血的独立危险因素。结果:共发现输血患者305例,未输血患者18124例。女性(p85岁(p=0.001),胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(p=0.001),透析依赖(p=0.001),急性肾功能衰竭(p=0.012),血液系统疾病(p=0.010),弥散性癌症(p)结论:骨关节炎解剖/反向TSA术后输血的几个独立危险因素被确定。了解这些危险因素可以帮助外科医生和围手术期护理团队识别和优化高危患者,以减少患者群体的输血需求及其相关并发症。证据水平:III。
{"title":"Risk Factors for Blood Transfusions in Primary Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis.","authors":"Danny Lee,&nbsp;Ryan Lee,&nbsp;Safa C Fassihi,&nbsp;Monica Stadecker,&nbsp;Jessica H Heyer,&nbsp;Seth Stake,&nbsp;Kyla Rakoczy,&nbsp;Thomas Rodenhouse,&nbsp;Rajeev Pandarinath","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors for blood transfusion in primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) performed for osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent anatomic or reverse TSA for a diagnosis of primary osteoarthritis were identified in a national surgical database from 2005 to 2018 by utilizing both CPT and ICD-9/ICD-10 codes. Univariate analysis was performed on the two transfused versus non-transfused cohorts to compare for differences in comorbidities and demographics. Independent risk factors for perioperative blood transfusions were identified via multivariate regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>305 transfused and 18,124 nontransfused patients were identified. Female sex (p<0.001), age >85 years (p=0.001), insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (p=0.001), dialysis dependence (p=0.001), acute renal failure (p=0.012), hematologic disorders (p=0.010), disseminated cancer (p<0.001), ASA ≥ 3 (p<0.001), and functional dependence (p=0.001) were shown to be independent risk factors for blood transfusions on multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several independent risk factors for blood transfusion following anatomic/reverse TSA for osteoarthritis were identified. Awareness of these risk factors can help surgeons and perioperative care teams to both identify and optimize high-risk patients to decrease both transfusion requirements and its associated complications in this patient population. <b>Level of Evidence: III</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210430/pdf/IOJ-42-01-217.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40584885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current State of Research Gap-Years in Orthopedic Surgery Residency Applicants: Program Directors' Perspectives. 骨科住院医师申请研究空白年的现状:项目主管的观点。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-06-01
Eric J Cotter, Evan M Polce, Kathryn L Williams, Andrea M Spiker, Brian F Grogan, Gerald J Lang

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine how orthopedic residency program directors (PDs) evaluate residency applicants who participated in a research gap-year (RGY).

Methods: A 23 question electronically administered survey was created and emailed to all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) orthopedic residency PDs for the 2020-21 application cycle. PDs were emailed directly if active contact information was identifiable. If not, program coordinators were emailed. The survey contained questions regarding the background information of programs and aimed at identifying how PDs view and evaluate residency applicants who participated in a RGY. Descriptive statistics for each question were performed.

Results: Eighty-four (41.8%) of 201 PDs responded. Most respondent programs (N=62, 73.8%) identified as an academic center. The most common geographic region was the Midwest, N=33 (39.3%). Few programs (N=3, 3.8%) utilize a publication "cut-off" when screening residency applicants. When asked how many peer-reviewed publications were necessary to deem a RGY as "productive," responses ranged from 0-15 publications (median interquartile range 4.5 [3-5]). Forty-one (53.3%) PDs stated they would council medical students to take a RGY with USMLE Step 1 scores being the #1 factor guiding that advice. More PDs disagree than agree (N=35, 43.6%; vs N=22, 28.2%) that applicants who complete a RGY are more competitive applicants, and 35 PDs (45.5%) agree research experiences will become more important in resident selection as USMLE Step 1 transitions to Pass/Fail.

Conclusion: Program directors have varying views on residency applicants who did a RGY. While few programs use a publication cutoff, the median number of publications deemed as being a "productive" RGY was approximately 5. Many PDs agree that research experiences will become more important as USMLE Step becomes Pass/Fail. This information can be useful for students interested in pursuing a RGY and for residency programs when evaluating residency applicants. Level of Evidence: IV.

