首页 > 最新文献

JMIR Aging最新文献

英文 中文
Implementation of the German Clinical Practice Guideline for Multimorbidity Using a Digital Tool in Primary Care: Pilot Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. 在初级保健中使用数字工具实施德国多病临床实践指南:试点集群随机临床试验。
IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.2196/79767
Julia Nothacker, Valentina Paucke, Susanne Lezius, Antonia Zapf, Dagmar Lühmann, Martin Scherer, Ingmar Schäfer
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) summarize the best available evidence in a specific field. To improve patient-centered outcomes, guidelines have to be implemented, using, for example, information and communications technology. Although there are CPGs addressing multimorbidity, there is still a lack of studies investigating their implementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate whether the implementation of a CPG for multimorbidity using a digital tool is feasible and explore possible effects of this intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot cluster randomized clinical trial based on telephone interviews was conducted from October 25, 2023, to September 8, 2024. Patients enrolled in any disease management program who were aged ≥65 years and had at least 2 additional chronic conditions were randomly selected from 20 general practitioner (GP) practices and contacted for informed consent. Each practice was randomized after baseline interviews of all participating patients in the practice were finished. The use of a web application facilitating collection and documentation of treatment-relevant data in accordance with the German CPG for multimorbidity was compared with treatment as usual. The primary outcome was time spent in hospital. As a secondary outcome, the number of patients with at least one hospital admission was calculated. Further secondary outcomes included outpatient health care use, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and quality of care. Feasibility assessment included examination of sample size, participation rate, and compliance with the study protocol. Outcome measures were analyzed using linear, logistic, and negative binomial regressions with random intercepts for practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 384 patients who were contacted, 123 (32%) agreed to participate, and 120 (31.3%, including 54/120, 45% in the intervention group and 66/120, 55% in the control group) completed baseline and follow-up assessments. Mean age was 75.4 (SD 6.6) years, and 51.7% (62/120) were women. The compliance rate, or the proportion of patients who were treated per protocol, was 89% (48/54). In our data, the incidence rate of hospital days was comparable in both groups (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.94, 95% CI 0.09-9.42; P=.96), but the odds of hospital admission were almost reduced by half in the intervention group (odds ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.17-1.54; P=.23). Our data also suggest a higher incidence rate of GP contacts (IRR 1.13, 95% CI 0.83-1.53; P=.43) and lower incidence rate of contacts with outpatient specialists (IRR 0.79, 95% CI 0.54-1.15; P=.24) in the intervention group compared to usual care. Moreover, patients and GPs reported a better quality of care (mean difference 0.51, 95% CI -0.12 to 1.14; P=.12 and mean difference 1.19, 95% CI 0.13-2.25; P=.03, respectively) in the intervention group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of the CPG u
背景:临床实践指南(CPGs)总结了特定领域的最佳证据。为了改善以患者为中心的结果,必须实施指导方针,例如使用信息和通信技术。虽然有CPGs解决多病,仍然缺乏研究调查其实施。目的:本研究旨在评估使用数字工具对多种疾病实施CPG是否可行,并探讨这种干预的可能效果。方法:于2023年10月25日至2024年9月8日,采用电话访谈法进行随机临床试验。从20名全科医生(GP)执业中随机选择年龄≥65岁且至少有2种额外慢性疾病的患者参加任何疾病管理项目,并联系他们获得知情同意。在所有参与实践的患者的基线访谈完成后,每个实践被随机化。使用网络应用程序,根据德国多病CPG,方便收集和记录治疗相关数据,并与常规治疗进行比较。主要观察指标为住院时间。作为次要结局,计算至少住院一次的患者人数。进一步的次要结局包括门诊医疗服务的使用、生活质量、患者满意度和护理质量。可行性评估包括样本量、参与率和研究方案的依从性。结果测量采用线性、逻辑和负二项回归分析,随机截距。结果:在接触的384例患者中,123例(32%)同意参与,120例(31.3%,其中干预组54/ 120,45%,对照组66/ 120,55%)完成了基线和随访评估。平均年龄75.4岁(SD 6.6), 51.7%(62/120)为女性。依从率,或接受每个方案治疗的患者比例为89%(48/54)。在我们的数据中,两组住院天数的发生率相当(发病率比[IRR] 0.94, 95% CI 0.09-9.42; P= 0.96),但干预组住院的几率几乎减少了一半(优势比0.51,95% CI 0.17-1.54; P= 0.23)。我们的数据还表明,与常规护理相比,干预组GP接触的发生率更高(IRR 1.13, 95% CI 0.83-1.53; P= 0.43),与门诊专家接触的发生率更低(IRR 0.79, 95% CI 0.54-1.15; P= 0.24)。此外,干预组患者和全科医生报告了更好的护理质量(平均差异0.51,95% CI -0.12至1.14;P= 0.12,平均差异1.19,95% CI 0.13-2.25; P= 0.03)。结论:使用数字化工具实施CPG是可行的。我们的数据表明,住院和与门诊专家接触的概率可能会降低,护理质量可能会得到改善。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06061172;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06061172。
{"title":"Implementation of the German Clinical Practice Guideline for Multimorbidity Using a Digital Tool in Primary Care: Pilot Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Julia Nothacker, Valentina Paucke, Susanne Lezius, Antonia Zapf, Dagmar Lühmann, Martin Scherer, Ingmar Schäfer","doi":"10.2196/79767","DOIUrl":"10.2196/79767","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) summarize the best available evidence in a specific field. To improve patient-centered outcomes, guidelines have to be implemented, using, for example, information and communications technology. Although there are CPGs addressing multimorbidity, there is still a lack of studies investigating their implementation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aimed to evaluate whether the implementation of a CPG for multimorbidity using a digital tool is feasible and explore possible effects of this intervention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A pilot cluster randomized clinical trial based on telephone interviews was conducted from October 25, 2023, to September 8, 2024. Patients enrolled in any disease management program who were aged ≥65 years and had at least 2 additional chronic conditions were randomly selected from 20 general practitioner (GP) practices and contacted for informed consent. Each practice was randomized after baseline interviews of all participating patients in the practice were finished. The use of a web application facilitating collection and documentation of treatment-relevant data in accordance with the German CPG for multimorbidity was compared with treatment as usual. The primary outcome was time spent in hospital. As a secondary outcome, the number of patients with at least one hospital admission was calculated. Further secondary outcomes included outpatient health care use, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and quality of care. Feasibility assessment included examination of sample size, participation rate, and compliance with the study protocol. Outcome measures were analyzed using linear, logistic, and negative binomial regressions with random intercepts for practices.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Of 384 patients who were contacted, 123 (32%) agreed to participate, and 120 (31.3%, including 54/120, 45% in the intervention group and 66/120, 55% in the control group) completed baseline and follow-up assessments. Mean age was 75.4 (SD 6.6) years, and 51.7% (62/120) were women. The compliance rate, or the proportion of patients who were treated per protocol, was 89% (48/54). In our data, the incidence rate of hospital days was comparable in both groups (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.94, 95% CI 0.09-9.42; P=.96), but the odds of hospital admission were almost reduced by half in the intervention group (odds ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.17-1.54; P=.23). Our data also suggest a higher incidence rate of GP contacts (IRR 1.13, 95% CI 0.83-1.53; P=.43) and lower incidence rate of contacts with outpatient specialists (IRR 0.79, 95% CI 0.54-1.15; P=.24) in the intervention group compared to usual care. Moreover, patients and GPs reported a better quality of care (mean difference 0.51, 95% CI -0.12 to 1.14; P=.12 and mean difference 1.19, 95% CI 0.13-2.25; P=.03, respectively) in the intervention group.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Implementation of the CPG u","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e79767"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12679070/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145565816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Digital Measurement of Subjective Experiences in Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias (AD/ADRD). 阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(AD/ADRD)主观体验的数字化测量。
IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-18 DOI: 10.2196/71920
Colin Depp, Jason Holden, Eric Granholm

Unlabelled: Symptoms such as loss of pleasure, agitation, and sadness are subjective experiences that contribute significantly to caregiver burden and health care costs in Alzheimer disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD). However, traditional self-report measures of subjective experiences are limited in AD/ADRD due to cognitive impairments and awareness. Passive sensing, which collects data without active participant input, has emerged as a promising approach to quantify aspects of subjective experiences. Smartphones, wearables, and in-home sensors can quantify mobility, physiology, speech, and social interaction markers of constructs relevant to AD/ADRD. Available research indicates potential but is largely at the proof-of-concept stage. In this Commentary, we discuss several roadblocks to future translation of passive sensing in measuring subjective experiences in AD/ADRD, including technical implementation, data harmonization, validation, ethical and privacy principles. Addressing these challenges could lead to transformative applications to care for AD/ADRD, enabling precise monitoring of behavioral symptoms and related treatment targets, ultimately improving quality of life for persons with AD/ADRD and their caregivers.

