<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Evidence and Gap Maps (EGMs) should be regularly updated. Running update searches to find new studies for EGMs can be a time-consuming process. Search Summary Tables (SSTs) can help streamline searches by identifying which resources were most lucrative for identifying relevant articles, and which were redundant. The aim of this study was to use an SST to streamline search methods for an EGM of studies about intergenerational activities.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Methods</h3> <p>To produce the EGM, 15 databases were searched. 8638 records were screened and 500 studies were included in the final EGM. Using an SST, we determined which databases and search methods were the most efficient in terms of sensitivity and specificity for finding the included studies. We also investigated whether any database performed particularly well for returning particular study types. For the best performing databases we analysed the search terms used to streamline the strategies.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Results</h3> <p>No single database returned all of the studies included in the EGM. Out of 500 studies PsycINFO returned 40% (<i>n</i> = 202), CINAHL 39% (<i>n</i> = 194), Ageline 25% (<i>n</i> = 174), MEDLINE 23% (<i>n</i> = 117), ERIC 20% (<i>n</i> = 100) and Embase 19% (<i>n</i> = 98). HMIC database and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science via Web of Science returned no studies that were included in the EGM. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) returned the highest number of unique studies (<i>n</i> = 42), followed by ERIC (<i>n</i> = 33) and Ageline (<i>n</i> = 29). Ageline returned the most randomised controlled trials (42%) followed by CINAHL (34%), MEDLINE (29%) and CENTRAL (29%). CINAHL, Ageline, MEDLINE and PsycINFO performed the best for locating systematic reviews. (62%, 46% and 42% respectively). CINAHL, PsycINFO and Ageline performed best for qualitative studies (41%, 40% and 34%). The Journal of Intergenerational Relationships returned more included studies than any other journal (16%). No combinations of search terms were found to be better in terms of balancing specificity and sensitivity than the original search strategies. However, strategies could be reduced considerably in terms of length without losing key, unique studies.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Conclusion</h3> <p>Using SSTs we have developed a method for streamlining update searches for an EGM about intergenerational activities. For future updates we recommend that MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, Ageline, CINAHL and PQDT are searched.
{"title":"Streamlining search methods to update evidence and gap maps: A case study using intergenerational interventions","authors":"Morwenna Rogers, Anthea Sutton, Fiona Campbell, Rebecca Whear, Alison Bethel, Jo Thompson Coon","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1380","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1380","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Evidence and Gap Maps (EGMs) should be regularly updated. Running update searches to find new studies for EGMs can be a time-consuming process. Search Summary Tables (SSTs) can help streamline searches by identifying which resources were most lucrative for identifying relevant articles, and which were redundant. The aim of this study was to use an SST to streamline search methods for an EGM of studies about intergenerational activities.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To produce the EGM, 15 databases were searched. 8638 records were screened and 500 studies were included in the final EGM. Using an SST, we determined which databases and search methods were the most efficient in terms of sensitivity and specificity for finding the included studies. We also investigated whether any database performed particularly well for returning particular study types. For the best performing databases we analysed the search terms used to streamline the strategies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>No single database returned all of the studies included in the EGM. Out of 500 studies PsycINFO returned 40% (<i>n</i> = 202), CINAHL 39% (<i>n</i> = 194), Ageline 25% (<i>n</i> = 174), MEDLINE 23% (<i>n</i> = 117), ERIC 20% (<i>n</i> = 100) and Embase 19% (<i>n</i> = 98). HMIC database and Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science via Web of Science returned no studies that were included in the EGM. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses (PQDT) returned the highest number of unique studies (<i>n</i> = 42), followed by ERIC (<i>n</i> = 33) and Ageline (<i>n</i> = 29). Ageline returned the most randomised controlled trials (42%) followed by CINAHL (34%), MEDLINE (29%) and CENTRAL (29%). CINAHL, Ageline, MEDLINE and PsycINFO performed the best for locating systematic reviews. (62%, 46% and 42% respectively). CINAHL, PsycINFO and Ageline performed best for qualitative studies (41%, 40% and 34%). The Journal of Intergenerational Relationships returned more included studies than any other journal (16%). No combinations of search terms were found to be better in terms of balancing specificity and sensitivity than the original search strategies. However, strategies could be reduced considerably in terms of length without losing key, unique studies.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Using SSTs we have developed a method for streamlining update searches for an EGM about intergenerational activities. For future updates we recommend that MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, Ageline, CINAHL and PQDT are searched. ","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1380","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139111944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Louise Mansfield, Norma Daykin, Neil E. O'Connell, Daniel Bailey, Louise Forde, Robyn Smith, Jake Gifford, Garcia Ashdown-Franks
