Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2023-12-04DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000344
Mohammad Reza Movahed, Arman Soltani Moghadam, Mehrnoosh Hashemzadeh, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh
Background: Aortic valve surgery has been performed increasingly in high-risk patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate this trend based on gender in the United States before the availability of percutaneous aortic valve replacement.
Method: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was utilized to calculate the age-adjusted utilization rate for aortic valve surgery from 1988 to 2011 in the United States using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding for aortic valve surgery.
Results: A total population of 258,506 patients who underwent aortic valve between 1988 and 2011 were available for our study over the age of 20. We found that the age-adjusted rate of aortic valve surgery gradually increased from 1988 until 2009 and stabilized thereafter with a persistently higher rate for men. For men, age-adjusted rate in 1988 was 13.3 per 100,000 versus 27.0 in year in the year 2011 per 100,000. For women, the age-adjusted rate in 1988 was 6.07 per 100,000 versus 11.4 in year 2011 per 100,000.
Conclusions: Aortic valve surgery utilization has stabilized in recent years in both genders in the United States. However, this rate has been persistently more than double in men. The cause of this higher utilization in males needs further investigation.
{"title":"Gender-based Disparity in Performing Aortic Valve Surgery in the United State Before Availability of Percutaneous Valve Implantation.","authors":"Mohammad Reza Movahed, Arman Soltani Moghadam, Mehrnoosh Hashemzadeh, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000344","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000344","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aortic valve surgery has been performed increasingly in high-risk patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate this trend based on gender in the United States before the availability of percutaneous aortic valve replacement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was utilized to calculate the age-adjusted utilization rate for aortic valve surgery from 1988 to 2011 in the United States using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision coding for aortic valve surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total population of 258,506 patients who underwent aortic valve between 1988 and 2011 were available for our study over the age of 20. We found that the age-adjusted rate of aortic valve surgery gradually increased from 1988 until 2009 and stabilized thereafter with a persistently higher rate for men. For men, age-adjusted rate in 1988 was 13.3 per 100,000 versus 27.0 in year in the year 2011 per 100,000. For women, the age-adjusted rate in 1988 was 6.07 per 100,000 versus 11.4 in year 2011 per 100,000.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aortic valve surgery utilization has stabilized in recent years in both genders in the United States. However, this rate has been persistently more than double in men. The cause of this higher utilization in males needs further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"103-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138478771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-05-22DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000360
Alberto Conti, Marco Leorin, Irene Carlotta Bogazzi, Noemi Renzi, Giuseppe Pepe, Fabiana Frosini, Lucilla Furesi, Luca Dalla Tomasina, Paolo Pennati, Lorenzo Ghiadoni
Objective: To verify the incidence of bleeding events in patients on ongoing anticoagulant treatment in the real world and compare the results of different reversal or repletion strategies currently available for pharmacological treatment.
Methods: Patients managed in the emergency department (ED) with major bleeding events, on ongoing anticoagulation were stratified according to bleeding site and reversal or repletion therapy with andexanet alfa (ADX), idarucizumab (IDA), prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), and vitamin K (Vit-K).
Endpoint: Death at 30 days was compared in the subgroups with cerebral hemorrhage (CH) and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.