未标记:阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(AD/ADRD)患者的愉悦感丧失、躁动和悲伤等症状是主观体验,显著增加了护理者负担和医疗费用。然而,由于认知障碍和意识障碍,传统的主观体验自我报告测量在AD/ADRD中受到限制。被动感知,在没有积极参与者输入的情况下收集数据,已经成为一种有前途的量化主观体验方面的方法。智能手机、可穿戴设备和家庭传感器可以量化与AD/ADRD相关的移动性、生理、言语和社会互动标志。现有的研究表明有潜力,但主要处于概念验证阶段。在这篇评论中,我们讨论了在AD/ADRD中测量主观体验的被动感知未来翻译的几个障碍,包括技术实施、数据协调、验证、道德和隐私原则。解决这些挑战可能会导致AD/ADRD护理的变革性应用,从而能够精确监测行为症状和相关治疗目标,最终改善AD/ADRD患者及其护理人员的生活质量。
{"title":"Digital Measurement of Subjective Experiences in Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias (AD/ADRD).","authors":"Colin Depp, Jason Holden, Eric Granholm","doi":"10.2196/71920","DOIUrl":"10.2196/71920","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Symptoms such as loss of pleasure, agitation, and sadness are subjective experiences that contribute significantly to caregiver burden and health care costs in Alzheimer disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD). However, traditional self-report measures of subjective experiences are limited in AD/ADRD due to cognitive impairments and awareness. Passive sensing, which collects data without active participant input, has emerged as a promising approach to quantify aspects of subjective experiences. Smartphones, wearables, and in-home sensors can quantify mobility, physiology, speech, and social interaction markers of constructs relevant to AD/ADRD. Available research indicates potential but is largely at the proof-of-concept stage. In this Commentary, we discuss several roadblocks to future translation of passive sensing in measuring subjective experiences in AD/ADRD, including technical implementation, data harmonization, validation, ethical and privacy principles. Addressing these challenges could lead to transformative applications to care for AD/ADRD, enabling precise monitoring of behavioral symptoms and related treatment targets, ultimately improving quality of life for persons with AD/ADRD and their caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e71920"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12626243/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145551339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of Digital Technology on the Physical Health of Older Workers: Scoping Review. 数字技术对老年工人身体健康的影响:范围审查。
IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-18 DOI: 10.2196/78406
Jeroen Ja Spijker, Hande Barlın, Melina Dritsaki, Yang Gu, Aija Klavina, Nilufer Korkmaz Yaylagul, Gunilla Kulla, Murat Anil Mercan, Eda Orhun, Anna Sevcikova, Brigid Unim, Gunay Yildizer, Cristina Maria Tofan

Background: Digital technologies are increasingly present in workplaces; however, their impact on the physical health of older workers remains unclear.

Objective: This scoping review aims to examine and summarize the scientific evidence on how digital technology affects the physical health of older workers.

Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of English-language peer-reviewed studies extracted from MEDLINE, Cochrane, ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, APA PsycInfo, and ERIH PLUS. The review followed the population, concept, and context (PCC) framework, including studies on workers aged 50 years or older, any form of digital technology (eg, teleworking and the use of digital tools at work), and its impact on physical health (eg, vision loss and musculoskeletal disorders). Studies that focused only on mental health were excluded. A 13-member research team screened studies in 3 stages, namely title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction. Each study was independently reviewed by at least 2 researchers, and disagreements were resolved through discussion. Data extraction and synthesis were conducted using the web-based systematic review platform Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation Ltd).

Results: In total, 18 studies were selected, published between 2012 and 2024, with most conducted in Europe (n=8) and Asia (n=6), followed by North America (n=2), Oceania (n=1), and Africa (n=1). We identified 6 key physical health areas impacted by digital technology in older workers, including eye health, musculoskeletal health, metabolic and cardiovascular health, workplace sound levels, and user experiences of new technologies. Findings showed mixed effects, with notable negative impacts on eye strain, musculoskeletal disorders, and hearing health issues, but positive effects on weight management, cardiovascular health, physical activity, and perceived physical well-being.

Conclusions: Digital technology presents both risks and benefits for the physical health of older workers. While prolonged screen use and digital work environments contribute to eye strain, musculoskeletal issues, and hearing concerns, other technologies support better weight management, cardiovascular health, and increased physical activity. These findings also underscore the need for workplace intervention to reduce health risks.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/59900.

