首页 > 最新文献

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm最新文献

英文 中文
Labor roulette: the probability of achieving spontaneous labor in normal-risk nulliparous patients 产程轮盘赌:正常风险无产患者实现自然分娩的概率。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101590
Sarah M. Nicholson MB, Susan Hatt MSc, Corina I. Oprescu MD, Sara N. EL Nimr MB, Michael P. Geary MD, Patrick Dicker MSc, Zara E. Molphy PhD, Karen Flood MD, Fergal D. Malone MD
{"title":"Labor roulette: the probability of achieving spontaneous labor in normal-risk nulliparous patients","authors":"Sarah M. Nicholson MB, Susan Hatt MSc, Corina I. Oprescu MD, Sara N. EL Nimr MB, Michael P. Geary MD, Patrick Dicker MSc, Zara E. Molphy PhD, Karen Flood MD, Fergal D. Malone MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101590","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101590","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 101590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143013237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prenatal exome sequencing for the structurally normal fetus: ready or not? 结构正常胎儿的产前外显子组测序:准备好了吗?
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101513
Teresa N. Sparks MD, MAS
{"title":"Prenatal exome sequencing for the structurally normal fetus: ready or not?","authors":"Teresa N. Sparks MD, MAS","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101513","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101513","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 101513"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142910957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The effect of fixed time–interval and on-demand analgesia protocols for post–cesarean pain on maternal chronic pain and child development–follow-up of randomized controlled trial 剖宫产后镇痛定时间隔和按需镇痛方案对产妇慢性疼痛和儿童发育的影响——随机对照试验随访。
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101591
Enav Yefet MD, PhD, Noa Frishman Martsiano MD, Ilanit Elbaz Shchory PhD, Zohar Nachum MD, MHA
{"title":"The effect of fixed time–interval and on-demand analgesia protocols for post–cesarean pain on maternal chronic pain and child development–follow-up of randomized controlled trial","authors":"Enav Yefet MD, PhD, Noa Frishman Martsiano MD, Ilanit Elbaz Shchory PhD, Zohar Nachum MD, MHA","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101591","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101591","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 101591"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142928384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cerclage in singleton pregnancies with no prior spontaneous PTB and short cervix: a randomized controlled trial.
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101602
Rupsa C Boelig, Chiara Tersigni, Nicoletta Di Simone, Gabriele Saccone, Fabio Facchinetti, Giovanni Scambia, Vincenzo Berghella
<p><strong>Background: </strong>PTB (PTB) remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Cerclage for short cervical length (CL) ≤25mm in singletons with a history of spontaneous PTB is associated with decreased neonatal morbidity/mortality. Both vaginal progesterone and cerclage individually have level 1 evidence supporting benefit in prevention of PTB in pregnancies complicated by short CL, however there is a paucity of level 1 evidence regarding the potential benefit of cerclage with progesterone compared to progesterone alone for short CL ≤25mm in singletons without a history of spontaneous PTB.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to conduct a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to evaluate the additional benefit of cerclage with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone alone in singletons without prior spontaneous PTB and with a current mid-trimester transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) CL ≤25mm STUDY DESIGN: This is a multicenter international randomized controlled trial from 09/2017-09/2023 with four sites in the United States and Italy. Singleton pregnancies without prior spontaneous PTB received TVUCL (universal) screening during mid-trimester anatomy ultrasound as part of routine care. Inclusion criteria was TVUCL≤25mm at 18 0/7 - 23 6/7 weeks. Exclusion criteria included current or planned cerclage, cervical dilation, symptoms of labor, infection, bleeding, rupture of membranes at screening. Participants were randomized 1:1 to cerclage with vaginal progesterone (200mg vaginal progesterone daily) or vaginal progesterone alone; randomization was stratified by study site and TVUCL≤15mm. Primary outcome was PTB<35 weeks by intention to treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included PTB <37,32,28,24 weeks, gestational age at delivery, latency to delivery, and neonatal outcomes. Categorical variables were compared with Pearson Chi-Square and relative risk (RR) estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous variables compared with Mann Whitney U test. Latency to delivery and gestational age at delivery were also