Results: Of the 809,397 visits in the years 2022-2023 at 6 EDs in the northwestern health district of Tuscany, 5372 patients with bleeding events were considered; 3740 were excluded due to minor bleeding or propensity score matching. Of the remaining 1632 patients with major bleeding, 548 on ongoing anticoagulation were enrolled; 334 received reversal or repletion agents. Patients with CH (n = 176) and GI bleeding (n = 108) represented the primary analysis cohorts in the study's strategic treatment assessment. Overall, 30-day survival of patients on ongoing aFXa treatment receiving on-label ADX versus off-label PCC showed a relative increase of 71%, while 30-day survival of patients on ongoing aFII receiving on-label IDA versus off-label PCC showed a relative increase of 30%; no substantial difference was found when comparing on-label PCC combined with Vit-K versus off-label Vit-K alone. Indeed, patients undergoing on-label ADX or IDA showed a statistically significant difference over off-label PCC (ADX vs. PCC: n = 15, events = 4, mean ± SD 82.50 ± 18.9, vs. 49, 13, 98.82 ± 27, respectively; analysis of variance [ANOVA] variance 8627; P < 0.001; posthoc test diff 32, 95% confidence interval: 28-35; P < 001; IDA vs. PCC: 20, 5, 32.29 ± 15.0 vs. 2, 1, 28.00 ± 0.0, respectively; ANOVA 1484; P < 0.001; posthoc test -29, -29 -29, respectively; P = n.d.). On-label PCC combined with Vit-K showed overall a slight statistically significant difference versus off-label Vit-K alone (52, 16, 100.58 ± 22.6 vs. 53, 11, 154.62 ± 29.8, respectively; ANOVA 310; P < 0.02; posthoc test 4, 0.7-7.2, respectively; P < 0.02). Data were confirmed in the group of patients with CH (ADX vs. PCC: n = 13, events = 3, mean ± SD 91.55 ± 18.6 vs. 78, 21, 108.91 ± 20.9, respectively; ANOVA variance 10,091, F = 261; P < 0.001; posthoc difference test 36, 95% confidence interval: 30-41; P < 0.001; IDA vs. PCC: 10, 2, 4.50 ± 2.5 vs. 78, 21, 108.91 ± 20.9, respectively; ANOVA 16,876,303, respectively; P < 0.001; posthoc test 41, 34-47, respectively; P < 0.001). On-label PCC combined with Vit-K showed an overall slight statistically significant difference compared with off-label Vit-K alone (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001 in the subgroups of CH and GI bl
目的核实正在接受抗凝治疗的患者在现实世界中的出血事件发生率,并比较目前可用于药物治疗的不同逆转或补充策略的效果:方法:对急诊科(ED)正在接受抗凝治疗的大出血患者根据出血部位进行分层,并使用安赛蜜α(ADX)、依达珠单抗(IDA)、凝血酶原复合物浓缩物(PCC)和维生素K(Vit-K)进行逆转或补充治疗:终点:比较脑出血(CH)和胃肠道出血(GI)亚组在30天内的死亡情况:2022-2023年间,托斯卡纳西北部卫生区的6家急诊室共接诊809397人次,其中5372人有出血事件;3740人因轻微出血或倾向评分匹配而被排除。在剩余的 1632 名大出血患者中,有 548 人正在接受抗凝治疗;其中 334 人接受了逆转或补充治疗。CH(176 例)和消化道出血(108 例)患者是该研究战略治疗评估的主要分析组群。总体而言,正在接受 aFXa 治疗的患者接受标签内 ADX 与标签外 PCC 相比,30 天存活率相对提高了 71%;正在接受 aFII 治疗的患者接受标签内 IDA 与标签外 PCC 相比,30 天存活率相对提高了 30%;标签内 PCC 联合 Vit-K 与标签外单独 Vit-K 相比,没有发现实质性差异。事实上,接受标签内 ADX 或 IDA 治疗的患者与标签外 PCC 相比有显著的统计学差异(ADX vs. PCC:n = 15, events = 4, mean ± SD 82.50 ± 18.9, vs. 49, 13, 98.82 ± 27, respectively; analysis of variance [ANOVA] variance 8627; P < 0.001; posthoc test diff 32, 95% confidence interval: 28-35; P < 001; IDA vs. PCC:20, 5, 32.29 ± 15.0 vs. 2, 1, 28.00 ± 0.0, respectively; ANOVA 1484; P < 0.001; posthoc test -29, -29 -29, respectively; P = n.d.)。标签上的 PCC 联合 Vit-K 与标签外的单独 Vit-K 相比,总体上略有统计学差异(分别为 52,16,100.58 ± 22.6 vs. 53,11,154.62 ± 29.8;方差分析 310;P <0.02;事后检验分别为 4,0.7-7.2;P <0.02)。CH患者组的数据得到了证实(ADX vs. PCC:n = 13, events = 3, mean ± SD 91.55 ± 18.6 vs. 78, 21, 108.91 ± 20.9, respectively; ANOVA variance 10,091, F = 261; P < 0.001; posthoc difference test 36, 95% confidence interval:30-41; P < 0.001; IDA vs. PCC:分别为10、2、4.50 ± 2.5 vs. 78、21、108.91 ± 20.9;方差分析分别为16 876 303;P < 0.001;事后差异检验分别为41、34-47;P < 0.001)。与单独使用标签外的Vit-K相比,标签内的PCC联合Vit-K总体上略有统计学差异(在CH和消化道出血亚组中,P<0.01,P<0.001):结论:在标签内使用ADX或IDA进行特异性逆转治疗的患者,在分别使用aFXa或aFII抗凝剂治疗时,与标签外使用PCC进行补充治疗的患者相比,30天内死亡的差异具有统计学意义。总体而言,正在使用 aFXa 或 aFII 的患者接受标签内的 ADX 或 IDA 逆转治疗与标签外的 PCC 补充治疗相比,30 天生存率分别增加了 71% 和 30%。
{"title":"Reversal or Repletion Treatment Strategies and Outcomes of Patients With Major Bleeding Events Managed in the Emergency Department: Large Real-Life Investigation in the Northwestern Healthcare District of Tuscany.","authors":"Alberto Conti, Marco Leorin, Irene Carlotta Bogazzi, Noemi Renzi, Giuseppe Pepe, Fabiana Frosini, Lucilla Furesi, Luca Dalla Tomasina, Paolo Pennati, Lorenzo Ghiadoni","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000360","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000360","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To verify the incidence of bleeding events in patients on ongoing anticoagulant treatment in the real world and compare the results of different reversal or repletion strategies currently available for pharmacological treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients managed in the emergency department (ED) with major bleeding events, on ongoing anticoagulation were stratified according to bleeding site and reversal or repletion therapy with andexanet alfa (ADX), idarucizumab (IDA), prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), and vitamin K (Vit-K).