Birkenmaier, J., B. R. Maynard, H. M. Blumhagen, and H. Shanks. 2024. “Medical-Financial Partnerships for Improving Financial and Medical Outcomes for Lower-Income Americans: A Systematic Review.” Campbell Systematic Reviews 20: e70008.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70008.
Below reference has been added to the reference list as well as cited in text in Section 4.2.1. It was missing in the originally published article.
Sterne, J. A. C., J. Savović, M. J. Page, et al. 2019. “RoB 2: A Revised Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials.” BMJ 366: l4898.
We apologize for this error.
[此更正文章DOI: 10.1002/cl2.70008.]。
{"title":"Correction to “Medical-Financial Partnerships for Improving Financial and Medical Outcomes for Lower-Income Americans: A Systematic Review”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70066","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cl2.70066","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Birkenmaier, J., B. R. Maynard, H. M. Blumhagen, and H. Shanks. 2024. “Medical-Financial Partnerships for Improving Financial and Medical Outcomes for Lower-Income Americans: A Systematic Review.” <i>Campbell Systematic Reviews</i> 20: e70008.</p><p>https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70008.</p><p>Below reference has been added to the reference list as well as cited in text in Section 4.2.1. It was missing in the originally published article.</p><p>Sterne, J. A. C., J. Savović, M. J. Page, et al. 2019. “RoB 2: A Revised Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials.” <i>BMJ</i> 366: l4898.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439182/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145081913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Details of new titles for systematic reviews or evidence and gap maps that have been accepted by the Editor of a Campbell Coordinating Group are published in each issue of the journal. If you would like to receive a copy of the approved title registration form, please send an email to the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group.
A list of discontinued protocols appears below these new titles. If you are interested to continue a project, please get in touch with the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group or email [email protected].
The Impact of Technology Designed to Enhance IADL Management in Older Adults With Neurodegenerative Conditions on Informal Caregiver Wellbeing: A Systematic Review
Kevin Gines, Alyssa Weakley, Sarah Tomaszewski, Beth Tweedy, Bruce Abbott, Kaila Labrador, Rachel Park
14 August 2025
Interactions in Dementia Therapies: A Systematic Review
Ivy Meihua Su, Winsy Wing Sze Wong, Keyu Li
30 June 2025
Emerging Roles and Care Impacts of Geriatric Pharmacists in Outpatient Multidisciplinary Frailty and Geriatric Syndrome Management: A Systematic Review
Ravi Shankar, Fiona Devi, Xu Qian
14 August 2025
Physical Activity and Quality of Life in Older Adults With Chronic Illness and Disability: A Scoping Review
Wei Wei, Huaijin Xu, Xiaotian Gao, J. J. Pionke, Chungyi Chiu
14 August 2025
Mapping Financial Literacy Programs for the Ageing Population: Protocol for a Scoping Review Populations
Carina Sofia Teixeira Fernandes, Isabel Silva, Inês Gomes
2 September 2025
The Impact of Chatbot Customer Service in the E-Commerce Industry on User Satisfaction: A Systematic Review
Dual-Career Academic Couples: A Scoping Review of Drivers, Benefits and Challenges
Blandine Ribotta, Antonia Velicu, Peter Hilpert, Bruno Lemaitre
20 June 2024
The Causal Impacts of Digital Training for Entrepreneurs in Developing Countries
Alejandro Estefan, Paul Winters
5 June 2025
The Use of Digital Platforms to Enhance Adolescents' Sexual Reproductive Health Literacy in the Southern African Development Community: A Scoping Review
Olubunmi Ogbodu, Ayobami Adekola
22 June 2025
Global Incidence and Prevalence of Paediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome (PANS) and Paediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorder Associated With Streptococcal Infection (PANDAS) Diagnostic Label in Children Under 18 Years Old. A Systematic Review
Blessing Aina, Alastair Sutcliffe, Kate Green, Yan Lu
22 June 2025
Later-Life Consequences of Firearm Violence Exposure in Childhood and Adolescence: A Systematic Review
Diego A. Diaz-Faes, Charles Branas, Sonali Rajan
22 June 2025
Understanding Resilience in School Bullying Among Generation Y and Z: A Scoping Re
