首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm最新文献

英文 中文
Time of Day of Induction Impacts the Total Duration of Labor. 引产时间影响分娩总持续时间。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101898
Kylie Cataldo, Robert Long, Isoken Olomnu, Rene Cortese, Hanne M Hoffmann

Background: Spontaneous labor and birth peak during the late evening and early morning hours, indicating a circadian influence on parturition. However, the effect of the time-of-day of labor induction (TOI) on labor duration and obstetric outcomes remains unexplored. We hypothesize that the time-of-day of labor induction will impact induction of labor (IOL) duration and the risk of cesarian section.

Objective: To determine whether TOI impacts IOL duration and delivery outcomes in term pregnancies, and whether maternal characteristics such as body mass index (BMI) and parity modulate this effect.

Study design: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 3,363 term pregnant subjects who underwent induction at a single U.S. hospital between 2019 and 2022. Time-of-induction was defined as the time of administration of the first cervical ripening agent or synthetic oxytocin (i.e., Pitocin). IOL duration was calculated as the time from induction to delivery. Multivariable analyses, survival models, and circadian rhythm analyses were performed to evaluate associations between TOI, IOL duration, cesarean delivery, and neonatal outcomes.

Results: IOL duration followed a significant circadian rhythm (p<0.05, Lomb-Scargle), with a gradual lengthening in IOL duration when induction was initiated later in the day, peaking at 23:00 hours (average IOL duration of 21.0 hours) as compared to induction at 05:00 hours (average IOL duration of 14.8 hours, p<0.01, Kruskal-Wallis test). Subjects induced during the early morning had up to 6 hours shorter labor compared to those induced in the late evening (p<0.01). The optimal time-of-day to initiate labor induction was influenced by BMI and parity with significant differences in probability of giving birth resulting from the time-of-day labor was induced for nulliparous obese (p<0.05, Two-way ANOVA), and parous obese subjects (p<0.05). Time-of-induction was associated with reduced cesarean delivery rates and did not impact rates of NICU admissions or adverse neonatal outcomes.

Conclusion: The time of day of initiation of labor induction influenced IOL duration, with the shortest duration when induced during early morning hours. No increase in adverse maternal and fetal outcomes was identified when controlling for time-of-day of labor induction. The optimal time-of-day to induce labor is influenced by BMI and parity and should be considered when performing this common obstetric intervention.

