Jessica A Cao, Avery W Zhou, Gail M Teagle, Liisa M Baumann, Ryan A Sahraravand, Calvin W Wong, Sandro De Zanet, Natasa Jovic, Patrick Steiner, Sagar B Patel, Samuel A Minaker, Mathew W MacCumber, David M Brown, Hasenin Al-Khersan, Charles C Wykoff
This retrospective study evaluated changes in ocular characteristics and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptor ellipsoid zone (EZ) depletion rates before and after intravitreal pegcetacoplan initiation in clinical practice. A total of 168 eyes from 110 patients with GA secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who received at least 3 pegcetacoplan injections were included. Data was collected from 5 years before to 9 months after pegcetacoplan initiation. RPE and EZ depletion areas were measured using an automated artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. At baseline, 76 eyes (45.2%) had concurrent neovascular AMD (nAMD), with mean RPE and EZ depletion areas of 3.3 mm2 and 4.9 mm2, respectively. By pegcetacoplan initiation, these increased to 8.6 mm2 and 11.2 mm2, respectively, with 151 eyes (89.9%) having concurrent nAMD and 155 eyes (92.3%) having subfoveal GA. Pre-treatment to post-treatment RPE and EZ square root depletion rates decreased from 0.25 mm/year to 0.096 mm/year, and 0.26 mm/year to 0.049 mm/year, respectively. Mean best-recorded visual acuity (BRVA) worsened by 0.05 logMAR annually before and after treatment. These real-world findings align with data from the pegcetacoplan phase 3 trials, showing reduced RPE and EZ depletion rates without changes in rates of BRVA loss. Additional studies are warranted.
{"title":"Geographic Atrophy Progression in Clinical Practice Before and After Pegcetacoplan Treatment.","authors":"Jessica A Cao, Avery W Zhou, Gail M Teagle, Liisa M Baumann, Ryan A Sahraravand, Calvin W Wong, Sandro De Zanet, Natasa Jovic, Patrick Steiner, Sagar B Patel, Samuel A Minaker, Mathew W MacCumber, David M Brown, Hasenin Al-Khersan, Charles C Wykoff","doi":"10.3390/vision9040095","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vision9040095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study evaluated changes in ocular characteristics and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptor ellipsoid zone (EZ) depletion rates before and after intravitreal pegcetacoplan initiation in clinical practice. A total of 168 eyes from 110 patients with GA secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who received at least 3 pegcetacoplan injections were included. Data was collected from 5 years before to 9 months after pegcetacoplan initiation. RPE and EZ depletion areas were measured using an automated artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. At baseline, 76 eyes (45.2%) had concurrent neovascular AMD (nAMD), with mean RPE and EZ depletion areas of 3.3 mm<sup>2</sup> and 4.9 mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. By pegcetacoplan initiation, these increased to 8.6 mm<sup>2</sup> and 11.2 mm<sup>2</sup>, respectively, with 151 eyes (89.9%) having concurrent nAMD and 155 eyes (92.3%) having subfoveal GA. Pre-treatment to post-treatment RPE and EZ square root depletion rates decreased from 0.25 mm/year to 0.096 mm/year, and 0.26 mm/year to 0.049 mm/year, respectively. Mean best-recorded visual acuity (BRVA) worsened by 0.05 logMAR annually before and after treatment. These real-world findings align with data from the pegcetacoplan phase 3 trials, showing reduced RPE and EZ depletion rates without changes in rates of BRVA loss. Additional studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12641863/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145589097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
David Tayah, Ricardo Noguera Louzada, Pedro Lucas Machado Magalhães, Youssef Tayah, Dillan Cunha Amaral, Chow Wang Ming Shato, Daniel Oliveira Dantas, Milton Ruiz Alves
This study evaluates the ability of the QuickSee Free (QSF) portable autorefractor (PlenOptika) to detect and measure refractive error compared to subjective clinical refractometry (SCR) in a Brazilian adult population in a low-resource setting in Amazonas. A total of 100 participants aged 18-65 years underwent visual acuity screening and autorefraction with and without cycloplegia using the QSF, alongside a complete ophthalmic examination including SCR. Refractive error measurements included spherical component (SC), cylindrical component (CC), cylindrical axis (CA), spherical equivalent (SE), and vector powers (MV90 and MV135). Accuracy was assessed for hyperopia ≥ +2.00 D, myopia ≤ -0.75 D, astigmatism ≥ 1.00 DC, and anisometropia ≥ 1.00 D using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The area under the curve for detecting significant refractive errors ranged from 0.538 to 0.930. The mean difference between QSF without cycloplegia and SCR was -1.08 ± 1.17 D for SC and -1.15 ± 1.15 D for SE (p < 0.0001), and with cycloplegia, it was -0.81 ± 1.07 D and -0.83 ± 1.02 D, respectively. The QSF exhibited a moderate negative bias for both SC and SE with and without cycloplegia, underestimating these values, but it showed good predictability for detecting refractive errors in a low-resource setting.
本研究评估了QuickSee Free (QSF)便携式自动折射仪(PlenOptika)检测和测量屈光不正的能力,并将其与主观临床折射仪(SCR)在亚马逊地区低资源环境下的巴西成年人中进行了比较。共有100名年龄在18-65岁之间的参与者使用QSF进行了视力筛查和自行屈光检查,并进行了包括SCR在内的完整眼科检查。屈光误差测量包括球面分量(SC)、圆柱分量(CC)、圆柱轴分量(CA)、球面等效分量(SE)和矢量功率(MV90和MV135)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估远视≥+2.00 D、近视≤-0.75 D、散光≥1.00 DC、参差≥1.00 D的准确性。检测明显屈光不正的曲线下面积范围为0.538 ~ 0.930。无单眼截瘫的QSF与SCR的平均差值分别为-1.08±1.17 D (SC)和-1.15±1.15 D (SE) (p < 0.0001),单眼截瘫的QSF分别为-0.81±1.07 D和-0.83±1.02 D。QSF在伴有或不伴有睫状体麻痹的SC和SE中均表现出中度负偏倚,低估了这些值,但在低资源环境下,它在检测屈光不正方面表现出良好的可预测性。
{"title":"Clinical Evaluation of an Affordable Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor in an Adult Population in a Low-Resource Setting in the Amazonas.","authors":"David Tayah, Ricardo Noguera Louzada, Pedro Lucas Machado Magalhães, Youssef Tayah, Dillan Cunha Amaral, Chow Wang Ming Shato, Daniel Oliveira Dantas, Milton Ruiz Alves","doi":"10.3390/vision9040094","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vision9040094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the ability of the QuickSee Free (QSF) portable autorefractor (PlenOptika) to detect and measure refractive error compared to subjective clinical refractometry (SCR) in a Brazilian adult population in a low-resource setting in Amazonas. A total of 100 participants aged 18-65 years underwent visual acuity screening and autorefraction with and without cycloplegia using the QSF, alongside a complete ophthalmic examination including SCR. Refractive error measurements included spherical component (SC), cylindrical component (CC), cylindrical axis (CA), spherical equivalent (SE), and vector powers (MV90 and MV135). Accuracy was assessed for hyperopia ≥ +2.00 D, myopia ≤ -0.75 D, astigmatism ≥ 1.00 DC, and anisometropia ≥ 1.00 D using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The area under the curve for detecting significant refractive errors ranged from 0.538 to 0.930. The mean difference between QSF without cycloplegia and SCR was -1.08 ± 1.17 D for SC and -1.15 ± 1.15 D for SE (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and with cycloplegia, it was -0.81 ± 1.07 D and -0.83 ± 1.02 D, respectively. The QSF exhibited a moderate negative bias for both SC and SE with and without cycloplegia, underestimating these values, but it showed good predictability for detecting refractive errors in a low-resource setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12641641/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145589157","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rodrigo Otávio Cantanhede Costa, Pedro Alexandre Ferreira França, Alexandre César Pinto Pessoa, Geraldo Braz Júnior, João Dallyson Sousa de Almeida, António Cunha
Deep learning for glaucoma screening often relies on high-resolution clinical images and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). However, these methods face significant performance drops when applied to noisy, low-resolution images from portable devices. To address this, our work investigates ensemble methods using multiple Transformer architectures for automated glaucoma detection in challenging scenarios. We use the Brazil Glaucoma (BrG) and private D-Eye datasets to assess model robustness. These datasets include images typical of smartphone-coupled ophthalmoscopes, which are often noisy and variable in quality. Four Transformer models-Swin-Tiny, ViT-Base, MobileViT-Small, and DeiT-Base-were trained and evaluated both individually and in ensembles. We evaluated the results at both image and patient levels to reflect clinical practice. The results show that, although performance drops on lower-quality images, ensemble combinations and patient-level aggregation significantly improve accuracy and sensitivity. We achieved up to 85% accuracy and an 84.2% F1-score on the D-Eye dataset, with a notable reduction in false negatives. Grad-CAM attention maps confirmed that Transformers identify anatomical regions relevant to diagnosis. These findings reinforce the potential of Transformer ensembles as an accessible solution for early glaucoma detection in populations with limited access to specialized equipment.
