Objective
Periodontal disease is associated with increased risk of preterm birth. Effective management during pregnancy may reduce preterm birth, though clinical trial evidence has been inconsistent. This study aimed to assess whether treating dental disease during pregnancy reduces preterm birth.
Data Sources
A systematic search was performed of EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and trial registries up to December 2023 and re-run in January 2025.
Study Eligibility Criteria
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling pregnant persons with any dental disease randomized to receive dental treatment vs no treatment were included. No language restriction was applied.
Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods
Data were independently extracted by two researchers and assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, RoB 2. A random effect meta-analysis was performed with the Mantel–Haenszel variance estimate. Certainty of evidence (COE) was assessed using GRADE. The main outcome was preterm birth (<37 weeks’ gestation). Data on low birth weight were also collected.
Results
Fourteen RCTs (8316 participants) were included. Interventions included scaling and root planing (SRP) alone (8 RCTs), SRP with chlorhexidine mouthwash (4 RCTs), and cetylpyridinium chloride mouthwash (2 RCTs). Meta-analysis and GRADE assessment found moderate-certainty evidence suggesting that periodontal treatment results in a 15% relative risk reduction of preterm birth (risk ratio [RR] 0.85; 95% CI 0.71–1.02) compared to minimal periodontal treatment or no treatment (absolute difference 20 fewer preterm births per 1000 individuals; 95% CI from 39 fewer to 3 more). It is uncertain whether the addition of chlorhexidine mouthwash to SRP reduces preterm birth rates (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.23–1.04, very low COE).
Conclusion
This meta-analysis, the largest and most up-to-date on this topic, suggests that treating periodontal disease during pregnancy may reduce the risk of preterm birth. However, limitations, such as the risk of bias and variations in populations and treatment, highlight the need for well-powered RCTs with low risk of bias to evaluate the most effective dental treatment strategies. Future studies should focus on established dental disease severity and explore different dental treatment strategies, including antimicrobial mouthwash.
扫码关注我们
求助内容:
应助结果提醒方式:
