首页 > 最新文献

Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii最新文献

英文 中文
On paleoepidemiology of spina bifida sacralis: prevalence of the anomaly in Late Scythians of lower Dnieper region 骶骨裂的古流行病学研究:第聂伯河下游地区晚期斯基泰人的异常患病率
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-11
M. Karapetian
Spina bifida is a developmental anomaly that is thought to be caused by a combination of hereditary and en-vironmental factors. Though the most significant association was found with the folic acid deficit during early em-bryogenesis, numerous genetic variants were also found to be in some association with the development of neu-ral tube defects, but this data is inconsistent. It is still debated whether the unremarkable anomaly (spina bifida occulta) often observed in osteological samples is truly a form of neural tube defects forming in early embryo-genesis, or is a minor variation that is forming later in postnatal life. Also, data is equivocal regarding the neuro-logical consequences of sacral spina bifida occulta, some pointing to its clinical significance, others stating that it does not affect the wellbeing in any way. Though paleopathological studies on spina bifida are numerous, the frequency of the anomaly remains largely unknown for the Early Iron Age population of the Eurasian steppes. This study examines presence of sacral spina bifida in a Late Scynthian sample (3rd c. BC — 3rd с. AD) from the northern Black Sea region. Totally, 89 skeletons were examined, originating from cemeteries near Nikolayevka and Zolotaya Balka villages (Kherson Oblast, Ukrain). These cemeteries are located along the Dnieper river bank about 90 km apart. The people they represent were settled agriculturalists. The defect was scored when either or all of the three upper sacral vertebrae were affected (S1–S3), its level was recorded. Totally, 16 % of individuals were affected. The majority of defects were observed solely on S1 level. Only two cases of spina bifida sacralis totalis were recorded. The frequency of the anomaly was not significantly different either between males and fe-males, or between younger (<35 years) and older (>35 years) adults. In two instances, two individuals buried in a common grave both had spina bifida sacralis which may point to a biological relationship between them. The fre-quency of spina bifida sacralis is very close to the mean values, reported in the literature. Thus, no evidence of an increased selection against individuals in this group with this form of skeletal anomaly, or a significant impact of envi-ronmental factors, leading to its development in ontogenesis, is present. Also, contrary to literature data, it seems that in this sample age and sex were not the factors significantly contributing to the trait’s variation, though the age dynamics of this trait needs further consideration using a sample with higher proportion of senile individuals.
脊柱裂是一种发育异常,被认为是由遗传和环境因素共同引起的。虽然在胚胎发育早期发现了叶酸缺乏最显著的关联,但也发现了许多遗传变异与神经管缺陷的发展有一定的关联,但这些数据不一致。通常在骨标本中观察到的不明显的异常(隐性脊柱裂)是否真的是早期胚胎发育中形成的神经管缺陷的一种形式,或者是在出生后生命后期形成的一种微小变异,仍然存在争议。此外,关于骶椎隐性脊柱裂的神经系统后果的数据是模棱两可的,一些人指出它的临床意义,另一些人说它不会以任何方式影响健康。尽管关于脊柱裂的古病理学研究有很多,但在欧亚草原的早期铁器时代人群中,这种异常的频率仍然很大程度上是未知的。本研究探讨了晚期辛泰人样本(公元前3世纪-公元前3世纪)中骶骨脊柱裂的存在。公元)来自黑海北部地区。总共检查了来自Nikolayevka和Zolotaya Balka村(乌克兰赫尔松州)附近墓地的89具骷髅。这些墓地位于第聂伯河沿岸,相距约90公里。他们所代表的人都是定居下来的农民。当三个上骶骨(S1-S3)有一个或全部受到影响时,对缺损进行评分,并记录其水平。总共有16%的人受到影响。大多数缺陷仅在S1级被观察到。本组仅记录2例完全性骶部脊柱裂。异常的频率在男性和女性之间,以及在年轻(35岁)的成年人之间没有显著差异。在两个例子中,葬在同一个坟墓里的两个人都患有骶骨裂,这可能表明他们之间存在生物学关系。骶骨裂的发生频率与文献报道的平均值非常接近。因此,目前没有证据表明,在这一群体中,有这种形式的骨骼异常的个体受到了更多的选择,也没有证据表明环境因素的重大影响导致了其在个体发育中的发展。此外,与文献数据相反,在该样本中,年龄和性别似乎不是显著影响该性状变异的因素,尽管使用老年个体比例更高的样本时,该性状的年龄动态需要进一步考虑。
{"title":"On paleoepidemiology of spina bifida sacralis: prevalence of the anomaly in Late Scythians of lower Dnieper region","authors":"M. Karapetian","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-11","url":null,"abstract":"Spina bifida is a developmental anomaly that is thought to be caused by a combination of hereditary and en-vironmental factors. Though the most significant association was found with the folic acid deficit during early em-bryogenesis, numerous genetic variants were also found to be in some association with the development of neu-ral tube defects, but this data is inconsistent. It is still debated whether the unremarkable anomaly (spina bifida occulta) often observed in osteological samples is truly a form of neural tube defects forming in early embryo-genesis, or is a minor variation that is forming later in postnatal life. Also, data is equivocal regarding the neuro-logical consequences of sacral spina bifida occulta, some pointing to its clinical significance, others stating that it does not affect the wellbeing in any way. Though paleopathological studies on spina bifida are numerous, the frequency of the anomaly remains largely unknown for the Early Iron Age population of the Eurasian steppes. This study examines presence of sacral spina bifida in a Late Scynthian sample (3rd c. BC — 3rd с. AD) from the northern Black Sea region. Totally, 89 skeletons were examined, originating from cemeteries near Nikolayevka and Zolotaya Balka villages (Kherson Oblast, Ukrain). These cemeteries are located along the Dnieper river bank about 90 km apart. The people they represent were settled agriculturalists. The defect was scored when either or all of the three upper sacral vertebrae were affected (S1–S3), its level was recorded. Totally, 16 % of individuals were affected. The majority of defects were observed solely on S1 level. Only two cases of spina bifida sacralis totalis were recorded. The frequency of the anomaly was not significantly different either between males and fe-males, or between younger (<35 years) and older (>35 years) adults. In two instances, two individuals buried in a common grave both had spina bifida sacralis which may point to a biological relationship between them. The fre-quency of spina bifida sacralis is very close to the mean values, reported in the literature. Thus, no evidence of an increased selection against individuals in this group with this form of skeletal anomaly, or a significant impact of envi-ronmental factors, leading to its development in ontogenesis, is present. Also, contrary to literature data, it seems that in this sample age and sex were not the factors significantly contributing to the trait’s variation, though the age dynamics of this trait needs further consideration using a sample with higher proportion of senile individuals.","PeriodicalId":36692,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78852104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
To the study of economic activities of the population of the Saka period in Central Kazakhstan (on the materials of traceological studies) 对哈萨克斯坦中部萨卡时期人口经济活动的研究(基于足迹学研究材料)
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-4
A. Beisenov, I. V. Gorashchuk
The Tasmola Culture of Central Kazakhstan, dated to the 8th–5th centuries BC, was discovered more than half a century ago by M.K. Kadyrbaev. He studied dozens of kurgans, on the materials of which he characterized the mortuary rites and funerary equipment of the new culture at a high professional level. On the basis of the materials from the burial sites, he for the first time considered the features of the economic activity of the population of the Saka period in Central Kazakhstan. Recent materials, including those obtained from the settlements, make it possible to largely extend the existing conclusions and assumptions of those years. At the settlement of Abylai, located in the territory of the Karaganda Region of the Republic of Kazakhstan, six seasons of archaeological excavations were carried out in 2016–2021. First results of the traceological analysis of stone tools from this site have already been published by the authors. In this paper, we report the results of the traceological study of a new series of stone tools from the Abylai settlement. In 2021, 254 stone objects were examined, functions of 202 of which were determined. As the analysis showed, 185 tools were used in various economic areas. The remaining 15 items were identified as kitchen utensils; there was also one mortar for grinding paints and one small altar (‘credence’), which is very often found in the burials of this culture. The 185 tools are divided into 5 classes, each of which belongs to a certain area of economic activity (ancient industries). Among those, 92 articles (49.73 % of the total number) are tools for the earthworks. Fifty articles (27.03 %) belong to the class of grinding tools. These are pestles and upper and lower grindstones, which were used for grinding plant products. Next 26 tools (14.05 %) were used in the processing of skins (tanning industry). Thirteen tools (7.03 %) were used in metalworking, including the work with iron products. Four tools (2.16 %) were used to process bone and wood. Among the results obtained, of a particular importance are the finds of numerous hoes and grating tools, as well as tools for metalworking, on which traces of iron surface are clearly identified. In addition to the whetstones, used for dressing knives and other iron objects, the new series of tools contains stone anvils, on the working surface of which some iron scale preserves.