</p><p><strong>Endpoint: </strong>Death at 30 days was compared in the subgroups with cerebral hemorrhage (CH) and gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 809,397 visits in the years 2022-2023 at 6 EDs in the northwestern health district of Tuscany, 5372 patients with bleeding events were considered; 3740 were excluded due to minor bleeding or propensity score matching. Of the remaining 1632 patients with major bleeding, 548 on ongoing anticoagulation were enrolled; 334 received reversal or repletion agents. Patients with CH (n = 176) and GI bleeding (n = 108) represented the primary analysis cohorts in the study's strategic treatment assessment. Overall, 30-day survival of patients on ongoing aFXa treatment receiving on-label ADX versus off-label PCC showed a relative increase of 71%, while 30-day survival of patients on ongoing aFII receiving on-label IDA versus off-label PCC showed a relative increase of 30%; no substantial difference was found when comparing on-label PCC combined with Vit-K versus off-label Vit-K alone. Indeed, patients undergoing on-label ADX or IDA showed a statistically significant difference over off-label PCC (ADX vs. PCC: n = 15, events = 4, mean ± SD 82.50 ± 18.9, vs. 49, 13, 98.82 ± 27, respectively; analysis of variance [ANOVA] variance 8627; P < 0.001; posthoc test diff 32, 95% confidence interval: 28-35; P < 001; IDA vs. PCC: 20, 5, 32.29 ± 15.0 vs. 2, 1, 28.00 ± 0.0, respectively; ANOVA 1484; P < 0.001; posthoc test -29, -29 -29, respectively; P = n.d.). On-label PCC combined with Vit-K showed overall a slight statistically significant difference versus off-label Vit-K alone (52, 16, 100.58 ± 22.6 vs. 53, 11, 154.62 ± 29.8, respectively; ANOVA 310; P < 0.02; posthoc test 4, 0.7-7.2, respectively; P < 0.02). Data were confirmed in the group of patients with CH (ADX vs. PCC: n = 13, events = 3, mean ± SD 91.55 ± 18.6 vs. 78, 21, 108.91 ± 20.9, respectively; ANOVA variance 10,091, F = 261; P < 0.001; posthoc difference test 36, 95% confidence interval: 30-41; P < 0.001; IDA vs. PCC: 10, 2, 4.50 ± 2.5 vs. 78, 21, 108.91 ± 20.9, respectively; ANOVA 16,876,303, respectively; P < 0.001; posthoc test 41, 34-47, respectively; P < 0.001). On-label PCC combined with Vit-K showed an overall slight statistically significant difference compared with off-label Vit-K alone (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001 in the subgroups of CH and GI bl","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":"23 2","pages":"58-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141089200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-05-22DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000359
Takuma Miyamoto, Christopher David Pritting, Rob Tatum, Danial Ahmad, Yevgeniy Brailovsky, Mahek K Shah, Indranee Rajapreyar, J Eduardo Rame, Rene J Alvarez, John W Entwistle, Howard Todd Massey, Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
Purpose: We sought to characterize adaptive changes to the revised United Network for Organ Sharing donor heart allocation policy and estimate long-term survival trends for heart transplant (HTx) recipients.
Methods: Patients listed for HTx between October 17, 2013 and September 30, 2021 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, and stratified into pre- and postpolicy revision groups. Subanalyses were performed to examine trends in device utilization for extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO), durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), microaxial support (Impella), and no mechanical circulatory support (non-MCS). Survival data post-HTx were fitted to parametric distributions and extrapolated to 5 years.
Results: We identified 27,523 HTx waitlist candidates during the study period, most of whom (n = 16,376) were waitlisted in the prepolicy change period. Overall, 19,554 patients underwent HTx during the study period (pre: 12,037 and post: 7517). Listings increased after the policy change for ECMO ( P < 0.01), Impella ( P < 0.01), and IABP ( P < 0.01) patients. Listings for LVAD ( P < 0.01) and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) patients decreased. HTx increased for ECMO ( P < 0.01), Impella ( P < 0.01), and IABP ( P < 0.01) patients after the policy change and decreased for LVAD ( P < 0.01) and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) patients. Waitlist survival increased for the overall ( P < 0.01), ECMO ( P < 0.01), IABP ( P < 0.01), and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) groups. Waitlist survival did not differ for the LVAD ( P = 0.8) and Impella ( P = 0.1) groups. Post-transplant survival decreased for the overall ( P < 0.01), LVAD ( P < 0.01), and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) populations.
Conclusions: Allocation policy revisions have contributed to greater utilization of ECMO, Impella, and IABP, decreased utilization of LVADs and non-MCS, increased waitlist survival, and decreased post-HTx survival.