背景:自然分娩和分娩高峰发生在傍晚和清晨,表明昼夜节律对分娩有影响。然而,引产时间(TOI)对分娩持续时间和产科结局的影响仍未得到探讨。我们假设一天中引产的时间会影响引产(IOL)的持续时间和剖宫产的风险。目的:确定TOI是否会影响足月妊娠的IOL持续时间和分娩结果,以及母亲的身体质量指数(BMI)和胎次等特征是否会调节这种影响。研究设计:这项回顾性队列研究分析了2019年至2022年在一家美国医院接受引产的3363名足月孕妇。诱导时间定义为第一次使用宫颈催熟剂或人工合成催产素(即催产素)的时间。人工晶状体持续时间计算为从诱导到分娩的时间。通过多变量分析、生存模型和昼夜节律分析来评估TOI、人工晶状体持续时间、剖宫产和新生儿结局之间的关系。结果:人工晶状体的持续时间具有明显的昼夜节律(p)。结论:人工晶状体的持续时间受引产起始时间的影响,清晨引产时间最短。当控制引产时间时,未发现不良母婴结局增加。一天中引产的最佳时间受体重指数和胎次的影响,在进行这种常见的产科干预时应考虑。
{"title":"Time of Day of Induction Impacts the Total Duration of Labor.","authors":"Kylie Cataldo, Robert Long, Isoken Olomnu, Rene Cortese, Hanne M Hoffmann","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101898","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101898","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spontaneous labor and birth peak during the late evening and early morning hours, indicating a circadian influence on parturition. However, the effect of the time-of-day of labor induction (TOI) on labor duration and obstetric outcomes remains unexplored. We hypothesize that the time-of-day of labor induction will impact induction of labor (IOL) duration and the risk of cesarian section.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether TOI impacts IOL duration and delivery outcomes in term pregnancies, and whether maternal characteristics such as body mass index (BMI) and parity modulate this effect.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 3,363 term pregnant subjects who underwent induction at a single U.S. hospital between 2019 and 2022. Time-of-induction was defined as the time of administration of the first cervical ripening agent or synthetic oxytocin (i.e., Pitocin). IOL duration was calculated as the time from induction to delivery. Multivariable analyses, survival models, and circadian rhythm analyses were performed to evaluate associations between TOI, IOL duration, cesarean delivery, and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IOL duration followed a significant circadian rhythm (p<0.05, Lomb-Scargle), with a gradual lengthening in IOL duration when induction was initiated later in the day, peaking at 23:00 hours (average IOL duration of 21.0 hours) as compared to induction at 05:00 hours (average IOL duration of 14.8 hours, p<0.01, Kruskal-Wallis test). Subjects induced during the early morning had up to 6 hours shorter labor compared to those induced in the late evening (p<0.01). The optimal time-of-day to initiate labor induction was influenced by BMI and parity with significant differences in probability of giving birth resulting from the time-of-day labor was induced for nulliparous obese (p<0.05, Two-way ANOVA), and parous obese subjects (p<0.05). Time-of-induction was associated with reduced cesarean delivery rates and did not impact rates of NICU admissions or adverse neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The time of day of initiation of labor induction influenced IOL duration, with the shortest duration when induced during early morning hours. No increase in adverse maternal and fetal outcomes was identified when controlling for time-of-day of labor induction. The optimal time-of-day to induce labor is influenced by BMI and parity and should be considered when performing this common obstetric intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101898"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative effectiveness of two enhanced prenatal care models on preterm birth: An exploratory analysis of the EMBRACE randomized trial. 两种强化产前护理模式对早产的比较效果:一项EMBRACE随机试验的探索性分析。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101893
Daisy León-Martínez, Venise Curry, Kristin Carraway, Cinthia Blat, Kimberly Coleman-Phox, Bridgette E Blebu, Deborah Karasek, Brittany D Chambers Butcher, Patience A Afulani, Martha A Tesfalul, Jennifer N Felder, Guadalupe R Ramirez, Mary A Garza, Lauren Lessard, Christopher Downer, Larry Rand, Charles E McCulloch, Miriam Kuppermann
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of two enhanced prenatal care models on preterm birth: An exploratory analysis of the EMBRACE randomized trial.","authors":"Daisy León-Martínez, Venise Curry, Kristin Carraway, Cinthia Blat, Kimberly Coleman-Phox, Bridgette E Blebu, Deborah Karasek, Brittany D Chambers Butcher, Patience A Afulani, Martha A Tesfalul, Jennifer N Felder, Guadalupe R Ramirez, Mary A Garza, Lauren Lessard, Christopher Downer, Larry Rand, Charles E McCulloch, Miriam Kuppermann","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101893","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101893","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101893"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Induction at 38 weeks for large-for-gestational-age or macrosomic fetuses decreases the incidence of cesarean delivery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 38周大胎龄或巨大胎儿的引产可降低剖宫产的发生率:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101897
Ilaria Paladino, Vincenzo Berghella
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several studies compared induction of labor to expectant management in singleton pregnancies with suspected large-for-gestational-age (LGA) or macrosomic fetuses. However, the most appropriate management, including the option of induction of labor, and at what gestational age, remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of labor induction for pregnancies with LGA or macrosomic fetuses on mode of delivery, and maternal and perinatal morbidity, and to evaluate the best gestational age for such induction if beneficial.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A systematic literature search of electronic databases was conducted through November 1, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including term singleton pregnancies with suspected large-for-gestational-age (LGA) or macrosomic fetuses comparing induction of labor (IOL) with expectant management were included. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery, with secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes assessed. Pooled estimates were initially calculated using a fixed-effects model; random-effects analyses using a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimator were subsequently performed and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² and τ² statistics. ..</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five randomized trials including 4,083 pregnant individuals were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Most participants underwent induction at 38 weeks with the largest RCT (71% of the total sample of this meta-analysis), inducing labour at 38 0/7 - 38 4/7 weeks, for LGA > 90<sup>th</sup> percentile.. For the primary outcome, IOL was associated with significant lower risk of cesarean delivery (27.9% vs 31.9%; risk ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.96). with no heterogeneity. Among secondary outcomes, induction of labor reduced the incidence of macrosomia ≥4,000 g (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.48-0.59) and ≥4,500 g (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.39). Shoulder dystocia (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.03) and fetal fracture (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-1.05) showed a trend toward risk reduction without reaching statistical significance in random-effects analyses. Phototherapy was more frequent following induction of labor (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.17-2.25), whereas other neonatal and maternal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Induction of labor between 38 0/7 - 38 4/7 weeks for suspected LGA (EFW >90<sup>th</sup> percentile) or macrosomic fetuses may be a reasonable management option, as it is associated with significant reductions in cesarean delivery, and a potential reduction in shoulder dystocia, and neonatal fractures, compared to expectant management. As the strongest evidence derives from induction at 38 0/7 - 38 4/7 weeks, counseling should emphasize this gestational window. Approximately 25 inductions of labor for EFW >90th percentile at 38 0/7 - 38 4/7 weeks would be required to prevent one cesarean d