哈萨克斯坦中部的塔斯莫拉文化可追溯至公元前8 - 5世纪,半个多世纪前由卡迪尔巴耶夫(M.K. Kadyrbaev)发现。他研究了几十件库尔干,在材料上对新文化的丧葬仪式和丧葬器具进行了高度专业的刻画。根据墓葬遗址的材料,他首次考虑了哈萨克斯坦中部萨卡时期人口经济活动的特征。最近的材料,包括从定居点获得的材料,使人们有可能在很大程度上扩展那些年的现有结论和假设。在位于哈萨克斯坦共和国卡拉干达地区境内的阿比莱定居点,2016-2021年进行了六个季节的考古发掘。作者已经发表了对该遗址石制工具的初步痕迹分析结果。在本文中,我们报告了对阿比莱定居点一系列新的石器的痕迹学研究结果。2021年,对254件石头进行了检查,确定了其中202件的功能。分析显示,185种工具被用于不同的经济领域。其余15件物品经鉴定为厨房用具;还有一个用于研磨颜料的灰浆和一个小祭坛(“credence”),这在这种文化的墓葬中很常见。这185种工具被分为5类,每一类都属于一定的经济活动领域(古代工业)。其中土方工程工具92件(49.73%)。50件(27.03%)属于磨具类。这些是杵和上下磨石,用于研磨工厂产品。接下来的26种工具(14.05%)用于皮革加工(制革工业)。13种工具(7.03%)用于金属加工,包括铁制品加工。四种工具(2.16%)用于加工骨头和木材。在获得的结果中,特别重要的是发现了许多锄头和格栅工具,以及金属加工工具,在这些工具上可以清楚地识别出铁表面的痕迹。除了用于修整刀具和其他铁器的磨刀石外,新系列的工具还包括石砧,在其工作表面保留了一些铁垢。
{"title":"To the study of economic activities of the population of the Saka period in Central Kazakhstan (on the materials of traceological studies)","authors":"A. Beisenov, I. V. Gorashchuk","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-4","url":null,"abstract":"The Tasmola Culture of Central Kazakhstan, dated to the 8th–5th centuries BC, was discovered more than half a century ago by M.K. Kadyrbaev. He studied dozens of kurgans, on the materials of which he characterized the mortuary rites and funerary equipment of the new culture at a high professional level. On the basis of the materials from the burial sites, he for the first time considered the features of the economic activity of the population of the Saka period in Central Kazakhstan. Recent materials, including those obtained from the settlements, make it possible to largely extend the existing conclusions and assumptions of those years. At the settlement of Abylai, located in the territory of the Karaganda Region of the Republic of Kazakhstan, six seasons of archaeological excavations were carried out in 2016–2021. First results of the traceological analysis of stone tools from this site have already been published by the authors. In this paper, we report the results of the traceological study of a new series of stone tools from the Abylai settlement. In 2021, 254 stone objects were examined, functions of 202 of which were determined. As the analysis showed, 185 tools were used in various economic areas. The remaining 15 items were identified as kitchen utensils; there was also one mortar for grinding paints and one small altar (‘credence’), which is very often found in the burials of this culture. The 185 tools are divided into 5 classes, each of which belongs to a certain area of economic activity (ancient industries). Among those, 92 articles (49.73 % of the total number) are tools for the earthworks. Fifty articles (27.03 %) belong to the class of grinding tools. These are pestles and upper and lower grindstones, which were used for grinding plant products. Next 26 tools (14.05 %) were used in the processing of skins (tanning industry). Thirteen tools (7.03 %) were used in metalworking, including the work with iron products. Four tools (2.16 %) were used to process bone and wood. Among the results obtained, of a particular importance are the finds of numerous hoes and grating tools, as well as tools for metalworking, on which traces of iron surface are clearly identified. In addition to the whetstones, used for dressing knives and other iron objects, the new series of tools contains stone anvils, on the working surface of which some iron scale preserves.","PeriodicalId":36692,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76161971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
How people perceive their role in the natural environment. The Primorye paradox 人们如何看待自己在自然环境中的角色。滨海区悖论
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-15
A. Pozanenko
In the North, Siberia and the Far East, most villagers live in close connection with nature, primarily through using renewable natural resources. However, there is hardly any coverage in literature as to how people position themselves in relation to the surrounding nature. Even when the issue is raised, it addresses only indigenous peoples, and not all local inhabitants without reference to ethnicity. People living in different types of localities tend to have dissimilar perceptions of their role in the natural environment. For urban residents, we propose dis-tinguishing four main self-perception types: outsider (stays away from nature), visitor (e.g., holidaymakers, athletes, and tourists), user (e.g., anglers and gatherers of wild plants), and protector (various eco-activists). Residents of small towns and densely populated rural areas tend to perceive themselves mainly as users. Where the population density is low and natural resources are vital for sustenance, the basic perceptions are master and son. Masters believe they have exclusive rights to use the surrounding natural resources and claim to be doing it responsibly. Perceiving oneself as a son is mostly common for indigenous peoples; their discourse about respect for nature stems not only from a rational, but also sacred attitude. Field research on the east coast of Primorye revealed a self-perception untypical for villagers. Many locals call themselves thieves of natural resources. This means the subjective perception, and not objective differences in practices (doing the same thing, a person in the Russian North can consider himself a master, in Altai — a son, and in Primorye — a thief). We propose three reasons for this “Primorye paradox”. 1) Weak rootedness of the local population, spurring its turnover, which, in turn, makes it difficult to integrate into the natural landscape. 2) Saturation of the surroundings with outsiders, preventing to perceive the territory as “one's own”. The main outsiders are seasonal fishing crews from elsewhere; the Chinese; and crews of North Korean fishing vessels, whom the border guards treat more loyally than the local fishermen. 3) Constant pressure from the supervisory authorities. Primorye has a high concentration of hunting, plant, and aquatic biological resources. Business based on procuring natural resources is profitable, but according to the State, it is mostly illegal. If one can remain unnoticed in the taiga, on the water such chances are next to none. The situation is aggravated by a variety of specially regulated territories (federal and regional protected areas, maritime frontier regime, hunting grounds with different status), which expands the range of supervisory authorities.
