首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online最新文献

英文 中文
Association Between Insurance Status and Recommendation for Surgery for Distal Radius Fractures 保险状况与桡骨远端骨折手术建议的关系
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100890
Emma T. Smolev MD , Rafa Rahman MD, MPH , Amy Z. Lu BS , Jarred Chow BS , Rosie McColgan MD , Jeremy Abolade MD , Sanjum Singh MD , Isabel Wolfe MD , Troy B. Amen MD, MBA , Duretti T. Fufa MD

Purpose

Disparities continue to impact patient care within orthopedics. Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are extremely common, with variability in surgical indications allowing for potential treatment disparities. The study sought to determine whether (1) insurance status and (2) geographic socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with surgeon treatment recommendation for dorsally angulated DRF.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used institutional data from 2016 to 2021 to assess associations between patient demographics and socioeconomic variables of interest, including geographic socioeconomic disadvantage (Area Deprivation Index), insurance status, and likelihood of operative recommendation. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders including fracture severity based on degree of dorsal angulation (mild, ≥0° and ≤10°; moderate, >10° and <20°; severe ≥20°), radial inclination, ulnar variance, presence of an ulnar styloid fracture, sex, age, and Elixhauser Comorbidity score (α = 0.05).

Results

In total, 891 patients were included, with a mean age of 55 years (range 18–62), 78% women (n = 699), and 79.4% White non-Hispanic (n = 707), 2.9% Black non-Hispanic (n = 26), 6.9% Hispanic (n = 61), and 10.9% Other (n = 97). In total, 31% (n=280) of all patients presented with mild DRF, 29% (n = 258) moderate, and 40% (n = 353) severe. Overall, 77% (n = 688) of patients were recommended surgery, and 74% (n = 660) underwent operative management. Public health insurance was associated with lower likelihood of recommendation for surgery. There was no significant difference in treatment recommendation based on Area Deprivation Index.

Conclusions

Public health insurance was found to be significantly associated with lower likelihood of recommendation for DRF surgery, even after controlling for fracture severity and individual-level confounding variables. This suggests variability in DRF management based on individual patient factors.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic III
目的:差异继续影响骨科患者护理。桡骨远端骨折(DRFs)非常常见,手术指征的差异允许潜在的治疗差异。该研究试图确定(1)保险状况和(2)地理社会经济劣势是否与外科医生对背侧成角DRF的治疗建议有关。方法本回顾性队列研究使用2016年至2021年的机构数据来评估患者人口统计学与感兴趣的社会经济变量之间的关系,包括地理社会经济劣势(区域剥夺指数)、保险状况和推荐手术的可能性。多变量logistic回归校正了潜在的混杂因素,包括骨折严重程度,基于背角程度(轻度,≥0°和≤10°;中度,>;10°和<;20°;严重≥20°)、桡骨倾角、尺侧变异、尺茎样骨骨折、性别、年龄和Elixhauser合并症评分(α = 0.05)。结果共纳入891例患者,平均年龄55岁(18-62岁),78%为女性(n = 699), 79.4%为非西班牙裔白人(n = 707), 2.9%为非西班牙裔黑人(n = 26), 6.9%为西班牙裔(n = 61), 10.9%为其他(n = 97)。总的来说,31% (n=280)的患者表现为轻度DRF, 29% (n= 258)为中度DRF, 40% (n= 353)为重度DRF。总体而言,77% (n = 688)的患者推荐手术治疗,74% (n = 660)的患者接受手术治疗。公共健康保险与推荐手术的可能性较低相关。基于面积剥夺指数的治疗推荐无显著性差异。结论公共健康保险与推荐DRF手术的可能性降低显著相关,即使在控制骨折严重程度和个体水平混杂变量后也是如此。这表明DRF的管理因患者个体因素而异。研究类型/证据水平预后
{"title":"Association Between Insurance Status and Recommendation for Surgery for Distal Radius Fractures","authors":"Emma T. Smolev MD ,&nbsp;Rafa Rahman MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Amy Z. Lu BS ,&nbsp;Jarred Chow BS ,&nbsp;Rosie McColgan MD ,&nbsp;Jeremy Abolade MD ,&nbsp;Sanjum Singh MD ,&nbsp;Isabel Wolfe MD ,&nbsp;Troy B. Amen MD, MBA ,&nbsp;Duretti T. Fufa MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100890","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100890","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Disparities continue to impact patient care within orthopedics. Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are extremely common, with variability in surgical indications allowing for potential treatment disparities. The study sought to determine whether (1) insurance status and (2) geographic socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with surgeon treatment recommendation for dorsally angulated DRF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective cohort study used institutional data from 2016 to 2021 to assess associations between patient demographics and socioeconomic variables of interest, including geographic socioeconomic disadvantage (Area Deprivation Index), insurance status, and likelihood of operative recommendation. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders including fracture severity based on degree of dorsal angulation (mild, ≥0° and ≤10°; moderate, &gt;10° and &lt;20°; severe ≥20°), radial inclination, ulnar variance, presence of an ulnar styloid fracture, sex, age, and Elixhauser Comorbidity score (α = 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In total, 891 patients were included, with a mean age of 55 years (range 18–62), 78% women (n = 699), and 79.4% White non-Hispanic (n = 707), 2.9% Black non-Hispanic (n = 26), 6.9% Hispanic (n = 61), and 10.9% Other (n = 97). In total, 31% (n=280) of all patients presented with mild DRF, 29% (n = 258) moderate, and 40% (n = 353) severe. Overall, 77% (n = 688) of patients were recommended surgery, and 74% (n = 660) underwent operative management. Public health insurance was associated with lower likelihood of recommendation for surgery. There was no significant difference in treatment recommendation based on Area Deprivation Index.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Public health insurance was found to be significantly associated with lower likelihood of recommendation for DRF surgery, even after controlling for fracture severity and individual-level confounding variables. This suggests variability in DRF management based on individual patient factors.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Prognostic III</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100890"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145576949","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comment on “A Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Platforms in the Utility of Answering Frequently Asked Questions About Carpal Tunnel Syndrome” 评《人工智能平台在解答腕管综合征常见问题的效用比较》
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-20 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100884
Amnuay Kleebayoon PhD , Viroj Wiwanitkit MD
{"title":"Comment on “A Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Platforms in the Utility of Answering Frequently Asked Questions About Carpal Tunnel Syndrome”","authors":"Amnuay Kleebayoon PhD ,&nbsp;Viroj Wiwanitkit MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100884","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100884","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100884"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145576947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adults Closed Distal Radial Fractures: Current Concepts in Treatment Selection and Complication Prevention 成人闭合性桡骨远端骨折:治疗选择和并发症预防的最新概念
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100886
Sang Anh Nguyen MD, MSc , Anh Hoang Dang MD, PhD , Doanh Quoc Tran MD, PhD

