Pub Date : 2023-11-25DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100225
Iris Bronsema , Luc van Lonkhuijzen , Peter Scholten , Janna Laan , Henrike Westerveld , Lukas Stalpers
Objective
Continuation of smoking after a cancer diagnosis increases the burdensome side effects from cancer treatment, and decreases the chances of cure. Smoking cessation may improve oncological outcomes in cancer patients. This study aims to evaluate if radiation oncologists can be motivated by a smoking cessation awareness intervention to discuss smoking status more frequently and increase the referral rate for smoking cessation-support.
Study design and Setting:
A multifaceted approach was used to improve awareness: First, current practice was evaluated by a retrospective chart review of 282 patients referred for radiotherapy to ascertain smoking status, discussion of smoking cessation support and referral rates. Secondly, radiation oncologists were interviewed about their motives and barriers to discuss smoking status and smoking cessation support. The results were fed back in a teaching lecture to the doctors involved. Finally, the effect of this smoking cessation awareness intervention was prospectively evaluated in 100 patients.
Results
After the smoking cessation awareness intervention, smoking cessation was more frequently discussed compared to baseline (77% (10/13)) and 39.5% (17/43) respectively. The referral rate for smoking cessation increased from 2.3% (1/43) to 69.2% (9/13)
Conclusion
Without an active smoking prevention awareness policy, referral for smoking cessation support for cancer patients by radiation oncologists is low. A relatively short and simple smoking awareness intervention for radiation oncologist may result in a more frequent discussion with patients about smoking cessation and an even larger increase in referrals for smoking cessation support.
{"title":"Improving referral rates for smoking cessation: A multifaceted intervention aimed at radiation oncologists","authors":"Iris Bronsema , Luc van Lonkhuijzen , Peter Scholten , Janna Laan , Henrike Westerveld , Lukas Stalpers","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100225","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100225","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Continuation of smoking after a cancer diagnosis increases the burdensome side effects from cancer treatment, and decreases the chances of cure. Smoking cessation may improve oncological outcomes in cancer patients. This study aims to evaluate if radiation oncologists can be motivated by a smoking cessation awareness intervention to discuss smoking status more frequently and increase the referral rate for smoking cessation-support.</p><p>Study design and Setting:</p><p>A multifaceted approach was used to improve awareness: First, current practice was evaluated by a retrospective chart review of 282 patients referred for radiotherapy to ascertain smoking status, discussion of smoking cessation support and referral rates. Secondly, radiation oncologists were interviewed about their motives and barriers to discuss smoking status and smoking cessation support. The results were fed back in a teaching lecture to the doctors involved. Finally, the effect of this smoking cessation awareness intervention was prospectively evaluated in 100 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After the smoking cessation awareness intervention, smoking cessation was more frequently discussed compared to baseline (77% (10/13)) and 39.5% (17/43) respectively. The referral rate for smoking cessation increased from 2.3% (1/43) to 69.2% (9/13)</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Without an active smoking prevention awareness policy, referral for smoking cessation support for cancer patients by radiation oncologists is low. A relatively short and simple smoking awareness intervention for radiation oncologist may result in a more frequent discussion with patients about smoking cessation and an even larger increase in referrals for smoking cessation support.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632423000252/pdfft?md5=4b0b79957d025903f572c8fdb1fe58f1&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632423000252-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138678335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-25DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100224
S.R. de Mol van Otterloo , J.M. Westerhoff , T. Leer , R.H.A. Rutgers , L.T.C. Meijers , L.A. Daamen , M.P.W. Intven , H.M. Verkooijen
Background and Purpose
Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a relatively new form of radiotherapy treatment, delivered using a MR-Linac. It is unknown what patients expect from this treatment and whether these expectations are met. This study evaluates whether patients’ pre-treatment expectations of MRgRT are met and reports patients’ on-table experience on a 1.5 T MR-Linac.
Materials and methods
All patients treated on the MR-Linac from November 2020 until April 2021, were eligible for inclusion. Patient expectation and experience were captured through questionnaires before, during, and three months after treatment. The on-table experience questionnaire included patient’ physical and psychological coping. Patient-expected side effects, participation in daily and social activity, disease outcome and, disease related symptoms were compared to post-treatment experience.
Results
We included 113 patients who were primarily male (n = 100, 89 %), with a median age of 69 years (range 52–90). For on-table experience, ninety percent of patients (strongly) agreed to feeling calm during their treatment. Six and eight percent of patients found the treatment position or bed uncomfortable respectively. Twenty-eight percent of patients felt tingling sensations during treatment. After treatment, 79 % of patients’ expectations were met. Most patients experienced an (better than) expected level of side effects (75 %), participation in daily- (83 %) and social activity (86 %) and symptoms (78 %). However, 33 % expected more treatment efficacy than experienced.