在北方、西伯利亚和远东,大多数村民主要通过使用可再生的自然资源与自然密切联系。然而,在文学中几乎没有任何关于人们如何定位自己与周围自然的关系的报道。即使提出了这个问题,它也只是针对土著人民,而不是所有当地居民,没有提及种族。生活在不同地区的人们往往对自己在自然环境中的作用有不同的认识。对于城市居民,我们建议区分四种主要的自我感知类型:局外人(远离自然)、游客(如度假者、运动员和游客)、使用者(如垂钓者和野生植物采集者)和保护者(各种生态活动家)。小城镇和人口稠密的农村地区的居民往往认为自己主要是用户。在人口密度低、自然资源对维持生计至关重要的地方,人们的基本观念是主人和儿子。马斯特斯认为他们拥有使用周围自然资源的专有权,并声称自己是负责任的。土著人民普遍认为自己是儿子;他们关于尊重自然的话语不仅源于理性,而且源于神圣的态度。在滨海边疆区东海岸进行的实地调查显示,村民的自我认知并不典型。许多当地人称自己是自然资源的窃贼。这意味着主观的认知,而不是客观的实践差异(做同样的事情,一个人在俄罗斯北部可以认为自己是主人,在阿尔泰可以认为自己是儿子,在滨海边区可以认为自己是小偷)。对于这种“滨海悖论”,我们提出了三个原因。1)当地人口的根性较弱,导致人口流动,难以融入自然景观。2)外部环境的饱和,防止将领土视为“自己的”。主要的外来者是来自其他地方的季节性捕鱼队;中国;以及朝鲜渔船的船员,边防军对待他们比对待当地渔民更忠诚。3)来自监管部门的持续压力。滨海有高度集中的狩猎、植物和水生生物资源。以获取自然资源为基础的商业是有利可图的,但根据国家的说法,这大多是非法的。如果一个人能在针叶林中不被注意,那么在水面上这样的机会几乎为零。各种特别管制的领土(联邦和地区保护区、海上边界制度、不同地位的狩猎场)扩大了监督当局的范围,使情况更加恶化。
{"title":"How people perceive their role in the natural environment. The Primorye paradox","authors":"A. Pozanenko","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-15","url":null,"abstract":"In the North, Siberia and the Far East, most villagers live in close connection with nature, primarily through using renewable natural resources. However, there is hardly any coverage in literature as to how people position themselves in relation to the surrounding nature. Even when the issue is raised, it addresses only indigenous peoples, and not all local inhabitants without reference to ethnicity. People living in different types of localities tend to have dissimilar perceptions of their role in the natural environment. For urban residents, we propose dis-tinguishing four main self-perception types: outsider (stays away from nature), visitor (e.g., holidaymakers, athletes, and tourists), user (e.g., anglers and gatherers of wild plants), and protector (various eco-activists). Residents of small towns and densely populated rural areas tend to perceive themselves mainly as users. Where the population density is low and natural resources are vital for sustenance, the basic perceptions are master and son. Masters believe they have exclusive rights to use the surrounding natural resources and claim to be doing it responsibly. Perceiving oneself as a son is mostly common for indigenous peoples; their discourse about respect for nature stems not only from a rational, but also sacred attitude. Field research on the east coast of Primorye revealed a self-perception untypical for villagers. Many locals call themselves thieves of natural resources. This means the subjective perception, and not objective differences in practices (doing the same thing, a person in the Russian North can consider himself a master, in Altai — a son, and in Primorye — a thief). We propose three reasons for this “Primorye paradox”. 1) Weak rootedness of the local population, spurring its turnover, which, in turn, makes it difficult to integrate into the natural landscape. 2) Saturation of the surroundings with outsiders, preventing to perceive the territory as “one's own”. The main outsiders are seasonal fishing crews from elsewhere; the Chinese; and crews of North Korean fishing vessels, whom the border guards treat more loyally than the local fishermen. 3) Constant pressure from the supervisory authorities. Primorye has a high concentration of hunting, plant, and aquatic biological resources. Business based on procuring natural resources is profitable, but according to the State, it is mostly illegal. If one can remain unnoticed in the taiga, on the water such chances are next to none. The situation is aggravated by a variety of specially regulated territories (federal and regional protected areas, maritime frontier regime, hunting grounds with different status), which expands the range of supervisory authorities.","PeriodicalId":36692,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77630310","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Russian Frontier in Western Siberia (XVI–XVIII centuries) — an archaeological rendition 西伯利亚西部的俄罗斯边境(十六至十八世纪)-考古再现
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-7
L. Tataurova, S. Tataurov, F. S. Tataurov, K. O. Sopova
The Tara Irtysh region, including the city of Tara, as the main frontier outpost of the 17th–18th centuries, and its rural environs, is chosen as the pilot region in the study of the Russian frontier. Here, extensive archaeological material on the culture of urban and rural populations has been accumulated, and there is a representative body of written sources. The aim of this research is to study, on the basis of a complex analysis, the main deve-lopmental strategies of the Tarsky frontier: military, economic, and cultural. This will enable building a multicom-ponent model of the Russian frontier in the 16th–18th centuries for this region, identifying specifics of its forma-tion, characteristic features, markers, and dynamics of changes as prerequisites for the advancement of the state to the east and southeast. In the study of the military strategy, a special role is assigned to the analysis of defen-sive structures which, together with weapons, specifically firearms, allowed resisting the militant nomads and de-fending the bordering territories inhabited by both Russian and indigenous populations. The study of the eco-nomic strategy revealed that the Russians in a short time created their own food economy based on the develop-ment of agriculture, cattle breeding, and the use of the natural resources — forest foraging, fishing, and hunting. Military confrontations and the formation of a life sustenance system required the development of various crafts: blacksmithing, pottery making, there was a need for clothing and footwear, and for food production. Trade rela-tions were developing. The strategy of the cultural development was based on the paradigm of the Russian world — the spread of the Orthodoxy, into which the indigenous population was converted, including those serving in the Tarsky garrison. However, Muscovian authorities did not inhibit Islamization of the Tatars. Cohabitation of the Russians and Tatars facilitated the spread of the Russian language and Russian culture in the indigenous envi-ronment. This manifested in the change of the foundations of the traditional way of life of the native population, its restructuring according to the Russian model, and introduction of the advanced technologies. The Siberian Rus-sian identity was developing on this international foundation.