Purpose

Closed distal radial fractures (DRFs) are among the most common adult fractures with high socioeconomic impact. Clinical decision-making remains challenging, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), because of the heterogeneous nature of evidence and resource constraints. This study aimed to develop a risk-stratified framework for treatment selection and the prevention of complications.

Methods

A structured literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase databases from January 2015 to August 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, systematic reviews, and guidelines addressing closed DRF management in adults. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts.

Results

Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria: three randomized controlled trials, five systematic reviews/meta-analyses, three cohort studies, two cadaveric/technical imaging studies, one guideline summary, and one narrative review. Radiographic thresholds of radial shortening >3 mm, dorsal tilt >10°, and intra-articular step-off >2 mm were supported as surgical indications in younger or high-demand adults, but not consistently in older low-demand patients. Instability predictors, such as Lafontaine criteria, were cited frequently; however, no single factor reliably predicted redisplacement. Volar locking plate (VLP) fixation yielded earlier functional recovery in unstable or high-demand patients, but long-term outcomes converged across techniques. The SAFE-VLP checklist (safe plate position, appropriate screw length, fixation stability, and early rehabilitation) emerged as a practical tool to reduce complications related to tendon, nerve, and complex regional pain. For LMICs, pragmatic pathways emphasize high-quality casting for low-demand elderly patients, percutaneous pinning as a cost effective alternative for moderate instability, and day-surgery VLP for unstable or working-age patients, supported by tele-rehabilitation strategies.

Conclusions

The management of closed DRFs should integrate radiographic criteria, instability predictors, functional demand, and health care context, rather than relying solely on radiographs for decision-making. This review provides a risk-stratified algorithm, a validated safety checklist, and an LMIC-adapted pathway to optimize outcomes and reduce complications.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic V.
闭合性桡骨远端骨折(DRFs)是最常见的成人骨折之一,具有很高的社会经济影响。由于证据的异质性和资源限制,临床决策仍然具有挑战性,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。本研究旨在为治疗选择和并发症预防建立一个风险分层框架。方法于2015年1月~ 2025年8月在Pubmed、Scopus和Embase数据库中进行结构化文献检索。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验、队列研究、系统评价和成人DRF闭合性管理指南。两位审稿人独立筛选标题、摘要和全文。结果15项研究符合纳入标准:3项随机对照试验、5项系统综述/荟萃分析、3项队列研究、2项尸体/技术成像研究、1项指南总结和1项叙述性综述。放射学阈值桡骨缩短3毫米,背侧倾斜10°,关节内偏移2毫米作为手术指征在年轻或高需求成人中得到支持,但在老年低需求患者中不一致。不稳定预测指标,如拉方丹标准,被频繁引用;然而,没有单一因素可以可靠地预测再移位。掌侧锁定钢板(VLP)固定可以在不稳定或高需求患者中早期实现功能恢复,但各种技术的长期结果趋同。safe - vlp检查表(安全的钢板位置、合适的螺钉长度、固定稳定性和早期康复)成为减少肌腱、神经和复杂局部疼痛相关并发症的实用工具。对于中低收入国家,务实的途径强调对低需求老年患者的高质量铸造,对中度不稳定患者的经皮钉固定作为经济有效的替代方案,以及对不稳定或工作年龄患者的日间手术VLP,并支持远程康复策略。结论闭合性drf的管理应结合影像学标准、不稳定性预测指标、功能需求和卫生保健背景,而不是仅仅依靠影像学来决策。本综述提供了一种风险分层算法、一份经过验证的安全检查表和一种适应lmic的途径,以优化结果并减少并发症。研究类型/证据水平
{"title":"Adults Closed Distal Radial Fractures: Current Concepts in Treatment Selection and Complication Prevention","authors":"Sang Anh Nguyen MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Anh Hoang Dang MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Doanh Quoc Tran MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100886","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100886","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Closed distal radial fractures (DRFs) are among the most common adult fractures with high socioeconomic impact. Clinical decision-making remains challenging, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), because of the heterogeneous nature of evidence and resource constraints. This study aimed to develop a risk-stratified framework for treatment selection and the prevention of complications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A structured literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase databases from January 2015 to August 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, systematic reviews, and guidelines addressing closed DRF management in adults. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria: three randomized controlled trials, five systematic reviews/meta-analyses, three cohort studies, two cadaveric/technical imaging studies, one guideline summary, and one narrative review. Radiographic thresholds of radial shortening &gt;3 mm, dorsal tilt &gt;10°, and intra-articular step-off &gt;2 mm were supported as surgical indications in younger or high-demand adults, but not consistently in older low-demand patients. Instability predictors, such as Lafontaine criteria, were cited frequently; however, no single factor reliably predicted redisplacement. Volar locking plate (VLP) fixation yielded earlier functional recovery in unstable or high-demand patients, but long-term outcomes converged across techniques. The SAFE-VLP checklist (safe plate position, appropriate screw length, fixation stability, and early rehabilitation) emerged as a practical tool to reduce complications related to tendon, nerve, and complex regional pain. For LMICs, pragmatic pathways emphasize high-quality casting for low-demand elderly patients, percutaneous pinning as a cost effective alternative for moderate instability, and day-surgery VLP for unstable or working-age patients, supported by tele-rehabilitation strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The management of closed DRFs should integrate radiographic criteria, instability predictors, functional demand, and health care context, rather than relying solely on radiographs for decision-making. This review provides a risk-stratified algorithm, a validated safety checklist, and an LMIC-adapted pathway to optimize outcomes and reduce complications.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic V.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100886"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145526463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Regarding “Dynamic Tenodesis Technique for Ulnar Drift With Extensor Tendon Subluxation due to Rheumatoid Arthritis” by Oda et al 关于Oda等人的“类风湿关节炎所致尺侧漂移伴伸肌腱半脱位的动态肌腱固定术”
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100883
Parth Aphale PhD , Himanshu Shekhar BHMS , Shashank Dokania BHMS
{"title":"Regarding “Dynamic Tenodesis Technique for Ulnar Drift With Extensor Tendon Subluxation due to Rheumatoid Arthritis” by Oda et al","authors":"Parth Aphale PhD ,&nbsp;Himanshu Shekhar BHMS ,&nbsp;Shashank Dokania BHMS","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100883","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100883","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100883"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145526464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Trends in Epidemiology and Reimbursement for Nerve Exploration and Reconstruction After Brachial Plexus Injury in the United States From 2009 to 2019 2009年至2019年美国臂丛神经损伤后神经探查和重建的流行病学趋势和报销
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100829
Thomas J. McQuillan MD , Kevin Heo MD , Olivia Jagiella-Lodise BS , Joseph G. Monir MD , Eric R. Wagner MD , Nicole A. Zelenski MD