已被坎贝尔协调小组的编辑接受的系统评论或证据和差距图的新标题的详细信息发表在每期杂志上。如果您希望收到已批准的所有权登记表的副本，请发送电子邮件给相关协调小组的执行编辑。在这些新标题下面列出了已终止的协议清单。如果您有兴趣继续一个项目，请与相关协调小组的执行编辑联系，或发送电子邮件至[email protected]。系统回顾：提高老年神经退行性疾病患者IADL管理技术对非正式照顾者幸福感的影响[j] . kevin Gines, Alyssa Weakley, Sarah Tomaszewski, Beth Tweedy, Bruce Abbott, Kaila Labrador, Rachel Park14 August 2025苏美华，黄颖思，李keyu 30 June 2025老年药师在门诊多学科虚弱和老年综合征管理中的新角色和护理影响：系统综述wravi Shankar， Fiona Devi，徐倩14 August 2025老年慢性病和残疾患者的身体活动和生活质量研究综述魏伟，徐怀金，高晓天，潘金杰，邱忠义14 2018.08人口老龄化金融素养规划：研究综述方案scarina Sofia Teixeira Fernandes， Isabel Silva, Inês Gomes2 2015.09电子商务行业聊天机器人客户服务对用户满意度的影响赵雪梅，孙志飞，张一杰，郭丽萍，温玉峰，周文杰3 2015.07双职业学术夫妇驱动因素、利益和挑战的范围审查blandine Ribotta， Antonia Velicu, Peter Hilpert， Bruno lemaitre2024年6月20日数字培训对发展中国家企业家的因果影响alejandro Estefan， Paul winters2025年6月5日使用数字平台提高南部非洲发展共同体青少年的性生殖健康素养：18岁以下儿童急性发作性神经精神综合征（PANS）和与链球菌感染相关的儿科自身免疫性神经精神障碍（PANDAS）诊断标签的全球发病率和患病率。系统回顾- blessing Aina， Alastair Sutcliffe, Kate Green， luyan 2025年6月22日儿童和青少年接触枪支暴力对后期生活的影响：系统回顾 Diaz-Faes, Charles Branas, Sonali rajan， 2025年6月22日理解Y世代和Z世代学校欺凌的弹性：小学和中学教育的范围审查刘洪阳，Jana Kvintova, Lucie Vachova， Jiří kantor2025年8月13日评估问题社交媒体使用：基于COSMIN方法和TARES声明的范围审查方案amanda Cardoso， Matheus Rodrigues, Helen mavician, Victor Formigoni, Jessica Maruyama， Alexandre serpa2015年8月13日mirna Amaya, Kaloyan Kamenov, Lucero Lopez-Perez, Ricardo Martinez, Omar Dewidar, Elizabeth Centeno Tablante, Gerardo Zamora, Marian Flaxman, Lindsay Bahureksa, Samantha Huey, Saurabh Mehta， Juan Peña-Rosas13 August 2025伴侣支持与母乳喂养自我效率的关系全球混合方法综合系统评价方案eman Sharara， Rana Rizk, Bahia Abdallah, Rachael Eastham， Mark limmer2025年6月22日气候变化下提高农民社会生态恢复力的预测因素：系统评价putri Setyowati， Maria Rola-Rubzen, Ram Pandit， Emanuel gomz2025年8月14日法医精神病学护理中体重增加的决定因素：系统评价与元分析——justine Anthony， Joseph Lloyd Davies， Maria goodwin2025年6月27日医学生和初级医生的同情疲劳：一项范围审查方案jane Graves， Caroline Joyce, Moin Ahmed， Iman hegazi2025年8月4日在校大学生的教育倦怠和精神障碍：系统评价协议klaudia Bochniarz， paweowjurek， paweowatroszko2025年8月4日在教育环境中使用实时视觉反馈技术：范围ReviewGlòria Vila Aymerich， Miquel alsin2025年8月4日探索使用模拟来教授临床医生灵性：混合方法的系统回顾——lorraine Henshaw， Adam Boughey, Jessica Runacres, Wilfred McSherry， Joseph natalello2015年5月20日sperez Kirya， Peter Kasadha, Francis Kizito, Ally Kinyaga, rona Mijumbi-Deve, Rose Izizinga， Edward kayongo2015年5月20日高等教育环境中反dei政策的文献现状惠伦·Yates， Arthur Frankel, David Conley, Jenneffer Sixkiller， Morgan Stone6 June 25全球育龄妇女和女童经期卫生管理的可重复使用卫生巾与一次性卫生巾对比yain Yuh， Charlotte Ndum, Damaris Ntam, Clarisse Chenwi, Ernest Alang， Patrick Okwen14 July 25公立医院远程医疗信息安全现状与机遇：系统综述改善心理健康专业人员招聘和保留的干预措施：系统综述narendar Manohar， Hiroko Fujimoto, Jeff Looi, Paul Maguire, Stephen Kisley, Tarun Bastiampillai, Stephen Robson, Samuel Harvey， Peter baldwin 2015年7月15日作者：Mark Valencia Arroyo， Shona Bates，林家玲，Rafal Chomik, Peter Brown, Chris Dietz, Limin Mao， Michael kidd[3] 2025年7月女性领导力发展项目结果：系统评价和荟萃分析[d] daisy Morris， Kathleen Riach, Sana Rauf， Helena tede3] 2025年7月减少抗生素耐药性（AMR）和改善临床结果的抗菌药物管理（AMS）干预措施的有效性和实施混合方法方法。Rajalakshmi, Jayaraj Mymbilly Balakrishnan, Sreedharan Nair, Sohil Khan, Mohammed Salim, Uday
{"title":"Campbell Title Registrations to Date – September 2025, and Discontinued Protocols","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70067","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cl2.70067","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Details of new titles for systematic reviews or evidence and gap maps that have been accepted by the Editor of a Campbell Coordinating Group are published in each issue of the journal. If you would like to receive a copy of the approved title registration form, please send an email to the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group.</p><p>A list of discontinued protocols appears below these new titles. If you are interested to continue a project, please get in touch with the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group or email <span>[email protected]</span>.