背景:几项研究比较了怀疑大胎龄(LGA)或巨大胎儿的单胎妊娠引产和待产管理。然而,最适当的管理,包括引产的选择,以及在什么胎龄,仍不清楚。目的:评价LGA或巨大胎儿妊娠引产对分娩方式、孕产妇及围产儿发病率的影响,并评价引产的最佳胎龄。研究设计:对电子数据库进行系统文献检索,截止日期为2025年11月1日。随机对照试验(RCTs)包括怀疑胎龄大的足月单胎妊娠(LGA)或巨大胎儿,比较引产(IOL)与预期管理。主要结局是剖宫产,其次是孕产妇和新生儿结局。混合估计最初使用固定效应模型计算;随后使用受限最大似然(REML)估计器进行随机效应分析,并使用I²和τ²统计量评估异质性。结果:分析了5项随机试验,包括4083名孕妇。各组间基线特征具有可比性。大多数参与者在38周时进行了引产,最大的RCT(占该荟萃分析总样本的71%),在38周0/7 - 38周4/7引产,LGA bb0第90百分位。对于主要结局,人工晶状体与剖宫产风险显著降低相关(27.9% vs 31.9%;风险比0.87,95%可信区间0.79-0.96)。没有异质性。在次要结局中,引产降低了巨大儿≥4000 g (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.48-0.59)和≥4500 g (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.39)的发生率。在随机效应分析中,肩难产(RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.03)和胎儿骨折(RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-1.05)有降低风险的趋势,但无统计学意义。引产后光疗更常见(RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.17-2.25),而其他新生儿和产妇结局在两组间无显著差异。结论:对于疑似LGA (EFW bb0 90百分位数)或巨大胎儿,在38 0/7 - 38 4/7周引产可能是一个合理的处理选择,因为与预期处理相比,它与剖宫产的显著减少有关,并且可能减少肩部难产和新生儿骨折。由于最有力的证据来自于38 0/7 - 38 4/7周的引产,咨询应强调这一妊娠窗口期。在38 0/7 - 38 4/7周时,EFW bb的第90百分位需要大约25次引产才能防止一次剖宫产。
{"title":"Induction at 38 weeks for large-for-gestational-age or macrosomic fetuses decreases the incidence of cesarean delivery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Ilaria Paladino, Vincenzo Berghella","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101897","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101897","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Several studies compared induction of labor to expectant management in singleton pregnancies with suspected large-for-gestational-age (LGA) or macrosomic fetuses. However, the most appropriate management, including the option of induction of labor, and at what gestational age, remains unclear.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To evaluate the effects of labor induction for pregnancies with LGA or macrosomic fetuses on mode of delivery, and maternal and perinatal morbidity, and to evaluate the best gestational age for such induction if beneficial.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Study design: &lt;/strong&gt;A systematic literature search of electronic databases was conducted through November 1, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including term singleton pregnancies with suspected large-for-gestational-age (LGA) or macrosomic fetuses comparing induction of labor (IOL) with expectant management were included. The primary outcome was cesarean delivery, with secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes assessed. Pooled estimates were initially calculated using a fixed-effects model; random-effects analyses using a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimator were subsequently performed and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² and τ² statistics. ..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Five randomized trials including 4,083 pregnant individuals were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Most participants underwent induction at 38 weeks with the largest RCT (71% of the total sample of this meta-analysis), inducing labour at 38 0/7 - 38 4/7 weeks, for LGA &gt; 90&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; percentile.. For the primary outcome, IOL was associated with significant lower risk of cesarean delivery (27.9% vs 31.9%; risk ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.96). with no heterogeneity. Among secondary outcomes, induction of labor reduced the incidence of macrosomia ≥4,000 g (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.48-0.59) and ≥4,500 g (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.12-0.39). Shoulder dystocia (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.03) and fetal fracture (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-1.05) showed a trend toward risk reduction without reaching statistical significance in random-effects analyses. Phototherapy was more frequent following induction of labor (RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.17-2.25), whereas other neonatal and maternal outcomes did not differ significantly between groups.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;Induction of labor between 38 0/7 - 38 4/7 weeks for suspected LGA (EFW &gt;90&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; percentile) or macrosomic fetuses may be a reasonable management option, as it is associated with significant reductions in cesarean delivery, and a potential reduction in shoulder dystocia, and neonatal fractures, compared to expectant management. As the strongest evidence derives from induction at 38 0/7 - 38 4/7 weeks, counseling should emphasize this gestational window. Approximately 25 inductions of labor for EFW &gt;90th percentile at 38 0/7 - 38 4/7 weeks would be required to prevent one cesarean d","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101897"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CTA as preferred imaging modality for pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: an update on diagnostic imaging rates CTA作为妊娠期肺栓塞的首选成像方式:诊断显像率的最新进展。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101892
Suzanne O’Nan MD, Julia Burd MD, Nandini Raghuraman MD, MSCI, Antonina Frolova MD, PhD, Michael Dombrowski MD, Roxane Rampersad MD, Alison Cahill MD, MSCI, Jeannie Kelly MD, MS
{"title":"CTA as preferred imaging modality for pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: an update on diagnostic imaging rates","authors":"Suzanne O’Nan MD,&nbsp;Julia Burd MD,&nbsp;Nandini Raghuraman MD, MSCI,&nbsp;Antonina Frolova MD, PhD,&nbsp;Michael Dombrowski MD,&nbsp;Roxane Rampersad MD,&nbsp;Alison Cahill MD, MSCI,&nbsp;Jeannie Kelly MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101892","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101892","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"8 4","pages":"Article 101892"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
First trimester risk stratification algorithm for placenta accreta spectrum. 胎盘增生谱的妊娠早期风险分层算法。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101891
Alesha White, Jessica E Pruszynski, Quyen N Do, Diane M Twickler, Catherine Y Spong, Christina L Herrera