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Young people who enter the justice system experience complex health and social needs, and offending behaviour is increasingly recognised as a public health problem. Arts interventions can be used with the aim of preventing or reducing offending or reoffending.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Objectives</h3> <p>1. To evaluate evidence on the effectiveness and impact of arts interventions on keeping children and young people safe from involvement in violence and crime. 2. To explore factors impacting the implementation of arts interventions, and barriers and facilitators to participation and achievement of intended outcomes. 3. To develop a logic model of the processes by which arts interventions might work in preventing offending behaviours.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Search Methods</h3> <p>We searched AMED, Academic Search Complete; APA PsycInfo; CINAHL Plus; ERIC; SocIndex; SportDiscus, Medline, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, PTSDPubs and Performing Arts Periodicals Database, Sage, the US National Criminal Justice Reference Service, the Global Policing and British Library EThOS databases, and the National Police Library from inception to January 2023 without language restrictions.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Selection Criteria</h3> <p>We included randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental study designs. We included qualitative studies conducted alongside intervention trials investigating experiences and perceptions of participants, and offering insight into the barriers and facilitators to delivering and receiving arts interventions. We included qualitative and mixed methods studies focused on delivery of arts interventions. We included studies from any global setting. We included studies with CYP (8–25 years) who were identified as at-risk of offending behaviour (secondary populations) or already in the criminal justice system (tertiary populations). We included studies of interventions involving arts participation as an intervention on its own or alongside other interventions. Primary outcomes were: (i) offending behaviour and (ii) anti-pro-social behaviours. Secondary outcomes were: participation/attendance at arts interventions, educational attainment, school attendance and engagement and exclusions, workplace engagement, wellbeing, costs and associated economic outcomes and adverse events.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3> <p>We included 43
{"title":"A mixed methods systematic review on the effects of arts interventions for children and young people at-risk of offending, or who have offended on behavioural, psychosocial, cognitive and offending outcomes: A systematic review","authors":"Louise Mansfield, Norma Daykin, Neil E. O'Connell, Daniel Bailey, Louise Forde, Robyn Smith, Jake Gifford, Garcia Ashdown-Franks","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1377","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1377","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Young people who enter the justice system experience complex health and social needs, and offending behaviour is increasingly recognised as a public health problem. Arts interventions can be used with the aim of preventing or reducing offending or reoffending.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>1. To evaluate evidence on the effectiveness and impact of arts interventions on keeping children and young people safe from involvement in violence and crime. 2. To explore factors impacting the implementation of arts interventions, and barriers and facilitators to participation and achievement of intended outcomes. 3. To develop a logic model of the processes by which arts interventions might work in preventing offending behaviours.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched AMED, Academic Search Complete; APA PsycInfo; CINAHL Plus; ERIC; SocIndex; SportDiscus, Medline, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, PTSDPubs and Performing Arts Periodicals Database, Sage, the US National Criminal Justice Reference Service, the Global Policing and British Library EThOS databases, and the National Police Library from inception to January 2023 without language restrictions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We included randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental study designs. We included qualitative studies conducted alongside intervention trials investigating experiences and perceptions of participants, and offering insight into the barriers and facilitators to delivering and receiving arts interventions. We included qualitative and mixed methods studies focused on delivery of arts interventions. We included studies from any global setting. We included studies with CYP (8–25 years) who were identified as at-risk of offending behaviour (secondary populations) or already in the criminal justice system (tertiary populations). We included studies of interventions involving arts participation as an intervention on its own or alongside other interventions. Primary outcomes were: (i) offending behaviour and (ii) anti-pro-social behaviours. Secondary outcomes were: participation/attendance at arts interventions, educational attainment, school attendance and engagement and exclusions, workplace engagement, wellbeing, costs and associated economic outcomes and adverse events.