Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-08-22DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000401
David E Winchester
Purpose: To describe the experience and results of adopting evidence-based teaching strategies in a cardiovascular system course for undergraduate medical students.
Material and methods: Evidence-based methods for teaching undergraduate medical students were combined with feedback from students to inform and implement several changes to the course structure, content, and teaching methods.
Results and conclusions: The course was restructured with new learning objectives, "mini-tracks," 30-minute lectures, and purposeful repetition. Active learning (AL) was increased to 32 of 101 learning activities AL (31.7%). The overall approval rating for the course substantially increased after changes were made. Course directors should periodically review their learning activities for opportunities to adopt evidence-based educational techniques.
{"title":"Reimagining the Undergraduate Medical Education Systems-Based Course: An Example for the Cardiovascular System.","authors":"David E Winchester","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000401","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000401","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the experience and results of adopting evidence-based teaching strategies in a cardiovascular system course for undergraduate medical students.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Evidence-based methods for teaching undergraduate medical students were combined with feedback from students to inform and implement several changes to the course structure, content, and teaching methods.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>The course was restructured with new learning objectives, \"mini-tracks,\" 30-minute lectures, and purposeful repetition. Active learning (AL) was increased to 32 of 101 learning activities AL (31.7%). The overall approval rating for the course substantially increased after changes were made. Course directors should periodically review their learning activities for opportunities to adopt evidence-based educational techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-29DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000405
Hannah Kirsch, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh, Mohammad Reza Movahed
Background: Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalization in the United States. The goal of this study was to evaluate contemporary population-level trends and demographic disparities in age-adjusted hospitalization rates for systolic heart failure (SHF) and diastolic heart failure (DHF).
Methods: We analyzed discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample database, years 2016 to 2020, for adults aged 20 and older. HF subtypes were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Age-adjusted hospitalization rates per 100,000 population were calculated and stratified by year, sex, and race.
Results: From 2016 to 2020, the age-adjusted DHF hospitalization rate increased from 219.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 201.4-237.1] to 303.1 (95% CI, 277.7-328.5) per 100,000. SHF rates rose from 211.7 (95% CI, 194.7-228.7) to 262.6 (95% CI, 240.6-284.6). Hospitalizations for SHF were more common in men than women across all years; in 2020, the SHF hospitalization rate in men was 370.6 (95% CI, 323.8-417.4) compared to 171.9 (95% CI, 152.6-191.1) in women. Black patients consistently had the highest SHF and DHF hospitalization rates. In 2020, the DHF rate among Blacks was 418.3 (95% CI, 328.9-507.7) versus 284.8 (95% CI, 255.0-314.6) among Whites, and the SHF rate was 403.6 (317.3-478.8) versus 227.5 (95% CI, 203.7-251.3), respectively.
Conclusions: SHF and DHF age-adjusted hospitalization rates are rising significantly, with pronounced disparities by sex and race. Men and Black patients are disproportionately impacted.
{"title":"Age-adjusted Trends in the Diastolic and Systolic Heart Failure in the United States Over Recent Years Based on Race and Gender, With Higher Trends in Men and African Americans.","authors":"Hannah Kirsch, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh, Mohammad Reza Movahed","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000405","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000405","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalization in the United States. The goal of this study was to evaluate contemporary population-level trends and demographic disparities in age-adjusted hospitalization rates for systolic heart failure (SHF) and diastolic heart failure (DHF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample database, years 2016 to 2020, for adults aged 20 and older. HF subtypes were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Age-adjusted hospitalization rates per 100,000 population were calculated and stratified by year, sex, and race.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2016 to 2020, the age-adjusted DHF hospitalization rate increased from 219.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 201.4-237.1] to 303.1 (95% CI, 277.7-328.5) per 100,000. SHF rates rose from 211.7 (95% CI, 194.7-228.7) to 262.6 (95% CI, 240.6-284.6). Hospitalizations for SHF were more common in men than women across all years; in 2020, the SHF hospitalization rate in men was 370.6 (95% CI, 323.8-417.4) compared to 171.9 (95% CI, 152.6-191.1) in women. Black patients consistently had the highest SHF and DHF hospitalization rates. In 2020, the DHF rate among Blacks was 418.3 (95% CI, 328.9-507.7) versus 284.8 (95% CI, 255.0-314.6) among Whites, and the SHF rate was 403.6 (317.3-478.8) versus 227.5 (95% CI, 203.7-251.3), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SHF and DHF age-adjusted hospitalization rates are rising significantly, with pronounced disparities by sex and race. Men and Black patients are disproportionately impacted.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":"24 4","pages":"e0405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145655623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-04DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000407
