Structural Heart最新文献

Background

The effectiveness of cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPD) in mitigating stroke after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains uncertain, and therefore CEPD may be utilized differently across US hospitals. This study aims to characterize the hospital-level pattern of CEPD use during TAVI in the US and its association with outcomes.

Methods

Patients treated with nontransapical TAVI in the 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database were included. Hospitals were categorized as CEPD non-users and CEPD users. The following outcomes were compared: the composite of in-hospital stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), in-hospital ischemic stroke, death, and cost of hospitalization. Logistic regression models were used for risk adjustment of clinical outcomes.

Results

Of 41,822 TAVI encounters, CEPD was used in 10.6% (n = 4422). Out of 392 hospitals, 65.8% were CEPD non-user hospitals and 34.2% were CEPD users. No difference was observed between CEPD non-users and CEPD users in the risk of in-hospital stroke or TIA (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.99 [0.86-1.15]), ischemic stroke (adjusted OR = 1.00 [0.85-1.18]), or in-hospital death (adjusted OR = 0.86 [0.71-1.03]). The cost of hospitalization was lower in CEPD non-users.

Conclusions

Two-thirds of hospitals in the US do not use CEPD for TAVI, and no significant difference was observed in neurologic outcomes among patients treated at CEPD non-user and CEPD user hospitals.

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a common cause of heart failure and is the primary indication for heart transplantation. A genetic etiology can be found in 20-35% of patients with DCM, especially in those with a family history of cardiomyopathy or sudden cardiac death at an early age. With advancements in genome sequencing, the understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships in DCM has expanded with over 60 genes implicated in the disease. Subsequently, these findings have increased adoption of genetic testing in the management of DCM, which has allowed for improved risk stratification and identification of at risk family members. In this review, we discuss the genetic evaluation of DCM with a focus on practical genetic testing considerations, genotype-phenotype associations, and insights into upcoming personalized therapies.

Aims

This study aimed to investigate the symptoms and prognosis of patients with both moderate aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral stenosis (MS).

Methods and Results

We studied 82 patients with moderate AS and MS diagnosed via transthoracic echocardiography. The patients had a mean age of 79 ± 13 years and 95% of patients had degenerative MS. Out of 82 patients, 34 (41%) had heart failure (HF) symptoms (New York Heart Association class ≥ Ⅱ) or a history of HF admission. Left ventricular ejection fraction, stroke volume index, atrial fibrillation, and right ventricular systolic pressure were independent determinants of HF symptoms. The median follow-up duration was 3.2 (interquartile range, 1.0-4.9) years and clinical events occurred in 48 (59%) patients, including death in 11 (13%) patients, aortic or mitral valve interventions in 22 (27%) patients, and HF hospitalization in 15 (18%) patients. The 5-year survival free of the combined endpoint of aortic or mitral valve interventions, HF hospitalization, or death was 19%. A multivariate predictor of clinical events was HF symptoms (hazard ratio [HR], 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-4.14; p = 0.0045). Kaplan-Meier survival at 5 years was 61% without intervention and HF symptoms were not associated with mortality.

Conclusions

Among patients with both moderate AS and MS, left ventricular ejection fraction, stroke volume index, atrial fibrillation, and right ventricular systolic pressure were strong determinants of HF symptoms. HF symptoms were independently predictive of clinical events.

Background

Despite the demonstrated benefits of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), subclinical leaflet thrombosis and hypoattenuated leaflet thickening are commonly seen as initial indications of decreased valve durability and augmented risk of transient ischemic attack.

Methods

We developed a multiscale patient-specific computational framework to quantify metrics of global circulatory function, metrics of global cardiac function, and local cardiac fluid dynamics of the aortic root and coronary arteries.

Results

Based on our findings, TAVR might be associated with a high risk of blood stagnation in the neo-sinus region due to the lack of sufficient blood flow washout during the diastole phase (e.g., maximum blood stasis volume increased by 13, 8, and 2.7 fold in the left coronary cusp, right coronary cusp, and noncoronary cusp, respectively [N = 26]). Moreover, in some patients, TAVR might not be associated with left ventricle load relief (e.g., left ventricle load reduced only by 1.2 % [N = 26]) and diastolic coronary flow improvement (e.g., maximum coronary flow reduced by 4.94%, 15.05%, and 23.59% in the left anterior descending, left circumflex coronary artery, and right coronary artery, respectively, [N = 26]).

Conclusions

The transvalvular pressure gradient amelioration after TAVR might not translate into adequate sinus blood washout, optimal coronary flow, and reduced cardiac stress. Noninvasive personalized computational modeling can facilitate the determination of the most effective revascularization strategy pre-TAVR and monitor leaflet thrombosis and coronary plaque progression post-TAVR.

Over the last decades, we have witnessed considerable improvements in diagnostics and risk stratification of patients with significant aortic stenosis (AS), paralleled by advances in operative and anesthetic techniques. In addition, accumulating evidence points to the potential benefit of early valve replacement in such patients prior to the onset of symptoms. In parallel, interventional randomized trials have proven the benefit of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in comparison to a surgical approach to valve replacement over a broad risk spectrum in symptomatic patients with AS. This article reviews contemporary management approaches and scrutinizes open questions regarding timing and mode of intervention in asymptomatic patients with severe AS. We also discuss the challenges surrounding the management of symptomatic patients with moderate AS as well as emerging dilemmas related to the concept of a life-long treatment strategy for patients with AS.