背景:本研究的目的是确定骨科住院医师计划主任(pd)如何评估参加研究间隔年(RGY)的住院医师申请人。方法:创建了一份包含23个问题的电子管理调查,并通过电子邮件发送给所有研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME) 2020-21申请周期的骨科住院医师。如果活跃的联系信息是可识别的,则直接向pd发送电子邮件。如果没有,我们会给项目协调员发电子邮件。该调查包含有关项目背景信息的问题,旨在确定博士如何看待和评估参加RGY的住院医师申请人。对每个问题进行描述性统计。结果:201名pd中有84人(41.8%)回复。大多数被调查的项目(N=62, 73.8%)被确定为学术中心。最常见的地理区域是中西部,N=33(39.3%)。很少有项目(N= 3,3.8%)在筛选住院医师申请人时使用出版物“截止”。当被问及需要多少同行评议的出版物才能认为RGY是“富有成效的”时,回答的范围从0-15份不等(四分位数中位数范围为4.5[3-5])。41位(53.3%)博士表示,他们会建议医科学生参加RGY, USMLE第一步分数是指导该建议的首要因素。不同意多于同意(N=35, 43.6%;(N=22, 28.2%)认为完成RGY的申请人更具竞争力,35名博士(45.5%)认为,随着USMLE第一步过渡到通过/不通过,研究经验将在住院医师选择中变得更加重要。结论:项目主管对做RGY的住院医师申请人有不同的看法。虽然很少有程序使用发布截止,但被认为是“有效的”RGY的发布数量的中位数大约是5。许多博士都认为,随着USMLE步骤变得通过/不通过,研究经验将变得更加重要。这些信息对于有兴趣攻读RGY的学生和在评估住院医师申请时的住院医师项目是有用的。证据等级:四级。
{"title":"Current State of Research Gap-Years in Orthopedic Surgery Residency Applicants: Program Directors' Perspectives.","authors":"Eric J Cotter,&nbsp;Evan M Polce,&nbsp;Kathryn L Williams,&nbsp;Andrea M Spiker,&nbsp;Brian F Grogan,&nbsp;Gerald J Lang","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine how orthopedic residency program directors (PDs) evaluate residency applicants who participated in a research gap-year (RGY).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 23 question electronically administered survey was created and emailed to all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) orthopedic residency PDs for the 2020-21 application cycle. PDs were emailed directly if active contact information was identifiable. If not, program coordinators were emailed. The survey contained questions regarding the background information of programs and aimed at identifying how PDs view and evaluate residency applicants who participated in a RGY. Descriptive statistics for each question were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four (41.8%) of 201 PDs responded. Most respondent programs (N=62, 73.8%) identified as an academic center. The most common geographic region was the Midwest, N=33 (39.3%). Few programs (N=3, 3.8%) utilize a publication \"cut-off\" when screening residency applicants. When asked how many peer-reviewed publications were necessary to deem a RGY as \"productive,\" responses ranged from 0-15 publications (median interquartile range 4.5 [3-5]). Forty-one (53.3%) PDs stated they would council medical students to take a RGY with USMLE Step 1 scores being the #1 factor guiding that advice. More PDs disagree than agree (N=35, 43.6%; vs N=22, 28.2%) that applicants who complete a RGY are more competitive applicants, and 35 PDs (45.5%) agree research experiences will become more important in resident selection as USMLE Step 1 transitions to Pass/Fail.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Program directors have varying views on residency applicants who did a RGY. While few programs use a publication cutoff, the median number of publications deemed as being a \"productive\" RGY was approximately 5. Many PDs agree that research experiences will become more important as USMLE Step becomes Pass/Fail. This information can be useful for students interested in pursuing a RGY and for residency programs when evaluating residency applicants. <b>Level of Evidence: IV</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210394/pdf/IOJ-42-01-019.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40587934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Utilization of Arthroscopy During Ankle Fracture Fixation Among Early Career Surgeons: An Evaluation of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Oral Examination Database. 关节镜在早期职业外科医生踝关节骨折固定中的应用:对美国矫形外科委员会第二部分口腔检查数据库的评估。
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-06-01
Alan G Shamrock, Zain M Khazi, Christopher N Carender, Annunziato Amendola, Natalie Glass, Kyle R Duchman

Background: Rotational ankle fractures are common injuries associated with high rates of intra-articular injury. Traditional ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) techniques provide limited capacity for evaluation of intra-articular pathology. Ankle arthroscopy represents a minimally invasive technique to directly visualize the articular cartilage and syndesmosis while aiding with reduction and allowing joint debridement, loose body removal, and treatment of chondral injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate temporal trends in concomitant ankle arthroscopy during ankle fracture ORIF surgery amongst early-career orthopaedic surgeons while examining the influence of subspecialty fellowship training on utilization.