Background: Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is imperfect with cases undiagnosed prior to delivery resulting in suboptimal outcomes. Currently, there is no agreed upon standardized protocol for risk-stratification of PAS. Most patients are identified in the 2nd or 3rd trimester, although findings on first trimester ultrasound may be associated with development of PAS. At present, there is no recommended risk stratification algorithm that applies first trimester findings in a systematic manner with outcome data.

Objective: Development of a risk stratification algorithm for PAS in the first trimester of pregnancy in symptomatic patients STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study of first trimester sonograms between January 2021 and February 2024 compared the performance of low implantation with prior cesarean delivery (CD) to a newly developed risk stratification algorithm. Low implantation was diagnosed when the distance of the inferior border of trophoblastic change or the border of the gestational sac was 5 centimeters (cm) or less from the external os on ultrasound imaging. Pregnancies were analyzed based on gestational sac location (<10 weeks) or decidual basalis (≥10 weeks) and smallest myometrial thickness (SMT) to assess PAS risk. Test parameters of low implantation and the new risk stratification algorithm were calculated. Inter-reader variability of the SMT measurement with kappa statistic and McNemar's test was performed.

Results: Of 6213 patients with first trimester sonography and known delivery outcome, 1252 had a prior CD and 257/1252 (20.5%) of these had low implantation. Of 12 patients with confirmed PAS, 10 had low implantation. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of low implantation for PAS were 83.3%, 80%, and 3.8% respectively. Of these 257, 245 had adequate images to test the new algorithm. Of 245, 10 (4.1%) screened positive. PAS was confirmed in 9 of 10 with positive screens, with sensitivity, specificity, and PPV for PAS of 90%, 99.6%, and 90% respectively. Weighted kappa statistic of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.46-0.83) and McNemar's test p-value of 0.24 indicated substantial agreement.