背景:数字技术越来越多地出现在工作场所;然而,它们对老年工人身体健康的影响尚不清楚。目的:本综述旨在检查和总结有关数字技术如何影响老年工人身体健康的科学证据。方法:根据PRISMA-ScR(首选系统评价报告项目和范围评价扩展元分析)指南,我们对MEDLINE、Cochrane、ProQuest、Web of Science、Scopus、APA PsycInfo和ERIH PLUS等英文同行评议研究进行了范围评价。该审查遵循了人口、概念和背景(PCC)框架,包括对50岁或以上的工人、任何形式的数字技术(如远程工作和在工作中使用数字工具)及其对身体健康的影响(如视力丧失和肌肉骨骼疾病)的研究。只关注心理健康的研究被排除在外。由13人组成的研究小组分三个阶段对研究进行筛选,即标题和摘要筛选、全文审查和数据提取。每项研究都由至少2名研究人员独立审查,并通过讨论解决分歧。使用基于网络的系统评价平台covid - ence (Veritas Health Innovation Ltd)进行数据提取和综合。结果:共选择了18项研究,发表于2012年至2024年之间,其中大多数在欧洲(n=8)和亚洲(n=6)进行,其次是北美(n=2)、大洋洲(n=1)和非洲(n=1)。我们确定了数字技术对老年员工身体健康影响的6个关键领域,包括眼睛健康、肌肉骨骼健康、代谢和心血管健康、工作场所声音水平和新技术的用户体验。研究结果显示了混合效果,对眼睛疲劳、肌肉骨骼疾病和听力健康问题有显著的负面影响,但对体重管理、心血管健康、身体活动和感知身体健康有积极影响。结论:数字技术对老年工人的身体健康既有风险也有益处。虽然长时间使用屏幕和数字工作环境会导致眼睛疲劳、肌肉骨骼问题和听力问题,但其他技术可以帮助改善体重管理、心血管健康和增加体力活动。这些发现还强调了工作场所干预以降低健康风险的必要性。国际注册报告标识符(irrid): RR2-10.2196/59900。
{"title":"The Impact of Digital Technology on the Physical Health of Older Workers: Scoping Review.","authors":"Jeroen Ja Spijker, Hande Barlın, Melina Dritsaki, Yang Gu, Aija Klavina, Nilufer Korkmaz Yaylagul, Gunilla Kulla, Murat Anil Mercan, Eda Orhun, Anna Sevcikova, Brigid Unim, Gunay Yildizer, Cristina Maria Tofan","doi":"10.2196/78406","DOIUrl":"10.2196/78406","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital technologies are increasingly present in workplaces; however, their impact on the physical health of older workers remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review aims to examine and summarize the scientific evidence on how digital technology affects the physical health of older workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, we conducted a scoping review of English-language peer-reviewed studies extracted from MEDLINE, Cochrane, ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, APA PsycInfo, and ERIH PLUS. The review followed the population, concept, and context (PCC) framework, including studies on workers aged 50 years or older, any form of digital technology (eg, teleworking and the use of digital tools at work), and its impact on physical health (eg, vision loss and musculoskeletal disorders). Studies that focused only on mental health were excluded. A 13-member research team screened studies in 3 stages, namely title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction. Each study was independently reviewed by at least 2 researchers, and disagreements were resolved through discussion. Data extraction and synthesis were conducted using the web-based systematic review platform Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation Ltd).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 18 studies were selected, published between 2012 and 2024, with most conducted in Europe (n=8) and Asia (n=6), followed by North America (n=2), Oceania (n=1), and Africa (n=1). We identified 6 key physical health areas impacted by digital technology in older workers, including eye health, musculoskeletal health, metabolic and cardiovascular health, workplace sound levels, and user experiences of new technologies. Findings showed mixed effects, with notable negative impacts on eye strain, musculoskeletal disorders, and hearing health issues, but positive effects on weight management, cardiovascular health, physical activity, and perceived physical well-being.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital technology presents both risks and benefits for the physical health of older workers. While prolonged screen use and digital work environments contribute to eye strain, musculoskeletal issues, and hearing concerns, other technologies support better weight management, cardiovascular health, and increased physical activity. These findings also underscore the need for workplace intervention to reduce health risks.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.2196/59900.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e78406"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12673309/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145551430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using Smart Displays to Implement an eHealth System for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Randomized Controlled Trial. 使用智能显示器为患有多种慢性病的老年人实施电子健康系统:一项随机对照试验。
IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-18 DOI: 10.2196/75991
Gina Landucci, David H Gustafson, Marie-Louise Mares, Klaren Pe-Romashko, John J Curtin, Yaxin Hu, Adam Maus, Kasey Thompson, Sydney Saunders, Kaitlyn Brown, Judith Woodburn, Bilge Mutlu
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smart displays and speakers offer voice interaction, which may be more accessible and appealing to older adults with chronic pain and other multimorbid conditions. Previous trials found stronger socioemotional benefits of ElderTree (vs control) among those with high primary care use and multiple chronic conditions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to test whether older adults with chronic pain and multiple other chronic conditions use and benefit more from ElderTree, an eHealth intervention targeting pain and quality of life, when delivered on a smart display.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 269 participants from the University of Wisconsin-Madison health system and community organizations and randomly assigned 1:1:1 to (1) smart display with internet and ElderTree, plus usual care; (2) touchscreen laptop with internet and ElderTree, plus usual care; or (3) usual care alone. Participants were aged ≥60 years, had a chronic pain diagnosis or reported chronic pain, and at least 3 common chronic conditions. Primary outcomes were pain interference and psychosocial quality of life. Data sources were baseline, 4-month, and 8-month surveys and continuous ElderTree usage data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between the laptop versus smart display groups for pain interference (b=-0.11, 95% CI -1.07 to 0.85; P=.82) or psychosocial quality (b=-0.21, 95% CI -0.96 to 0.55; P=.56), nor between the combined laptop+smart display group versus control group for either outcome (pain interference: b=-0.41, 95% CI -1.23 to 0.41; P=.33; psychosocial quality of life: b=0.04, 95% CI -0.61 to 0.69; P=.90). Mediation was not tested because effects on primary outcomes were nonsignificant. Gender did not moderate the effect of laptop versus smart display groups in pain interference (b=-1.56, 95% CI -3.56 to 0.44; P=.13). Gender did moderate the effect of the combined laptop+smart display group versus control group (b=1.91, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.71; P=.04). Women showed a significant decrease in pain interference (b=-0.69, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.10; P=.02), whereas women in the control group showed no significant change (b=0.25, 95% CI -0.53 to 1.04; P=.53). Men in the combined group showed a nonsignificant decrease (b=-0.67, 95% CI -1.47 to 0.14; P=.10), whereas men in the control group showed a significant decrease (b=-1.61, 95% CI -2.88 to -0.35; P=.01). Participants assigned to the laptop versus smart display used ElderTree more frequently and had more favorable perceptions. Analyses of secondary and exploratory outcomes showed no significant differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no significant differences between the combined ElderTree group and the control group for changes over time in any primary, secondary, or exploratory outcomes. Moderation analyses indicated that only gender moderated study arm effects, and only for the laptop+smart displa
背景:智能显示器和智能扬声器提供了轻松的语音交互,对于患有慢性疼痛和其他多病慢性疾病的老年人来说,这可能更容易获得和吸引人。先前的ElderTree试验发现,对于初级保健使用率高的老年人和患有多种慢性疾病的老年人,ElderTree的社会情感益处(与对照组相比)更强,并且女性的社会情感益处强于男性。目的:本研究测试了患有慢性疼痛的老年人,在多种其他慢性疾病的背景下,如果给他们智能显示器而不是笔记本电脑进行干预,是否会更多地使用ElderTree,并从中获益,ElderTree是一种针对疼痛和生活质量的数字/电子健康干预,以及智能显示器组和笔记本电脑组是否会相对于没有设备或无法进行干预的对照组显示出益处。方法:在一项非盲、随机对照试验中,从威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校家庭医学和普通内科系统(UW Health)以及麦迪逊、密尔沃基和伯洛伊特地区的社区组织招募了269名患有慢性疼痛和至少3种高风险慢性疾病的参与者,并按1:1:1的比例分配到(1)有互联网接入和接骨树的智能显示器,以及他们的日常护理;(2)可上网的触屏笔记本电脑和ElderTree,以及日常护理;或者(3)单独进行常规护理。所有参与者年龄在60岁或以上,有慢性疼痛诊断和/或报告慢性疼痛,并且至少有三种常见的慢性疾病。主要结局是疼痛干扰和心理社会生活质量。随着时间的推移,研究组(ElderTree vs主动对照组)对主要结果变化的影响的拟议中介是4个月时ElderTree的使用(仅适用于ElderTree组)、能力、相关性、动机、锻炼和疼痛强度。调节因素是性别、慢性病数量和技术使用障碍。数据来源是基线、4个月和8个月的调查,并持续收集ElderTree的使用情况。结果:笔记本电脑组与智能显示器组之间疼痛干扰随时间的变化无显著差异(臂x时间交互作用b = -0.11, 95% CI -1.07至0.85;p = 0.82)或心理社会生活质量随时间的变化(臂x时间交互作用b = -0.21, 95% CI -0.96至0.55,p = 0.56)。笔记本电脑+智能显示器组合组与对照组在疼痛干扰随时间变化(臂x时间相互作用b = -0.41, 95% Cl -1.23至0.41;p = 0.33)和心理社会生活质量随时间变化(臂x时间相互作用:b = 0.04, 95% Cl -0.61至0.69;p = 0.90)方面也无显著差异。由于研究组对主要结局的影响不显著,因此未对主要结局进行中介检验。性别并没有调节笔记本电脑组与智能显示器组对疼痛干扰随时间变化的影响(b = -1.56, CI -3.56至0.44,p = 0.13)。与对照组相比,性别确实会调节笔记本电脑+智能显示器组合组的效果(b = 1.91, CI 0.11至3.71,p = 0.037)。笔记本电脑+智能显示器组合组的女性随着时间的推移,疼痛干扰显著减少(b = -0.69, CI -1.29至-0.10,p = 0.022);对照组无显著差异(b = 0.25, CI -0.53 ~ 1.04, p = 0.53)。笔记本电脑+智能显示器组合组男性无显著下降(b = -0.67, CI -1.47至0.14,p = .10);对照组明显降低(b = -1.61, CI = -2.88 ~ -0.35, p = 0.013)。被分配到笔记本电脑(与智能显示器相比)的参与者更频繁地使用ElderTree,并且对其有更积极的看法。然而,那些使用智能显示器的人使用的时间更长。次要和探索性结果分析显示,笔记本电脑组和智能显示器组之间、笔记本电脑+智能显示器组合组与对照组之间没有显著差异。结论:我们发现ElderTree联合治疗组和对照组在任何主要、次要或探索性结果随时间的变化上没有显著差异。调节分析表明,只有性别调节了研究组的影响,并且只有笔记本电脑+智能显示器组与对照组对两个主要结果随时间变化的影响。临床试验:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04798196。国际注册报告:RR2-10.2196/37522。
{"title":"Using Smart Displays to Implement an eHealth System for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Gina Landucci, David H Gustafson, Marie-Louise Mares, Klaren Pe-Romashko, John J Curtin, Yaxin Hu, Adam Maus, Kasey Thompson, Sydney Saunders, Kaitlyn Brown, Judith Woodburn, Bilge Mutlu","doi":"10.2196/75991","DOIUrl":"10.2196/75991","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Smart displays and speakers offer voice interaction, which may be more accessible and appealing to older adults with chronic pain and other multimorbid conditions. Previous trials found stronger socioemotional benefits of ElderTree (vs control) among those with high primary care use and multiple chronic conditions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study aims to test whether older adults with chronic pain and multiple other chronic conditions use and benefit more from ElderTree, an eHealth intervention targeting pain and quality of life, when delivered on a smart display.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We recruited 269 participants from the University of Wisconsin-Madison health system and community organizations and randomly assigned 1:1:1 to (1) smart display with internet and ElderTree, plus usual care; (2) touchscreen laptop with internet and ElderTree, plus usual care; or (3) usual care alone. Participants were aged ≥60 years, had a chronic pain diagnosis or reported chronic pain, and at least 3 common chronic conditions. Primary outcomes were pain interference and psychosocial quality of life. Data sources were baseline, 4-month, and 8-month surveys and continuous ElderTree usage data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;No significant differences were found between the laptop versus smart display groups for pain interference (b=-0.11, 95% CI -1.07 to 0.85; P=.82) or psychosocial quality (b=-0.21, 95% CI -0.96 to 0.55; P=.56), nor between the combined laptop+smart display group versus control group for either outcome (pain interference: b=-0.41, 95% CI -1.23 to 0.41; P=.33; psychosocial quality of life: b=0.04, 95% CI -0.61 to 0.69; P=.90). Mediation was not tested because effects on primary outcomes were nonsignificant. Gender did not moderate the effect of laptop versus smart display groups in pain interference (b=-1.56, 95% CI -3.56 to 0.44; P=.13). Gender did moderate the effect of the combined laptop+smart display group versus control group (b=1.91, 95% CI 0.11 to 3.71; P=.04). Women showed a significant decrease in pain interference (b=-0.69, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.10; P=.02), whereas women in the control group showed no significant change (b=0.25, 95% CI -0.53 to 1.04; P=.53). Men in the combined group showed a nonsignificant decrease (b=-0.67, 95% CI -1.47 to 0.14; P=.10), whereas men in the control group showed a significant decrease (b=-1.61, 95% CI -2.88 to -0.35; P=.01). Participants assigned to the laptop versus smart display used ElderTree more frequently and had more favorable perceptions. Analyses of secondary and exploratory outcomes showed no significant differences between groups.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;We found no significant differences between the combined ElderTree group and the control group for changes over time in any primary, secondary, or exploratory outcomes. Moderation analyses indicated that only gender moderated study arm effects, and only for the laptop+smart displa","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":" ","pages":"e75991"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12673301/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145081764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors Associated With the Ability To Keep Up With Technology Developments: Findings From a National Multigenerational Cross-Sectional Survey in Sweden. 与跟上技术发展能力相关的因素:瑞典一项全国多代人横断面调查的结果。
IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-14 DOI: 10.2196/77930
Jens Offerman, Sofi Fristedt, Steven M Schmidt, Susanne Iwarsson

