Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000399
Muhammad Memon, Robert H Christenson, Gordon Jacobsen, Fred S Apple, Adam J Singer, Alexander T Limkakeng, William F Peacock, Christopher R deFilippi, Joseph B Miller, James McCord
Background: Differentiating type 1 myocardial infarction (T1-MI) from type 2 MI (T2-MI) remains a diagnostic challenge, even with the availability of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. This study explored whether N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP), BNP, and their respective ratios to troponin could enhance the ability to distinguish between these MI subtypes.
Methods: As a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assays in the United States substudy, we examined data from 280 patients diagnosed with non-ST elevation MI (172 with T1-MI and 108 with T2-MI). We assessed NT-proBNP, BNP, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I, and their ratios as potential discriminative biomarkers. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves.
Results: NT-proBNP levels were markedly elevated in T2-MI patients compared with those with T1-MI (mean: 10,327 ± 12,923 vs. 4675 ± 11,740 ng/L; P = 0.006). Conversely, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentrations were higher in T1-MI (1.4 ± 5.1 vs. 0.5 ± 1.1 ng/L; P = 0.030). Notably, the NT-proBNP-to-troponin ratio was more than 3 times greater in T2-MI cases (94,880 ± 152,648 vs. 24,209 ± 78,727; P = 0.007). NT-proBNP alone demonstrated fair discriminatory capacity [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.717, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.578-0.856], closely matching the NT-proBNP-to-troponin ratio (AUC: 0.720, 95% CI: 0.566-0.873). In contrast, BNP and the BNP-to-troponin ratio offered lower diagnostic values. Mean BNP levels were 505.4 ± 576.6 ng/L for those with T2-MI and 437.1 ± 738.8 ng/L for patients with T1-MI. BNP-to-troponin ratio showed a poor discrimination for the 2 MI types (AUC: 0.660; 95% CI: 0.532-0.789).
Conclusions: Both NT-proBNP and its ratio to troponin show potential in differentiating T1-MI from T2-MI, reflecting distinct underlying pathophysiological processes. Given its comparable performance to the ratio, NT-proBNP alone may serve as a practical and cost-effective standalone marker. These findings support the hypothesis that incorporating NT-proBNP testing into routine clinical workflows may better inform the management of patients with suspected MI.
背景:区分1型心肌梗死(T1-MI)和2型心肌梗死(T2-MI)仍然是一个诊断挑战,即使有高灵敏度的心肌肌钙蛋白检测方法。本研究探讨NT-proBNP、BNP及其与肌钙蛋白的比值是否可以增强区分这些心肌梗死亚型的能力。方法:作为一项高us亚研究,我们检查了280例诊断为非st段抬高型心肌梗死的患者的数据(172例为T1-MI, 108例为T2-MI)。我们评估了NT-proBNP、BNP、hs-cTnI及其比值作为潜在的鉴别性生物标志物。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估诊断准确性。结果:T2-MI患者NT-proBNP水平明显高于T1-MI患者(平均10,327±12,923 vs 4,675±11,740 ng/L; P=0.006)。相反,T1-MI组hs-cTnI浓度较高(1.4±5.1 vs 0.5±1.1 ng/L; P=0.030)。值得注意的是,nt - probnp与肌钙蛋白之比在T2-MI病例中高出3倍以上(94,880±152,648 vs 24,209±78,727;P=0.007)。NT-proBNP单独显示出公平的区分能力(AUC 0.717, 95% CI 0.578-0.856),与NT-proBNP-肌钙蛋白比值(AUC 0.720, 95% CI 0.566-0.873)密切匹配。相比之下,BNP和BNP与肌钙蛋白比值的诊断价值较低。T2-MI患者BNP平均水平为505.4±576.6 ng/L, T1-MI患者BNP平均水平为437.1±738.8 ng/L。肌钙蛋白与肌钙蛋白的比值对2种心肌梗死类型的鉴别能力较差(AUC, 0.660; 95% CI, 0.532-0.789)。结论:NT-proBNP及其与肌钙蛋白的比值在T1-MI和T2-MI的鉴别中显示出潜在的潜力,反映了不同的潜在病理生理过程。考虑到NT-proBNP的性能与比率相当,NT-proBNP单独可以作为实用且具有成本效益的独立标记。这些发现支持了将NT-proBNP检测纳入常规临床工作流程可能更好地告知疑似心肌梗死患者的管理的假设。
{"title":"N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and B-Type Natriuretic Peptide-to-Troponin - Ratios for Differentiating Type 1 From Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A HIGH-US Substudy.","authors":"Muhammad Memon, Robert H Christenson, Gordon Jacobsen, Fred S Apple, Adam J Singer, Alexander T Limkakeng, William F Peacock, Christopher R deFilippi, Joseph B Miller, James McCord","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000399","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000399","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differentiating type 1 myocardial infarction (T1-MI) from type 2 MI (T2-MI) remains