首页 > 最新文献

Campbell Systematic Reviews最新文献

英文 中文
Campbell title registrations to date – August 2024, and discontinued protocols 坎贝尔称号迄今为止的注册情况 - 2024 年 8 月,以及中止的协议
IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1439

Details of new titles for systematic reviews or evidence and gap maps that have been accepted by the Editor of a Campbell Coordinating Group are published in each issue of the journal. If you would like to receive a copy of the approved title registration form, please send an email to the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group.

A list of discontinued protocols appears below these new titles. If you are interested to continue a project, please get in touch with the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group or email [email protected].

Intergenerational programs to improve the psychosocial health and wellbeing of older adults in residential aged care: What works, for whom, in what circumstances and how? A rapid realist review

Lysha Lee, Pat Nicholson, Kayla Lock, Katrin Gerber, Alison Hutchinson

23 July 2024

Availability and effectiveness of interventions for the prevention and treatment of obesity in children and adolescents from low- and middle-income countries: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gerardo Gomez, Muhammad Asim, Aliya Ayub, Zulfiqar Bhutta, Saima Afaq

3 August 2024

Effectiveness of school-based nutrition education interventions on obesity and nutritional status of adolescent girls: A systematic review

Sehar Iqbal, Taima Qudah, Abdul Momin Rizwan Ahmad

3 August 2024

Influencing factors and strategies to improve emotional regulation among adolescents: A mixed-method systematic review

Preejana Sharma, Shweta Rai, Linu George

24 June 2024

Interventions and outcomes for depressive symptoms among children and adolescents: An evidence and gap map.

Pengpeng Cao, Yuhao Li, Luyao Yang, Shuo Zhang, Jieyixi Hua, Bingxia Dang, Chuying Li, Bei An, Zheng Xu

24 June 2024

What does the available research tell us about health visitor activities in the United Kingdom and the outcomes for babies and children under five years of age, and their parents or primary caregivers: An evidence and gap map

Michael Fanner, Jane Barlow, Sarah Cowley, Karen Whittaker, Helen Critcher, Mary Malone

24 June 2024

Effects of positive psychological interventions on young children's mental health and well-being: A systematic review

Daniel Hernández-Torrano, Dianne Vella-Brodrick, Laura Ibrayeva, Manat Sergazina, Kelsey Lewis, Anara Burambayeva, Aiida Kulsary

19 June 2024

Bereavement interventions for children and adolescents: An evidence and gap map of primary studies and systematic reviews

Leonor Rodriguez, James Lyons, Amy Maloy, Ailsa O'Brien

10 June 2024

Suicidal behaviours post-natural disasters: An evidence gap map

Mike Trott, Urska Arnautovska, Dan Siskind

1 June 2024

Situational crime prevention measures to prevent terrorist attacks against soft targets and crowded places: An evidence and gap map