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We included 43 ","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1377","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139109856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Road Traffic injuries (RTI) are among the top ten leading causes of death in the world resulting in 1.35 million deaths every year, about 93% of which occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite several global resolutions to reduce traffic injuries, they have continued to grow in many countries. Many high-income countries have successfully reduced RTI by using a public health approach and implementing evidence-based interventions. As many LMICs develop their highway infrastructure, adopting a similar scientific approach towards road safety is crucial. The evidence also needs to be evaluated to assess external validity because measures that have worked in high-income countries may not translate equally well to other contexts. An evidence gap map for RTI is the first step towards understanding what evidence is available, from where, and the key gaps in knowledge.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Objectives</h3> <p>The objective of this evidence gap map (EGM) is to identify existing evidence from all effectiveness studies and systematic reviews related to road safety interventions. In addition, the EGM identifies gaps in evidence where new primary studies and systematic reviews could add value. This will help direct future research and discussions based on systematic evidence towards the approaches and interventions which are most effective in the road safety sector. This could enable the generation of evidence for informing policy at global, regional or national levels.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Search Methods</h3> <p>The EGM includes systematic reviews and impact evaluations assessing the effect of interventions for RTI reported in academic databases, organization websites, and grey literature sources. The studies were searched up to December 2019.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Selection Criteria</h3> <p>The interventions were divided into five broad categories: (a) human factors (e.g., enforcement or road user education), (b) road design, infrastructure and traffic control, (c) legal and institutional framework, (d) post-crash pre-hospital care, and (e) vehicle factors (except car design for occupant protection) and protective devices. Included studies reported two primary outcomes: fatal crashes and non-fatal injury crashes; and four intermediate outcomes: change in use of seat belts, change in use of helmets, change in speed, and change in alcohol/drug use. Studies were excluded if they did not report injury or fatality as one of the outcomes.</p> </section>
{"title":"Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map","authors":"Rahul Goel, Geetam Tiwari, Mathew Varghese, Kavi Bhalla, Girish Agrawal, Guneet Saini, Abhaya Jha, Denny John, Ashrita Saran, Howard White, Dinesh Mohan","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1367","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Road Traffic injuries (RTI) are among the top ten leading causes of death in the world resulting in 1.35 million deaths every year, about 93% of which occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite several global resolutions to reduce traffic injuries, they have continued to grow in many countries. Many high-income countries have successfully reduced RTI by using a public health approach and implementing evidence-based interventions. As many LMICs develop their highway infrastructure, adopting a similar scientific approach towards road safety is crucial. The evidence also needs to be evaluated to assess external validity because measures that have worked in high-income countries may not translate equally well to other contexts. An evidence gap map for RTI is the first step towards understanding what evidence is available, from where, and the key gaps in knowledge.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The objective of this evidence gap map (EGM) is to identify existing evidence from all effectiveness studies and systematic reviews related to road safety interventions. In addition, the EGM identifies gaps in evidence where new primary studies and systematic reviews could add value. This will help direct future research and discussions based on systematic evidence towards the approaches and interventions which are most effective in the road safety sector. This could enable the generation of evidence for informing policy at global, regional or national levels.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The EGM includes systematic reviews and impact evaluations assessing the effect of interventions for RTI reported in academic databases, organization websites, and grey literature sources. The studies were searched up to December 2019.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The interventions were divided into five broad categories: (a) human factors (e.g., enforcement or road user education), (b) road design, infrastructure and traffic control, (c) legal and institutional framework, (d) post-crash pre-hospital care, and (e) vehicle factors (except car design for occupant protection) and protective devices. Included studies reported two primary outcomes: fatal crashes and non-fatal injury crashes; and four intermediate outcomes: change in use of seat belts, change in use of helmets, change in speed, and change in alcohol/drug use. Studies were excluded if they did not report injury or fatality as one of the outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1367","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139109855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The main objective of this review is to answer the following research question: What are the effects of the FRIENDS preventive programme on anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents? Further, the review will attempt to answer if the effects differ between participant age groups, participant socio-economic status, type of prevention (universal, selective or indicated), type of provider (lay or mental health provider), country of implementation (Australia or other countries) and implementation issues in relation to the booster sessions and parent sessions (implemented, partly implemented or not at all).
