首页 > 最新文献

JMIR Medical Education最新文献

英文 中文
Voices of Innovation: Reflective Report on Integrating Artificial Intelligence-Simulated Mental Health Patient Scenarios Into Undergraduate Nursing Education in the United Arab Emirates. 创新之声:阿拉伯联合酋长国将人工智能模拟的精神健康患者场景融入本科护理教育的反思报告。
IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2026-03-12 DOI: 10.2196/78161
Amina Ahmad, Janisha Kavumpurath, Raheesa Kader, Muna Altamimi, Monia El Hajj, Fatma Refaat Ahmed Ahmed, Muhammad Arsyad Subu, Taliaa Yafei, Hind Rashed Ali, Idil Saleh, Nabeel Al-Yateem

Unlabelled: Limited clinical placements for mental health courses in the United Arab Emirates have made it difficult to provide consistent experiential learning for undergraduate nursing students. As a result, nurse educators are considering technology-enabled learning approaches to deliver clinical skills training. This Viewpoint presents a reflective, theory-informed account of the first-year integration of an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled, voice-interactive simulated patient into an undergraduate mental health nursing practicum. Grounded in Kolb's experiential learning cycle and aligned with established simulation best practices, the initiative was designed to support therapeutic communication, psychiatric assessment, and clinical reasoning through structured prebriefing, immersive interaction, and guided debriefing. The paper describes the educational rationale, scenario development, implementation processes, and contextual challenges encountered during real-world deployment across university and clinical environments. AI-supported simulations offered a standardized and psychologically safe context for students to engage with complex psychiatric scenarios, particularly when direct patient interaction is constrained. We discuss operational insights related to technical reliability, environmental requirements, faculty preparation, and assessment integration alongside considerations for scalability and sustainability in resource-limited settings. While AI-supported objective structured clinical examinations have been incorporated to support assessment consistency, formal psychometric validation and outcome comparisons have not been undertaken at this stage. By sharing lessons learned from early implementation, this Viewpoint contributes practical insights for nursing educators facing similar structural constraints. AI-enabled simulation is presented as a strategic complement to, rather than a replacement for, traditional clinical placements, with future empirical research needed to evaluate educational outcomes and long-term impact.

未标明:在阿拉伯联合酋长国,心理健康课程的临床实习名额有限,因此很难向本科护理学生提供一致的体验式学习。因此,护士教育工作者正在考虑采用技术支持的学习方法来提供临床技能培训。这一观点提出了一个反思性的,有理论依据的账户,第一年将人工智能(AI)启用,语音交互模拟病人融入本科心理健康护理实习。该计划以Kolb的体验式学习周期为基础,并与已建立的模拟最佳实践相结合,旨在通过结构化的预简报、沉浸式互动和指导汇报来支持治疗沟通、精神病学评估和临床推理。本文描述了教育原理、场景开发、实施过程以及在大学和临床环境中实际部署过程中遇到的背景挑战。人工智能支持的模拟为学生参与复杂的精神病学场景提供了标准化和心理安全的环境,特别是在直接与患者互动受到限制的情况下。我们将讨论与技术可靠性、环境要求、教师准备和评估整合相关的操作见解,以及在资源有限的情况下考虑可扩展性和可持续性。虽然人工智能支持的客观结构化临床检查已被纳入以支持评估一致性,但在此阶段尚未进行正式的心理测量验证和结果比较。通过分享早期实施的经验教训,这一观点为面临类似结构限制的护理教育工作者提供了实用的见解。人工智能模拟是对传统临床实习的战略补充,而不是替代,未来的实证研究需要评估教育成果和长期影响。
{"title":"Voices of Innovation: Reflective Report on Integrating Artificial Intelligence-Simulated Mental Health Patient Scenarios Into Undergraduate Nursing Education in the United Arab Emirates.","authors":"Amina Ahmad, Janisha Kavumpurath, Raheesa Kader, Muna Altamimi, Monia El Hajj, Fatma Refaat Ahmed Ahmed, Muhammad Arsyad Subu, Taliaa Yafei, Hind Rashed Ali, Idil Saleh, Nabeel Al-Yateem","doi":"10.2196/78161","DOIUrl":"10.2196/78161","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Limited clinical placements for mental health courses in the United Arab Emirates have made it difficult to provide consistent experiential learning for undergraduate nursing students. As a result, nurse educators are considering technology-enabled learning approaches to deliver clinical skills training. This Viewpoint presents a reflective, theory-informed account of the first-year integration of an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled, voice-interactive simulated patient into an undergraduate mental health nursing practicum. Grounded in Kolb's experiential learning cycle and aligned with established simulation best practices, the initiative was designed to support therapeutic communication, psychiatric assessment, and clinical reasoning through structured prebriefing, immersive interaction, and guided debriefing. The paper describes the educational rationale, scenario development, implementation processes, and contextual challenges encountered during real-world deployment across university and clinical environments. AI-supported simulations offered a standardized and psychologically safe context for students to engage with complex psychiatric scenarios, particularly when direct patient interaction is constrained. We discuss operational insights related to technical reliability, environmental requirements, faculty preparation, and assessment integration alongside considerations for scalability and sustainability in resource-limited settings. While AI-supported objective structured clinical examinations have been incorporated to support assessment consistency, formal psychometric validation and outcome comparisons have not been undertaken at this stage. By sharing lessons learned from early implementation, this Viewpoint contributes practical insights for nursing educators facing similar structural constraints. AI-enabled simulation is presented as a strategic complement to, rather than a replacement for, traditional clinical placements, with future empirical research needed to evaluate educational outcomes and long-term impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"12 ","pages":"e78161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12981539/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147445444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding Clinicians' Informational Needs for AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems: Qualitative Interview Study. 了解临床医生对人工智能驱动的临床决策支持系统的信息需求:定性访谈研究。
IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2026-03-12 DOI: 10.2196/85228
Simone Mingels, Hannah Piehl, Madeline Therrien, Ekaterina Akhmad, Anniek van Hienen, Johan van Soest, Laura Hochstenbach, Andre Dekker, Olga Damman, Rianne Fijten
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are transforming health care, particularly through AI-driven clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSS) that aid in predicting disease progression and personalizing treatment. Despite their potential, adoption remains limited due to clinician concerns about algorithm misuse, misinterpretation, and lack of transparency.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This qualitative study explores the informational needs and preferences of clinicians to better understand and appropriately use AI-CDSS in decision-making. In parallel, this study explores AI experts' perspectives on what information should be communicated to enable safe and appropriate use of AI-CDSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative description design study was conducted using semistructured interviews with 16 participants (8 clinicians and 8 AI experts). Discussions focused on experiences with AI, informational needs, and feedback on existing reporting standards, including Model Cards, Model Facts, and the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis-Artificial Intelligence (TRIPOD-AI) checklist. The transcripts were analyzed through codebook thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four key themes were identified: (1) clinicians need clear information on training data, its origin, size, and inclusion and exclusion criteria, to judge model applicability; (2) performance metrics must go beyond the area under the curve (AUC) and be clinically relevant to support informed decisions; (3) limitations and warnings about inappropriate use should be specific and clearly communicated to prevent misuse; and (4) information should be presented in layered, customizable formats within existing clinical software, avoiding unnecessary jargon, and allowing optional deeper explanations. While each of the reviewed reporting standards offered strengths, none were considered sufficient alone. Participants recommended a combined and clinician-centered approach to information delivery. Alignment of reporting standards with clinical workflows and decision thresholds was thought to be crucial to bridge the usability gap.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To improve AI-CDSS adoption in clinical practice, reporting standards must be designed for better clinician comprehension and usability. Enhancing transparency, particularly regarding training data and performance, can likely help clinicians assess AI-CDSS more effectively. Information should be delivered in an accessible, layered format, fitting clinical workflows. Co-creation with clinicians throughout AI-CDSS development was a cross-cutting theme, highlighting its importance in ensuring tools are not only technically sound but also practically usable. Future research should explore how to structurally report on performance and validation metrics for clinician understanding and assess the impact of information prov
背景:人工智能(AI)的进步正在改变医疗保健,特别是通过人工智能驱动的临床决策支持系统(AI- cdss),有助于预测疾病进展和个性化治疗。尽管有潜力,但由于临床医生对算法滥用、误解和缺乏透明度的担忧,采用仍然有限。目的:本定性研究探讨临床医生在决策过程中对AI-CDSS的信息需求和偏好,以更好地理解和恰当地使用AI-CDSS。与此同时,本研究探讨了人工智能专家对应传达哪些信息以实现安全和适当使用AI- cdss的观点。方法:采用半结构化访谈法对16名参与者(8名临床医生和8名人工智能专家)进行定性描述设计研究。讨论的重点是人工智能的经验、信息需求和对现有报告标准的反馈,包括模型卡、模型事实和个人预后或诊断的多变量预测模型的透明报告-人工智能(TRIPOD-AI)清单。通过密码本主题分析对转录本进行分析。结果:确定了四个关键主题:(1)临床医生需要明确的培训数据信息、来源、规模、纳入和排除标准,以判断模型的适用性;(2)绩效指标必须超越曲线下面积(AUC),并与临床相关,以支持明智的决策;(3)对不适当使用的限制和警告应具体、清楚地传达,以防止滥用;(4)信息应在现有临床软件中以分层、可定制的格式呈现,避免不必要的术语,并允许可选的更深入的解释。虽然每一项审查的报告标准都有其优点,但没有一项被认为是单独充分的。与会者建议采用以临床医生为中心的综合信息传递方法。报告标准与临床工作流程和决策阈值的一致性被认为是弥合可用性差距的关键。结论:为了提高AI-CDSS在临床实践中的应用,报告标准的设计必须使临床医生更好地理解和可用性。提高透明度,特别是培训数据和绩效方面的透明度,可能有助于临床医生更有效地评估AI-CDSS。信息应以可访问的分层格式提供,适合临床工作流程。在整个AI-CDSS开发过程中与临床医生共同创造是一个跨领域的主题,强调了其在确保工具不仅在技术上合理而且在实践中可用方面的重要性。未来的研究应该探索如何结构化地报告临床医生理解的性能和验证指标,并评估信息提供对采用AI-CDSS的影响。
{"title":"Understanding Clinicians' Informational Needs for AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems: Qualitative Interview Study.","authors":"Simone Mingels, Hannah Piehl, Madeline Therrien, Ekaterina Akhmad, Anniek van Hienen, Johan van Soest, Laura Hochstenbach, Andre Dekker, Olga Damman, Rianne Fijten","doi":"10.2196/85228","DOIUrl":"10.2196/85228","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are transforming health care, particularly through AI-driven clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSS) that aid in predicting disease progression and personalizing treatment. Despite their potential, adoption remains limited due to clinician concerns about algorithm misuse, misinterpretation, and lack of transparency.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This qualitative study explores the informational needs and preferences of clinicians to better understand and appropriately use AI-CDSS in decision-making. In parallel, this study explores AI experts' perspectives on what information should be communicated to enable safe and appropriate use of AI-CDSS.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A qualitative description design study was conducted using semistructured interviews with 16 participants (8 clinicians and 8 AI experts). Discussions focused on experiences with AI, informational needs, and feedback on existing reporting standards, including Model Cards, Model Facts, and the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis-Artificial Intelligence (TRIPOD-AI) checklist. The transcripts were analyzed through codebook thematic analysis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Four key themes were identified: (1) clinicians need clear information on training data, its origin, size, and inclusion and exclusion criteria, to judge model applicability; (2) performance metrics must go beyond the area under the curve (AUC) and be clinically relevant to support informed decisions; (3) limitations and warnings about inappropriate use should be specific and clearly communicated to prevent misuse; and (4) information should be presented in layered, customizable formats within existing clinical software, avoiding unnecessary jargon, and allowing optional deeper explanations. While each of the reviewed reporting standards offered strengths, none were considered sufficient alone. Participants recommended a combined and clinician-centered approach to information delivery. Alignment of reporting standards with clinical workflows and decision thresholds was thought to be crucial to bridge the usability gap.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;To improve AI-CDSS adoption in clinical practice, reporting standards must be designed for better clinician comprehension and usability. Enhancing transparency, particularly regarding training data and performance, can likely help clinicians assess AI-CDSS more effectively. Information should be delivered in an accessible, layered format, fitting clinical workflows. Co-creation with clinicians throughout AI-CDSS development was a cross-cutting theme, highlighting its importance in ensuring tools are not only technically sound but also practically usable. Future research should explore how to structurally report on performance and validation metrics for clinician understanding and assess the impact of information prov","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"12 ","pages":"e85228"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12989292/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147463727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating Microlearning for Faculty Development in Medical Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study. 评价微学习对医学教育教师发展的影响:一项混合方法试点。
IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2026-03-11 DOI: 10.2196/87980
Darci L Lammers, Jeffrey B Geske, Jane A Linderbaum, Michael W Cullen