Caitlin Clemmow, Zoe Marchment, Pa

坎贝尔协调组编辑已接受的系统综述或证据与差距图的新标题详情将刊登在每期期刊上。如果您希望收到已获批准的标题登记表,请向相关协调组的执行编辑发送电子邮件。如果您有兴趣继续某个项目,请与相关协调小组的主编联系,或发送电子邮件至[email protected]:什么有效、对谁有效、在什么情况下有效、如何有效?快速现实主义综述Lysha Lee, Pat Nicholson, Kayla Lock, Katrin Gerber, Alison Hutchinson2024年7月23日中低收入国家儿童和青少年肥胖症防治干预措施的可用性和有效性:系统综述和荟萃分析协议Gerardo Gomez、Muhammad Asim、Aliya Ayub、Zulfiqar Bhutta、Saima Afaq2024 年 8 月 3 日学校营养教育干预对少女肥胖和营养状况的影响:系统综述Sehar Iqbal, Taima Qudah, Abdul Momin Rizwan Ahmad3 2024 年 8 月影响因素和改善青少年情绪调节的策略:2024 年 6 月 24 日针对儿童和青少年抑郁症状的干预措施和结果:证据和差距图:曹芃芃、李宇昊、杨璐瑶、张硕、华杰怡、党冰霞、李楚颖、安蓓、徐铮2024 年 6 月 24 日现有研究对英国健康访视活动及其对五岁以下婴幼儿及其父母或主要照顾者的影响有何启示?证据和差距图Michael Fanner、Jane Barlow、Sarah Cowley、Karen Whittaker、Helen Critcher、Mary Malone 2024 年 6 月 24 日积极心理干预对幼儿心理健康和幸福感的影响:系统综述Daniel Hernández-Torrano、Dianne Vella-Brodrick、Laura Ibrayeva、Manat Sergazina、Kelsey Lewis、Anara Burambayeva、Aiida Kulsary 2024 年 6 月 19 日针对儿童和青少年的丧亲干预:主要研究和系统综述的证据和差距图Leonor Rodriguez、James Lyons、Amy Maloy、Ailsa O'Brien 2024 年 6 月 10 日自然灾害后的自杀行为:证据差距图Mike Trott、Urska Arnautovska、Dan Siskind2024 年 6 月 1 日预防软目标和拥挤场所恐怖袭击的情景犯罪预防措施:证据和差距图Caitlin Clemmow, Zoe Marchment, Paul Gill2024 年 8 月 22 日经合组织国家为减少恐怖主义而采取的以威慑为导向的反恐干预措施:2024 年 8 月 8 日以英语、法语、西班牙语、葡萄牙语、德语和斯堪的纳维亚语打击网上暴力极端主义宣传的社区倡议和教育计划的有效性和实施情况:系统综述Felipe Pathe Duarte, Cátia Moreira de Carvalho, Pedro Barbosa, Matteo Vergani 2024 年 7 月 18 日激进主义在学龄青少年中的流行程度、风险和保护因素:2024 年 7 月 18 日预防认知和行为激进化的干预措施:系统综述Sara Valdebenito Munoz,Manuel Eisner2024年7月18日针对错误信息、虚假信息和恶意信息的干预措施,以减少和打击暴力极端主义:系统综述Catia de Carvalho、João Pedro Ramos、Pedro Barbosa、Sarah Carthy、Marta Pinto 2024 年 6 月 9 日针对儿童和青少年认知和行为激进化的非刑事司法干预:2024 年 5 月 31 日将健康研究结果传达给研究参与者和其他具有相关生活经验者的工具的比较效果:Elsa-Lynn Nassar, Claire Adams, Danielle Rice, Amanda Wurz, Annabelle South, Jill Boruff, Marie-Eve Carrier, Susan Bartlett, Andrea Benedetti, Katie Gillies、Agnes Kocher、Linda Kwakkenbos、Mwidimi Ndosi、Matthew Sydes、Amy Gietzen、Karen Gottesman、Geneviève Guillot、Amanda Lawrie-Jones、Catarina Leite、John Michalski、Michelle Richard、Maureen Sauve、Brett D.
{"title":"Campbell title registrations to date – August 2024, and discontinued protocols","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1439","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1439","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Details of new titles for systematic reviews or evidence and gap maps that have been accepted by the Editor of a Campbell Coordinating Group are published in each issue of the journal. If you would like to receive a copy of the approved title registration form, please <i>send an email</i> to the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group.</p><p>A list of discontinued protocols appears below these new titles. If you are interested to continue a project, please get in touch with the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group or email <span>[email protected]</span>.</p><p>Intergenerational programs to improve the psychosocial health and wellbeing of older adults in residential aged care: What works, for whom, in what circumstances and how? A rapid realist review</p><p>Lysha Lee, Pat Nicholson, Kayla Lock, Katrin Gerber, Alison Hutchinson</p><p>23 July 2024</p><p>Availability and effectiveness of interventions for the prevention and treatment of obesity in children and adolescents from low- and middle-income countries: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis</p><p>Gerardo Gomez, Muhammad Asim, Aliya Ayub, Zulfiqar Bhutta, Saima Afaq</p><p>3 August 2024</p><p>Effectiveness of school-based nutrition education interventions on obesity and nutritional status of adolescent girls: A systematic review</p><p>Sehar Iqbal, Taima Qudah, Abdul Momin Rizwan Ahmad</p><p>3 August 2024</p><p>Influencing factors and strategies to improve emotional regulation among adolescents: A mixed-method systematic review</p><p>Preejana Sharma, Shweta Rai, Linu George</p><p>24 June 2024</p><p>Interventions and outcomes for depressive symptoms among children and adolescents: An evidence and gap map.</p><p>Pengpeng Cao, Yuhao Li, Luyao Yang, Shuo Zhang, Jieyixi Hua, Bingxia Dang, Chuying Li, Bei An, Zheng Xu</p><p>24 June 2024</p><p>What does the available research tell us about health visitor activities in the United Kingdom and the outcomes for babies and children under five years of age, and their parents or primary caregivers: An evidence and gap map</p><p>Michael Fanner, Jane Barlow, Sarah Cowley, Karen Whittaker, Helen Critcher, Mary Malone</p><p>24 June 2024</p><p>Effects of positive psychological interventions on young children's mental health and well-being: A systematic review</p><p>Daniel Hernández-Torrano, Dianne Vella-Brodrick, Laura Ibrayeva, Manat Sergazina, Kelsey Lewis, Anara Burambayeva, Aiida Kulsary</p><p>19 June 2024</p><p>Bereavement interventions for children and adolescents: An evidence and gap map of primary studies and systematic reviews</p><p>Leonor Rodriguez, James Lyons, Amy Maloy, Ailsa O'Brien</p><p>10 June 2024</p><p>Suicidal behaviours post-natural disasters: An evidence gap map</p><p>Mike Trott, Urska Arnautovska, Dan Siskind</p><p>1 June 2024</p><p>Situational crime prevention measures to prevent terrorist attacks against soft targets and crowded places: An evidence and gap map</p><p>Caitlin Clemmow, Zoe Marchment, Pa","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1439","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142169795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews 搜索研究:坎贝尔系统性综述信息检索指南
IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1433
Heather MacDonald, Cozette Comer, Margaret Foster, Patrick R. Labelle, Scott Marsalis, Kate Nyhan, Zahra Premji, Morwenna Rogers, Ryan Splenda, Claire Stansfield, Sarah Young

This guide outlines general issues in searching for studies; describes the main sources of potential studies; and discusses how to plan the search process, design, and carry out search strategies, manage references found during the search process and document and report the search process.

本指南概述了检索研究的一般问题;介绍了潜在研究的主要来源;讨论了如何规划检索过程、设计和实施检索策略、管理检索过程中发现的参考文献以及记录和报告检索过程。
{"title":"Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews","authors":"Heather MacDonald,&nbsp;Cozette Comer,&nbsp;Margaret Foster,&nbsp;Patrick R. Labelle,&nbsp;Scott Marsalis,&nbsp;Kate Nyhan,&nbsp;Zahra Premji,&nbsp;Morwenna Rogers,&nbsp;Ryan Splenda,&nbsp;Claire Stansfield,&nbsp;Sarah Young","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1433","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This guide outlines general issues in searching for studies; describes the main sources of potential studies; and discusses how to plan the search process, design, and carry out search strategies, manage references found during the search process and document and report the search process.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1433","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142165650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Protocol: Factors contributing to the discontinuation of breastfeeding upon women's return to work: A systematic review protocol 协议:妇女重返工作岗位后停止母乳喂养的因素:系统性审查协议
IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1434
Ana Veronica Scotta, Paula Eugenia Barral, Ailin Farre, Elio Andrés Soria

This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. In order to understand the variables affecting breastfeeding in working women, this systematic review will aim to determine the factors associated with early breastfeeding cessation upon women's return to work within a Social-Ecological framework. This will be achieved by answering the following questions: Which individual factors are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?; Which interpersonal factors are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?; Which community factors are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?; Which institutional factors are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?; Which public policies are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?