</p><p>The Impact of Technology Designed to Enhance IADL Management in Older Adults With Neurodegenerative Conditions on Informal Caregiver Wellbeing: A Systematic Review</p><p>Kevin Gines, Alyssa Weakley, Sarah Tomaszewski, Beth Tweedy, Bruce Abbott, Kaila Labrador, Rachel Park</p><p>14 August 2025</p><p>Interactions in Dementia Therapies: A Systematic Review</p><p>Ivy Meihua Su, Winsy Wing Sze Wong, Keyu Li</p><p>30 June 2025</p><p>Emerging Roles and Care Impacts of Geriatric Pharmacists in Outpatient Multidisciplinary Frailty and Geriatric Syndrome Management: A Systematic Review</p><p>Ravi Shankar, Fiona Devi, Xu Qian</p><p>14 August 2025</p><p>Physical Activity and Quality of Life in Older Adults With Chronic Illness and Disability: A Scoping Review</p><p>Wei Wei, Huaijin Xu, Xiaotian Gao, J. J. Pionke, Chungyi Chiu</p><p>14 August 2025</p><p>Mapping Financial Literacy Programs for the Ageing Population: Protocol for a Scoping Review Populations</p><p>Carina Sofia Teixeira Fernandes, Isabel Silva, Inês Gomes</p><p>2 September 2025</p><p>The Impact of Chatbot Customer Service in the E-Commerce Industry on User Satisfaction: A Systematic Review</p><p>Xuemei Zhao, Zhifei Sun, Yijie Zhang, Liping Guo, Yufeng Wen, Wenjie Zhou</p><p>3 July 2025</p><p>Dual-Career Academic Couples: A Scoping Review of Drivers, Benefits and Challenges</p><p>Blandine Ribotta, Antonia Velicu, Peter Hilpert, Bruno Lemaitre</p><p>20 June 2024</p><p>The Causal Impacts of Digital Training for Entrepreneurs in Developing Countries</p><p>Alejandro Estefan, Paul Winters</p><p>5 June 2025</p><p>The Use of Digital Platforms to Enhance Adolescents' Sexual Reproductive Health Literacy in the Southern African Development Community: A Scoping Review</p><p>Olubunmi Ogbodu, Ayobami Adekola</p><p>22 June 2025</p><p>Global Incidence and Prevalence of Paediatric Acute-Onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome (PANS) and Paediatric Autoimmune Neuropsychiatric Disorder Associated With Streptococcal Infection (PANDAS) Diagnostic Label in Children Under 18 Years Old. A Systematic Review</p><p>Blessing Aina, Alastair Sutcliffe, Kate Green, Yan Lu</p><p>22 June 2025</p><p>Later-Life Consequences of Firearm Violence Exposure in Childhood and Adolescence: A Systematic Review</p><p>Diego A. Diaz-Faes, Charles Branas, Sonali Rajan</p><p>22 June 2025</p><p>Understanding Resilience in School Bullying Among Generation Y and Z: A Scoping Re","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439170/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145081778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Nina Ashley O. Dela Cruz, Alyssa Cyrielle B. Villanueva, Lovely Tolin, Sabrina Disse, Robert Lensink, Howard White
<p>Micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) account for most firms in most economies, particularly in developing nations, and are key contributors to job creation and global economic development. However, the most significant impediment to MSME development in low- and middle-income countries is a lack of access to both investment and working capital financing. Due to a lack of essential track record, appropriate collateral, and credit history, MSMEs are frequently denied business loans by traditional lending institutions. In addition, MSMEs face institutional, structural, and non-financial factors that further impede access to funding. To address this, both public and private sectors employ indirect and direct finance interventions to help MSMEs in developing and emerging economies enhance and increase their financing needs. Given the importance of MSMEs in the economy, a comprehensive overview and systematic synthesizing of the evidence of the effects of financial access interventions for MSMEs, capturing a wide variety of outcome variables, is useful. The objective of this evidence and gap map (EGM) is to describe the existing evidence on the effects of various interventions dedicated to supporting and improving MSMEs' access to credit, as well as the corresponding firm performance and/or welfare outcomes. An EGM is a systematic evidence product that displays the existing evidence relevant to a specific research question. To better understand the various interventions dedicated to supporting and improving MSMEs' access to credit, as well as their outcomes, we conducted electronic searches in databases using various search strings. This search strategy was supplemented with gray literature searches and systematic review citation tracking to ensure that the research team had identified a significant portion of relevant research works. We included studies that examined interventions aimed at enhancing MSMEs' access to finance in low- and middle-income countries, targeting MSMEs including households, smallholder farmers and single person enterprise, as well as financial institutions/agencies and their staff. This EGM considered five types of interventions: (i) strategy, legislation and regulatory; (ii) financing systems and institutions; (iii) access facilitation; (iv) lending instruments or financial products; and (v) demand-side programs for financial literacy. On the other hand, the EGM also covered outcome domains for policy environment, financial inclusion, firm performance, and welfare. Both impact evaluations and systematic reviews of relevant interventions for a previously defined target population were included in this EGM, whether they had experimental or non-experimental designs. We considered studies that were completed or in progress. All eligible studies included a suitable comparison group for interventions. For practical reasons, studies were limited to papers written in English, with no restrictions by publication date. B
