首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online最新文献

英文 中文
Evaluating Pedicled Groin Flap Reconstruction in Hand Degloving Injuries: A Retrospective Analysis 带蒂腹股沟皮瓣重建手部脱手套损伤的回顾性分析
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100828
Saleh Abualhaj MD , Yazan S. Al-Zamer MD , Lina Al-Shadfan MD , Mosleh Abualhaj PhD , Ali aloun MD , Basel Joseph Massad MD

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of pedicled groin flap coverage in such injuries and identify factors associated with postoperative complications and flap viability.

Methods

A retrospective review of 23 patients who underwent pedicled groin flap reconstruction for finger or hand degloving injuries between 2015 and 2024 was conducted. Patient demographics, surgical details, complication rates, aesthetic outcomes, and functional recovery were analyzed.

Results

The cohort had a mean age of 27.9 years, with a male predominance (73.9%) and a high smoking rate (73.9%). Most defects involved the fingers (87%), with a mean defect size of 30.6 cm2 and a mean flap size of 72.0 cm2. The mean wound healing time was 32.5 days, and the average hospital stay was 3.6 days. Flap success was achieved in 91.3% of the cases. Postoperative complications occurred in 34.8% of the patients, including partial flap necrosis (26.1%), wound dehiscence (13.0%), and infection (4.3%). Intraoperative venous congestion was observed in 39.1% of the cases and was more frequent among patients who developed complications (P = .001). Other variables showing statistically significant differences between patients with and without complications included smoking status (P = .037), additional procedures performed (P = .037), and smaller defect dimensions (P = .011 for width; P = .032 for size). Aesthetic outcomes were rated as good or neutral in over 90% of the cases. Functionally, 91.3% of the patients experienced minimal-to-mild disability, with a mean QuickDASH score of 18.1 (SD = 14.1). Patients with complications had higher disability scores (mean: 27.9 vs 12.9; P = .012).

Conclusions

Groin flap reconstruction remains a reliable and accessible option for managing hand degloving injuries, particularly in resource-limited settings, offering acceptable functional and aesthetic outcomes despite a relatively high rate of secondary procedures.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.
目的评价带蒂腹股沟皮瓣复盖治疗此类损伤的临床效果,探讨影响术后并发症及皮瓣存活的相关因素。方法回顾性分析2015年至2024年23例手指或手部脱手套损伤行带蒂腹股沟皮瓣重建术的病例。分析了患者人口统计学、手术细节、并发症发生率、美学结果和功能恢复情况。结果该队列平均年龄27.9岁,男性占73.9%,吸烟率较高(73.9%)。大多数缺损涉及手指(87%),平均缺损面积为30.6 cm2,平均皮瓣面积为72.0 cm2。平均创面愈合时间32.5 d,平均住院时间3.6 d。皮瓣移植成功率为91.3%。术后并发症发生率为34.8%,其中皮瓣部分坏死(26.1%)、创面裂开(13.0%)、感染(4.3%)。39.1%的患者术中出现静脉充血,在出现并发症的患者中更为常见(P = 0.001)。其他在有和没有并发症的患者之间显示有统计学意义差异的变量包括吸烟状况(P = 0.037)、额外的手术(P = 0.037)和较小的缺陷尺寸(宽度P = 0.011,大小P = 0.032)。在超过90%的病例中,美学结果被评为良好或中性。在功能上,91.3%的患者经历了轻微至轻度残疾,平均QuickDASH评分为18.1 (SD = 14.1)。并发症患者的残疾评分较高(平均:27.9比12.9;P = 0.012)。结论腹股沟皮瓣重建仍然是处理手部脱手套损伤的一种可靠和可获得的选择,特别是在资源有限的情况下,尽管二次手术的比例相对较高,但它提供了可接受的功能和美观结果。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性
{"title":"Evaluating Pedicled Groin Flap Reconstruction in Hand Degloving Injuries: A Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Saleh Abualhaj MD ,&nbsp;Yazan S. Al-Zamer MD ,&nbsp;Lina Al-Shadfan MD ,&nbsp;Mosleh Abualhaj PhD ,&nbsp;Ali aloun MD ,&nbsp;Basel Joseph Massad MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100828","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100828","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of pedicled groin flap coverage in such injuries and identify factors associated with postoperative complications and flap viability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review of 23 patients who underwent pedicled groin flap reconstruction for finger or hand degloving injuries between 2015 and 2024 was conducted. Patient demographics, surgical details, complication rates, aesthetic outcomes, and functional recovery were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort had a mean age of 27.9 years, with a male predominance (73.9%) and a high smoking rate (73.9%). Most defects involved the fingers (87%), with a mean defect size of 30.6 cm<sup>2</sup> and a mean flap size of 72.0 cm<sup>2</sup>. The mean wound healing time was 32.5 days, and the average hospital stay was 3.6 days. Flap success was achieved in 91.3% of the cases. Postoperative complications occurred in 34.8% of the patients, including partial flap necrosis (26.1%), wound dehiscence (13.0%), and infection (4.3%). Intraoperative venous congestion was observed in 39.1% of the cases and was more frequent among patients who developed complications (<em>P</em> = .001). Other variables showing statistically significant differences between patients with and without complications included smoking status (<em>P</em> = .037), additional procedures performed (<em>P</em> = .037), and smaller defect dimensions (<em>P</em> = .011 for width; <em>P</em> = .032 for size). Aesthetic outcomes were rated as good or neutral in over 90% of the cases. Functionally, 91.3% of the patients experienced minimal-to-mild disability, with a mean <em>Quick</em>DASH score of 18.1 (SD = 14.1). Patients with complications had higher disability scores (mean: 27.9 vs 12.9; <em>P</em> = .012).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Groin flap reconstruction remains a reliable and accessible option for managing hand degloving injuries, particularly in resource-limited settings, offering acceptable functional and aesthetic outcomes despite a relatively high rate of secondary procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100828"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145044834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Differences in the Outcomes of Early Active Mobilization Following Flexor Tendon Repair Between Zone 1 and Distal Zone 2 Injuries 屈肌腱1区和远端2区损伤后早期主动活动修复结果的差异
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100826
Koji Moriya MD , Yutaka Maki MD , Hisao Koda MD , Masahiro Odagiri OT , Shota Matsuzawa OT , Naoto Tsubokawa MD

Purpose

Complete release of the A4 pulley is recommended for flexor tendon repair to allow smooth tendon excursion, provided the proximal sheath is mostly intact. However, it is unclear whether the active range of motion of finger joints differs when the flexor digitorum profundus tendon is repaired at different levels with A4 pulley release. We evaluated differences in the outcomes of flexor tendon repair of zone 1 and zone 2A injuries using a six-strand suture (the Yoshizu #1 technique) and complete release of the A4 pulley, followed by an early active mobilization protocol.