a diagnostic challenge, even with the availability of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. This study explored whether N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP), BNP, and their respective ratios to troponin could enhance the ability to distinguish between these MI subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Assays in the United States substudy, we examined data from 280 patients diagnosed with non-ST elevation MI (172 with T1-MI and 108 with T2-MI). We assessed NT-proBNP, BNP, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I, and their ratios as potential discriminative biomarkers. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NT-proBNP levels were markedly elevated in T2-MI patients compared with those with T1-MI (mean: 10,327 ± 12,923 vs. 4675 ± 11,740 ng/L; P = 0.006). Conversely, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentrations were higher in T1-MI (1.4 ± 5.1 vs. 0.5 ± 1.1 ng/L; P = 0.030). Notably, the NT-proBNP-to-troponin ratio was more than 3 times greater in T2-MI cases (94,880 ± 152,648 vs. 24,209 ± 78,727; P = 0.007). NT-proBNP alone demonstrated fair discriminatory capacity [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.717, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.578-0.856], closely matching the NT-proBNP-to-troponin ratio (AUC: 0.720, 95% CI: 0.566-0.873). In contrast, BNP and the BNP-to-troponin ratio offered lower diagnostic values. Mean BNP levels were 505.4 ± 576.6 ng/L for those with T2-MI and 437.1 ± 738.8 ng/L for patients with T1-MI. BNP-to-troponin ratio showed a poor discrimination for the 2 MI types (AUC: 0.660; 95% CI: 0.532-0.789).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both NT-proBNP and its ratio to troponin show potential in differentiating T1-MI from T2-MI, reflecting distinct underlying pathophysiological processes. Given its comparable performance to the ratio, NT-proBNP alone may serve as a practical and cost-effective standalone marker. These findings support the hypothesis that incorporating NT-proBNP testing into routine clinical workflows may better inform the management of patients with suspected MI.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145151220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-05-14DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000393
Saliha Erdem, Amro Taha, Neel Patel, Anoop Titus, Muhammad Aamir, Yasemin Bahar, Yasar Sattar, Khola Waheed Khan, Waleed Alruwaili, Aneeza Jamshed, Nagib Chalfoun, Islam Y Elgendy, M Chadi Alraies
Background: The use of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for symptomatic mitral regurgitation is steadily increasing. However, the outcomes of TEER among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including readmission trends, remain unknown.
Methods: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried between 2016 and 2020 to identify TEER patients with and without AF. The 2 groups were then compared using propensity score matching and multivariate regression models. The outcomes included inhospital mortality, ` (AKI), heart failure (HF), acute stroke, myocardial infarction, postprocedure bleeding, and cardiac tamponade.
Results: A total of 39,867 TEER procedure recipients were included over the study period, of which, 24,729 (62%) had AF compared to 15,138 (38%) with no AF diagnosis. On adjusted analysis, the AF group had a higher rate of inpatient mortality, AKI, HF, and postprocedural bleeding. On the contrary, TEER with AF group had lower odds of myocardial infarction. The risk of stroke and cardiac tamponade was similar between the 2 groups. The median length of stay (LOS) at index hospitalization was longer in the AF cohort in comparison with those without [2 days (interquartile range: 5-1) vs. 1 day (interquartile range: 3-1)].
Conclusions: AF in TEER procedure recipients was associated with worse outcomes including a higher rate of inpatient mortality, AKI, and HF compared with the patients without AF. Readmission rates at 30, 90, and 180 days were similar between the 2 groups.