Methods: The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II Oral Examination database was queried to identify all candidates performing at least one ankle fracture ORIF from examination years 2010 to 2019. All ORIF cases were examined to identify those that carried a concomitant CPT code for ankle arthroscopy. Concomitant ankle arthroscopy cases were categorized by candidates self-reported fellowship training status and examination year. Descriptive statistics were performed to report relevant data and linear regression analyses were utilized to assess temporal trends in concomitant ankle arthroscopy with ORIF for ankle fractures. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

Results: During the study period, there were 36,113 cases of ankle fracture ORIF performed of which 388 cases (1.1%) were performed with concomitant ankle arthroscopy. Ankle fracture ORIF was most frequently performed by trauma fellowship trained ABOS Part II candidates (n=8,888; 24.6%), followed by sports medicine (n=7,493; 20.8%) and foot and ankle (n=6,563; 18.2%). Arthroscopy was most frequently utilized by foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons (293/6,270 cases; 4.5%) followed by sports medicine (29/7,464 cases; 0.4%) and trauma (4/8,884 cases; 0.1%). With respect to arthroscopic cases, 293 cases (75.5%) were performed by foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons, 29 (7.5%) sports medicine, and 4 (1.0%) trauma. Ankle arthroscopy utilization significantly increased from 3.65 cases per 1,000 ankle fractures in 2010 to 13.91 cases per 1,000 ankle fractures in 2019 (p=0.010). Specifically, foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons demonstrated a significant increase in arthroscopy utilization during ankle fracture ORIF over time (p<0.001; OR: 1.101; CI: 1.054-1.151).

Conclusion: Ankle arthroscopy utilization during ankle fracture ORIF has increased over the past decade. Foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons contribute most significantly to this trend. Level of Evidence: IV.