{"title":"PROTOCOL: The FRIENDS preventive programme for reducing anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents: A systematic review","authors":"Trine Filges, Geir Smedslund, Tine Eriksen, Kirsten Birkefoss","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1374","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1374","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 <p>This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The main objective of this review is to answer the following research question: What are the effects of the FRIENDS preventive programme on anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents? Further, the review will attempt to answer if the effects differ between participant age groups, participant socio-economic status, type of prevention (universal, selective or indicated), type of provider (lay or mental health provider), country of implementation (Australia or other countries) and implementation issues in relation to the booster sessions and parent sessions (implemented, partly implemented or not at all).</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1374","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138678997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Claire J. McCartan, Jennifer Roberts, Julie-Ann Jordan
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Globally, children are legally obliged to attend school at a certain age (ranging from 4 to 7 years old). Developmental differences are rarely considered at school entry nor are they always reflected in the teaching and learning environment. Children who start school without being ready to cope may be significantly disadvantaged. Failure at school can impact directly on long-term outcomes such as unemployment, crime, adolescent pregnancy, and psychological and physical morbidity in adulthood. In contrast, experiencing success at school can impact positively on a child's self esteem, behaviour, attitude, and future outcomes. School readiness interventions aim to prepare a child for the academic content of education and the psychosocial competencies considered important for learning such as self-regulation, listening, following instructions and learning to share in play and other social settings. There is a need for evidence of the effectiveness of centre-based school readiness interventions.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Objectives</h3> <p>To evaluate the effectiveness of centre-based interventions for improving school readiness in preschool children.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Search Methods</h3> <p>In October 2021 we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO, ERIC, eight additional databases and three trials registers. Other eligible studies were identified through handsearches of reference lists, reports, reviews and relevant websites.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Selection Criteria</h3> <p>We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing centre-based school readiness interventions to no intervention, wait-list control or treatment as usual (TAU) for children (aged three to 7 years before starting compulsory education). The primary outcomes were school readiness and adverse effects.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3> <p>We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Main Results</h3> <p>We included data from 32 trials involving 16,899 children (6590 included in at least one meta-analysis). Four studies compared centre-based early education interventions with no treatment controls. Twenty-two trials compared an enriched school curriculum to treatm
{"title":"Centre-based early education interventions for improving school readiness: A systematic review","authors":"Claire J. McCartan, Jennifer Roberts, Julie-Ann Jordan","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1363","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Globally, children are legally obliged to attend school at a certain age (ranging from 4 to 7 years old). Developmental differences are rarely considered at school entry nor are they always reflected in the teaching and learning environment. Children who start school without being ready to cope may be significantly disadvantaged. Failure at school can impact directly on long-term outcomes such as unemployment, crime, adolescent pregnancy, and psychological and physical morbidity in adulthood. In contrast, experiencing success at school can impact positively on a child's self esteem, behaviour, attitude, and future outcomes. School readiness interventions aim to prepare a child for the academic content of education and the psychosocial competencies considered important for learning such as self-regulation, listening, following instructions and learning to share in play and other social settings. There is a need for evidence of the effectiveness of centre-based school readiness interventions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To evaluate the effectiveness of centre-based interventions for improving school readiness in preschool children.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In October 2021 we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, PsycINFO, ERIC, eight additional databases and three trials registers. Other eligible studies were identified through handsearches of reference lists, reports, reviews and relevant websites.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing centre-based school readiness interventions to no intervention, wait-list control or treatment as usual (TAU) for children (aged three to 7 years before starting compulsory education). The primary outcomes were school readiness and adverse effects.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Main Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We included data from 32 trials involving 16,899 children (6590 included in at least one meta-analysis). Four studies compared centre-based early education interventions with no treatment controls. Twenty-two trials compared an enriched school curriculum to treatm","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1363","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138634099","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anja Bondebjerg, Trine Filges, Jan Hyld Pejtersen, Malene Wallach Kildemoes, Hermann Burr, Peter Hasle, Emile Tompa, Elizabeth Bengtsen
Background
Unsafe and unhealthy working conditions lead to injuries and financial losses across the globe, resulting in a need for research into effective work environment interventions.
Objectives
The objective of this evidence and gap map (EGM) is to provide an overview of existing systematic reviews and primary studies examining the effects of occupational health and safety regulatory interventions.
Search Methods
Relevant studies are identified through searches in published and unpublished literature performed up to January 2023.
Selection Criteria
The population for this EGM is workers above the age of 15 and their workplaces within the OECD. We include randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies with a comparison of two or more groups of participants, and systematic reviews of effects.
Data Collection and Analysis
The map has been populated based on information about interventions and outcomes, study design, OECD country, and publication status. We have performed critical appraisal of included systematic reviews using an adjusted version of the AMSTAR-2 tool.
Main Results
The included studies for this report consist of six systematic reviews, 28 primary effect studies, and three on-going studies. The interactive map shows that the largest cluster of studies is located in the inspection activity domain, while the sickness absence outcome domain and the intervention categories for training initiatives and formulation of regulatory standards are only scarcely populated. Additionally, the AMSTAR-appraisal suggests a lack of rigorous systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Authors’ Conclusions
More research in the form of primary studies and rigorous systematic reviews is needed to provide stakeholders with better guidance as to what constitutes the most efficient regulatory approaches to improve the work environment.