{"title":"Characterizing Adaptive Changes and Patient Survival After 2018 Donor Allocation Restructuring: A UNOS Database Analysis.","authors":"Takuma Miyamoto, Christopher David Pritting, Rob Tatum, Danial Ahmad, Yevgeniy Brailovsky, Mahek K Shah, Indranee Rajapreyar, J Eduardo Rame, Rene J Alvarez, John W Entwistle, Howard Todd Massey, Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000359","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000359","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We sought to characterize adaptive changes to the revised United Network for Organ Sharing donor heart allocation policy and estimate long-term survival trends for heart transplant (HTx) recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients listed for HTx between October 17, 2013 and September 30, 2021 were identified from the United Network for Organ Sharing database, and stratified into pre- and postpolicy revision groups. Subanalyses were performed to examine trends in device utilization for extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO), durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), microaxial support (Impella), and no mechanical circulatory support (non-MCS). Survival data post-HTx were fitted to parametric distributions and extrapolated to 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 27,523 HTx waitlist candidates during the study period, most of whom (n = 16,376) were waitlisted in the prepolicy change period. Overall, 19,554 patients underwent HTx during the study period (pre: 12,037 and post: 7517). Listings increased after the policy change for ECMO ( P < 0.01), Impella ( P < 0.01), and IABP ( P < 0.01) patients. Listings for LVAD ( P < 0.01) and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) patients decreased. HTx increased for ECMO ( P < 0.01), Impella ( P < 0.01), and IABP ( P < 0.01) patients after the policy change and decreased for LVAD ( P < 0.01) and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) patients. Waitlist survival increased for the overall ( P < 0.01), ECMO ( P < 0.01), IABP ( P < 0.01), and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) groups. Waitlist survival did not differ for the LVAD ( P = 0.8) and Impella ( P = 0.1) groups. Post-transplant survival decreased for the overall ( P < 0.01), LVAD ( P < 0.01), and non-MCS ( P < 0.01) populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Allocation policy revisions have contributed to greater utilization of ECMO, Impella, and IABP, decreased utilization of LVADs and non-MCS, increased waitlist survival, and decreased post-HTx survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"81-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141071594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-05-22DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000349
Christian Osmar Chávez, Osmar Antonio Centurión, Alfredo Javier Meza, Rocío Del Pilar Falcón, Karina E Scavenius, Laura B García, Orlando R Sequeira, Judith M Torales, Erdulfo J Galeano
Background: Left atrial peak systolic strain (LA-PSS) imaging is an emerging index of left atrial function, and it was shown to be decreased in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (EF). We aimed to determine whether LA-PSS could be used as an additional diagnostic parameter to current existing guidelines for the presence of left ventricle diastolic dysfunction (LVDD).
Materials and methods: A total of 190 consecutive adult patients with cardiovascular risk factors and normal left ventricle EF with no prior history of heart failure were included in the study. Speckle tracking software was used to study ventricular parietal deformity, left ventricle global longitudinal systolic strain, and LA-PSS.
Results: The median left ventricle global longitudinal systolic strain was -19%, with a significant difference ( P < 0.001) between patients with normal diastolic function versus those with LVDD. The median LA-PSS was 33% (30% to 38%) ( P < 0.001). Most patients (61%) had grade 1 atrial dysfunction based on PSS (range 24%-35%). The analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the LA-PSS as a potential indicator pathway of LVDD was 67% [95% confidence interval (CI), 62-72], and 75% (95% CI, 70-80), when the indeterminate pattern was included. The decreased LA-PSS made it possible to reclassify patients with an indeterminate pattern of diastolic function in 96% of cases.
Conclusions: These results support the potential role of LA-PSS as an additional parameter for the diagnosis of LVDD in patients with normal EF, and may be integrated into the guidelines for routine evaluation of patients.
{"title":"Left Atrial Peak Systolic Strain as an Indicator Pathway of Diastolic Dysfunction of the Left Ventricle.","authors":"Christian Osmar Chávez, Osmar Antonio Centurión, Alfredo Javier Meza, Rocío Del Pilar Falcón, Karina E Scavenius, Laura B García, Orlando R Sequeira, Judith M Torales, Erdulfo J Galeano","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000349","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000349","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left atrial peak systolic strain (LA-PSS) imaging is an emerging index of left atrial function, and it was shown to be decreased in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (EF). We aimed to determine whether LA-PSS could be used as an additional diagnostic parameter to current existing guidelines for the presence of left ventricle diastolic dysfunction (LVDD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 190 consecutive adult patients with cardiovascular risk factors and normal left ventricle EF with no prior history of heart failure were included in the study. Speckle tracking software was used to study ventricular parietal deformity, left ventricle global longitudinal systolic strain, and LA-PSS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median left ventricle global longitudinal systolic strain was -19%, with a significant difference ( P < 0.001) between patients with normal diastolic function versus those with LVDD. The median LA-PSS was 33% (30% to 38%) ( P < 0.001). Most patients (61%) had grade 1 atrial dysfunction based on PSS (range 24%-35%). The analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the LA-PSS as a potential indicator pathway of LVDD was 67% [95% confidence interval (CI), 62-72], and 75% (95% CI, 70-80), when the indeterminate pattern was included. The decreased LA-PSS made it possible to reclassify patients with an indeterminate pattern of diastolic function in 96% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results support the potential role of LA-PSS as an additional parameter for the diagnosis of LVDD in patients with normal EF, and may be integrated into the guidelines for routine evaluation of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"111-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139933349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-09DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000362
Muhammad Ali Tariq, Minhail Khalid Malik, Zoha Khalid, Aeman Asrar
INTRODUCTION Acute heart failure (AHF) is a leading cause of unplanned hospitalization often associated with poor outcomes. Decongestion with intravenous loop diuretics is the mainstay of treatment. Metrics such as door-to-diuretic time, the time between presentation of AHF to the hospital and administration of intravenous diuretics, may play an important role in faster decongestion and thereby reduce mortality. We sought to investigate whether early diuretic administration (door-to-diuretic [D2D] time 60≤mins) was associated with improved outcomes among hospitalized HF patients. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus databases was performed from inception until June, 2023. The primary endpoints were all cause in hospital and 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay and heart failure readmission. We used a random-effects model to calculate odds ratios (OR) for binary outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous data. RESULTS Our meta-analysis included 6 observational studies involving 19,916 patients. No significant differences (p>0.05) were observed between shorter D2D and delayed D2D time with respect to in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.35-1.09), 30-day mortality (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.51-1.33; P=0.44), length of hospital stay (MD: -0.02; 95% CI: -0.26 to 0.22) and HF readmission (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.86-1.20). CONCLUSION Evidence from existing literature, which is largely limited to observational comparisons, highlights comparable outcomes between the two treatment strategies. Early diuretic administration, particularly within 60 minutes of hospital presentation, does not demonstrate any prognostic benefits.