这是坎贝尔系统综述的协议。目标如下。为了了解影响职业女性母乳喂养的各种变量,本系统综述将在社会生态学框架内确定与妇女重返工作岗位后提早停止母乳喂养有关的因素。这将通过回答以下问题来实现:哪些个人因素与重返工作岗位后提早停止母乳喂养有关? 哪些人际因素与重返工作岗位后提早停止母乳喂养有关? 哪些社区因素与重返工作岗位后提早停止母乳喂养有关?
{"title":"Protocol: Factors contributing to the discontinuation of breastfeeding upon women's return to work: A systematic review protocol","authors":"Ana Veronica Scotta,&nbsp;Paula Eugenia Barral,&nbsp;Ailin Farre,&nbsp;Elio Andrés Soria","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1434","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1434","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 <p>This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. In order to understand the variables affecting breastfeeding in working women, this systematic review will aim to determine the factors associated with early breastfeeding cessation upon women's return to work within a Social-Ecological framework. This will be achieved by answering the following questions: Which individual factors are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?; Which interpersonal factors are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?; Which community factors are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?; Which institutional factors are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?; Which public policies are associated with early discontinuation of breastfeeding upon returning to work?</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1434","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142165322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review” 更正 "重新审视认知行为疗法对减少刑事司法系统中重新犯罪的有效性:系统回顾"。
IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1438

Smith, A., Roberts, A., Krzemieniewska-Nandwani, K., Eggins, E., Cook, W., Fox, C., Maruna, S., Wallace, S., & Szifris, K. (2024). Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20, e1425. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.142

There is an omission of the word “PROTOCOL” at the beginning of the article title and the correct article title should read as:

PROTOCOL: Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review.

The correct article category is PROTOCOL.

The article title and the category have been corrected in the original publication. We apologize for this error.

[此处更正了文章 DOI:10.1002/cl2.142.]。
{"title":"Correction to “Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1438","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cl2.1438","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Smith, A., Roberts, A., Krzemieniewska-Nandwani, K., Eggins, E., Cook, W., Fox, C., Maruna, S., Wallace, S., &amp; Szifris, K. (2024). Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review. <i>Campbell Systematic Reviews</i>, <i>20</i>, e1425. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.142</p><p>There is an omission of the word “PROTOCOL” at the beginning of the article title and the correct article title should read as:</p><p>PROTOCOL: Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: A systematic review.</p><p>The correct article category is PROTOCOL.</p><p>The article title and the category have been corrected in the original publication. We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366963/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142120800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to “Abortion and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis” 人工流产与心理健康结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析"。
IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1437

Littell, J. H., Young, S., Pigott, T. D., Biggs, M. A., Munk-Olsen, T., & Steinberg, J. R. (2024). Abortion and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20, e1410. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1410

There was an omission of “Protocol” at the beginning of the title for this protocol. The correct title is as follows:

PROTOCOL: Abortion and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

We apologize for this error.