{"title":"Occupational health and safety regulatory interventions to improve the work environment: An evidence and gap map of effectiveness studies","authors":"Anja Bondebjerg, Trine Filges, Jan Hyld Pejtersen, Malene Wallach Kildemoes, Hermann Burr, Peter Hasle, Emile Tompa, Elizabeth Bengtsen","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1371","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1371","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Unsafe and unhealthy working conditions lead to injuries and financial losses across the globe, resulting in a need for research into effective work environment interventions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The objective of this evidence and gap map (EGM) is to provide an overview of existing systematic reviews and primary studies examining the effects of occupational health and safety regulatory interventions.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Relevant studies are identified through searches in published and unpublished literature performed up to January 2023.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The population for this EGM is workers above the age of 15 and their workplaces within the OECD. We include randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies with a comparison of two or more groups of participants, and systematic reviews of effects.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data Collection and Analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The map has been populated based on information about interventions and outcomes, study design, OECD country, and publication status. We have performed critical appraisal of included systematic reviews using an adjusted version of the AMSTAR-2 tool.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Main Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The included studies for this report consist of six systematic reviews, 28 primary effect studies, and three on-going studies. The interactive map shows that the largest cluster of studies is located in the inspection activity domain, while the sickness absence outcome domain and the intervention categories for training initiatives and formulation of regulatory standards are only scarcely populated. Additionally, the AMSTAR-appraisal suggests a lack of rigorous systematic reviews and meta-analyses.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Authors’ Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>More research in the form of primary studies and rigorous systematic reviews is needed to provide stakeholders with better guidance as to what constitutes the most efficient regulatory approaches to improve the work environment.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1371","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138571011","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Denise Rousseau, Byeong Jo Kim, Ryan Splenda, Sarah Young, Jangbum Lee, Donna Beck
<div> <section> <h3> Background</h3> <p>Financial incentives for chief executive officers (CEOs) are thought to motivate them to lead their company toward achieving important business objectives. Based on the Rousseau et al. (2019) protocol, this systematic review assesses the predictive effects of CEO incentives on certain business outcomes.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Objectives</h3> <p>This review addresses whether CEO financial incentives predict: (1) firm financial performance and (2) financial restatement due to misreporting.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Search methods</h3> <p>We searched nine research databases for published peer-reviewed literature (to July 23–26, 2021 and an attenuated search from those dates to July 27–31, 2023) and thirteen professional association websites for non-published gray literature (to August 2021). We also hand-searched selected relevant journals.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Selection criteria</h3> <p>We reviewed peer-reviewed and unpublished studies available in English since 1980. Eligible studies regarding our first question assessed CEO financial incentives (1) 1 year or more before the measurement of outcomes, (2) controlled for pre-incentive firm performance or market conditions, and (3) analyzed CEO financial incentives as predictors of firm outcomes. Eligible studies regarding our second question assessed whether financial restatement had occurred and analyzed effects of CEO incentives on this outcome.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3> <p>We extracted standardized regression coefficients for each effect or converted unstandardized regressions to standardized. Analyses were conducted using STATA. All studies were assessed to have moderate risk of bias.</p> </section> <section> <h3> Main results</h3> <p>For our first question, 20 studies (15,398 firms) met our criteria for meta-analysis of effects. Bonuses, the most commonly studied incentive, had a small positive effect on next year's accounting performance metric Return on Assets (ROA, 0.046 [<i>k</i> = 7, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.014, 0.078]). The bonus effect in the market-related metric of Stock Returns (−0.026 [<i>k</i> = 5, 95% CI = −0.119, 0.067]) fell within a CI including 0, as did its effect on another market-related metric, Market-to-Book value (Tobin's Q, 0.028 [<i>k</i> = 3, 95% CI = −0.024, 0.08]).