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Transformer Architectures and Ensemble Methods for Automated Glaucoma Screening in Fundus Images from Portable Ophthalmoscopes.","authors":"Rodrigo Otávio Cantanhede Costa, Pedro Alexandre Ferreira França, Alexandre César Pinto Pessoa, Geraldo Braz Júnior, João Dallyson Sousa de Almeida, António Cunha","doi":"10.3390/vision9040093","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vision9040093","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deep learning for glaucoma screening often relies on high-resolution clinical images and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). However, these methods face significant performance drops when applied to noisy, low-resolution images from portable devices. To address this, our work investigates ensemble methods using multiple Transformer architectures for automated glaucoma detection in challenging scenarios. We use the Brazil Glaucoma (BrG) and private D-Eye datasets to assess model robustness. These datasets include images typical of smartphone-coupled ophthalmoscopes, which are often noisy and variable in quality. Four Transformer models-Swin-Tiny, ViT-Base, MobileViT-Small, and DeiT-Base-were trained and evaluated both individually and in ensembles. We evaluated the results at both image and patient levels to reflect clinical practice. The results show that, although performance drops on lower-quality images, ensemble combinations and patient-level aggregation significantly improve accuracy and sensitivity. We achieved up to 85% accuracy and an 84.2% F1-score on the D-Eye dataset, with a notable reduction in false negatives. Grad-CAM attention maps confirmed that Transformers identify anatomical regions relevant to diagnosis. These findings reinforce the potential of Transformer ensembles as an accessible solution for early glaucoma detection in populations with limited access to specialized equipment.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12641837/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145589100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vivian M Ciaramitaro, Erinda Morina, Jenny L Wu, Daniel A Harris, Sarah A Hayes-Skelton
Models suggest social anxiety is characterized by negative processing biases. Negative biases also arise from negative mood, i.e., state affect. We examined how social anxiety influences emotional processing and whether state affect, or mood, modified the relationship between social anxiety and perceptual bias. We quantified bias by determining the point of subjective equality, PSE, the face judged equally often as happy and as angry. We found perceptual bias depended on social anxiety and state affect. PSE was greater in individuals high (mean PSE: 8.69) versus low (mean PSE: 3.04) in social anxiety. The higher PSE indicated a stronger negative bias in high social anxiety. State affect modified this relationship, with high social anxiety associated with stronger negative biases, but only for individuals with greater negative affect. State affect and trait anxiety interacted such that social anxiety status alone was insufficient to fully characterize perceptual biases. This raises several issues such as the need to consider what constitutes an appropriate control group and the need to consider state affect in social anxiety. Importantly, our results suggest compensatory effects may counteract the influences of negative mood in individuals low in social anxiety.