[此处更正了文章 DOI:10.1002/cl2.1410.]。
{"title":"Correction to “Abortion and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1437","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cl2.1437","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Littell, J. H., Young, S., Pigott, T. D., Biggs, M. A., Munk-Olsen, T., &amp; Steinberg, J. R. (2024). Abortion and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. <i>Campbell Systematic Reviews</i>, <i>20</i>, e1410. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1410</p><p>There was an omission of “Protocol” at the beginning of the title for this protocol. The correct title is as follows:</p><p>PROTOCOL: Abortion and mental health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366970/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142120799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychometric properties of instruments for measuring abuse of older people in community and institutional settings: A systematic review 测量社区和机构环境中虐待老年人行为的工具的心理计量特性:系统回顾
IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1419
Fadzilah Hanum Mohd Mydin, Christopher Mikton, Wan Yuen Choo, Ranita Hisham Shunmugam, Aja Murray, Yongjie Yon, Raudah M. Yunus, Noran N. Hairi, Farizah M. Hairi, Marie Beaulieu, Amanda Phelan
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>The examination of psychometric properties in instruments measuring abuse of older people (AOP) is a crucial area of study that has, unfortunately, received relatively little attention. Poor psychometric properties in AOP measurement instruments can significantly contribute to inconsistencies in prevalence estimates, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the magnitude of the problem at national, regional, and global levels.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Objectives</h3> <p>This review rigorously employed the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guideline on the quality of outcome measures. It was designed to identify and review the instruments used to measure AOP, assess the instruments' measurement properties, and identify the definitions of AOP and abuse subtypes measured by these instruments, ensuring the reliability and validity of the findings.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Search Methods</h3> <p>A comprehensive search was conducted up to May 2023 across various online databases, including AgeLine via EBSCOhost, ASSIA via ProQuest, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, EMBASE, LILACS, ProQuest Dissertation & Theses Global, PsycINFO via EBSCOhost, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Sociological Abstract via ProQuest, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Google Scholar and WHO Global Index Medicus. Additionally, relevant studies were identified by thoroughly searching the grey literature from resources such as Campbell Collaboration, OpenAIRE, and GRAFT.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Selection Criteria</h3> <p>All quantitative, qualitative (addressing face and content validity), and mixed-method empirical studies published in peer-reviewed journals or grey literature were included in this review. The included studies were primary studies that (1) evaluated one or more psychometric properties, (2) contained information on instrument development, or (3) examined the content validity of the instruments designed to measure AOP in community or institutional settings. The selected studies describe at least one psychometric property: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Study participants represent the population of interest, including males and females aged 60 or older in community or institutional settings.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3> <p>Two reviewers evaluated the screening of the selected studies' titles, abstracts, and full texts
95 项研究评估了多种形式的虐待,从 2 个到 13 个不同的分量表不等;4 项研究评估了老年人中虐待和忽视的总体情况,14 项研究评估了一种特定类型的虐待。在纳入的研究中,约有四分之一报告了最常用测量工具的心理测量特性:HS-EAST(在 11 项研究中进行了评估)、VASS-12 项目(在 9 项研究中进行了评估)和 CASE(在 9 项研究中进行了评估)。在所有领域(相关性、全面性和可理解性)中,报告工具开发和内容有效性的研究中证据最多的工具是 DEAQ、OAPAM、*RAAL-31 项目、*ICNH(挪威)和 OAFEM。在其他心理测量属性方面,从研究数量来看,证据最多的工具是 HS-EAST(11 项研究,涉及 9 项心理测量属性中的 5 项)、CASE(9 项研究,涉及 9 项心理测量属性中的 6 项)、VASS-12 项目(9 项研究,涉及 9 项心理测量属性中的 5 项)和 GMS(5 项研究,涉及 9 项心理测量属性中的 4 项)。根据总体评分和证据质量,在社区和机构环境中用于患病率测量的 AOP 测量工具的心理测量属性不足,质量较低。 作者的结论 本综述旨在评估社区和机构环境中 AOP 测量工具的总体评级和证据质量。我们的研究结果显示了各种测量工具,其评级和证据质量主要显示为不充分和低质量。总之,AOP 测量工具的心理测量特性尚未得到全面研究,现有工具缺乏足够的证据支持其有效性和可靠性。
{"title":"Psychometric properties of instruments for measuring abuse of older people in community and institutional settings: A systematic review","authors":"Fadzilah Hanum Mohd Mydin,&nbsp;Christopher Mikton,&nbsp;Wan Yuen Choo,&nbsp;Ranita Hisham Shunmugam,&nbsp;Aja Murray,&nbsp;Yongjie Yon,&nbsp;Raudah M. Yunus,&nbsp;Noran N. Hairi,&nbsp;Farizah M. Hairi,&nbsp;Marie Beaulieu,&nbsp;Amanda Phelan","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1419","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1419","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The examination of psychometric properties in instruments measuring abuse of older people (AOP) is a crucial area of study that has, unfortunately, received relatively little attention. Poor psychometric properties in AOP measurement instruments can significantly contribute to inconsistencies in prevalence estimates, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the magnitude of the problem at national, regional, and global levels.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objectives&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This review rigorously employed the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guideline on the quality of outcome measures. It was designed to identify and review the instruments used to measure AOP, assess the instruments' measurement properties, and identify the definitions of AOP and abuse subtypes measured by these instruments, ensuring the reliability and validity of the findings.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Search Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;A comprehensive search was conducted up to May 2023 across various online databases, including AgeLine via EBSCOhost, ASSIA via ProQuest, CINAHL via EBSCOhost, EMBASE, LILACS, ProQuest Dissertation &amp; Theses Global, PsycINFO via EBSCOhost, PubMed, SciELO, Scopus, Sociological Abstract via ProQuest, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Google Scholar and WHO Global Index Medicus. Additionally, relevant studies were identified by thoroughly searching the grey literature from resources such as Campbell Collaboration, OpenAIRE, and GRAFT.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Selection Criteria&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;All quantitative, qualitative (addressing face and content validity), and mixed-method empirical studies published in peer-reviewed journals or grey literature were included in this review. The included studies were primary studies that (1) evaluated one or more psychometric properties, (2) contained information on instrument development, or (3) examined the content validity of the instruments designed to measure AOP in community or institutional settings. The selected studies describe at least one psychometric property: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Study participants represent the population of interest, including males and females aged 60 or older in community or institutional settings.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Data Collection and Analysis&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Two reviewers evaluated the screening of the selected studies' titles, abstracts, and full texts","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1419","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142100329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Interventions promoting resilience through climate smart agricultural practices for women farmers: A systematic review 通过气候智能型农业实践提高女性农民抗灾能力的干预措施:系统回顾
IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1426
Ashrita Saran, Sabina Singh, Neha Gupta, Sujata Chodankar Walke, Ranjana Rao, Christine Simiyu, Suchi Malhotra, Avni Mishra, Ranjitha Puskur, Edoardo Masset, Howard White, Hugh Sharma Waddington
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Climate change poses a significant threat to agricultural production worldwide, with developing countries being particularly vulnerable to its negative impacts. Agriculture, which is a crucial factor in ensuring food security and livelihoods, is particularly vulnerable to changes in climate patterns, such as increased temperatures, drought, and extreme weather events. One approach to addressing these challenges is by promoting the adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices among farmers. CSA combines traditional agricultural practices with innovative techniques and technologies to adapt to and mitigate the impacts of climate change. infrastructure. By adopting CSA practices, farmers can enhance their resilience to climate variability and improve their productivity.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Objectives</h3> <p>This review examines the effectiveness of interventions promoting CSA to enhance farmers' knowledge of the benefits of CSA approaches, subsequent adoption of CSA, and disadoption of harmful agricultural practices in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p> </section> <section> <h3> Search Methods</h3> <p>We searched 39 academic and online databases, websites, and repositories and screened over 19,000 experimental and quasi-experimental publications to identify studies promoting CSA practices to women farmers. We conducted a citation tracking process on included studies and contacted experts to ensure a thorough search.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Selection Criteria</h3> <p>The review focused on studies that included interventions promoting climate-smart agricultural approaches. Using EPPI Reviewer 4, two review authors independently screened the impact evaluation using a standardized screening tool.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3> <p>Information about participant characteristics, intervention characteristics, control conditions, research design, sample size, bias risk, outcomes, and results were gathered. Data collection and quantitative analysis were conducted using standard Campbell Collaboration methods.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Main Results</h3> <p>Eight impact evaluations were found (two randomized controlled trials) evaluating the effects of CSA practices on farmer's knowledge gains of the benefits of CSA practices and subsequent adoption.
背景 气候变化对全世界的农业生产构成重大威胁,发展中国家尤其容易受到气候变化的负面影响。农业是确保粮食安全和生计的关键因素,尤其容易受到气候模式变化的影响,如气温升高、干旱和极端天气事件。应对这些挑战的方法之一是促进农民采用气候智能型农业(CSA)做法。CSA 将传统农业实践与创新技术和工艺相结合,以适应和减轻气候变化的影响。通过采用 CSA 实践,农民可以增强对气候多变性的适应能力,提高生产率。 目标 本综述研究了在中低收入国家(LMICs)推广 CSA 以提高农民对 CSA 方法益处的认识、随后采用 CSA 以及放弃有害农业做法的干预措施的有效性。 检索方法 我们检索了 39 个学术和在线数据库、网站和资料库,筛选了 19,000 多篇实验和准实验出版物,以确定向女性农民推广 CSA 实践的研究。我们对收录的研究进行了引文追踪,并联系了专家,以确保搜索的全面性。 筛选标准 本次综述的重点是包含推广气候智能型农业方法的干预措施的研究。通过 EPPI Reviewer 4,两位综述作者使用标准化筛选工具对影响评估进行了独立筛选。 数据收集与分析 收集了有关参与者特征、干预措施特征、对照条件、研究设计、样本大小、偏差风险、结果和成果的信息。数据收集和定量分析采用标准的坎贝尔合作方法进行。 主要结果 发现了八项影响评估(两项随机对照试验),评估了 CSA 实践对农民了解 CSA 实践的益处以及随后采用 CSA 实践的影响。研究发现,农民田间学校、天气和气候信息服务等知识传播方式对农民了解和采用特定的 CSA 实践产生了积极影响。然而,支持这一说法的证据并不确定,因为在纳入的八项研究中,有五项被评估为偏倚风险较高。不过,我们没有发现信息对放弃过度使用杀虫剂等有害做法有任何影响。 作者的结论 向低收入和中等收入国家的农民推广气候智能型农业方法(CSA)的研究证据基础较小,缺乏报告按性别分列的数据的研究和明确针对女性农民的研究。综述表明,知识传播技术在提高 CSA 知识和采用率方面非常有效,包括病虫害综合防治技术及其益处、采用气候适应性强的水稻种子品种(STRVs)以及农民使用植物杀虫剂。需要开展更多更好的置信度研究,为政策和规划提供信息,包括研究更广泛的干预措施,包括改变规范、价值观和制度安排。
{"title":"Interventions promoting resilience through climate smart agricultural practices for women farmers: A systematic review","authors":"Ashrita Saran,&nbsp;Sabina Singh,&nbsp;Neha Gupta,&nbsp;Sujata Chodankar Walke,&nbsp;Ranjana Rao,&nbsp;Christine Simiyu,&nbsp;Suchi Malhotra,&nbsp;Avni Mishra,&nbsp;Ranjitha Puskur,&nbsp;Edoardo Masset,&nbsp;Howard White,&nbsp;Hugh Sharma Waddington","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1426","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1426","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Climate change poses a significant threat to agricultural production worldwide, with developing countries being particularly vulnerable to its negative impacts. Agriculture, which is a crucial factor in ensuring food security and livelihoods, is particularly vulnerable to changes in climate patterns, such as increased temperatures, drought, and extreme weather events. One approach to addressing these challenges is by promoting the adoption of climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices among farmers. CSA combines traditional agricultural practices with innovative techniques and technologies to adapt to and mitigate the impacts of climate change. infrastructure. By adopting CSA practices, farmers can enhance their resilience to climate variability and improve their productivity.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objectives&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;This review examines the effectiveness of interventions promoting CSA to enhance farmers' knowledge of the benefits of CSA approaches, subsequent adoption of CSA, and disadoption of harmful agricultural practices in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Search Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;We searched 39 academic and online databases, websites, and repositories and screened over 19,000 experimental and quasi-experimental publications to identify studies promoting CSA practices to women farmers. We conducted a citation tracking process on included studies and contacted experts to ensure a thorough search.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Selection Criteria&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The review focused on studies that included interventions promoting climate-smart agricultural approaches. Using EPPI Reviewer 4, two review authors independently screened the impact evaluation using a standardized screening tool.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Data Collection and Analysis&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Information about participant characteristics, intervention characteristics, control conditions, research design, sample size, bias risk, outcomes, and results were gathered. Data collection and quantitative analysis were conducted using standard Campbell Collaboration methods.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Main Results&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Eight impact evaluations were found (two randomized controlled trials) evaluating the effects of CSA practices on farmer's knowledge gains of the benefits of CSA practices and subsequent adoption. ","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1426","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142077829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychosocial, pharmacological, and legal interventions for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children with substance misusing parents: A systematic review 为改善父母滥用药物的儿童的社会心理状况而采取的心理、药物和法律干预措施:系统回顾
IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1413
Elizabeth Eggins, David B. Wilson, Joseph Betts, Sara Roetman, Ned Chandler-Mather, Bronwyn Theroux, Sharon Dawe