Sufyan Shahid, Shehroze Tabassum, Muhammad Abdullah Ali, Umama Alam, Zoya Ejaz, Zaryab Bacha, Subtain Haider Solahri, Hritvik Jain, Salman Khalid, Raheel Ahmed
Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation-related sudden cardiac death (SCD) account for nearly 450,000 deaths annually in the United States. Catheter ablation (CA) and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are commonly used to manage VT recurrence; however, their comparative efficacy and safety remain uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CA and AADs in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL Library were searched up to February 15, 2025. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, VT storm, and appropriate ICD shock. Secondary outcomes included inappropriate ICD shock, appropriate antitachycardia pacing (ATP), heart failure hospitalization, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and myocardial infarction (MI). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Three RCTs encompassing 587 patients (287 CA, 300 AADs) were included. No significant differences were found between CA and AADs in all-cause mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.63-1.22; p=0.43), cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.23, 95% CI: 0.77-1.98; p=0.39), VT storm (RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.39-1.46; p=0.41), or appropriate ICD shock (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69-1.10; p=0.24). Secondary outcomes, including inappropriate ICD shock, ATP, heart failure hospitalization, stroke/TIA, and MI, were also comparable between the two groups. In this meta-analysis of RCTs, CA and AADs demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety in patients with VT. Larger high-quality trials are warranted to confirm these findings and further define the role of CA as a potential first-line therapy.
{"title":"Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Ventricular Tachycardia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sufyan Shahid, Shehroze Tabassum, Muhammad Abdullah Ali, Umama Alam, Zoya Ejaz, Zaryab Bacha, Subtain Haider Solahri, Hritvik Jain, Salman Khalid, Raheel Ahmed","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000407","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000407","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation-related sudden cardiac death (SCD) account for nearly 450,000 deaths annually in the United States. Catheter ablation (CA) and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are commonly used to manage VT recurrence; however, their comparative efficacy and safety remain uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CA and AADs in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL Library were searched up to February 15, 2025. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, VT storm, and appropriate ICD shock. Secondary outcomes included inappropriate ICD shock, appropriate antitachycardia pacing (ATP), heart failure hospitalization, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), and myocardial infarction (MI). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Three RCTs encompassing 587 patients (287 CA, 300 AADs) were included. No significant differences were found between CA and AADs in all-cause mortality (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.63-1.22; p=0.43), cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.23, 95% CI: 0.77-1.98; p=0.39), VT storm (RR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.39-1.46; p=0.41), or appropriate ICD shock (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69-1.10; p=0.24). Secondary outcomes, including inappropriate ICD shock, ATP, heart failure hospitalization, stroke/TIA, and MI, were also comparable between the two groups. In this meta-analysis of RCTs, CA and AADs demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety in patients with VT. Larger high-quality trials are warranted to confirm these findings and further define the role of CA as a potential first-line therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145446001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-09DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000406
Prakash Upreti, Ankit Hanmandlu, Abdul Rasheed Bahar, Mohammad Hamza, Mustafa Turkmani, Azeem Rathore, Jawad Basit, Kripa Rajak, Farah Yasmin, Salman Abdul Basit, Chadi Alraies
Background: Despite the clinical guidelines favoring medical therapy for stable angina, the optimal management of these patients remains unclear. Here, we compare medical management (MM) versus PCI in patients with stable angina.
Methods: An extensive literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interest. Data were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR).
Results: Our meta-analysis of 28 RCTs included 9,346 PCI patients and 9,503 medically managed patients. The mean age was 62.5 ± 7.6 years in the PCI group and 62.8 ± 7.4 years in the other group. Men comprised 68% and 70% of PCI and MM groups, respectively.Over a mean follow-up of 2.64 years, PCI was associated with a significantly lower incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) compared to medical management (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.96, p = 0.01). Although PCI showed trends toward lower odds of unplanned revascularizations and major adverse cardiovascular events, these differences were not statistically significant. There were no differences in outcomes of freedom from angina, unstable angina, nonfatal MI, stroke, all-cause mortality, or CV death.