{"title":"Effects of Interventions to Improve Access to Financial Services for Micro, Small, and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Evidence and Gap Map","authors":"Nina Ashley O. Dela Cruz, Alyssa Cyrielle B. Villanueva, Lovely Tolin, Sabrina Disse, Robert Lensink, Howard White","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70061","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) account for most firms in most economies, particularly in developing nations, and are key contributors to job creation and global economic development. However, the most significant impediment to MSME development in low- and middle-income countries is a lack of access to both investment and working capital financing. Due to a lack of essential track record, appropriate collateral, and credit history, MSMEs are frequently denied business loans by traditional lending institutions. In addition, MSMEs face institutional, structural, and non-financial factors that further impede access to funding. To address this, both public and private sectors employ indirect and direct finance interventions to help MSMEs in developing and emerging economies enhance and increase their financing needs. Given the importance of MSMEs in the economy, a comprehensive overview and systematic synthesizing of the evidence of the effects of financial access interventions for MSMEs, capturing a wide variety of outcome variables, is useful. The objective of this evidence and gap map (EGM) is to describe the existing evidence on the effects of various interventions dedicated to supporting and improving MSMEs' access to credit, as well as the corresponding firm performance and/or welfare outcomes. An EGM is a systematic evidence product that displays the existing evidence relevant to a specific research question. To better understand the various interventions dedicated to supporting and improving MSMEs' access to credit, as well as their outcomes, we conducted electronic searches in databases using various search strings. This search strategy was supplemented with gray literature searches and systematic review citation tracking to ensure that the research team had identified a significant portion of relevant research works. We included studies that examined interventions aimed at enhancing MSMEs' access to finance in low- and middle-income countries, targeting MSMEs including households, smallholder farmers and single person enterprise, as well as financial institutions/agencies and their staff. This EGM considered five types of interventions: (i) strategy, legislation and regulatory; (ii) financing systems and institutions; (iii) access facilitation; (iv) lending instruments or financial products; and (v) demand-side programs for financial literacy. On the other hand, the EGM also covered outcome domains for policy environment, financial inclusion, firm performance, and welfare. Both impact evaluations and systematic reviews of relevant interventions for a previously defined target population were included in this EGM, whether they had experimental or non-experimental designs. We considered studies that were completed or in progress. All eligible studies included a suitable comparison group for interventions. For practical reasons, studies were limited to papers written in English, with no restrictions by publication date. B","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70061","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145021980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dalgaard, N. T., T. Filges, B. C. A. Viinholt, and M. Pontoppidan. 2021. “Parenting Interventions to Support Parent/Child Attachment and Psychosocial Adjustment in Foster and Adoptive Parents and Children: A Systematic Review.” Campbell Systematic Reviews 18, no. 1: e1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1209.