{"title":"Does chief executive compensation predict financial performance or inaccurate financial reporting in listed companies: A systematic review","authors":"Denise Rousseau, Byeong Jo Kim, Ryan Splenda, Sarah Young, Jangbum Lee, Donna Beck","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1370","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1370","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Financial incentives for chief executive officers (CEOs) are thought to motivate them to lead their company toward achieving important business objectives. Based on the Rousseau et al. (2019) protocol, this systematic review assesses the predictive effects of CEO incentives on certain business outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This review addresses whether CEO financial incentives predict: (1) firm financial performance and (2) financial restatement due to misreporting.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We searched nine research databases for published peer-reviewed literature (to July 23–26, 2021 and an attenuated search from those dates to July 27–31, 2023) and thirteen professional association websites for non-published gray literature (to August 2021). We also hand-searched selected relevant journals.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We reviewed peer-reviewed and unpublished studies available in English since 1980. Eligible studies regarding our first question assessed CEO financial incentives (1) 1 year or more before the measurement of outcomes, (2) controlled for pre-incentive firm performance or market conditions, and (3) analyzed CEO financial incentives as predictors of firm outcomes. Eligible studies regarding our second question assessed whether financial restatement had occurred and analyzed effects of CEO incentives on this outcome.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We extracted standardized regression coefficients for each effect or converted unstandardized regressions to standardized. Analyses were conducted using STATA. All studies were assessed to have moderate risk of bias.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Main results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>For our first question, 20 studies (15,398 firms) met our criteria for meta-analysis of effects. Bonuses, the most commonly studied incentive, had a small positive effect on next year's accounting performance metric Return on Assets (ROA, 0.046 [<i>k</i> = 7, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.014, 0.078]). The bonus effect in the market-related metric of Stock Returns (−0.026 [<i>k</i> = 5, 95% CI = −0.119, 0.067]) fell within a CI including 0, as did its effect on another market-related metric, Market-to-Book value (Tobin's Q, 0.028 [<i>k</i> = 3, 95% CI = −0.024, 0.08]).","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1370","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138571010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zijun Li MPH, Mina Ma, Yongqi Yang, Yanfei Li, Ke Guo, Minyan Yang, Guanghua Liu, Kehu Yang
This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. We will solve the following questions: (1) What are the characteristics of skills training services for individuals experiencing or at risk of homelessness? (2) How effectively do the different skills training programs improve employment status, work and life skills, or housing stability? (3) What factors are associated with the variation in the effectiveness of skills training services?
{"title":"PROTOCOL: The effectiveness of skills training to increase employment among those experiencing and at risk of homelessness: A systematic review","authors":"Zijun Li MPH, Mina Ma, Yongqi Yang, Yanfei Li, Ke Guo, Minyan Yang, Guanghua Liu, Kehu Yang","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1372","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1372","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. We will solve the following questions: (1) What are the characteristics of skills training services for individuals experiencing or at risk of homelessness? (2) How effectively do the different skills training programs improve employment status, work and life skills, or housing stability? (3) What factors are associated with the variation in the effectiveness of skills training services?</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1372","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138559070","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The objectives of the present study are to answer the following questions: (1) What types of home-based interventions are currently being studied to prevent child neglect? (2) How effective are the different home-based interventions for preventing child neglect? (3) What are the causes of heterogeneity among included studies and their impact on study effects?