Background: Digital technologies are increasingly central to supporting autonomy, health, and social participation in later life. However, disparities persist in the ability to keep up with technological developments, affecting individuals' opportunities to benefit from digital health and social innovations.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate factors associated with individuals' self-reported ability to keep up with technological developments, focusing on generational differences, attitudes toward digital tools, and sociodemographic characteristics.

Methods: We conducted a national cross-sectional online survey in Sweden with 2121 respondents aged 30 to 39 years, 50 to 59 years, and 70 to 79 years. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify associations between self-reported ability to keep up with technology and independent variables, including attitudes toward information and communication technology, gender, education, self-rated economic situation, and general health.

Results: Most respondents reported being able to keep up with technological developments. Compared to the oldest generation (70-79 years), participants aged 30 to 39 years had 188% higher odds (odds ratio [OR] 2.88, 95% CI 1.84-4.53) of reporting they kept up with technology developments, and women had lower odds than men (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39-0.70). Positive attitudes toward information and communication technology being user-friendly (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.21-2.73), timesaving (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.44-2.87), and increasing independence (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.33-2.96) were also significantly associated with keeping up.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that digital inclusion in aging societies is shaped by complex and intersecting factors that go beyond age. Promoting equitable digital engagement requires addressing attitudinal, economic, and gender-related barriers and fostering inclusive technology design and support systems for both current and future generations of older adults.