{"title":"Biases in Perceiving Positive Versus Negative Emotions: The Influence of Social Anxiety and State Affect.","authors":"Vivian M Ciaramitaro, Erinda Morina, Jenny L Wu, Daniel A Harris, Sarah A Hayes-Skelton","doi":"10.3390/vision9040092","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vision9040092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Models suggest social anxiety is characterized by negative processing biases. Negative biases also arise from negative mood, i.e., state affect. We examined how social anxiety influences emotional processing and whether state affect, or mood, modified the relationship between social anxiety and perceptual bias. We quantified bias by determining the point of subjective equality, PSE, the face judged equally often as happy and as angry. We found perceptual bias depended on social anxiety and state affect. PSE was greater in individuals high (mean PSE: 8.69) versus low (mean PSE: 3.04) in social anxiety. The higher PSE indicated a stronger negative bias in high social anxiety. State affect modified this relationship, with high social anxiety associated with stronger negative biases, but only for individuals with greater negative affect. State affect and trait anxiety interacted such that social anxiety status alone was insufficient to fully characterize perceptual biases. This raises several issues such as the need to consider what constitutes an appropriate control group and the need to consider state affect in social anxiety. Importantly, our results suggest compensatory effects may counteract the influences of negative mood in individuals low in social anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12642024/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145589141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sohrab Ferdowsi, Leila Sara Eppenberger, Safa Mohanna, Oliver Pfäffli, Christoph Amstutz, Lucas M Bachmann, Michael A Thiel, Martin K Schmid
We provide an automated characterization of human retinal cells, i.e., RPE's based on the non-invasive AO-TFI retinal imaging and PR's based on the non-invasive AO-FI retinal imaging on a large-scale study involving 171 confirmed healthy eyes from 104 participants of 23 to 80 years old. Comprehensive standard checkups based on SD-OCT and Fondus imaging modalities were carried out by Ophthalmologists from the Luzerner Kantonsspital (LUKS) to confirm the absence of retinal pathologies. AO imaging imaging was performed using the Cellularis® device and each eye was imaged at various retinal eccentricities. The images were automatically segmented using a dedicated software and RPE and PR cells were identified and morphometric characterizations, such as cell density and area were computed. The results were stratified based on various criteria, such as age, retinal eccentricity, visual acuity, etc. The automatic segmentation was validated independently on a held-out set by five trained medical students not involved in this study. We plotted cell density variations as a function of eccentricity from the fovea along both nasal and temporal directions. For RPE cells, no consistent trend in density was observed between 0° to 9° eccentricity, contrasting with established histological literature demonstrating foveal density peaks. In contrast, PR cell density showed a clear decrease from 2.5° to 9°. RPE cell density declined linearly with age, whereas no age-related pattern was detected for PR cell density. On average, RPE cell density was found to be ≈6313 cells/mm2 (±σ=757), while the average PR cell density was calculated as ≈10,207 cells/mm2 (±σ=1273).
{"title":"In-Vivo Characterization of Healthy Retinal Pigment Epithelium and Photoreceptor Cells from AO-(T)FI Imaging.","authors":"Sohrab Ferdowsi, Leila Sara Eppenberger, Safa Mohanna, Oliver Pfäffli, Christoph Amstutz, Lucas M Bachmann, Michael A Thiel, Martin K Schmid","doi":"10.3390/vision9040091","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vision9040091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We provide an automated characterization of human retinal cells, i.e., RPE's based on the non-invasive AO-TFI retinal imaging and PR's based on the non-invasive AO-FI retinal imaging on a large-scale study involving 171 confirmed healthy eyes from 104 participants of 23 to 80 years old. Comprehensive standard checkups based on SD-OCT and Fondus imaging modalities were carried out by Ophthalmologists from the Luzerner Kantonsspital (LUKS) to confirm the absence of retinal pathologies. AO imaging imaging was performed using the Cellularis<sup>®</sup> device and each eye was imaged at various retinal eccentricities. The images were automatically segmented using a dedicated software and RPE and PR cells were identified and morphometric characterizations, such as cell density and area were computed. The results were stratified based on various criteria, such as age, retinal eccentricity, visual acuity, etc. The automatic segmentation was validated independently on a held-out set by five trained medical students not involved in this study. We plotted cell density variations as a function of eccentricity from the fovea along both nasal and temporal directions. For RPE cells, no consistent trend in density was observed between 0° to 9° eccentricity, contrasting with established histological literature demonstrating foveal density peaks. In contrast, PR cell density showed a clear decrease from 2.5° to 9°. RPE cell density declined linearly with age, whereas no age-related pattern was detected for PR cell density. On average, RPE cell density was found to be ≈6313 cells/mm<sup>2</sup> (±σ=757), while the average PR cell density was calculated as ≈10,207 cells/mm<sup>2</sup> (±σ=1273).</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12641776/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145589115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This paper aims to provide an overview of corneal birefringence (CB), systematize the knowledge and current understanding of CB, and identify difficulties associated with introducing CB into mainstream clinical practice.
Methods: Literature reviews were conducted, seeking articles focused on CB published between the early 19th century and the present time. Secondary-level searches were made examining relevant publications referred to in primary-level publications, ranging back to the early 17th century. The key search words were "corneal birefringence" and "non-invasive measurements".