背景:踝关节旋转骨折是一种常见的损伤,其关节内损伤的发生率很高。传统的踝关节骨折切开复位内固定(ORIF)技术在评估关节内病理方面的能力有限。踝关节镜是一种微创技术,可以直接观察关节软骨和联合,同时帮助复位,允许关节清创,游离体移除和软骨损伤治疗。本研究的目的是评估早期职业骨科医生在踝关节骨折ORIF手术中同时进行踝关节镜检查的时间趋势,同时检查亚专科奖学金培训对其使用的影响。方法:查询美国骨科外科委员会(ABOS)第二部分口腔检查数据库,以确定2010年至2019年检查年度至少进行一次踝关节骨折ORIF的所有候选人。对所有ORIF病例进行检查,以确定那些伴有踝关节镜检查CPT代码的病例。合并踝关节镜病例根据考生自述的奖学金培训状况和考试年份进行分类。采用描述性统计报告相关数据,并采用线性回归分析评估踝关节骨折联合ORIF联合踝关节镜治疗的时间趋势。结果:研究期间共行踝关节骨折ORIF手术36113例,其中388例(1.1%)合并踝关节镜手术。踝关节骨折ORIF最常由创伤奖学金培训的ABOS第二部分候选人进行(n=8,888;24.6%),其次是运动医学(n=7,493;20.8%)和足部及踝关节(n= 6563;18.2%)。关节镜最常用于足部和踝关节培训的外科医生(293/ 6270例;4.5%),其次是运动医学(29/7,464);0.4%)和外伤(4/8,884例;0.1%)。关节镜下手术293例(75.5%),运动医学手术29例(7.5%),外伤手术4例(1.0%)。踝关节镜使用率从2010年的3.65例/ 1000例踝关节骨折增加到2019年的13.91例/ 1000例踝关节骨折(p=0.010)。具体而言,经过足部和踝关节研究培训的外科医生表明,随着时间的推移,踝关节骨折ORIF中关节镜的使用显著增加(结论:踝关节骨折ORIF中关节镜的使用在过去十年中有所增加。足部和踝关节训练有素的外科医生对这一趋势贡献最大。证据等级:四级。
{"title":"Utilization of Arthroscopy During Ankle Fracture Fixation Among Early Career Surgeons: An Evaluation of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Oral Examination Database.","authors":"Alan G Shamrock,&nbsp;Zain M Khazi,&nbsp;Christopher N Carender,&nbsp;Annunziato Amendola,&nbsp;Natalie Glass,&nbsp;Kyle R Duchman","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotational ankle fractures are common injuries associated with high rates of intra-articular injury. Traditional ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) techniques provide limited capacity for evaluation of intra-articular pathology. Ankle arthroscopy represents a minimally invasive technique to directly visualize the articular cartilage and syndesmosis while aiding with reduction and allowing joint debridement, loose body removal, and treatment of chondral injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate temporal trends in concomitant ankle arthroscopy during ankle fracture ORIF surgery amongst early-career orthopaedic surgeons while examining the influence of subspecialty fellowship training on utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II Oral Examination database was queried to identify all candidates performing at least one ankle fracture ORIF from examination years 2010 to 2019. All ORIF cases were examined to identify those that carried a concomitant CPT code for ankle arthroscopy. Concomitant ankle arthroscopy cases were categorized by candidates self-reported fellowship training status and examination year. Descriptive statistics were performed to report relevant data and linear regression analyses were utilized to assess temporal trends in concomitant ankle arthroscopy with ORIF for ankle fractures. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, there were 36,113 cases of ankle fracture ORIF performed of which 388 cases (1.1%) were performed with concomitant ankle arthroscopy. Ankle fracture ORIF was most frequently performed by trauma fellowship trained ABOS Part II candidates (n=8,888; 24.6%), followed by sports medicine (n=7,493; 20.8%) and foot and ankle (n=6,563; 18.2%). Arthroscopy was most frequently utilized by foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons (293/6,270 cases; 4.5%) followed by sports medicine (29/7,464 cases; 0.4%) and trauma (4/8,884 cases; 0.1%). With respect to arthroscopic cases, 293 cases (75.5%) were performed by foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons, 29 (7.5%) sports medicine, and 4 (1.0%) trauma. Ankle arthroscopy utilization significantly increased from 3.65 cases per 1,000 ankle fractures in 2010 to 13.91 cases per 1,000 ankle fractures in 2019 (p=0.010). Specifically, foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons demonstrated a significant increase in arthroscopy utilization during ankle fracture ORIF over time (p<0.001; OR: 1.101; CI: 1.054-1.151).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ankle arthroscopy utilization during ankle fracture ORIF has increased over the past decade. Foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons contribute most significantly to this trend. <b>Level of Evidence: IV</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210429/pdf/IOJ-42-01-103.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40610390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient and Disease Related Risk Factors Associated With Return to Sport Rates After AVN Treatment. 与AVN治疗后恢复运动率相关的患者和疾病相关危险因素
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2022-06-01
Patrick England, Julien Y Aoyama, Divya Talwar, Lawrence Wells

Background: Avascular necrosis (AVN) is a rare albeit serious condition that has a high risk for long term morbidity given the risk of chronic pain and arthroplasty after diagnoses. The recent rise in sports participation in the pediatric population demonstrates the importance of evaluating functional limitations after AVN treatment. Return to sport (RTS) rates after treatment for AVN have not been evaluated in pediatric or adolescent populations.It is necessary to evaluate all joints impacted by AVN due to heterogenous nature of the disease and the variety of sports that could be impacted by disease specific activity restrictions. Thus, this present study aimed to characterize RTS rate after AVN treatment, determine if there was a difference in RTS rates after operative versus nonoperative management, and identify demographic and treatment factors associated with RTS rates.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients ages eight to twenty years old who were treated for symptomatic AVN of any joint between January 2005 and August 2021. Patient records were reviewed for demographic, disease, and treatment variables. Standard descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were performed to describe and compare groups who did and did not RTS. A generalized estimating model was used to determine variables that were associated with better RTS rates.

Results: A total of 144 patients and 190 lesions were evaluated in the study, 60 patients (43%) were female with a mean age of 14.36+/-3.24 years. The overall RTS rate after AVN treatment was 67% (64/96). Roughly 8% of patients (5/64) were able to return to multiple sports, however of those that returned to sports, 6% (4/64) reported playing at a lower level of competition. There was not a significant difference between the RTS rate for those who underwent operative versus nonoperative management (70% versus 62%, p=0.38). Males were almost 2.5 times more likely to return to sport than females (OR: 2.46, p=0.018).