背景:数字技术在支持老年生活中的自主性、健康和社会参与方面越来越重要。然而,在跟上技术发展的能力方面仍然存在差距,影响了个人从数字卫生和社会创新中受益的机会。目的:本研究旨在探讨与个人自我报告的跟上技术发展能力相关的因素,重点关注代际差异、对数字工具的态度和社会人口特征。方法:我们在瑞典进行了一项全国性的横断面在线调查,有2121名受访者,年龄为30至39岁,50至59岁,70至79岁。使用Logistic回归分析来确定自我报告的跟上技术的能力与自变量之间的关联,自变量包括对信息和通信技术的态度、性别、教育、自评的经济状况和一般健康状况。结果:大多数受访者表示能够跟上技术发展。与最年长的一代(70-79岁)相比,30 - 39岁的参与者报告自己跟上技术发展的几率高出188%(比值比[OR] 2.88, 95% CI 1.84-4.53),女性的比值低于男性(OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39-0.70)。对信息通信技术用户友好(OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.21-2.73),节省时间(OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.44-2.87)和增加独立性(OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.33-2.96)的积极态度也与保持保持显著相关。结论:这些发现表明,老龄化社会中的数字包容受到年龄以外的复杂和交叉因素的影响。促进公平的数字参与需要解决态度、经济和性别方面的障碍,并为当前和未来的老年人建立包容性的技术设计和支持系统。
{"title":"Factors Associated With the Ability To Keep Up With Technology Developments: Findings From a National Multigenerational Cross-Sectional Survey in Sweden.","authors":"Jens Offerman, Sofi Fristedt, Steven M Schmidt, Susanne Iwarsson","doi":"10.2196/77930","DOIUrl":"10.2196/77930","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital technologies are increasingly central to supporting autonomy, health, and social participation in later life. However, disparities persist in the ability to keep up with technological developments, affecting individuals' opportunities to benefit from digital health and social innovations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate factors associated with individuals' self-reported ability to keep up with technological developments, focusing on generational differences, attitudes toward digital tools, and sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a national cross-sectional online survey in Sweden with 2121 respondents aged 30 to 39 years, 50 to 59 years, and 70 to 79 years. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify associations between self-reported ability to keep up with technology and independent variables, including attitudes toward information and communication technology, gender, education, self-rated economic situation, and general health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents reported being able to keep up with technological developments. Compared to the oldest generation (70-79 years), participants aged 30 to 39 years had 188% higher odds (odds ratio [OR] 2.88, 95% CI 1.84-4.53) of reporting they kept up with technology developments, and women had lower odds than men (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.39-0.70). Positive attitudes toward information and communication technology being user-friendly (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.21-2.73), timesaving (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.44-2.87), and increasing independence (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.33-2.96) were also significantly associated with keeping up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that digital inclusion in aging societies is shaped by complex and intersecting factors that go beyond age. Promoting equitable digital engagement requires addressing attitudinal, economic, and gender-related barriers and fostering inclusive technology design and support systems for both current and future generations of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e77930"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12617988/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145524488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Risk Factors for Community-Dwelling Older Adults Dropping Out of Self-Guided, Remote, and Web-Based Longitudinal Research: Predictive Modeling of Data from the Web-LABrainS Platform. 社区居住老年人退出自我引导、远程和基于网络的纵向研究的风险因素:来自Web-LABrainS平台数据的预测建模。
IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.2196/68826
Luke Daniel Braun, H Raymond Allen, Jeffrey N Keller
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is currently known regarding the feasibility of using a self-guided, remote, web-based platform as the basis for a longitudinal study of aging in community-dwelling older adults (OAs). This study describes the feasibility and risk factors for participant dropout found when using this approach as part of the web-based Louisiana Aging Brain Study (web-LABrainS).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study used data from 402 participants in the web-LABrainS effort to determine the feasibility of using a self-guided, remote, and web-based platform as the basis for conducting longitudinal research in community-dwelling older adults. Additionally, we sought to determine the risk factors associated with participant dropout over a 12-month period in web-LABrainS and determine whether the same risk factors associated with dropout from in-clinic longitudinal studies were observed in web-LABrainS dropouts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were enrolled in web-LABrainS on a rolling basis using word-of-mouth promotional efforts. Participants used the web-LABrainS platform to provide electronic consent, demographic and health information, answer questionnaires, and complete assessments as part of a self-guided and web-based effort off-site of the clinic (remote). Following completion of the baseline battery, participants were contacted by email every 6 months to complete another round of the web-LABrainS battery. The data in this study were collected from 402 participants, 217 (54.0%) of whom completed baseline, 6-month, and 12-month assessments (adherent participants) and 185 (46%) of whom participated in only the baseline and no subsequent web-LABrainS batteries (dropout participants).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study indicates that even with limited participant outreach and retention efforts, it is feasible to conduct longitudinal clinical research studies in community-dwelling OAs using a self-guided, remote, and web-based approach. In contrast to traditional in-clinic longitudinal studies, dropouts from web-LABrainS were not observed to be significantly different with respect to age, education, gender, marital status, or living alone (P=.67, .16, .29, .051, .31). Similar to traditional longitudinal studies, dropouts from web-LABrainS had significantly higher use of depression medication, decreased self-reported mobility, and decreased delayed recall performance (P=.007, .007, .004). Interestingly, no differences in technology use, comfort with technology, time of assessment, or consent to be contacted about future research were observed between adherents and dropouts (P=.17, .36, .47, .40). Predictive binary logistic regression yielded a moderately accurate model and further supported a negative association between cognitive ability and dropout (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study provides some of the first clinical evidence for the feasibility of conducting
背景:目前关于使用自我引导、远程、基于网络的平台作为社区居住老年人(OAs)老龄化纵向研究基础的可行性知之甚少。本研究描述了当使用此方法作为基于网络的路易斯安那脑老化研究(web-LABrainS)的一部分时发现的参与者退学的可行性和风险因素。目的:本研究使用来自web-LABrainS的402名参与者的数据,以确定使用自我引导、远程和基于网络的平台作为对社区居住的老年人进行纵向研究的基础的可行性。此外,我们试图确定与web-LABrainS参与者在12个月期间辍学相关的危险因素,并确定在临床纵向研究中是否观察到与web-LABrainS辍学相关的相同危险因素。方法:参与者被登记在网络labrains在滚动的基础上使用口头宣传的努力。参与者使用web-LABrainS平台提供电子同意、人口统计和健康信息、回答问卷并完成评估,作为诊所场外(远程)自我指导和基于网络的工作的一部分。在完成基线测试后,每6个月通过电子邮件与参与者联系,以完成另一轮web-LABrainS测试。本研究的数据来自402名参与者,其中217名(54.0%)完成了基线、6个月和12个月的评估(坚持参与者),185名(46%)只参加了基线测试,没有后续的web-LABrainS测试(退出参与者)。结果:我们的研究表明,即使参与者的外展和保留努力有限,使用自我指导、远程和基于网络的方法在社区居住的oa中进行纵向临床研究是可行的。与传统的临床纵向研究相比,web-LABrainS的退出在年龄、教育程度、性别、婚姻状况或独居方面没有观察到显著差异(P= 0.67, P= 0.67)。16日。29日。051年。31)。与传统的纵向研究类似,web-LABrainS的辍学者显著增加了抑郁症药物的使用,自我报告的行动能力下降,延迟回忆能力下降(P=.007,。007年,04)。有趣的是,在技术使用、技术舒适度、评估时间或同意就未来研究进行联系方面,坚持者和退出者之间没有观察到差异(P= 0.17, P= 0.17)。36岁。47岁的.40)。预测性二元逻辑回归得到了一个中等准确的模型,并进一步支持认知能力与辍学之间的负相关(OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.96)。结论:我们的研究为使用自我引导、远程和基于网络的方法进行纵向人体研究的可行性提供了一些初步的临床证据。此外,与传统的纵向研究形式相比,这些数据突出了使用这种方法与参与者退学相关的关键因素的异同。这项研究的发现可能有助于指导未来老年人纵向研究的设计和部署,这些研究主要集中在自我指导、远程或基于网络的方法上。
{"title":"Risk Factors for Community-Dwelling Older Adults Dropping Out of Self-Guided, Remote, and Web-Based Longitudinal Research: Predictive Modeling of Data from the Web-LABrainS Platform.","authors":"Luke Daniel Braun, H Raymond Allen, Jeffrey N Keller","doi":"10.2196/68826","DOIUrl":"10.2196/68826","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Little is currently known regarding the feasibility of using a self-guided, remote, web-based platform as the basis for a longitudinal study of aging in community-dwelling older adults (OAs). This study describes the feasibility and risk factors for participant dropout found when using this approach as part of the web-based Louisiana Aging Brain Study (web-LABrainS).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;This study used data from 402 participants in the web-LABrainS effort to determine the feasibility of using a self-guided, remote, and web-based platform as the basis for conducting longitudinal research in community-dwelling older adults. Additionally, we sought to determine the risk factors associated with participant dropout over a 12-month period in web-LABrainS and determine whether the same risk factors associated with dropout from in-clinic longitudinal studies were observed in web-LABrainS dropouts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Participants were enrolled in web-LABrainS on a rolling basis using word-of-mouth promotional efforts. Participants used the web-LABrainS platform to provide electronic consent, demographic and health information, answer questionnaires, and complete assessments as part of a self-guided and web-based effort off-site of the clinic (remote). Following completion of the baseline battery, participants were contacted by email every 6 months to complete another round of the web-LABrainS battery. The data in this study were collected from 402 participants, 217 (54.0%) of whom completed baseline, 6-month, and 12-month assessments (adherent participants) and 185 (46%) of whom participated in only the baseline and no subsequent web-LABrainS batteries (dropout participants).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Our study indicates that even with limited participant outreach and retention efforts, it is feasible to conduct longitudinal clinical research studies in community-dwelling OAs using a self-guided, remote, and web-based approach. In contrast to traditional in-clinic longitudinal studies, dropouts from web-LABrainS were not observed to be significantly different with respect to age, education, gender, marital status, or living alone (P=.67, .16, .29, .051, .31). Similar to traditional longitudinal studies, dropouts from web-LABrainS had significantly higher use of depression medication, decreased self-reported mobility, and decreased delayed recall performance (P=.007, .007, .004). Interestingly, no differences in technology use, comfort with technology, time of assessment, or consent to be contacted about future research were observed between adherents and dropouts (P=.17, .36, .47, .40). Predictive binary logistic regression yielded a moderately accurate model and further supported a negative association between cognitive ability and dropout (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.96).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Our study provides some of the first clinical evidence for the feasibility of conducting","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e68826"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12617459/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145524449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Voice-Based Remote Care Program for Vulnerable Older Adults in a Rural Community: Single-Arm Pilot Clinical Study. 农村社区弱势老年人语音远程护理项目:单臂临床试验研究。
IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.2196/76653
Geon Young Jang, Sunghwan Ji, Ji Yeon Baek, Eunju Lee, Seungryong Chong, Il-Young Jang

Background: Voice-based digital health technologies are highly feasible and acceptable tools for supporting older adults. However, their development has rarely focused on caregiving needs, and it is often poorly integrated with existing care services, thereby limiting their sustained effect.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a comprehensive voice-based remote care program developed in partnership with a local public health center.