The “Characteristics of Included Studies” section and tables were erroneously included. Content under the “CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDIES” up until the “Characteristics of Excluded Studies” section starts has been removed.
We apologize for this error.
Dalgaard, n.t.， T. Filges, b.c.a. Viinholt和M. Pontoppidan。2021。“父母干预以支持养父母和儿童的亲子依恋和心理社会适应：系统回顾”。《坎贝尔系统评论》第18卷。1: e1209。https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1209.The“纳入研究的特征”部分和表格被错误地纳入。在“被排除研究的特征”部分开始之前，“研究的特征”下的内容已被删除。我们为这个错误道歉。
{"title":"Correction to “Parenting Interventions to Support Parent/Child Attachment and Psychosocial Adjustment in Foster and Adoptive Parents and Children: A Systematic Review”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70064","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dalgaard, N. T., T. Filges, B. C. A. Viinholt, and M. Pontoppidan. 2021. “Parenting Interventions to Support Parent/Child Attachment and Psychosocial Adjustment in Foster and Adoptive Parents and Children: A Systematic Review.” <i>Campbell Systematic Reviews</i> 18, no. 1: e1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1209.</p><p>The “Characteristics of Included Studies” section and tables were erroneously included. Content under the “CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDIES” up until the “Characteristics of Excluded Studies” section starts has been removed.</p><p>We apologize for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70064","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144869575","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Meta-analyses often use standardized mean differences (SMDs), such as Cohen's d and Hedges' g, to compare treatment effects. However, these SMDs are highly sensitive to the within-study sample variability used for their standardization, potentially distorting individual effect size estimates and compromising overall meta-analytic conclusions. This study introduces harmonized standardized mean differences (HSMDs), a novel sensitivity analysis framework designed to systematically evaluate and address such distortions. The HSMD harmonizes relative within-study variability across studies by employing the coefficient of variation (CV) to establish empirical benchmarks (e.g., CV quartiles). SMDs are then recalculated under these consistent variability assumptions. Applying this framework to Meta-analytic data reveals the extent to which (original) effect sizes and pooled results are influenced by initial, study-specific standard deviations to standardize mean differences. Furthermore, the method facilitates the inclusion of studies lacking reported variability metrics into the sensitivity analysis, enhancing the comprehensiveness of the meta-analytic synthesis.
{"title":"Standardized Mean Differences: No So Standard After All","authors":"Juyoung Jung, Ariel M. Aloe","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70056","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Meta-analyses often use standardized mean differences (SMDs), such as Cohen's <i>d</i> and Hedges' <i>g</i>, to compare treatment effects. However, these SMDs are highly sensitive to the within-study sample variability used for their standardization, potentially distorting individual effect size estimates and compromising overall meta-analytic conclusions. This study introduces harmonized standardized mean differences (HSMDs), a novel sensitivity analysis framework designed to systematically evaluate and address such distortions. The HSMD harmonizes relative within-study variability across studies by employing the coefficient of variation (CV) to establish empirical benchmarks (e.g., CV quartiles). SMDs are then recalculated under these consistent variability assumptions. Applying this framework to Meta-analytic data reveals the extent to which (original) effect sizes and pooled results are influenced by initial, study-specific standard deviations to standardize mean differences. Furthermore, the method facilitates the inclusion of studies lacking reported variability metrics into the sensitivity analysis, enhancing the comprehensiveness of the meta-analytic synthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70056","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144861815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. Identify and map all existing primary studies and systematic reviews (published and unpublished) on social, emotional, educational, and behavioural issues in families affected by parental incarceration, creating a live, searchable and publicly available Evidence and Gap Map. We will focus on children affected by parental incarceration, their caregivers, and incarcerated parents. This map will include primary studies, reviews as well as intervention and evaluation papers. The purpose of the current research is to provide researchers, practitioners, and policymakers with a map of available evidence, identifying areas that warrant additional research or synthesis, as well as highlighting gaps in our knowledge.