Conclusion: Our first trimester risk stratification algorithm was more sensitive and specific for PAS with higher PPV when compared to low implantation with prior CD. Inter-reader agreement was also high. Future prospective studies to validate this risk stratification algorithm are needed.

背景:胎盘增生谱(PAS)的产前诊断是不完善的,分娩前未确诊的病例导致次优结局。目前,对PAS的风险分层没有统一的标准方案。大多数患者在妊娠第二或第三个月被发现,尽管妊娠早期超声检查的结果可能与PAS的发展有关。目前,还没有推荐的风险分层算法,以系统的方式应用妊娠早期发现和结局数据。研究设计:对2021年1月至2024年2月的早期妊娠超声进行回顾性观察研究,比较低植入术前剖宫产(CD)与新开发的风险分层算法的性能。当超声显示滋养层改变的下边界或孕囊边界与外胚轴的距离小于等于5厘米时,诊断为低着床。根据妊娠囊位置分析妊娠(结果:6213例妊娠早期超声检查和已知分娩结局的患者中,1252例既往有CD,其中257/1252例(20.5%)有低着床。在12例确诊PAS患者中,10例植入物低。PAS低植入的敏感性为83.3%,特异性为80%,阳性预测值(PPV)为3.8%。在这257个样本中,245个样本有足够的图像来测试新算法。245例中,10例(4.1%)筛查阳性。10例阳性筛查中有9例证实PAS, PAS的敏感性、特异性和PPV分别为90%、99.6%和90%。加权kappa统计量为0.65 (95% CI: 0.46-0.83), McNemar检验p值为0.24,表明两者之间存在很大的一致性。结论:我们的妊娠早期风险分层算法对PPV较高的PAS患者更为敏感和特异,与先前CD的低植入相比。读者间一致性也很高。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证这种风险分层算法。
{"title":"First trimester risk stratification algorithm for placenta accreta spectrum.","authors":"Alesha White, Jessica E Pruszynski, Quyen N Do, Diane M Twickler, Catherine Y Spong, Christina L Herrera","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101891","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101891","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is imperfect with cases undiagnosed prior to delivery resulting in suboptimal outcomes. Currently, there is no agreed upon standardized protocol for risk-stratification of PAS. Most patients are identified in the 2<sup>nd</sup> or 3<sup>rd</sup> trimester, although findings on first trimester ultrasound may be associated with development of PAS. At present, there is no recommended risk stratification algorithm that applies first trimester findings in a systematic manner with outcome data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Development of a risk stratification algorithm for PAS in the first trimester of pregnancy in symptomatic patients STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study of first trimester sonograms between January 2021 and February 2024 compared the performance of low implantation with prior cesarean delivery (CD) to a newly developed risk stratification algorithm. Low implantation was diagnosed when the distance of the inferior border of trophoblastic change or the border of the gestational sac was 5 centimeters (cm) or less from the external os on ultrasound imaging. Pregnancies were analyzed based on gestational sac location (<10 weeks) or decidual basalis (≥10 weeks) and smallest myometrial thickness (SMT) to assess PAS risk. Test parameters of low implantation and the new risk stratification algorithm were calculated. Inter-reader variability of the SMT measurement with kappa statistic and McNemar's test was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6213 patients with first trimester sonography and known delivery outcome, 1252 had a prior CD and 257/1252 (20.5%) of these had low implantation. Of 12 patients with confirmed PAS, 10 had low implantation. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of low implantation for PAS were 83.3%, 80%, and 3.8% respectively. Of these 257, 245 had adequate images to test the new algorithm. Of 245, 10 (4.1%) screened positive. PAS was confirmed in 9 of 10 with positive screens, with sensitivity, specificity, and PPV for PAS of 90%, 99.6%, and 90% respectively. Weighted kappa statistic of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.46-0.83) and McNemar's test p-value of 0.24 indicated substantial agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our first trimester risk stratification algorithm was more sensitive and specific for PAS with higher PPV when compared to low implantation with prior CD. Inter-reader agreement was also high. Future prospective studies to validate this risk stratification algorithm are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101891"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146020110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Placental cytogenetic testing for confined placental mosaicism and obstetrical outcomes after discordant cell-free DNA screening results. 无细胞DNA筛查结果不一致后,限制性胎盘嵌合体的胎盘细胞遗传学检测和产科结局。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101887
Yvette Raymond, Shavi Fernando, Melody Menezes, Ben W Mol, Emma Brown, Kirsten Arnold, Daniel L Rolnik