Methods: A single-center, single-arm clinical study involving community-dwelling, socioeconomically vulnerable older adults was conducted using a Clinical Frailty Scale of 4-5. Participants received a 6-month voice-based care program comprising smart speaker daily check-ins, an emergency response system, and artificial intelligence-driven well-being check calls. These components were integrated with the public health center for continuous monitoring. The primary outcome was caregiver burden, assessed using the Korean version of the Zarit Burden Interview. Secondary outcomes include depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and quality of life (Korean version of the Control, Autonomy, Self-realization, and Pleasure scale).

Results: Among 100 enrolled participants, 96 (96%) completed the program. The caregiver burden slightly decreased from 17.1-16.2 points (mean difference -1, 95% CI -2.17 to 0.24; P=.12). However, caregivers reported a significant reduction in their perception of being the sole support provider (P=.003). Among older adults, significant improvements were observed in depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; P<.001), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7; P=.008), and quality of life (Korean version of the Control, Autonomy, Self-Realization, and Pleasure scale; P =.048).. Program adherence was high, with participants engaging for a median of 184 (IQR 154-203; 186/214, 87%) days.

Conclusions: Whereas the voice-based remote care program did not significantly reduce the overall caregiver burden, it significantly reduced the perception of the caregivers as being the sole support system. Furthermore, it influenced the psychological well-being of older adults by reducing depression and anxiety and enhancing their quality of life. High adherence and engagement enhance the feasibility and acceptability of scalable digital health interventions for vulnerable older adults in rural settings.

背景:基于语音的数字健康技术是支持老年人的高度可行和可接受的工具。然而,它们的发展很少侧重于护理需求,而且往往与现有护理服务结合不佳,从而限制了它们的持续效果。目的:本研究旨在评估与当地公共卫生中心合作开发的基于语音的综合远程护理计划的可行性和有效性。方法:采用临床虚弱量表4-5进行单中心、单臂临床研究,纳入社区居住、社会经济脆弱的老年人。参与者接受了为期6个月的语音护理计划,包括智能扬声器每日检查,紧急响应系统和人工智能驱动的健康检查电话。这些组成部分与公共卫生中心集成,以进行持续监测。主要结果是护理者负担,使用韩国版的Zarit负担访谈进行评估。次要结果包括抑郁(患者健康问卷-9)、焦虑(广泛性焦虑障碍-7)和生活质量(韩国版控制、自主、自我实现和快乐量表)。结果:在100名参与者中,96名(96%)完成了该计划。照顾者负担从17.1-16.2分略有下降(平均差值-1,95% CI -2.17至0.24;P= 0.12)。然而,照护者报告说,他们作为唯一支持提供者的感觉显著降低(P= 0.003)。结论:尽管基于语音的远程护理计划并没有显著减轻照顾者的整体负担,但它显著降低了照顾者作为唯一支持系统的感觉。此外,它还影响老年人的心理健康,减少抑郁和焦虑,提高他们的生活质量。高依从性和参与度提高了农村脆弱老年人可扩展数字卫生干预措施的可行性和可接受性。
{"title":"Voice-Based Remote Care Program for Vulnerable Older Adults in a Rural Community: Single-Arm Pilot Clinical Study.","authors":"Geon Young Jang, Sunghwan Ji, Ji Yeon Baek, Eunju Lee, Seungryong Chong, Il-Young Jang","doi":"10.2196/76653","DOIUrl":"10.2196/76653","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Voice-based digital health technologies are highly feasible and acceptable tools for supporting older adults. However, their development has rarely focused on caregiving needs, and it is often poorly integrated with existing care services, thereby limiting their sustained effect.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a comprehensive voice-based remote care program developed in partnership with a local public health center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, single-arm clinical study involving community-dwelling, socioeconomically vulnerable older adults was conducted using a Clinical Frailty Scale of 4-5. Participants received a 6-month voice-based care program comprising smart speaker daily check-ins, an emergency response system, and artificial intelligence-driven well-being check calls. These components were integrated with the public health center for continuous monitoring. The primary outcome was caregiver burden, assessed using the Korean version of the Zarit Burden Interview. Secondary outcomes include depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and quality of life (Korean version of the Control, Autonomy, Self-realization, and Pleasure scale).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 100 enrolled participants, 96 (96%) completed the program. The caregiver burden slightly decreased from 17.1-16.2 points (mean difference -1, 95% CI -2.17 to 0.24; P=.12). However, caregivers reported a significant reduction in their perception of being the sole support provider (P=.003). Among older adults, significant improvements were observed in depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; P<.001), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7; P=.008), and quality of life (Korean version of the Control, Autonomy, Self-Realization, and Pleasure scale; P =.048).. Program adherence was high, with participants engaging for a median of 184 (IQR 154-203; 186/214, 87%) days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Whereas the voice-based remote care program did not significantly reduce the overall caregiver burden, it significantly reduced the perception of the caregivers as being the sole support system. Furthermore, it influenced the psychological well-being of older adults by reducing depression and anxiety and enhancing their quality of life. High adherence and engagement enhance the feasibility and acceptability of scalable digital health interventions for vulnerable older adults in rural settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e76653"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12616100/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145514504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Associations Between Social Media Use and Anxiety and Depression Among Older Adults : Cross-Sectional Study. 社交媒体使用与老年人焦虑和抑郁之间的关系:横断面研究。
IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-10 DOI: 10.2196/71712
Jiaoling Huang, Zhenxing Ge, Yijing Chu, Yuge Yan, Wei Zhang, Hong Liang, Yuqi Yang, Hui Wang

Background: Social media engagement among older adults has surged worldwide, with China's older users exceeding 120 million in 2023. However, research remains disproportionately focused on youth. Critically, the dose-response relationship between use intensity and mental health in this population is poorly quantified, especially in rapidly aging societies such as China, where 23% of the population will be aged ≥65 years by 2035.

Objective: This study aimed to outline the social media use status among retired older adults and explore the association between social media use, including time spent on social media and social media addiction, and mental health status.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Shanghai, China, in 2024. A total of 15,986 retired participants were recruited via universities for older adults and primary health care institutions. Short versions of anxiety (the 2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale) and depression (the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire) scales were used to minimize the required time to complete the questionnaires for older adults. Logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between social media use and mental health after controlling for covariates. Subgroup analysis was conducted considering sex, age, marital status, urbanicity, and socioeconomic status.

Results: The participants had an average age of 68.49 (SD 7.6) years, with most (13,854/15,986, 86.7%) being married and living with their spouse and approximately half (8155/15,986, 51.0%) being male. Our research indicated that over 98% of retired older individuals (15,807/15,986, 98.88%) had used social media, with WeChat, Douyin, and Kuaishou being the most common platforms. Among them, 52.3% (8361/15,986) spent 2 to 3 hours a day on social media, 32.29% (5162/15,986) spent >4 hours a day, and 20.34% (3253/15,986) were addicted to social media. Older adults with ≥6 hours of daily social media use time exhibited higher rates of anxiety (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, 95% CI 1.20-1.72; P<.001) and depression (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.25-1.79; P<.001) compared with those who used social media for ≤1 hour per day. Older adults addicted to social media had higher odds of anxiety (OR 2.81, 95% CI 2.57-3.08; P<.001) and depression (OR 2.51, 95% CI 2.30-2.75; P<.001). Subgroup analyses revealed stronger associations for women, people aged 49-75 years, those with a lower educational level and income, urban residents, and non-solo dwellers.