Purpose

Brachial plexus injury (BPI) is an uncommon peripheral nerve disorder with a multitude of treatments. Given the relative rarity of this condition, it is difficult to estimate the volume of primary and secondary reconstructive procedures in the United States, as well as demographic and geographic trends in treatment.

Methods

The study used a large administrative commercial insurance claims database to estimate the total volume of procedures associated with a diagnosis of BPI from the years 2009 to 2019. Unique Current Procedural Terminology codes were tabulated among beneficiaries with a known diagnosis of BPI and stratified by key variables including age, sex, and geographic region to assess for trends in diagnosis and management. Reimbursement data for specific Current Procedural Terminology codes were adjusted for inflation and evaluated over the follow-up period.

Results

The incidence rate of nerve procedures for BPI increased over the study period from 1.26 to 1.91 procedures per 100,000 patient-years, as did the incidence rate of unique patients with BPI treated with nerve procedures, from 0.76 to 1.18. More procedures were performed in the age group 18–34 years (35.1%) and the South geographic region (40.6%). The most common codes included brachial plexus neuroplasty (Current Procedural Terminology codes 64713 and 64861; 64% of total). Reimbursement increased for codes related to brachial plexus neuroplasty over the interval of +26% and decreased for both neuroplasty of peripheral nerves (−23.9%) and nerve transfers (−39.7%).

Conclusions

The volume of procedures performed for BPI continues to increase with the dissemination of surgical techniques and knowledge. Relative increases in the older adult patient population, among females, and in the South necessitate a patient-specific approach given that historically most treatment has been provided to young, male patients. Declining reimbursement for certain codes necessitates continued advocacy given the complexity of surgery and technical advances in the field.