Background: A false-positive cell-free DNA prenatal screening result may arise from confined placental mosaicism, however, the frequency and obstetrical ramifications of such cases are poorly understood.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of confined placental mosaicism among pregnancies with false-positive cell-free DNA results and the associated obstetrical outcomes.

Study design: This was a prospective, matched-cohort study with a 1:2 ratio of cases with false-positive cell-free DNA results and controls with low-risk cell-free DNA results that were matched by maternal age and body mass index. Participants were recruited between November 2022 and March 2025 at Monash Health and Monash Ultrasound for Women in Melbourne, Australia. Cytogenetic testing was conducted on 4 biopsies per placenta to investigate confined placental mosaicism. The cases and matched controls were compared using trio matching identifiers as random effect in conditional logistic regression and linear mixed-effects modelling.

Results: A total of 60 cases with false-positive cell-free DNA results were matched with 120 controls. Confined placental mosaicism was observed in 20 of the 60 cases (33.3%) and in none of the controls. The prevalence of confined placental mosaicism was highest among those with rare autosomal trisomy (57.9%; 11/19) and monosomy X (75.5%; 3/4) results. Confined placental mosaicism was also observed following common autosomal trisomy results (21.4%; 3/14) and subchromosomal copy number variants (15.8%; 3/19). The median birth weight percentile was significantly lower among instances of confirmed confined placental mosaicism (20.1; interquartile range, 9.9-48.5) than among matched controls (43.5; interquartile range, 17.1-66.1; P=.049); however, there were no statistically significant increases in small-for-gestational-age neonates or other adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Conclusion: Confined placental mosaicism is a frequent contributor to false-positive cell-free DNA results, most often for monosomy X and rare autosomal trisomy results. Although the birth weight median percentiles were lower, the outcomes of cell-free DNA-detected confined placental mosaicism in this average-risk cohort were predominantly favorable. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