compared with Kaplan Meier Survival Curve. Planned enrollment was N=206 based on an estimated 0.54 relative risk with cerclage and a 34% incidence of PTB with standard care. The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03251729) on June 22, 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Enrollment ran from September 22<sup>nd</sup>, 2017- October 31<sup>st</sup>, 2023, and it was halted early due to lagging enrollment. Ninety-three participants were randomized, three were excluded due to withdrawal (n=1) and loss to follow up (n=2). Of the 90 included in the intention to treat analysis, 43 to cerclage and progesterone, and 47 to progesterone alone. Overall, 40 (40.4%) had a TVUCL≤15mm. There was no significant difference in primary outcome PTB<35 weeks in those randomized to cerclage with progesterone vs progesterone alone: 16.3% vs 23.4%, RR 0.70 (0.30-1.63). Those randomized to cerclage with progesteron
{"title":"Cerclage in singleton pregnancies with no prior spontaneous PTB and short cervix: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Rupsa C Boelig, Chiara Tersigni, Nicoletta Di Simone, Gabriele Saccone, Fabio Facchinetti, Giovanni Scambia, Vincenzo Berghella","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101602","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101602","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;PTB (PTB) remains a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Cerclage for short cervical length (CL) ≤25mm in singletons with a history of spontaneous PTB is associated with decreased neonatal morbidity/mortality. Both vaginal progesterone and cerclage individually have level 1 evidence supporting benefit in prevention of PTB in pregnancies complicated by short CL, however there is a paucity of level 1 evidence regarding the potential benefit of cerclage with progesterone compared to progesterone alone for short CL ≤25mm in singletons without a history of spontaneous PTB.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;We aimed to conduct a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to evaluate the additional benefit of cerclage with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone alone in singletons without prior spontaneous PTB and with a current mid-trimester transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) CL ≤25mm STUDY DESIGN: This is a multicenter international randomized controlled trial from 09/2017-09/2023 with four sites in the United States and Italy. Singleton pregnancies without prior spontaneous PTB received TVUCL (universal) screening during mid-trimester anatomy ultrasound as part of routine care. Inclusion criteria was TVUCL≤25mm at 18 0/7 - 23 6/7 weeks. Exclusion criteria included current or planned cerclage, cervical dilation, symptoms of labor, infection, bleeding, rupture of membranes at screening. Participants were randomized 1:1 to cerclage with vaginal progesterone (200mg vaginal progesterone daily) or vaginal progesterone alone; randomization was stratified by study site and TVUCL≤15mm. Primary outcome was PTB&lt;35 weeks by intention to treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included PTB &lt;37,32,28,24 weeks, gestational age at delivery, latency to delivery, and neonatal outcomes. Categorical variables were compared with Pearson Chi-Square and relative risk (RR) estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI). Continuous variables compared with Mann Whitney U test. Latency to delivery and gestational age at delivery were also compared with Kaplan Meier Survival Curve. Planned enrollment was N=206 based on an estimated 0.54 relative risk with cerclage and a 34% incidence of PTB with standard care. The trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03251729) on June 22, 2017.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Enrollment ran from September 22&lt;sup&gt;nd&lt;/sup&gt;, 2017- October 31&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt;, 2023, and it was halted early due to lagging enrollment. Ninety-three participants were randomized, three were excluded due to withdrawal (n=1) and loss to follow up (n=2). Of the 90 included in the intention to treat analysis, 43 to cerclage and progesterone, and 47 to progesterone alone. Overall, 40 (40.4%) had a TVUCL≤15mm. There was no significant difference in primary outcome PTB&lt;35 weeks in those randomized to cerclage with progesterone vs progesterone alone: 16.3% vs 23.4%, RR 0.70 (0.30-1.63). Those randomized to cerclage with progesteron","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101602"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143068385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Postpartum furosemide for accelerating recovery in patients with preeclampsia: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial: Furosemide for postpartum hypertension.
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101614
Telma Cursino, Leila Katz, Isabela Coutinho, Alex Sandro Rolland de Souza, Thais Valeria Silva, Melania Amorim