Conclusion: Advances in cardiovascular imaging and catheterization techniques have improved risk stratification and outcomes of PCI in stable angina. Further research is needed to identify clinical subgroups that benefit most from each treatment modality.
背景:尽管临床指南倾向于稳定型心绞痛的药物治疗,但这些患者的最佳治疗方法仍不清楚。在这里,我们比较了稳定型心绞痛患者的医疗管理(MM)与PCI。方法:使用PubMed和Embase进行广泛的文献检索,以确定感兴趣的随机对照试验(rct)。数据提取和分析使用随机效应模型计算合并优势比(OR)。结果:我们对28项随机对照试验的荟萃分析包括9346例PCI患者和9503例医学管理患者。PCI组患者平均年龄为62.5±7.6岁,另一组患者平均年龄为62.8±7.4岁。男性分别占PCI组和MM组的68%和70%。在平均2.64年的随访中,与内科治疗相比,PCI与心肌梗死(MI)发生率显著降低相关(OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.96, p = 0.01)。尽管PCI显示出意外血运重建和主要不良心血管事件发生率较低的趋势,但这些差异没有统计学意义。无心绞痛、不稳定型心绞痛、非致死性心肌梗死、卒中、全因死亡率或CV死亡的结果没有差异。结论:心血管影像学和导管技术的进步改善了稳定型心绞痛PCI的风险分层和预后。需要进一步的研究来确定从每种治疗方式中获益最多的临床亚组。
{"title":"Medical management vs PCI in patients with stable angina: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Prakash Upreti, Ankit Hanmandlu, Abdul Rasheed Bahar, Mohammad Hamza, Mustafa Turkmani, Azeem Rathore, Jawad Basit, Kripa Rajak, Farah Yasmin, Salman Abdul Basit, Chadi Alraies","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000406","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000406","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the clinical guidelines favoring medical therapy for stable angina, the optimal management of these patients remains unclear. Here, we compare medical management (MM) versus PCI in patients with stable angina.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive literature search was conducted using PubMed and Embase to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interest. Data were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our meta-analysis of 28 RCTs included 9,346 PCI patients and 9,503 medically managed patients. The mean age was 62.5 ± 7.6 years in the PCI group and 62.8 ± 7.4 years in the other group. Men comprised 68% and 70% of PCI and MM groups, respectively.Over a mean follow-up of 2.64 years, PCI was associated with a significantly lower incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) compared to medical management (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.96, p = 0.01). Although PCI showed trends toward lower odds of unplanned revascularizations and major adverse cardiovascular events, these differences were not statistically significant. There were no differences in outcomes of freedom from angina, unstable angina, nonfatal MI, stroke, all-cause mortality, or CV death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advances in cardiovascular imaging and catheterization techniques have improved risk stratification and outcomes of PCI in stable angina. Further research is needed to identify clinical subgroups that benefit most from each treatment modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-03-10DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000388
Abdalhakim Shubietah, Ameer Awashra, Fathi Milhem, Mohammad Ghannam, Moath Hattab, Islam Rajab, Haroun Neiroukh, Massa Zahdeh, Ahmad Nouri, Abdalrahman Assaassa, Kiran Nair, Ankit Sahni, Anan Abu Rmilah
Hyperuricemia, characterized by elevated serum uric acid levels, has been linked to cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, metabolic syndrome, and coronary artery disease. This relationship, however, is complex; while some studies indicate a strong association, others suggest that it may be influenced by confounding factors. The rising global prevalence of hyperuricemia underscores the necessity for a deeper understanding of its cardiovascular implications. Hyperuricemia results from an imbalance in uric acid production and excretion, driven by dietary factors, obesity, insulin resistance, and other conditions. Elevated uric acid levels contribute to cardiovascular risk through mechanisms such as inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. This review highlights the importance of ongoing research to clarify hyperuricemia's role in cardiovascular disease and suggests that urate-lowering therapies, such as xanthine oxidase inhibitors, may confer cardiovascular benefits; however, evidence remains conflicting. The Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol in Patients with Gout and Cardiovascular Morbidities (CARES) trial indicated an increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality with febuxostat compared with allopurinol, raising safety concerns. In contrast, the Febuxostat versus Allopurinol Streamlined Trial (FAST) demonstrated that febuxostat was noninferior to allopurinol, with even lower all-cause mortality. These opposing findings emphasize the complexity of treatment decisions and the need for individualized management strategies for hyperuricemia. Clinical decisions should consider individual patient risks and characteristics. Ultimately, this comprehensive analysis aims to enhance prevention and management strategies for cardiovascular diseases related to hyperuricemia. The overview includes discussions on major studies such as the Framingham Heart Study, CARES, FAST, PRIZE, and FREED trials, examining their results. It explores whether hyperuricemia is a causal factor versus an associated risk factor and whether it serves as a marker or mediator of disease. Additionally, the review addresses novel biomarkers and predictive models, the management of hyperuricemia in the context of cardiovascular risk, the role of urate-lowering therapies in cardiovascular disease, variability in guidelines and recommendations, and the impact of hyperuricemia in special populations such as those with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The cardiovascular risk associated with hyperuricemia across various demographics is also discussed. Furthermore, the review suggests that existing risk scores might be modified to include uric acid levels in patients with hyperuricemia.
{"title":"Hyperuricemia and Cardiovascular Risk: Insights and Implications.","authors":"Abdalhakim Shubietah, Ameer Awashra, Fathi Milhem, Mohammad Ghannam, Moath Hattab, Islam Rajab, Haroun Neiroukh, Massa Zahdeh, Ahmad Nouri, Abdalrahman Assaassa, Kiran Nair, Ankit Sahni, Anan Abu Rmilah","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000388","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000388","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hyperuricemia, characterized by elevated serum uric acid levels, has been linked to cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, metabolic syndrome, and coronary artery disease. This relationship, however, is complex; while some studies indicate a strong association, others suggest that it may be influenced by confounding factors. The rising global prevalence of hyperuricemia underscores the necessity for a deeper understanding of its cardiovascular implications. Hyperuricemia results from an imbalance in uric acid production and excretion, driven by dietary factors, obesity, insulin resistance, and other conditions. Elevated uric acid levels contribute to cardiovascular risk through mechanisms such as inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. This review highlights the importance of ongoing research to clarify hyperuricemia's role in cardiovascular disease and suggests that urate-lowering therapies, such as xanthine oxidase inhibitors, may confer cardiovascular benefits; however, evidence remains conflicting. The Cardiovascular Safety of Febuxostat and Allopurinol in Patients with Gout and Cardiovascular Morbidities (CARES) trial indicated an increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality with febuxostat compared with allopurinol, raising safety concerns. In contrast, the Febuxostat versus Allopurinol Streamlined Trial (FAST) demonstrated that febuxostat was noninferior to allopurinol, with even lower all-cause mortality. These opposing findings emphasize the complexity of treatment decisions and the need for individualized management strategies for hyperuricemia. Clinical decisions should consider individual patient risks and characteristics. Ultimately, this comprehensive analysis aims to enhance prevention and management strategies for cardiovascular diseases related to hyperuricemia. The overview includes discussions on major studies such as the Framingham Heart Study, CARES, FAST, PRIZE, and FREED trials, examining their results. It explores whether hyperuricemia is a causal factor versus an associated risk factor and whether it serves as a marker or mediator of disease. Additionally, the review addresses novel biomarkers and predictive models, the management of hyperuricemia in the context of cardiovascular risk, the role of urate-lowering therapies in cardiovascular disease, variability in guidelines and recommendations, and the impact of hyperuricemia in special populations such as those with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The cardiovascular risk associated with hyperuricemia across various demographics is also discussed. Furthermore, the review suggests that existing risk scores might be modified to include uric acid levels in patients with hyperuricemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0388"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143587574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-05-29DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000395
Raymond D Bahr, Frank Breuckmann
Chest discomfort before severe chest pain represents a clinical ischemia marker and indicates live myocardium in jeopardy and often precedes cardiac arrest or acute myocardial infarction (MI). The intermittent or stuttering symptoms that precede MI are referred to as "prodromal symptoms." These symptoms have been shown to correlate with cyclic ST changes and repeated episodes of spontaneous reperfusion and occlusion, occurring during a period of hours or days before the acute ischemia precedes to death or heart damage. These symptoms of premonitory angina have been associated with improved outcomes due to ischemic preconditioning or opening of collateral vascular channels around the area of ischemia. Acute prevention of an MI through prodromal symptoms recognition represents the opportunity for significantly reducing heart attack deaths. The early heart attack care program puts emphasis on prodromal symptom recognition and allows a shift in time backward to prevent the ischemic process from proceeding to MI. This strategy has been shown to pick up 15% of the patients with ischemia in the low probability group and to reduce inappropriate admissions to the hospital, as well as to reduce the number of patients with missed MIs being sent home from the emergency department.