Methods

This retrospective case series analyzed 27 fingers from 22 patients: 12 index, 5 middle, 4 ring, and 6 little fingers. There were 13 zone 1 injuries in 12 patients and 14 zone 2A injuries in 10 patients. All tendons were repaired using the same technique, followed by a controlled active mobilization regimen initiated within the first three postoperative weeks. The follow-up period averaged 7 months (range: 3–13 months).

Results

No tendon bowstringing was evident in any finger. Rupture of one flexor tendon repair occurred 8 weeks after primary surgery in one patient with a zone 1 injury. Excluding this case, no significant differences were observed in the active range of motion of the two finger joints between patients with zone 1 and 2A injuries. However, active motion of the distal interphalangeal joint of zone 1 was significantly reduced compared with that of zone 2A, given the increase in the total extension deficit.

Conclusions

In this series, although complete release of the A4 pulley and postoperative treatment were performed in the same way, zone 1 injuries demonstrated greater total extension deficits and failed to achieve distal interphalangeal joint motion outcomes comparable with those observed in zone 2A injuries.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.
目的:在近端肌腱鞘基本完整的情况下,建议完全释放A4滑轮进行屈肌腱修复,以使肌腱平滑移位。然而,目前尚不清楚的是,采用A4滑轮松解在不同水平修复指深屈肌腱时,手指关节的活动范围是否不同。我们评估了使用六股缝线(Yoshizu #1技术)修复1区和2A区屈肌腱损伤的结果差异,并完全释放A4滑轮,随后进行早期主动活动方案。方法回顾性分析22例患者27根手指,其中食指12根,中指5根,无名指4根,小指6根。1区损伤13例12例,2A区损伤14例10例。所有肌腱使用相同的技术修复,随后在术后前三周内开始有控制的主动活动方案。随访时间平均为7个月(范围3-13个月)。结果所有手指均未见明显弓形腱束。1例1区损伤患者在初次手术后8周发生屈肌腱修复断裂。除本病例外,1区和2A区损伤患者的两指关节活动范围无明显差异。然而,与2A区相比,1区远端指间关节的主动活动明显减少,因为总伸展缺损增加。结论在本研究中,尽管采用相同的方法进行A4滑轮的完全松解和术后治疗,但与2A区损伤相比,1区损伤表现出更大的总伸展缺损,无法实现远端指间关节活动。研究类型/证据水平治疗性IV。
{"title":"Differences in the Outcomes of Early Active Mobilization Following Flexor Tendon Repair Between Zone 1 and Distal Zone 2 Injuries","authors":"Koji Moriya MD ,&nbsp;Yutaka Maki MD ,&nbsp;Hisao Koda MD ,&nbsp;Masahiro Odagiri OT ,&nbsp;Shota Matsuzawa OT ,&nbsp;Naoto Tsubokawa MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100826","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100826","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Complete release of the A4 pulley is recommended for flexor tendon repair to allow smooth tendon excursion, provided the proximal sheath is mostly intact. However, it is unclear whether the active range of motion of finger joints differs when the flexor digitorum profundus tendon is repaired at different levels with A4 pulley release. We evaluated differences in the outcomes of flexor tendon repair of zone 1 and zone 2A injuries using a six-strand suture (the Yoshizu #1 technique) and complete release of the A4 pulley, followed by an early active mobilization protocol.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective case series analyzed 27 fingers from 22 patients: 12 index, 5 middle, 4 ring, and 6 little fingers. There were 13 zone 1 injuries in 12 patients and 14 zone 2A injuries in 10 patients. All tendons were repaired using the same technique, followed by a controlled active mobilization regimen initiated within the first three postoperative weeks. The follow-up period averaged 7 months (range: 3–13 months).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No tendon bowstringing was evident in any finger. Rupture of one flexor tendon repair occurred 8 weeks after primary surgery in one patient with a zone 1 injury. Excluding this case, no significant differences were observed in the active range of motion of the two finger joints between patients with zone 1 and 2A injuries. However, active motion of the distal interphalangeal joint of zone 1 was significantly reduced compared with that of zone 2A, given the increase in the total extension deficit.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this series, although complete release of the A4 pulley and postoperative treatment were performed in the same way, zone 1 injuries demonstrated greater total extension deficits and failed to achieve distal interphalangeal joint motion outcomes comparable with those observed in zone 2A injuries.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100826"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145044847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence Can Answer Postoperative Questions About Distal Radius Fractures—But Can Patients Understand the Answers? 人工智能可以回答桡骨远端骨折术后的问题——但患者能理解答案吗?
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100822
Rae Tarapore MD , Suhasini Gupta MD , Kenneth R. Means Jr MD , Aviram M. Giladi MD, MS

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the validity, reliability, and readability of responses to common patient questions about postoperative from ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Gemini.

Methods

Twenty-seven thoroughly vetted questions regarding distal radius fractures repair surgery were compiled and entered into ChatGPT 4, Gemini, and Copilot. The responses were analyzed for quality, accuracy, and readability using the DISCERN scale, the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria, Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Score, and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. Citations provided by Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot were further categorized by source of reference. Five questions were resubmitted, requesting response simplification. The responses were re-evaluated using the same metrics.