Results: CB was first recorded by Brewster in 1815. Orthogonally polarized rays travel at different speeds through the cornea, creating a slow axis and a fast axis. The slow axis aligns with the pattern of most corneal stromal collagen fibrils. In vivo, it is oriented along the superior temporal-inferior nasal direction at an angle of about 25° (with an approximate range of -54° to 90°) from the horizontal. CB has been reported to (i) influence the estimation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness; (ii) be affected by corneal interventions; (iii) be altered in keratoconus; (iv) vary along the depth of the cornea; and (v) be affected by intra-ocular pressure.
Conclusions: Under precisely controlled conditions, capturing the CB pattern is the first step in a non-destructive process used to model the ultra-fine structure of the individual cornea, and changes thereof, in vivo.
{"title":"Birefringence of the Human Cornea: A Review.","authors":"Sudi Patel, Larysa Tutchenko, Igor Dmytruk","doi":"10.3390/vision9040090","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vision9040090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper aims to provide an overview of corneal birefringence (CB), systematize the knowledge and current understanding of CB, and identify difficulties associated with introducing CB into mainstream clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature reviews were conducted, seeking articles focused on CB published between the early 19th century and the present time. Secondary-level searches were made examining relevant publications referred to in primary-level publications, ranging back to the early 17th century. The key search words were \"corneal birefringence\" and \"non-invasive measurements\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CB was first recorded by Brewster in 1815. Orthogonally polarized rays travel at different speeds through the cornea, creating a slow axis and a fast axis. The slow axis aligns with the pattern of most corneal stromal collagen fibrils. In vivo, it is oriented along the superior temporal-inferior nasal direction at an angle of about 25° (with an approximate range of -54° to 90°) from the horizontal. CB has been reported to (i) influence the estimation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness; (ii) be affected by corneal interventions; (iii) be altered in keratoconus; (iv) vary along the depth of the cornea; and (v) be affected by intra-ocular pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under precisely controlled conditions, capturing the CB pattern is the first step in a non-destructive process used to model the ultra-fine structure of the individual cornea, and changes thereof, in vivo.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12641804/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145589108","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ngozika Esther Ezinne, Shinead Phagoo, Ameera Roopnarinesingh, Michael Agyemang Kwarteng
Purpose: This study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated risk factors of keratoconus (KC) among high school students in Couva, Trinidad and Tobago. Method: A cross-sectional, school-based approach was used, involving a simple random sampling technique to select schools and students. A structured questionnaire assessed KC risk factors, while clinical assessments, including visual acuity, refraction, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and topography, were performed. Data were analyzed using R. Exact tests were used for KC (n = 2 cases) and robust Poisson regression estimated adjusted prevalence ratios for the 'at-risk' screening endpoint. Results: A total of 432 students aged 12-17 years participated, with a response rate of 97.5%. Most participants were of East Indian descent (48.1%), female (52.1%), and 14 years old (23.1%). Approximately 47.7% (95% CI 43.0-52.5%) were at risk of KC, with 0.5% (2/432; exact 95% CI 0.06-1.67%) diagnosed with the condition. The most common risk factors were eye rubbing (87.4%), over eight hours of sun exposure weekly (71.8%), and atopy (68.4%). KC was observed to be significantly higher among people with a family history (p = 0.018). Conclusions: The study highlights a low prevalence and a high risk of KC among high school students, with a strong link to family history and common risk factors such as eye rubbing and sun exposure. These findings emphasize the urgent need for regular KC screening in schools to ensure early diagnosis and effective management.