Conclusion
Treatment on the 1.5 T MR-Linac is well tolerated and meets patient expectations. Despite the fact that some patients expected greater treatment efficacy and the frequent occurrence of tingling sensations during treatment, most patient experiences were comparable or better than previously expected.
{"title":"Patient expectation and experience of MR-guided radiotherapy using a 1.5T MR-Linac","authors":"S.R. de Mol van Otterloo , J.M. Westerhoff , T. Leer , R.H.A. Rutgers , L.T.C. Meijers , L.A. Daamen , M.P.W. Intven , H.M. Verkooijen","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100224","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a relatively new form of radiotherapy treatment, delivered using a MR-Linac. It is unknown what patients expect from this treatment and whether these expectations are met. This study evaluates whether patients’ pre-treatment expectations of MRgRT are met and reports patients’ on-table experience on a 1.5 T MR-Linac.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>All patients treated on the MR-Linac from November 2020 until April 2021, were eligible for inclusion. Patient expectation and experience were captured through questionnaires before, during, and three months after treatment. The on-table experience questionnaire included patient’ physical and psychological coping. Patient-expected side effects, participation in daily and social activity, disease outcome and, disease related symptoms were compared to post-treatment experience.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 113 patients who were primarily male (n = 100, 89 %), with a median age of 69 years (range 52–90). For on-table experience, ninety percent of patients (strongly) agreed to feeling calm during their treatment. Six and eight percent of patients found the treatment position or bed uncomfortable respectively. Twenty-eight percent of patients felt tingling sensations during treatment. After treatment, 79 % of patients’ expectations were met. Most patients experienced an (better than) expected level of side effects (75 %), participation in daily- (83 %) and social activity (86 %) and symptoms (78 %). However, 33 % expected more treatment efficacy than experienced.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Treatment on the 1.5 T MR-Linac is well tolerated and meets patient expectations. Despite the fact that some patients expected greater treatment efficacy and the frequent occurrence of tingling sensations during treatment, most patient experiences were comparable or better than previously expected.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632423000240/pdfft?md5=b9079f66d3a5754664a706af43d1b2c8&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632423000240-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138558647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-11-23DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100223
Menekse Turna, Esra Küçükmorkoç, Rashad Rzazade, Mehmet Doğu Canoğlu, Nadir Küçük, Hale Basak Caglar
Purpose
Intrafractional motion constitutes a significant challenge in SBRT (Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy).The breath-hold (BH) technique is employed to mitigate tumor motion; however, ensuring reproducibility and consistency remains critically important. Surface tracking systems, integrated into the treatment process, facilitate motion tracking through three-dimensional camera technology. Surface guidance has been incorporated with Varian EDGE (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and has been utilized at multiple treatment sites within our department since 2018. Drawing on four years of experience, this study aims to publish patient experience, assess the feasibility, and evaluate the tolerability of breath-hold during SBRT with surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT), particularly focusing on a specific subgroup: patients with liver metastases.
Methods
Prospective evaluation was conducted on patients with liver metastases undergoing breath-hold SBRT with SGRT. A two-step survey consisting of seven questions was administered after CT simulation and treatment. Treatment duration and the number of breath-holds were recorded. Additionally, factors potentially influencing SGRT and treatment time were assessed.
Results
Between April 2021 and May 2022, a total of 41 patients underwent 171 fractions of treatment. According to the questionnaire, prior training was found to be beneficial, and breath-holding during the procedure was tolerable. Patients reported experiencing slight stress due to their active participation in the treatment. Factors such as Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), age, lung volume, conditions affecting lung capacity, previous breath-hold history, and being a native speaker showed no correlation with treatment time. Moreover, these factors did not correlate with the tolerability of breath-hold during SGRT. However, female patients showed better breath-holding performance in SGRT treatments compared to male patients (p: 0.02).
Conclusions
The application of breath-hold with SGRT procedures is tolerable and feasible in liver SBRT treatments. There exists no specific subgroup that cannot tolerate this method.