This mixed methods pilot study evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of microlearning for faculty development in cardiovascular education. Microlearning appears feasible and well-received for faculty development, offering a scalable, flexible approach.

非结构化:微学习为传统的教师发展项目提供了一种灵活的、异步的替代方案,传统的教师发展项目通常需要时间密集的面对面会议,并且限制了临床教育者的参与。这项混合方法的试点研究评估了微学习对心血管教育教师发展的可行性和有效性。八位教职员工在四个月的时间间隔内完成了前后测试、满意度调查和访谈。中位得分从366.07提高到400.00,具有中等效应大小(秩双列相关= 0.52),但结果无统计学意义(P = 0.25)。满意度很高,定性主题强调灵活性、清晰度和感知价值,而时间限制仍然是一个障碍。微学习似乎是可行的,并且对教师的发展很受欢迎,提供了一种可扩展的、灵活的方法。需要更大规模的对照组研究和长期随访来评估长期影响。
{"title":"Evaluating Microlearning for Faculty Development in Medical Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.","authors":"Darci L Lammers, Jeffrey B Geske, Jane A Linderbaum, Michael W Cullen","doi":"10.2196/87980","DOIUrl":"10.2196/87980","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This mixed methods pilot study evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of microlearning for faculty development in cardiovascular education. Microlearning appears feasible and well-received for faculty development, offering a scalable, flexible approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":"e87980"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146228960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Targeted Educational Intervention Through Game-Based Learning to Promote Rational Antimicrobial Use Among Health Care Learners: Prospective Interventional Study. 有针对性的教育干预,通过游戏为基础的学习,促进卫生保健学习者抗菌药物的合理使用:前瞻性干预研究。
IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2026-03-10 DOI: 10.2196/72236
Sumana Mn, Supreeta R Shettar, Yogeesh D Maheshwarappa, G K Megha, Veerabhadra Swamy Gs, Chinchana Shylaja Eshwar, Shruthi Shree Sc

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global problem. Training health care professionals in the rational use of antimicrobials is essential to curb AMR.

Objective: To support efforts to reduce antibiotic resistance, this study assesses how well a gamified educational intervention might improve health care professionals' and students' understanding and use of appropriate antibiotics.

