Critical Pathways in Cardiology最新文献

Aortic dissection (AD) is a potentially fatal cardiovascular issue that needs to be diagnosed and treated very away. While early detection is essential for bettering patient outcomes, there are substantial obstacles with the diagnostic techniques used today. Promising pathways for improving AD prognosis evaluation and early detection are presented by recent developments in serum biomarkers. The most recent research on serum biomarkers for AD is reviewed here, with an emphasis on the prognostic and diagnostic utility of these indicators. A number of biomarkers, including as matrix metalloproteinases, soluble elastin fragments, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, and D-dimer, have been identified as putative markers of AD. These indicators are indicative of multiple pathophysiological mechanisms associated with AD, including inflammation, extracellular matrix remodeling, and vascular damage. Research has indicated that they are useful in differentiating AD from other acute cardiovascular diseases, facilitating prompt diagnosis and risk assessment.

Background: The use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary revascularization for left-main disease is still debated. The study aimed to characterize patients who received dual versus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for unprotected left-main disease and compare the outcomes of those patients.

Results: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 551 patients who were grouped into 2 groups: patients who received SAPT (n = 150) and those who received DAPT (n = 401). There were no differences in age ( P = 0.451), gender ( P = 0.063), smoking ( P = 0.941), diabetes mellitus ( P = 0.773), history of myocardial infarction ( P = 0.709), chronic kidney disease ( P = 0.615), atrial fibrillation ( P = 0.306), or cerebrovascular accident ( P = 0.550) between patients who received SAPT versus DAPT. DAPTs were more commonly used in patients with acute coronary syndrome [87 (58%) vs. 273 (68.08%); P = 0.027], after off-pump CABG [12 (8%) vs. 73 (18.2%); P = 0.003] and in patients with radial artery grafts [1 (0.67%) vs. 32 (7.98%); P < 0.001]. While SAPTs were more commonly used in patients with low ejection fraction [55 (36.67%) vs. 61 (15.21%); P < 0.001] and in patients with postoperative acute kidney injury [27 (18%) vs. 37 (9.23%); P = 0.004]. The attributed treatment effect of DAPT for follow-up major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events was not significantly different from that of SAPT [β, -2.08 (95% confidence interval (CI), -20.8-16.7); P = 0.828]. The attributed treatment effect of DAPT on follow-up all-cause mortality was not significantly different from that of SAPT [β, 4.12 (CI, -11.1-19.32); P = 0.595]. There was no difference in bleeding between groups ( P = 0.666).

Conclusions: DAPTs were more commonly used in patients with acute coronary syndrome, after off-pump CABG, and with radial artery grafts. SAPTs were more commonly used in patients with low ejection fraction and acute kidney injury. Patients on DAPT after CABG for left-main disease had comparable major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events and survival to patients on SAPT, with no difference in bleeding events.

The use of Impella assist device for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiogenic shock has increased in the last decade and requires a large bore arterial access (LBA). However, LBA closure following Impella removal is associated with significant complications. Herein, we describe the safety and efficacy of a novel method of LBA closure using arterial recoil following Impella removal. We performed a retrospective review of electronic medical records of patients who underwent LBA closure using this method from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2022. The procedure involves controlled downsizing of the arterial sheath from 12 French (Fr) to 6 Fr catheters with intermittent compression to allow patent hemostasis facilitated by arterial recoil. Baseline characteristics and outcomes including closure success, immediate/delayed bleeding, and access site complications were included. Of 103 patients with Impella placement, 20 (19%) underwent LBA closure with this method. Patients were predominantly male (80%) and White (55%) with a mean age of 65 ± 16 years. After downsizing of the femoral sheath to 6 Fr, 14 patients underwent manual compression, 3 patients had a 6 Fr catheter left in place to maintain access, and 3 patients underwent placement of a Perclose or Vascade device. Successful LBA closure was performed in all patients with no immediate or delayed bleeding complications. Five patients (25%) died inpatient; the deaths were unrelated to complications of Impella removal. In conclusion, LBA closure post-Impella removal with this novel method was safe and effective. Further prospective studies are needed to ascertain its comparative efficacy.