塔拉额尔齐斯河地区,包括塔拉市,作为17 - 18世纪的主要边境前哨,及其农村周边地区,被选为研究俄罗斯边境的试点地区。这里积累了大量关于城乡人口文化的考古资料,并有代表性的文字资料。本研究的目的是在复杂分析的基础上,研究塔斯基边境的主要发展战略:军事、经济和文化。这将有助于为该地区建立一个16 - 18世纪俄罗斯边境的多元模型,确定其形成的细节、特征、标志和变化的动态,作为国家向东和东南发展的先决条件。在军事战略研究中,对防御结构的分析具有特殊作用,这些防御结构与武器,特别是火器一起,可以抵抗好战的游牧民族,保卫俄罗斯人和土著居民居住的边界领土。对经济战略的研究表明,俄国人在短时间内以发展农业、养牛和利用自然资源——森林觅食、捕鱼和狩猎——为基础,建立了自己的粮食经济。军事对抗和生命维持系统的形成需要各种工艺的发展:锻造,制陶,需要服装和鞋类,以及食品生产。贸易关系正在发展。文化发展的战略是基于俄罗斯世界的范式——东正教的传播,土著居民皈依了东正教,包括那些在塔斯基驻军服役的人。然而,莫斯科当局并没有阻止鞑靼人的伊斯兰化。俄罗斯人和鞑靼人的同居促进了俄语和俄罗斯文化在土著环境中的传播。这表现在改变当地居民传统生活方式的基础,根据俄罗斯模式对其进行重组,并引进先进技术。西伯利亚俄罗斯人的身份认同就是在这个国际基础上发展起来的。
{"title":"The Russian Frontier in Western Siberia (XVI–XVIII centuries) — an archaeological rendition","authors":"L. Tataurova, S. Tataurov, F. S. Tataurov, K. O. Sopova","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-7","url":null,"abstract":"The Tara Irtysh region, including the city of Tara, as the main frontier outpost of the 17th–18th centuries, and its rural environs, is chosen as the pilot region in the study of the Russian frontier. Here, extensive archaeological material on the culture of urban and rural populations has been accumulated, and there is a representative body of written sources. The aim of this research is to study, on the basis of a complex analysis, the main deve-lopmental strategies of the Tarsky frontier: military, economic, and cultural. This will enable building a multicom-ponent model of the Russian frontier in the 16th–18th centuries for this region, identifying specifics of its forma-tion, characteristic features, markers, and dynamics of changes as prerequisites for the advancement of the state to the east and southeast. In the study of the military strategy, a special role is assigned to the analysis of defen-sive structures which, together with weapons, specifically firearms, allowed resisting the militant nomads and de-fending the bordering territories inhabited by both Russian and indigenous populations. The study of the eco-nomic strategy revealed that the Russians in a short time created their own food economy based on the develop-ment of agriculture, cattle breeding, and the use of the natural resources — forest foraging, fishing, and hunting. Military confrontations and the formation of a life sustenance system required the development of various crafts: blacksmithing, pottery making, there was a need for clothing and footwear, and for food production. Trade rela-tions were developing. The strategy of the cultural development was based on the paradigm of the Russian world — the spread of the Orthodoxy, into which the indigenous population was converted, including those serving in the Tarsky garrison. However, Muscovian authorities did not inhibit Islamization of the Tatars. Cohabitation of the Russians and Tatars facilitated the spread of the Russian language and Russian culture in the indigenous envi-ronment. This manifested in the change of the foundations of the traditional way of life of the native population, its restructuring according to the Russian model, and introduction of the advanced technologies. The Siberian Rus-sian identity was developing on this international foundation.","PeriodicalId":36692,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76965204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Study and analysis of the Chalcolithic Period of the Mughan Plain based on the archaeological data of Yataq-Tepesi, Northwest of Iran 基于伊朗西北部yatak - tepesi考古资料的Mughan平原铜器时代研究与分析
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-2
A. Karimikiya, R. Rezalou, A. Abedi, A. Javanmardzadeh, M. Mohammadi
The rivers, including Aras, in the Mughan region played an important role in the formation of the prehistoric sites. The Mughan Plain has not received particular attention in terms of the archaeological investigations, as the extensive scientific activities concentrated on the Lake Urmia basin. Yataq-Tepesi is a prehistoric site in the city of Germi (Mughan Region) that became the subject of the scientific research. The main aim of this paper is to discuss the pottery traditions at the site and to determine the chronological sequence of the studied region. In view of further detailed studies on the cultural relations of Mughan population with other territories, and to establish its chronological sequence, two main questions are posed: how do we date Yataq-Tepesi on the basis of cultural information, including pottery traditions? The main hypothesis suggested here is that the site development took place during the Middle Chalcolithic and Late Chalcolithic periods, somewhere between 4500 and 3700 / 3600 BC. The second question relates to the geographical regions that Yataq-Tepesi was in contact with through cultural relations and trade with other regions of northwestern Iran, especially with the region of Qaradagh and the Lake Urmia basin, as well as with the Southern Caucasus.
穆罕地区的河流,包括阿拉斯河,在史前遗址的形成中发挥了重要作用。由于广泛的科学活动集中在乌尔米亚湖盆地,Mughan平原在考古调查方面没有受到特别关注。yatak - tepesi是Germi市(Mughan地区)的一个史前遗址,成为了科学研究的主题。本文的主要目的是讨论该遗址的陶器传统,并确定研究地区的时间顺序。鉴于对Mughan人口与其他领土的文化关系的进一步详细研究,并确定其时间顺序,提出了两个主要问题:我们如何根据包括陶器传统在内的文化信息确定yatak - tepesi的年代?这里提出的主要假设是,该遗址的发展发生在中石器时代和晚石器时代,大约在公元前4500年至3700 / 3600年之间。第二个问题涉及yatak - tepesi通过文化关系和与伊朗西北部其他地区,特别是与Qaradagh地区和Urmia湖盆地以及与南高加索地区的贸易而接触的地理区域。
{"title":"Study and analysis of the Chalcolithic Period of the Mughan Plain based on the archaeological data of Yataq-Tepesi, Northwest of Iran","authors":"A. Karimikiya, R. Rezalou, A. Abedi, A. Javanmardzadeh, M. Mohammadi","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-2","url":null,"abstract":"The rivers, including Aras, in the Mughan region played an important role in the formation of the prehistoric sites. The Mughan Plain has not received particular attention in terms of the archaeological investigations, as the extensive scientific activities concentrated on the Lake Urmia basin. Yataq-Tepesi is a prehistoric site in the city of Germi (Mughan Region) that became the subject of the scientific research. The main aim of this paper is to discuss the pottery traditions at the site and to determine the chronological sequence of the studied region. In view of further detailed studies on the cultural relations of Mughan population with other territories, and to establish its chronological sequence, two main questions are posed: how do we date Yataq-Tepesi on the basis of cultural information, including pottery traditions? The main hypothesis suggested here is that the site development took place during the Middle Chalcolithic and Late Chalcolithic periods, somewhere between 4500 and 3700 / 3600 BC. The second question relates to the geographical regions that Yataq-Tepesi was in contact with through cultural relations and trade with other regions of northwestern Iran, especially with the region of Qaradagh and the Lake Urmia basin, as well as with the Southern Caucasus.","PeriodicalId":36692,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89971637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On the problem of identifying the Belkaragai type of the Neolithic ceramics in Turgai 图尔盖新石器时代陶瓷的贝尔卡拉盖型鉴定问题
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-1
I. Shevnina, A. Logvin
The settlement of Belkaragai 1 is located on the shore of a dry lake, 160 km south-west of the city of Kostanay (Kostanay Region, Northern Kazakhstan), at an altitude of 6 m from its bottom. The paper examines the materials of the settlement of Belkaragai 1, where it was possible to identify a new type of ceramics — Belkaragai. The purpose of this work is to determine the cultural and chronological affiliation of all archaeological materials obtained from site B of the settlement of Belkaragai 1. The settlement covers an area of about 15 hectares. Seve-ral accumulations of finds were recorded; one of them, designated as site B, attracted attention due to significant quantity of plates. An exploratory dig was set up; the total area of the excavation was 144 m². The analysis, synthesis, generalization, description, comparison, statistical methods, comparative typological method, and the method of analogies were used to distinguish the Belkaragai type of the Neolithic ceramics in Turgai. The raw feedstock and molding masses of the ceramic products were studied using binocular microscopy and petrographic analysis. The main feature of the Belkaragai type ceramics is the combination of the Eneolithic exterior of the vessels with the typical Mahanjar admixture of wool and animal hair in the composition of the clay dough. The Belkaragai type of ceramics accompanied a lamellar complex of stone tools, which is commensurable with the Mahanjar complex but has its own characteristics manifested in the width of the plates and composition of the tools. The peculiarities of the ceramics and flint industry allows placing chronologically the Belkaragai type of ceramics between the Mahanjar (Neolithic) and Tersek (Late Neolithic) antiquities. Besides, it should not go unnoticed that the Belkargai type may be genetically related to the Mahanjar Neolithic antiquities. As the result of the search for analogies to the Belkaragai type in the materials of other Turgai sites (the sites of Duzbay 3, Svetly Dzharkul, and the settlements of Bestamak and Buruktal 1), it was possible to identify pottery which, in terms of its main features, correlates well with the Belkaragai type. It is possible that the Belkaragai-type materials are not a local phenomenon, but have a wider character (at least within the Turgai trough). Most likely, this is a cultural phenomenon that reflects the processes that took place in Turgai at the end of the Neolithic period.
