Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.1768
Katharina Diernberger, Xhyljeta Luta, Joanna Bowden, Joanne Droney, Elizabeth Lemmon, Giovanni Tramonti, Bethany Shinkins, Ewan Gray, Joachim Marti, Peter S Hall
Background: Approximately thirty thousand people in Scotland are diagnosed with cancer annually, of whom a third live less than one year. The timing, nature and value of hospital-based healthcare for patients with advanced cancer are not well understood. The study's aim was to describe the timing and nature of hospital-based healthcare use and associated costs in the last year of life for patients with a cancer diagnosis.
Methods: We undertook a Scottish population-wide administrative data linkage study of hospital-based healthcare use for individuals with a cancer diagnosis, who died aged 60 and over between 2012 and 2017. Hospital admissions and length of stay (LOS), as well as the number and nature of outpatient and day case appointments were analysed. Generalised linear models were used to adjust costs for age, gender, socioeconomic deprivation status, rural-urban (RU) status and comorbidity.
Results: The study included 85,732 decedents with a cancer diagnosis. For 64,553 (75.3%) of them, cancer was the primary cause of death. Mean age at death was 80.01 (SD 8.15) years. The mean number of inpatient stays in the last year of life was 5.88 (SD 5.68), with a mean LOS of 7 days. Admission rates rose sharply in the last month of life. One year adjusted and unadjusted costs decreased with increasing age. A higher comorbidity burden was associated with higher costs. Major cost differences were present between cancer types.
Conclusions: People in Scotland in their last year of life with cancer are high users of secondary care. Hospitalisation accounts for a high proportion of costs, particularly in the last month of life. Further research is needed to examine triggers for hospitalisations and to identify influenceable reasons for unwarranted variation in hospital use among different cancer cohorts.
{"title":"Variation in hospital cost trajectories at the end of life by age, multimorbidity and cancer type.","authors":"Katharina Diernberger, Xhyljeta Luta, Joanna Bowden, Joanne Droney, Elizabeth Lemmon, Giovanni Tramonti, Bethany Shinkins, Ewan Gray, Joachim Marti, Peter S Hall","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.1768","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.1768","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately thirty thousand people in Scotland are diagnosed with cancer annually, of whom a third live less than one year. The timing, nature and value of hospital-based healthcare for patients with advanced cancer are not well understood. The study's aim was to describe the timing and nature of hospital-based healthcare use and associated costs in the last year of life for patients with a cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a Scottish population-wide administrative data linkage study of hospital-based healthcare use for individuals with a cancer diagnosis, who died aged 60 and over between 2012 and 2017. Hospital admissions and length of stay (LOS), as well as the number and nature of outpatient and day case appointments were analysed. Generalised linear models were used to adjust costs for age, gender, socioeconomic deprivation status, rural-urban (RU) status and comorbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 85,732 decedents with a cancer diagnosis. For 64,553 (75.3%) of them, cancer was the primary cause of death. Mean age at death was 80.01 (SD 8.15) years. The mean number of inpatient stays in the last year of life was 5.88 (SD 5.68), with a mean LOS of 7 days. Admission rates rose sharply in the last month of life. One year adjusted and unadjusted costs decreased with increasing age. A higher comorbidity burden was associated with higher costs. Major cost differences were present between cancer types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People in Scotland in their last year of life with cancer are high users of secondary care. Hospitalisation accounts for a high proportion of costs, particularly in the last month of life. Further research is needed to examine triggers for hospitalisations and to identify influenceable reasons for unwarranted variation in hospital use among different cancer cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"1768"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/33/27/ijpds-08-1768.PMC9871727.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9200880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2129
Nadine E Andrew, Richard Beare, Tanya Ravipati, Emily Parker, David Snowdon, Kim Naude, Velandai Srikanth
Introduction: Digitalisation of Electronic Health Record (EHR) data has created unique opportunities for research. However, these data are routinely collected for operational purposes and so are not curated to the standard required for research. Harnessing such routine data at large scale allows efficient and long-term epidemiological and health services research.
Objectives: To describe the establishment a linked EHR derived data platform in the National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, Australia, aimed at enabling research targeting national health priority areas in ageing.
Methods: Our approach incorporated: data validation, curation and warehousing to ensure quality and completeness; end-user engagement and consensus on the platform content; implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) pipeline for extraction of text-based data items; early consumer involvement; and implementation of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures, in a multisite public health service.