{"title":"PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of home-based interventions to prevent child neglect: A systematic review","authors":"Yanfei Li, Rui Li, Meixuan Li, Zhitong Bing, Xiuxia Li, Kehu Yang","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1373","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1373","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The objectives of the present study are to answer the following questions: (1) What types of home-based interventions are currently being studied to prevent child neglect? (2) How effective are the different home-based interventions for preventing child neglect? (3) What are the causes of heterogeneity among included studies and their impact on study effects?</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1373","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138491459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Details of new titles for systematic reviews or evidence and gap maps that have been accepted by the Editor of a Campbell Coordinating Group are published in each issue of the journal. If you would like to receive a copy of the approved title registration form, please send an email to the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group.</p><p>A list of discontinued protocols appears below these new titles. If you are interested to continue a project, please get in touch with the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group or email <span>[email protected]</span>.</p><p>Gender diversity on corporate boards and the relationship to corporate financial performance: Is gender in corporate boards settings of any importance? A systematic review and meta-analysis</p><p>Anders McIlquham-Schmidt, Cédric Velghe</p><p>31 October 2023</p><p>Breakfast consumption, anthropometry, and nutrition-related outcomes in adolescents from low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis</p><p>Jordie Fischer, Jonathan Thomas, Kesso van Zutphen-Küffer, Despo Ierodiakonou, Klaus Kraemer, Vanessa Garcia-Larsen</p><p>13 November 2023</p><p>Role of behavioral and monetary interventions in reducing energy consumption in households: A ‘living’ systematic review</p><p>Jan Minx, Tarun Khanna, Max Callaghan, Klaas Miersch, Julian Elliot, Mark Andor</p><p>19 September 2023</p><p>Interventions to identify violence against women in high-income countries: An evidence and gap map of impact evaluations</p><p>Charlotte Bell, Lorelei Hine, Lauren Hamilton, Elizabeth Watt, Elizabeth Eggins, Angela Higginson</p><p>20 November 2023</p><p>Identifying evidence-based guidance for anti-racism allyship in higher education: A scoping review</p><p>Marian Luctkar-Flude, Laura Killam, Alexandra Hodson, Monica Larocque, Nikita Gupta, Amanda Ross-White, Jane Tyerman</p><p>18 September 2023</p><p>Effective teacher preparation programs for improving academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis</p><p>Roisin Corcoran, Sarah Miller, Joanne O'Flaherty, Patrick Labelle</p><p>27 October 2023</p><p>The effects of creative arts therapy on the treatment of alcohol and other drugs related problems: A mixed methods systematic review</p><p>Arianne Reis, Kaniz Fatema, Philip Hayward, Anna Kearns, Nicole Peel, Gilbert Whitton</p><p>12 October 2023</p><p>If you are interested to continue one of the projects below, please get in touch with the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group or email <span>[email protected]</span>.</p><p>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.85</p><p>PROTOCOL: Mandatory arrest for misdemeanor domestic violence effects on repeat offending</p><p>Barak Ariel, Lawrence W. Sherman</p><p>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.163</p><p>PROTOCOL: Provision of information and communications technology (ICT) for improving academic achievement and school engagement in students aged 4–18</p><p>Kristin Liabo, Laurenz Langer, Ant
已被坎贝尔协调小组的编辑接受的系统评论或证据和差距图的新标题的详细信息发表在每期杂志上。如果您希望收到已批准的所有权登记表的副本，请发送电子邮件给相关协调小组的执行编辑。在这些新标题下面列出了已终止的协议清单。如果您有兴趣继续一个项目，请与相关协调小组的执行编辑联系，或发送电子邮件至[email protected]。公司董事会的性别多样性及其与公司财务绩效的关系:公司董事会的性别设置是否重要?来自低收入和中等收入国家青少年的早餐消费、人体测量和营养相关结果:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析jordie Fischer, Jonathan Thomas, Kesso van zutphenk - k<e:1>， Despo Ierodiakonou, Klaus Kraemer, Vanessa garcia - larsen2023年11月13日行为和货币干预在减少家庭能源消耗中的作用:jan Minx, Tarun Khanna, Max Callaghan, Klaas Miersch, Julian Elliot, Mark andor2023年9月19日高收入国家识别暴力侵害妇女行为的干预措施:影响评估的证据和差距图charlotte Bell, Lorelei Hine, Lauren Hamilton, Elizabeth Watt, Elizabeth Eggins, Angela higginson2023年11月20日确定高等教育中反种族主义联盟的循证指导:范围回顾marian luctka - flude, Laura Killam, Alexandra Hodson, Monica Larocque, Nikita Gupta, Amanda Ross-White, Jane tyerman 2023年9月18日提高学习成绩的有效教师准备计划:系统回顾和元分析roisin Corcoran, Sarah Miller, Joanne O'Flaherty, Patrick label2023年10月27日创意艺术疗法对治疗酒精和其他药物相关问题的影响:warianne Reis, Kaniz Fatema, Philip Hayward, Anna Kearns, Nicole Peel, Gilbert whitton2023年10月12日如果您有兴趣继续下面的一个项目，请与相关协调小组的执行编辑联系或发送电子邮件[email protected].https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.85PROTOCOL:巴拉克·阿里尔，劳伦斯·w·谢尔曼对轻罪家庭暴力对重复犯罪的影响强制逮捕https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.163PROTOCOL:为提高4 - 