{"title":"Acute Prevention of the Heart Attack: The Identification of Prodromal Symptom Recognition as the \"Rosetta Stone\" in Decoding the Heart Attack Problem.","authors":"Raymond D Bahr, Frank Breuckmann","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000395","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000395","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chest discomfort before severe chest pain represents a clinical ischemia marker and indicates live myocardium in jeopardy and often precedes cardiac arrest or acute myocardial infarction (MI). The intermittent or stuttering symptoms that precede MI are referred to as \"prodromal symptoms.\" These symptoms have been shown to correlate with cyclic ST changes and repeated episodes of spontaneous reperfusion and occlusion, occurring during a period of hours or days before the acute ischemia precedes to death or heart damage. These symptoms of premonitory angina have been associated with improved outcomes due to ischemic preconditioning or opening of collateral vascular channels around the area of ischemia. Acute prevention of an MI through prodromal symptoms recognition represents the opportunity for significantly reducing heart attack deaths. The early heart attack care program puts emphasis on prodromal symptom recognition and allows a shift in time backward to prevent the ischemic process from proceeding to MI. This strategy has been shown to pick up 15% of the patients with ischemia in the low probability group and to reduce inappropriate admissions to the hospital, as well as to reduce the number of patients with missed MIs being sent home from the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144175126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-04-28DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000390
Nicklaus P Ashburn, Anna C Snavely, Molly R Ehrig, Michael D Shapiro, David M Herrington, David M Reboussin, Sabina B Gesell, Simon A Mahler
Background: Hyperlipidemia (HLD) is a major contributor to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Nearly 30% of emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain have undiagnosed and/or unmanaged HLD, putting them at an increased risk of ASCVD. Although safe and effective HLD treatments exist, the ED traditionally focuses on acute care and does not offer preventive cardiovascular care services. This represents a large, missed opportunity to improve cardiovascular health for the millions of Americans evaluated in the ED each year who are not receiving appropriate preventive care in the outpatient setting. The goals of this study are to determine the efficacy of novel ED-initiated preventive care on lowering cholesterol while also informing our understanding of patient adherence and implementation determinants of ED-initiated preventive cardiovascular care.
Methods: We will use a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial of 130 ED patients being evaluated for acute coronary syndrome at a single site. Participants will be 40-75 years old with prior ASCVD, known diabetes, or 10-year ASCVD risk ≥7.5% who are not already receiving guideline-directed outpatient preventive care. Patients will be randomized with equal probability to EMERALD (Emergency Medicine Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Lipid Disorders) or usual care. Patients in the EMERALD arm will be started on a statin and referred for a 30-day follow-up with cardiology or primary care, depending on the 10-year ASCVD risk level. Usual care arm patients will not be prescribed a statin in the ED and will be asked to follow up with a primary care provider. The primary outcome will be a percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 30 days. Secondary outcomes include percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 180 days and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 30- and 180 days, the proportion of EMERALD patients who pick up their statin, and the proportion of patients who attend 30-day outpatient follow-up. We will also use mixed methods and semistructured interviews to identify patient adherence facilitators and barriers and implementation determinants for Emergency Medicine providers.
Discussion: This is the first study to evaluate a novel, protocolized ED-initiated preventive cardiovascular care approach for HLD. If successful, the EMERALD intervention may be able to improve the cardiovascular health for at-risk patients and serve as a use case for other modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension, tobacco use, and obesity. This single-site study will inform a planned multisite trial.