{"title":"Door-to-Diuretic Time and Short-Term Outcomes in Acute Heart Failure. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Muhammad Ali Tariq, Minhail Khalid Malik, Zoha Khalid, Aeman Asrar","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000362","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\u0000Acute heart failure (AHF) is a leading cause of unplanned hospitalization often associated with poor outcomes. Decongestion with intravenous loop diuretics is the mainstay of treatment. Metrics such as door-to-diuretic time, the time between presentation of AHF to the hospital and administration of intravenous diuretics, may play an important role in faster decongestion and thereby reduce mortality. We sought to investigate whether early diuretic administration (door-to-diuretic [D2D] time 60≤mins) was associated with improved outcomes among hospitalized HF patients.\u0000\u0000\u0000METHODS\u0000A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus databases was performed from inception until June, 2023. The primary endpoints were all cause in hospital and 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay and heart failure readmission. We used a random-effects model to calculate odds ratios (OR) for binary outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous data.\u0000\u0000\u0000RESULTS\u0000Our meta-analysis included 6 observational studies involving 19,916 patients. No significant differences (p>0.05) were observed between shorter D2D and delayed D2D time with respect to in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.35-1.09), 30-day mortality (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.51-1.33; P=0.44), length of hospital stay (MD: -0.02; 95% CI: -0.26 to 0.22) and HF readmission (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.86-1.20).\u0000\u0000\u0000CONCLUSION\u0000Evidence from existing literature, which is largely limited to observational comparisons, highlights comparable outcomes between the two treatment strategies. Early diuretic administration, particularly within 60 minutes of hospital presentation, does not demonstrate any prognostic benefits.","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":"243 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140723957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-04-08DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000361
C. Krittanawong, Yichen Wang, Y. Qadeer, Bing Chen, Zhen Wang, Fuad M. Al-Azzam, Mahboob Alam, Samin K. Sharma, Hani Jneid
It is well known that individuals with liver cirrhosis are considered high risk for cardiac surgery, with an increased risk for morbidity and mortality as the liver disease progresses. In the last decade, there have been considerable advances in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in individuals deemed to high risk for surgery. However, research surrounding TAVI in the setting of liver cirrhosis has not been as widely studied. In this national population-based cohort study, we evaluated the trends of mortality, complications, and healthcare utilization in liver cirrhotic patients undergoing TAVI, as well as analyze the basic demographics of these individuals. We found that from 2011-2020, the amount of TAVI procedures conducted in cirrhotic patients was increasing annually while the mortality, procedural complications, and healthcare utilization trends in these cirrhotic patients undergoing TAVI decreased. Overall, TAVI does seem to be a reasonable management for aortic stenosis patients with liver cirrhosis who need aortic valve replacement.
{"title":"Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Utilization, Outcomes, and Healthcare Resource Use in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Decade of Insights (2011-2020).","authors":"C. Krittanawong, Yichen Wang, Y. Qadeer, Bing Chen, Zhen Wang, Fuad M. Al-Azzam, Mahboob Alam, Samin K. Sharma, Hani Jneid","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000361","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000361","url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that individuals with liver cirrhosis are considered high risk for cardiac surgery, with an increased risk for morbidity and mortality as the liver disease progresses. In the last decade, there have been considerable advances in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) as an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in individuals deemed to high risk for surgery. However, research surrounding TAVI in the setting of liver cirrhosis has not been as widely studied. In this national population-based cohort study, we evaluated the trends of mortality, complications, and healthcare utilization in liver cirrhotic patients undergoing TAVI, as well as analyze the basic demographics of these individuals. We found that from 2011-2020, the amount of TAVI procedures conducted in cirrhotic patients was increasing annually while the mortality, procedural complications, and healthcare utilization trends in these cirrhotic patients undergoing TAVI decreased. Overall, TAVI does seem to be a reasonable management for aortic stenosis patients with liver cirrhosis who need aortic valve replacement.","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":"169 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140730826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2023-11-09DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000343
Khawaja M Talha, John G Winscott, Vishal Patel, Alejandro Lemor, Kellan E Ashley, William F Campbell, Michael R McMullan, Gabriel A Hernandez
The use of Impella assist device for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiogenic shock has increased in the last decade and requires a large bore arterial access (LBA). However, LBA closure following Impella removal is associated with significant complications. Herein, we describe the safety and efficacy of a novel method of LBA closure using arterial recoil following Impella removal. We performed a retrospective review of electronic medical records of patients who underwent LBA closure using this method from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2022. The procedure involves controlled downsizing of the arterial sheath from 12 French (Fr) to 6 Fr catheters with intermittent compression to allow patent hemostasis facilitated by arterial recoil. Baseline characteristics and outcomes including closure success, immediate/delayed bleeding, and access site complications were included. Of 103 patients with Impella placement, 20 (19%) underwent LBA closure with this method. Patients were predominantly male (80%) and White (55%) with a mean age of 65 ± 16 years. After downsizing of the femoral sheath to 6 Fr, 14 patients underwent manual compression, 3 patients had a 6 Fr catheter left in place to maintain access, and 3 patients underwent placement of a Perclose or Vascade device. Successful LBA closure was performed in all patients with no immediate or delayed bleeding complications. Five patients (25%) died inpatient; the deaths were unrelated to complications of Impella removal. In conclusion, LBA closure post-Impella removal with this novel method was safe and effective. Further prospective studies are needed to ascertain its comparative efficacy.