Belkaragai 1号定居点位于Kostanay市(哈萨克斯坦北部Kostanay地区)西南160公里处的一个干湖岸边,海拔6米。本文研究了Belkaragai 1号定居点的材料,在那里有可能鉴定出一种新型陶瓷- Belkaragai。这项工作的目的是确定从Belkaragai 1号定居点B遗址获得的所有考古材料的文化和年代关系。该定居点占地约15公顷。记录了几处发现的聚集;其中一个被指定为B遗址的遗址因其大量的钢板而引起了人们的注意。进行了一次探索性挖掘;挖掘总面积为144平方米。采用分析、综合、概括、描述、比较、统计方法、比较类型学方法和类比法对图尔盖新石器时代陶瓷的贝尔卡拉盖类型进行了区分。采用双目显微镜和岩相分析对陶瓷制品的原料和成型质量进行了研究。Belkaragai型陶瓷的主要特征是将器皿的新石器时代外观与典型的Mahanjar混合物(羊毛和动物毛发)结合在一起,制成粘土面团。Belkaragai类型的陶瓷伴随着一层状的石器复合体,这与Mahanjar复合体是可比较的,但在板的宽度和工具的组成上有自己的特点。陶瓷和燧石工业的特殊性使得贝尔卡拉盖类型的陶瓷按时间顺序排列在Mahanjar(新石器时代)和Tersek(新石器时代晚期)之间。此外,不应忽视的是,Belkargai类型可能与Mahanjar新石器时代的古物有遗传关系。由于在其他图尔盖遗址(Duzbay 3、Svetly Dzharkul遗址、Bestamak和Buruktal 1定居点)的材料中寻找与Belkaragai类型相似的材料,就其主要特征而言,有可能识别出与Belkaragai类型密切相关的陶器。belkaragai型物质可能不是局部现象,而是具有更广泛的特征(至少在Turgai海槽内)。最有可能的是,这是一种文化现象,反映了新石器时代末期在图尔盖发生的过程。
{"title":"On the problem of identifying the Belkaragai type of the Neolithic ceramics in Turgai","authors":"I. Shevnina, A. Logvin","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-1","url":null,"abstract":"The settlement of Belkaragai 1 is located on the shore of a dry lake, 160 km south-west of the city of Kostanay (Kostanay Region, Northern Kazakhstan), at an altitude of 6 m from its bottom. The paper examines the materials of the settlement of Belkaragai 1, where it was possible to identify a new type of ceramics — Belkaragai. The purpose of this work is to determine the cultural and chronological affiliation of all archaeological materials obtained from site B of the settlement of Belkaragai 1. The settlement covers an area of about 15 hectares. Seve-ral accumulations of finds were recorded; one of them, designated as site B, attracted attention due to significant quantity of plates. An exploratory dig was set up; the total area of the excavation was 144 m². The analysis, synthesis, generalization, description, comparison, statistical methods, comparative typological method, and the method of analogies were used to distinguish the Belkaragai type of the Neolithic ceramics in Turgai. The raw feedstock and molding masses of the ceramic products were studied using binocular microscopy and petrographic analysis. The main feature of the Belkaragai type ceramics is the combination of the Eneolithic exterior of the vessels with the typical Mahanjar admixture of wool and animal hair in the composition of the clay dough. The Belkaragai type of ceramics accompanied a lamellar complex of stone tools, which is commensurable with the Mahanjar complex but has its own characteristics manifested in the width of the plates and composition of the tools. The peculiarities of the ceramics and flint industry allows placing chronologically the Belkaragai type of ceramics between the Mahanjar (Neolithic) and Tersek (Late Neolithic) antiquities. Besides, it should not go unnoticed that the Belkargai type may be genetically related to the Mahanjar Neolithic antiquities. As the result of the search for analogies to the Belkaragai type in the materials of other Turgai sites (the sites of Duzbay 3, Svetly Dzharkul, and the settlements of Bestamak and Buruktal 1), it was possible to identify pottery which, in terms of its main features, correlates well with the Belkaragai type. It is possible that the Belkaragai-type materials are not a local phenomenon, but have a wider character (at least within the Turgai trough). Most likely, this is a cultural phenomenon that reflects the processes that took place in Turgai at the end of the Neolithic period.","PeriodicalId":36692,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86293974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Study of the culture of the Russian population of South of Western Siberia by the staff of the Research Institute of Art Industry in the 1950s–1970s 艺术工业研究所的工作人员在20世纪50年代至70年代对西西伯利亚南部俄罗斯人口的文化进行了研究
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-17
T. Shcheglova, A. V. Rykov
In this paper, the contribution of the staff of the Research Institute of Art Industry to the study of Russian long-term resident population on the territory of the Altai Krai, which up to 1990 included Gorno-Altai Autonomous Region, is presented and analyzed. The analysis is conducted on the basis of studying the collection of the field materials by identifying all expeditions which took place, their routes, participants, and results of the field re-search. The main sources of the research were represented by the archival funds of the institute, which appeared to be fragmentary. The main part of the materials was deposited to the Russian National Museum of Decorative, Applied and Folk Arts. For the subject of this paper, the reports on scientific topics and field trips are of the most interest; an extensive body of visual sources (sketches and photographs) have been used as well, whose superior quality was achieved through participation of professional staff artists and photographers in their production. The population of the Altai Krai (modern Altai Krai and the Altai Republic) were embraced in the field work in the 1950s — 4 expeditions (1951, 1954, 1955, and 1956) and one in 1979. The initial interest was in the culture of the Turkic-speaking population and Turkic traditions of rug weaving and ornamentation. The later expeditions were conducted by two groups — on the study of Turkic and Russian populations. The main objects of the research were architecture, house construction and decoration, weaving, homeware and household appliances and other items which preserved the traces of the long-term residence culture. The revelation for the researchers from the institute was the abundant presence of wooden house carving, both as fragments and as whole complexes. The objects and pieces of art recorded by the researchers are the unique sources which had already disappeared by the 1970s. Part of the collections kept in the Russian National Museum of Decorative, Applied and Folk Arts has primary field materials. These sources were partially published in the works of art historians, but their great eth-nographical potential is not yet exhausted.