18岁学生的学习成绩和学校参与度提供信息和通信技术(ICT)克里斯汀·利亚博，劳伦兹·兰格，安东尼娅·西蒙，凯西-安·丹尼尔-吉滕斯，亚历克斯·埃尔威克，珍妮丝·特里普内https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.110PROTOCOL:为改善患有慢性疾病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学习成绩提供教育支持服务米歇尔·a·托利特，苏珊·m·索耶，萨维蒂里·拉特纳帕兰，托尼·巴内蒂普斯://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.197PROTOCOL:电子辅导促进25岁以下年轻人的积极青年成果:一项系统综述罗本·m·奥康纳，大卫·l·杜波依斯，露西·鲍斯https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.166PROTOCOL:在中小学教育中，提高教师留任率、教师满意度和学生成绩的绩效薪酬计划:一项系统回顾gary Ritter, Julie Trivitt, Leesa Foreman, Corey DeAngelis, George Dennyhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.1186PROTOCOL:全麦饮食摄入与非传染性疾病之间的关系wasim A. Iqbal, Gavin B. Stewart, Abigail Smith, Linda Errington, Chris J. Sealhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.84PROTOCOL:降低孕妇、哺乳期妇女和育龄妇女死亡率和发病率的营养干预和方案:一项系统综述philippa midlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.171PROTOCOL:以色列F. N. Domingos, Marcin Baranski, Carlo Leifert, Ismail Cakmak, Zed Rengel, Paul E. Bilsborrow, Gavin B. Stewarthttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.138PROTOCOL:改善危机环境下孕产妇、新生儿和妇女生殖健康sprrimus Che Chi, Henrik Urdal, Odidika UJ Umeora, johane Sundby, Paul Spiegel, Declan Devanehttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.183PROTOCOL:社区层面女性经济赋权干预措施对人类发展的影响marcela Ibanez, Sarah Khan, Anna Minasyan, Soham Sahoo, Pooja Balasubramanianhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2 154 .议定书:降低艾滋病毒阳性妇女发病率和死亡率的同伴干预措施。佩特科维奇，M. Doull, A. M. O'Connor, J. Aweya, M. Yoganathan, V. Welch, G. A. Wells, P. Tugwellhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.188PROTOCOL:低收入和中等收入国家农村地区社区主导的全面卫生设施:效果和影响因素证据的系统评价[j] josef Novotný， Jiří Hasman, Martin lepije, Vít Bořilhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.140PROTOCOL:获得电力改善中低收入国家的健康、教育和福利kavita Mathur、Sandy Oliver、Janice tripney改善中低收入国家储蓄行为和减少贫困的储蓄促进干预措施janina Isabel Steinert、Ani Movsisya
{"title":"Campbell title registrations to date – November 2023, and discontinued protocols","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1375","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1375","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Details of new titles for systematic reviews or evidence and gap maps that have been accepted by the Editor of a Campbell Coordinating Group are published in each issue of the journal. If you would like to receive a copy of the approved title registration form, please send an email to the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group.</p><p>A list of discontinued protocols appears below these new titles. If you are interested to continue a project, please get in touch with the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group or email <span>[email protected]</span>.</p><p>Gender diversity on corporate boards and the relationship to corporate financial performance: Is gender in corporate boards settings of any importance? A systematic review and meta-analysis</p><p>Anders McIlquham-Schmidt, Cédric Velghe</p><p>31 October 2023</p><p>Breakfast consumption, anthropometry, and nutrition-related outcomes in adolescents from low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis</p><p>Jordie Fischer, Jonathan Thomas, Kesso van Zutphen-Küffer, Despo Ierodiakonou, Klaus Kraemer, Vanessa Garcia-Larsen</p><p>13 November 2023</p><p>Role of behavioral and monetary interventions in reducing energy consumption in households: A ‘living’ systematic review</p><p>Jan Minx, Tarun Khanna, Max Callaghan, Klaas Miersch, Julian Elliot, Mark Andor</p><p>19 September 2023</p><p>Interventions to identify violence against women in high-income countries: An evidence and gap map of impact evaluations</p><p>Charlotte Bell, Lorelei Hine, Lauren Hamilton, Elizabeth Watt, Elizabeth Eggins, Angela Higginson</p><p>20 November 2023</p><p>Identifying evidence-based guidance for anti-racism allyship in higher education: A scoping review</p><p>Marian Luctkar-Flude, Laura Killam, Alexandra Hodson, Monica Larocque, Nikita Gupta, Amanda Ross-White, Jane Tyerman</p><p>18 September 2023</p><p>Effective teacher preparation programs for improving academic achievement: A systematic review and meta-analysis</p><p>Roisin Corcoran, Sarah Miller, Joanne O'Flaherty, Patrick Labelle</p><p>27 October 2023</p><p>The effects of creative arts therapy on the treatment of alcohol and other drugs related problems: A mixed methods systematic review</p><p>Arianne Reis, Kaniz Fatema, Philip Hayward, Anna Kearns, Nicole Peel, Gilbert Whitton</p><p>12 October 2023</p><p>If you are interested to continue one of the projects below, please get in touch with the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group or email <span>[email protected]</span>.</p><p>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.85</p><p>PROTOCOL: Mandatory arrest for misdemeanor domestic violence effects on repeat offending</p><p>Barak Ariel, Lawrence W. Sherman</p><p>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/CL2.163</p><p>PROTOCOL: Provision of information and communications technology (ICT) for improving academic achievement and school engagement in students aged 4–18</p><p>Kristin Liabo, Laurenz Langer, Ant","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"19 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1375","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138480884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：