Background
In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), it is unclear whether same-day discharge (SDD) while adopting a device-agnostic approach is a safe strategy compared to non-SDD. We aim to compare TAVI patients who underwent SDD and non-SDD according to a predefined protocol.
Methods
This is a prospective single-center study of consecutive patients who were scheduled for elective TAVI procedures. The primary endpoint was the composite of death, vascular access–related complications, any bleeding requiring hospitalization, all stroke (or transient ischemic attack), or new permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria.
Results
Out of 472 consecutive patients who underwent elective TAVI, 289 patients did not report procedural complications, of whom 60 (21%) were discharged on the same day. The mean age was 81 ± 7 years, with 60% of the cohort being male. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics among patients according to their in-hospital SDD strategy. Pre-existing left or right bundle branch block was comparable between the 2 groups. The primary endpoint was reported in 2.8% of the entire cohort, with no significant difference between patients who underwent SDD TAVI and those who did not (1.7% vs. 3.1%, respectively, p = 0.56). Patients who had a self-expanding valve had a comparable primary endpoint to those who had a balloon-expandable valve, including readmission for a permanent pacemaker.
Conclusions
SDD TAVI is a safe and feasible approach in patients who underwent an elective uneventful procedure, including patients who received self-expanding valves. Future studies are required to support these findings.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