本文介绍并分析了艺术工业研究所工作人员对阿尔泰边疆区(截至1990年包括戈尔诺-阿尔泰自治区)境内俄罗斯长期居住人口研究的贡献。分析是在研究实地资料收集的基础上进行的,通过确定所有的考察,他们的路线,参与者和实地研究的结果。研究的主要来源是研究所的档案基金,这似乎是零碎的。这些材料的主要部分被存放在俄罗斯国家装饰、应用和民间艺术博物馆。对于本文的主题,科学主题和实地考察的报告是最令人感兴趣的;还使用了大量的视觉来源(草图和照片),其高质量是通过专业工作人员、艺术家和摄影师参与制作而实现的。阿尔泰边疆区(现在的阿尔泰边疆区和阿尔泰共和国)的人口在20世纪50年代的野外工作中被纳入- 4次探险(1951年,1954年,1955年和1956年)和1979年的一次探险。最初的兴趣是在突厥语人口的文化和突厥传统的地毯编织和装饰。后来的探险是由两个小组进行的——研究突厥人和俄罗斯人。研究的主要对象是建筑、房屋建筑与装饰、编织、家居用品和家用电器等保存了长期居住文化痕迹的物品。该研究所的研究人员发现,大量的木屋雕刻,既有碎片,也有完整的建筑群。研究人员记录的物品和艺术品是20世纪70年代已经消失的独特来源。保存在俄罗斯国家装饰、应用和民间艺术博物馆的部分藏品具有原始的现场材料。这些资料部分发表在艺术史学家的著作中,但它们巨大的民族志潜力尚未耗尽。
{"title":"Study of the culture of the Russian population of South of Western Siberia by the staff of the Research Institute of Art Industry in the 1950s–1970s","authors":"T. Shcheglova, A. V. Rykov","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-17","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the contribution of the staff of the Research Institute of Art Industry to the study of Russian long-term resident population on the territory of the Altai Krai, which up to 1990 included Gorno-Altai Autonomous Region, is presented and analyzed. The analysis is conducted on the basis of studying the collection of the field materials by identifying all expeditions which took place, their routes, participants, and results of the field re-search. The main sources of the research were represented by the archival funds of the institute, which appeared to be fragmentary. The main part of the materials was deposited to the Russian National Museum of Decorative, Applied and Folk Arts. For the subject of this paper, the reports on scientific topics and field trips are of the most interest; an extensive body of visual sources (sketches and photographs) have been used as well, whose superior quality was achieved through participation of professional staff artists and photographers in their production. The population of the Altai Krai (modern Altai Krai and the Altai Republic) were embraced in the field work in the 1950s — 4 expeditions (1951, 1954, 1955, and 1956) and one in 1979. The initial interest was in the culture of the Turkic-speaking population and Turkic traditions of rug weaving and ornamentation. The later expeditions were conducted by two groups — on the study of Turkic and Russian populations. The main objects of the research were architecture, house construction and decoration, weaving, homeware and household appliances and other items which preserved the traces of the long-term residence culture. The revelation for the researchers from the institute was the abundant presence of wooden house carving, both as fragments and as whole complexes. The objects and pieces of art recorded by the researchers are the unique sources which had already disappeared by the 1970s. Part of the collections kept in the Russian National Museum of Decorative, Applied and Folk Arts has primary field materials. These sources were partially published in the works of art historians, but their great eth-nographical potential is not yet exhausted.","PeriodicalId":36692,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75336774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lead bullets of the Russian warrior host of 1582–1585 (based on the materials from the settle-ment of Isker) 1582-1585年俄国战士的铅弹(根据伊斯克定居点的材料)
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-6
А.А. Adamov
The capital of the Siberian Khanate, the Isker hillfort, is located on the right bank of the Irtysh River, 17 km up from the mouth of the Tobol River. A large collection of bullets has been assembled on the monument, which were left by the soldiers who participated in the Yermak's campaign. For the first time, the data on 30 bullets from Isker were reviewed by A.P. Zykov in a joint monograph published in 2017, which included the bullets stored in Tobolsk Museum Reserve. However, some conclusions made by the researcher were not supported by the mu-seum's collections. In total, 23 bullets are stored in the museum, and there are no bullets less than 8 mm in di-ameter, no bullets with a lead funnel, and no cylindrical bullets produced by cutting a lead rod into pieces. In total, our work made use of the data on 139 bullets that are stored in Tobolsk Museum Reserve and bullets that we found during the field research and collection of artefactual remains from the Isker hillfort since 2007. The bullets can be divided into two groups: molded (137 items) and mechanically manufactured (2 items). For the bullets, 12 variants of the traits, which characterize some features of their manufacture, and traces of impact on the projec-tiles before expulsion and those that appeared afterwards, were identified. During the manufacture, the bullet shape was attempted to be made spherical; this was recorded for 37.4 % of the items. Twenty-three percent of the bullets feature a seam from the mold sections, 14.4 % of the bullets preserved areas from lead shrinkage when cooling in the mold, 1.4 % of the bullets preserved a lead funnel, and 27.3 % of the bullets have notches made to increase their lethality. Furthermore, 58.3 % of the bullets bear traces of shooting — striation caused by friction of the projectile against the smooth barrel and traces of deformation caused by hitting a hard surface; only 10.1 % of the bullets are significantly undermolded or cut in halves. Summarizing the data on the bullets from the Isker hillfort, it must be noted that the Russian warrior host of 1582–1585 were armed with Russian-made muskets of small calibers of 8–15 mm. At the same time, the vast majority of them had a caliber of 10–14 mm, of which almost 2/3 were of a 12–13 mm caliber. The warriors campaigning in Siberia did not feel a noticeable shortage of ammunition, conducting annual target practice shooting at hard targets. Ball bullets were used, without lead funnels, which were cast from a precisely meas-ured amount of lead. Notched bullets were quite widely used.
西伯利亚汗国的首都伊斯克山位于额尔齐斯河的右岸,距托博尔河河口17公里。纪念碑上摆放着大量的子弹,这些子弹是参加耶尔马克战役的士兵留下的。ap Zykov在2017年发表的一篇联合专著中首次审查了来自伊斯克的30枚子弹的数据,其中包括储存在托博尔斯克博物馆保护区的子弹。然而,研究人员得出的一些结论并没有得到博物馆藏品的支持。博物馆共保存了23发子弹,没有直径小于8毫米的子弹,没有带铅漏斗的子弹,也没有将铅棒切割成碎片生产的圆柱形子弹。总的来说,我们的工作使用了储存在托博尔斯克博物馆保护区的139颗子弹的数据,以及我们自2007年以来在伊斯克山的实地研究和收集人工遗骸时发现的子弹。子弹可分为两组:模塑(137枚)和机械制造(2枚)。对于子弹,确定了12种特征变体,这些特征表征了其制造的某些特征,以及在发射前和发射后对弹片的影响痕迹。在制造过程中,子弹的形状被试图做成球形;这一比例为37.4%。23%的子弹具有模具部分的接缝,14.4%的子弹在模具冷却时保留了铅收缩的区域,1.4%的子弹保留了铅漏斗,27.3%的子弹有凹槽以增加其杀伤力。此外,58.3%的子弹有射击痕迹——弹丸与光滑的枪管摩擦造成的划痕和击中坚硬表面造成的变形痕迹;只有10.1%的子弹是明显的下模或切成两半。总结Isker山丘上的子弹数据,必须指出的是,1582-1585年的俄罗斯战士主机配备了8-15毫米小口径的俄制火枪。同时,绝大多数武器的口径为10-14毫米,其中近2/3的口径为12-13毫米。在西伯利亚作战的战士们并没有感觉到明显的弹药短缺,他们每年都在进行瞄准硬目标的射击练习。使用的是球形子弹,没有铅漏斗,铅漏斗是由精确测量的铅量铸造而成的。缺口子弹被广泛使用。