Background

Parental substance misuse is a pervasive risk factor for a range of detrimental outcomes for children across the life course. While a variety of interventions have been developed for this population, the existing evidence-base requires consolidation and consideration of the comparative effectiveness of different interventions to facilitate evidence-informed decisions between different intervention approaches.

Objectives

This review aimed to use network meta-analysis to synthesise the comparative effectiveness of psychosocial, legal, and pharmacological interventions for improving outcomes for children with substance misusing parents. Network meta-analysis was not possible; however, we synthesised the effects of a broad range of interventions on child psychosocial outcomes. Another aim was to examine potential moderators of the effects, yet this was also not possible due to data limitations. A secondary objective was to qualitatively synthesise economic, treatment completion, and treatment acceptability information for included studies.

Search Methods

Searches were performed in November 2020 and again in April 2021. Encompassing multiple disciplines, we searched 34 databases, 58 grey literature repositories, and 10 trial registers. Supplementary hand searches were conducted on 11 journals, along with harvesting the references of all included studies and existing reviews, and forward citation searching each report of all included studies. Study authors were contacted to obtain missing data.

Selection Criteria

Eligible studies included randomised and quasi-experimental evaluations of psychosocial, pharmacological, and/or legal interventions using either a placebo, no treatment, waitlist control, treatment-as-usual, or alternative treatment as a comparison condition. Study participants needed to be comprised of families with children under the age of 18 with one or more currently substance-misusing parents (or caregivers). Studies were required to evaluate the eligible intervention using a child-focused psychosocial outcome. If reported in eligible studies, the following secondary outcomes were also synthesised in the review: cost-effectiveness, treatment completion, length of time in treatment and acceptability of treatment (e.g., participant perspectives of the intervention). There were no restrictions placed on publication status or geographic location, however only research written in English was