Results

All three artificial intelligence platforms produced answers that were considered “good” quality (DISCERN scores >50). Copilot had the highest quality of information (68.3), followed by Gemini (62.9) and ChatGPT (52.9). The information provided by Copilot demonstrated the highest reliability, with a Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criterion of 3 (of 4) compared with Gemini (1) and ChatGPT (0). All three platforms generated complex texts with Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Scores ranging between 35.8 and 41.4 and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores between 10.5 and 12.1, indicating a minimum of high-school graduate reading level required. After simplification, Gemini’s reading level remained unchanged, whereas ChatGPT improved to that of a seventh-grade reading level and Copilot improved to that of an eighth-grade reading level. Copilot had a higher number of references (74) compared with Gemini (36).

Conclusions

All three platforms provided safe and reliable answers to postoperative questions about distal radius fractures. High reading levels provided by AI remain the biggest barrier to patient accessibility.

Clinical relevance

For the current state of mainstream AI platforms, they are best suited as adjunct tools to support, rather than replace, clinical communication from health care workers.
目的本研究的目的是评估ChatGPT、Microsoft Copilot和谷歌Gemini对术后常见患者问题的回答的效度、信度和可读性。方法对27个经过彻底审核的桡骨远端骨折修复手术问题进行整理,输入ChatGPT 4、Gemini和Copilot。使用DISCERN量表、美国医学协会杂志基准标准、Flesch-Kincaid阅读简易评分和Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level来分析回答的质量、准确性和可读性。谷歌Gemini和Microsoft Copilot提供的引文进一步按参考来源分类。重新提出了五个问题,要求简化答复。使用相同的指标重新评估这些反应。结果所有三个人工智能平台都给出了被认为质量“良好”的答案(DISCERN得分>;50)。副驾驶的信息质量最高(68.3),其次是双子座(62.9)和ChatGPT(52.9)。与Gemini(1)和ChatGPT(0)相比,Copilot提供的信息显示出最高的可靠性,美国医学协会杂志的基准标准为3(4)。这三个平台生成的复杂文本的Flesch-Kincaid阅读难度分数在35.8到41.4之间,Flesch-Kincaid年级水平分数在10.5到12.1之间,这表明需要达到高中毕业生的最低阅读水平。简化后,Gemini的阅读水平保持不变,ChatGPT提高到七年级阅读水平,Copilot提高到八年级阅读水平。副驾驶的参考文献数(74)高于双子星(36)。结论三种平台均为桡骨远端骨折术后问题提供了安全可靠的答案。人工智能提供的高阅读水平仍然是患者可及性的最大障碍。就目前主流人工智能平台的状况而言,它们最适合作为辅助工具来支持,而不是取代卫生保健工作者的临床沟通。
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Can Answer Postoperative Questions About Distal Radius Fractures—But Can Patients Understand the Answers?","authors":"Rae Tarapore MD ,&nbsp;Suhasini Gupta MD ,&nbsp;Kenneth R. Means Jr MD ,&nbsp;Aviram M. Giladi MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100822","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100822","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to assess the validity, reliability, and readability of responses to common patient questions about postoperative from ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Gemini.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty-seven thoroughly vetted questions regarding distal radius fractures repair surgery were compiled and entered into ChatGPT 4, Gemini, and Copilot. The responses were analyzed for quality, accuracy, and readability using the DISCERN scale, the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria, Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Score, and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. Citations provided by Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot were further categorized by source of reference. Five questions were resubmitted, requesting response simplification. The responses were re-evaluated using the same metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All three artificial intelligence platforms produced answers that were considered “good” quality (DISCERN scores &gt;50). Copilot had the highest quality of information (68.3), followed by Gemini (62.9) and ChatGPT (52.9). The information provided by Copilot demonstrated the highest reliability, with a Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criterion of 3 (of 4) compared with Gemini (1) and ChatGPT (0). All three platforms generated complex texts with Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Scores ranging between 35.8 and 41.4 and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores between 10.5 and 12.1, indicating a minimum of high-school graduate reading level required. After simplification, Gemini’s reading level remained unchanged, whereas ChatGPT improved to that of a seventh-grade reading level and Copilot improved to that of an eighth-grade reading level. Copilot had a higher number of references (74) compared with Gemini (36).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>All three platforms provided safe and reliable answers to postoperative questions about distal radius fractures. High reading levels provided by AI remain the biggest barrier to patient accessibility.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>For the current state of mainstream AI platforms, they are best suited as adjunct tools to support, rather than replace, clinical communication from health care workers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100822"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145044849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Modified Posterior Approach to the Nerve Transfer of the Spinal Accessory Nerve to the Suprascapular Nerve 脊神经副神经至肩胛上神经转移的改良后入路
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100821
Lenny L. Rivera-Rosario MD , Ruben Tresgallo Parés MD , José I. Acosta-Julbe MD , Alexandra Claudio Marcano MD , Joseph Salem-Hernández BS , Gerardo S. Caussade Silvestrini BS , Norman Ramirez MD , Christian Foy-Parrilla MD

Purpose

Restoration of shoulder abduction and external rotation is critical in patients with upper brachial plexus injuries (BPIs). The transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve is a well-established surgical technique; however, the optimal approach remains debated. The traditional posterior approach may compromise muscle integrity because of trapezius detachment and splitting of the supraspinatus. This study introduces a muscle-sparing modification to the posterior approach and evaluates functional outcomes in pediatric and adult patients with obstetric or traumatic BPIs.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer using a muscle-sparing posterior approach from September 2018 to November 2022. Inclusion criteria comprised pediatric patients (aged ≤18 months) with obstetric BPIs and adult patients with traumatic BPIs with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 24 months. Pediatric patients were evaluated using the Toronto Muscle Grading System, Modified Mallet Grading System, and Birch Triple System. Adults were assessed using range of motion and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores.

Results

Fourteen patients met the inclusion criteria (six pediatric and eight adult). Pediatric outcomes demonstrated Modified Mallet Grading System scores of grade IV and Birch Triple System stages IV–V, indicating good shoulder function. Toronto Muscle Grading System scores of 3 reflected active movement against gravity. Among adults, mean forward flexion improved from 35° to 53°, abduction improved from 28° to 47°, and external rotation improved from 12° to 23°. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire score improved from 91 to 48, exceeding the minimal clinically notable difference. No complications were observed.