Type of study/level of evidence

Differential diagnosis/symptom prevalence IV.
目的臂丛神经损伤(brachial plexus injury, BPI)是一种少见的周围神经疾病,治疗方法多种多样。鉴于这种情况的相对罕见性,很难估计美国初级和二级重建手术的数量,以及治疗的人口和地理趋势。方法:本研究使用一个大型行政商业保险索赔数据库来估计2009年至2019年与BPI诊断相关的程序总量。将已知诊断为BPI的受益人的独特现行程序术语代码制成表格,并按年龄、性别和地理区域等关键变量分层,以评估诊断和管理的趋势。具体现行程序术语代码的偿还数据已根据通货膨胀进行了调整,并在后续期间进行了评价。结果在研究期间,神经手术治疗BPI的发生率从每10万患者年1.26例增加到1.91例,接受神经手术治疗的独特BPI患者的发病率也从0.76例增加到1.18例。18-34岁年龄组(35.1%)和南部地理区域(40.6%)的手术较多。最常见的编码包括臂丛神经成形术(现行程序术语编码64713和64861;占总数的64%)。臂丛神经成形术相关代码的报销增加了+26%,周围神经成形术和神经转移的报销都减少了- 23.9%和- 39.7%。结论随着手术技术和知识的普及,BPI手术数量不断增加。老年患者人口、女性和南方的相对增加需要针对患者的方法,因为历史上大多数治疗都是为年轻的男性患者提供的。由于手术的复杂性和该领域的技术进步,某些代码的报销减少需要继续宣传。研究类型/证据水平鉴别诊断/症状患病率
{"title":"Trends in Epidemiology and Reimbursement for Nerve Exploration and Reconstruction After Brachial Plexus Injury in the United States From 2009 to 2019","authors":"Thomas J. McQuillan MD ,&nbsp;Kevin Heo MD ,&nbsp;Olivia Jagiella-Lodise BS ,&nbsp;Joseph G. Monir MD ,&nbsp;Eric R. Wagner MD ,&nbsp;Nicole A. Zelenski MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100829","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100829","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Brachial plexus injury (BPI) is an uncommon peripheral nerve disorder with a multitude of treatments. Given the relative rarity of this condition, it is difficult to estimate the volume of primary and secondary reconstructive procedures in the United States, as well as demographic and geographic trends in treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study used a large administrative commercial insurance claims database to estimate the total volume of procedures associated with a diagnosis of BPI from the years 2009 to 2019. Unique Current Procedural Terminology codes were tabulated among beneficiaries with a known diagnosis of BPI and stratified by key variables including age, sex, and geographic region to assess for trends in diagnosis and management. Reimbursement data for specific Current Procedural Terminology codes were adjusted for inflation and evaluated over the follow-up period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The incidence rate of nerve procedures for BPI increased over the study period from 1.26 to 1.91 procedures per 100,000 patient-years, as did the incidence rate of unique patients with BPI treated with nerve procedures, from 0.76 to 1.18. More procedures were performed in the age group 18–34 years (35.1%) and the South geographic region (40.6%). The most common codes included brachial plexus neuroplasty (Current Procedural Terminology codes 64713 and 64861; 64% of total). Reimbursement increased for codes related to brachial plexus neuroplasty over the interval of +26% and decreased for both neuroplasty of peripheral nerves (−23.9%) and nerve transfers (−39.7%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The volume of procedures performed for BPI continues to increase with the dissemination of surgical techniques and knowledge. Relative increases in the older adult patient population, among females, and in the South necessitate a patient-specific approach given that historically most treatment has been provided to young, male patients. Declining reimbursement for certain codes necessitates continued advocacy given the complexity of surgery and technical advances in the field.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Differential diagnosis/symptom prevalence IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100829"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145526517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anatomic Structures at Risk With Antegrade Intramedullary Fixation of the First Metacarpal Using Three Start Points: Is There A Safe Zone? 使用三个起始点顺行髓内固定第一掌骨会危及解剖结构:是否存在安全区域?
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100850
Mason H. Adams DO , Thomas B. Lynch MD , Daniel D. Homeier MD , David J. Wilson MD , Jantz J. Arbon MD , Taylor J. Bates MD

Purpose

Intramedullary fixation of extraarticular first metacarpal fractures using a percutaneous technique may risk injury to important anatomic structures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate potential safe zones for antegrade implant entry of the first metacarpal and describe the anatomical structures at risk.

Methods

Ten cadaveric hands were used to evaluate three start points located at the first metacarpal base: volar-radial, dorsal-radial, and dorsal-ulnar. A fluoroscopic imaging system was used to guide percutaneous placement of 0.8 mm × 100 mm guidewires and 2.0 mm diameter screws. After screw placement the guidewires were left in place and soft tissues were dissected to identify at risk anatomic structures.

Results

The identified structures at risk were the radial artery, superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN), extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon, abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon, and extensor pollicis brevis (EPB) tendon. A volar-radial start point risks injury to the APL tendon (8.3 ± 5.4 mm). A dorsal-radial start point risks injury to the SBRN (2.2 ± 3.4 mm), APL (1.4 ± 1.8 mm), and EPB (1.2 ± 2.1 mm) tendons. A dorsal-ulnar start point risks injury to the SBRN (5 ± 4.2 mm), radial artery (3.5 ± 3.1 mm), and EPL tendon (3.5 ± 2.4 mm).

Conclusions

Dorsal-radial and dorsal-ulnar start points risk injuring critical anatomic structures: radial artery, SBRN, EPL, APL, and EPB. A volar-radial start point may risk injury to the APL tendon but presents the lowest risk of injury to neurovascular structures.