背景:经导管边缘到边缘修复(TEER)治疗症状性二尖瓣反流的应用正在稳步增加。然而,心房颤动(AF)患者的TEER结果,包括再入院趋势,仍然未知。方法:查询2016年至2020年全国再入院数据库,以确定合并和不合并AF的TEER患者。然后使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和多变量回归模型对两组患者进行比较。结果包括住院死亡率、急性肾损伤(AKI)、心力衰竭、急性卒中、心肌梗死(MI)、术后出血(PPB)和心包填塞。结果:在研究期间共纳入39,867例TEER手术受术者,其中24,729例(62%)患有房颤,而15,138例(38%)无房颤诊断。经调整分析,房颤组住院死亡率、AKI、心力衰竭(HF)和术后出血(PPB)的发生率更高。相反,TEER合并AF组心肌梗死发生率较低,卒中和心包填塞风险两组相近。房颤组的指数住院中位时间(LOS)较未住院组更长(2天(IQR 5-1) vs 1天(IQR 3-1))。结论:与没有房颤的患者相比,TEER手术受者房颤与较差的预后相关,包括更高的住院死亡率、AKI和HF。两组在30,90和180天的再入院率相似。
{"title":"Readmission Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of Mitral Regurgitation With and Without Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity-Matched National Readmission Analysis.","authors":"Saliha Erdem, Amro Taha, Neel Patel, Anoop Titus, Muhammad Aamir, Yasemin Bahar, Yasar Sattar, Khola Waheed Khan, Waleed Alruwaili, Aneeza Jamshed, Nagib Chalfoun, Islam Y Elgendy, M Chadi Alraies","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000393","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000393","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for symptomatic mitral regurgitation is steadily increasing. However, the outcomes of TEER among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), including readmission trends, remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried between 2016 and 2020 to identify TEER patients with and without AF. The 2 groups were then compared using propensity score matching and multivariate regression models. The outcomes included inhospital mortality, ` (AKI), heart failure (HF), acute stroke, myocardial infarction, postprocedure bleeding, and cardiac tamponade.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39,867 TEER procedure recipients were included over the study period, of which, 24,729 (62%) had AF compared to 15,138 (38%) with no AF diagnosis. On adjusted analysis, the AF group had a higher rate of inpatient mortality, AKI, HF, and postprocedural bleeding. On the contrary, TEER with AF group had lower odds of myocardial infarction. The risk of stroke and cardiac tamponade was similar between the 2 groups. The median length of stay (LOS) at index hospitalization was longer in the AF cohort in comparison with those without [2 days (interquartile range: 5-1) vs. 1 day (interquartile range: 3-1)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AF in TEER procedure recipients was associated with worse outcomes including a higher rate of inpatient mortality, AKI, and HF compared with the patients without AF. Readmission rates at 30, 90, and 180 days were similar between the 2 groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144081141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-19DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000400
Ethan F Kramer, Jonathan Van Name, Rogina Rezk, Nicolas J Abchee, Emily P Meisel, Michelle Waples, Reece Frechette, Brandon R Allen, Mohammed Ruzieh
Background: There is uncertainty in the clinical utility of the HEART score, given its incorporation of an older generation of troponin assay. We sought to determine whether high-sensitivity troponin I (Hs-TnI) alone can effectively stratify cardiovascular risk in patients presenting to the emergency department with moderate or high HEART score by analyzing the management and outcomes of adults presenting to our emergency department with chest pain, moderate or high HEART score, and Hs-TnI below the 99th percentile.
Methods: For this population, we calculated the negative predictive value of Hs-TnI in ruling out a major adverse cardiac event (MACE; defined as myocardial infarction or death from a cardiovascular or unknown cause) at 30 days.
Results: The average HEART score was 5.1, and 1224 patients (92.0%) had a moderate HEART score (4-6) and 107 patients (8.0%) had a high HEART score (7+). The average age of patients was 59.0 years and 52.7% were women. The incidence of 30-day MACE was 0.2%. Overall, in this cohort of patients with moderate or high HEART score, Hs-TnI below the 99th percentile had a negative predictive value of 99.8% (95% confidence interval: 99.6%-100.0%) in ruling out MACE at 30 days.
Conclusion: Given the low event rate, a moderate or high HEART score should not be the sole determinant for admission when Hs-TnI is not elevated.
{"title":"Assessing the Utility of the HEART Score in the Era of High-Sensitivity Troponin.","authors":"Ethan F Kramer, Jonathan Van Name, Rogina Rezk, Nicolas J Abchee, Emily P Meisel, Michelle Waples, Reece Frechette, Brandon R Allen, Mohammed Ruzieh","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000400","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000400","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is uncertainty in the clinical utility of the HEART score, given its incorporation of an older generation of troponin assay. We sought to determine whether high-sensitivity troponin I (Hs-TnI) alone can effectively stratify cardiovascular risk in patients presenting to the emergency department with moderate or high HEART score by analyzing the management and outcomes of adults presenting to our emergency department with chest pain, moderate or high HEART score, and Hs-TnI below the 99th percentile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this population, we calculated the negative predictive value of Hs-TnI in ruling out a major adverse cardiac event (MACE; defined as myocardial infarction or death from a cardiovascular or unknown cause) at 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average HEART score was 5.1, and 1224 patients (92.0%) had a moderate HEART score (4-6) and 107 patients (8.0%) had a high HEART score (7+). The average age of patients was 59.0 years and 52.7% were women. The incidence of 30-day MACE was 0.2%. Overall, in this cohort of patients with moderate or high HEART score, Hs-TnI below the 99th percentile had a negative predictive value of 99.8% (95% confidence interval: 99.6%-100.0%) in ruling out MACE at 30 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the low event rate, a moderate or high HEART score should not be the sole determinant for admission when Hs-TnI is not elevated.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144875605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-28DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000404
Nameer Ascandar, Joshini Simon, Jeffrey P Steinhoff, Reetom Bera, Herschel Tian
Background: While peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a recognized risk factor for other macrovascular diseases, including coronary artery disease, the impact of PAD severity in patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains underexplored. Using a nationally representative cohort of patients admitted for AF, we examined clinical outcomes in those with different PAD severities and compared them to patients without PAD.