Conclusions

The muscle-sparing posterior approach for spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer is a safe and effective technique that yields favorable functional outcomes in both pediatric and adult BPI populations. Further comparative studies are warranted.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.
目的肩部外展和外旋的恢复是上臂神经丛损伤(BPIs)患者的关键。脊副神经到肩胛上神经的转移是一种成熟的手术技术;然而,最佳方法仍存在争议。由于斜方肌脱离和冈上肌分裂,传统的后入路可能会损害肌肉的完整性。本研究介绍了一种保留肌肉的后路手术方法,并评估了产科或创伤性bpi的儿童和成人患者的功能结局。方法回顾性分析2018年9月至2022年11月经保肌后路行脊副神经至肩胛上神经转移的患者。纳入标准包括产科bpi的儿科患者(年龄≤18个月)和创伤性bpi的成人患者,术后随访时间至少为24个月。使用多伦多肌肉分级系统、改良木槌分级系统和桦木三重分级系统对儿科患者进行评估。成人评估使用活动范围和残疾的手臂,肩膀和手问卷得分。结果14例患者符合纳入标准(儿童6例,成人8例)。儿童结局显示改良的Mallet分级系统评分为IV级,Birch三重系统评分为IV - v级,表明肩部功能良好。多伦多肌肉分级系统的3分反映了积极的运动对抗重力。在成人中,平均前屈从35°改善到53°,外展从28°改善到47°,外旋从12°改善到23°。手臂、肩膀和手的平均残疾问卷得分从91分提高到48分,超过了最小的临床显著差异。无并发症发生。结论保留肌肉后路脊副神经转肩胛上神经是一种安全有效的技术,在儿童和成人BPI人群中均能获得良好的功能预后。进一步的比较研究是必要的。研究类型/证据水平治疗性IV。
{"title":"A Modified Posterior Approach to the Nerve Transfer of the Spinal Accessory Nerve to the Suprascapular Nerve","authors":"Lenny L. Rivera-Rosario MD ,&nbsp;Ruben Tresgallo Parés MD ,&nbsp;José I. Acosta-Julbe MD ,&nbsp;Alexandra Claudio Marcano MD ,&nbsp;Joseph Salem-Hernández BS ,&nbsp;Gerardo S. Caussade Silvestrini BS ,&nbsp;Norman Ramirez MD ,&nbsp;Christian Foy-Parrilla MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100821","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100821","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Restoration of shoulder abduction and external rotation is critical in patients with upper brachial plexus injuries (BPIs). The transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve is a well-established surgical technique; however, the optimal approach remains debated. The traditional posterior approach may compromise muscle integrity because of trapezius detachment and splitting of the supraspinatus. This study introduces a muscle-sparing modification to the posterior approach and evaluates functional outcomes in pediatric and adult patients with obstetric or traumatic BPIs.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review was conducted on patients who underwent spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer using a muscle-sparing posterior approach from September 2018 to November 2022. Inclusion criteria comprised pediatric patients (aged ≤18 months) with obstetric BPIs and adult patients with traumatic BPIs with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 24 months. Pediatric patients were evaluated using the Toronto Muscle Grading System, Modified Mallet Grading System, and Birch Triple System. Adults were assessed using range of motion and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire scores.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Fourteen patients met the inclusion criteria (six pediatric and eight adult). Pediatric outcomes demonstrated Modified Mallet Grading System scores of grade IV and Birch Triple System stages IV–V, indicating good shoulder function. Toronto Muscle Grading System scores of 3 reflected active movement against gravity. Among adults, mean forward flexion improved from 35° to 53°, abduction improved from 28° to 47°, and external rotation improved from 12° to 23°. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire score improved from 91 to 48, exceeding the minimal clinically notable difference. No complications were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The muscle-sparing posterior approach for spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer is a safe and effective technique that yields favorable functional outcomes in both pediatric and adult BPI populations. Further comparative studies are warranted.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100821"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145044982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and Application of the WFS-175: A Novel Multidimensional Score for Wrist Function WFS-175的开发与应用:一种新的腕部功能多维评分方法
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100819
Sang Anh Nguyen MD , Doanh Quoc Tran PhD

Purpose

We present a novel protocol for wrist function assessment that integrates both objective factors (range of motion and grip strength) and subjective domains (pain, motor function, and quality of life) into the composite Wrist Function Score - 175 (WFS-175) score.

Methods

The protocol consists of three main steps: (1) data collection, which involves measuring the wrist range of motion in six directions using a goniometer and grip strength, including maximum strength, endurance, and recovery, using a Jamar dynamometer, alongside concurrent subjective assessment with a standardized questionnaire; (2) standardization of all data onto a unified scoring scale, applying a linear formula to calculate the total WFS-175 score (maximum 175 points), with the following components: range of motion (30 points), grip strength (40 points), pain (25 points), motor function (40 points), and quality of life (40 points); and (3) input of results into the AppSheet/Google Sheets system, which provides automated calculation, storage, reporting, and graphical visualization for longitudinal tracking of functional recovery.

Results

This protocol yields a standardized assessment form that enables precise calculation of the WFS-175 score. It integrates muscular endurance and recovery measures and fully digitalizes the workflow.

Conclusions

Initial applications show that the WFS-175 score effectively evaluates wrist function and tracks recovery over time. For example, a postoperative patient scored 164/175, indicating excellent recovery.