Clinical relevance

This study identifies key anatomic structures at risk associated with three common percutaneous entry points. The volar-radial start point demonstrated the lowest risk to neurovascular structures and may represent a safe approach for percutaneous intramedullary fixation.
目的经皮髓内固定第一掌骨关节外骨折有损伤重要解剖结构的危险。本研究的目的是评估第一掌骨顺行植入的潜在安全区域,并描述存在风险的解剖结构。方法用10只尸体手评价位于第一掌骨基部的三个起始点:掌桡、桡背、尺背。使用透视成像系统引导经皮放置0.8 mm × 100 mm导丝和2.0 mm直径的螺钉。螺钉置入后,将导丝留在原位,解剖软组织以确定有危险的解剖结构。结果确定的危险结构为桡动脉、桡神经浅支(SBRN)、拇长伸肌腱(EPL)、拇长外展肌腱(APL)和拇短伸肌腱(EPB)。掌桡起始点有损伤APL肌腱的风险(8.3±5.4 mm)。背桡起始点有损伤SBRN(2.2±3.4 mm)、APL(1.4±1.8 mm)和EPB(1.2±2.1 mm)肌腱的风险。背尺起始点有损伤SBRN(5±4.2 mm)、桡动脉(3.5±3.1 mm)和EPL肌腱(3.5±2.4 mm)的风险。结论背桡和背尺起始点有损伤关键解剖结构的风险:桡动脉、SBRN、EPL、APL和EPB。掌桡起始点可能有损伤APL肌腱的风险,但对神经血管结构的损伤风险最低。临床相关性本研究确定了与三个常见经皮穿刺点相关的关键解剖结构的危险。掌侧桡侧起始点对神经血管结构的风险最低,可能是经皮髓内固定的安全方法。
{"title":"Anatomic Structures at Risk With Antegrade Intramedullary Fixation of the First Metacarpal Using Three Start Points: Is There A Safe Zone?","authors":"Mason H. Adams DO ,&nbsp;Thomas B. Lynch MD ,&nbsp;Daniel D. Homeier MD ,&nbsp;David J. Wilson MD ,&nbsp;Jantz J. Arbon MD ,&nbsp;Taylor J. Bates MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100850","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100850","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Intramedullary fixation of extraarticular first metacarpal fractures using a percutaneous technique may risk injury to important anatomic structures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate potential safe zones for antegrade implant entry of the first metacarpal and describe the anatomical structures at risk.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ten cadaveric hands were used to evaluate three start points located at the first metacarpal base: volar-radial, dorsal-radial, and dorsal-ulnar. A fluoroscopic imaging system was used to guide percutaneous placement of 0.8 mm × 100 mm guidewires and 2.0 mm diameter screws. After screw placement the guidewires were left in place and soft tissues were dissected to identify at risk anatomic structures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The identified structures at risk were the radial artery, superficial branch of the radial nerve (SBRN), extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon, abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon, and extensor pollicis brevis (EPB) tendon. A volar-radial start point risks injury to the APL tendon (8.3 ± 5.4 mm). A dorsal-radial start point risks injury to the SBRN (2.2 ± 3.4 mm), APL (1.4 ± 1.8 mm), and EPB (1.2 ± 2.1 mm) tendons. A dorsal-ulnar start point risks injury to the SBRN (5 ± 4.2 mm), radial artery (3.5 ± 3.1 mm), and EPL tendon (3.5 ± 2.4 mm).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Dorsal-radial and dorsal-ulnar start points risk injuring critical anatomic structures: radial artery, SBRN, EPL, APL, and EPB. A volar-radial start point may risk injury to the APL tendon but presents the lowest risk of injury to neurovascular structures.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>This study identifies key anatomic structures at risk associated with three common percutaneous entry points. The volar-radial start point demonstrated the lowest risk to neurovascular structures and may represent a safe approach for percutaneous intramedullary fixation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100850"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145526465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nerve Transfer for Restoration of Ulnar Fingers Flexion Through Pronator Teres Motor Branch: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study 经旋前圆肌运动支神经移植修复尺指屈曲的尸体可行性研究
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100844
Paolo Titolo MD , Alessandro Crosio MD, PhD , Andrea Fanecco MD , Erica Cavalli MD , Francesca Vincitorio MD , Julien Teodori MD , Giulia Colzani MD , Nathalie Bini MD , Mario Ronga MD , Michele Rosario Colonna MD, PhD , Bruno Battiston MD, PhD , Davide Ciclamini MD

Purpose

Injury to the ulnar nerve above the elbow or other conditions such as brachial plexus injury or cervical spinal cord injury can also affect the extrinsic finger flexors. Numerous techniques have been described to treat this problem, but no specific nerve transfer has been proposed.

Methods

Here, we describe the transfer of the motor branch of the pronator teres (PT) to reinnervate flexor digitorum profundi of the ulnar nerve. Eleven fresh frozen upper limbs were used. The anatomical characteristics of the branches to the flexor digitorum profundus and PT were recorded.

Results

In all cases, the superficial branch of the PT resulted as the longest between the two and, therefore, was used as a donor. It was passed under the flexor pronator muscles to reach the ulnar nerve. The recipient motor branch was dissected proximally, and a direct nerve suture was made between the two stumps.

Conclusions

In all specimens, a direct tension free neurorrhaphy was possible, located close to the target muscle.

Clinical relevance

This specific procedure can be suggested in cases where the hand is partially involved to allow patients to regain or strengthen fingers flexion. Direct clinical application should support and confirm this novel procedure.
目的肘部以上尺神经损伤或其他情况如臂丛损伤或颈脊髓损伤也可影响外源性指屈肌。许多技术已经被描述来治疗这个问题,但没有特定的神经转移被提出。方法将旋前圆肌运动支转移到尺神经的指深屈肌。使用11条新鲜冷冻上肢。记录了指深屈肌分支和指深屈肌分支的解剖特征。结果所有病例中,PT浅表分支均为两者之间最长的分支,因此均被用作供肌。它从屈肌旋前肌下穿过到达尺神经。近端切除受体运动支,两残端间直接神经缝合。结论所有标本均可在靠近靶肌处进行直接无张力神经吻合。临床相关性对于手部分受累的病例,可以建议采用这种特殊的手术,以使患者恢复或加强手指屈曲。直接的临床应用应该支持和证实这种新方法。
{"title":"Nerve Transfer for Restoration of Ulnar Fingers Flexion Through Pronator Teres Motor Branch: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study","authors":"Paolo Titolo MD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Crosio MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Andrea Fanecco MD ,&nbsp;Erica Cavalli MD ,&nbsp;Francesca Vincitorio MD ,&nbsp;Julien Teodori MD ,&nbsp;Giulia Colzani MD ,&nbsp;Nathalie Bini MD ,&nbsp;Mario Ronga MD ,&nbsp;Michele Rosario Colonna MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bruno Battiston MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Davide Ciclamini MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100844","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100844","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Injury to the ulnar nerve above the elbow or other conditions such as brachial plexus injury or cervical spinal cord injury can also affect the extrinsic finger flexors. Numerous techniques have been described to treat this problem, but no specific nerve transfer has been proposed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Here, we describe the transfer of the motor branch of the pronator teres (PT) to reinnervate flexor digitorum profundi of the ulnar nerve. Eleven fresh frozen upper limbs were used. The anatomical characteristics of the branches to the flexor digitorum profundus and PT were recorded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In all cases, the superficial branch of the PT resulted as the longest between the two and, therefore, was used as a donor. It was passed under the flexor pronator muscles to reach the ulnar nerve. The recipient motor branch was dissected proximally, and a direct nerve suture was made between the two stumps.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In all specimens, a direct tension free neurorrhaphy was possible, located close to the target muscle.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>This specific procedure can be suggested in cases where the hand is partially involved to allow patients to regain or strengthen fingers flexion. Direct clinical application should support and confirm this novel procedure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100844"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145420244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Carpal Tunnel Release: A Four-Specialty Comparison Demonstrating Equal Clinical and Economic Efficacy 腕管松解术:四专科对比显示同等的临床和经济效果
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100863
Andy M. Liu BS , Vikranth Mirle MD , Cody Lee MD , Jennifer Moriatis Wolf MD, PhD , Jason Strelzow MD