Conclusions: Retired older adults in Shanghai are an active group of social media users. Using social media for over 6 hours a day and social media addiction were significantly associated with anxiety and depression. Future social media research should pay more attention to older adults and explore these longitudinal relationships.

背景:全球老年人的社交媒体参与度激增,到2023年,中国老年用户将超过1.2亿。然而,研究仍然不成比例地集中在年轻人身上。至关重要的是,在这一人群中,使用强度与心理健康之间的剂量-反应关系没有得到很好的量化,特别是在快速老龄化的社会,如中国,到2035年,23%的人口将达到65岁以上。目的:本研究旨在概述退休老年人的社交媒体使用状况,并探讨社交媒体使用(包括社交媒体使用时间和社交媒体成瘾)与心理健康状况之间的关系。方法:于2024年在中国上海进行横断面调查。通过老年人大学和初级保健机构共招募了15 986名退休参与者。使用简短版本的焦虑(2项广泛性焦虑障碍量表)和抑郁(2项患者健康问卷)量表来减少老年人完成问卷所需的时间。在控制协变量后,使用逻辑回归来检验社交媒体使用与心理健康之间的关系。亚组分析考虑性别、年龄、婚姻状况、城市化程度和社会经济地位。结果:参与者的平均年龄为68.49岁(SD 7.6),大多数(13,854/15,986,86.7%)已婚并与配偶同住,约一半(8155/15,986,51.0%)为男性。我们的研究表明,超过98%的退休老年人(15,807/15,986,98.88%)使用过社交媒体,其中b微信、抖音和快手是最常见的平台。其中,52.3%(8361/ 15986)的人每天使用社交媒体的时间为2 - 3小时,32.29%(5162/ 15986)的人每天使用社交媒体的时间为10 - 4小时,20.34%(3253/ 15986)的人对社交媒体上瘾。每天使用社交媒体时间≥6小时的老年人表现出更高的焦虑率(比值比[OR] 1.44, 95% CI 1.20-1.72);结论:上海退休老年人是社交媒体用户的活跃群体。每天使用社交媒体超过6小时和社交媒体成瘾与焦虑和抑郁显著相关。未来的社交媒体研究应该更多地关注老年人,并探索这些纵向关系。
{"title":"Associations Between Social Media Use and Anxiety and Depression Among Older Adults : Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Jiaoling Huang, Zhenxing Ge, Yijing Chu, Yuge Yan, Wei Zhang, Hong Liang, Yuqi Yang, Hui Wang","doi":"10.2196/71712","DOIUrl":"10.2196/71712","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media engagement among older adults has surged worldwide, with China's older users exceeding 120 million in 2023. However, research remains disproportionately focused on youth. Critically, the dose-response relationship between use intensity and mental health in this population is poorly quantified, especially in rapidly aging societies such as China, where 23% of the population will be aged ≥65 years by 2035.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to outline the social media use status among retired older adults and explore the association between social media use, including time spent on social media and social media addiction, and mental health status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Shanghai, China, in 2024. A total of 15,986 retired participants were recruited via universities for older adults and primary health care institutions. Short versions of anxiety (the 2-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale) and depression (the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire) scales were used to minimize the required time to complete the questionnaires for older adults. Logistic regressions were used to examine the associations between social media use and mental health after controlling for covariates. Subgroup analysis was conducted considering sex, age, marital status, urbanicity, and socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants had an average age of 68.49 (SD 7.6) years, with most (13,854/15,986, 86.7%) being married and living with their spouse and approximately half (8155/15,986, 51.0%) being male. Our research indicated that over 98% of retired older individuals (15,807/15,986, 98.88%) had used social media, with WeChat, Douyin, and Kuaishou being the most common platforms. Among them, 52.3% (8361/15,986) spent 2 to 3 hours a day on social media, 32.29% (5162/15,986) spent >4 hours a day, and 20.34% (3253/15,986) were addicted to social media. Older adults with ≥6 hours of daily social media use time exhibited higher rates of anxiety (odds ratio [OR] 1.44, 95% CI 1.20-1.72; P<.001) and depression (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.25-1.79; P<.001) compared with those who used social media for ≤1 hour per day. Older adults addicted to social media had higher odds of anxiety (OR 2.81, 95% CI 2.57-3.08; P<.001) and depression (OR 2.51, 95% CI 2.30-2.75; P<.001). Subgroup analyses revealed stronger associations for women, people aged 49-75 years, those with a lower educational level and income, urban residents, and non-solo dwellers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Retired older adults in Shanghai are an active group of social media users. Using social media for over 6 hours a day and social media addiction were significantly associated with anxiety and depression. Future social media research should pay more attention to older adults and explore these longitudinal relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e71712"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12603664/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145490409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Sleep Disturbance as a Catalyst in the Cyclical Link Between Depressive Symptoms and Disability in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Older Chinese Adults: Longitudinal Cohort Study. 睡眠障碍是中国老年人日常生活工具活动中抑郁症状与残疾之间周期性联系的催化剂:纵向队列研究
IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-06 DOI: 10.2196/76643
Hao Wu, Lu Wang, Xin Liu, Yuyue Yang, Wei Gao

Background: Depressive symptoms, sleep disturbances, and functional disability are interrelated. However, the bidirectional pathways between depression, sleep disturbances, and disability in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) remain underexplored in China.

Objective: We aimed to examine the bidirectional longitudinal relationships between depression and disability in IADLs among older Chinese adults, with a focus on elucidating the mediating role of sleep disturbances in this dynamic interplay.

Methods: The study encompassed 2677 older adults who provided complete data at T1 (2015), T2 (2018), and T3 (2020) for the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CESD-10) scale, and a 6-item scale was used to measure disability in IADLs. Sleep disturbances were self-reported. Temporal associations between depressive symptoms and disability in IADLs as well as the longitudinal mediating effect of sleep disturbances were examined using a cross-lagged panel model.

Results: Prior depression significantly predicted subsequent disability in IADLs at T2 (β=0.070, P<.001) and T3 (β=0.074, P<.001), and prior disability in IADL predicted subsequent depression at T2 (β=0.094, P<.001) and T3 (β=0.100, P<.001). Additionally, the indirect effect of prior disability in IADLs on subsequent depression via sleep disturbances was statistically significant (β=0.062, SE=0.010, P<.001), with the mediation effect accounting for 50.41% of the total effect. In contrast, after accounting for this mediation, the direct effect of prior depression on subsequent disability in IADLs was not significant (β=0.009, SE=0.018, P=.61). Consequently, the impact of depression on disability in IADLs was fully mediated through sleep disturbances in this cohort of older Chinese adults.

Conclusions: Depressive symptoms and disability in IADLs are bidirectionally linked, and sleep disturbances play a longitudinal mediating role in the bidirectional relationship among older Chinese adults. The potential longitudinal bidirectionality highlights the importance of sleep health for interventions on depression and functional disability in older adults.