{"title":"Protocol: The Impact of Parental Incarceration on Families Affected: An Evidence and Gap Map: A Systematic Review","authors":"Daragh Bradshaw, Lynn Fenton, Fiona Donson, Aisling Parkes, Ben Raikes, Leonie Ludwig, Julie Poehlmann","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70055","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. Identify and map all existing primary studies and systematic reviews (published and unpublished) on social, emotional, educational, and behavioural issues in families affected by parental incarceration, creating a live, searchable and publicly available Evidence and Gap Map. We will focus on children affected by parental incarceration, their caregivers, and incarcerated parents. This map will include primary studies, reviews as well as intervention and evaluation papers. The purpose of the current research is to provide researchers, practitioners, and policymakers with a map of available evidence, identifying areas that warrant additional research or synthesis, as well as highlighting gaps in our knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70055","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144861816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Cem Yavuz, Zafeer Ravat, María Daniela Anda León, Sanghwa Lee, Paulo Fernandes, Quinn Reifmesser, Frederick Elliott Gaved, Samantha Pilato, Constanza Gonzalez Parrao, Birte Snilstveit
<p>Halfway through the final decade of actions towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), progress toward SDG7 is off track. It is estimated that by 2030, 660 million people, mainly rural populations within Sub-Saharan Africa, will be without electricity. One promising avenue to counteract this trend is the provision of decentralised, or off-grid, renewable energy. Our systematic review synthesised the rigorous evidence evaluating off-grid electrification interventions and provides policymakers, practitioners and researchers across the sustainable energy field with an updated and comprehensive analysis of the impact of off-grid electrification interventions. Our systematic review synthesised the available rigorous evidence on the effects of off-grid technologies in low- and middle-income countries. We assessed which off-grid interventions are effective at supporting access, climate and socio-economic development outcomes, how these effects vary by region, population and other intervention characteristics and the main challenges and facilitators for interventions to benefit participants. We conducted a systematic search in 18 academic databases and 29 grey literature sources. We supplemented our searches by conducting backward and forward citation tracking, publishing a call for additional studies and contacting subject experts. To identify additional qualitative studies, we performed additional searches for studies related to interventions from our included impact evaluations. We included experimental and quasi-experimental impact evaluations of interventions promoting the use and uptake of off-grid technologies in low- and middle-income countries. Interventions fell into one of four categories: the <i>direct provision</i> of technologies, the <i>opportunity to purchase/market expansion</i> of technologies, <i>subsidies and credit</i> to purchase technologies, <i>information provision</i> promoting the use of technologies. Studies in any language were included, though they must have been published since 2000. We also included qualitative studies to understand the main challenges and facilitators of intervention effectiveness. Quantitative data was extracted for all estimates deemed relevant and the risk of bias for each of these estimates was assessed independently by two reviewers. When data allowed us to do so, we calculated standardised mean differences for results from each study and used random effects meta-analysis to synthesise effectiveness findings for comparable outcomes. We provided forest plots and measures of heterogeneity for all outcomes and tested for publication bias in outcomes with more than 10 effect sizes. When feasible, we conducted moderator analysis to understand how effects varied by intervention characteristics and checked whether results were sensitive to the risk of bias score of estimates. For qualitative studies, we extracted and analysed data based on a previously developed framework for challenges and f
{"title":"Improving Energy Access, Climate and Socio-Economic Outcomes Through Off-Grid Electrification Technologies: A Systematic Review","authors":"Cem Yavuz, Zafeer Ravat, María Daniela Anda León, Sanghwa Lee, Paulo Fernandes, Quinn Reifmesser, Frederick Elliott Gaved, Samantha Pilato, Constanza Gonzalez Parrao, Birte Snilstveit","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70060","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Halfway through the final decade of actions towards the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), progress toward SDG7 is off track. It is estimated that by 2030, 660 million people, mainly rural populations within Sub-Saharan Africa, will be without electricity. One promising avenue to counteract this trend is the provision of decentralised, or off-grid, renewable energy. Our systematic review synthesised the rigorous evidence evaluating off-grid electrification interventions and provides policymakers, practitioners and researchers across the sustainable energy field with an updated and comprehensive analysis of the impact of off-grid electrification interventions. Our systematic review synthesised the available rigorous evidence on the effects of off-grid technologies in low- and middle-income countries. We assessed which off-grid interventions are effective at supporting access, climate and socio-economic development outcomes, how these effects vary by region, population