目的:本研究旨在了解圆锥角膜(KC)在特立尼达和多巴哥库瓦高中学生中的患病率及其相关危险因素。方法:采用横断面、以学校为基础的方法,采用简单的随机抽样技术选择学校和学生。结构化问卷评估KC的危险因素,同时进行临床评估,包括视力、屈光、裂隙灯生物显微镜和地形。数据使用r进行分析,对KC (n = 2例)使用精确检验,稳健泊松回归估计“高危”筛查终点的校正患病率。结果:共有432名12-17岁的学生参与,回复率为97.5%。大多数参与者为东印度裔(48.1%)、女性(52.1%)和14岁(23.1%)。大约47.7% (95% CI 43.0-52.5%)的患者有KC的风险,其中0.5%(2/432;确切95% CI 0.06-1.67%)的患者被诊断为KC。最常见的危险因素是揉眼(87.4%)、每周日晒超过8小时(71.8%)和过敏性(68.4%)。KC在有家族病史的人群中显著升高(p = 0.018)。结论:该研究强调了KC在高中生中的低患病率和高风险,与家族史和常见的风险因素(如眼睛摩擦和阳光照射)有很强的联系。这些发现强调了在学校定期进行KC筛查以确保早期诊断和有效管理的迫切需要。
{"title":"Prevalence of Keratoconus and Associated Risk Factors Among High School Students in Couva, Trinidad: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Ngozika Esther Ezinne, Shinead Phagoo, Ameera Roopnarinesingh, Michael Agyemang Kwarteng","doi":"10.3390/vision9040089","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vision9040089","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated risk factors of keratoconus (KC) among high school students in Couva, Trinidad and Tobago. <b>Method:</b> A cross-sectional, school-based approach was used, involving a simple random sampling technique to select schools and students. A structured questionnaire assessed KC risk factors, while clinical assessments, including visual acuity, refraction, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and topography, were performed. Data were analyzed using R. Exact tests were used for KC (<i>n</i> = 2 cases) and robust Poisson regression estimated adjusted prevalence ratios for the 'at-risk' screening endpoint. <b>Results:</b> A total of 432 students aged 12-17 years participated, with a response rate of 97.5%. Most participants were of East Indian descent (48.1%), female (52.1%), and 14 years old (23.1%). Approximately 47.7% (95% CI 43.0-52.5%) were at risk of KC, with 0.5% (2/432; exact 95% CI 0.06-1.67%) diagnosed with the condition. The most common risk factors were eye rubbing (87.4%), over eight hours of sun exposure weekly (71.8%), and atopy (68.4%). KC was observed to be significantly higher among people with a family history (<i>p</i> = 0.018). <b>Conclusions:</b> The study highlights a low prevalence and a high risk of KC among high school students, with a strong link to family history and common risk factors such as eye rubbing and sun exposure. These findings emphasize the urgent need for regular KC screening in schools to ensure early diagnosis and effective management.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12551074/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Face recognition is an important skill that helps people make social judgments by identifying both who a person is and other characteristics such as their expression, age, and ethnicity. Previous models of face processing, such as those proposed by Bruce and Young and by Haxby and colleagues, suggest that identity and other facial features are processed through partly independent systems. This study aimed to compare the efficiency with which different facial characteristics are processed in a visual search task. Participants viewed arrays of two, four, or six faces and judged whether one face differed from the others. Four tasks were created, focusing separately on identity, expression, ethnicity, and gender. We found that search times were significantly longer when looking for identity and shorter when looking for ethnicity. Significant correlations were found among almost all tests in all outcome variables. Comparison of target-present and target-absent trials suggested that performance in none of the tests seems to follow a serial-search-terminating model. These results suggest that different facial characteristics share early processing but differentiate into independent recognition mechanisms at a later stage.
{"title":"Comparing Visual Search Efficiency Across Different Facial Characteristics.","authors":"Navdeep Kaur, Isabella Hooge, Andrea Albonico","doi":"10.3390/vision9040088","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vision9040088","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Face recognition is an important skill that helps people make social judgments by identifying both who a person is and other characteristics such as their expression, age, and ethnicity. Previous models of face processing, such as those proposed by Bruce and Young and by Haxby and colleagues, suggest that identity and other facial features are processed through partly independent systems. This study aimed to compare the efficiency with which different facial characteristics are processed in a visual search task. Participants viewed arrays of two, four, or six faces and judged whether one face differed from the others. Four tasks were created, focusing separately on identity, expression, ethnicity, and gender. We found that search times were significantly longer when looking for identity and shorter when looking for ethnicity. Significant correlations were found among almost all tests in all outcome variables. Comparison of target-present and target-absent trials suggested that performance in none of the tests seems to follow a serial-search-terminating model. These results suggest that different facial characteristics share early processing but differentiate into independent recognition mechanisms at a later stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12550928/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Glaucoma management relies on lowering intraocular pressure (IOP), but determining the target reduction at presentation is challenging, particularly in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). We developed and internally validated a neural network regression model using retrospective clinical data from Qiu et al. (2015), including 270 patients (118 with NTG). A single-layer artificial neural network with five nodes was trained in MATLAB R2024b using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Inputs included demographic, refractive, structural, and functional parameters, with IOP reduction as the output. Data were split into 65% training, 15% validation, and 20% testing, with training repeated 10 times. Model performance was strong and consistent (average RMSE: 1.90 ± 0.29 training, 2.18 ± 0.34 validation, 2.11 ± 0.30 testing; Pearson's r: 0.92 ± 0.02, 0.88 ± 0.02, 0.88 ± 0.04). The best-performing model achieved RMSEs of 1.57, 2.90, and 1.77 with r values of 0.93, 0.91, and 0.93, respectively. Feature ablation revealed significant contributions from IOP, axial length, CCT, diagnosis, VCDR, spherical equivalent, mean deviation, and laterality. This study demonstrates that a simple neural network can reliably predict individualized IOP reduction targets, supporting personalized glaucoma management and improved outcomes.
