Pub Date : 2020-06-15DOI: 10.1515/9781501749728-009
D. Ostrowski
{"title":"6. Who Wrote Shakespeare?","authors":"D. Ostrowski","doi":"10.1515/9781501749728-009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501749728-009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":364483,"journal":{"name":"Who Wrote That?","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128641484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-15DOI: 10.1515/9781501749728-002
{"title":"List of Tables","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9781501749728-002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501749728-002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":364483,"journal":{"name":"Who Wrote That?","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130527432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-15DOI: 10.1515/9781501749728-011
{"title":"8. How Inauthentic Was James Macpherson’s “Translation” of Ossian?","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9781501749728-011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501749728-011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":364483,"journal":{"name":"Who Wrote That?","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130254723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-15DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0004
This chapter begins with a brief introduction to New Testament studies. It explains how the four Gospels of the New Testament: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John have an intertwined textual relationship to each other. It tries to analyze where the writers of Matthew and Luke got the in-common verses if they did not get them from Mark or from one another book. The chapter looks into the Church father Clement's opinion that Mark did not write down all the things that Jesus taught but only those teachings of Jesus that he thought would be helpful for the initiates into the “forbidden sanctuary.” It also mentions Morton Smith, a professor of ancient history at Columbia University, who pointed out that the location in the narrative of Mark coincides with the location of the Lazarus story in John in relation to the itinerary of Jesus's ministry.
{"title":"Who Wrote the Secret Gospel of Mark?","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0004","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter begins with a brief introduction to New Testament studies. It explains how the four Gospels of the New Testament: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John have an intertwined textual relationship to each other. It tries to analyze where the writers of Matthew and Luke got the in-common verses if they did not get them from Mark or from one another book. The chapter looks into the Church father Clement's opinion that Mark did not write down all the things that Jesus taught but only those teachings of Jesus that he thought would be helpful for the initiates into the “forbidden sanctuary.” It also mentions Morton Smith, a professor of ancient history at Columbia University, who pointed out that the location in the narrative of Mark coincides with the location of the Lazarus story in John in relation to the itinerary of Jesus's ministry.","PeriodicalId":364483,"journal":{"name":"Who Wrote That?","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125077065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-15DOI: 10.1515/9781501749728-007
{"title":"4. Did Abelard and Heloise Write the Letters Attributed to Them?","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9781501749728-007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501749728-007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":364483,"journal":{"name":"Who Wrote That?","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133270147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-15DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0008
This chapter discusses Prince Andrei Mikhailovich Kurbskii, who was one of Russia's top military leaders and took part in the conquest of Kazan' in 1552. It explains Kurbskii's fame on engaging in an exchange of letters with Ivan IV in the second half of the sixteenth century, which he supposedly wrote after he defected. The chapter talks about Edward L. Keenan, a Harvard University professor of Russian history, who challenged the accepted attribution of Kurbskii's letters to Ivan IV and questioned their basic literacy. It highlights how Keenan wrote three articles in response to critics, only slightly altering his views to be even more sceptical that Kurbskii composed or translated anything.
这一章讨论了安德烈·米哈伊洛维奇·库尔布斯基王子，他是俄罗斯最高军事领导人之一，参加了1552年对喀山的征服。这解释了库尔布斯基在16世纪下半叶与伊凡四世的书信往来而出名的原因，据说这封信是他叛逃后写的。这一章谈到了哈佛大学(Harvard University)俄罗斯历史教授爱德华·l·基南(Edward L. Keenan)，他对将库尔布斯基的信件归为伊凡四世的公认观点提出了质疑，并质疑这些信件的基本读写能力。它强调了基南如何写了三篇文章来回应批评，只是稍微改变了他的观点，更加怀疑库尔布斯基是否创作或翻译了任何东西。
{"title":"Who Wrote the Works Attributed to Prince Andrei Kurbskii?","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0008","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses Prince Andrei Mikhailovich Kurbskii, who was one of Russia's top military leaders and took part in the conquest of Kazan' in 1552. It explains Kurbskii's fame on engaging in an exchange of letters with Ivan IV in the second half of the sixteenth century, which he supposedly wrote after he defected. The chapter talks about Edward L. Keenan, a Harvard University professor of Russian history, who challenged the accepted attribution of Kurbskii's letters to Ivan IV and questioned their basic literacy. It highlights how Keenan wrote three articles in response to critics, only slightly altering his views to be even more sceptical that Kurbskii composed or translated anything.","PeriodicalId":364483,"journal":{"name":"Who Wrote That?","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131519699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-15DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0002
This chapter analyzes the consensus view of biblical scholars that Moses wrote the Pentateuch. It explains that the Pentateuch is the first five books of the Hebrew Bible and the Christian Old Testament. It also mentions the Church father Jerome's suggestion that Ezra the Priest wrote the Pentateuch in the fifth century BC based on notes made by Moses. The chapter explains that since the sixth century AD, doubts have been expressed about whether Moses was the author of all the Pentateuch. But it was only in the mid-seventeenth century that the first relatively systematic discussion of the issue appeared and by the late nineteenth century, the scholarly consensus began to turn against Moses being the author of any part of the Pentateuch.
