首页 > 最新文献

Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society最新文献

英文 中文
Test a Witness's Memory of a Suspect Only Once. 只测试一次证人对嫌疑犯的记忆。
1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1177/15291006211026259
John T Wixted, Gary L Wells, Elizabeth F Loftus, Brandon L Garrett

Eyewitness misidentifications are almost always made with high confidence in the courtroom. The courtroom is where eyewitnesses make their last identification of defendants suspected of (and charged with) committing a crime. But what did those same eyewitnesses do on the first identification test, conducted early in a police investigation? Despite testifying with high confidence in court, many eyewitnesses also testified that they had initially identified the suspect with low confidence or failed to identify the suspect at all. Presenting a lineup leaves the eyewitness with a memory trace of the faces in the lineup, including that of the suspect. As a result, the memory signal generated by the face of that suspect will be stronger on a later test involving the same witness, even if the suspect is innocent. In that sense, testing memory contaminates memory. These considerations underscore the importance of a newly proposed recommendation for conducting eyewitness identifications: Avoid repeated identification procedures with the same witness and suspect. This recommendation applies not only to additional tests conducted by police investigators but also to the final test conducted in the courtroom, in front of the judge and jury.

在法庭上,目击者的错误指认几乎总是充满信心的。法庭是目击证人对涉嫌(或被控)犯罪的被告进行最后鉴定的地方。但是,在警方调查的早期进行的第一次鉴定测试中,这些目击者做了什么?尽管在法庭上的证词可信度很高,但许多目击者也作证说,他们最初指认嫌疑人的可信度很低,或者根本没有指认出嫌疑人。指认指认会让目击者对指认中的人留下记忆痕迹,包括嫌疑人的脸。因此,在随后涉及同一证人的测试中,即使嫌疑人是无辜的,由该嫌疑人的脸产生的记忆信号也会更强。从这个意义上说,测试内存会污染内存。这些考虑强调了一项新近提出的关于进行目击者辨认的建议的重要性:避免对同一证人和嫌疑人进行重复辨认程序。这项建议不仅适用于警察调查人员进行的额外测试,也适用于在法庭上、在法官和陪审团面前进行的最后测试。
{"title":"Test a Witness's Memory of a Suspect Only Once.","authors":"John T Wixted,&nbsp;Gary L Wells,&nbsp;Elizabeth F Loftus,&nbsp;Brandon L Garrett","doi":"10.1177/15291006211026259","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006211026259","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eyewitness misidentifications are almost always made with high confidence in the courtroom. The courtroom is where eyewitnesses make their <i>last</i> identification of defendants suspected of (and charged with) committing a crime. But what did those same eyewitnesses do on the <i>first</i> identification test, conducted early in a police investigation? Despite testifying with high confidence in court, many eyewitnesses also testified that they had initially identified the suspect with low confidence or failed to identify the suspect at all. Presenting a lineup leaves the eyewitness with a memory trace of the faces in the lineup, including that of the suspect. As a result, the memory signal generated by the face of that suspect will be stronger on a later test involving the same witness, even if the suspect is innocent. In that sense, testing memory contaminates memory. These considerations underscore the importance of a newly proposed recommendation for conducting eyewitness identifications: <i>Avoid repeated identification procedures with the same witness and suspect</i>. This recommendation applies not only to additional tests conducted by police investigators but also to the final test conducted in the courtroom, in front of the judge and jury.</p>","PeriodicalId":37882,"journal":{"name":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39674423","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
The Practice of Visual Data Communication: What Works. 视觉数据交流的实践:什么是有效的。
1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1177/15291006211057899
Jonathan Schwabish
The practice of data visualization is both a science and an art. There is science behind how humans’ eyes and brains process visual content, and statistical methods behind collecting, processing, analyzing, and preparing data to generate graphs, charts, and diagrams. But the art of data visualization is how we bring people into the visual, how we engage them, and how we make them care about the content we are communicating to them. The target article of this commentary, the thorough work by Franconeri et al. (2021), sets the stage to understand the academic underpinnings of data visualization— how people’s eyes and brains facilitate the understanding of visual content, how to design perceptually efficient and understandable visualizations, and how people use different platforms and technologies to interact with data and visual content. The practice of data visualization goes further than many of these concepts to consider how data are plotted, how to use colors and fonts, and how to facilitate engagement and understanding. The standard graphs that many of us have come to know and create, such as line charts, bar charts, and pie charts, are familiar to most readers and easy to read. But many other graph types can be used to communicate ideas and arguments. In the “How to Design an Understandable Visualization” section of their article, Franconeri et al. briefly discuss four alternative graph types (or what I call nonstandard graph types): connected scatterplot, parallelcoordinates plot, tree map, and node-link diagram. There, the authors focus on how people in specific fields use specific graphs—for example, engineers and economists use connected scatterplots—not the potential for these formats to engage audiences on a broader level. In some cases, such nonstandard graph types can be inherently better at communicating data and in other cases are simply more engaging, which can be a goal in and of itself. Whether you are a researcher, analyst, marketer, or journalist, you know that the amount of content people see every day makes grabbing and maintaining attention difficult; thus, engagement can be a crucially important part of the data communicator’s toolkit. Here, I present several alternatives to the standard ways of visualizing and communicating a relatively simple data set from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). From my perspective, these alternative graphs are not so far outside the experience of most readers that they cannot be used more frequently— in the language of Franconeri et al., the “schema” in these graphs are well known and consist of dots, lines, and icons. The goal of this commentary is not to argue that the presented graphs are somehow the “best” that can be created with these data. Instead, my goal is to demonstrate the array of visual options we have to communicate data and how those options enable us to highlight different patterns or values, and to draw out our own stories for readers and help them reach co