{"title":"Development of a Neural Network to Predict Optimal IOP Reduction in Glaucoma Management.","authors":"Raheem Remtulla, Sidrat Rahman, Hady Saheb","doi":"10.3390/vision9040087","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vision9040087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glaucoma management relies on lowering intraocular pressure (IOP), but determining the target reduction at presentation is challenging, particularly in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG). We developed and internally validated a neural network regression model using retrospective clinical data from Qiu et al. (2015), including 270 patients (118 with NTG). A single-layer artificial neural network with five nodes was trained in MATLAB R2024b using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. Inputs included demographic, refractive, structural, and functional parameters, with IOP reduction as the output. Data were split into 65% training, 15% validation, and 20% testing, with training repeated 10 times. Model performance was strong and consistent (average RMSE: 1.90 ± 0.29 training, 2.18 ± 0.34 validation, 2.11 ± 0.30 testing; Pearson's r: 0.92 ± 0.02, 0.88 ± 0.02, 0.88 ± 0.04). The best-performing model achieved RMSEs of 1.57, 2.90, and 1.77 with r values of 0.93, 0.91, and 0.93, respectively. Feature ablation revealed significant contributions from IOP, axial length, CCT, diagnosis, VCDR, spherical equivalent, mean deviation, and laterality. This study demonstrates that a simple neural network can reliably predict individualized IOP reduction targets, supporting personalized glaucoma management and improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12551081/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marco Zeppieri, Caterina Gagliano, Francesco Cappellani, Federico Visalli, Fabiana D'Esposito, Alessandro Avitabile, Roberta Amato, Alessandra Cuna, Francesco Pellegrini
Background: This study compared the performance of a Head-mounted Virtual Reality Perimeter (HVRP) with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), the standard in automated perimetry. The HFA is the established standard for automated perimetry but is constrained by lengthy testing, bulky equipment, and limited patient comfort. Comparative data on newer head-mounted virtual reality perimeters are limited, leaving uncertainty about their clinical reliability and potential advantages. Aim: The aim was to evaluate parameters such as visual field outcomes, portability, patient comfort, eye tracking, and usability. Methods: Participants underwent testing with both devices, assessing metrics like mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and duration. Results: The HVRP demonstrated small but statistically significant differences in MD and PSD compared to the HFA, while maintaining a consistent trend across participants. MD values were slightly more negative for HFA than HVRP (average difference -0.60 dB, p = 0.0006), while pattern standard deviation was marginally higher with HFA (average difference 0.38 dB, p = 0.00018). Although statistically significant, these differences were small in magnitude and do not undermine the clinical utility or reproducibility of the device. Notably, HVRP showed markedly shorter testing times with HVRP (7.15 vs. 18.11 min, mean difference 10.96 min, p < 0.0001). Its lightweight, portable design allowed for bedside and home testing, enhancing accessibility for pediatric, geriatric, and mobility-impaired patients. Participants reported greater comfort due to the headset design, which eliminated the need for chin rests. The device also offers potential for AI integration and remote data analysis. Conclusions: The HVRP proved to be a reliable, user-friendly alternative to traditional perimetry. Its advantages in comfort, portability, and test efficiency support its use in both clinical settings and remote screening programs for visual field assessment. Its portability and user-friendly design support broader use in clinical practice and expand possibilities for bedside assessment, home monitoring, and remote screening, particularly in populations with limited access to conventional perimetry.