and other intervention characteristics and the main challenges and facilitators for interventions to benefit participants. We conducted a systematic search in 18 academic databases and 29 grey literature sources. We supplemented our searches by conducting backward and forward citation tracking, publishing a call for additional studies and contacting subject experts. To identify additional qualitative studies, we performed additional searches for studies related to interventions from our included impact evaluations. We included experimental and quasi-experimental impact evaluations of interventions promoting the use and uptake of off-grid technologies in low- and middle-income countries. Interventions fell into one of four categories: the <i>direct provision</i> of technologies, the <i>opportunity to purchase/market expansion</i> of technologies, <i>subsidies and credit</i> to purchase technologies, <i>information provision</i> promoting the use of technologies. Studies in any language were included, though they must have been published since 2000. We also included qualitative studies to understand the main challenges and facilitators of intervention effectiveness. Quantitative data was extracted for all estimates deemed relevant and the risk of bias for each of these estimates was assessed independently by two reviewers. When data allowed us to do so, we calculated standardised mean differences for results from each study and used random effects meta-analysis to synthesise effectiveness findings for comparable outcomes. We provided forest plots and measures of heterogeneity for all outcomes and tested for publication bias in outcomes with more than 10 effect sizes. When feasible, we conducted moderator analysis to understand how effects varied by intervention characteristics and checked whether results were sensitive to the risk of bias score of estimates. For qualitative studies, we extracted and analysed data based on a previously developed framework for challenges and f","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70060","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144843472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Clarice Panyin Nyan, Gloria A. Odei Obeng-Amoako, Joseph Clottey, Sheila Agyemang Oppong, Charles Yaw Okyere, Takyiwaa Manuh, Solomon Zena Walelign, David Sarfo Ameyaw
Physical infrastructure, such as market centers and roads, can foster women's economic empowerment and gender equality and mitigate adverse effects of seasonality on availability and prices of nutritious foods. The lack of infrastructure is therefore a major challenge for agricultural development in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia—the regional focus of this study. It threatens food and nutrition security, depriving low-income consumers' access to healthy, affordable food and quality nutrition. Interestingly, previous studies show that physical infrastructure promotes inclusive growth and maximizes positive impacts such as improved well-being and sustainable development, and can contribute to the empowerment of women and girls. When infrastructural investments are planned, delivered, and managed using nutrition-sensitive, gender-inclusive, and responsive approaches, it can help to address barriers that impede access to nutritious diets, nutrition security, and structural inequities militating against women and girls at the household and market levels. Hence, investments in physical infrastructure could be a useful pathway for meeting various Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 1–No Poverty, 2–Zero Hunger, 3–Good Health and Wellbeing, 5–Gender Equality, 6–Clean water and sanitation, 7–Affordable and Clean Energy, and 8–Decent Work and Economic Growth). However, few studies have examined the evidence and gaps on infrastructure's impact on nutritious diet, women's economic empowerment, and gender equality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Evidence and gap maps are useful tools for promoting evidence-informed decision-making by making evidence and research gaps accessible to policymakers, development practitioners, and researchers. This EGM was conducted in the consultations with stakeholders. This study seeks to identify, map, and provide an overview of the existing evidence and gaps on the impact of physical infrastructure on nutritious diets, women's economic empowerment, and gender equality among low-income consumers in LMICs in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia regions. A standardized search strategy was adapted for searching published and unpublished studies in 3 academic databases, 33 institutional websites, Google, Google Scholar, 3 existing EGMs, and 8 registries of randomized control trials and pre-analysis plans from June 2022 to September 2022. Additional papers were identified through OpenAlex in EPPI-Reviewer. We supplemented the database searches by conducting hand searches and backward citation searches in identified reviews for relevant studies. We also contacted five prominent authors in the literature for relevant completed and on-going studies for the EGM. The selection criteria adapted the PICOS (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and study design) approach. The intervention was defined as those re