目的:在立体定向放射治疗中,病灶内运动是一个重大的挑战。采用屏气(BH)技术缓解肿瘤运动;然而,确保可重复性和一致性仍然至关重要。表面跟踪系统,集成到处理过程中,便于通过三维相机技术进行运动跟踪。表面引导已与Varian EDGE (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA)结合,自2018年以来已在我们部门的多个治疗地点使用。基于四年的经验,本研究旨在发表患者经验,评估SBRT联合表面引导放疗(SGRT)期间屏气的可行性,并评估其耐受性,特别关注一个特定的亚组:肝转移患者。方法对肝转移患者行屏气SBRT联合SGRT进行前瞻性评价。在CT模拟和治疗后进行了包括七个问题的两步调查。记录治疗时间和屏气次数。此外,还评估了可能影响SGRT和治疗时间的因素。结果在2021年4月至2022年5月期间,共有41名患者接受了171次治疗。根据问卷调查,先前的训练被发现是有益的,在手术过程中屏气是可以容忍的。患者报告说,由于他们积极参与治疗,他们感到轻微的压力。Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)、年龄、肺容量、影响肺活量的条件、以前的屏气史、是否是母语者等因素与治疗时间没有相关性。此外,这些因素与SGRT期间的屏气耐受性无关。然而,与男性患者相比,女性患者在SGRT治疗中表现出更好的屏气性能(p: 0.02)。结论在肝脏SBRT治疗中应用屏气联合SGRT是可耐受的、可行的。不存在不能容忍这种方法的特定子组。
{"title":"Feasibility and tolerability of breath-hold in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy with surface guided radiotherapy","authors":"Menekse Turna, Esra Küçükmorkoç, Rashad Rzazade, Mehmet Doğu Canoğlu, Nadir Küçük, Hale Basak Caglar","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100223","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Intrafractional motion constitutes a significant challenge in SBRT (Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy).The breath-hold (BH) technique is employed to mitigate tumor motion; however, ensuring reproducibility and consistency remains critically important. Surface tracking systems, integrated into the treatment process, facilitate motion tracking through three-dimensional camera technology. Surface guidance has been incorporated with Varian EDGE (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and has been utilized at multiple treatment sites within our department since 2018. Drawing on four years of experience, this study aims to publish patient experience, assess the feasibility, and evaluate the tolerability of breath-hold during SBRT with surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT), particularly focusing on a specific subgroup: patients with liver metastases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Prospective evaluation was conducted on patients with liver metastases undergoing breath-hold SBRT with SGRT. A two-step survey consisting of seven questions was administered after CT simulation and treatment. Treatment duration and the number of breath-holds were recorded. Additionally, factors potentially influencing SGRT and treatment time were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between April 2021 and May 2022, a total of 41 patients underwent 171 fractions of treatment. According to the questionnaire, prior training was found to be beneficial, and breath-holding during the procedure was tolerable. Patients reported experiencing slight stress due to their active participation in the treatment. Factors such as Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), age, lung volume, conditions affecting lung capacity, previous breath-hold history, and being a native speaker showed no correlation with treatment time. Moreover, these factors did not correlate with the tolerability of breath-hold during SGRT. However, female patients showed better breath-holding performance in SGRT treatments compared to male patients (p: 0.02).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The application of breath-hold with SGRT procedures is tolerable and feasible in liver SBRT treatments. There exists no specific subgroup that cannot tolerate this method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632423000239/pdfft?md5=61baca190cdcef7749f12984661667f3&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632423000239-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138453823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A female patient in her 50 s was found to have a 10-cm tumor resulting from locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Three-year relapse-free survival was achieved following a multimodal treatment strategy integrating chemoradiotherapy (CRT), regional hyperthermia (RHT), and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT). Given the large size of the tumor, enhancement of the geometrical dose distribution was anticipated using ISBT. However, delivery of a sufficient dose to the high-risk clinical target volume was predicted to be challenging. Thus, RHT was incorporated to potentially augment the overall treatment effect. This unique combination of CRT, RHT and ISBT may be promising for management of large LACC and warrants further investigation.
{"title":"Multimodal treatment with chemoradiotherapy, regional hyperthermia and interstitial brachytherapy for a huge locally advanced cervical cancer: A case report","authors":"Takashi Saito , Motohiro Murakami , Taisuke Sumiya , Daisuke Kobayashi , Haruka Shirataki , Den Fujioka , Keiichiro Baba , Hiroya Itagaki , Yuri Tenjimbayashi , Toyomi Satoh , Hideyuki Sakurai","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100222","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A female patient in her 50 s was found to have a 10-cm tumor resulting from locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Three-year relapse-free survival was achieved following a multimodal treatment strategy integrating chemoradiotherapy (CRT), regional hyperthermia (RHT), and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT). Given the large size of the tumor, enhancement of the geometrical dose distribution was anticipated using ISBT. However, delivery of a sufficient dose to the high-risk clinical target volume was predicted to be challenging. Thus, RHT was incorporated to potentially augment the overall treatment effect. This unique combination of CRT, RHT and ISBT may be promising for management of large LACC and warrants further investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article 100222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632423000227/pdfft?md5=d5e62e8806cdab719d2f44f9cfc95490&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632423000227-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138395503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}