背景:抑郁症状、睡眠障碍和功能障碍是相互关联的。然而,在中国,抑郁症、睡眠障碍和日常生活工具活动(IADLs)残疾之间的双向通路仍未得到充分探索。目的:研究中国老年人iadl中抑郁与残疾之间的双向纵向关系,重点阐明睡眠障碍在这种动态相互作用中的中介作用。方法:本研究纳入2677名老年人,他们在中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)的T1(2015)、T2(2018)和T3(2020)提供了完整的数据。采用流行病学研究中心抑郁(csd -10) 10项量表评估抑郁症状,并采用6项量表测量iadl中的残疾。睡眠障碍是自我报告的。使用交叉滞后面板模型检查了iadl中抑郁症状与残疾之间的时间关联以及睡眠障碍的纵向中介效应。结果:既往抑郁显著预测T2时iadl的残疾(β=0.070, p)。结论:中国老年人iadl的抑郁症状与残疾存在双向关联,睡眠障碍在双向关系中起纵向中介作用。潜在的纵向双向性强调了睡眠健康对老年人抑郁症和功能障碍干预的重要性。
{"title":"Sleep Disturbance as a Catalyst in the Cyclical Link Between Depressive Symptoms and Disability in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in Older Chinese Adults: Longitudinal Cohort Study.","authors":"Hao Wu, Lu Wang, Xin Liu, Yuyue Yang, Wei Gao","doi":"10.2196/76643","DOIUrl":"10.2196/76643","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depressive symptoms, sleep disturbances, and functional disability are interrelated. However, the bidirectional pathways between depression, sleep disturbances, and disability in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) remain underexplored in China.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to examine the bidirectional longitudinal relationships between depression and disability in IADLs among older Chinese adults, with a focus on elucidating the mediating role of sleep disturbances in this dynamic interplay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study encompassed 2677 older adults who provided complete data at T1 (2015), T2 (2018), and T3 (2020) for the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CESD-10) scale, and a 6-item scale was used to measure disability in IADLs. Sleep disturbances were self-reported. Temporal associations between depressive symptoms and disability in IADLs as well as the longitudinal mediating effect of sleep disturbances were examined using a cross-lagged panel model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior depression significantly predicted subsequent disability in IADLs at T2 (β=0.070, P<.001) and T3 (β=0.074, P<.001), and prior disability in IADL predicted subsequent depression at T2 (β=0.094, P<.001) and T3 (β=0.100, P<.001). Additionally, the indirect effect of prior disability in IADLs on subsequent depression via sleep disturbances was statistically significant (β=0.062, SE=0.010, P<.001), with the mediation effect accounting for 50.41% of the total effect. In contrast, after accounting for this mediation, the direct effect of prior depression on subsequent disability in IADLs was not significant (β=0.009, SE=0.018, P=.61). Consequently, the impact of depression on disability in IADLs was fully mediated through sleep disturbances in this cohort of older Chinese adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depressive symptoms and disability in IADLs are bidirectionally linked, and sleep disturbances play a longitudinal mediating role in the bidirectional relationship among older Chinese adults. The potential longitudinal bidirectionality highlights the importance of sleep health for interventions on depression and functional disability in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e76643"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12591558/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145460127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Aesthetic Experience in the Acceptance of Wearable Technology for People With Dementia: Critical Interpretive Synthesis. 痴呆症患者接受可穿戴技术的审美体验:批判性的解释性综合。
IF 4.8 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-06 DOI: 10.2196/72082
Yixuan Wei, John Ratcliffe, Dag Aarsland, Wei Liu

Background: The prevalence of dementia has led to a growing interest in wearable technologies to assist dementia care. Despite their potential, these technologies face low adoption rates, often attributed to poor aesthetic design and insufficient consideration of user experience.

Objective: This study aims to (1) explore how the aesthetic design of wearable devices relates to their adoption and user experience in dementia care and (2) critically examine the ways in which aesthetic elements shape people with dementia's perceptions of acceptability and inform future design considerations.

Methods: A critical interpretive synthesis with a systematic search was conducted across 2 databases, namely Web of Science and Scopus on August 22, 2024. Studies were included if they reported on the current use of wearable technologies in dementia care or provided value in qualitative studies addressing attitudes from people with dementia and their caregivers toward the wearable product. Two authors independently screened the abstracts and full texts to extract data, and additional studies were included from web searches, owing to their conceptual contributions to offering insights into the emergence of wearable technology, including the factors driving its commercial value and appraisal.

Results: A total of 63 studies were included in this study. Findings suggest that aesthetically considered designs are preferred by users when concerning their acceptance toward wearable devices, particularly when devices symbolize empowerment and support personal engagement. The objects that evoke comfort, emotional connection, and personal meaning are more likely to be accepted by people with dementia. Improved aesthetics may also support caregivers through more consistent and effective data collection.

Conclusions: This study uncovers a significant gap in the aesthetic design of wearable technologies for dementia care, limiting user acceptance and emotional engagement. By synthesizing key themes focusing on the interaction between user and product, this review proposes a conceptual framework for dementia care, emphasizing the importance of aesthetics in enabling more meaningful, inclusive, and human-centered design.

背景:痴呆症的流行导致人们对辅助痴呆症护理的可穿戴技术越来越感兴趣。尽管有潜力,但这些技术的采用率很低,通常归因于糟糕的美学设计和对用户体验的考虑不足。目的:本研究旨在(1)探索可穿戴设备的美学设计与痴呆症护理中的采用和用户体验之间的关系;(2)批判性地研究美学元素如何塑造痴呆症患者对可接受性的感知,并为未来的设计考虑提供信息。方法:于2024年8月22日对Web of Science和Scopus两个数据库进行系统检索,并进行批判性的解释性综合。如果研究报告了可穿戴技术在痴呆症护理中的当前使用情况,或者在定性研究中提供了价值,解决了痴呆症患者及其护理人员对可穿戴产品的态度,则将其纳入研究。两位作者独立筛选摘要和全文以提取数据,并从网络搜索中纳入其他研究,因为他们在概念上的贡献提供了对可穿戴技术出现的见解,包括推动其商业价值和评估的因素。结果:本研究共纳入63项研究。研究结果表明,当用户接受可穿戴设备时,尤其是当设备象征着授权和支持个人参与时,美学考虑的设计更受用户青睐。那些能唤起舒适感、情感联系和个人意义的物品更容易被痴呆症患者接受。改进的美学也可以通过更一致和有效的数据收集来支持护理人员。结论:本研究揭示了用于痴呆症护理的可穿戴技术的美学设计存在重大差距,限制了用户的接受度和情感参与。通过综合关注用户和产品之间交互的关键主题,本文提出了痴呆症护理的概念框架,强调美学在实现更有意义、包容性和以人为本的设计中的重要性。
{"title":"Aesthetic Experience in the Acceptance of Wearable Technology for People With Dementia: Critical Interpretive Synthesis.","authors":"Yixuan Wei, John Ratcliffe, Dag Aarsland, Wei Liu","doi":"10.2196/72082","DOIUrl":"10.2196/72082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of dementia has led to a growing interest in wearable technologies to assist dementia care. Despite their potential, these technologies face low adoption rates, often attributed to poor aesthetic design and insufficient consideration of user experience.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to (1) explore how the aesthetic design of wearable devices relates to their adoption and user experience in dementia care and (2) critically examine the ways in which aesthetic elements shape people with dementia's perceptions of acceptability and inform future design considerations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A critical interpretive synthesis with a systematic search was conducted across 2 databases, namely Web of Science and Scopus on August 22, 2024. Studies were included if they reported on the current use of wearable technologies in dementia care or provided value in qualitative studies addressing attitudes from people with dementia and their caregivers toward the wearable product. Two authors independently screened the abstracts and full texts to extract data, and additional studies were included from web searches, owing to their conceptual contributions to offering insights into the emergence of wearable technology, including the factors driving its commercial value and appraisal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 63 studies were included in this study. Findings suggest that aesthetically considered designs are preferred by users when concerning their acceptance toward wearable devices, particularly when devices symbolize empowerment and support personal engagement. The objects that evoke comfort, emotional connection, and personal meaning are more likely to be accepted by people with dementia. Improved aesthetics may also support caregivers through more consistent and effective data collection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study uncovers a significant gap in the aesthetic design of wearable technologies for dementia care, limiting user acceptance and emotional engagement. By synthesizing key themes focusing on the interaction between user and product, this review proposes a conceptual framework for dementia care, emphasizing the importance of aesthetics in enabling more meaningful, inclusive, and human-centered design.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"8 ","pages":"e72082"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12591609/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145460147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
JMIR Aging
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1