{"title":"Using Arterial Recoil for Large Bore Access Closure After Impella Assist Device Removal.","authors":"Khawaja M Talha, John G Winscott, Vishal Patel, Alejandro Lemor, Kellan E Ashley, William F Campbell, Michael R McMullan, Gabriel A Hernandez","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000343","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000343","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of Impella assist device for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions and cardiogenic shock has increased in the last decade and requires a large bore arterial access (LBA). However, LBA closure following Impella removal is associated with significant complications. Herein, we describe the safety and efficacy of a novel method of LBA closure using arterial recoil following Impella removal. We performed a retrospective review of electronic medical records of patients who underwent LBA closure using this method from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2022. The procedure involves controlled downsizing of the arterial sheath from 12 French (Fr) to 6 Fr catheters with intermittent compression to allow patent hemostasis facilitated by arterial recoil. Baseline characteristics and outcomes including closure success, immediate/delayed bleeding, and access site complications were included. Of 103 patients with Impella placement, 20 (19%) underwent LBA closure with this method. Patients were predominantly male (80%) and White (55%) with a mean age of 65 ± 16 years. After downsizing of the femoral sheath to 6 Fr, 14 patients underwent manual compression, 3 patients had a 6 Fr catheter left in place to maintain access, and 3 patients underwent placement of a Perclose or Vascade device. Successful LBA closure was performed in all patients with no immediate or delayed bleeding complications. Five patients (25%) died inpatient; the deaths were unrelated to complications of Impella removal. In conclusion, LBA closure post-Impella removal with this novel method was safe and effective. Further prospective studies are needed to ascertain its comparative efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"36-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72015582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2023-11-09DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000342
Amin Daoulah, Wael Qenawi, Ali Alshehri, Maryam Jameel Naser, Youssef Elmahrouk, Mohammed Alshehri, Ahmed Elmahrouk, Mohammed A Qutub, Badr Alzahrani, Nooraldaem Yousif, Amr A Arafat, Wael Almahmeed, Abdelmaksoud Elganady, Ziad Dahdouh, Ahmad S Hersi, Ahmed Jamjoom, Mohamed N Alama, Ehab Selim, Shahrukh Hashmani, Taher Hassan, Abdulrahman M Alqahtani, Abdulwali Abohasan, Mohamed Ajaz Ghani, Faisal Omar M Al Nasser, Wael Refaat, Mina Iskandar, Omar Haider, Adnan Fathey Hussien, Ahmed A Ghonim, Abeer M Shawky, Seraj Abualnaja, Hameedullah M Kazim, Ibrahim A M Abdulhabeeb, Khalid Z Alshali, Jairam Aithal, Issam Altnji, Haitham Amin, Ahmed M Ibrahim, Turki Al Garni, Abdulaziz A Elkhereiji, Husam A Noor, Osama Ahmad, Faisal J Alzahrani, Abdulaziz Alasmari, Abdulaziz Alkaluf, Ehab Elghaysha, Salem Owaid Al Wabisi, Adel N Algublan, Naveen Nasim, Sameer Alhamid, Basim Sait, Abdulrahman H Alqahtani, Mohammed Balghith, Omar Kanbr, Mohammed Abozenah, Amir Lotfi
Background: The use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary revascularization for left-main disease is still debated. The study aimed to characterize patients who received dual versus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for unprotected left-main disease and compare the outcomes of those patients.