Clinical relevance

The WFS-175 protocol offers a novel and digital-ready solution for standardized wrist function assessment. By combining objective and subjective measures in one scoring system, it enhances sensitivity and supports clinical decision making in modern rehabilitation.
目的:我们提出了一种新的腕功能评估方案,该方案将客观因素(活动范围和握力)和主观因素(疼痛、运动功能和生活质量)整合到综合腕功能评分-175 (WFS-175)评分中。方法该方案包括三个主要步骤:(1)数据收集,包括使用角计测量腕部在六个方向的运动范围和握力,包括最大力量,耐力和恢复,使用Jamar测力仪,同时使用标准化问卷进行主观评估;(2)将所有数据标准化到统一的评分量表上,应用线性公式计算WFS-175总分(最高175分),其中运动范围(30分)、握力(40分)、疼痛(25分)、运动功能(40分)、生活质量(40分);(3)将结果输入AppSheet/谷歌Sheets系统,该系统提供自动计算、存储、报告和图形可视化,用于功能恢复的纵向跟踪。结果该方案产生了一个标准化的评估表格,可以精确计算WFS-175评分。它整合了肌肉耐力和恢复措施,并将工作流程完全数字化。初步应用表明,WFS-175评分可有效评估腕关节功能,并随时间跟踪腕关节恢复情况。例如,术后患者得分为164/175,表明恢复良好。临床相关性WFS-175方案为标准化腕功能评估提供了一种新颖的数字化解决方案。将客观指标和主观指标结合在一个评分系统中,提高了敏感性,为现代康复的临床决策提供了支持。
{"title":"Development and Application of the WFS-175: A Novel Multidimensional Score for Wrist Function","authors":"Sang Anh Nguyen MD ,&nbsp;Doanh Quoc Tran PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100819","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100819","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We present a novel protocol for wrist function assessment that integrates both objective factors (range of motion and grip strength) and subjective domains (pain, motor function, and quality of life) into the composite Wrist Function Score - 175 (WFS-175) score.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The protocol consists of three main steps: (1) data collection, which involves measuring the wrist range of motion in six directions using a goniometer and grip strength, including maximum strength, endurance, and recovery, using a Jamar dynamometer, alongside concurrent subjective assessment with a standardized questionnaire; (2) standardization of all data onto a unified scoring scale, applying a linear formula to calculate the total WFS-175 score (maximum 175 points), with the following components: range of motion (30 points), grip strength (40 points), pain (25 points), motor function (40 points), and quality of life (40 points); and (3) input of results into the AppSheet/Google Sheets system, which provides automated calculation, storage, reporting, and graphical visualization for longitudinal tracking of functional recovery.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This protocol yields a standardized assessment form that enables precise calculation of the WFS-175 score. It integrates muscular endurance and recovery measures and fully digitalizes the workflow.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Initial applications show that the WFS-175 score effectively evaluates wrist function and tracks recovery over time. For example, a postoperative patient scored 164/175, indicating excellent recovery.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>The WFS-175 protocol offers a novel and digital-ready solution for standardized wrist function assessment. By combining objective and subjective measures in one scoring system, it enhances sensitivity and supports clinical decision making in modern rehabilitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100819"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144917639","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation and Management of Complications Following Percutaneous K-Wire Fixation in Hand and Wrist Fractures 手腕部骨折经皮k针固定术后并发症的评价与处理
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100791
Mehmet Yalçın MD , Yusuf Kıratlıoğlu MD , Ömer Erim Kepenekçi MD , Mehmet Armangil MD , Uğur Bezirgan MD

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the frequency and management of complications in patients who underwent percutaneous K-wire fixation for hand and wrist fractures caused by trauma.

Methods

A total of 143 patients (112 men, 31 women) with 333 K-wires were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, surgical techniques, postoperative care, and complications were reviewed. Minor complications included pin loosening, migration, and superficial infections, while major complications included nonunion, malunion, and osteomyelitis.

Results

Complications were observed in 23 patients (16%), including six major and 17 minor cases. The most common complications were pin loosening (five patients), infection (six patients), and pin migration (seven patients). Infections were primarily caused by Staphylococcus aureus, identified in three cases. Nonunion and malunion required secondary interventions, whereas one osteomyelitis case necessitated surgical debridement and prolonged antibiotics.

Conclusions

Complications occurred in 16% of cases, with pin migration, loosening, and infection being the most frequent issues. Although most complications were minor and manageable, major complications such as nonunion and osteomyelitis necessitated additional surgical interventions.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.
目的本研究旨在评估外伤所致手部和腕部骨折经皮k针固定的并发症发生频率和处理方法。方法对143例患者(男112例,女31例)333根k -钢丝进行回顾性分析。回顾了人口统计资料、手术技术、术后护理和并发症。次要并发症包括针松动、移位和浅表感染,而主要并发症包括骨不连、骨不愈合和骨髓炎。结果共发生并发症23例(16%),其中严重并发症6例,轻微并发症17例。最常见的并发症是针松动(5例)、感染(6例)和针移位(7例)。感染主要是由金黄色葡萄球菌引起的,在三个病例中发现。骨不连和骨不连需要二次干预,而一例骨髓炎需要手术清创和长期使用抗生素。结论16%的病例出现并发症,其中针移位、松动和感染是最常见的问题。虽然大多数并发症是轻微和可控的,但主要并发症如骨不连和骨髓炎需要额外的手术干预。研究类型/证据水平治疗性IV。
{"title":"Evaluation and Management of Complications Following Percutaneous K-Wire Fixation in Hand and Wrist Fractures","authors":"Mehmet Yalçın MD ,&nbsp;Yusuf Kıratlıoğlu MD ,&nbsp;Ömer Erim Kepenekçi MD ,&nbsp;Mehmet Armangil MD ,&nbsp;Uğur Bezirgan MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100791","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100791","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the frequency and management of complications in patients who underwent percutaneous K-wire fixation for hand and wrist fractures caused by trauma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 143 patients (112 men, 31 women) with 333 K-wires were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, surgical techniques, postoperative care, and complications were reviewed. Minor complications included pin loosening, migration, and superficial infections, while major complications included nonunion, malunion, and osteomyelitis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Complications were observed in 23 patients (16%), including six major and 17 minor cases. The most common complications were pin loosening (five patients), infection (six patients), and pin migration (seven patients). Infections were primarily caused by <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, identified in three cases. Nonunion and malunion required secondary interventions, whereas one osteomyelitis case necessitated surgical debridement and prolonged antibiotics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Complications occurred in 16% of cases, with pin migration, loosening, and infection being the most frequent issues. Although most complications were minor and manageable, major complications such as nonunion and osteomyelitis necessitated additional surgical interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100791"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144917637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet in Adolescent Hand Surgery: A Systematic Review 青少年手外科全清醒局麻无止血带:系统回顾
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100820
Hannah Polley BMSc , Benjamin Blackman BHSc , John Tristan Cassidy MBBCh, MCh , Johan van der Stok MD, PhD

Purpose

Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) allows for intraoperative assessment of function while minimizing systemic anesthesia effects and is frequently used in adult hand surgery. However, the safety and feasibility of WALANT in adolescents remains uncertain because of potential challenges with adherence and cooperation. This review aimed to compile the evidence for using WALANT in adolescents.