Results: Data for a cohort of >800,000 patients collected over a 10-year period have been curated within the platform's research data warehouse. So far 117 items have been identified as suitable for inclusion, from 11 research relevant datasets held within the health service EHR systems. Data access, extraction and release processes, guided by the Five Safes Framework, are being tested through project use-cases. A natural language processing (NLP) pipeline has been implemented and a framework for the routine collection and incorporation of patient reported outcome measures developed.
Conclusions: We highlight the importance of establishing comprehensive processes for the foundations of a data platform utilising routine data not collected for research purposes. These robust foundations will facilitate future expansion through linkages to other datasets for the efficient and cost-effective study of health related to ageing at a large scale.
{"title":"Developing a linked electronic health record derived data platform to support research into healthy ageing.","authors":"Nadine E Andrew, Richard Beare, Tanya Ravipati, Emily Parker, David Snowdon, Kim Naude, Velandai Srikanth","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digitalisation of Electronic Health Record (EHR) data has created unique opportunities for research. However, these data are routinely collected for operational purposes and so are not curated to the standard required for research. Harnessing such routine data at large scale allows efficient and long-term epidemiological and health services research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe the establishment a linked EHR derived data platform in the National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, Australia, aimed at enabling research targeting national health priority areas in ageing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our approach incorporated: data validation, curation and warehousing to ensure quality and completeness; end-user engagement and consensus on the platform content; implementation of an artificial intelligence (AI) pipeline for extraction of text-based data items; early consumer involvement; and implementation of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures, in a multisite public health service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data for a cohort of >800,000 patients collected over a 10-year period have been curated within the platform's research data warehouse. So far 117 items have been identified as suitable for inclusion, from 11 research relevant datasets held within the health service EHR systems. Data access, extraction and release processes, guided by the Five Safes Framework, are being tested through project use-cases. A natural language processing (NLP) pipeline has been implemented and a framework for the routine collection and incorporation of patient reported outcome measures developed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We highlight the importance of establishing comprehensive processes for the foundations of a data platform utilising routine data not collected for research purposes. These robust foundations will facilitate future expansion through linkages to other datasets for the efficient and cost-effective study of health related to ageing at a large scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"2129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/f0/ijpds-08-2129.PMC10476553.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10170165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2131
Julia Nadine Doetsch, Eero Kajantie, Vasco Dias, Marit S Indredavik, Randi Kallar Devold, Raquel Teixeira, Jarkko Reittu, Henrique Barros
Key messages: Chronicity and social context influence COVID-19 risk highlighting its syndemic dimension Record Linkage advances knowledge on COVID-19, associated chronic diseases, and social indicators Further harmonization of data protection requirements for scientific research may create multilevel public health measures As a multidimensional tool, it optimizes integrated strategies and fosters solidarity on Health in All Policies (HiAP)
{"title":"Record linkage as a vital key player for the COVID-19 syndemic - The call for legal harmonization to overcome research challenges.","authors":"Julia Nadine Doetsch, Eero Kajantie, Vasco Dias, Marit S Indredavik, Randi Kallar Devold, Raquel Teixeira, Jarkko Reittu, Henrique Barros","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2131","url":null,"abstract":"Key messages:\u0000\u0000Chronicity and social context influence COVID-19 risk highlighting its syndemic dimension\u0000Record Linkage advances knowledge on COVID-19, associated chronic diseases, and social indicators\u0000Further harmonization of data protection requirements for scientific research may create multilevel public health measures\u0000As a multidimensional tool, it optimizes integrated strategies and fosters solidarity on Health in All Policies (HiAP)","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"2131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/23/8f/ijpds-08-2131.PMC10476633.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10225315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2121
Shona M Kerr, Rachel Edwards, David Buchanan, John Dean, Zosia Miedzybrodzka, James F Wilson
Introduction: The purpose of VIKING II is to create an observational cohort of volunteers with ancestry from the Northern Isles of Scotland, primarily for identifying genetic variants influencing disease. The new online protocol is separate to, but follows on from, earlier genetic epidemiological clinic-based studies in the isolated populations of Orkney and Shetland. These populations are favourable for the study of rarer genetic variants due to genetic drift, the large number of relatives, and availability of pedigree information. They are known to be genetically distinct from mainland British populations.