{"title":"Initiating Preventive Care for Hyperlipidemia in the Emergency Department: The Emergency Medicine Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Lipid Disorders Trial.","authors":"Nicklaus P Ashburn, Anna C Snavely, Molly R Ehrig, Michael D Shapiro, David M Herrington, David M Reboussin, Sabina B Gesell, Simon A Mahler","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000390","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000390","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperlipidemia (HLD) is a major contributor to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Nearly 30% of emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain have undiagnosed and/or unmanaged HLD, putting them at an increased risk of ASCVD. Although safe and effective HLD treatments exist, the ED traditionally focuses on acute care and does not offer preventive cardiovascular care services. This represents a large, missed opportunity to improve cardiovascular health for the millions of Americans evaluated in the ED each year who are not receiving appropriate preventive care in the outpatient setting. The goals of this study are to determine the efficacy of novel ED-initiated preventive care on lowering cholesterol while also informing our understanding of patient adherence and implementation determinants of ED-initiated preventive cardiovascular care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will use a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial of 130 ED patients being evaluated for acute coronary syndrome at a single site. Participants will be 40-75 years old with prior ASCVD, known diabetes, or 10-year ASCVD risk ≥7.5% who are not already receiving guideline-directed outpatient preventive care. Patients will be randomized with equal probability to EMERALD (Emergency Medicine Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Lipid Disorders) or usual care. Patients in the EMERALD arm will be started on a statin and referred for a 30-day follow-up with cardiology or primary care, depending on the 10-year ASCVD risk level. Usual care arm patients will not be prescribed a statin in the ED and will be asked to follow up with a primary care provider. The primary outcome will be a percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 30 days. Secondary outcomes include percent change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 180 days and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 30- and 180 days, the proportion of EMERALD patients who pick up their statin, and the proportion of patients who attend 30-day outpatient follow-up. We will also use mixed methods and semistructured interviews to identify patient adherence facilitators and barriers and implementation determinants for Emergency Medicine providers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is the first study to evaluate a novel, protocolized ED-initiated preventive cardiovascular care approach for HLD. If successful, the EMERALD intervention may be able to improve the cardiovascular health for at-risk patients and serve as a use case for other modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension, tobacco use, and obesity. This single-site study will inform a planned multisite trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":"24 3","pages":"e0390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12353110/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144972545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-04-30DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000391
Abdul Rasheed Bahar, Yasemin Bahar, Paawanjot Kaur, George Kidess, Mohamad Hasan Jawadi, Mohamed S Alrayyashi, Olayiwola Bolaji, Timir K Paul, M Chadi Alraies
Background: Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is defined as myocardial infarction with <50% stenosis of coronary arteries. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that may influence MINOCA outcomes.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2021), identifying MINOCA patients with and without AF using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression and propensity score matching were applied to control for confounders and assess outcomes.
Results: Of 94,840 MINOCA patients, 28,270 (30%) had AF. AF was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (3.74% vs. 2.75%; P = 0.004), acute heart failure (38.33% vs. 34.97%; P < 0.001), sudden cardiac arrest (2.54% vs. 1.73%; P < 0.050), and cardiogenic shock (3.11% vs. 1.56%; P < 0.001). AF independently predicted in-hospital mortality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-1.58; P < 0.001], heart failure (aOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.38-1.59; P < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.48-2.30; P < 0.001), and acute kidney injury (aOR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.24; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in percutaneous coronary intervention, mechanical circulatory support, or defibrillator use ( P > 0.050).
Conclusions: AF in MINOCA is associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, including mortality, sheart failure, acute kidney injury, and cardiogenic shock. AF may be a key prognostic marker in this population, warranting further research.