Results: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 551 patients who were grouped into 2 groups: patients who received SAPT (n = 150) and those who received DAPT (n = 401). There were no differences in age ( P = 0.451), gender ( P = 0.063), smoking ( P = 0.941), diabetes mellitus ( P = 0.773), history of myocardial infarction ( P = 0.709), chronic kidney disease ( P = 0.615), atrial fibrillation ( P = 0.306), or cerebrovascular accident ( P = 0.550) between patients who received SAPT versus DAPT. DAPTs were more commonly used in patients with acute coronary syndrome [87 (58%) vs. 273 (68.08%); P = 0.027], after off-pump CABG [12 (8%) vs. 73 (18.2%); P = 0.003] and in patients with radial artery grafts [1 (0.67%) vs. 32 (7.98%); P < 0.001]. While SAPTs were more commonly used in patients with low ejection fraction [55 (36.67%) vs. 61 (15.21%); P < 0.001] and in patients with postoperative acute kidney injury [27 (18%) vs. 37 (9.23%); P = 0.004]. The attributed treatment effect of DAPT for follow-up major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events was not significantly different from that of SAPT [β, -2.08 (95% confidence interval (CI), -20.8-16.7); P = 0.828]. The attributed treatment effect of DAPT on follow-up all-cause mortality was not significantly different from that of SAPT [β, 4.12 (CI, -11.1-19.32); P = 0.595]. There was no difference in bleeding between groups ( P = 0.666).
Conclusions: DAPTs were more commonly used in patients with acute coronary syndrome, after off-pump CABG, and with radial artery grafts. SAPTs were more commonly used in patients with low ejection fraction and acute kidney injury. Patients on DAPT after CABG for left-main disease had comparable major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events and survival to patients on SAPT, with no difference in bleeding events.
{"title":"Single Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left-Main Coronary Disease.","authors":"Amin Daoulah, Wael Qenawi, Ali Alshehri, Maryam Jameel Naser, Youssef Elmahrouk, Mohammed Alshehri, Ahmed Elmahrouk, Mohammed A Qutub, Badr Alzahrani, Nooraldaem Yousif, Amr A Arafat, Wael Almahmeed, Abdelmaksoud Elganady, Ziad Dahdouh, Ahmad S Hersi, Ahmed Jamjoom, Mohamed N Alama, Ehab Selim, Shahrukh Hashmani, Taher Hassan, Abdulrahman M Alqahtani, Abdulwali Abohasan, Mohamed Ajaz Ghani, Faisal Omar M Al Nasser, Wael Refaat, Mina Iskandar, Omar Haider, Adnan Fathey Hussien, Ahmed A Ghonim, Abeer M Shawky, Seraj Abualnaja, Hameedullah M Kazim, Ibrahim A M Abdulhabeeb, Khalid Z Alshali, Jairam Aithal, Issam Altnji, Haitham Amin, Ahmed M Ibrahim, Turki Al Garni, Abdulaziz A Elkhereiji, Husam A Noor, Osama Ahmad, Faisal J Alzahrani, Abdulaziz Alasmari, Abdulaziz Alkaluf, Ehab Elghaysha, Salem Owaid Al Wabisi, Adel N Algublan, Naveen Nasim, Sameer Alhamid, Basim Sait, Abdulrahman H Alqahtani, Mohammed Balghith, Omar Kanbr, Mohammed Abozenah, Amir Lotfi","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000342","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000342","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary revascularization for left-main disease is still debated. The study aimed to characterize patients who received dual versus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for unprotected left-main disease and compare the outcomes of those patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 551 patients who were grouped into 2 groups: patients who received SAPT (n = 150) and those who received DAPT (n = 401). There were no differences in age ( P = 0.451), gender ( P = 0.063), smoking ( P = 0.941), diabetes mellitus ( P = 0.773), history of myocardial infarction ( P = 0.709), chronic kidney disease ( P = 0.615), atrial fibrillation ( P = 0.306), or cerebrovascular accident ( P = 0.550) between patients who received SAPT versus DAPT. DAPTs were more commonly used in patients with acute coronary syndrome [87 (58%) vs. 273 (68.08%); P = 0.027], after off-pump CABG [12 (8%) vs. 73 (18.2%); P = 0.003] and in patients with radial artery grafts [1 (0.67%) vs. 32 (7.98%); P < 0.001]. While SAPTs were more commonly used in patients with low ejection fraction [55 (36.67%) vs. 61 (15.21%); P < 0.001] and in patients with postoperative acute kidney injury [27 (18%) vs. 37 (9.23%); P = 0.004]. The attributed treatment effect of DAPT for follow-up major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events was not significantly different from that of SAPT [β, -2.08 (95% confidence interval (CI), -20.8-16.7); P = 0.828]. The attributed treatment effect of DAPT on follow-up all-cause mortality was not significantly different from that of SAPT [β, 4.12 (CI, -11.1-19.32); P = 0.595]. There was no difference in bleeding between groups ( P = 0.666).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DAPTs were more commonly used in patients with acute coronary syndrome, after off-pump CABG, and with radial artery grafts. SAPTs were more commonly used in patients with low ejection fraction and acute kidney injury. Patients on DAPT after CABG for left-main disease had comparable major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events and survival to patients on SAPT, with no difference in bleeding events.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"12-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72015580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-03-01Epub Date: 2023-11-06DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000340
Mohammad Jawwad, Monazza Riaz, Mehreen Mehtab, Muhammad Yafaa Naveed Chaudhary, Jaya Kumari, Waqas Ahmad, Hina Aslam, Fatima Masood, Wajeeh Ur Rehman, Ihtisham Rahman, Israel Lara-Vega, Sunny Ratani, Aqeel Muhammad, Alnehyan Affa Baig, Abdul Rauf
Background: Several studies have been conducted over the years to find an effective and safe therapeutic agent to treat hypercholesterolemia. Inclisiran is a novel drug being studied for its efficacy and safety in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in patients to reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases. No previous study was done to review the trials for the serious adverse events of this drug. The primary objective of this research is to investigate the incidence of serious adverse events of this drug.
Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials is performed.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from their inception till July 3, 2023, was performed for ORION trials, studying the efficacy and safety of inclisiran. The random-effects model was used in the meta-analysis to provide a pooled proportion of serious adverse events. The risk of bias in each study was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Results: From 319 studies searched from the databases, only 8 relevant articles remained after a detailed evaluation. These studies, having a total of 4981 patients, were involved in the analysis, with a pooled estimate showing a nonsignificant incidence of serious adverse events. Each adverse event was studied individually, and product issues and endocrine disorders had the highest odds ratio among them. All included studies were classified as moderate quality.
Conclusion: Following systematic review and meta-analysis, we found no significant differences in any serious adverse events following the administration of inclisiran. However, larger ongoing trials will provide additional data to evaluate the safety profile of this agent.
{"title":"Serious Adverse Events of Inclisiran in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia, a Meta-Analysis of ORION Trials.","authors":"Mohammad Jawwad, Monazza Riaz, Mehreen Mehtab, Muhammad Yafaa Naveed Chaudhary, Jaya Kumari, Waqas Ahmad, Hina Aslam, Fatima Masood, Wajeeh Ur Rehman, Ihtisham Rahman, Israel Lara-Vega, Sunny Ratani, Aqeel Muhammad, Alnehyan Affa Baig, Abdul Rauf","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000340","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000340","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies have been conducted over the years to find an effective and safe therapeutic agent to treat hypercholesterolemia. Inclisiran is a novel drug being studied for its efficacy and safety in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in patients to reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases. No previous study was done to review the trials for the serious adverse events of this drug. The primary objective of this research is to investigate the incidence of serious adverse events of this drug.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials is performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from their inception till July 3, 2023, was performed for ORION trials, studying the efficacy and safety of inclisiran. The random-effects model was used in the meta-analysis to provide a pooled proportion of serious adverse events. The risk of bias in each study was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 319 studies searched from the databases, only 8 relevant articles remained after a detailed evaluation. These studies, having a total of 4981 patients, were involved in the analysis, with a pooled estimate showing a nonsignificant incidence of serious adverse events. Each adverse event was studied individually, and product issues and endocrine disorders had the highest odds ratio among them. All included studies were classified as moderate quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following systematic review and meta-analysis, we found no significant differences in any serious adverse events following the administration of inclisiran. However, larger ongoing trials will provide additional data to evaluate the safety profile of this agent.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71486884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is characterized by a low platelet count. This may lead to an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke but a lower rate of nonhemorrhagic stroke. The goal of this study was to evaluate the association between ITP and both hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic strokes using a large database.
Methods: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to analyze the occurrence of hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic stroke in patients with and without a diagnosis of ITP from 2005 to 2014.
Results: Univariate analysis revealed a higher incidence of hemorrhagic stroke in patients with ITP in the year studied. (for example, in 2005: OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.57-1.94; P < 0.001; 2014: OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 2.03-2.36; P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, race, and hypertension, hemorrhagic stroke remained significantly associated with ITP (in 2005: OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.49-1.89; P < 0.001; 2014: OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.86-2.18; P < 0.001) for all the years studied. Nonhemorrhagic stroke occurred at a lower rate in patients with ITP in most years (2006: OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.97; P = 0.004; 2014: OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed a higher rate of nonhemorrhagic stroke in ITP patients.
Conclusion: Our analysis showed that there was a higher rate of hemorrhagic stroke but a lower rate of ischemic stroke in ITP patients, suggesting an important role of platelets in the occurrence of stroke.
{"title":"Association Between Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Hemorrhagic and Nonhemorrhagic Stroke.","authors":"Rachna Guntu, Aamir Patel, Mohammad Reza Movahed, Mehrtash Hashemzadeh, Mehrnoosh Hashemzadeh","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000332","DOIUrl":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is characterized by a low platelet count. This may lead to an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke but a lower rate of nonhemorrhagic stroke. The goal of this study was to evaluate the association between ITP and both hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic strokes using a large database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database to analyze the occurrence of hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic stroke in patients with and without a diagnosis of ITP from 2005 to 2014.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariate analysis revealed a higher incidence of hemorrhagic stroke in patients with ITP in the year studied. (for example, in 2005: OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.57-1.94; P < 0.001; 2014: OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 2.03-2.36; P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, gender, race, and hypertension, hemorrhagic stroke remained significantly associated with ITP (in 2005: OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.49-1.89; P < 0.001; 2014: OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.86-2.18; P < 0.001) for all the years studied. Nonhemorrhagic stroke occurred at a lower rate in patients with ITP in most years (2006: OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.97; P = 0.004; 2014: OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed a higher rate of nonhemorrhagic stroke in ITP patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our analysis showed that there was a higher rate of hemorrhagic stroke but a lower rate of ischemic stroke in ITP patients, suggesting an important role of platelets in the occurrence of stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"26-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10128353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}