Methods and analysis: Online methods are being used to recruit ~4,000 people who have Northern Isles ancestry, living anywhere in the world. The option for participants to have actionable genetic results returned is offered. Consent will be taken electronically. Data will be collected at baseline through an online questionnaire and longitudinally through linkage to NHS data in the electronic health record. The questionnaire collects a variety of phenotypes including personal and family health. DNA will be extracted from saliva samples then genome-wide genotyped and exome sequenced. VIKING II aims to capitalise on the special features of the Northern Isles populations to create a research cohort that will facilitate the analysis of genetic variants associated with a broad range of traits and disease endpoints, including otherwise rare variants that have drifted to high frequency in these populations.
Ethics and dissemination: The South East Scotland Research Ethics Committee gave the study a favourable opinion. VIKING II is sponsored by the University of Edinburgh and NHS Lothian. Summary research findings will be disseminated to participants and funding bodies, presented at conferences and reported in peer-reviewed publications.
Article summary: Strengths and limitations of this studyDetailed data and biological sample collection of research volunteers with unique ancestry.Consent for access to routinely collected clinical EHR data and for future re-contact, providing a longitudinal component.Optional consent for return of actionable genetic results.~4,000 participants is a relatively small number for certain types of genetic analyses, so the cohort is underpowered on its own, in some study designs.Resources to maintain the cohort, and to store data and DNA samples, are significant, with sustainability dependent on infrastructure support and funding.
{"title":"VIKING II, a worldwide observational cohort of volunteers with northern isles ancestry.","authors":"Shona M Kerr, Rachel Edwards, David Buchanan, John Dean, Zosia Miedzybrodzka, James F Wilson","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of VIKING II is to create an observational cohort of volunteers with ancestry from the Northern Isles of Scotland, primarily for identifying genetic variants influencing disease. The new online protocol is separate to, but follows on from, earlier genetic epidemiological clinic-based studies in the isolated populations of Orkney and Shetland. These populations are favourable for the study of rarer genetic variants due to genetic drift, the large number of relatives, and availability of pedigree information. They are known to be genetically distinct from mainland British populations.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>Online methods are being used to recruit ~4,000 people who have Northern Isles ancestry, living anywhere in the world. The option for participants to have actionable genetic results returned is offered. Consent will be taken electronically. Data will be collected at baseline through an online questionnaire and longitudinally through linkage to NHS data in the electronic health record. The questionnaire collects a variety of phenotypes including personal and family health. DNA will be extracted from saliva samples then genome-wide genotyped and exome sequenced. VIKING II aims to capitalise on the special features of the Northern Isles populations to create a research cohort that will facilitate the analysis of genetic variants associated with a broad range of traits and disease endpoints, including otherwise rare variants that have drifted to high frequency in these populations.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The South East Scotland Research Ethics Committee gave the study a favourable opinion. VIKING II is sponsored by the University of Edinburgh and NHS Lothian. Summary research findings will be disseminated to participants and funding bodies, presented at conferences and reported in peer-reviewed publications.</p><p><strong>Article summary: </strong>Strengths and limitations of this studyDetailed data and biological sample collection of research volunteers with unique ancestry.Consent for access to routinely collected clinical EHR data and for future re-contact, providing a longitudinal component.Optional consent for return of actionable genetic results.~4,000 participants is a relatively small number for certain types of genetic analyses, so the cohort is underpowered on its own, in some study designs.Resources to maintain the cohort, and to store data and DNA samples, are significant, with sustainability dependent on infrastructure support and funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"2121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/58/ijpds-08-2121.PMC10476511.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10522943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2139
Jing Wang, Yanhong Jessika Hu, Lana Collins, Anna Fedyukova, Varnika Aggarwal, Fiona Mensah, Jeanie L Y Cheong, Melissa Wake
Introduction: Newborn babies who require admission for specialist care can experience immediate and sometimes lasting impacts. For babies admitted to special care nurseries (SCN), there is no dataset comparable to that of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN), which has helped improve the quality and consistency of neonatal intensive care through standardised data collection.
Objectives: We aim to establish a proof-of-concept, Victoria-wide registry of babies admitted to SCN, embedded within the whole-of-Victoria Generation Victoria (GenV) cohort.