Conclusion: The ability to return to sports after AVN treatment has largely remained unknown in the pediatric and adolescent populations. Our data suggests that a majority of patients are able to RTS in the short term follow up with males being twice as likely to RTS compared to females. Physicians should maintain awareness of the long-term morbidity of AVN and understand the unique patient and disease characteristics that optimize functional outcomes in this population. Level of Evidence: III.

背景:缺血性坏死(AVN)是一种罕见但严重的疾病,由于诊断后存在慢性疼痛和关节置换术的风险,其长期发病率很高。最近儿科人群中运动参与的增加表明了评估AVN治疗后功能限制的重要性。AVN治疗后重返运动(RTS)率尚未在儿科或青少年人群中进行评估。由于疾病的异质性以及疾病特异性活动限制可能影响的各种运动,有必要评估所有受AVN影响的关节。因此,本研究旨在描述AVN治疗后的RTS率,确定手术与非手术治疗后RTS率是否存在差异,并确定与RTS率相关的人口统计学和治疗因素。方法:本回顾性队列研究评估了2005年1月至2021年8月期间接受任何关节症状性AVN治疗的8至20岁患者。对患者记录进行人口统计、疾病和治疗变量的审查。采用标准描述性统计和双变量分析来描述和比较采用RTS和不采用RTS的组。我们使用了一个广义估计模型来确定与更高RTS率相关的变量。结果:共检查144例患者190个病灶,其中女性60例(43%),平均年龄14.36±3.24岁。AVN治疗后总RTS率为67%(64/96)。大约8%的患者(5/64)能够恢复多种运动,然而,在那些恢复运动的患者中,6%(4/64)报告在较低水平的比赛中比赛。接受手术治疗与非手术治疗的RTS率无显著差异(70%对62%,p=0.38)。男性重返运动的可能性几乎是女性的2.5倍(OR: 2.46, p=0.018)。结论:在儿童和青少年人群中,AVN治疗后恢复运动的能力在很大程度上仍然未知。我们的数据表明,大多数患者能够在短期随访中使用RTS,男性使用RTS的可能性是女性的两倍。医生应保持对AVN长期发病率的认识,并了解优化该人群功能结局的独特患者和疾病特征。证据水平:III。
{"title":"Patient and Disease Related Risk Factors Associated With Return to Sport Rates After AVN Treatment.","authors":"Patrick England,&nbsp;Julien Y Aoyama,&nbsp;Divya Talwar,&nbsp;Lawrence Wells","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Avascular necrosis (AVN) is a rare albeit serious condition that has a high risk for long term morbidity given the risk of chronic pain and arthroplasty after diagnoses. The recent rise in sports participation in the pediatric population demonstrates the importance of evaluating functional limitations after AVN treatment. Return to sport (RTS) rates after treatment for AVN have not been evaluated in pediatric or adolescent populations.It is necessary to evaluate all joints impacted by AVN due to heterogenous nature of the disease and the variety of sports that could be impacted by disease specific activity restrictions. Thus, this present study aimed to characterize RTS rate after AVN treatment, determine if there was a difference in RTS rates after operative versus nonoperative management, and identify demographic and treatment factors associated with RTS rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients ages eight to twenty years old who were treated for symptomatic AVN of any joint between January 2005 and August 2021. Patient records were reviewed for demographic, disease, and treatment variables. Standard descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were performed to describe and compare groups who did and did not RTS. A generalized estimating model was used to determine variables that were associated with better RTS rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 144 patients and 190 lesions were evaluated in the study, 60 patients (43%) were female with a mean age of 14.36+/-3.24 years. The overall RTS rate after AVN treatment was 67% (64/96). Roughly 8% of patients (5/64) were able to return to multiple sports, however of those that returned to sports, 6% (4/64) reported playing at a lower level of competition. There was not a significant difference between the RTS rate for those who underwent operative versus nonoperative management (70% versus 62%, p=0.38). Males were almost 2.5 times more likely to return to sport than females (OR: 2.46, p=0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ability to return to sports after AVN treatment has largely remained unknown in the pediatric and adolescent populations. Our data suggests that a majority of patients are able to RTS in the short term follow up with males being twice as likely to RTS compared to females. Physicians should maintain awareness of the long-term morbidity of AVN and understand the unique patient and disease characteristics that optimize functional outcomes in this population. <b>Level of Evidence: III</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9210403/pdf/IOJ-42-01-193.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40610393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The Iowa orthopaedic journal
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1