{"title":"Lead bullets of the Russian warrior host of 1582–1585 (based on the materials from the settle-ment of Isker)","authors":"А.А. Adamov","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-6","url":null,"abstract":"The capital of the Siberian Khanate, the Isker hillfort, is located on the right bank of the Irtysh River, 17 km up from the mouth of the Tobol River. A large collection of bullets has been assembled on the monument, which were left by the soldiers who participated in the Yermak's campaign. For the first time, the data on 30 bullets from Isker were reviewed by A.P. Zykov in a joint monograph published in 2017, which included the bullets stored in Tobolsk Museum Reserve. However, some conclusions made by the researcher were not supported by the mu-seum's collections. In total, 23 bullets are stored in the museum, and there are no bullets less than 8 mm in di-ameter, no bullets with a lead funnel, and no cylindrical bullets produced by cutting a lead rod into pieces. In total, our work made use of the data on 139 bullets that are stored in Tobolsk Museum Reserve and bullets that we found during the field research and collection of artefactual remains from the Isker hillfort since 2007. The bullets can be divided into two groups: molded (137 items) and mechanically manufactured (2 items). For the bullets, 12 variants of the traits, which characterize some features of their manufacture, and traces of impact on the projec-tiles before expulsion and those that appeared afterwards, were identified. During the manufacture, the bullet shape was attempted to be made spherical; this was recorded for 37.4 % of the items. Twenty-three percent of the bullets feature a seam from the mold sections, 14.4 % of the bullets preserved areas from lead shrinkage when cooling in the mold, 1.4 % of the bullets preserved a lead funnel, and 27.3 % of the bullets have notches made to increase their lethality. Furthermore, 58.3 % of the bullets bear traces of shooting — striation caused by friction of the projectile against the smooth barrel and traces of deformation caused by hitting a hard surface; only 10.1 % of the bullets are significantly undermolded or cut in halves. Summarizing the data on the bullets from the Isker hillfort, it must be noted that the Russian warrior host of 1582–1585 were armed with Russian-made muskets of small calibers of 8–15 mm. At the same time, the vast majority of them had a caliber of 10–14 mm, of which almost 2/3 were of a 12–13 mm caliber. The warriors campaigning in Siberia did not feel a noticeable shortage of ammunition, conducting annual target practice shooting at hard targets. Ball bullets were used, without lead funnels, which were cast from a precisely meas-ured amount of lead. Notched bullets were quite widely used.","PeriodicalId":36692,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"73828572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Natural and geographical peculiarities of the territory of resettlement of Russian peasants in the northern forest-steppe of the Middle Irtysh River region 中额尔齐斯河地区北部森林草原俄罗斯农民安置地区的自然和地理特点
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-14
S. Tikhonov
In this paper, the features of the natural and geographical conditions of the northern forest-steppe of the Middle Irtysh region, which Russian peasants began to develop at the beginning of the 18th century, are exa-mined. The criteria that led the peasants to consider these lands convenient for resettlement have been analyzed. Nowadays, these lands belong to the Gorkovsky and Sargatsky districts of the Omsk Region. The sources for conducting this work were represented by archaeological, ethnographic, and geographical data on this area. The author believes that the natural conditions of the right and left banks differ significantly in the studied area. On the left bank, there is a wide floodplain with a large number of the flooded lakes, small rivers and streams. On the floodplain, there are uplands which become islands during the floods. On the left bank, two lines of villages ap-peared: the first was located on the terrace of the Irtysh River, the second — along the hills on the floodplain. The terrace approaches closely the right bank of the Irtysh; therefore, the cases of coastal collapse and the associated processes of intensive formation of the ravines are frequent there. There is a small amount of water of good qua-lity, while the groundwater runs at a depth of more than 20 m; therefore, cascades of dams were built in the ra-vines. The villages are arranged in two lines, first of which is located directly on the terrace, most often at the mouths of the ravines. The second line of the villages is 8–12 km from the terrace at the tops of the ravines. Here, good quality groundwater is available at a depth of about 3 m. Arable lands, comprising rich black soil, stretch along both banks of the Irtysh. With distance from the Irtysh, more and more lands appear to be less suitable for agriculture. Therefore, these areas were populated later than the banks of the Irtysh. Landslide processes, sti-mulating the active formation of the ravines on the right bank of the Irtysh, were unfavorable in a long term per-spective. Firstly, they occurred with a period of 50 years. Secondly, the coast collapsed at its maximum over about 1 km length. Therefore, the first settlers might have not known about these processes. However, if one takes into account the patterns of the resettlement of the indigenous population, then the absence of archaeologi-cal sites does not necessarily indicate uninhabitedness of the territory, since their settlements could have been destroyed. Although in general, if one to talk about the criteria of the favorableness of land for resettlement, then the presence of not only land, but also arable land and good water must be contemplated.
本文考察了18世纪初俄罗斯农民开始开发的中额尔齐斯河北部森林草原的自然地理条件特征。分析了导致农民考虑这些土地便于安置的标准。如今,这些土地属于鄂木斯克州的戈尔科夫斯基和萨尔加茨基区。开展这项工作的资料来源包括该地区的考古、人种学和地理数据。笔者认为,研究区左右两岸的自然条件差异较大。在左岸,有一个宽阔的洪泛区,有大量的被淹没的湖泊,小河和小溪。在泛滥平原上,有一些高地在洪水期间变成了岛屿。在左岸,出现了两排村庄:第一个位于额尔齐斯河的阶地上,第二个沿着洪泛区的山丘。露台靠近额尔齐斯河的右岸;因此,海岸崩塌和与之相关的沟壑密集形成过程在那里频繁发生。有少量水质较好的水,地下水在20 m以上的深度运行;因此,梯级水坝被建在沙漠中。村庄分为两排,第一排直接位于梯田上,最常位于峡谷口。村庄的第二线距离峡谷顶部的梯田8-12公里。在这里,大约3米深处有优质地下水。额尔齐斯河两岸都是由肥沃的黑土组成的可耕地。随着与额尔齐斯河的距离越来越远,越来越多的土地似乎不适合农业。因此,这些地区的人口比额尔齐斯河沿岸的人口要晚。从长远来看,刺激额尔齐斯河右岸沟壑形成的滑坡过程是不利的。首先,它们发生在50年的时间里。其次,海岸在最大长度约1公里处崩塌。因此,第一批定居者可能不知道这些过程。然而,如果考虑到土著居民重新定居的模式,那么没有考古遗址并不一定表明该领土无人居住,因为他们的定居点可能已被摧毁。虽然一般来说,如果要讨论土地是否适合重新安置的标准,那么不仅要考虑土地的存在,还要考虑可耕地和良好的水源。
{"title":"Natural and geographical peculiarities of the territory of resettlement of Russian peasants in the northern forest-steppe of the Middle Irtysh River region","authors":"S. Tikhonov","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-58-3-14","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the features of the natural and geographical conditions of the northern forest-steppe of the Middle Irtysh region, which Russian peasants began to develop at the beginning of the 18th century, are exa-mined. The criteria that led the peasants to consider these lands convenient for resettlement have been analyzed. Nowadays, these lands belong to the Gorkovsky and Sargatsky districts of the Omsk Region. The sources for conducting this work were represented by archaeological, ethnographic, and geographical data on this area. The author believes that the natural conditions of the right and left banks differ significantly in the studied area. On the left bank, there is a wide floodplain with a large number of the flooded lakes, small rivers and streams. On the floodplain, there are uplands which become islands during the floods. On the left bank, two lines of villages ap-peared: the first was located on the terrace of the Irtysh River, the second — along the hills on the floodplain. The terrace approaches closely the right bank of the Irtysh; therefore, the cases of coastal collapse and the associated processes of intensive formation of the ravines are frequent there. There is a small amount of water of good qua-lity, while the groundwater runs at a depth of more than 20 m; therefore, cascades of dams were built in the ra-vines. The villages are arranged in two lines, first of which is located directly on the terrace, most often at the mouths of the ravines. The second line of the villages is 8–12 km from the terrace