Methods

PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to December 2024. Comparative and cohort studies were included. Outcomes, including procedure time, length of hospital stay, and pain scores, were analyzed. Because of the heterogeneity of outcomes investigated, a narrative review was performed.

Results

Four studies, three case-control studies (n = 287) and one case series (n = 6), involving 166 WALANT surgeries were included. The mean age across all patients, including WALANT and control, was 14, with a range of 7–20 years old. The most common WALANT procedures were tendon repair (22.3%, n = 37) and ganglion removal (22.3%, n = 37), followed by digital nerve repair (18.1%, n = 30). One conversion (0.6%) to a general anesthetic was reported.

Conclusions

Current evidence on the utilization of WALANT in adolescents is limited; WALANT may reduce procedure time, length of hospital stay, and improve pain scores.
Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.
目的:广泛清醒局麻无止血带(WALANT)允许术中功能评估,同时最大限度地减少全身麻醉的影响,经常用于成人手外科手术。然而,青少年WALANT的安全性和可行性仍然不确定,因为在依从性和合作方面存在潜在的挑战。本综述旨在收集在青少年中使用WALANT的证据。方法检索spubmed、Medline、Embase和Scopus数据库,检索时间为建站至2024年12月。包括比较研究和队列研究。结果包括手术时间、住院时间和疼痛评分。由于调查结果的异质性,我们进行了叙述性回顾。结果纳入4项研究,3项病例对照研究(n = 287)和1个病例系列研究(n = 6),涉及166例WALANT手术。包括WALANT和对照组在内的所有患者的平均年龄为14岁,年龄范围为7-20岁。最常见的WALANT手术是肌腱修复(22.3%,n = 37)和神经节切除(22.3%,n = 37),其次是指神经修复(18.1%,n = 30)。据报道,1例(0.6%)转为全麻。结论目前关于青少年使用WALANT的证据有限;WALANT可以缩短手术时间,缩短住院时间,改善疼痛评分。研究类型/证据水平:治疗性IV。
{"title":"Wide-Awake Local Anesthesia No Tourniquet in Adolescent Hand Surgery: A Systematic Review","authors":"Hannah Polley BMSc ,&nbsp;Benjamin Blackman BHSc ,&nbsp;John Tristan Cassidy MBBCh, MCh ,&nbsp;Johan van der Stok MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100820","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100820","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) allows for intraoperative assessment of function while minimizing systemic anesthesia effects and is frequently used in adult hand surgery. However, the safety and feasibility of WALANT in adolescents remains uncertain because of potential challenges with adherence and cooperation. This review aimed to compile the evidence for using WALANT in adolescents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to December 2024. Comparative and cohort studies were included. Outcomes, including procedure time, length of hospital stay, and pain scores, were analyzed. Because of the heterogeneity of outcomes investigated, a narrative review was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Four studies, three case-control studies (n = 287) and one case series (n = 6), involving 166 WALANT surgeries were included. The mean age across all patients, including WALANT and control, was 14, with a range of 7–20 years old. The most common WALANT procedures were tendon repair (22.3%, n = 37) and ganglion removal (22.3%, n = 37), followed by digital nerve repair (18.1%, n = 30). One conversion (0.6%) to a general anesthetic was reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Current evidence on the utilization of WALANT in adolescents is limited; WALANT may reduce procedure time, length of hospital stay, and improve pain scores.</div><div>Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100820"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144917636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Individualization of Donor Nerve Selection With Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring in Axillary Nerve Neurotization 腋窝神经化术中神经监测下供体神经选择的个体化
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100818
Guillermo José Tarnawski-Español MD , Maria Rosa Morro-Martí MD, PhD , Manuel Llusá-Pérez MD, PhD , Isabel Fernández-Conejero MD , Júlia Benítez-Flores MD , Aritz Ortega-Centol MD , Joaquim Casañas-Sintes MD, PhD

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the use of intraoperative nerve conduction studies in radial to axillary nerve transfers using the motor branches to the triceps. We hypothesized that morphological characteristics might not fully express a donor nerve’s suitability for transfer and that choosing the donor branch based on nerve action potential (NAP) amplitudes would lead to better functional outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included 17 patients who underwent radial to axillary nerve transfer. The specific triceps motor branch used as donor and the site of neurorrhaphy were chosen based on intraoperative NAP amplitudes independently of morphological criteria, such as size matching or arc of rotation.