Background: Preeclampsia is a major hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, which may lead to severe complications, particularly in the first two weeks of the postpartum period. During the postpartum period, blood pressure levels remain high, often increasing to levels higher than those experienced during pregnancy. Furosemide, a fast-acting diuretic, reduces the intravascular volume overload and may represent an alternative to accelerate the normalization of blood pressure levels.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of furosemide compared to placebo for blood pressure control in the postpartum period in women with severe preeclampsia.

Study design: In a triple-masked placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, women in the postpartum period with de novo preeclampsia with severe features or eclampsia diagnosed during pregnancy and adequate diuresis, who had received magnesium sulfate, were randomized to receive furosemide (40 mg/day orally for five days) or placebo. The primary outcomes were mean blood pressure levels. Secondary outcomes were: frequency of severe hypertensive episodes, a continued need for antihypertensives, number of antihypertensives used to control blood pressure, length of hospital stay, adverse effects and maternal complications. A sample size of 120 patients was estimated, 60 in each arm of the study, based on the estimated difference between the mean systolic pressure of 142±12mmHg for the furosemide group and 153±19mmHg for the placebo group.

Results: Between June 20 and November 30, 2014, 271 women were screened and 120 were randomized to furosemide or placebo, with 118 being included in the final analysis (58 in the furosemide group and 60 in the placebo group). Most characteristics were similar in both groups. Mean daily systolic and diastolic pressure was lower in the furosemide group (P<0.001) and there were fewer episodes of severe hypertension on the second (P=0.04) and fifth (P=0.04) days. In addition, shorter time was required until blood pressure was controlled (P=0.01) in the furosemide group.

Conclusion: Compared to placebo, 40 mg/day of oral furosemide in patients with preeclampsia in the postpartum period reduced mean daily systolic blood pressure in 1st and 5th days and mean daily diastolic blood pressure in 1st, 2nd and 5th days and the time required until blood pressure is controlled.