at the tops of the ravines. Here, good quality groundwater is available at a depth of about 3 m. Arable lands, comprising rich black soil, stretch along both banks of the Irtysh. With distance from the Irtysh, more and more lands appear to be less suitable for agriculture. Therefore, these areas were populated later than the banks of the Irtysh. Landslide processes, sti-mulating the active formation of the ravines on the right bank of the Irtysh, were unfavorable in a long term per-spective. Firstly, they occurred with a period of 50 years. Secondly, the coast collapsed at its maximum over about 1 km length. Therefore, the first settlers might have not known about these processes. However, if one takes into account the patterns of the resettlement of the indigenous population, then the absence of archaeologi-cal sites does not necessarily indicate uninhabitedness of the territory, since their settlements could have been destroyed. Although in general, if one to talk about the criteria of the favorableness of land for resettlement, then the presence of not only land, but also arable land and good water must be contemplated.","PeriodicalId":36692,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88987249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Historiography of the Neolithic Trans-Urals: the Kozlov and Poludenskaya Cultures 新石器时代跨乌拉尔地区的史学:科兹洛夫和波鲁登斯卡亚文化
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-06-15 DOI: 10.20874/2071-0437-2022-57-2-1
A. Shorin, A. A. Shorina
The paper concerns the analysis of the history of the study of the Kozlov and Poludenskaya Neolithic Cul-tures. The territory of distribution of these archaeological cultures from the end of the 7th to the third quarter of the 5th millennium BC encompassed the forest Trans-Urals and the southern taiga zone of Western Siberia, as well as the adjacent northern edge of the forest-steppe. The source base of the research is represented by a critical analysis of scientific publications touching upon the problems of the Neolithic period in the Trans-Urals, primarily those addressing the functioning of the Kozlov and Poludenskaya Cultures, since the appearance of the first sci-entific concepts to the present day. Three stages in the history of the study of the analyzed cultures have been identified. Although the first artifacts of the Neolithic era are known in the region since as early as the 1830s–1860s, the beginning of the development of first scientific concepts about the Neolithic period of the Trans-Urals (the first stage) is associated with publications of V.N. Chernetsov and O.N. Bader at the turn of the 1860s–1870s. These researchers contemplated the development of the Trans-Ural Neolithic period within the framework of a single East-Urals culture in three successive stages. V.N. Chernetsov introduced the concept of “the Kozlov phase” into scientific discourse as the early stage, followed by the Yuryinsko-Gorbunovskaya and Chestyyag phases. O.N. Bader retained the name of the early stage as the Kozlov stage, but replaced the designation of the other two with the terms “Poludenskaya” and “Sosnovoostrovskaya” stages. A milestone in the historiography of the Neolithic period in the Trans-Urals was the monograph by V.T. Kovaleva published in 1989. Therein is intro-duced a new, fundamentally different from its predecessors, concept of the development of the Neolithic in the region. The researcher abandoned the view of the cultural unity of the Neolithic period in the Trans-Urals and substantiated two lines of development that had emerged already at the early stage — the Koshkino and Kozlov groups of archaeological sites — and which continued in the Late Neolithic as the Boborykino and Poludenskaya Cultures. Since then, the main ideas of V.T. Kovaleva's concept have been developing, or have been fundamen-tally revised on the basis of new sources compiled by the scientists.
本文对科兹洛夫和波鲁登斯卡亚新石器文化研究的历史进行了分析。这些考古文化的分布范围从公元前7世纪末到公元前5千年的第三季度,包括森林的乌拉尔山脉和西伯利亚西部的南部针叶林地带,以及邻近的森林草原的北部边缘。研究的来源基础是对科学出版物的批判性分析,这些出版物涉及跨乌拉尔地区新石器时代的问题,主要是那些解决科兹洛夫和波鲁登斯卡亚文化的功能的出版物,从第一个科学概念出现到今天。在被分析的文化研究的历史上,已经确定了三个阶段。尽管早在19世纪30年代至19世纪60年代,该地区就发现了新石器时代的首批文物,但关于跨乌拉尔地区新石器时代(第一阶段)的第一个科学概念的发展始于19世纪60年代至70年代初V.N. Chernetsov和O.N. Bader的出版物。这些研究人员在单一的东乌拉尔文化的框架内,将跨乌拉尔新石器时代的发展分为三个连续的阶段。切尔涅佐夫(V.N. Chernetsov)将“科兹洛夫阶段”的概念作为早期阶段引入科学话语,随后是yurinsko - gorbunovskaya和Chestyyag阶段。O.N. Bader保留了早期阶段的名称Kozlov阶段,但用术语“Poludenskaya”和“Sosnovoostrovskaya”取代了其他两个阶段的名称。1989年柯瓦列娃(V.T. Kovaleva)出版的专著是跨乌拉尔地区新石器时代史学的里程碑。其中介绍了一个新的,从根本上不同于它的前辈,新石器时代的发展在该地区的概念。研究者放弃了跨乌拉尔地区新石器时代文化统一性的观点,并证实了在早期阶段已经出现的两条发展路线-考古遗址的Koshkino和Kozlov群-并在新石器时代晚期继续作为Boborykino和Poludenskaya文化。从那时起,V.T. Kovaleva的概念的主要思想一直在发展,或者在科学家汇编的新资料的基础上进行了根本性的修改。
{"title":"Historiography of the Neolithic Trans-Urals: the Kozlov and Poludenskaya Cultures","authors":"A. Shorin, A. A. Shorina","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2022-57-2-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-57-2-1","url":null,"abstract":"The paper concerns the analysis of the history of the study of the Kozlov and Poludenskaya Neolithic Cul-tures. The territory of distribution of these archaeological cultures from the end of the 7th to the third quarter of the 5th millennium BC encompassed the forest Trans-Urals and the southern taiga zone of Western Siberia, as well as the adjacent northern edge of the forest-steppe. The source base of the research is represented by a critical analysis of scientific publications touching upon the problems of the Neolithic period in the Trans-Urals, primarily those addressing the functioning of the Kozlov and Poludenskaya Cultures, since the appearance of the first sci-entific concepts to the present day. Three stages in the history of the study of the analyzed cultures have been identified. Although the first artifacts of the Neolithic era are known in the region since as early as the 1830s–1860s, the beginning of the development of first scientific concepts about the Neolithic period of the Trans-Urals (the first stage) is associated with publications of V.N. Chernetsov and O.N. Bader at the turn of the 1860s–1870s. These researchers contemplated the development of the Trans-Ural Neolithic period within the framework of a single East-Urals culture in three successive stages. V.N. Chernetsov introduced the concept of “the Kozlov phase” into scientific discourse as the early stage, followed by the Yuryinsko-Gorbunovskaya and Chestyyag phases. O.N. Bader retained the name of the early stage as the Kozlov stage, but replaced the designation of the other two with the terms “Poludenskaya” and “Sosnovoostrovskaya” stages. A milestone in the historiography of the Neolithic period in the Trans-Urals was the monograph by V.T. Kovaleva published in 1989. Therein is intro-duced a new, fundamentally different from its predecessors, concept of the development of the Neolithic in the region. The researcher abandoned the view of the cultural unity of the Neolithic period in the Trans-Urals and substantiated two lines of development that had emerged already at the early stage — the Koshkino and Kozlov groups of archaeological sites — and which continued in the Late Neolithic as the Boborykino and Poludenskaya Cultures. Since then, the main ideas of V.T. Kovaleva's concept have been developing, or have been fundamen-tally revised on the basis of new sources compiled by the scientists.","PeriodicalId":36692,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75119739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1