Results

We found a moderate correlation between the NAP amplitude of the transferred branch and shoulder abduction strength at the end of the follow-up. The branch to the lateral head of the triceps was the most often selected as a donor. Outcomes were satisfactory in 14 out of 17 patients.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that reinnervation is enhanced when the choice of the donor branch is individualized and based on functional metrics like NAP, instead of anatomical characteristics. The study supports the role of intraoperative nerve monitoring as an objective and predictable method to refine donor branch selection in radial to axillary nerve transfer.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.
目的:本研究旨在评价术中神经传导研究在肱三头肌运动分支桡神经到腋窝神经转移中的应用。我们假设形态学特征可能不能完全表达供体神经移植的适宜性,根据神经动作电位(NAP)振幅选择供体神经分支可能会导致更好的功能结果。方法回顾性分析17例行桡神经到腋窝神经移植的患者。具体的肱三头肌运动分支作为供体和神经缝合的位置是根据术中NAP的振幅来选择的,不依赖于形态学标准,如大小匹配或旋转弧度。结果在随访结束时,我们发现转移分支的NAP振幅与肩关节外展强度之间存在适度的相关性。三头肌外侧头的分支是最常选择的供体。17例患者中有14例结果满意。结论研究结果表明,当选择个体化的供神经分支时,基于功能指标如NAP,而不是解剖学特征,可以增强神经再生。本研究支持术中神经监测作为一种客观、可预测的方法,在桡骨到腋窝神经移植中完善供体分支的选择。研究类型/证据水平治疗性IV。
{"title":"Individualization of Donor Nerve Selection With Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring in Axillary Nerve Neurotization","authors":"Guillermo José Tarnawski-Español MD ,&nbsp;Maria Rosa Morro-Martí MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Manuel Llusá-Pérez MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Isabel Fernández-Conejero MD ,&nbsp;Júlia Benítez-Flores MD ,&nbsp;Aritz Ortega-Centol MD ,&nbsp;Joaquim Casañas-Sintes MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100818","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100818","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the use of intraoperative nerve conduction studies in radial to axillary nerve transfers using the motor branches to the triceps. We hypothesized that morphological characteristics might not fully express a donor nerve’s suitability for transfer and that choosing the donor branch based on nerve action potential (NAP) amplitudes would lead to better functional outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective analysis included 17 patients who underwent radial to axillary nerve transfer. The specific triceps motor branch used as donor and the site of neurorrhaphy were chosen based on intraoperative NAP amplitudes independently of morphological criteria, such as size matching or arc of rotation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We found a moderate correlation between the NAP amplitude of the transferred branch and shoulder abduction strength at the end of the follow-up. The branch to the lateral head of the triceps was the most often selected as a donor. Outcomes were satisfactory in 14 out of 17 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings suggest that reinnervation is enhanced when the choice of the donor branch is individualized and based on functional metrics like NAP, instead of anatomical characteristics. The study supports the role of intraoperative nerve monitoring as an objective and predictable method to refine donor branch selection in radial to axillary nerve transfer.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100818"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144917635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Reported Outcomes from Supraclavicular Thoracic Outlet Decompression 锁骨上胸廓减压患者报告的结果
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100817
Kazimir R. Bagdady BS , Jacob A. Thayer MD , Jaclyn Bredenkamp , Brian A. Mailey MD

Purpose

The diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is based on patient history, provocative maneuvers, and, ultimately, the successful relief of symptoms following surgical decompression. We sought to understand patient-reported outcomes after thoracic outlet decompression.

Methods

All patients undergoing thoracic outlet decompression between July 2015 and July 2020 were identified from a single institutional database. Validated questionnaires including, Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Index, Short Form 20, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Zung Self-Reporting Depression Scale, and nine of our own questions, were used to report patient outcomes from 10 individuals.

Results

The Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Index, Zung Self-Reporting Depression Scale, Short Form 20 pain subscore, and PCS averages were 63 (± 44.3), 58.25 (± 5.04), 40.3 (± 17.5), and 22.6 (± 18.81), respectively. One hundred percent of patients indicated some level of depression with 50% indicating mild levels and 50% indicating moderate levels of depression. Pain was the most commonly reported improved symptom after surgery with 50% indicating a ≥95% improvement. Despite 80% of patients indicating surgery provided the results they were expecting, 60% still had some element of numbness in their arm or hand.

Conclusions

Thoracic outlet decompression can produce high levels of symptom improvement, especially in regards to pain. Lack of improvement can be related to a multitude of factors including confounding depression, pain catastrophizing/neurosis, inaccurate diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome, or double crush syndrome. More objective tests for identifying thoracic outlet syndrome may help to better understand which patients have a better likelihood of symptom improvement after surgery.

Type of study/level of evidence

Symptom Prevalence Study III.
目的神经源性胸廓出口综合征的诊断是基于患者的病史、刺激动作以及手术减压后症状的成功缓解。我们试图了解患者报告的胸廓出口减压后的结果。方法选取2015年7月至2020年7月间接受胸廓出口减压术的所有患者。经验证的问卷包括胸廓出口综合征指数、短表20、疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)、Zung自我报告抑郁量表和我们自己的9个问题,用于报告10名患者的结果。结果胸廓出口综合征指数、Zung自述抑郁量表、Short Form 20疼痛评分和PCS平均值分别为63(±44.3)、58.25(±5.04)、40.3(±17.5)和22.6(±18.81)。100%的患者表现出某种程度的抑郁,其中50%表现为轻度抑郁,50%表现为中度抑郁。疼痛是手术后最常见的改善症状,50%的患者表示改善≥95%。尽管80%的患者表示手术提供了他们预期的结果,但60%的患者仍然有手臂或手部麻木的情况。结论胸廓出口减压术能显著改善症状,尤其是疼痛症状。缺乏改善可能与多种因素有关,包括混杂性抑郁、疼痛灾难/神经症、胸廓出口综合征的不准确诊断或双重挤压综合征。更客观的测试来识别胸廓出口综合征可能有助于更好地了解哪些患者在手术后症状改善的可能性更大。研究类型/证据水平症状患病率研究III。
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes from Supraclavicular Thoracic Outlet Decompression","authors":"Kazimir R. Bagdady BS ,&nbsp;Jacob A. Thayer MD ,&nbsp;Jaclyn Bredenkamp ,&nbsp;Brian A. Mailey MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100817","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100817","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The diagnosis of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome is based on patient history, provocative maneuvers, and, ultimately, the successful relief of symptoms following surgical decompression. We sought to understand patient-reported outcomes after thoracic outlet decompression.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients undergoing thoracic outlet decompression between July 2015 and July 2020 were identified from a single institutional database. Validated questionnaires including, Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Index, Short Form 20, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Zung Self-Reporting Depression Scale, and nine of our own questions, were used to report patient outcomes from 10 individuals.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Index, Zung Self-Reporting Depression Scale, Short Form 20 pain subscore, and PCS averages were 63 (± 44.3), 58.25 (± 5.04), 40.3 (± 17.5), and 22.6 (± 18.81), respectively. One hundred percent of patients indicated some level of depression with 50% indicating mild levels and 50% indicating moderate levels of depression. Pain was the most commonly reported improved symptom after surgery with 50% indicating a ≥95% improvement. Despite 80% of patients indicating surgery provided the results they were expecting, 60% still had some element of numbness in their arm or hand.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Thoracic outlet decompression can produce high levels of symptom improvement, especially in regards to pain. Lack of improvement can be related to a multitude of factors including confounding depression, pain catastrophizing/neurosis, inaccurate diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome, or double crush syndrome. More objective tests for identifying thoracic outlet syndrome may help to better understand which patients have a better likelihood of symptom improvement after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Symptom Prevalence Study III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100817"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144896629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predicting Likelihood to Repeat Elective Hand Surgery with Early Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Scores: A Feasibility Study 预测早期手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾患者重复选择性手部手术的可能性:一项可行性研究
Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100813
Daniel A. London MD, MS , Avery M. Schroeder MD , Justin P. Chan MD , Orrin I. Franko MD