Methods: This is a prospective interventional study conducted for clinical practitioners, undergraduates (MBBS and interns), postgraduates, and pharmacy students. A total of 60 participants were included in the study. Innovative games were administered to support the management of infections across multiple body systems, in accordance with the 2022 Indian Council of Medical Research treatment guidelines and the latest Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines, incorporating multiple instructional components. Pretest and posttest questionnaires were administered and evaluated.

Results: After the intervention, participants' ability to differentiate between bacterial and viral symptoms in respiratory tract infections and gastroenteritis improved from 48% to 94%. The practice of selecting the appropriate empirical antimicrobial at the correct dose, route, and duration also demonstrated significant improvement, reflecting enhanced adherence to principles of rational antimicrobial use.

Conclusions: The gamified intervention successfully improved participants' knowledge and awareness of rational antimicrobial use. Substantial improvements across all the assessed components highlight the positive impact of the intervention in promoting optimal antimicrobial use and curbing AMR. Innovative gamified interventions may foster better and longer-lasting awareness, supporting appropriate antimicrobial use.

背景:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是一个全球性问题。培训卫生保健专业人员合理使用抗微生物药物对于遏制抗生素耐药性至关重要。目的:为了支持减少抗生素耐药性的努力,本研究评估了游戏化教育干预在提高卫生保健专业人员和学生对适当抗生素的理解和使用方面的作用。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性介入研究,对象为临床从业人员、本科生(MBBS和实习生)、研究生和药学专业学生。共有60名参与者参与了这项研究。根据2022年印度医学研究委员会治疗指南和最新的美国传染病学会指南,管理创新游戏,以支持跨多个身体系统的感染管理,其中包含多个教学组件。对测试前和测试后的问卷进行了管理和评估。结果:干预后,参与者区分呼吸道感染和肠胃炎细菌和病毒症状的能力从48%提高到94%。在正确剂量、途径和持续时间选择合适的经验性抗菌药物的做法也显示出显著的改善,反映了对抗菌药物合理使用原则的加强遵守。结论:游戏化干预成功地提高了参与者合理使用抗菌药物的知识和意识。所有评估组成部分的实质性改善突出了干预措施在促进最佳抗菌药物使用和遏制抗生素耐药性方面的积极影响。创新的游戏化干预措施可以培养更好和更持久的意识,支持适当使用抗微生物药物。
{"title":"Targeted Educational Intervention Through Game-Based Learning to Promote Rational Antimicrobial Use Among Health Care Learners: Prospective Interventional Study.","authors":"Sumana Mn, Supreeta R Shettar, Yogeesh D Maheshwarappa, G K Megha, Veerabhadra Swamy Gs, Chinchana Shylaja Eshwar, Shruthi Shree Sc","doi":"10.2196/72236","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/72236","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global problem. Training health care professionals in the rational use of antimicrobials is essential to curb AMR.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To support efforts to reduce antibiotic resistance, this study assesses how well a gamified educational intervention might improve health care professionals' and students' understanding and use of appropriate antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective interventional study conducted for clinical practitioners, undergraduates (MBBS and interns), postgraduates, and pharmacy students. A total of 60 participants were included in the study. Innovative games were administered to support the management of infections across multiple body systems, in accordance with the 2022 Indian Council of Medical Research treatment guidelines and the latest Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines, incorporating multiple instructional components. Pretest and posttest questionnaires were administered and evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the intervention, participants' ability to differentiate between bacterial and viral symptoms in respiratory tract infections and gastroenteritis improved from 48% to 94%. The practice of selecting the appropriate empirical antimicrobial at the correct dose, route, and duration also demonstrated significant improvement, reflecting enhanced adherence to principles of rational antimicrobial use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The gamified intervention successfully improved participants' knowledge and awareness of rational antimicrobial use. Substantial improvements across all the assessed components highlight the positive impact of the intervention in promoting optimal antimicrobial use and curbing AMR. Innovative gamified interventions may foster better and longer-lasting awareness, supporting appropriate antimicrobial use.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"12 ","pages":"e72236"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12974994/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147436326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceptions and Attitudes of Medical Students Toward the Integration of Large Language Models in Medical Education: Cross-Sectional Survey in China. 医学生对医学教育中大型语言模式整合的认知和态度:中国横断面调查。
IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2026-03-09 DOI: 10.2196/66381
Cheng Zhao, Weiqian Yan, Long Wang, Jing Wu, Herve Pasteur Ndikuriyo, Renhe Yu

Background: Although artificial intelligence (AI) is being rapidly integrated into medical education, insights from medical students, particularly in the Chinese context, remain limited.

Objective: This study was designed to explore Chinese medical students' perceptions of and attitudes toward the integration of AI into medical education, as well as the factors that may influence their perspectives. The findings of this research offer valuable insights to assist medical educators in the effective implementation of these innovative educational approaches.

Methods: On the basis of the estimated total number of clinical medical students at the target institutions, the sample size was calculated to be 379. A web-based questionnaire survey was designed to investigate the acceptance level of medical students toward the application of AI. The questionnaire consisted of 14 questions across 4 dimensions, which included demographic characteristics, perceptions of AI application, willingness, and concerns. Each dimension contained 3 to 4 questions. Descriptive statistics were used to tabulate the frequency of each variable. Chi-square tests and multiple regression analyses were conducted to measure the influencing factors.

Results: A total of 566 cross-sectional online surveys were distributed from December 2023 to January 2024 through a snowball sampling method. Finally, 490 medical students from various local tertiary medical centers were involved. Overall, a majority of the participants showed a positive attitude toward future learning and the usage of AI, manifested as totally willing to acquire relevant knowledge (222/490, 45.3%), totally willing to use AI tools (230/490, 46.9%), and totally desiring that schools would offer AI-related courses (230/490, 46.9%). However, there is still a large proportion (392/490, 80.0%) of participants who expressed concerns regarding ethical issues. The findings also indicated that gender and educational level were significantly correlated with the AI application. Specifically, regression analysis indicated that male participants were more inclined to acquire AI information through social media (odds ratio 0.458, 95% CI 0.33-0.67; P<.001) and that male or graduate-level participants were more likely to use AI for academic writing purposes (odds ratio 0.476, 95% CI 0.38-0.82; P=.001 for male; odds ratio 1.552, 95% CI 1.32-1.77; P=.009 for graduate students, respectively).

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that a general awareness of AI's role in medical education is evident among students. However, subgroup-specific differences must be taken into account, particularly when designing and optimizing educational strategies integrated with AI. This consideration is critical to ensuring that such tools align with the diverse learning needs of distinct student groups.