只有 5 项基于 3 项研究的单一效应估计值显示了负面影响,包括:接受干预的儿童相对于接受常规治疗或未接受治疗的儿童而言,抑郁症状和躯体化症状(家长报告)、绝望情绪(儿童报告)、教育成就困难(家长报告)和经证实的儿童保护报告均较高。九项荟萃分析和 36 项单一研究的效果估计表明,社会心理、药物和/或法律干预措施对一系列特定的儿童福利、发育和情绪/行为结果具有积极影响。不同领域和不同研究的偏倚风险各不相同,这进一步降低了研究结果的可信度。根据所纳入研究的子集,治疗完成情况往往各不相同,但对父母滥用药物的儿童进行干预可以实现成本效益。 作者的结论 尽管有大量的评估证据,但由于结果不一、数据缺失等原因,无法通过分析来正式研究心理、法律和药物干预对改善父母滥用药物的儿童的治疗效果的比较效果。大量未报告(缺失)的数据意味着,由于研究单一且样本量较小,许多效果估计值的可信度不足。综述结果表明,针对受父母药物滥用影响的家庭的干预措施,如果能全面解决多个领域的问题,如父母的福祉/心理健康、养育子女、子女的福祉和/或影响家庭福祉的其他因素(如住房),则可能有效。
{"title":"Psychosocial, pharmacological, and legal interventions for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children with substance misusing parents: A systematic review","authors":"Elizabeth Eggins,&nbsp;David B. Wilson,&nbsp;Joseph Betts,&nbsp;Sara Roetman,&nbsp;Ned Chandler-Mather,&nbsp;Bronwyn Theroux,&nbsp;Sharon Dawe","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1413","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1413","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Parental substance misuse is a pervasive risk factor for a range of detrimental outcomes for children across the life course. While a variety of interventions have been developed for this population, the existing evidence-base requires consolidation and consideration of the comparative effectiveness of different interventions to facilitate evidence-informed decisions between different intervention approaches.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This review aimed to use network meta-analysis to synthesise the comparative effectiveness of psychosocial, legal, and pharmacological interventions for improving outcomes for children with substance misusing parents. Network meta-analysis was not possible; however, we synthesised the effects of a broad range of interventions on child psychosocial outcomes. Another aim was to examine potential moderators of the effects, yet this was also not possible due to data limitations. A secondary objective was to qualitatively synthesise economic, treatment completion, and treatment acceptability information for included studies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Searches were performed in November 2020 and again in April 2021. Encompassing multiple disciplines, we searched 34 databases, 58 grey literature repositories, and 10 trial registers. Supplementary hand searches were conducted on 11 journals, along with harvesting the references of all included studies and existing reviews, and forward citation searching each report of all included studies. Study authors were contacted to obtain missing data.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Eligible studies included randomised and quasi-experimental evaluations of psychosocial, pharmacological, and/or legal interventions using either a placebo, no treatment, waitlist control, treatment-as-usual, or alternative treatment as a comparison condition. Study participants needed to be comprised of families with children under the age of 18 with one or more currently substance-misusing parents (or caregivers). Studies were required to evaluate the eligible intervention using a child-focused psychosocial outcome. If reported in eligible studies, the following secondary outcomes were also synthesised in the review: cost-effectiveness, treatment completion, length of time in treatment and acceptability of treatment (e.g., participant perspectives of the intervention). There were no restrictions placed on publication status or geographic location, however only research written in English was ","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1413","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142013608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: A systematic assessment of current methods 坎贝尔协作组织系统综述的搜索和报告:对当前方法的系统评估。
IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1432
Sarah Young, Heather MacDonald, Diana Louden, Ursula M. Ellis, Zahra Premji, Morwenna Rogers, Alison Bethel, David Pickup
<p>The search methods used in systematic reviews provide the foundation for establishing the body of literature from which conclusions are drawn and recommendations made. Searches should aim to be comprehensive and reporting of search methods should be transparent and reproducible. Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews strive to adhere to the best methodological guidance available for this type of searching. The current work aims to provide an assessment of the conduct and reporting of searches in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews. Our objectives were to examine how searches are currently conducted in Campbell systematic reviews, how search strategies, search methods and search reporting adhere to the Methodological Expectations of Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR) and PRISMA standards, and identify emerging or novel methods used in searching in Campbell systematic reviews. We also investigated the role of information specialists in Campbell systematic reviews. We handsearched the <i>Campbell Systematic Reviews</i> journal tables of contents from January 2017 to March 2024. We included all systematic reviews published since 2017. We excluded other types of evidence synthesis (e.g., evidence and gap maps), updates to systematic reviews when search methods were not changed from the original pre-2017 review, and systematic reviews that did not conduct their own original searches. We developed a data extraction form in part based on the conduct and reporting items in MECCIR and PRISMA. In addition, we extracted information about the general quality of searches based on the use of Boolean operators, keywords, database syntax and subject headings. Data extraction included information about reporting of sources searched, some aspects of search quality, the use and reporting of supplementary search methods, reporting of the search strategy, the involvement of information specialists, date of the most recent search, and citation of the Campbell search methods guidance. Items were rated as fully, partially or not conducted or reported. We cross-walked our data extraction items to the 2019 MECCIR standards and 2020 PRISMA guidelines and provide descriptive analyses of the conduct and reporting of searches in Campbell systematic reviews, indicating level of adherence to standards where applicable. We included 111 Campbell systematic reviews across all coordinating groups published since 2017 up to the search date. Almost all (98%) included reviews searched at least two relevant databases and all reported the databases searched. All reviews searched grey literature and most (82%) provided a full list of grey literature sources. Detailed information about databases such as platform and date range coverage was lacking in 16% and 77% of the reviews, respectively. In terms of search strategies, most used Boolean operators, search syntax and phrase searching correctly, but subject headings in databases with controlled vocabulary were
系统性综述中使用的检索方法为建立文献库、从中得出结论和提出建议奠定了基础。检索应力求全面,检索方法的报告应透明且可重复。坎贝尔协作组织的系统性综述努力遵守此类检索的最佳方法指导。目前的工作旨在对坎贝尔协作系统综述的检索行为和报告进行评估。我们的目标是研究坎贝尔系统性综述目前是如何进行检索的,检索策略、检索方法和检索报告是如何遵守《坎贝尔合作干预综述方法学期望》(MECCIR)和 PRISMA 标准的,并确定坎贝尔系统性综述检索中使用的新兴或新型方法。我们还调查了信息专家在坎贝尔系统综述中的作用。我们手工检索了 2017 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月的坎贝尔系统综述期刊目录。我们纳入了自 2017 年以来发表的所有系统综述。我们排除了其他类型的证据综合(如证据和差距图)、检索方法与 2017 年之前的原始综述相比没有变化的系统综述更新,以及没有进行自己的原始检索的系统综述。我们根据 MECCIR 和 PRISMA 中的行为和报告项目开发了数据提取表。此外,我们还根据布尔运算符、关键词、数据库语法和主题词的使用情况,提取了有关检索总体质量的信息。数据提取包括以下方面的信息:检索来源的报告、检索质量的某些方面、补充检索方法的使用和报告、检索策略的报告、信息专家的参与、最近一次检索的日期以及坎贝尔检索方法指南的引用。项目被评为完全、部分或未进行或未报告。我们将数据提取项目与 2019 年 MECCIR 标准和 2020 年 PRISMA 指南进行了交叉比对,并对坎贝尔系统性综述中检索的进行和报告情况进行了描述性分析,同时在适用的情况下说明了遵守标准的程度。我们纳入了自 2017 年起至检索日止发表的 111 篇坎贝尔系统性综述,涉及所有协调组。几乎所有(98%)纳入的综述都检索了至少两个相关数据库,并且所有综述都报告了检索的数据库。所有综述都检索了灰色文献,大多数(82%)提供了灰色文献来源的完整清单。分别有 16% 和 77% 的综述缺乏数据库的详细信息,如平台和日期范围。在检索策略方面,大多数综述都正确使用了布尔运算符、检索语法和短语检索,但只有大约一半的综述使用了数据库中的主题词表和控制词汇。大多数综述报告了至少一种完整的数据库检索策略(90%),其中 63% 提供了所有数据库的完整检索策略。大多数综述都进行了一些补充检索,最常见的是检索纳入研究的参考文献,而手工检索期刊和前向引文检索的报告较少(分别为 51% 和 62%)。29% 的综述有信息专家作为合著者,约 45% 的综述没有提及任何信息专家的参与。当信息专家是合著者时,许多报告和行为标准及指南的遵守率也随之提高,包括报告网站 URL、报告前向引文检索方法、正确使用数据库语法和使用主题词。在遵守行为和报告标准方面没有发现纵向趋势,2017年发布的坎贝尔检索方法指南仅在12篇综述中被引用。我们还发现,最近一次检索与发表日期之间的中位时滞为 20 个月。总体而言,收录的坎贝尔系统性综述检索了范围广泛的书目数据库和灰色文献,并至少进行了一些补充检索,如检索收录研究的参考文献或联系专家。强制性标准的报告不尽相同,有些标准经常未报告(如网站 URL 和数据库日期范围),而其他标准在大多数综述中都有详细报告。例如,大多数综述都详细报告了数据库检索策略。对于灰色文献,来源名称的报告较多,但搜索策略的报告较少。研究结果将用于确定通过更新指南、同行评审流程以及作者培训和支持来推进坎贝尔综述当前做法的机会。
{"title":"Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: A systematic assessment of current methods","authors":"Sarah Young,&nbsp;Heather MacDonald,&nbsp;Diana Louden,&nbsp;Ursula M. Ellis,&nbsp;Zahra Premji,&nbsp;Morwenna Rogers,&nbsp;Alison Bethel,&nbsp;David Pickup","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1432","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cl2.1432","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The search methods used in systematic reviews provide the foundation for establishing the body of literature from which conclusions are drawn and recommendations made. Searches should aim to be comprehensive and reporting of search methods should be transparent and reproducible. Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews strive to adhere to the best methodological guidance available for this type of searching. The current work aims to provide an assessment of the conduct and reporting of searches in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews. Our objectives were to examine how searches are currently conducted in Campbell systematic reviews, how search strategies, search methods and search reporting adhere to the Methodological Expectations of Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR) and PRISMA standards, and identify emerging or novel methods used in searching in Campbell systematic reviews. We also investigated the role of information specialists in Campbell systematic reviews. We handsearched the &lt;i&gt;Campbell Systematic Reviews&lt;/i&gt; journal tables of contents from January 2017 to March 2024. We included all systematic reviews published since 2017. We excluded other types of evidence synthesis (e.g., evidence and gap maps), updates to systematic reviews when search methods were not changed from the original pre-2017 review, and systematic reviews that did not conduct their own original searches. We developed a data extraction form in part based on the conduct and reporting items in MECCIR and PRISMA. In addition, we extracted information about the general quality of searches based on the use of Boolean operators, keywords, database syntax and subject headings. Data extraction included information about reporting of sources searched, some aspects of search quality, the use and reporting of supplementary search methods, reporting of the search strategy, the involvement of information specialists, date of the most recent search, and citation of the Campbell search methods guidance. Items were rated as fully, partially or not conducted or reported. We cross-walked our data extraction items to the 2019 MECCIR standards and 2020 PRISMA guidelines and provide descriptive analyses of the conduct and reporting of searches in Campbell systematic reviews, indicating level of adherence to standards where applicable. We included 111 Campbell systematic reviews across all coordinating groups published since 2017 up to the search date. Almost all (98%) included reviews searched at least two relevant databases and all reported the databases searched. All reviews searched grey literature and most (82%) provided a full list of grey literature sources. Detailed information about databases such as platform and date range coverage was lacking in 16% and 77% of the reviews, respectively. In terms of search strategies, most used Boolean operators, search syntax and phrase searching correctly, but subject headings in databases with controlled vocabulary were","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11339316/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142037283","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What is the effect of intergenerational activities on the wellbeing and mental health of children and young people?: A systematic review 代际活动对儿童和青少年的福祉和心理健康有何影响?系统回顾
IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Pub Date : 2024-08-18 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1429
Fiona Campbell, Rebecca Whear, Morwenna Rogers, Anthea Sutton, Jane Barlow, Andrew Booth, Andrew Tattersall, Louise Wolstenholme, Joanna Thompson-Coon