Methods: Data were obtained from the 2016 to 2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database to query all patients admitted for AF. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: No PAD (non-PAD), PAD, and critical limb ischemia (CLI). Multivariable regression models were constructed to adjust for patient and hospital-level factors and to examine the association between PAD severity and outcomes in patients admitted for AF.
Results: Out of 6,715,236 AF admissions, 4.5% had PAD, 0.3% had CLI, and the remaining were non-PAD. Following risk adjustment, in-hospital mortality was higher by 22% in PAD [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-1.39], and 264% in CLI (aOR, 3.64, 95% CI, 1.36-9.73), compared to non-PAD. Only PAD was linked with higher odds of acute ischemic stroke (aOR, 1.27, 95% CI, 1.12-1.44). However, the duration of hospital stay, hospitalization costs, and odds of nonhome discharge and 30-day nonelective readmissions were greater in patients with PAD and CLI compared to non-PAD patients.
Conclusion: Severe PAD was linked with significantly worse clinical outcomes, including higher in-hospital mortality, longer length of stay, incremental hospitalization costs, and higher 30-day nonelective readmission. These outcomes underscore the importance of early PAD management.
{"title":"Severity of Peripheral Artery Disease Predicting Clinical Outcomes and 30-day Nonelective Readmission in Patients Admitted for Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Nameer Ascandar, Joshini Simon, Jeffrey P Steinhoff, Reetom Bera, Herschel Tian","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000404","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000404","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a recognized risk factor for other macrovascular diseases, including coronary artery disease, the impact of PAD severity in patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains underexplored. Using a nationally representative cohort of patients admitted for AF, we examined clinical outcomes in those with different PAD severities and compared them to patients without PAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the 2016 to 2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database to query all patients admitted for AF. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: No PAD (non-PAD), PAD, and critical limb ischemia (CLI). Multivariable regression models were constructed to adjust for patient and hospital-level factors and to examine the association between PAD severity and outcomes in patients admitted for AF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 6,715,236 AF admissions, 4.5% had PAD, 0.3% had CLI, and the remaining were non-PAD. Following risk adjustment, in-hospital mortality was higher by 22% in PAD [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-1.39], and 264% in CLI (aOR, 3.64, 95% CI, 1.36-9.73), compared to non-PAD. Only PAD was linked with higher odds of acute ischemic stroke (aOR, 1.27, 95% CI, 1.12-1.44). However, the duration of hospital stay, hospitalization costs, and odds of nonhome discharge and 30-day nonelective readmissions were greater in patients with PAD and CLI compared to non-PAD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Severe PAD was linked with significantly worse clinical outcomes, including higher in-hospital mortality, longer length of stay, incremental hospitalization costs, and higher 30-day nonelective readmission. These outcomes underscore the importance of early PAD management.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145393849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-22DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000401
David E Winchester
Purpose: To describe the experience and results of adopting evidence-based teaching strategies in a cardiovascular system course for undergraduate medical students.
Material and methods: Evidence-based methods for teaching undergraduate medical students were combined with feedback from students to inform and implement several changes to the course structure, content, and teaching methods.
Results and conclusions: The course was restructured with new learning objectives, "mini-tracks," 30-minute lectures, and purposeful repetition. Active learning (AL) was increased to 32 of 101 learning activities AL (31.7%). The overall approval rating for the course substantially increased after changes were made. Course directors should periodically review their learning activities for opportunities to adopt evidence-based educational techniques.