背景:无细胞DNA (cfDNA)产前筛查结果假阳性可能是由局限性胎盘嵌合体(CPM)引起的,尽管这种情况的频率和产科后果尚不清楚。目的:评估假阳性cfDNA结果中CPM的患病率以及相关的产科结局。研究设计:这是一项前瞻性匹配队列研究,cfDNA假阳性病例和低风险cfDNA对照组的比例为1:2,与母亲年龄和体重指数(BMI)相匹配。参与者于2022年11月至2025年3月在澳大利亚墨尔本的莫纳什健康和莫纳什妇女超声中心招募。对每个胎盘进行4次活检进行细胞遗传学检测以研究CPM。使用条件逻辑回归和线性混合效应模型,将病例和匹配对照进行随机效应的三人匹配标识符比较。结果:60例cfDNA假阳性与120例对照相匹配。60例患者中有20例(33.3%)出现CPM,对照组中无CPM。罕见常染色体三体(RAT)(57.9%, 11/19)和X单体(75.5%,3/4)中CPM患病率最高。在常见常染色体三体(21.4%,3/14)和亚染色体拷贝数变异(15.8%,3/19)结果中也观察到CPM。确诊CPM病例的出生体重百分位数中位数(20.1,四分位数间距(IQR) 9.9 - 48.5)显著低于匹配对照组(43.5,IQR 17.1 - 66.1, p = 0.049);然而,小胎龄新生儿或其他不良妊娠结局没有统计学上的显著增加。结论:CPM是导致cfDNA结果假阳性的常见因素,最常见的是X单体和RAT结果。虽然出生体重中位数较低,但在这个平均风险队列中,cfdna检测的CPM结果主要是有利的。
{"title":"Placental cytogenetic testing for confined placental mosaicism and obstetrical outcomes after discordant cell-free DNA screening results.","authors":"Yvette Raymond, Shavi Fernando, Melody Menezes, Ben W Mol, Emma Brown, Kirsten Arnold, Daniel L Rolnik","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101887","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101887","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A false-positive cell-free DNA prenatal screening result may arise from confined placental mosaicism, however, the frequency and obstetrical ramifications of such cases are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the prevalence of confined placental mosaicism among pregnancies with false-positive cell-free DNA results and the associated obstetrical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a prospective, matched-cohort study with a 1:2 ratio of cases with false-positive cell-free DNA results and controls with low-risk cell-free DNA results that were matched by maternal age and body mass index. Participants were recruited between November 2022 and March 2025 at Monash Health and Monash Ultrasound for Women in Melbourne, Australia. Cytogenetic testing was conducted on 4 biopsies per placenta to investigate confined placental mosaicism. The cases and matched controls were compared using trio matching identifiers as random effect in conditional logistic regression and linear mixed-effects modelling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 cases with false-positive cell-free DNA results were matched with 120 controls. Confined placental mosaicism was observed in 20 of the 60 cases (33.3%) and in none of the controls. The prevalence of confined placental mosaicism was highest among those with rare autosomal trisomy (57.9%; 11/19) and monosomy X (75.5%; 3/4) results. Confined placental mosaicism was also observed following common autosomal trisomy results (21.4%; 3/14) and subchromosomal copy number variants (15.8%; 3/19). The median birth weight percentile was significantly lower among instances of confirmed confined placental mosaicism (20.1; interquartile range, 9.9-48.5) than among matched controls (43.5; interquartile range, 17.1-66.1; P=.049); however, there were no statistically significant increases in small-for-gestational-age neonates or other adverse pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Confined placental mosaicism is a frequent contributor to false-positive cell-free DNA results, most often for monosomy X and rare autosomal trisomy results. Although the birth weight median percentiles were lower, the outcomes of cell-free DNA-detected confined placental mosaicism in this average-risk cohort were predominantly favorable. VIDEO ABSTRACT.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101887"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145953312","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Continuous glucose monitoring in gestational diabetes mellitus: a tool, not a treatment 妊娠期糖尿病的持续血糖监测:一种工具,而不是治疗方法
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101877
Ashley N. Battarbee MD, MSCR
{"title":"Continuous glucose monitoring in gestational diabetes mellitus: a tool, not a treatment","authors":"Ashley N. Battarbee MD, MSCR","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101877","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101877","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"8 2","pages":"Article 101877"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145926635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Guideline gaps in emergency cerclage: evidence limitations and future directions. 紧急环切术的指南缺口:证据限制和未来方向。
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101889
Aya Mudrik, Misgav Rottenstreich
{"title":"Guideline gaps in emergency cerclage: evidence limitations and future directions.","authors":"Aya Mudrik, Misgav Rottenstreich","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101889","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101889","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101889"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145935245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antenatal corticosteroid use at 22 weeks: balancing guideline authority with evidence quality 22周产前皮质类固醇使用:平衡指南权威与证据质量
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101822
Can Ata MD, Ufuk Atlihan MD
{"title":"Antenatal corticosteroid use at 22 weeks: balancing guideline authority with evidence quality","authors":"Can Ata MD,&nbsp;Ufuk Atlihan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101822","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101822","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 101822"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145924351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Underlying placental pathology lesions in pregnant individuals with diabetes and decreasing insulin requirements 潜在的胎盘病理病变妊娠个体糖尿病和降低胰岛素需求
IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101826
Karen TY Wong MD MSc, Shane Khan MD, Alaa Husain MD, Asmaa Alahmadi MD, Youssef Nasr BSc, Dina El Demellawy MD, Ana Werlang MD
{"title":"Underlying placental pathology lesions in pregnant individuals with diabetes and decreasing insulin requirements","authors":"Karen TY Wong MD MSc,&nbsp;Shane Khan MD,&nbsp;Alaa Husain MD,&nbsp;Asmaa Alahmadi MD,&nbsp;Youssef Nasr BSc,&nbsp;Dina El Demellawy MD,&nbsp;Ana Werlang MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101826","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101826","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 101826"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145924353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1