{"title":"The Impact of Infrastructure on Low-Income Consumers' Nutritious Diet, Women's Economic Empowerment, and Gender Equality in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Evidence and Gap Map","authors":"Clarice Panyin Nyan, Gloria A. Odei Obeng-Amoako, Joseph Clottey, Sheila Agyemang Oppong, Charles Yaw Okyere, Takyiwaa Manuh, Solomon Zena Walelign, David Sarfo Ameyaw","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70050","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 <p>Physical infrastructure, such as market centers and roads, can foster women's economic empowerment and gender equality and mitigate adverse effects of seasonality on availability and prices of nutritious foods. The lack of infrastructure is therefore a major challenge for agricultural development in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia—the regional focus of this study. It threatens food and nutrition security, depriving low-income consumers' access to healthy, affordable food and quality nutrition. Interestingly, previous studies show that physical infrastructure promotes inclusive growth and maximizes positive impacts such as improved well-being and sustainable development, and can contribute to the empowerment of women and girls. When infrastructural investments are planned, delivered, and managed using nutrition-sensitive, gender-inclusive, and responsive approaches, it can help to address barriers that impede access to nutritious diets, nutrition security, and structural inequities militating against women and girls at the household and market levels. Hence, investments in physical infrastructure could be a useful pathway for meeting various Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 1–No Poverty, 2–Zero Hunger, 3–Good Health and Wellbeing, 5–Gender Equality, 6–Clean water and sanitation, 7–Affordable and Clean Energy, and 8–Decent Work and Economic Growth). However, few studies have examined the evidence and gaps on infrastructure's impact on nutritious diet, women's economic empowerment, and gender equality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Evidence and gap maps are useful tools for promoting evidence-informed decision-making by making evidence and research gaps accessible to policymakers, development practitioners, and researchers. This EGM was conducted in the consultations with stakeholders. This study seeks to identify, map, and provide an overview of the existing evidence and gaps on the impact of physical infrastructure on nutritious diets, women's economic empowerment, and gender equality among low-income consumers in LMICs in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia regions. A standardized search strategy was adapted for searching published and unpublished studies in 3 academic databases, 33 institutional websites, Google, Google Scholar, 3 existing EGMs, and 8 registries of randomized control trials and pre-analysis plans from June 2022 to September 2022. Additional papers were identified through OpenAlex in EPPI-Reviewer. We supplemented the database searches by conducting hand searches and backward citation searches in identified reviews for relevant studies. We also contacted five prominent authors in the literature for relevant completed and on-going studies for the EGM. The selection criteria adapted the PICOS (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and study design) approach. The intervention was defined as those re","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70050","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144647405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ramona Schöne-Hoffmann, Sarah K. Schäfer, Christina David, Dorota Reis, Manuela Benick, Franziska Perels
This is a protocol for a Campbell Systematic Review. The aim of this systematic review will be to identify existing conceptualizations of general and domain-specific self-compassion and then integrate these into one comprehensive conceptualization. This newly developed general conceptualization will then be transferred to a domain-specific conceptualization of academic self-compassion.
{"title":"PROTOCOL: Summarizing and Critically Evaluating the Concepts of Self-Compassion: A Systematic Review of Conceptualizations","authors":"Ramona Schöne-Hoffmann, Sarah K. Schäfer, Christina David, Dorota Reis, Manuela Benick, Franziska Perels","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70054","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is a protocol for a Campbell Systematic Review. The aim of this systematic review will be to identify existing conceptualizations of general and domain-specific self-compassion and then integrate these into one comprehensive conceptualization. This newly developed general conceptualization will then be transferred to a domain-specific conceptualization of academic self-compassion.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70054","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144611995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This is a protocol for a Campbell Systematic Review. The review aims to synthesise the current empirical evidence on the places factors associated with hate crime victimisation. The review will also consider whether the risk and protective factors for hate crime vary according to moderating factors, such as the features of the crime, the victim, the place and cultural contextual factors.
{"title":"PROTOCOL: Correlates and Antecedents of Hate Crime: A Systematic Review of Place-Level Risk and Protective Factors","authors":"Kathryn Benier, Michelle Sydes, Angela Higginson","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70048","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70048","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is a protocol for a Campbell Systematic Review. The review aims to synthesise the current empirical evidence on the places factors associated with hate crime victimisation. The review will also consider whether the risk and protective factors for hate crime vary according to moderating factors, such as the features of the crime, the victim, the place and cultural contextual factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"21 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70048","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144573734","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号