Methods: This prototype registry is a depth sub-cohort nested within GenV, targeting all babies born in Victoria from Oct-2021 to Oct-2023. Infants admitted to SCN are eligible. The minimum dataset will be harmonised with ANZNN for common constructs but also include SCN-only items, and will cover maternal, antenatal, newborn, respiratory/respiratory support, cardiac, infection, nutrition, feeding, cerebral and other items. As well as the dataset, this protocol outlines the anticipated cohort, timeline for this registry, and how this will serve as a resource for longitudinal research through its integration with the GenV longitudinal cohort and linked datasets.
Conclusion: The registry will provide the opportunity to better understand the health and future outcomes of the large and growing cohort of children that require specialist care after birth. The data would generate translatable evidence and could lay the groundwork for a stand-alone ongoing clinical quality registry post-GenV.
{"title":"Study protocol: Generation Victoria (GenV) special care nursery registry.","authors":"Jing Wang, Yanhong Jessika Hu, Lana Collins, Anna Fedyukova, Varnika Aggarwal, Fiona Mensah, Jeanie L Y Cheong, Melissa Wake","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2139","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2139","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Newborn babies who require admission for specialist care can experience immediate and sometimes lasting impacts. For babies admitted to special care nurseries (SCN), there is no dataset comparable to that of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN), which has helped improve the quality and consistency of neonatal intensive care through standardised data collection.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aim to establish a proof-of-concept, Victoria-wide registry of babies admitted to SCN, embedded within the whole-of-Victoria Generation Victoria (GenV) cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prototype registry is a depth sub-cohort nested within GenV, targeting all babies born in Victoria from Oct-2021 to Oct-2023. Infants admitted to SCN are eligible. The minimum dataset will be harmonised with ANZNN for common constructs but also include SCN-only items, and will cover maternal, antenatal, newborn, respiratory/respiratory support, cardiac, infection, nutrition, feeding, cerebral and other items. As well as the dataset, this protocol outlines the anticipated cohort, timeline for this registry, and how this will serve as a resource for longitudinal research through its integration with the GenV longitudinal cohort and linked datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The registry will provide the opportunity to better understand the health and future outcomes of the large and growing cohort of children that require specialist care after birth. The data would generate translatable evidence and could lay the groundwork for a stand-alone ongoing clinical quality registry post-GenV.</p>","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"2139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/6a/ijpds-08-2139.PMC10476699.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10225321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-29eCollection Date: 2022-01-01DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i4.1762
Hallie Eilerts-Spinelli, Julio Romero Prieto, Julie Ambia, Sammy Khagayi, Chodziwadziwa Kabudula, Jeffrey W Eaton, Georges Reniers
Introduction: Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems (HDSS) are important sources of population health data in sub-Saharan Africa, but the recording of pregnancies, pregnancy outcomes, and early mortality is often incomplete.
Objective: This study assessed HDSS pregnancy reporting completeness and identified predictors of unreported pregnancies that likely ended in adverse outcomes.
Methods: The analysis utilized individually-linked HDSS and antenatal care (ANC) data from Siaya, Kenya for pregnancies in 2018-2020. We cross-checked ANC records with HDSS pregnancy registrations and outcomes. Pregnancies observed in the ANC that were missing reports in the HDSS despite a data collection round following the expected delivery date were identified as likely adverse outcomes, and we investigated the characteristics of such individuals. Clinical data were used to investigate the timing of HDSS pregnancy registration relative to care seeking and gestational age, and examine misclassification of miscarriages and stillbirths.
Results: From an analytical sample of 2,475 pregnancies observed in the ANC registers, 46% had pregnancy registrations in the HDSS, and 89% had retrospectively reported pregnancy outcomes. 1% of registered pregnancies were missing outcomes, compared to 10% of those lacking registration. Registered pregnancies had higher rates of stillbirth and perinatal mortality than those lacking registration. In 77% of cases, women accessed ANC prior to registering the pregnancy in the HDSS. Half of reported miscarriages were misclassified stillbirths. We identified 141 unreported pregnancies that likely ended in adverse outcomes. Such cases were more common among those who visited ANC clinics during the first trimester, made fewer overall visits, were HIV-positive, and outside of formal union.
Conclusions: Record linkage with ANC clinics revealed pregnancy underreporting in HDSS, resulting in biased measurement of perinatal mortality. Integrating records of ANC usage into routine data collection can augment HDSS pregnancy surveillance and improve monitoring of adverse pregnancy outcomes and early mortality.