{"title":"Reimagining the Undergraduate Medical Education Systems-Based Course: An Example for the Cardiovascular System.","authors":"David E Winchester","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000401","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000401","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the experience and results of adopting evidence-based teaching strategies in a cardiovascular system course for undergraduate medical students.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Evidence-based methods for teaching undergraduate medical students were combined with feedback from students to inform and implement several changes to the course structure, content, and teaching methods.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>The course was restructured with new learning objectives, \"mini-tracks,\" 30-minute lectures, and purposeful repetition. Active learning (AL) was increased to 32 of 101 learning activities AL (31.7%). The overall approval rating for the course substantially increased after changes were made. Course directors should periodically review their learning activities for opportunities to adopt evidence-based educational techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000405
Hannah Kirsch, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh, Mohammad Reza Movahed
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalization in the United States. The goal of this study was to evaluate contemporary population-level trends and demographic disparities in age-adjusted hospitalization rates for systolic heart failure (SHF) and diastolic heart failure (DHF).
Methods: We analyzed discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample database, years 2016 to 2020, for adults aged 20 and older. HF subtypes were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Age-adjusted hospitalization rates per 100,000 population were calculated and stratified by year, sex, and race.
Results: From 2016 to 2020, the age-adjusted DHF hospitalization rate increased from 219.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 201.4-237.1] to 303.1 (95% CI, 277.7-328.5) per 100,000. SHF rates rose from 211.7 (95% CI, 194.7-228.7) to 262.6 (95% CI, 240.6-284.6). Hospitalizations for SHF were more common in men than women across all years; in 2020, the SHF hospitalization rate in men was 370.6 (95% CI, 323.8-417.4) compared to 171.9 (95% CI, 152.6-191.1) in women. Black patients consistently had the highest SHF and DHF hospitalization rates. In 2020, the DHF rate among Blacks was 418.3 (95% CI, 328.9-507.7) versus 284.8 (95% CI, 255.0-314.6) among Whites, and the SHF rate was 403.6 (317.3-478.8) versus 227.5 (95% CI, 203.7-251.3), respectively.
Conclusions: SHF and DHF age-adjusted hospitalization rates are rising significantly, with pronounced disparities by sex and race. Men and Black patients are disproportionately impacted.
{"title":"Age-adjusted Trends in the Diastolic and Systolic Heart Failure in the United States Over Recent Years Based on Race and Gender, With Higher Trends in Men and African Americans.","authors":"Hannah Kirsch, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh, Mohammad Reza Movahed","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000405","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000405","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalization in the United States. The goal of this study was to evaluate contemporary population-level trends and demographic disparities in age-adjusted hospitalization rates for systolic heart failure (SHF) and diastolic heart failure (DHF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample database, years 2016 to 2020, for adults aged 20 and older. HF subtypes were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Age-adjusted hospitalization rates per 100,000 population were calculated and stratified by year, sex, and race.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2016 to 2020, the age-adjusted DHF hospitalization rate increased from 219.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 201.4-237.1] to 303.1 (95% CI, 277.7-328.5) per 100,000. SHF rates rose from 211.7 (95% CI, 194.7-228.7) to 262.6 (95% CI, 240.6-284.6). Hospitalizations for SHF were more common in men than women across all years; in 2020, the SHF hospitalization rate in men was 370.6 (95% CI, 323.8-417.4) compared to 171.9 (95% CI, 152.6-191.1) in women. Black patients consistently had the highest SHF and DHF hospitalization rates. In 2020, the DHF rate among Blacks was 418.3 (95% CI, 328.9-507.7) versus 284.8 (95% CI, 255.0-314.6) among Whites, and the SHF rate was 403.6 (317.3-478.8) versus 227.5 (95% CI, 203.7-251.3), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SHF and DHF age-adjusted hospitalization rates are rising significantly, with pronounced disparities by sex and race. Men and Black patients are disproportionately impacted.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":"24 4","pages":"e0405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145655623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-03-10DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000388
Abdalhakim Shubietah, Ameer Awashra, Fathi Milhem, Mohammad Ghannam, Moath Hattab, Islam Rajab, Haroun Neiroukh, Massa Zahdeh, Ahmad Nouri, Abdalrahman Assaassa, Kiran Nair, Ankit Sahni, Anan Abu Rmilah
Hyperuricemia, characterized by elevated serum uric acid levels, has been linked to cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, metabolic syndrome, and coronary artery disease. This relationship, however, is complex; while some studies indicate a strong association, others suggest that it may be influenced by confounding factors. The rising global prevalence of hyperuricemia underscores the necessity for a deeper understanding of its cardiovascular implications. Hyperuricemia results from an imbalance in uric acid production and excretion, driven by dietary factors, obesity, insulin resistance, and other conditions. Elevated uric acid levels contribute to cardiovascular risk through mechanisms such as inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. This review highlights the importance of ongoing research to clarify hyperuricemia's role in cardiovascular disease and suggests that urate-lowering therapies, such as xanthine oxidase inhibitors, may confer cardiovascular benefits; however, evidence remains conflicting. The Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol in Patients with Gout and Cardiovascular Morbidities (CARES) trial indicated an increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality with febuxostat compared with allopurinol, raising safety concerns. In contrast, the Febuxostat versus Allopurinol Streamlined Trial (FAST) demonstrated that febuxostat was noninferior to allopurinol, with even lower all-cause mortality. These opposing findings emphasize the complexity of treatment decisions and the need for individualized management strategies for hyperuricemia. Clinical decisions should consider individual patient risks and characteristics. Ultimately, this comprehensive analysis aims to enhance prevention and management strategies for cardiovascular diseases related to hyperuricemia. The overview includes discussions on major studies such as the Framingham Heart Study, CARES, FAST, PRIZE, and FREED trials, examining their results. It explores whether hyperuricemia is a causal factor versus an associated risk factor and whether it serves as a marker or mediator of disease. Additionally, the review addresses novel biomarkers and predictive models, the management of hyperuricemia in the context of cardiovascular risk, the role of urate-lowering therapies in cardiovascular disease, variability in guidelines and recommendations, and the impact of hyperuricemia in special populations such as those with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The cardiovascular risk associated with hyperuricemia across various demographics is also discussed. Furthermore, the review suggests that existing risk scores might be modified to include uric acid levels in patients with hyperuricemia.
{"title":"Hyperuricemia and Cardiovascular Risk: Insights and Implications.","authors":"Abdalhakim Shubietah, Ameer Awashra, Fathi Milhem, Mohammad Ghannam, Moath Hattab, Islam Rajab, Haroun Neiroukh, Massa Zahdeh, Ahmad Nouri, Abdalrahman Assaassa, Kiran Nair, Ankit Sahni, Anan Abu Rmilah","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000388","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000388","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hyperuricemia, characterized by elevated serum uric acid levels, has been linked to cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, metabolic syndrome, and coronary artery disease. This relationship, however, is complex; while some studies indicate a strong association, others suggest that it may be influenced by confounding factors. The rising global prevalence of hyperuricemia underscores the necessity for a deeper understanding of its cardiovascular implications. Hyperuricemia results from an imbalance in uric acid production and excretion, driven by dietary factors, obesity, insulin resistance, and other conditions. Elevated uric acid levels contribute to cardiovascular risk through mechanisms such as inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. This review highlights the importance of ongoing research to clarify hyperuricemia's role in cardiovascular disease and suggests that urate-lowering therapies, such as xanthine oxidase inhibitors, may confer cardiovascular benefits; however, evidence remains conflicting. The Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol in Patients with Gout and Cardiovascular Morbidities (CARES) trial indicated an increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality with febuxostat compared with allopurinol, raising safety concerns. In contrast, the Febuxostat versus Allopurinol Streamlined Trial (FAST) demonstrated that febuxostat was noninferior to allopurinol, with even lower all-cause mortality. These opposing findings emphasize the complexity of treatment decisions and the need for individualized management strategies for hyperuricemia. Clinical decisions should consider individual patient risks and characteristics. Ultimately, this comprehensive analysis aims to enhance prevention and management strategies for cardiovascular diseases related to hyperuricemia. The overview includes discussions on major studies such as the Framingham Heart Study, CARES, FAST, PRIZE, and FREED trials, examining their results. It explores whether hyperuricemia is a causal factor versus an associated risk factor and whether it serves as a marker or mediator of disease. Additionally, the review addresses novel biomarkers and predictive models, the management of hyperuricemia in the context of cardiovascular risk, the role of urate-lowering therapies in cardiovascular disease, variability in guidelines and recommendations, and the impact of hyperuricemia in special populations such as those with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The cardiovascular risk associated with hyperuricemia across various demographics is also discussed. Furthermore, the review suggests that existing risk scores might be modified to include uric acid levels in patients with hyperuricemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0388"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143587574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-05-29DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000395
Raymond D Bahr, Frank Breuckmann
Chest discomfort before severe chest pain represents a clinical ischemia marker and indicates live myocardium in jeopardy and often precedes cardiac arrest or acute myocardial infarction (MI). The intermittent or stuttering symptoms that precede MI are referred to as "prodromal symptoms." These symptoms have been shown to correlate with cyclic ST changes and repeated episodes of spontaneous reperfusion and occlusion, occurring during a period of hours or days before the acute ischemia precedes to death or heart damage. These symptoms of premonitory angina have been associated with improved outcomes due to ischemic preconditioning or opening of collateral vascular channels around the area of ischemia. Acute prevention of an MI through prodromal symptoms recognition represents the opportunity for significantly reducing heart attack deaths. The early heart attack care program puts emphasis on prodromal symptom recognition and allows a shift in time backward to prevent the ischemic process from proceeding to MI. This strategy has been shown to pick up 15% of the patients with ischemia in the low probability group and to reduce inappropriate admissions to the hospital, as well as to reduce the number of patients with missed MIs being sent home from the emergency department.