Background: Several studies have been conducted over the years to find an effective and safe therapeutic agent to treat hypercholesterolemia. Inclisiran is a novel drug being studied for its efficacy and safety in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in patients to reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases. No previous study was done to review the trials for the serious adverse events of this drug. The primary objective of this research is to investigate the incidence of serious adverse events of this drug.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials is performed.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from their inception till July 3, 2023, was performed for ORION trials, studying the efficacy and safety of inclisiran. The random-effects model was used in the meta-analysis to provide a pooled proportion of serious adverse events. The risk of bias in each study was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

Results: From 319 studies searched from the databases, only 8 relevant articles remained after a detailed evaluation. These studies, having a total of 4981 patients, were involved in the analysis, with a pooled estimate showing a nonsignificant incidence of serious adverse events. Each adverse event was studied individually, and product issues and endocrine disorders had the highest odds ratio among them. All included studies were classified as moderate quality.

Conclusion: Following systematic review and meta-analysis, we found no significant differences in any serious adverse events following the administration of inclisiran. However, larger ongoing trials will provide additional data to evaluate the safety profile of this agent.

Background: Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is characterized by a low platelet count. This may lead to an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke but a lower rate of nonhemorrhagic stroke. The goal of this study was to evaluate the association between ITP and both hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic strokes using a large database.

Methods: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to analyze the occurrence of hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic stroke in patients with and without a diagnosis of ITP from 2005 to 2014.

Results: Univariate analysis revealed a higher incidence of hemorrhagic stroke in patients with ITP in the year studied. (for example, in 2005: OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.57-1.94; P < 0.001; 2014: OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 2.03-2.36; P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, race, and hypertension, hemorrhagic stroke remained significantly associated with ITP (in 2005: OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.49-1.89; P < 0.001; 2014: OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.86-2.18; P < 0.001) for all the years studied. Nonhemorrhagic stroke occurred at a lower rate in patients with ITP in most years (2006: OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.97; P = 0.004; 2014: OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed a higher rate of nonhemorrhagic stroke in ITP patients.

Conclusion: Our analysis showed that there was a higher rate of hemorrhagic stroke but a lower rate of ischemic stroke in ITP patients, suggesting an important role of platelets in the occurrence of stroke.

Background: Early detection and follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are important and can be lifesaving. The goal of this study was to evaluate if routine abdominal aorta screenings during echocardiograms can be helpful in detecting asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Methods: We retrospective studied consecutive patients who were sent for outpatient routine echocardiograms for various clinical reasons in 2015-2017 until we reached a total of 1000 patients. Starting from the subcostal and then proceeding to the abdomen, a long-axis screening of the abdominal aorta was attempted on all of the patients after the echocardiogram was completed. No patient preparation was given. Imaging began from the subcostal view and proceeded caudally with images obtained every 1-2 cm. Measurement of the aortic diameter was performed from the longitudinal plane using the leading-edge-to-leading-edge method.

Results: The age range was 33-96 years with a median age of 72.4. A total of 273 (27.3%) patients did not have an appropriate window to evaluate AAA. Among the remaining 727 screenings, 18 (2.4%) had dilatation of abdominal aorta or AAA. The dilatation and aneurysms ranged between 2.5 and 4.5 cm in size. Abnormal aortic diameters were as follows: 5 (27.7%) were between 2.5 and 2.9 cm, 6 (33.3%) between 3 and 3.4 cm, 1 (5.5%) between 3.5 and 3.9, 5 (27.7%) between 4.0 and 4.4 cm, and 1 (5.5%) between 4.5 and 4.9 cm.