{"title":"Evaluating pregnancy reporting in Siaya Health and Demographic Surveillance System through record linkage with ANC clinics.","authors":"Hallie Eilerts-Spinelli, Julio Romero Prieto, Julie Ambia, Sammy Khagayi, Chodziwadziwa Kabudula, Jeffrey W Eaton, Georges Reniers","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v7i4.1762","DOIUrl":"10.23889/ijpds.v7i4.1762","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems (HDSS) are important sources of population health data in sub-Saharan Africa, but the recording of pregnancies, pregnancy outcomes, and early mortality is often incomplete.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed HDSS pregnancy reporting completeness and identified predictors of unreported pregnancies that likely ended in adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis utilized individually-linked HDSS and antenatal care (ANC) data from Siaya, Kenya for pregnancies in 2018-2020. We cross-checked ANC records with HDSS pregnancy registrations and outcomes. Pregnancies observed in the ANC that were missing reports in the HDSS despite a data collection round following the expected delivery date were identified as likely adverse outcomes, and we investigated the characteristics of such individuals. Clinical data were used to investigate the timing of HDSS pregnancy registration relative to care seeking and gestational age, and examine misclassification of miscarriages and stillbirths.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From an analytical sample of 2,475 pregnancies observed in the ANC registers, 46% had pregnancy registrations in the HDSS, and 89% had retrospectively reported pregnancy outcomes. 1% of registered pregnancies were missing outcomes, compared to 10% of those lacking registration. Registered pregnancies had higher rates of stillbirth and perinatal mortality than those lacking registration. In 77% of cases, women accessed ANC prior to registering the pregnancy in the HDSS. Half of reported miscarriages were misclassified stillbirths. We identified 141 unreported pregnancies that likely ended in adverse outcomes. Such cases were more common among those who visited ANC clinics during the first trimester, made fewer overall visits, were HIV-positive, and outside of formal union.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Record linkage with ANC clinics revealed pregnancy underreporting in HDSS, resulting in biased measurement of perinatal mortality. Integrating records of ANC usage into routine data collection can augment HDSS pregnancy surveillance and improve monitoring of adverse pregnancy outcomes and early mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"7 4","pages":"1762"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7b/84/ijpds-07-1762.PMC10167572.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9845524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-04DOI: 10.1101/2022.09.04.22279576
J. Mur, R. Marioni, T. Russ, G. Muniz-Terrera, S. R. Cox
Anticholinergic drugs block muscarinic receptors in the body. They are commonly prescribed for a variety of indications and their use has previously been associated with dementia and cognitive decline. In UK Biobank participants with linked health-care records (n=163,043, aged 40-71 at baseline), for about 17,000 of which MRI data was available, we calculated the total anticholinergic drug burden according to 15 different anticholinergic scales and due to different classes of drugs. We then used linear regression to explore the associations between anticholinergic burden and various measures of cognition and structural MRI, including general cognitive ability, 9 separate cognitive domains, brain atrophy, volumes of 68 cortical and 14 subcortical areas, and fractional anisotropy and median diffusivity of 25 white-matter tracts. Anticholinergic burden was modestly associated with poorer cognition across most anticholinergic scales and cognitive tests (7/9 FDR-adjusted significant associations, standardised betas ({beta}) range: -0.039, -0.003). When using the anticholinergic scale exhibiting the strongest association with cognitive functions, anticholinergic burden due to most classes of drugs exhibited negative associations with cognitive function, with {beta}-lactam antibiotics ({beta}=-0.035, pFDR<0.001) and opioids ({beta}=-0.026, pFDR<0.001) exhibiting the strongest effects. Anticholinergic burden was not associated with any measure of brain macro- or microstructure (pFDR>0.08). Anticholinergic burden is weakly associated with poorer cognition, but there is little evidence for associations with brain structure. Future studies might focus more broadly on polypharmacy or more narrowly on distinct drug classes, instead of using purported anticholinergic action to study the effects of drugs on cognitive ability.