{"title":"Acute Prevention of the Heart Attack: The Identification of Prodromal Symptom Recognition as the \"Rosetta Stone\" in Decoding the Heart Attack Problem.","authors":"Raymond D Bahr, Frank Breuckmann","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000395","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000395","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chest discomfort before severe chest pain represents a clinical ischemia marker and indicates live myocardium in jeopardy and often precedes cardiac arrest or acute myocardial infarction (MI). The intermittent or stuttering symptoms that precede MI are referred to as \"prodromal symptoms.\" These symptoms have been shown to correlate with cyclic ST changes and repeated episodes of spontaneous reperfusion and occlusion, occurring during a period of hours or days before the acute ischemia precedes to death or heart damage. These symptoms of premonitory angina have been associated with improved outcomes due to ischemic preconditioning or opening of collateral vascular channels around the area of ischemia. Acute prevention of an MI through prodromal symptoms recognition represents the opportunity for significantly reducing heart attack deaths. The early heart attack care program puts emphasis on prodromal symptom recognition and allows a shift in time backward to prevent the ischemic process from proceeding to MI. This strategy has been shown to pick up 15% of the patients with ischemia in the low probability group and to reduce inappropriate admissions to the hospital, as well as to reduce the number of patients with missed MIs being sent home from the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144175126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-04-28DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000390
Nicklaus P Ashburn, Anna C Snavely, Molly R Ehrig, Michael D Shapiro, David M Herrington, David M Reboussin, Sabina B Gesell, Simon A Mahler
Background: Hyperlipidemia (HLD) is a major contributor to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Nearly 30% of emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain have undiagnosed and/or unmanaged HLD, putting them at an increased risk of ASCVD. Although safe and effective HLD treatments exist, the ED traditionally focuses on acute care and does not offer preventive cardiovascular care services. This represents a large, missed opportunity to improve cardiovascular health for the millions of Americans evaluated in the ED each year who are not receiving appropriate preventive care in the outpatient setting. The goals of this study are to determine the efficacy of novel ED-initiated preventive care on lowering cholesterol while also informing our understanding of patient adherence and implementation determinants of ED-initiated preventive cardiovascular care.
Methods: We will use a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial of 130 ED patients being evaluated for acute coronary syndrome at a single site. Participants will be 40-75 years old with prior ASCVD, known diabetes, or 10-year ASCVD risk ≥7.5% who are not already receiving guideline-directed outpatient preventive care. Patients will be randomized with equal probability to EMERALD (Emergency Medicine Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Lipid Disorders) or usual care. Patients in the EMERALD arm will be started on a statin and referred for a 30-day follow-up with cardiology or primary care, depending on the 10-year ASCVD risk level. Usual care arm patients will not be prescribed a statin in the ED and will be asked to follow up with a primary care provider. The primary outcome will be a percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 30 days. Secondary outcomes include percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 180 days and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 30- and 180 days, the proportion of EMERALD patients who pick up their statin, and the proportion of patients who attend 30-day outpatient follow-up. We will also use mixed methods and semistructured interviews to identify patient adherence facilitators and barriers and implementation determinants for Emergency Medicine providers.
Discussion: This is the first study to evaluate a novel, protocolized ED-initiated preventive cardiovascular care approach for HLD. If successful, the EMERALD intervention may be able to improve the cardiovascular health for at-risk patients and serve as a use case for other modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension, tobacco use, and obesity. This single-site study will inform a planned multisite trial.