{"title":"Postpartum furosemide for accelerating recovery in patients with preeclampsia: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial: Furosemide for postpartum hypertension.","authors":"Telma Cursino, Leila Katz, Isabela Coutinho, Alex Sandro Rolland de Souza, Thais Valeria Silva, Melania Amorim","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101614","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101614","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preeclampsia is a major hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, which may lead to severe complications, particularly in the first two weeks of the postpartum period. During the postpartum period, blood pressure levels remain high, often increasing to levels higher than those experienced during pregnancy. Furosemide, a fast-acting diuretic, reduces the intravascular volume overload and may represent an alternative to accelerate the normalization of blood pressure levels.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of furosemide compared to placebo for blood pressure control in the postpartum period in women with severe preeclampsia.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In a triple-masked placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, women in the postpartum period with de novo preeclampsia with severe features or eclampsia diagnosed during pregnancy and adequate diuresis, who had received magnesium sulfate, were randomized to receive furosemide (40 mg/day orally for five days) or placebo. The primary outcomes were mean blood pressure levels. Secondary outcomes were: frequency of severe hypertensive episodes, a continued need for antihypertensives, number of antihypertensives used to control blood pressure, length of hospital stay, adverse effects and maternal complications. A sample size of 120 patients was estimated, 60 in each arm of the study, based on the estimated difference between the mean systolic pressure of 142±12mmHg for the furosemide group and 153±19mmHg for the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 20 and November 30, 2014, 271 women were screened and 120 were randomized to furosemide or placebo, with 118 being included in the final analysis (58 in the furosemide group and 60 in the placebo group). Most characteristics were similar in both groups. Mean daily systolic and diastolic pressure was lower in the furosemide group (P<0.001) and there were fewer episodes of severe hypertension on the second (P=0.04) and fifth (P=0.04) days. In addition, shorter time was required until blood pressure was controlled (P=0.01) in the furosemide group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to placebo, 40 mg/day of oral furosemide in patients with preeclampsia in the postpartum period reduced mean daily systolic blood pressure in 1<sup>st</sup> and 5<sup>th</sup> days and mean daily diastolic blood pressure in 1<sup>st</sup>, 2<sup>nd</sup> and 5<sup>th</sup> days and the time required until blood pressure is controlled.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101614"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143053864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Novel machine learning applications in peripartum care: a scoping review
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101612
Shani Steinberg MD , Melissa Wong MD, MHDS , Eyal Zimlichman MD, MSc , Abraham Tsur MD, MBA
<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Machine learning (ML), a subtype of artificial intelligence (AI), presents predictive modeling and dynamic diagnostic tools to facilitate early interventions and improve decision-making. Considering the global challenges of maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality, ML holds the potential to enable significant improvements in maternal and neonatal health outcomes. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive review of ML applications in peripartum care, summarizing the potential of these tools to enhance clinical decision-making and identifying emerging trends and research gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>We conducted a scoping review on MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases from inception to April 2024. We gathered additional relevant studies through snowball sampling. We meticulously screened titles and abstracts and chose full-text articles for further analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Study Eligibility Criteria</h3><div>We included primary research articles and abstracts focusing on pregnant individuals, employing ML methods for peripartum care.</div></div><div><h3>Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods</h3><div>No formal quality assessment was performed. Data were extracted using a custom template to capture study characteristics and ML models. Findings were synthesized using summary tables and figures to highlight key trends and results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 406 studies, 78% were published within the last five years. Most studies originated from high-income or well-resourced countries, with 27% from North America (including 24% from the United States) and 34% from Asia, predominantly China (18%). Studies from low- and middle-income regions were notably scarce, reflecting significant regional disparities. Predictive modeling tasks were the most prevalent (59%), followed by classification tasks (29%). Supervised learning dominated (90%), with algorithms such as Support Vector Machines, Random Forests, and Logistic Regression most commonly used. Key topics included fetal distress and acidemia (32%), preterm birth (22%), mode of delivery (13%), and birth weight (13%). Notably, Explainable AI methods were utilized in only 19% of studies, and external validation was performed in just 5%. Despite these advancements, only 1% of models resulted in accessible clinical tools, and none were fully integrated into healthcare systems.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ML holds significant potential to enhance peripartum care by improving diagnostic accuracy and predictive capabilities. However, realizing this potential requires responsible AI practices, including robust validation with external datasets, prospective investigations across diverse populations, and the development of digital and data infrastructure for seamless integration into electronic health records. Additionally, transparent AI that provides insights into risk stratification logic is essential for clinician
{"title":"Novel machine learning applications in peripartum care: a scoping review","authors":"Shani Steinberg MD ,&nbsp;Melissa Wong MD, MHDS ,&nbsp;Eyal Zimlichman MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Abraham Tsur MD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101612","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101612","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Objective&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Machine learning (ML), a subtype of artificial intelligence (AI), presents predictive modeling and dynamic diagnostic tools to facilitate early interventions and improve decision-making. Considering the global challenges of maternal, fetal, and neonatal morbidity and mortality, ML holds the potential to enable significant improvements in maternal and neonatal health outcomes. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive review of ML applications in peripartum care, summarizing the potential of these tools to enhance clinical decision-making and identifying emerging trends and research gaps.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Data Sources&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We conducted a scoping review on MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases from inception to April 2024. We gathered additional relevant studies through snowball sampling. We meticulously screened titles and abstracts and chose full-text articles for further analysis.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Study Eligibility Criteria&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;We included primary research articles and abstracts focusing on pregnant individuals, employing ML methods for peripartum care.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;No formal quality assessment was performed. Data were extracted using a custom template to capture study characteristics and ML models. Findings were synthesized using summary tables and figures to highlight key trends and results.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Among 406 studies, 78% were published within the last five years. Most studies originated from high-income or well-resourced countries, with 27% from North America (including 24% from the United States) and 34% from Asia, predominantly China (18%). Studies from low- and middle-income regions were notably scarce, reflecting significant regional disparities. Predictive modeling tasks were the most prevalent (59%), followed by classification tasks (29%). Supervised learning dominated (90%), with algorithms such as Support Vector Machines, Random Forests, and Logistic Regression most commonly used. Key topics included fetal distress and acidemia (32%), preterm birth (22%), mode of delivery (13%), and birth weight (13%). Notably, Explainable AI methods were utilized in only 19% of studies, and external validation was performed in just 5%. Despite these advancements, only 1% of models resulted in accessible clinical tools, and none were fully integrated into healthcare systems.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusions&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;ML holds significant potential to enhance peripartum care by improving diagnostic accuracy and predictive capabilities. However, realizing this potential requires responsible AI practices, including robust validation with external datasets, prospective investigations across diverse populations, and the development of digital and data infrastructure for seamless integration into electronic health records. Additionally, transparent AI that provides insights into risk stratification logic is essential for clinician ","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 101612"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143042184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cochrane update: news and reviews from the Cochrane US network
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101611
Erin Plummer BS , Shayesteh Jahanfar PhD , Tiffany Duque MPH, RDN , Jeanne-Marie Guise MD, MPH, MBA , David M. Haas MD, MS
{"title":"Cochrane update: news and reviews from the Cochrane US network","authors":"Erin Plummer BS ,&nbsp;Shayesteh Jahanfar PhD ,&nbsp;Tiffany Duque MPH, RDN ,&nbsp;Jeanne-Marie Guise MD, MPH, MBA ,&nbsp;David M. Haas MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101611","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101611","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 101611"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143042182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Treatment for anxiety, depression, and stress in pregnant people experiencing antepartum hospitalization: a systematic review and meta-analysis
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101613
John R. Soehl MD , Kathryn Anthony MD , Adam K. Lewkowitz MD, MPHS , Lauren Fletcher MLIS, MA , L.G. Ward PhD , Emily S. Miller MD, MPH