{"title":"Anticholinergic burden in middle and older age is associated with reduced cognitive function, but not with brain atrophy","authors":"J. Mur, R. Marioni, T. Russ, G. Muniz-Terrera, S. R. Cox","doi":"10.1101/2022.09.04.22279576","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.04.22279576","url":null,"abstract":"Anticholinergic drugs block muscarinic receptors in the body. They are commonly prescribed for a variety of indications and their use has previously been associated with dementia and cognitive decline. In UK Biobank participants with linked health-care records (n=163,043, aged 40-71 at baseline), for about 17,000 of which MRI data was available, we calculated the total anticholinergic drug burden according to 15 different anticholinergic scales and due to different classes of drugs. We then used linear regression to explore the associations between anticholinergic burden and various measures of cognition and structural MRI, including general cognitive ability, 9 separate cognitive domains, brain atrophy, volumes of 68 cortical and 14 subcortical areas, and fractional anisotropy and median diffusivity of 25 white-matter tracts. Anticholinergic burden was modestly associated with poorer cognition across most anticholinergic scales and cognitive tests (7/9 FDR-adjusted significant associations, standardised betas ({beta}) range: -0.039, -0.003). When using the anticholinergic scale exhibiting the strongest association with cognitive functions, anticholinergic burden due to most classes of drugs exhibited negative associations with cognitive function, with {beta}-lactam antibiotics ({beta}=-0.035, pFDR<0.001) and opioids ({beta}=-0.026, pFDR<0.001) exhibiting the strongest effects. Anticholinergic burden was not associated with any measure of brain macro- or microstructure (pFDR>0.08). Anticholinergic burden is weakly associated with poorer cognition, but there is little evidence for associations with brain structure. Future studies might focus more broadly on polypharmacy or more narrowly on distinct drug classes, instead of using purported anticholinergic action to study the effects of drugs on cognitive ability.","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"62350694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-25DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.1814
E. Duku, B. Forer, Molly M. Pottruff, M. Guhn, M. Janus
ObjectivesTo contribute to the evidence on the association between neighbourhood-level child development in Kindergarten and neighbourhood SES, our objective was to quantify the sociodemographic and child development characteristics of the neighbourhoods that “defy expectations”: high SES neighbourhoods with much-worse-than-expected child outcomes, and low SES neighbourhoods with much-better-than-expected child outcomes. ApproachUsing exploratory and model-based Latent Profile Analysis (LPA), we identified homogenous profile groups of 2038 customized Canadian neighbourhoods using ten SES indicators. We identified the most parsimonious number of profile groups and validated and characterized the derived groups of neighbourhoods using neighbourhood and aggregated child characteristics. Next, as our outcome, we created quartile groups for developmental vulnerability risk, measured with the Early Development Instrument (EDI), to match the number of derived neighbourhood profile groups. Last, we used contingency table analysis to identify neighbourhoods that defy expectations, and then characterized these neighbourhoods using descriptive statistics and correlational analysis. ResultsThe LPA identified four neighbourhood SES groups which we labelled “Low” (31.6%), “Low-moderate” (12.7%), “High-moderate” (38.4%) and “High” (17.4%). These four SES groups were cross-tabulated with quartile groups of EDI vulnerability risk. Inspection of the resulting 4-by-4 contingency table showed that within the “Low” SES profile group 57 (8.9%) neighbourhoods had much-better-than-expected developmental vulnerability risk. Conversely, within the “High” SES profile group, 12 (3.4%) neighbourhood had much-worse-than-expected developmental vulnerability risk. Additionally, these analyses identified large provincial differences in the proportion of neighbourhoods that defy expectation. In 12 provinces and territories in the study, the proportion of neighbourhoods that defied expectations within each province ranged from zero to 50%. ConclusionThe identification of neighbourhoods that defy expectations contributes to our understanding of neighbourhood factors influencing child development. Using mixed-methods approaches, these neighbourhoods can be compared to nearby neighbourhoods from the same SES profile group that do not defy expectations, in an effort to identify contextual factors that differentiate them.