{"title":"The Practice of Visual Data Communication: What Works.","authors":"Jonathan Schwabish","doi":"10.1177/15291006211057899","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006211057899","url":null,"abstract":"The practice of data visualization is both a science and an art. There is science behind how humans’ eyes and brains process visual content, and statistical methods behind collecting, processing, analyzing, and preparing data to generate graphs, charts, and diagrams. But the art of data visualization is how we bring people into the visual, how we engage them, and how we make them care about the content we are communicating to them. The target article of this commentary, the thorough work by Franconeri et al. (2021), sets the stage to understand the academic underpinnings of data visualization— how people’s eyes and brains facilitate the understanding of visual content, how to design perceptually efficient and understandable visualizations, and how people use different platforms and technologies to interact with data and visual content. The practice of data visualization goes further than many of these concepts to consider how data are plotted, how to use colors and fonts, and how to facilitate engagement and understanding. The standard graphs that many of us have come to know and create, such as line charts, bar charts, and pie charts, are familiar to most readers and easy to read. But many other graph types can be used to communicate ideas and arguments. In the “How to Design an Understandable Visualization” section of their article, Franconeri et al. briefly discuss four alternative graph types (or what I call nonstandard graph types): connected scatterplot, parallelcoordinates plot, tree map, and node-link diagram. There, the authors focus on how people in specific fields use specific graphs—for example, engineers and economists use connected scatterplots—not the potential for these formats to engage audiences on a broader level. In some cases, such nonstandard graph types can be inherently better at communicating data and in other cases are simply more engaging, which can be a goal in and of itself. Whether you are a researcher, analyst, marketer, or journalist, you know that the amount of content people see every day makes grabbing and maintaining attention difficult; thus, engagement can be a crucially important part of the data communicator’s toolkit. Here, I present several alternatives to the standard ways of visualizing and communicating a relatively simple data set from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). From my perspective, these alternative graphs are not so far outside the experience of most readers that they cannot be used more frequently— in the language of Franconeri et al., the “schema” in these graphs are well known and consist of dots, lines, and icons. The goal of this commentary is not to argue that the presented graphs are somehow the “best” that can be created with these data. Instead, my goal is to demonstrate the array of visual options we have to communicate data and how those options enable us to highlight different patterns or values, and to draw out our own stories for readers and help them reach co","PeriodicalId":37882,"journal":{"name":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39588146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Psychological Interventions for the Treatment of Chronic Pain in Adults. 成人慢性疼痛的心理干预治疗。
1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.1177/15291006211008157
Mary A Driscoll, Robert R Edwards, William C Becker, Ted J Kaptchuk, Robert D Kerns

The high prevalence and societal burden of chronic pain, its undertreatment, and disparities in its management have contributed to the acknowledgment of chronic pain as a serious public-health concern. The concurrent opioid epidemic, and increasing concern about overreliance on opioid therapy despite evidence of limited benefit and serious harms, has heightened attention to this problem. The biopsychosocial model has emerged as the primary conceptual framework for understanding the complex experience of chronic pain and for informing models of care. The prominence of psychological processes as risk and resilience factors in this model has prompted extensive study of psychological treatments designed to alter processes that underlie or significantly contribute to pain, distress, or disability among adults with chronic pain. Cognitive-behavioral therapy is acknowledged to have strong evidence of effectiveness; other psychological approaches, including acceptance and commitment therapy, mindfulness, biofeedback, hypnosis, and emotional-awareness and expression therapy, have also garnered varying degrees of evidence across multiple pain conditions. Mechanistic studies have identified multiple pathways by which these treatments may reduce the intensity and impact of pain. Despite the growing evidence for and appreciation of these approaches, several barriers limit their uptake at the level of organizations, providers, and patients. Innovative methods for delivering psychological interventions and other research, practice, and policy initiatives hold promise for overcoming these barriers. Additional scientific knowledge and practice gaps remain to be addressed to optimize the reach and effectiveness of these interventions, including tailoring to address individual differences, concurrently addressing co-occurring disorders, and incorporating other optimization strategies.