Objective

To systematically evaluate inpatient interventions to reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression, or stress in pregnant individuals during antepartum hospitalization.

Data Sources

Searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and PsycINFO from database inception through April 2023.

Study eligibility criteria

Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were eligible for inclusion if an intervention was compared to treatment as usual (TAU) to reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression, or stress among pregnant individuals admitted to a hospital's antepartum unit.

Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods

Two authors independently screened all abstracts for eligibility and reviewed all potentially eligible full-text articles for inclusion. The primary outcome was the score on the assessment for symptoms of anxiety, depression, or stress after the intervention. The Hedges method was used to detect standardized mean difference (SMD) in studies using different psychometric scales, and weighted mean differences (WMD) were used in studies using the same psychometric scales. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

Results

Of 1185 articles originally identified, 19 full-text manuscripts were reviewed, and 3 studies (all randomized controlled studies)—corresponding to 226 patients randomized to an intervention and 263 patients randomized to TAU—were included. Compared to TAU, interventions significantly reduced mean scores on validated scales assessing symptoms of anxiety (SMD –0.65 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) –0.83, –0.46]), depression (WMD –0.52 [95% CI –0.76, –0.28]), and stress (WMD -0.57 [95% CI –0.82, –0.31]).

Conclusion

Though data are limited, interventions given to birthing people who experience antepartum hospitalization modestly—but significantly—reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress. These data highlight a need for further high-quality trials to support the mental health needs of this high-risk population.

Funding

This project was supported by the Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine at the Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University. AKL was supported by NICHD (K23HD103961). ESM was supported by NICHD (R01HD105499) and NINR (R01NR021126-01). LGW was supported by K23HD107296-01A1 and P20GM139767.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, CRD42023444189
{"title":"Treatment for anxiety, depression, and stress in pregnant people experiencing antepartum hospitalization: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"John R. Soehl MD ,&nbsp;Kathryn Anthony MD ,&nbsp;Adam K. Lewkowitz MD, MPHS ,&nbsp;Lauren Fletcher MLIS, MA ,&nbsp;L.G. Ward PhD ,&nbsp;Emily S. Miller MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101613","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101613","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To systematically evaluate inpatient interventions to reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression, or stress in pregnant individuals during antepartum hospitalization.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>Searches were conducted in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane CENTRAL, and PsycINFO from database inception through April 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Study eligibility criteria</h3><div>Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were eligible for inclusion if an intervention was compared to treatment as usual (TAU) to reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression, or stress among pregnant individuals admitted to a hospital's antepartum unit.</div></div><div><h3>Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods</h3><div>Two authors independently screened all abstracts for eligibility and reviewed all potentially eligible full-text articles for inclusion. The primary outcome was the score on the assessment for symptoms of anxiety, depression, or stress after the intervention. The Hedges method was used to detect standardized mean difference (SMD) in studies using different psychometric scales, and weighted mean differences (WMD) were used in studies using the same psychometric scales. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1185 articles originally identified, 19 full-text manuscripts were reviewed, and 3 studies (all randomized controlled studies)—corresponding to 226 patients randomized to an intervention and 263 patients randomized to TAU—were included. Compared to TAU, interventions significantly reduced mean scores on validated scales assessing symptoms of anxiety (SMD –0.65 [95% Confidence Interval (CI) –0.83, –0.46]), depression (WMD –0.52 [95% CI –0.76, –0.28]), and stress (WMD -0.57 [95% CI –0.82, –0.31]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Though data are limited, interventions given to birthing people who experience antepartum hospitalization modestly—but significantly—reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress. These data highlight a need for further high-quality trials to support the mental health needs of this high-risk population.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This project was supported by the Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine at the Alpert School of Medicine of Brown University. AKL was supported by NICHD (K23HD103961). ESM was supported by NICHD (R01HD105499) and NINR (R01NR021126-01). LGW was supported by K23HD107296-01A1 and P20GM139767.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic Review Registration</h3><div>PROSPERO, CRD42023444189</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 101613"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143042202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aspirin dosage for preeclampsia prophylaxis: an argument for 162-mg dosing.
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101620
Maura E Jones Pullins, Kim A Boggess