Purpose

Carpal tunnel release (CTR), the most common hand surgery procedure in the United States, is routinely performed by orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, plastic surgeons, and general surgeons. There is limited literature comparing clinical costs and research utilization among specialties. This study sought to determine treatment utilization, variations in cases, and cost trends among orthopedic, plastic, general, and neurosurgeons.

Methods

A national insurance database was queried for patients who underwent open or endoscopic CTR between the years 2007 and 2022. Four cohorts based on provider specialty, orthopedic, plastic, general, and neurosurgery, were matched using the following factors: age, sex, diabetes, obesity, tobacco use, location of procedure, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Average cost by specialty was then calculated and compared. Rates of therapy within 3 months after surgery and EMG and nerve conduction velocity studies within 3 months before the procedure were also compared.

Results

The matched cohorts consisted of 13,107 patients each. Plastic surgeons and neurosurgeons had the highest average cost ($2,923.29 and $2,922.58), followed by orthopedic surgeons ($2,765.95), with general surgeons having the lowest cost ($2,607.02). Rates of preoperative EMG and nerve conduction studies were highest with neurosurgeons (28.5%), followed by orthopedics and plastics (22.6% and 23.4%, respectively), with general surgeons ordering the fewest (19.7%). For complications, general surgeons and neurosurgeons had a small but statistically higher infection rate (0.8%, 0.7% respectively) compared with orthopedic and plastic surgeons (0.5%, 0.5%).

Conclusions

The current study demonstrates that overall orthopedic, plastic, neurosurgery, and general surgeons perform CTRs with similar overall costs and with similar postoperative complications.

Type of study/level of evidence

Economic/decision analysis III.
腕管松解术(CTR)是美国最常见的手部手术,骨科医生、神经外科医生、整形外科医生和普通外科医生都经常进行。比较各专科的临床费用和研究利用的文献有限。本研究旨在确定骨科、整形外科、普通外科和神经外科的治疗利用率、病例变化和费用趋势。方法在国家保险数据库中查询2007年至2022年间接受开放式或内窥镜CTR的患者。四个基于提供者专业的队列,骨科、整形、普通和神经外科,使用以下因素进行匹配:年龄、性别、糖尿病、肥胖、吸烟、手术地点和Elixhauser合并症指数。然后计算和比较各专业的平均成本。手术后3个月内的治疗率和手术前3个月内的肌电图和神经传导速度研究也进行了比较。结果匹配队列包括13107例患者。整形外科医生和神经外科医生的平均费用最高(分别为2923.29美元和2922.58美元),其次是整形外科医生(2765.95美元),普通外科医生的费用最低(2607.02美元)。神经外科医生的术前肌电图和神经传导检查率最高(28.5%),其次是骨科和整形外科(分别为22.6%和23.4%),普通外科医生的订货量最少(19.7%)。在并发症方面,普通外科医生和神经外科医生的感染率(分别为0.8%和0.7%)略高于骨科和整形外科医生(分别为0.5%和0.5%)。目前的研究表明,骨科、整形外科、神经外科和普通外科医生进行的CTRs的总成本和术后并发症相似。研究类型/证据水平经济/决策分析
{"title":"Carpal Tunnel Release: A Four-Specialty Comparison Demonstrating Equal Clinical and Economic Efficacy","authors":"Andy M. Liu BS ,&nbsp;Vikranth Mirle MD ,&nbsp;Cody Lee MD ,&nbsp;Jennifer Moriatis Wolf MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Jason Strelzow MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100863","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100863","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Carpal tunnel release (CTR), the most common hand surgery procedure in the United States, is routinely performed by orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, plastic surgeons, and general surgeons. There is limited literature comparing clinical costs and research utilization among specialties. This study sought to determine treatment utilization, variations in cases, and cost trends among orthopedic, plastic, general, and neurosurgeons.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A national insurance database was queried for patients who underwent open or endoscopic CTR between the years 2007 and 2022. Four cohorts based on provider specialty, orthopedic, plastic, general, and neurosurgery, were matched using the following factors: age, sex, diabetes, obesity, tobacco use, location of procedure, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Average cost by specialty was then calculated and compared. Rates of therapy within 3 months after surgery and EMG and nerve conduction velocity studies within 3 months before the procedure were also compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The matched cohorts consisted of 13,107 patients each. Plastic surgeons and neurosurgeons had the highest average cost ($2,923.29 and $2,922.58), followed by orthopedic surgeons ($2,765.95), with general surgeons having the lowest cost ($2,607.02). Rates of preoperative EMG and nerve conduction studies were highest with neurosurgeons (28.5%), followed by orthopedics and plastics (22.6% and 23.4%, respectively), with general surgeons ordering the fewest (19.7%). For complications, general surgeons and neurosurgeons had a small but statistically higher infection rate (0.8%, 0.7% respectively) compared with orthopedic and plastic surgeons (0.5%, 0.5%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The current study demonstrates that overall orthopedic, plastic, neurosurgery, and general surgeons perform CTRs with similar overall costs and with similar postoperative complications.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Economic/decision analysis III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100863"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145420299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Training Tomorrow’s Hand Surgeons: Clinical, Leadership, and Structural Trends in Fellowship Education 培训未来的手外科医生:奖学金教育的临床、领导和结构趋势
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100871
Ogonna N. Nnamani Silva MD , Aaron I. Dadzie BS , Chinenye Ogbonnah BA , Lydia A. Helliwell MD, MMSc , Abhiram R. Bhashyam MD, PhD , Catherine M. Curtin MD , Tamara D. Rozental MD , Krystle R. Tuaño MD