慢性疼痛的高患病率和社会负担、治疗不足和管理上的差异促使人们认识到慢性疼痛是一个严重的公共卫生问题。与此同时,阿片类药物的流行,以及对阿片类药物治疗过度依赖的日益关注,尽管有证据表明阿片类药物治疗的益处有限,危害严重,这提高了人们对这一问题的关注。生物-心理-社会模型已经成为理解慢性疼痛的复杂经验和告知护理模式的主要概念框架。在这个模型中,心理过程作为风险和恢复因素的突出地位促使人们对心理治疗进行了广泛的研究,这些治疗旨在改变慢性疼痛成人中导致疼痛、痛苦或残疾的基础或重要因素。认知行为疗法被认为是有效的有力证据;其他心理学方法,包括接受和承诺疗法、正念、生物反馈、催眠、情绪意识和表达疗法,也在多种疼痛条件下获得了不同程度的证据。机制研究已经确定了多种途径,通过这些治疗可以减少疼痛的强度和影响。尽管越来越多的证据支持和赞赏这些方法,一些障碍限制了它们在组织、提供者和患者层面的吸收。提供心理干预和其他研究、实践和政策举措的创新方法有望克服这些障碍。为了优化这些干预措施的覆盖范围和有效性,还需要解决更多的科学知识和实践差距,包括针对个体差异进行调整,同时解决共同发生的疾病,并纳入其他优化策略。
{"title":"Psychological Interventions for the Treatment of Chronic Pain in Adults.","authors":"Mary A Driscoll,&nbsp;Robert R Edwards,&nbsp;William C Becker,&nbsp;Ted J Kaptchuk,&nbsp;Robert D Kerns","doi":"10.1177/15291006211008157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006211008157","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The high prevalence and societal burden of chronic pain, its undertreatment, and disparities in its management have contributed to the acknowledgment of chronic pain as a serious public-health concern. The concurrent opioid epidemic, and increasing concern about overreliance on opioid therapy despite evidence of limited benefit and serious harms, has heightened attention to this problem. The biopsychosocial model has emerged as the primary conceptual framework for understanding the complex experience of chronic pain and for informing models of care. The prominence of psychological processes as risk and resilience factors in this model has prompted extensive study of psychological treatments designed to alter processes that underlie or significantly contribute to pain, distress, or disability among adults with chronic pain. Cognitive-behavioral therapy is acknowledged to have strong evidence of effectiveness; other psychological approaches, including acceptance and commitment therapy, mindfulness, biofeedback, hypnosis, and emotional-awareness and expression therapy, have also garnered varying degrees of evidence across multiple pain conditions. Mechanistic studies have identified multiple pathways by which these treatments may reduce the intensity and impact of pain. Despite the growing evidence for and appreciation of these approaches, several barriers limit their uptake at the level of organizations, providers, and patients. Innovative methods for delivering psychological interventions and other research, practice, and policy initiatives hold promise for overcoming these barriers. Additional scientific knowledge and practice gaps remain to be addressed to optimize the reach and effectiveness of these interventions, including tailoring to address individual differences, concurrently addressing co-occurring disorders, and incorporating other optimization strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":37882,"journal":{"name":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39431562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30
Psychological Treatment for Chronic Pain: Improving Access and Integration. 慢性疼痛的心理治疗:改善获取和整合。
1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI: 10.1177/15291006211033612
Beth D Darnall
{"title":"Psychological Treatment for Chronic Pain: Improving Access and Integration.","authors":"Beth D Darnall","doi":"10.1177/15291006211033612","DOIUrl":"10.1177/15291006211033612","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37882,"journal":{"name":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9970761/pdf/nihms-1872835.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9343409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Can We Make Active Learning Work in K-12 Education? Considering Prerequisites for a Successful Construction of Understanding. 如何让主动学习在K-12教育中发挥作用?考虑成功构建理解的先决条件。
1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI: 10.1177/1529100621997376
Garvin Brod