Conclusions: Performing routine abdominal aortic examinations during routine echocardiographic exams can detect a significant amount of abdominal aortic aneurysm which can be lifesaving. We suggest adding abdominal aortic assessment to routine echocardiographic examination.

Introduction: The prevalence of arterial hypertension (HTA) was continuously increased with a low percentage of pressure control blood pressure among treated patients. Therapeutic education (TE) was one of the inventive methods in the management of high blood pressure (HBP) worldwide. The objective was to assess the impact of TE on the control and management of HBP.

Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study consisting of an intervention, a pretest, and a post-test evaluation. This study was conducted in the external consultation service of cardiology CHU HEDI CHAKER of Sfax during over a period of 4 months (November 2021-March 2022).

Results: In total, 35 of the patients (50%) were women with a sex ratio of 1. The mean age was 63.33 ± 8.91 years. We noted a statistically significant decrease on both systolic and diastolic blood pressure blood pressure values after TE among educated patients (135.3 ± 9.77 vs. 141.9 ± 10.9; P  = 0.010) and (75 [70-80] vs. 80 [75-80]; P  = 0.002), respectively. We found a significantly good knowledge about HBP definition (Odds ratio [OR] = 3.4; P  = 0.022), HBP symptoms (OR = 9.1; P  < 0.001), and HBP complications (OR = 12.3; P  < 0.001) among educated patients. A significant association was noted between educated patients and low daily salt consumption after TE (OR = 2.7; P  = 0.048). Powered by Editorial Manager and ProduXion Manager from Aries Systems Corporation Educated patients had significantly more adequate auto-control devise use (OR = 1.01; P  = 0.028). Moreover, the respect of therapeutic compliance was statistically more important among educated patients (OR = 3.7; P  = 0.028).

Conclusions: Our results showed that the TE training session is an operative intervention to improve HBP management. Thus, integrating TE therapy in daily care should be continuous and should be exhaustive to all cardiovascular and all chronic diseases.

Introduction: The etiological assessment after an acute unprovoked pulmonary embolism (PE) represents an essential step in the overall management of the patient, with the aim of adapting the duration and type of anticoagulant to be used, avoiding recurrence and thus improving overall morbidity and mortality, but this is not such a simple question to answer.

Purpose: The main objective of this work is to know the benefit of a limited etiology strategy versus an extensive strategy after a first episode of acute non-provoked PE, first on all-cause mortality, and then the superiority of one strategy over another on the diagnosis of cancer at 1 year in patients admitted to a cardiac intensive care unit.

Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study from 2014 to 2021, which includes all patients, admitted to a cardiac intensive care unit for a first episode, at high or high intermediate risk of mortality at day 30. The included patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received a limited cancer screening strategy, and those who received, in addition to the latter, an injected cerebral and cervical-thoracic-abdominal scan, and the determination of tumor markers. All data were extracted from the medical hospital files.

Results: In total, we included 130 patients. The mean age of our patients was 87.19 (SD = 6.1), with a female predominance with a percentage of 55.4%. Eighty-seven patients benefited from an extensive cancer screening strategy, versus 43 patients who benefited from a limited strategy. First, for mortality at 1 year, 27 deaths were found between the 2 groups but without significant difference (hazard ratio; 0.53; P = 0.16), and for the mean duration from embolic episode to death, there was a mean of 20 weeks for the limited strategy group and 24 weeks for the extensive strategy group, with a nonsignificant difference ( P = 0.106). For the diagnosis of cancer at 1 year, 28 patients were diagnosed with cancer: 13 patients in the limited strategy group versus 15 in the extensive strategy group, with no significant difference (hazard ratio, 1.983; P = 0.082). The mean time to diagnosis was 22 weeks in the limited strategy group and 20 weeks in the extensive strategy, with no significant difference ( P = 0.729).

Conclusion: To date, no scientific evidence has been established for the extensive versus the limited strategy, therefore, a minimal etiological workup is also effective in the detection of cancer after unprovoked PE.