Purpose

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are collected after treatment to assess patient improvement. We sought to determine the postoperative timepoint at which changes in PROMs would best predict patients’ likelihood to repeat surgery and offer clinically relevant information.

Methods

Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores were collected during the course of care of 883 patients before undergoing elective outpatient hand surgery and at 5 postoperative timepoints. Likelihood to repeat surgery was collected 1 year after surgery, and patients were dichotomized into likely and unlikely to repeat surgery groups. Differences in the change in QuickDASH scores between groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used in conjunction with Youden’s index to determine the timepoints and cutoff levels at which likelihood to repeat surgery could be successfully predicted.

Results

In our cohort of 883 patients, 88.3% of patients indicated 1 year after surgery that they would be willing to repeat surgery. Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated that changes in QuickDASH scores at 3, 12, 24, and 52 weeks were all significantly associated with patient likelihood to repeat surgery. A change in QuickDASH score of 10.0 three weeks after surgery was the ideal cutoff point to identify an association of patient likelihood to repeat elective hand surgery 1 year after surgery.

Conclusions

Changes in QuickDASH scores as early as 3 weeks after surgery were associated with patient likelihood to repeat elective hand surgery 1 year after surgery. Although the heterogeneity of procedures included in the analyzed data pool precludes the complete generalizability of these findings to current clinical practice, it does support a feasible utility for early PROM collection in predicting patient satisfaction with their surgical outcome. This finding supports the continued, focused study of early PROMs, with potential for their employment in various clinical applications including real-time analysis for early postoperative intervention.

Type of Study/Level of Evidence

Therapeutic IIIb
目的:在治疗后收集患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)来评估患者的改善情况。我们试图确定术后时间点,在这个时间点,PROMs的变化可以最好地预测患者重复手术的可能性,并提供临床相关信息。方法收集883例门诊择期手部手术患者在护理过程中及术后5个时间点的臂、肩、手残疾快速评分(QuickDASH)。术后1年收集再次手术可能性,将患者分为可能和不可能再次手术组。使用Mann-Whitney U测试比较各组之间QuickDASH得分变化的差异。将受者工作特征曲线与约登指数结合使用,确定可以成功预测重复手术可能性的时间点和截止水平。结果在883例患者中,88.3%的患者在术后1年表示愿意再次手术。受试者操作特征分析表明,QuickDASH评分在3,12,24和52周时的变化都与患者重复手术的可能性显著相关。术后3周的QuickDASH评分变化为10.0,是确定患者术后1年重复择期手部手术可能性相关性的理想截断点。结论早在术后3周QuickDASH评分的变化与患者术后1年重复择期手部手术的可能性相关。虽然在分析的数据池中包含的手术的异质性排除了这些发现在当前临床实践中的完全推广,但它确实支持早期PROM收集在预测患者对手术结果满意度方面的可行效用。这一发现支持了对早期PROMs的持续、重点研究,并有可能将其应用于各种临床应用,包括早期术后干预的实时分析。研究类型/证据水平
{"title":"Predicting Likelihood to Repeat Elective Hand Surgery with Early Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Scores: A Feasibility Study","authors":"Daniel A. London MD, MS ,&nbsp;Avery M. Schroeder MD ,&nbsp;Justin P. Chan MD ,&nbsp;Orrin I. Franko MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100813","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.100813","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are collected after treatment to assess patient improvement. We sought to determine the postoperative timepoint at which changes in PROMs would best predict patients’ likelihood to repeat surgery and offer clinically relevant information.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (<em>Quick</em>DASH) scores were collected during the course of care of 883 patients before undergoing elective outpatient hand surgery and at 5 postoperative timepoints. Likelihood to repeat surgery was collected 1 year after surgery, and patients were dichotomized into likely and unlikely to repeat surgery groups. Differences in the change in <em>Quick</em>DASH scores between groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used in conjunction with Youden’s index to determine the timepoints and cutoff levels at which likelihood to repeat surgery could be successfully predicted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In our cohort of 883 patients, 88.3% of patients indicated 1 year after surgery that they would be willing to repeat surgery. Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated that changes in <em>Quick</em>DASH scores at 3, 12, 24, and 52 weeks were all significantly associated with patient likelihood to repeat surgery. A change in <em>Quick</em>DASH score of 10.0 three weeks after surgery was the ideal cutoff point to identify an association of patient likelihood to repeat elective hand surgery 1 year after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Changes in <em>Quick</em>DASH scores as early as 3 weeks after surgery were associated with patient likelihood to repeat elective hand surgery 1 year after surgery. Although the heterogeneity of procedures included in the analyzed data pool precludes the complete generalizability of these findings to current clinical practice, it does support a feasible utility for early PROM collection in predicting patient satisfaction with their surgical outcome. This finding supports the continued, focused study of early PROMs, with potential for their employment in various clinical applications including real-time analysis for early postoperative intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Type of Study/Level of Evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IIIb</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"7 6","pages":"Article 100813"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144896628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1