Background

Societal changes have led to greater isolation and higher levels of loneliness particularly for older generations. Loneliness is a significant public health challenge leading to increased levels of poor mental health. Depression and anxiety are also increasing in prevalence amongst children and young people. Intergenerational activities are interventions designed to bring together older and younger generations with the purpose of allowing participants to utilise their experiences and skills, and to give participants a chance to experience the pleasure and excitement that occurs with the transmission of knowledge and skills from one generation to another. Intergenerational activities are therefore potential interventions that can address the growing problems associated with loneliness and lack of wellbeing.

Objectives

This systematic review aims to examine the impact of intergenerational interventions on the wellbeing and mental health in children and adolescents, and potential harmful effects. It also aims to identify areas for future research as well as key messages for service commissioners.

Search Methods

We searched an evidence and gap map published in 2022 (comprehensive searches conducted July 2021 and updated June 2023) to identify randomised controlled trials of intergenerational interventions that report mental health and wellbeing outcomes for children and young people.

Selection Criteria

Randomised controlled trials of intergenerational interventions that involved unrelated younger and older people with at least one skipped generation between them and reported mental health or wellbeing outcomes for children and young people were included in this review.

Data Collection and Analysis

We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Campbell Collaboration. We conducted data extraction and Cochrane risk of bias assessments in EPPI reviewer.

Main Results

While we identified 500 evaluations of intergenerational interventions, where the impact on participating children and/or young people was evaluated this was most often limited to assessing their impact on attitudes to aging. We identified five studies eva

背景 社会变革导致人们更加孤独,尤其是老一代人的孤独感更强。孤独是一项重大的公共卫生挑战,会导致心理健康水平下降。抑郁症和焦虑症在儿童和青少年中的发病率也在上升。代际活动是一种干预措施,旨在将老一代人和年轻一代人聚集在一起,让参与者利用他们的经验和技能,并让参与者有机会体验知识和技能代代相传所带来的快乐和兴奋。因此,代际活动是一种潜在的干预措施,可以解决与孤独和缺乏幸福感相关的日益严重的问题。 目标 本系统综述旨在研究代际干预对儿童和青少年福祉和心理健康的影响,以及潜在的有害影响。它还旨在确定未来研究的领域以及为服务委托人提供的关键信息。 检索方法 我们检索了 2022 年发布的证据和差距图(2021 年 7 月进行了全面检索,2023 年 6 月进行了更新),以确定报告儿童和青少年心理健康和幸福结果的代际干预随机对照试验。 选择标准 本综述纳入了有关代际干预的随机对照试验,这些试验涉及无亲属关系的年轻人和老年人,他们之间至少隔了一代人,并报告了儿童和青少年的心理健康或幸福结果。 数据收集与分析 我们采用了坎贝尔协作组织所要求的标准方法程序。我们在 EPPI 评审员中进行了数据提取和 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估。 主要结果 虽然我们发现了 500 项关于代际干预的评估,但在评估对参与儿童和/或年轻人的影响时,大多仅限于评估其对老龄化态度的影响。我们发现有五项研究对五种不同类型的代际干预措施进行了评估,其中包括一次性课程和持续一年的课程,以衡量其对儿童和/或青少年心理健康和福祉的影响。干预的目的各不相同,包括促进社交技能、预防有害行为和促进学习。五项研究中儿童的年龄也各不相同,其中一项研究的对象是年龄较小的儿童,两项研究的对象是年龄较小的青少年,两项研究的对象是年龄较大的青少年。有一项研究的对象是社会经济条件较差的儿童,而其他研究则未说明儿童和青少年的社会经济背景。用于评估干预措施的结果测量方法各不相同,没有一项研究测量相同的结果。有一项研究显示,干预措施改善了儿童的幸福指数,这是一项针对贫困社区儿童的干预措施,干预持续时间为一年,使年龄较小的参与者和年龄较大的参与者之间建立了更深层次的关系。四项研究没有发现.......。所纳入的研究存在较高的偏倚风险,因此研究结果的可靠性存在不确定性。支持干预措施发展和解释效果机制的基础理论描述不充分。 作者的结论 有关代际干预对儿童和青少年心理健康和幸福的有效性的证据很有限,而且没有定论。很少有评估试图衡量代际干预对儿童和青少年的影响,而在衡量这种影响时,重点通常仅限于对老龄化的态度。已收集到的证据过于分散,无法对评估结果进行综合。支持其发展的基础理论描述不清,也没有后续数据来确定其效益是否得以保持。代际干预措施显示了前景,但研究人员未能衡量这些措施对儿童和青年的心理健康和福祉的影响。
{"title":"What is the effect of intergenerational activities on the wellbeing and mental health of children and young people?: A systematic review","authors":"Fiona Campbell,&nbsp;Rebecca Whear,&nbsp;Morwenna Rogers,&nbsp;Anthea Sutton,&nbsp;Jane Barlow,&nbsp;Andrew Booth,&nbsp;Andrew Tattersall,&nbsp;Louise Wolstenholme,&nbsp;Joanna Thompson-Coon","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1429","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1429","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Societal changes have led to greater isolation and higher levels of loneliness particularly for older generations. Loneliness is a significant public health challenge leading to increased levels of poor mental health. Depression and anxiety are also increasing in prevalence amongst children and young people. Intergenerational activities are interventions designed to bring together older and younger generations with the purpose of allowing participants to utilise their experiences and skills, and to give participants a chance to experience the pleasure and excitement that occurs with the transmission of knowledge and skills from one generation to another. Intergenerational activities are therefore potential interventions that can address the growing problems associated with loneliness and lack of wellbeing.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This systematic review aims to examine the impact of intergenerational interventions on the wellbeing and mental health in children and adolescents, and potential harmful effects. It also aims to identify areas for future research as well as key messages for service commissioners.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched an evidence and gap map published in 2022 (comprehensive searches conducted July 2021 and updated June 2023) to identify randomised controlled trials of intergenerational interventions that report mental health and wellbeing outcomes for children and young people.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Randomised controlled trials of intergenerational interventions that involved unrelated younger and older people with at least one skipped generation between them and reported mental health or wellbeing outcomes for children and young people were included in this review.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Campbell Collaboration. We conducted data extraction and Cochrane risk of bias assessments in EPPI reviewer.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Main Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>While we identified 500 evaluations of intergenerational interventions, where the impact on participating children and/or young people was evaluated this was most often limited to assessing their impact on attitudes to aging. We identified five studies eva","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1429","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142002532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1