背景:尽管人工智能(AI)正在迅速融入医学教育,但医学生的见解,特别是在中国背景下,仍然有限。目的:本研究旨在探讨中国医学生对人工智能融入医学教育的认知和态度,以及可能影响其观点的因素。本研究的发现提供了宝贵的见解,以协助医学教育工作者有效地实施这些创新的教育方法。方法:根据目标院校临床医学生总人数估算,计算样本量为379人。采用基于网络的问卷调查方法,调查医学生对人工智能应用的接受程度。该问卷由4个维度的14个问题组成,包括人口特征、对人工智能应用的看法、意愿和担忧。每个维度包含3到4个问题。描述性统计用于将每个变量的频率制成表格。采用卡方检验和多元回归分析测定影响因素。结果:从2023年12月至2024年1月,采用滚雪球抽样法,共发放了566份横断面在线调查。最后,来自各地方三级医疗中心的490名医学生参与了研究。总体而言,大多数参与者对未来学习和使用人工智能持积极态度,表现为非常愿意获取相关知识(222/490,45.3%),非常愿意使用人工智能工具(230/490,46.9%),非常希望学校开设人工智能相关课程(230/490,46.9%)。然而,仍然有很大比例(392/490,80.0%)的参与者表达了对伦理问题的担忧。研究结果还表明,性别和教育水平与人工智能应用显著相关。具体而言,回归分析显示,男性参与者更倾向于通过社交媒体获取人工智能信息(优势比0.458,95% CI 0.33-0.67);结论:我们的研究结果表明,学生普遍意识到人工智能在医学教育中的作用。然而,必须考虑到特定群体的差异,特别是在设计和优化与人工智能相结合的教育策略时。这一考虑对于确保这些工具与不同学生群体的不同学习需求保持一致至关重要。
{"title":"Perceptions and Attitudes of Medical Students Toward the Integration of Large Language Models in Medical Education: Cross-Sectional Survey in China.","authors":"Cheng Zhao, Weiqian Yan, Long Wang, Jing Wu, Herve Pasteur Ndikuriyo, Renhe Yu","doi":"10.2196/66381","DOIUrl":"10.2196/66381","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although artificial intelligence (AI) is being rapidly integrated into medical education, insights from medical students, particularly in the Chinese context, remain limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was designed to explore Chinese medical students' perceptions of and attitudes toward the integration of AI into medical education, as well as the factors that may influence their perspectives. The findings of this research offer valuable insights to assist medical educators in the effective implementation of these innovative educational approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On the basis of the estimated total number of clinical medical students at the target institutions, the sample size was calculated to be 379. A web-based questionnaire survey was designed to investigate the acceptance level of medical students toward the application of AI. The questionnaire consisted of 14 questions across 4 dimensions, which included demographic characteristics, perceptions of AI application, willingness, and concerns. Each dimension contained 3 to 4 questions. Descriptive statistics were used to tabulate the frequency of each variable. Chi-square tests and multiple regression analyses were conducted to measure the influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 566 cross-sectional online surveys were distributed from December 2023 to January 2024 through a snowball sampling method. Finally, 490 medical students from various local tertiary medical centers were involved. Overall, a majority of the participants showed a positive attitude toward future learning and the usage of AI, manifested as totally willing to acquire relevant knowledge (222/490, 45.3%), totally willing to use AI tools (230/490, 46.9%), and totally desiring that schools would offer AI-related courses (230/490, 46.9%). However, there is still a large proportion (392/490, 80.0%) of participants who expressed concerns regarding ethical issues. The findings also indicated that gender and educational level were significantly correlated with the AI application. Specifically, regression analysis indicated that male participants were more inclined to acquire AI information through social media (odds ratio 0.458, 95% CI 0.33-0.67; P<.001) and that male or graduate-level participants were more likely to use AI for academic writing purposes (odds ratio 0.476, 95% CI 0.38-0.82; P=.001 for male; odds ratio 1.552, 95% CI 1.32-1.77; P=.009 for graduate students, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that a general awareness of AI's role in medical education is evident among students. However, subgroup-specific differences must be taken into account, particularly when designing and optimizing educational strategies integrated with AI. This consideration is critical to ensuring that such tools align with the diverse learning needs of distinct student groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"12 ","pages":"e66381"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12978898/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147436295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of a Deep Learning-Based Feedback Model to Assist Medical Students Learning Renal Ultrasound Acquisition: Mixed Methods Study. 基于深度学习的反馈模型的发展,以帮助医学生学习肾脏超声采集:混合方法研究。
IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2026-03-09 DOI: 10.2196/72110
Andy Cheuk Nam Hwang, Rahul Singh, Elizabeth Ann Barrett, Peng Cao, Varut Vardhanabhuti, Pauline Yeung Ng, Gordon Tin Chun Wong, Michael Tiong Hong Co, Elaine Yuen-Phin Lee

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound training is being increasingly integrated into undergraduate medical education, leading to a substantial demand for trained faculty to provide instruction and feedback.

Objective: This study aimed to develop an adjunct tool, a deep learning-based feedback model, to facilitate student learning.

Methods: Renal ultrasound images (N=2807) were used to train a cascaded deep learning-based feedback model that classified images into three categories: optimal, suboptimal, and incorrect. Suboptimal images were further subcategorized as images with artifact, incorrect gain, and/or incorrect positioning. The model was deployed among year 5 medical students receiving bedside ultrasound training, who were invited to upload renal ultrasound images to an online platform for automated image quality grading and feedback. A mixed methods analysis was used to evaluate students' learning experience. Focus group interviews were organized to qualitatively analyze the successes and challenges of implementation. Quantitative analysis was based on responses to a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire and performance on the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Objective structured clinical examination scores were compared with mean OSCE scores from the 2 years preceding implementation of the deep learning-based feedback model.

Results: Focus group interviews identified that the deep learning-based feedback model encouraged self-regulated learning but also recognized that discordant curricular design and hardware limitations impeded its use. The 11-item online questionnaire had a response rate of 42.4% (98/231 students). Among respondents, 32% (31/98) to 48% (47/98) found the model helpful in assisting ultrasound training (Likert score of 4-5 for items 1-3), while 49% (48/98) to 76% (74/98) were satisfied with its usability and their interaction with the model (Likert score of 4-5 for items 4-11). The mean OSCE score was 9.73 (SD 0.76) out of 10, compared with mean scores of 9.35 (SD 1.03; P=.06) and 9.45 (SD 0.97; P=.15) out of 10 in the 2 individual years preceding implementation of the model.

Conclusions: A cascaded deep learning-based feedback model was developed and deployed among year 5 medical students receiving bedside ultrasound training, with positive learner responses and enhanced self-regulated learning. The innovation was associated with increased student engagement and improved ultrasound skill acquisition among novice learners.