{"title":"Defying Expectations: Can We Identify Neighbourhoods with “Other Than Expected” Developmental Outcomes?","authors":"E. Duku, B. Forer, Molly M. Pottruff, M. Guhn, M. Janus","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.1814","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.1814","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo contribute to the evidence on the association between neighbourhood-level child development in Kindergarten and neighbourhood SES, our objective was to quantify the sociodemographic and child development characteristics of the neighbourhoods that “defy expectations”: high SES neighbourhoods with much-worse-than-expected child outcomes, and low SES neighbourhoods with much-better-than-expected child outcomes. \u0000ApproachUsing exploratory and model-based Latent Profile Analysis (LPA), we identified homogenous profile groups of 2038 customized Canadian neighbourhoods using ten SES indicators. We identified the most parsimonious number of profile groups and validated and characterized the derived groups of neighbourhoods using neighbourhood and aggregated child characteristics. Next, as our outcome, we created quartile groups for developmental vulnerability risk, measured with the Early Development Instrument (EDI), to match the number of derived neighbourhood profile groups. Last, we used contingency table analysis to identify neighbourhoods that defy expectations, and then characterized these neighbourhoods using descriptive statistics and correlational analysis. \u0000ResultsThe LPA identified four neighbourhood SES groups which we labelled “Low” (31.6%), “Low-moderate” (12.7%), “High-moderate” (38.4%) and “High” (17.4%). These four SES groups were cross-tabulated with quartile groups of EDI vulnerability risk. Inspection of the resulting 4-by-4 contingency table showed that within the “Low” SES profile group 57 (8.9%) neighbourhoods had much-better-than-expected developmental vulnerability risk. Conversely, within the “High” SES profile group, 12 (3.4%) neighbourhood had much-worse-than-expected developmental vulnerability risk. Additionally, these analyses identified large provincial differences in the proportion of neighbourhoods that defy expectation. In 12 provinces and territories in the study, the proportion of neighbourhoods that defied expectations within each province ranged from zero to 50%. \u0000ConclusionThe identification of neighbourhoods that defy expectations contributes to our understanding of neighbourhood factors influencing child development. Using mixed-methods approaches, these neighbourhoods can be compared to nearby neighbourhoods from the same SES profile group that do not defy expectations, in an effort to identify contextual factors that differentiate them.","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45777702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-25DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2091
W. Wodchis, Yuqing Bai, L. Mondor, R. Hall
ObjectiveDiabetes management requires ongoing monitoring of diabetes care from primary care, specialist care and laboratory testing. COVID-19 led to changes in access to in-person care. The purpose of this research was to assess changes in the management of diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic using population-linked datasets and population segmentation. ApproachWe identified over 1.4 Million Ontarians with diabetes (approximately 10% of the population) with valid health insurance as of April 1, 2019 and April 1, 2020. We measured 11 indicators of diabetes management including laboratory testing for HbA1c and LDL (highlighted in this abstract). With screening indicators, we examined changes in the proportion of the population up-to-date with screening at the end of each fiscal year (March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021) overall and according to population segments created using linked health data from primary care, home care, long term care and hospitals. ResultsOverall screening rates that required laboratory testing for HbA1c and LDL fell substantially from 54% to 40% and 68% to 59% overall. Comparing across population segments, residents in Long Term Care facilities had the smallest changes in screening rates; individuals with low, medium and high complexity chronic conditions and end-of-life conditions had the largest changes; maternity, cancer, mental health and frail populations were in the middle. Differences according the primary care enrolment models (capitation vs fee-for-service) were relatively minor but patients who were not rostered to a primary care physician had the largest reductions in laboratory screening. Results for all 11 indicators will be shared in the presentation. ConclusionCOVID-19 was associated with substantial reductions in laboratory-based diabetes screening. Poor diabetes management is one of the strongest risk-factors for adverse outcomes in COVID-19. Rates of diabetes management declined most for at risk patient populations amplifying the need to differentially connect with patients to ensure ongoing care during the pandemic.
