Structural Heart最新文献

Background

Patients with dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) taking midodrine may be at high risk for poor outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We evaluated dialysis-dependent ESRD patients taking midodrine.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of non-clinical trial TAVR patients from February 2012 to December 2020 from 11 facilities in a Western US health system. Patient groups included ESRD patients on midodrine before TAVR (ESRD [+M]), ESRD patients without midodrine (ESRD [−M]), and non-ESRD patients. The endpoints of 30-day and 1-year mortality were represented by Kaplan–Meier survival estimator and compared by log-rank test.

Results

Forty-five ESRD (+M), 216 ESRD (−M), and 6898 non-ESRD patients were included. ESRD patients had more comorbid conditions, despite no significant difference in predicted Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk between ESRD (+M) and ESRD (−M) (8.7% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.491). Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher for ESRD (+M) patients vs. ESRD (−M) patients (20.1% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.001) and for ESRD (+M) vs. non-ESRD patients (2.5%, p < 0.001). One-year mortality trended higher for ESRD (+M) vs. ESRD (−M) patients (41.9% vs. 29.8%, p = 0.07), and was significantly higher for ESRD (+M) vs. non-ESRD patients (10.7%, p < 0.001). Compared to ESRD (−M), ESRD (+M) patients had a higher incidence of 30-day stroke (6.7% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.033), 30-day vascular complications (6.7% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.011), and a lower rate of discharge to home (62.2% vs. 84.7%, p < 0.001). In contrast, ESRD (−M) patients had no significant differences from non-ESRD patients for these outcomes.

Conclusions

Our experience suggests ESRD patients on midodrine are a higher acuity population with worse survival after TAVR, compared to ESRD patients not on midodrine. These findings may help with risk stratification for ESRD patients undergoing TAVR.

Background

Cardiac computed tomography angiography was used to identify anatomical characteristics of the aortic root in patients with severe aortic regurgitation (AR) as compared to those with aortic stenosis (AS) to judge feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the JenaValve Trilogy system.

Methods

Cardiac computed tomography angiography was performed prior to planned TAVR for 107 patients with severe AR and 92 patients with severe AS. Measurements related to aortic root and coronary artery anatomy were obtained and compared between groups. Perimeter >90 mm and aortic annulus angle ​>70 degrees were defined as the theoretical exclusion criteria for TAVR. A combination of sinus of Valsalva diameter <30 mm and coronary height <12 mm was defined as high risk for coronary occlusion.

Results

The mean age of patients in the AR group was 74.9 ± 11.2 years, 46% were women, and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score for mortality was 3.6 ± 2.1. Comparatively, the mean age of patients in the AS group was 82.3 ± 5.53 years, 65% were women, and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeonsrisk score was 5.5 ± 3.3. Annulus area, perimeter, diameter, and angle were larger in patients with severe AR. Sinus of Valsalva diameters and heights were larger in patients with severe AR. More AR patients were excluded based on perimeter (14 vs. 2%) and annulus angle (6 vs. 1%). More AS patients exhibited high-risk anatomy for left main coronary occlusion (21 vs. 7%) and right coronary occlusion (14 vs. 3%). The maximum dimension of the ascending aorta was larger in patients with severe AR (39 vs. 35 mm). The percentage of referred AR patients with significant aortopathy requiring surgical intervention was very low (only 1 AR patient with ascending aorta diameter >5.5 cm).

Conclusions

A significantly larger proportion of patients with severe AR are excluded from TAVR as compared to AS due to large aortic annulus size and steep annulus angulation. By far the most prevalent excluding factor is aortic annulus size, with fewer patients excluded due to angulation. AR patients have lower-risk anatomy for coronary occlusion. Larger transcatheter valve sizes and further delivery system modifications are required to treat a larger proportion of AR patients.

Background

Cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) is overactivated in heart failure patients and associated with clinical outcomes. The aim of this study is to investigate the early effect of MitraClip repair on cardiac SNA.

Methods

We evaluated the change of cardiac SNA by ¹²³I- meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy in patients who underwent MitraClip repair from March 2019 to June 2020 in our hospital. Patients without acute procedural success were excluded, including patients who died or underwent mitral valve surgery before discharge. MIBG scintigraphy was performed at baseline and 1 ​month after MitraClip repair.