背景:护理点超声培训越来越多地融入本科医学教育,导致对训练有素的教师提供指导和反馈的大量需求。目的:本研究旨在开发一个辅助工具,即基于深度学习的反馈模型,以促进学生的学习。方法:使用肾脏超声图像(N=2807)训练一个基于级联深度学习的反馈模型,该模型将图像分为最优、次优和不正确三类。次优图像进一步细分为具有伪影、不正确增益和/或不正确定位的图像。该模型被部署在接受床边超声训练的五年级医学生中,他们被邀请将肾脏超声图像上传到一个在线平台,用于自动图像质量分级和反馈。采用混合方法分析学生的学习体验。组织了焦点小组访谈,以定性地分析实施的成功和挑战。定量分析基于5分李克特量表问卷的回答和客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)的表现。目的:将结构化临床检查分数与基于深度学习的反馈模型实施前2年的平均OSCE分数进行比较。结果:焦点小组访谈发现,基于深度学习的反馈模型鼓励自我调节学习,但也认识到不协调的课程设计和硬件限制阻碍了它的使用。在线问卷共11项,回复率为42.4%(98/231)。在受访者中,32%(31/98)至48%(47/98)的人认为该模型有助于辅助超声训练(1-3项的李克特得分为4-5),而49%(48/98)至76%(74/98)的人对其可用性和与模型的互动感到满意(4-11项的李克特得分为4-5)。平均OSCE评分为9.73 (SD 0.76),而在实施该模型之前的2年,平均OSCE评分为9.35 (SD 1.03; P=.06)和9.45 (SD 0.97; P=.15)。结论:建立了基于级联深度学习的反馈模型,并在接受床边超声训练的五年级医学生中应用,学习者反应积极,自我调节学习增强。创新与增加学生的参与和提高超声技能习得的新手学习者。
{"title":"Development of a Deep Learning-Based Feedback Model to Assist Medical Students Learning Renal Ultrasound Acquisition: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Andy Cheuk Nam Hwang, Rahul Singh, Elizabeth Ann Barrett, Peng Cao, Varut Vardhanabhuti, Pauline Yeung Ng, Gordon Tin Chun Wong, Michael Tiong Hong Co, Elaine Yuen-Phin Lee","doi":"10.2196/72110","DOIUrl":"10.2196/72110","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound training is being increasingly integrated into undergraduate medical education, leading to a substantial demand for trained faculty to provide instruction and feedback.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop an adjunct tool, a deep learning-based feedback model, to facilitate student learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Renal ultrasound images (N=2807) were used to train a cascaded deep learning-based feedback model that classified images into three categories: optimal, suboptimal, and incorrect. Suboptimal images were further subcategorized as images with artifact, incorrect gain, and/or incorrect positioning. The model was deployed among year 5 medical students receiving bedside ultrasound training, who were invited to upload renal ultrasound images to an online platform for automated image quality grading and feedback. A mixed methods analysis was used to evaluate students' learning experience. Focus group interviews were organized to qualitatively analyze the successes and challenges of implementation. Quantitative analysis was based on responses to a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire and performance on the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Objective structured clinical examination scores were compared with mean OSCE scores from the 2 years preceding implementation of the deep learning-based feedback model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Focus group interviews identified that the deep learning-based feedback model encouraged self-regulated learning but also recognized that discordant curricular design and hardware limitations impeded its use. The 11-item online questionnaire had a response rate of 42.4% (98/231 students). Among respondents, 32% (31/98) to 48% (47/98) found the model helpful in assisting ultrasound training (Likert score of 4-5 for items 1-3), while 49% (48/98) to 76% (74/98) were satisfied with its usability and their interaction with the model (Likert score of 4-5 for items 4-11). The mean OSCE score was 9.73 (SD 0.76) out of 10, compared with mean scores of 9.35 (SD 1.03; P=.06) and 9.45 (SD 0.97; P=.15) out of 10 in the 2 individual years preceding implementation of the model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A cascaded deep learning-based feedback model was developed and deployed among year 5 medical students receiving bedside ultrasound training, with positive learner responses and enhanced self-regulated learning. The innovation was associated with increased student engagement and improved ultrasound skill acquisition among novice learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"12 ","pages":"e72110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12978925/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147436254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An AI-Driven Virtual Patient Platform (CBT Trainer) for Training Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Practitioners Against Competencies: Mixed Methods Pilot Study. 一种人工智能驱动的虚拟患者平台(CBT Trainer),用于训练认知行为治疗从业者对抗能力:混合方法试点研究。
IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2026-03-06 DOI: 10.2196/84091
Tianyu Terry Zhang, Rob Saunders, Stephen Pilling, Ciarán O'Driscoll

Background: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) training faces significant challenges, including supervised practice with diverse cases, inconsistent feedback, resource-intensive supervision, and difficulties standardizing competence assessment.

Objective: This study evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of CBT Trainer (TTZ), the first virtual patient platform to provide real-time feedback aligned with established competence frameworks. The mobile app trains psychological practitioners using standardized artificial intelligence patient interactions and the evaluation of therapist responses against competence frameworks to enable structured skill development in a controlled, repeatable environment that complements traditional training methods.

Methods: This mixed methods pilot study used a 2-stage approach. Stage 1 involved usability testing with 4 participants. Stage 2 included 59 participants from psychological practitioner training programs (a Low Intensity CBT Interventions Program and a Doctorate in Clinical Psychology) who engaged with the CBT Trainer voluntarily for over 1 month. Measures of impact included the System Usability Scale (SUS), platform naturalistic engagement, poststudy questionnaire on perceived competency development, comparative evaluation against traditional role-play, and qualitative feedback.

Results: Participants engaged voluntarily with the platform for an average of 95.24 (SD 134.58; median 45.34, IQR 11.57-105.15) minutes of active role-play. Platform usability was rated as excellent (mean SUS 82.20, SD 12.93). Self-reported competence improvement improved most in assessment skills (96.7%) and information gathering (66.7%). When compared to traditional peer role-play exercises, participants rated CBT Trainer moderately favorably (mean 5.90/10, SD 1.94). Qualitative feedback highlighted strengths in competency-aligned feedback, on-demand accessibility, and a psychologically safe practice space.

Conclusions: This pilot study provides evidence that an artificial intelligence-based patient simulation shows promise as a supplementary training tool for psychological therapists who use CBT in their practice, particularly regarding accessibility and immediate feedback. Future research should use randomized controlled designs with objective competence assessments.