Purpose

Hand surgery fellowships include trainees from orthopedic, plastic, and general surgery. These pathways present an opportunity to examine variations in graduate medical education structures, such as program size, sponsoring department, and leadership composition. Limited research exists on the characteristics of these programs. The purpose of this study is to assess the structural and leadership characteristics of the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited hand surgery fellowships in the United States. We hypothesized that characteristics (ie, faculty-to-fellow ratios and case volume) vary by specialty sponsorship. Leadership, although shaped by merit-based criteria, faces challenges in achieving broader demographic diversity.

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis of 95 US hand surgery fellowship programs was conducted in 2025. Program characteristics were compared by region and specialty sponsorship.

Results

Most programs were orthopedic-sponsored (n = 74, 77.9%), followed by plastic surgery (n = 19, 20.0%) and general surgery (n = 2, 2.11%). Programs averaged 2.22 fellows (SD = 1.35), with a faculty-to-fellow ratio of 3.98 (SD = 2.01) and an annual case volume of 846 per fellow (SD = 332). Orthopedic-sponsored programs had more fellows on average, a lower faculty-to-fellow ratio, and were less open to general surgery applicants compared to plastic surgery-sponsored programs. No notable regional differences were found in these characteristics. Program directors were predominantly men (n = 81, 85.3%) and orthopedic-trained (n = 70, 73.7%).

Conclusions

Hand surgery fellowships show consistent structural features, with notable differences between orthopedic- and plastic surgery-sponsored programs in enrollment, faculty-to-fellow ratios, and openness to general surgery applicants. Women leadership underrepresentation warrants further evaluation.

Type of study/level of evidence

Cross-sectional descriptive study, level IV.
目的手外科奖学金包括来自骨科、整形外科和普通外科的学员。这些途径提供了一个机会来检查研究生医学教育结构的变化,如项目规模、资助部门和领导组成。对这些节目的特点研究有限。本研究的目的是评估美国研究生医学教育认证委员会认可的手外科奖学金的结构和领导特征。我们假设特征(即教员与研究员的比例和病例量)因专业赞助而异。领导层虽然是由择优标准塑造的,但在实现更广泛的人口多样性方面面临着挑战。方法对2025年美国95个手外科奖学金项目进行横断面分析。按地区和专业赞助比较项目特点。结果以骨科为主(n = 74, 77.9%),其次是整形外科(n = 19, 20.0%)和普外科(n = 2, 2.11%)。项目平均为2.22名研究员(SD = 1.35),教师与研究员的比率为3.98 (SD = 2.01),每位研究员每年的病例量为846例(SD = 332)。与整形外科资助的项目相比,骨科资助的项目平均有更多的研究员,教师与研究员的比例较低,并且对普通外科申请者的开放程度较低。在这些特征上没有发现显著的区域差异。项目主管主要是男性(n = 81, 85.3%)和受过骨科训练的男性(n = 70, 73.7%)。结论:骨科和整形外科奖学金项目在招生、教师与研究员的比例以及对普通外科申请者的开放程度方面存在显著差异,具有一致的结构特征。妇女领导人数不足值得进一步评价。研究类型/证据水平横断面描述性研究,IV级。
{"title":"Training Tomorrow’s Hand Surgeons: Clinical, Leadership, and Structural Trends in Fellowship Education","authors":"Ogonna N. Nnamani Silva MD ,&nbsp;Aaron I. Dadzie BS ,&nbsp;Chinenye Ogbonnah BA ,&nbsp;Lydia A. Helliwell MD, MMSc ,&nbsp;Abhiram R. Bhashyam MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Catherine M. Curtin MD ,&nbsp;Tamara D. Rozental MD ,&nbsp;Krystle R. Tuaño MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100871","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100871","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Hand surgery fellowships include trainees from orthopedic, plastic, and general surgery. These pathways present an opportunity to examine variations in graduate medical education structures, such as program size, sponsoring department, and leadership composition. Limited research exists on the characteristics of these programs. The purpose of this study is to assess the structural and leadership characteristics of the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited hand surgery fellowships in the United States. We hypothesized that characteristics (ie, faculty-to-fellow ratios and case volume) vary by specialty sponsorship. Leadership, although shaped by merit-based criteria, faces challenges in achieving broader demographic diversity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional analysis of 95 US hand surgery fellowship programs was conducted in 2025. Program characteristics were compared by region and specialty sponsorship.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most programs were orthopedic-sponsored (n = 74, 77.9%), followed by plastic surgery (n = 19, 20.0%) and general surgery (n = 2, 2.11%). Programs averaged 2.22 fellows (SD = 1.35), with a faculty-to-fellow ratio of 3.98 (SD = 2.01) and an annual case volume of 846 per fellow (SD = 332). Orthopedic-sponsored programs had more fellows on average, a lower faculty-to-fellow ratio, and were less open to general surgery applicants compared to plastic surgery-sponsored programs. No notable regional differences were found in these characteristics. Program directors were predominantly men (n = 81, 85.3%) and orthopedic-trained (n = 70, 73.7%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Hand surgery fellowships show consistent structural features, with notable differences between orthopedic- and plastic surgery-sponsored programs in enrollment, faculty-to-fellow ratios, and openness to general surgery applicants. Women leadership underrepresentation warrants further evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Cross-sectional descriptive study, level IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100871"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145420375","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Concordance Between Subjective Sleep and PSQI/ISI in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients: A Comparative Study Before and After Surgery 腕管综合征患者术前、术后主观睡眠与PSQI/ISI的一致性比较研究
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100870
Sang Anh Nguyen MD, MSc , Doanh Quoc Tran MD, PhD