Results

We analyzed 48 patients (mean age 78.6 ± 10 years; 52.1% male; 37 secondary mitral regurgitation [SMR]/11 primary mitral regurgitation [PMR]). MR severity and New York Heart Association functional class significantly improved from baseline to 1 ​month after MitraClip repair (both p < 0.001). Overall, delay heart-mediastinum ratio (H/M) had no significant change, and washout rate (WR) showed a decreasing trend (delay H/M; pre 2.07 ± 0.46, post 2.05 ± 0.49, paired p = 0.348, WR; pre 36.1 ± 11.6%, post 33.6 ± 11.7%, paired p = 0.061). In PMR patients, WR was significantly decreased, however, delay H/M was not (delay H/M; pre 2.15 ± 0.50, post 2.10 ± 0.57, paired p = 0.019, WR; pre 34.6 ± 10.5%, post 26.7 ± 13.8%, paired p = 0.568). In contrast, in SMR patients, neither delay H/M nor WR were significantly changed (delay H/M; pre 2.05 ± 0.45, post 2.03 ± 0.47, paired p = 0.474, WR; pre 36.6 ± 11.9%, post 35.7 ± 10.4%, paired p = 0.523).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that MitraClip repair could significantly decrease cardiac SNA of WR in PMR patients during 1-month follow-up, however, in SMR patients, the significant change of MIBG parameters was not observed.

Structural heart disease is a rapidly evolving field. However, training in structural heart disease is still widely variable and has not been standardized. Furthermore, integration of trainees within the heart team has not been fully defined. In this review, we discuss the components and function of the heart team, the challenges of current structural heart disease models, and possible solutions and suggestions for integrating trainees within the heart team.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has emerged as the preferred treatment modality in most patients with severe aortic stenosis. With its global adoption and broader application in younger and healthier patients, the issue of transcatheter bioprosthetic valve degeneration and its impact on valve durability continues to earn clinical relevance. Differences in the pathophysiologic processes that separate native from transcatheter heart valve deterioration remain poorly understood. When compared to surgical aortic bioprostheses, the mechanisms of valve degeneration are similar in transcatheter heart valves, with meaningful differences most noticeably found between the individual constructs of their design. Recognizing the clinical and hemodynamic presentation of structural valve degeneration remains paramount. The recently revised consensus guidelines that incorporate the integration of advanced multimodality imaging with invasive hemodynamics represent a major step forward in our ability to accurately diagnose bioprosthetic valve degeneration, and to identify differences in durability patterns, and to establish treatment recommendations for the lifetime management of patients with aortic stenosis. Parallel efforts to unmask the biomolecular differences in atherosclerotic plaque burden, valve calcification, and thrombotic diathesis, including host immunocompetence, between the different available bioprostheses, will further advance the role of emerging valve tissue technologies to improve durability. As with surgical heart valves, the optimal treatment options for redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical explant remain poorly understood. Ongoing translational research in bench testing coupled with prospectively designed core lab-adjudicated clinical trials are much needed. This report provides a contemporary overview of transcatheter structural valve degeneration, including evolving concepts in its pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment.

Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) refers to MR resulting from left ventricular or left atrial remodeling. In ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular dilation (regional or global) leads to papillary muscle displacement, tethering, and leaflet malcoaptation. In atrial functional MR, MR occurs in patients with left atrial dilation and altered mitral annular geometry due to atrial fibrillation. In addition to cardiac remodeling, leaflet remodeling is increasingly recognized. Mitral leaflet tissue actively adapts through leaflet growth to ensure adequate coaptation. Leaflets, however, can also undergo maladaptive thickening and fibrosis, leading to increased stiffness. The balance of cardiac and leaflet remodeling is a key determinant in the development of secondary MR. Clinical management starts with detection, severity grading, and identification of the underlying mechanism, which relies heavily on echocardiography. Treatment of secondary MR consists of guideline-directed medical therapy, surgical repair or replacement, and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair. Based on a better understanding of pathophysiology, novel percutaneous mitral repair and replacement devices have been developed and clinical trials are underway.