{"title":"Did Moses Write the Pentateuch?","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyzes the consensus view of biblical scholars that Moses wrote the Pentateuch. It explains that the Pentateuch is the first five books of the Hebrew Bible and the Christian Old Testament. It also mentions the Church father Jerome's suggestion that Ezra the Priest wrote the Pentateuch in the fifth century BC based on notes made by Moses. The chapter explains that since the sixth century AD, doubts have been expressed about whether Moses was the author of all the Pentateuch. But it was only in the mid-seventeenth century that the first relatively systematic discussion of the issue appeared and by the late nineteenth century, the scholarly consensus began to turn against Moses being the author of any part of the Pentateuch.","PeriodicalId":364483,"journal":{"name":"Who Wrote That?","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133002442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-15DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0007
J. Michell
This chapter concentrates on the Shakespeare authorship controversy. It examines the correlation between the literary persona that is the author of the Shakespearean corpus with the historical persona that is William of Stratford. It also talks about the English schoolteacher named J. Thomas Looney, who created a profile of the author of the Shakespearean corpus based on the contents of the plays and poetry. The chapter looks into Looney's proposal that Edward de Vere is the author of the Shakespearean corpus. It also discusses the “New Criticism,” which is an approach to literature that intentionally ignores authorship or authorial intent as well as social and cultural context in favor of deep readings of the text and an aesthetic appreciation of its structure and perceived meaning.
{"title":"Who Wrote Shakespeare?","authors":"J. Michell","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter concentrates on the Shakespeare authorship controversy. It examines the correlation between the literary persona that is the author of the Shakespearean corpus with the historical persona that is William of Stratford. It also talks about the English schoolteacher named J. Thomas Looney, who created a profile of the author of the Shakespearean corpus based on the contents of the plays and poetry. The chapter looks into Looney's proposal that Edward de Vere is the author of the Shakespearean corpus. It also discusses the “New Criticism,” which is an approach to literature that intentionally ignores authorship or authorial intent as well as social and cultural context in favor of deep readings of the text and an aesthetic appreciation of its structure and perceived meaning.","PeriodicalId":364483,"journal":{"name":"Who Wrote That?","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134639619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-06-15DOI: 10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0006
This chapter highlights the Compendium of Chronicles or Jami' al-Tawarikh, which is a three-volume work that John A. Boyle described as “the first world history.” It explains how the Compendium of Chronicles is attributed to the Persian statesman, physician, and historian Rashid al-Din Hamadani. It also looks into the claim of a writer named Abu al-Qasim Abdallah ibn 'Ali Kashani that he was the author of the Compendium of Chronicles. The chapter analyzes the general acceptance among scholars that even if Rashid did not write every word of the Compendium of Chronicles, the entire work was at least accomplished under his direction. It discusses how the scholars' have hypothesized that Kashani was one of those writers who worked under Rashid's direction.
{"title":"Who Wrote the Compendium of Chronicles (Jami al-Tawarik) and the Collection of Letters Attributed to Rashid al-Din?","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501749704.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter highlights the Compendium of Chronicles or Jami' al-Tawarikh, which is a three-volume work that John A. Boyle described as “the first world history.” It explains how the Compendium of Chronicles is attributed to the Persian statesman, physician, and historian Rashid al-Din Hamadani. It also looks into the claim of a writer named Abu al-Qasim Abdallah ibn 'Ali Kashani that he was the author of the Compendium of Chronicles. The chapter analyzes the general acceptance among scholars that even if Rashid did not write every word of the Compendium of Chronicles, the entire work was at least accomplished under his direction. It discusses how the scholars' have hypothesized that Kashani was one of those writers who worked under Rashid's direction.","PeriodicalId":364483,"journal":{"name":"Who Wrote That?","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127526326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：