背景:认知行为治疗(Cognitive behavioural therapy, CBT)培训面临着诸多挑战,包括监督实践案例多样、反馈不一致、监督资源密集、能力评估难以标准化等。目的:本研究评估CBT Trainer (TTZ)的可接受性和可行性,TTZ是第一个提供与已建立的能力框架一致的实时反馈的虚拟患者平台。该移动应用程序使用标准化的人工智能患者互动和治疗师对能力框架的反应评估来培训心理医生,从而在受控的、可重复的环境中实现结构化的技能发展,补充传统的培训方法。方法:这项混合方法的先导研究采用两阶段方法。第一阶段包括4名参与者的可用性测试。第二阶段包括来自心理从业者培训项目(低强度CBT干预项目和临床心理学博士)的59名参与者,他们自愿与CBT培训师进行了一个多月的培训。影响的测量包括系统可用性量表(SUS)、平台自然参与、关于感知能力发展的研究后问卷、与传统角色扮演的比较评估,以及定性反馈。结果:参与者自愿参与平台的主动角色扮演平均为95.24分钟(SD 134.58;中位数45.34,IQR 11.57-105.15)。平台可用性被评为优秀(平均SUS 82.20, SD 12.93)。自我报告能力改善在评估技能(96.7%)和信息收集(66.7%)方面改善最大。与传统的同伴角色扮演练习相比,参与者对CBT Trainer的评价较好(平均5.90/10,标准差1.94)。定性反馈强调了与能力一致的反馈、随需应变的可访问性和心理上安全的实践空间的优势。结论:这项初步研究提供了证据,表明基于人工智能的患者模拟有望成为在实践中使用CBT的心理治疗师的补充培训工具,特别是在可及性和即时反馈方面。未来的研究应采用随机对照设计和客观能力评估。
{"title":"An AI-Driven Virtual Patient Platform (CBT Trainer) for Training Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Practitioners Against Competencies: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.","authors":"Tianyu Terry Zhang, Rob Saunders, Stephen Pilling, Ciarán O'Driscoll","doi":"10.2196/84091","DOIUrl":"10.2196/84091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) training faces significant challenges, including supervised practice with diverse cases, inconsistent feedback, resource-intensive supervision, and difficulties standardizing competence assessment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of CBT Trainer (TTZ), the first virtual patient platform to provide real-time feedback aligned with established competence frameworks. The mobile app trains psychological practitioners using standardized artificial intelligence patient interactions and the evaluation of therapist responses against competence frameworks to enable structured skill development in a controlled, repeatable environment that complements traditional training methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed methods pilot study used a 2-stage approach. Stage 1 involved usability testing with 4 participants. Stage 2 included 59 participants from psychological practitioner training programs (a Low Intensity CBT Interventions Program and a Doctorate in Clinical Psychology) who engaged with the CBT Trainer voluntarily for over 1 month. Measures of impact included the System Usability Scale (SUS), platform naturalistic engagement, poststudy questionnaire on perceived competency development, comparative evaluation against traditional role-play, and qualitative feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants engaged voluntarily with the platform for an average of 95.24 (SD 134.58; median 45.34, IQR 11.57-105.15) minutes of active role-play. Platform usability was rated as excellent (mean SUS 82.20, SD 12.93). Self-reported competence improvement improved most in assessment skills (96.7%) and information gathering (66.7%). When compared to traditional peer role-play exercises, participants rated CBT Trainer moderately favorably (mean 5.90/10, SD 1.94). Qualitative feedback highlighted strengths in competency-aligned feedback, on-demand accessibility, and a psychologically safe practice space.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pilot study provides evidence that an artificial intelligence-based patient simulation shows promise as a supplementary training tool for psychological therapists who use CBT in their practice, particularly regarding accessibility and immediate feedback. Future research should use randomized controlled designs with objective competence assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"12 ","pages":"e84091"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12978919/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147436073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Performance Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Medical Multiple-Choice Questions: Mixed Methods Study. 大型语言模型在多语言医学选择题中的表现评价:混合方法研究。
IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2026-03-05 DOI: 10.2196/81399
Livia Maria Strasser, Wilma Anschuetz, Fabio Dennstädt, Janna Hastings
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence continues to transform health care, offering promising applications in clinical practice and medical education. While large language models (LLMs), as a form of generative artificial intelligence, have shown potential to match or surpass medical students in licensing examinations, their performance varies across languages. Recent studies highlight the complex influence and interdependency of factors such as language and model type on LLMs' accuracy; yet, cross-language comparisons remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the performance of LLMs in answering medical multiple-choice questions quantitatively and qualitatively across 3 languages (German, French, and Italian), aiming to uncover model capabilities in a multilingual medical education context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this mixed methods study, 114 publicly accessible multiple-choice questions in German, French, and Italian from an online self-assessment tool were analyzed. A quantitative performance analysis of several LLMs developed by OpenAI, Meta AI, Anthropic, and DeepSeek was conducted to evaluate their performance on answering the questions in text-only format. For the comparative analysis, a variation of input question language (German, French, and Italian) and prompt language (English vs language-matched) was used. The 2 best-performing LLMs were then prompted to provide answer explanations for incorrectly answered questions. A subsequent qualitative analysis was conducted on these explanations to identify the reasons leading to the incorrect answers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance of LLMs in answering medical multiple-choice questions varied by model and language, showing substantial differences in accuracy (between 64% and 87%). The effect of input question language was significant (P<.01) with models performing best on German questions. Across the analyzed LLMs, prompting in English generally led to better performance in comparison to language-matched prompts, but the top-performing models exceptionally showed comparable results for language-matched prompts. Qualitative analysis revealed that answer explanations of the analyzed models (GPT4o and Claude-Sonnet-3.7) showed different reasoning errors. In several explanations, this occurred despite factual accuracy on the represented topic. Furthermore, this analysis revealed 3 questions to be insufficiently precise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results underline the potential of LLMs in answering medical examination questions and highlight the importance of careful consideration of model choice, prompt, and input languages, because of relevant performance variability across these factors. Analysis of answer explanations demonstrates a valuable use case of LLMs for improving examination question quality in medical education, if data security regulations permit their use. Human oversight of language-sen
背景:人工智能继续改变医疗保健,在临床实践和医学教育中提供了有前景的应用。虽然大型语言模型(llm)作为生成式人工智能的一种形式,已经显示出在执照考试中匹配或超过医学生的潜力,但它们的表现因语言而异。最近的研究强调语言和模型类型等因素对法学硕士准确性的复杂影响和相互依赖性;然而,跨语言比较仍然没有得到充分的研究。目的:本研究评估法学硕士在三种语言(德语、法语和意大利语)中定量和定性地回答医学选择题的表现,旨在揭示多语言医学教育背景下的模型能力。方法:在这项混合方法研究中,从在线自我评估工具中分析了114个公开的德语、法语和意大利语多项选择题。对OpenAI、Meta AI、Anthropic和DeepSeek开发的几种llm进行了定量性能分析,以评估它们在纯文本格式回答问题时的性能。为了进行比较分析,使用了输入问题语言(德语、法语和意大利语)和提示语言(英语与语言匹配)的变体。然后,2名表现最好的法学硕士被要求对错误回答的问题提供答案解释。随后对这些解释进行定性分析,以确定导致错误答案的原因。结果:llm在回答医学选择题方面的表现因模型和语言的不同而不同,在准确率上有很大的差异(在64%和87%之间)。结论:我们的研究结果强调了llm在回答医学检查问题方面的潜力,并强调了仔细考虑模型选择、提示和输入语言的重要性,因为这些因素之间存在相关的性能差异。对答案解释的分析表明,在数据安全法规允许的情况下,法学硕士在提高医学教育考试问题质量方面是一个有价值的用例。人类对语言敏感或临床细微差别内容的监督对于确定错误输出是源于问题本身的缺陷还是法学硕士产生的错误仍然至关重要。需要进行持续的评估和透明的报告,以确保法学硕士可靠地纳入医学教育背景。
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Medical Multiple-Choice Questions: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Livia Maria Strasser, Wilma Anschuetz, Fabio Dennstädt, Janna Hastings","doi":"10.2196/81399","DOIUrl":"10.2196/81399","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Artificial intelligence continues to transform health care, offering promising applications in clinical practice and medical education. While large language models (LLMs), as a form of generative artificial intelligence, have shown potential to match or surpass medical students in licensing examinations, their performance varies across languages. Recent studies highlight the complex influence and interdependency of factors such as language and model type on LLMs' accuracy; yet, cross-language comparisons remain underexplored.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study evaluates the performance of LLMs in answering medical multiple-choice questions quantitatively and qualitatively across 3 languages (German, French, and Italian), aiming to uncover model capabilities in a multilingual medical education context.