Structural Heart最新文献

Background

Cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) is overactivated in heart failure patients and associated with clinical outcomes. The aim of this study is to investigate the early effect of MitraClip repair on cardiac SNA.

Methods

We evaluated the change of cardiac SNA by ¹²³I- meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy in patients who underwent MitraClip repair from March 2019 to June 2020 in our hospital. Patients without acute procedural success were excluded, including patients who died or underwent mitral valve surgery before discharge. MIBG scintigraphy was performed at baseline and 1 ​month after MitraClip repair.

Results

We analyzed 48 patients (mean age 78.6 ± 10 years; 52.1% male; 37 secondary mitral regurgitation [SMR]/11 primary mitral regurgitation [PMR]). MR severity and New York Heart Association functional class significantly improved from baseline to 1 ​month after MitraClip repair (both p < 0.001). Overall, delay heart-mediastinum ratio (H/M) had no significant change, and washout rate (WR) showed a decreasing trend (delay H/M; pre 2.07 ± 0.46, post 2.05 ± 0.49, paired p = 0.348, WR; pre 36.1 ± 11.6%, post 33.6 ± 11.7%, paired p = 0.061). In PMR patients, WR was significantly decreased, however, delay H/M was not (delay H/M; pre 2.15 ± 0.50, post 2.10 ± 0.57, paired p = 0.019, WR; pre 34.6 ± 10.5%, post 26.7 ± 13.8%, paired p = 0.568). In contrast, in SMR patients, neither delay H/M nor WR were significantly changed (delay H/M; pre 2.05 ± 0.45, post 2.03 ± 0.47, paired p = 0.474, WR; pre 36.6 ± 11.9%, post 35.7 ± 10.4%, paired p = 0.523).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that MitraClip repair could significantly decrease cardiac SNA of WR in PMR patients during 1-month follow-up, however, in SMR patients, the significant change of MIBG parameters was not observed.

Structural heart disease is a rapidly evolving field. However, training in structural heart disease is still widely variable and has not been standardized. Furthermore, integration of trainees within the heart team has not been fully defined. In this review, we discuss the components and function of the heart team, the challenges of current structural heart disease models, and possible solutions and suggestions for integrating trainees within the heart team.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has emerged as the preferred treatment modality in most patients with severe aortic stenosis. With its global adoption and broader application in younger and healthier patients, the issue of transcatheter bioprosthetic valve degeneration and its impact on valve durability continues to earn clinical relevance. Differences in the pathophysiologic processes that separate native from transcatheter heart valve deterioration remain poorly understood. When compared to surgical aortic bioprostheses, the mechanisms of valve degeneration are similar in transcatheter heart valves, with meaningful differences most noticeably found between the individual constructs of their design. Recognizing the clinical and hemodynamic presentation of structural valve degeneration remains paramount. The recently revised consensus guidelines that incorporate the integration of advanced multimodality imaging with invasive hemodynamics represent a major step forward in our ability to accurately diagnose bioprosthetic valve degeneration, and to identify differences in durability patterns, and to establish treatment recommendations for the lifetime management of patients with aortic stenosis. Parallel efforts to unmask the biomolecular differences in atherosclerotic plaque burden, valve calcification, and thrombotic diathesis, including host immunocompetence, between the different available bioprostheses, will further advance the role of emerging valve tissue technologies to improve durability. As with surgical heart valves, the optimal treatment options for redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical explant remain poorly understood. Ongoing translational research in bench testing coupled with prospectively designed core lab-adjudicated clinical trials are much needed. This report provides a contemporary overview of transcatheter structural valve degeneration, including evolving concepts in its pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) refers to MR resulting from left ventricular or left atrial remodeling. In ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular dilation (regional or global) leads to papillary muscle displacement, tethering, and leaflet malcoaptation. In atrial functional MR, MR occurs in patients with left atrial dilation and altered mitral annular geometry due to atrial fibrillation. In addition to cardiac remodeling, leaflet remodeling is increasingly recognized. Mitral leaflet tissue actively adapts through leaflet growth to ensure adequate coaptation. Leaflets, however, can also undergo maladaptive thickening and fibrosis, leading to increased stiffness. The balance of cardiac and leaflet remodeling is a key determinant in the development of secondary MR. Clinical management starts with detection, severity grading, and identification of the underlying mechanism, which relies heavily on echocardiography. Treatment of secondary MR consists of guideline-directed medical therapy, surgical repair or replacement, and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. Based on a better understanding of pathophysiology, novel percutaneous mitral repair and replacement devices have been developed and clinical trials are underway.

Background

Paravalvular leak (PVL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is frequent and the impact of mild PVL on outcomes remains uncertain. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of PVL on TAVI outcomes.

Methods

To analyze late outcomes of patients after TAVI according to the presence and severity of PVL, PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar were searched for studies that reported rates of all-cause mortality/survival and/or rehospitalization and/or cardiovascular mortality accompanied by at least one Kaplan-Meier curve for any of these outcomes. We adopted a 2-stage approach to reconstruct individual patient data based on the published Kaplan-Meier graphs.

Results

Thirty-eight studies with Kaplan-Meier curves met our eligibility criteria including over 25,000 patients. Patients with any degree of PVL after TAVI had a significantly higher risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio (HR), 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.43-1.61; p < 0.001), rehospitalization (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.54-2.12; p < 0.001), and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.33-1.75; p < 0.001) over time. These findings remained consistent when we stratified the results for the methods of assessment of PVL (i.e., echocardiography vs. angiography) and PVL severity. Both moderate/severe PVL and mild PVL were associated with increased risk of overall mortality (p < 0.001), rehospitalization (p < 0.001), and cardiovascular mortality (p < 0.001) during follow-up.

Conclusions

Patients with PVL, even if mild, experience higher risk of all-cause mortality, rehospitalization, and cardiovascular mortality following TAVI. These findings provide support to the implementation of procedural strategies to prevent any degree of PVL at the time of TAVI.

Background

There is an incomplete understanding of the predictors of morbidity and mortality in patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR). This study sought to identify key risk factors for all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization among patients with severe TR.

Methods

Patients with severe TR were identified from 2 centers, Oregon Health & Science University and Abrazo Health, from January 01, 2016 to December 31, 2018. Patients with any concomitant severe valvular diseases or prior valvular intervention were excluded. Multivariable regression was utilized to identify demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic variables independently associated with all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization.

Results

435 patients with severe TR were followed for a median of 2.8 years. The mean age of the population was 66.9 ± 18.5 years and 58% were female. All-cause mortality was identified in 20.5% of the population. Of the cohort, 35.4% of patients were hospitalized for HF. Isolated tricuspid valve intervention was performed in 2.5% of patients. Independent predictors of all-cause mortality included history of solid tumor (odds ratio [OR] 6.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-19.1, p = 0.001), history of peripheral artery disease (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-9.4, p = 0.013), and elevated international normalized ratio in the absence of anticoagulation (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.2, p = 0.008). Predictors of HF hospitalization included history of diabetes mellitus (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.0, p = 0.014) and history of reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 5.7, 95% CI 2.9-11.7, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Severe untreated TR is associated with high mortality and frequent HF hospitalizations. Understanding predictors of these outcomes is important to identify patients who may benefit from early tricuspid valve intervention to help improve outcomes in this patient population.