The optimal aspirin dose for preeclampsia prevention remains controversial, with international guidelines lacking consensus on the most effective regimen. Aspirin is a proven intervention for reducing the risk of preeclampsia, particularly when initiated early in pregnancy. Its benefits stem from the selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), reducing thromboxane A2 synthesis while preserving prostacyclin production, thereby restoring the vascular balance essential for placental health. A dose-response relationship has been established, with doses ≥100 mg showing significantly greater efficacy than lower doses. Furthermore, aspirin's pharmacological effects remain highly specific to COX-1 at the 162 mg dose, minimizing concerns about broader prostaglandin inhibition. Emerging evidence suggests that certain patient factors, such as altered pharmacokinetics during pregnancy or obesity, may reduce aspirin's effectiveness at lower doses (e.g., 81 mg). In these studies, aspirin resistance was successfully overcome with a 162 mg dose. While concerns regarding safety at this dose have been raised, contemporary randomized controlled trials utilizing a 150 mg dose have shown no increase in adverse effects compared to placebo. As such, current evidence increasingly supports 162 mg as the optimal dose for preeclampsia prevention, offering greater effectiveness than the commonly used 81 mg dose, without significant evidence of increased risk.

{"title":"Aspirin dosage for preeclampsia prophylaxis: an argument for 162-mg dosing.","authors":"Maura E Jones Pullins, Kim A Boggess","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101620","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal aspirin dose for preeclampsia prevention remains controversial, with international guidelines lacking consensus on the most effective regimen. Aspirin is a proven intervention for reducing the risk of preeclampsia, particularly when initiated early in pregnancy. Its benefits stem from the selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), reducing thromboxane A2 synthesis while preserving prostacyclin production, thereby restoring the vascular balance essential for placental health. A dose-response relationship has been established, with doses ≥100 mg showing significantly greater efficacy than lower doses. Furthermore, aspirin's pharmacological effects remain highly specific to COX-1 at the 162 mg dose, minimizing concerns about broader prostaglandin inhibition. Emerging evidence suggests that certain patient factors, such as altered pharmacokinetics during pregnancy or obesity, may reduce aspirin's effectiveness at lower doses (e.g., 81 mg). In these studies, aspirin resistance was successfully overcome with a 162 mg dose. While concerns regarding safety at this dose have been raised, contemporary randomized controlled trials utilizing a 150 mg dose have shown no increase in adverse effects compared to placebo. As such, current evidence increasingly supports 162 mg as the optimal dose for preeclampsia prevention, offering greater effectiveness than the commonly used 81 mg dose, without significant evidence of increased risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101620"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143399980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Author reply to the letter to the editor regarding "Effect of a perineal protection device in vacuum-assisted births - a prospective randomized controlled interventional trial".
IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101616
Nina Kimmich
{"title":"Author reply to the letter to the editor regarding \"Effect of a perineal protection device in vacuum-assisted births - a prospective randomized controlled interventional trial\".","authors":"Nina Kimmich","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101616","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101616","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101616"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143029980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1