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;For this mixed methods study, 114 publicly accessible multiple-choice questions in German, French, and Italian from an online self-assessment tool were analyzed. A quantitative performance analysis of several LLMs developed by OpenAI, Meta AI, Anthropic, and DeepSeek was conducted to evaluate their performance on answering the questions in text-only format. For the comparative analysis, a variation of input question language (German, French, and Italian) and prompt language (English vs language-matched) was used. The 2 best-performing LLMs were then prompted to provide answer explanations for incorrectly answered questions. A subsequent qualitative analysis was conducted on these explanations to identify the reasons leading to the incorrect answers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;The performance of LLMs in answering medical multiple-choice questions varied by model and language, showing substantial differences in accuracy (between 64% and 87%). The effect of input question language was significant (P&lt;.01) with models performing best on German questions. Across the analyzed LLMs, prompting in English generally led to better performance in comparison to language-matched prompts, but the top-performing models exceptionally showed comparable results for language-matched prompts. Qualitative analysis revealed that answer explanations of the analyzed models (GPT4o and Claude-Sonnet-3.7) showed different reasoning errors. In several explanations, this occurred despite factual accuracy on the represented topic. Furthermore, this analysis revealed 3 questions to be insufficiently precise.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Our results underline the potential of LLMs in answering medical examination questions and highlight the importance of careful consideration of model choice, prompt, and input languages, because of relevant performance variability across these factors. Analysis of answer explanations demonstrates a valuable use case of LLMs for improving examination question quality in medical education, if data security regulations permit their use. Human oversight of language-sen","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"12 ","pages":"e81399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12978932/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147436305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Educational Formats and Content Domains of Interprofessional Education for Licensed Rehabilitation Professionals: Scoping Review. 持牌康复专业人员跨专业教育的教育形式和内容领域:范围审查。
IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2026-03-04 DOI: 10.2196/76189
Kohei Ikeda, Takao Kaneko, Someka Hijikuro, Natsuki Inoue, Takuto Nakamura, Taisei Takeda, Junya Uchida, Hirofumi Nagayama
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interprofessional education (IPE) is a key strategy for enhancing collaboration and patient safety. While evidence for student populations is abundant, studies focusing on licensed physical therapists (PTs), occupational therapists (OTs), and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) remain limited. In contemporary rehabilitation practice, continuous IPE is increasingly important to address professional burnout and the growing complexity of patient needs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aimed to systematically map and synthesize the educational formats, content domains, and reported outcomes of IPE programs specifically targeting licensed PTs, OTs, and SLPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, we searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Educational Resources Information Center databases through December 31, 2025. The eligibility criteria were based on the population, concept, and context framework, including peer-reviewed, English-language studies of licensed PTs, OTs, and SLPs (population) participating in structured IPE interventions (concept) within clinical or community settings (context). Studies focusing solely on students or prelicensure trainees were excluded. Following the screening of 3234 records by independent pairs of reviewers, 9 studies were ultimately selected for inclusion. Methodological quality was appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were synthesized using an evidence gap map to visualize research density across domains relative to established competency frameworks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 studies from Australia, the United States, Canada, and the Philippines were included, with sample sizes ranging from 8 to 197. Most used single-group pre-post or mixed methods designs; notably, no randomized controlled trials were identified. Methodological quality was generally high, though limited by the lack of control groups. Systematic mapping identified 7 educational formats, with lectures and discussions being the most dominant across all competency domains. Primary content domains included communication and role clarification. Specific successful interventions included pharmacist-led medication safety workshops and the Kawa model for team building. While participants reported immediate improvements in role understanding and collaborative confidence, simulation-based training showed inconsistent effects on long-term clinical behavior. A substantial evidence gap was identified in experiential learning approaches targeting collaborative leadership.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scoping review adds a novel perspective by focusing exclusively on licensed rehabilitation profes
背景:跨专业教育(IPE)是加强合作和患者安全的关键策略。虽然针对学生群体的证据非常丰富,但针对有执照的物理治疗师(PTs)、职业治疗师(OTs)和语言病理学家(slp)的研究仍然有限。在当代康复实践中,持续的IPE对于解决职业倦怠和患者需求日益复杂的问题越来越重要。目的:本范围综述旨在系统地绘制和综合IPE项目的教育格式、内容领域和报告结果,特别是针对获得许可的PTs、OTs和slp。方法:按照Joanna Briggs研究所和PRISMA-ScR(首选报告项目为系统评价和荟萃分析扩展范围评价)指南,我们检索PubMed, Web of Science,护理和相关健康文献累积索引和教育资源信息中心数据库,截至2025年12月31日。资格标准基于人群、概念和环境框架,包括同行评议的、有执照的PTs、OTs和slp(人群)在临床或社区环境(环境)中参与结构化IPE干预(概念)的英语研究。仅针对学生或执照前受训人员的研究被排除在外。在独立的审稿人对3234条记录进行筛选后,最终选择了9项研究纳入。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估清单和混合方法评估工具评估方法学质量。使用证据差距图来合成数据,以可视化相对于已建立的能力框架的跨领域研究密度。结果:共纳入来自澳大利亚、美国、加拿大和菲律宾的9项研究,样本量从8 ~ 197人不等。多采用单组pre-post或混合方法设计;值得注意的是,没有发现随机对照试验。方法质量总体较高,但由于缺乏对照组而受到限制。系统映射确定了7种教育形式,讲座和讨论是所有能力领域中最主要的。主要内容领域包括沟通和角色澄清。具体成功的干预措施包括药剂师领导的用药安全讲习班和Kawa团队建设模式。虽然参与者报告在角色理解和协作信心方面的即时改善,但基于模拟的培训对长期临床行为的影响并不一致。在针对协作领导的体验式学习方法中,发现了实质性的证据差距。结论:本综述通过专门关注有执照的康复专业人员(PTs, ot和slp)增加了一个新的视角,突出了与未获得执照的学生不同的学习需求。它使该领域对潜在的“领导差距”和目前对有经验的临床医生过度依赖教学方法有了更清晰的理解。现实世界的影响表明,卫生保健机构需要向包含客观行为评估的系统的、实践集成的IPE模型过渡。通过纵向项目解决协作领导和团队运作方面的差距,医疗机构可能有助于建立更具弹性的团队文化,最终提高患者安全和康复护理的质量。
{"title":"Educational Formats and Content Domains of Interprofessional Education for Licensed Rehabilitation Professionals: Scoping Review.","authors":"Kohei Ikeda, Takao Kaneko, Someka Hijikuro, Natsuki Inoue, Takuto Nakamura, Taisei Takeda, Junya Uchida, Hirofumi Nagayama","doi":"10.2196/76189","DOIUrl":"10.2196/76189","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Interprofessional education (IPE) is a key strategy for enhancing collaboration and patient safety. While evidence for student populations is abundant, studies focusing on licensed physical therapists (PTs), occupational therapists (OTs), and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) remain limited. In contemporary rehabilitation practice, continuous IPE is increasingly important to address professional burnout and the growing complexity of patient needs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This scoping review aimed to systematically map and synthesize the educational formats, content domains, and reported outcomes of IPE programs specifically targeting licensed PTs, OTs, and SLPs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Following Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, we searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Educational Resources Information Center databases through December 31, 2025. The eligibility criteria were based on the population, concept, and context framework, including peer-reviewed, English-language studies of licensed PTs, OTs, and SLPs (population) participating in structured IPE interventions (concept) within clinical or community settings (context). Studies focusing solely on students or prelicensure trainees were excluded. Following the screening of 3234 records by independent pairs of reviewers, 9 studies were ultimately selected for inclusion. Methodological quality was appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were synthesized using an evidence gap map to visualize research density across domains relative to established competency frameworks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 9 studies from Australia, the United States, Canada, and the Philippines were included, with sample sizes ranging from 8 to 197. Most used single-group pre-post or mixed methods designs; notably, no randomized controlled trials were identified. Methodological quality was generally high, though limited by the lack of control groups. Systematic mapping identified 7 educational formats, with lectures and discussions being the most dominant across all competency domains. Primary content domains included communication and role clarification. Specific successful interventions included pharmacist-led medication safety workshops and the Kawa model for team building. While participants reported immediate improvements in role understanding and collaborative confidence, simulation-based training showed inconsistent effects on long-term clinical behavior. A substantial evidence gap was identified in experiential learning approaches targeting collaborative leadership.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;This scoping review adds a novel perspective by focusing exclusively on licensed rehabilitation profes","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"12 ","pages":"e76189"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12978893/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147436246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Application of Mixed Reality for Ophthalmic Clinical Skills and Diagnosis: Prospective Study. 混合现实技术在眼科临床技能和诊断中的应用:前瞻性研究。
IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Pub Date : 2026-03-03 DOI: 10.2196/71338
Chun Jin Marcus Tan, Wei Wei Dayna Yong, Hui'En Hazel Anne Lin, Jaslyn Oh, How Sheng Rubin Yong, Fang Mei Jayme Khew, Liang Shen, Yujia Gao, Wei Chieh Alfred Kow, Yih Chung Tham, Dianbo Liu, Ching-Yu Cheng, Kee Yuan Ngiam, Yew Sen Yuen, Ray Manotosh, Eng Tat Khoo, Teck Chang Victor Koh, Woon Teck Clement Tan
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mixed reality has the potential to transform delivery of medical education. With tools such as HoloLens 2, educators can create immersive, interactive simulations that enable students to practice and engage with real-world scenarios in a controlled environment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We postulated that a hybrid ophthalmology curriculum incorporating EyelearnMR (a simulation application) would be noninferior to traditional teaching. We compared learning outcomes and obtained user feedback.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-blind, cluster-randomized prospective study. Fourth-year medical students were organized into batches and then assigned to 2 groups: EyelearnMR and control arms. We used a quasi-randomized design with alternation allocation based on clinical grouping. The intervention group had an additional 2 hours of practice with the EyelearnMR devices. During the second week of their posting, a video assessment (5 scenarios with 17 multiple-choice questions) was conducted for both groups-mid-posting for the intervention group and at the end of the posting for the control group. The rationale for assessing the intervention group earlier, in addition to setting a higher bar for EyelearnMR, was to allow for the provision of outcomes showing noninferiority between both groups. In the event of noninferiority, we could demonstrate that EyelearnMR can replace some degree of traditional clinical teaching, even with a shorter total clinical exposure time. Students in the control group were allowed to experience the Eyelearn MR modules for 2 hours at the end of the posting. Both groups were asked to complete the User Experience Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study was funded in February 2023, and recruitment took place from July 2023 to January 2024. A total of 54 students were recruited-24 (44.4%) in the control arm and 30 (55.6%) in the EyelearnMR arm. The EyelearnMR group performed significantly better than the control group (median scores of 16, IQR 15-17, and 15, IQR 14-15, respectively; P=.03; Mann-Whitney U test). A total of 100% (30/30) of the students in the EyelearnMR group scored full marks (3/3) for the technique portion, compared to 70.8% (17/24) of the students in the control group (P=.002). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the examination (P=.13) and pathology (P=.33) portions. This was despite the EyelearnMR group having a reduced clinical time of 7 days compared to 10 days in the control group. The User Experience Questionnaire showed positive evaluations for attractiveness (mean 1.413, SD 0.969), efficiency (mean 0.822, SD 1.068), dependability (mean 1.087, SD 0.801), stimulation (mean 1.577, SD 0.845), and novelty (mean 1.606, SD 0.967).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EyelearnMR with traditional teaching was noninferior to traditional teaching alone. It provided a comparable experience and supported learning o
背景:混合现实有可能改变医学教育的提供方式。借助HoloLens 2等工具,教育工作者可以创建身临其境的交互式模拟,使学生能够在受控环境中练习和参与现实世界的场景。目的:我们假设结合EyelearnMR(一种模拟应用程序)的混合眼科课程将不逊色于传统教学。我们比较了学习结果并获得了用户反馈。方法:这是一项单盲、集群随机的前瞻性研究。将四年级医学生分批分成两组:眼眼组和对照组。我们采用准随机设计,根据临床分组进行交替分配。干预组使用eyeearnmr设备进行了额外2小时的练习。在发布的第二周,两组都进行了视频评估(5个场景,17个选择题)——干预组在发布中间,对照组在发布结束。早期评估干预组的基本原理,除了为EyelearnMR设定更高的标准外,还允许提供两组之间非劣效性的结果。在非劣效性的情况下,我们可以证明eyeearnmr可以在一定程度上取代传统的临床教学,即使总临床暴露时间更短。对照组的学生在发帖结束时可以体验两个小时的Eyelearn MR模块。两组都被要求完成用户体验问卷。结果:本研究于2023年2月获得资助,招募时间为2023年7月至2024年1月。总共招募了54名学生,其中24名(44.4%)在对照组,30名(55.6%)在EyelearnMR组。EyelearnMR组显著优于对照组(中位得分分别为16分,IQR 15-17分和15分,IQR 14-15分;P= 0.03; Mann-Whitney U检验)。eyeearnmr组有100%(30/30)的学生在技术部分得到满分(3/3),而对照组有70.8%(17/24)的学生得到满分(P= 0.002)。检查部分(P= 0.13)和病理部分(P= 0.33)两组间差异无统计学意义。尽管与对照组的10天相比,EyelearnMR组的临床时间减少了7天。用户体验问卷在吸引力(平均1.413,SD 0.969)、效率(平均0.822,SD 1.068)、可靠性(平均1.087,SD 0.801)、刺激(平均1.577,SD 0.845)和新颖性(平均1.606,SD 0.967)方面均获得积极评价。结论:传统教学与传统教学相结合,效果不逊于单纯的传统教学。它提供了类似的经验,并平等地支持学习目标。这是一个有效的辅助教学工具,在眼科教育和可能赋予额外的学习效益超出传统的临床岗位。
{"title":"Application of Mixed Reality for Ophthalmic Clinical Skills and Diagnosis: Prospective Study.","authors":"Chun Jin Marcus Tan, Wei Wei Dayna Yong, Hui'En Hazel Anne Lin, Jaslyn Oh, How Sheng Rubin Yong, Fang Mei Jayme Khew, Liang Shen, Yujia Gao, Wei Chieh Alfred Kow, Yih Chung Tham, Dianbo Liu, Ching-Yu Cheng, Kee Yuan Ngiam, Yew Sen Yuen, Ray Manotosh, Eng Tat Khoo, Teck Chang Victor Koh, Woon Teck Clement Tan","doi":"10.2196/71338","DOIUrl":"10.2196/71338","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Mixed reality has the potential to transform delivery of medical education. With tools such as HoloLens 2, educators can create immersive, interactive simulations that enable students to practice and engage with real-world scenarios in a controlled environment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;We postulated that a hybrid ophthalmology curriculum incorporating EyelearnMR (a simulation application) would be noninferior to traditional teaching. We compared learning outcomes and obtained user feedback.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This was a single-blind, cluster-randomized prospective study. Fourth-year medical students were organized into batches and then assigned to 2 groups: EyelearnMR and control arms. We used a quasi-randomized design with alternation allocation based on clinical grouping. The intervention group had an additional 2 hours of practice with the EyelearnMR devices. During the second week of their posting, a video assessment (5 scenarios with 17 multiple-choice questions) was conducted for both groups-mid-posting for the intervention group and at the end of the posting for the control group. The rationale for assessing the intervention group earlier, in addition to setting a higher bar for EyelearnMR, was to allow for the provision of outcomes showing noninferiority between both groups. In the event of noninferiority, we could demonstrate that EyelearnMR can replace some degree of traditional clinical teaching, even with a shorter total clinical exposure time. Students in the control group were allowed to experience the Eyelearn MR modules for 2 hours at the end of the posting. Both groups were asked to complete the User Experience Questionnaire.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;This study was funded in February 2023, and recruitment took place from July 2023 to January 2024. A total of 54 students were recruited-24 (44.4%) in the control arm and 30 (55.6%) in the EyelearnMR arm. The EyelearnMR group performed significantly better than the control group (median scores of 16, IQR 15-17, and 15, IQR 14-15, respectively; P=.03; Mann-Whitney U test). A total of 100% (30/30) of the students in the EyelearnMR group scored full marks (3/3) for the technique portion, compared to 70.8% (17/24) of the students in the control group (P=.002). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the examination (P=.13) and pathology (P=.33) portions. This was despite the EyelearnMR group having a reduced clinical time of 7 days compared to 10 days in the control group. The User Experience Questionnaire showed positive evaluations for attractiveness (mean 1.413, SD 0.969), efficiency (mean 0.822, SD 1.068), dependability (mean 1.087, SD 0.801), stimulation (mean 1.577, SD 0.845), and novelty (mean 1.606, SD 0.967).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;EyelearnMR with traditional teaching was noninferior to traditional teaching alone. It provided a comparable experience and supported learning o","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"12 ","pages":"e71338"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12978906/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147436083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JMIR Medical Education
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1