Purpose

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is frequently associated with sleep disturbances that considerably impair quality of life. Most studies have focused on either subjective sleep or standardized patient-reported (SPR) measures, but the concordance between these measures before and after surgery remains unclear. We aimed to determine the rates of concordance and discordance, along with the associated factors, ultimately proposing strategies to enhance the assessment process and postoperative care for these patients.

Methods

We conducted a single-center observational study including 104 adult CTS patients who underwent carpal tunnel release, divided into retrospective (n = 71) and prospective (n = 33) cohorts. Subjective sleep quality was assessed by patient self-report, whereas SPR included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Assessments were performed before surgery and at 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery. Concordance between subjective and SPR results was determined at each time point.

Results

Before surgery, 100% of patients reported poor sleep, with all having PSQI > 5 and ISI > 7 (full concordance). After surgery, both subjective and SPR sleep quality improved significantly. At 12 months, 95.77% of patients self-reported good sleep; 95.77% had PSQI ≤ 5, and 91.55% had ISI ≤ 7. Concordance between subjective and SPR assessments increased over time, but a minority of patients continued to exhibit discordance, with self-perceived improvement preceding SPR normalization in some cases. Strong positive correlations were found between PSQI and ISI at all time points.

Conclusions

Carpal tunnel release leads to substantial improvements in both subjective and SPR sleep quality in CTS patients, with increasing concordance over time. However, persistent discordance in some individuals underscores the need for multidimensional assessment and individualized management.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IIb.
目的腕管综合征(CTS)常与睡眠障碍相关,严重影响生活质量。大多数研究都集中在主观睡眠或标准化患者报告(SPR)测量上,但这些测量在手术前后的一致性尚不清楚。我们的目的是确定一致性和不一致性的比率,以及相关因素,最终提出策略,以加强这些患者的评估过程和术后护理。方法采用单中心观察性研究,纳入104例行腕管松解术的成年CTS患者,分为回顾性(71例)和前瞻性(33例)两组。主观睡眠质量由患者自我报告评估,而SPR包括匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)和失眠严重指数(ISI)。术前、术后1、3、12个月进行评估。在每个时间点确定主观结果与SPR结果的一致性。结果术前,100%的患者报告睡眠不良,所有患者PSQI >; 5, ISI > 7(完全一致)。术后主观睡眠质量和SPR睡眠质量均有明显改善。12个月时,95.77%的患者自我报告睡眠良好;95.77%的患者PSQI≤5,91.55%的患者ISI≤7。主观和SPR评估之间的一致性随着时间的推移而增加,但少数患者继续表现出不一致,在某些情况下,在SPR正常化之前自我感知改善。PSQI与ISI在各时间点呈显著正相关。结论腕管释放可显著改善CTS患者主观睡眠质量和SPR睡眠质量,且随着时间的推移,一致性增强。然而,一些个体的持续不一致强调了多维评估和个性化管理的必要性。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IIb。
{"title":"Concordance Between Subjective Sleep and PSQI/ISI in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients: A Comparative Study Before and After Surgery","authors":"Sang Anh Nguyen MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Doanh Quoc Tran MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100870","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100870","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is frequently associated with sleep disturbances that considerably impair quality of life. Most studies have focused on either subjective sleep or standardized patient-reported (SPR) measures, but the concordance between these measures before and after surgery remains unclear. We aimed to determine the rates of concordance and discordance, along with the associated factors, ultimately proposing strategies to enhance the assessment process and postoperative care for these patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single-center observational study including 104 adult CTS patients who underwent carpal tunnel release, divided into retrospective (n = 71) and prospective (n = 33) cohorts. Subjective sleep quality was assessed by patient self-report, whereas SPR included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Assessments were performed before surgery and at 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery. Concordance between subjective and SPR results was determined at each time point.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Before surgery, 100% of patients reported poor sleep, with all having PSQI &gt; 5 and ISI &gt; 7 (full concordance). After surgery, both subjective and SPR sleep quality improved significantly. At 12 months, 95.77% of patients self-reported good sleep; 95.77% had PSQI ≤ 5, and 91.55% had ISI ≤ 7. Concordance between subjective and SPR assessments increased over time, but a minority of patients continued to exhibit discordance, with self-perceived improvement preceding SPR normalization in some cases. Strong positive correlations were found between PSQI and ISI at all time points.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Carpal tunnel release leads to substantial improvements in both subjective and SPR sleep quality in CTS patients, with increasing concordance over time. However, persistent discordance in some individuals underscores the need for multidimensional assessment and individualized management.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IIb.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"8 1","pages":"Article 100870"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145420386","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1