{"title":"A population-based approach to assessing diabetes management during COVID-19: insights from population data in Ontario, Canada.","authors":"W. Wodchis, Yuqing Bai, L. Mondor, R. Hall","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2091","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveDiabetes management requires ongoing monitoring of diabetes care from primary care, specialist care and laboratory testing. COVID-19 led to changes in access to in-person care. The purpose of this research was to assess changes in the management of diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic using population-linked datasets and population segmentation. \u0000ApproachWe identified over 1.4 Million Ontarians with diabetes (approximately 10% of the population) with valid health insurance as of April 1, 2019 and April 1, 2020. We measured 11 indicators of diabetes management including laboratory testing for HbA1c and LDL (highlighted in this abstract). With screening indicators, we examined changes in the proportion of the population up-to-date with screening at the end of each fiscal year (March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2021) overall and according to population segments created using linked health data from primary care, home care, long term care and hospitals. \u0000ResultsOverall screening rates that required laboratory testing for HbA1c and LDL fell substantially from 54% to 40% and 68% to 59% overall. Comparing across population segments, residents in Long Term Care facilities had the smallest changes in screening rates; individuals with low, medium and high complexity chronic conditions and end-of-life conditions had the largest changes; maternity, cancer, mental health and frail populations were in the middle. Differences according the primary care enrolment models (capitation vs fee-for-service) were relatively minor but patients who were not rostered to a primary care physician had the largest reductions in laboratory screening. Results for all 11 indicators will be shared in the presentation. \u0000ConclusionCOVID-19 was associated with substantial reductions in laboratory-based diabetes screening. Poor diabetes management is one of the strongest risk-factors for adverse outcomes in COVID-19. Rates of diabetes management declined most for at risk patient populations amplifying the need to differentially connect with patients to ensure ongoing care during the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44036690","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-25DOI: 10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2109
Elizabeth Ford, Kathryn Stanley, M. Rees-Roberts, A. Madzvamuse, Jocelyn W. Armes, Sarah Giles
ObjectivesIn Kent, Surrey and Sussex (KSS), linked health and social care datasets are in set-up phase in NHS integrated care systems (ICS), and governance models for using data for planning and research are under development. This represented an exceptional opportunity to consult with KSS citizens and work together to identify how ICSs in KSS can secure a social licence for data-linkage and data uses. MethodsWe held online deliberative discussion focus groups asking KSS citizens to discuss the perceived benefits and risks of data-linkage for planning and research; to describe safeguards they expected around the data, and to describe how the public should be involved in, and communicated with, regarding governance and uses of datasets. We held one creative workshop in which participants artistically depicted their support or concerns around data. Results79 KSS citizens took part in 5 focus groups, and 7 participants attended the creative workshop. There was widespread support for data-linkage to improve efficiency of services and information flows, with the expectation that this would improve patient experience. Proposed ICS governance models were acceptable, but participants identified four key values to ensure appropriate use: acknowledging experience of stigma and discrimination; public voices being heard; holding people to account; and keeping data trails and audits. Participants gave a range of suggestions for ensuring public involvement and communication would be accessible and reach a diverse audience, such as using community champions to ensure a range of contributors, using plain language, giving concise information, building trust through mutually respectful relationships, and valuing public contributions through appropriate payment. ConclusionSocial licence theory describes expectations that organisations go beyond requirements of formal regulation and ensure transparent values of reciprocity, non-exploitation and service to the public good. Following findings from this project, ICSs in KSS are now in a good position to deliver social licence values, together with a strong public voice, to inform and determine governance arrangements for linked datasets in the region.
{"title":"Co-creating a social licence for using novel linked datasets for planning and research in Kent, Surrey and Sussex: results of deliberative focus groups and a creative workshop.","authors":"Elizabeth Ford, Kathryn Stanley, M. Rees-Roberts, A. Madzvamuse, Jocelyn W. Armes, Sarah Giles","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2109","url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesIn Kent, Surrey and Sussex (KSS), linked health and social care datasets are in set-up phase in NHS integrated care systems (ICS), and governance models for using data for planning and research are under development. This represented an exceptional opportunity to consult with KSS citizens and work together to identify how ICSs in KSS can secure a social licence for data-linkage and data uses. \u0000MethodsWe held online deliberative discussion focus groups asking KSS citizens to discuss the perceived benefits and risks of data-linkage for planning and research; to describe safeguards they expected around the data, and to describe how the public should be involved in, and communicated with, regarding governance and uses of datasets. We held one creative workshop in which participants artistically depicted their support or concerns around data. \u0000Results79 KSS citizens took part in 5 focus groups, and 7 participants attended the creative workshop. There was widespread support for data-linkage to improve efficiency of services and information flows, with the expectation that this would improve patient experience. Proposed ICS governance models were acceptable, but participants identified four key values to ensure appropriate use: acknowledging experience of stigma and discrimination; public voices being heard; holding people to account; and keeping data trails and audits. Participants gave a range of suggestions for ensuring public involvement and communication would be accessible and reach a diverse audience, such as using community champions to ensure a range of contributors, using plain language, giving concise information, building trust through mutually respectful relationships, and valuing public contributions through appropriate payment. \u0000ConclusionSocial licence theory describes expectations that organisations go beyond requirements of formal regulation and ensure transparent values of reciprocity, non-exploitation and service to the public good. Following findings from this project, ICSs in KSS are now in a good position to deliver social licence values, together with a strong public voice, to inform and determine governance arrangements for linked datasets in the region.","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44237369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}