{"title":"Implications of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.","authors":"Abdul Rasheed Bahar, Yasemin Bahar, Paawanjot Kaur, George Kidess, Mohamad Hasan Jawadi, Mohamed S Alrayyashi, Olayiwola Bolaji, Timir K Paul, M Chadi Alraies","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000391","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000391","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is defined as myocardial infarction with <50% stenosis of coronary arteries. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that may influence MINOCA outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2021), identifying MINOCA patients with and without AF using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression and propensity score matching were applied to control for confounders and assess outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 94,840 MINOCA patients, 28,270 (30%) had AF. AF was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (3.74% vs. 2.75%; P = 0.004), acute heart failure (38.33% vs. 34.97%; P < 0.001), sudden cardiac arrest (2.54% vs. 1.73%; P < 0.050), and cardiogenic shock (3.11% vs. 1.56%; P < 0.001). AF independently predicted in-hospital mortality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-1.58; P < 0.001], heart failure (aOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.38-1.59; P < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.48-2.30; P < 0.001), and acute kidney injury (aOR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.24; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in percutaneous coronary intervention, mechanical circulatory support, or defibrillator use ( P > 0.050).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AF in MINOCA is associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, including mortality, sheart failure, acute kidney injury, and cardiogenic shock. AF may be a key prognostic marker in this population, warranting further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144050832","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-08-22DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000394
Ibtesam I El-Dosouky, Eman H Seddik, Shaimaa Wageeh
{"title":"The Use of Global Longitudinal Strain to Detect Subclinical Reduction in Left Ventricular Pump Function: Erratum.","authors":"Ibtesam I El-Dosouky, Eman H Seddik, Shaimaa Wageeh","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000394","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000394","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":"24 3","pages":"e0394"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144971611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-07-16DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000397
R Gentry Wilkerson, Nicklaus P Ashburn, Anna C Snavely, Brandon R Allen, Robert H Christenson, Michael Weaver, Xiaoxi Zhang, Troy E Madsen, Bryn E Mumma, Michael W Supples, Simon A Mahler
Background: Thirty-day performance of the high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT) European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour (ESC 0/1-h) and "one-and-done" (hs-cTnT
Methods: A preplanned secondary analysis of a prospective multisite US cohort was conducted. Adults with chest pain were enrolled from 8 emergency departments (January 2017-September 2018). hs-cTnT measures (0- and 1-h) were used to classify patients by the ESC 0/1-h algorithm into rule-out, observation, and rule-in zones. Patients with 0-h measures
Results: Among 1462 patients with a mean age of 57.6 ± 12.9 years, 46.4% (678/1462) were female, and 14.0% (205/1462) had cardiac death or MI at 90 days. One-and-done strategy efficacy was 32.8% (479/1462), and NPV was 99.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 97.6-99.7]. Adding the HEART score decreased efficacy to 20.1% (293/1462) and increased NPV to 99.7% (95% CI, 98.1-100). ESC 0/1-h efficacy was 57.8% (826/1430) and NPV was 98.3% (95% CI, 97.2-99.1). Combined with a HEART score, NPV increased to 99.3% (95% CI, 98.0-99.9), but efficacy decreased to 30.8% (95% CI, 28.3-33.2).
Conclusions: The one-and-done strategy and ESC 0/1-hour algorithm had modest rates of missed 90-day cardiac death or MI. Adding a HEART score improved safety but decreased efficacy.
{"title":"Performance of High-Sensitivity Troponin T Risk Stratification Strategies for 90-day Cardiac Death or Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"R Gentry Wilkerson, Nicklaus P Ashburn, Anna C Snavely, Brandon R Allen, Robert H Christenson, Michael Weaver, Xiaoxi Zhang, Troy E Madsen, Bryn E Mumma, Michael W Supples, Simon A Mahler","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000397","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000397","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thirty-day performance of the high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-cTnT) European Society of Cardiology 0/1-hour (ESC 0/1-h) and \"one-and-done\" (hs-cTnT<limit of quantification) strategies are established. However, 90-day performance is unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the 90-day performance of these hs-cTnT strategies in a US cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A preplanned secondary analysis of a prospective multisite US cohort was conducted. Adults with chest pain were enrolled from 8 emergency departments (January 2017-September 2018). hs-cTnT measures (0- and 1-h) were used to classify patients by the ESC 0/1-h algorithm into rule-out, observation, and rule-in zones. Patients with 0-h measures <limit of quantification were considered ruled out by the one-and-done strategy. The primary outcome was adjudicated 90-day cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI). Negative predictive value (NPV) for the primary endpoint and efficacy (proportion ruled out) were calculated for each strategy alone and in combination with the History, ECG, Age, Risk factor, and Troponin (HEART) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1462 patients with a mean age of 57.6 ± 12.9 years, 46.4% (678/1462) were female, and 14.0% (205/1462) had cardiac death or MI at 90 days. One-and-done strategy efficacy was 32.8% (479/1462), and NPV was 99.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 97.6-99.7]. Adding the HEART score decreased efficacy to 20.1% (293/1462) and increased NPV to 99.7% (95% CI, 98.1-100). ESC 0/1-h efficacy was 57.8% (826/1430) and NPV was 98.3% (95% CI, 97.2-99.1). Combined with a HEART score, NPV increased to 99.3% (95% CI, 98.0-99.9), but efficacy decreased to 30.8% (95% CI, 28.3-33.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The one-and-done strategy and ESC 0/1-hour algorithm had modest rates of missed 90-day cardiac death or MI. Adding a HEART score improved safety but decreased efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144650797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}