{"title":"Initiating Preventive Care for Hyperlipidemia in the Emergency Department: The Emergency Medicine Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Lipid Disorders Trial.","authors":"Nicklaus P Ashburn, Anna C Snavely, Molly R Ehrig, Michael D Shapiro, David M Herrington, David M Reboussin, Sabina B Gesell, Simon A Mahler","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000390","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000390","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperlipidemia (HLD) is a major contributor to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Nearly 30% of emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain have undiagnosed and/or unmanaged HLD, putting them at an increased risk of ASCVD. Although safe and effective HLD treatments exist, the ED traditionally focuses on acute care and does not offer preventive cardiovascular care services. This represents a large, missed opportunity to improve cardiovascular health for the millions of Americans evaluated in the ED each year who are not receiving appropriate preventive care in the outpatient setting. The goals of this study are to determine the efficacy of novel ED-initiated preventive care on lowering cholesterol while also informing our understanding of patient adherence and implementation determinants of ED-initiated preventive cardiovascular care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will use a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial of 130 ED patients being evaluated for acute coronary syndrome at a single site. Participants will be 40-75 years old with prior ASCVD, known diabetes, or 10-year ASCVD risk ≥7.5% who are not already receiving guideline-directed outpatient preventive care. Patients will be randomized with equal probability to EMERALD (Emergency Medicine Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Lipid Disorders) or usual care. Patients in the EMERALD arm will be started on a statin and referred for a 30-day follow-up with cardiology or primary care, depending on the 10-year ASCVD risk level. Usual care arm patients will not be prescribed a statin in the ED and will be asked to follow up with a primary care provider. The primary outcome will be a percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 30 days. Secondary outcomes include percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 180 days and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 30- and 180 days, the proportion of EMERALD patients who pick up their statin, and the proportion of patients who attend 30-day outpatient follow-up. We will also use mixed methods and semistructured interviews to identify patient adherence facilitators and barriers and implementation determinants for Emergency Medicine providers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is the first study to evaluate a novel, protocolized ED-initiated preventive cardiovascular care approach for HLD. If successful, the EMERALD intervention may be able to improve the cardiovascular health for at-risk patients and serve as a use case for other modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension, tobacco use, and obesity. This single-site study will inform a planned multisite trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":"24 3","pages":"e0390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353110/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-04-30DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000391
Abdul Rasheed Bahar, Yasemin Bahar, Paawanjot Kaur, George Kidess, Mohamad Hasan Jawadi, Mohamed S Alrayyashi, Olayiwola Bolaji, Timir K Paul, M Chadi Alraies
Background: Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is defined as myocardial infarction with <50% stenosis of coronary arteries. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that may influence MINOCA outcomes.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2021), identifying MINOCA patients with and without AF using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression and propensity score matching were applied to control for confounders and assess outcomes.
Results: Of 94,840 MINOCA patients, 28,270 (30%) had AF. AF was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (3.74% vs. 2.75%; P = 0.004), acute heart failure (38.33% vs. 34.97%; P < 0.001), sudden cardiac arrest (2.54% vs. 1.73%; P < 0.050), and cardiogenic shock (3.11% vs. 1.56%; P < 0.001). AF independently predicted in-hospital mortality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-1.58; P < 0.001], heart failure (aOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.38-1.59; P < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.48-2.30; P < 0.001), and acute kidney injury (aOR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.24; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in percutaneous coronary intervention, mechanical circulatory support, or defibrillator use ( P > 0.050).
Conclusions: AF in MINOCA is associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, including mortality, sheart failure, acute kidney injury, and cardiogenic shock. AF may be a key prognostic marker in this population, warranting further research.
{"title":"Implications of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.","authors":"Abdul Rasheed Bahar, Yasemin Bahar, Paawanjot Kaur, George Kidess, Mohamad Hasan Jawadi, Mohamed S Alrayyashi, Olayiwola Bolaji, Timir K Paul, M Chadi Alraies","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000391","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is defined as myocardial infarction with <50% stenosis of coronary arteries. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that may influence MINOCA outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2021), identifying MINOCA patients with and without AF using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression and propensity score matching were applied to control for confounders and assess outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 94,840 MINOCA patients, 28,270 (30%) had AF. AF was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (3.74% vs. 2.75%; P = 0.004), acute heart failure (38.33% vs. 34.97%; P < 0.001), sudden cardiac arrest (2.54% vs. 1.73%; P < 0.050), and cardiogenic shock (3.11% vs. 1.56%; P < 0.001). AF independently predicted in-hospital mortality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-1.58; P < 0.001], heart failure (aOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.38-1.59; P < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.48-2.30; P < 0.001), and acute kidney injury (aOR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.24; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in percutaneous coronary intervention, mechanical circulatory support, or defibrillator use ( P > 0.050).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AF in MINOCA is associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, including mortality, sheart failure, acute kidney injury, and cardiogenic shock. AF may be a key prognostic marker in this population, warranting further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144050832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}