背景:本研究比较了头戴式虚拟现实周界(HVRP)与自动周界测量标准Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA)的性能。HFA是自动视野检查的既定标准,但受到测试时间长、设备笨重和患者舒适度有限的限制。新的头戴式虚拟现实周边的比较数据有限,留下了不确定的临床可靠性和潜在的优势。目的:目的是评估诸如视野结果、便携性、患者舒适度、眼动追踪和可用性等参数。方法:参与者接受两种设备的测试,评估指标如平均偏差(MD)、模式标准差(PSD)和持续时间。结果:与HFA相比,HVRP在MD和PSD方面表现出较小但具有统计学意义的差异,同时在参与者中保持一致的趋势。HFA的MD值略高于HVRP(平均差值-0.60 dB, p = 0.0006),而HFA的模式标准差略高于HVRP(平均差值0.38 dB, p = 0.00018)。虽然具有统计学意义,但这些差异幅度很小,不会影响该装置的临床实用性或可重复性。值得注意的是,HVRP与HVRP的检测时间明显缩短(7.15 vs. 18.11 min,平均差10.96 min, p < 0.0001)。其轻巧、便携的设计允许床边和家庭测试,提高儿童、老年人和行动不便患者的可及性。参与者报告说,由于耳机的设计更舒适,不需要下巴托。该设备还提供了人工智能集成和远程数据分析的潜力。结论:HVRP被证明是一个可靠的,用户友好的替代传统的视野。它在舒适性、便携性和测试效率方面的优势支持它在临床环境和远程视野评估筛查项目中的使用。它的便携性和用户友好的设计支持在临床实践中更广泛的应用,并扩大了床边评估、家庭监测和远程筛查的可能性,特别是在无法获得常规视野检查的人群中。
{"title":"Clinical Assessment of a Virtual Reality Perimeter Versus the Humphrey Field Analyzer: Comparative Reliability, Usability, and Prospective Applications.","authors":"Marco Zeppieri, Caterina Gagliano, Francesco Cappellani, Federico Visalli, Fabiana D'Esposito, Alessandro Avitabile, Roberta Amato, Alessandra Cuna, Francesco Pellegrini","doi":"10.3390/vision9040086","DOIUrl":"10.3390/vision9040086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> This study compared the performance of a Head-mounted Virtual Reality Perimeter (HVRP) with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA), the standard in automated perimetry. The HFA is the established standard for automated perimetry but is constrained by lengthy testing, bulky equipment, and limited patient comfort. Comparative data on newer head-mounted virtual reality perimeters are limited, leaving uncertainty about their clinical reliability and potential advantages. <i>Aim:</i> The aim was to evaluate parameters such as visual field outcomes, portability, patient comfort, eye tracking, and usability. <i>Methods:</i> Participants underwent testing with both devices, assessing metrics like mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and duration. <i>Results:</i> The HVRP demonstrated small but statistically significant differences in MD and PSD compared to the HFA, while maintaining a consistent trend across participants. MD values were slightly more negative for HFA than HVRP (average difference -0.60 dB, <i>p</i> = 0.0006), while pattern standard deviation was marginally higher with HFA (average difference 0.38 dB, <i>p</i> = 0.00018). Although statistically significant, these differences were small in magnitude and do not undermine the clinical utility or reproducibility of the device. Notably, HVRP showed markedly shorter testing times with HVRP (7.15 vs. 18.11 min, mean difference 10.96 min, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Its lightweight, portable design allowed for bedside and home testing, enhancing accessibility for pediatric, geriatric, and mobility-impaired patients. Participants reported greater comfort due to the headset design, which eliminated the need for chin rests. The device also offers potential for AI integration and remote data analysis. <i>Conclusions:</i> The HVRP proved to be a reliable, user-friendly alternative to traditional perimetry. Its advantages in comfort, portability, and test efficiency support its use in both clinical settings and remote screening programs for visual field assessment. Its portability and user-friendly design support broader use in clinical practice and expand possibilities for bedside assessment, home monitoring, and remote screening, particularly in populations with limited access to conventional perimetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":36586,"journal":{"name":"Vision (Switzerland)","volume":"9 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12550896/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145356291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}