Active learning holds great promise for improving education, particularly in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Instead of receiving information passively, students take agency and actively construct their own understanding. A large meta-analysis has suggested that these features improve student performance in STEM (Freeman et al., 2014). Many instructional practices that promote active learning have the added benefit of making students familiar with the scientific process of testing theories via predictions and observations. Active learning could also contribute to reducing achievement gaps and empowering students from underrepresented groups to consider careers in science. It therefore seems paramount to synthesize a framework of active learning that guides research and practice in this field, and I applaud Lombardi and colleagues (this issue) for their interdisciplinary efforts to do so. Although the promises of active learning are wideranging, research on its merits has predominantly focused on undergraduate instruction. The meta-analysis by Freeman and colleagues (2014) focused exclusively on undergraduates, and so does the synthesis by Lombardi and colleagues. Does active learning work equally well for younger students, from kindergarten to 12th grade (K–12)? Or are there prerequisites for benefiting from active learning that younger students do not yet meet? And can the construction-of-understanding ecosystem proposed by Lombardi and colleagues inform research and practice in K–12 education as well? Answers to these questions are important for improving scientific literacy in society at large. Attempting to close achievement gaps at earlier ages is more effective and has higher returns than doing so later (Heckman, 2006). Furthermore, bringing active-learning practices into K–12 education could facilitate the transition to such practices at the undergraduate level. Currently, active-learning methods are often less popular among first-year undergraduate students than among more advanced undergraduates who have more experience with these methods (Zinski et al., 2017). Therefore, in the following, I attempt to provide some answers, acknowledging that these are preliminary and subject to future research that will hopefully be sparked by the construction-of-understanding ecosystem framework. Leaning on the synthetic definition offered by Lombardi and colleagues, I use active-learning practices as an umbrella term for instructional activities that are intended to afford students agency over their learning and that foster active construction of understanding. Do active-learning practices work as well in K–12 education as in undergraduate instruction? This question turns out to be surprisingly difficult to answer. A first difficulty is terminology. Most research that has dealt with active-learning practices in K–12 education has placed them under the umbrella term inquiry-based teaching/learning, which spans even wider than
{"title":"How Can We Make Active Learning Work in K-12 Education? Considering Prerequisites for a Successful Construction of Understanding.","authors":"Garvin Brod","doi":"10.1177/1529100621997376","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100621997376","url":null,"abstract":"Active learning holds great promise for improving education, particularly in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Instead of receiving information passively, students take agency and actively construct their own understanding. A large meta-analysis has suggested that these features improve student performance in STEM (Freeman et al., 2014). Many instructional practices that promote active learning have the added benefit of making students familiar with the scientific process of testing theories via predictions and observations. Active learning could also contribute to reducing achievement gaps and empowering students from underrepresented groups to consider careers in science. It therefore seems paramount to synthesize a framework of active learning that guides research and practice in this field, and I applaud Lombardi and colleagues (this issue) for their interdisciplinary efforts to do so. Although the promises of active learning are wideranging, research on its merits has predominantly focused on undergraduate instruction. The meta-analysis by Freeman and colleagues (2014) focused exclusively on undergraduates, and so does the synthesis by Lombardi and colleagues. Does active learning work equally well for younger students, from kindergarten to 12th grade (K–12)? Or are there prerequisites for benefiting from active learning that younger students do not yet meet? And can the construction-of-understanding ecosystem proposed by Lombardi and colleagues inform research and practice in K–12 education as well? Answers to these questions are important for improving scientific literacy in society at large. Attempting to close achievement gaps at earlier ages is more effective and has higher returns than doing so later (Heckman, 2006). Furthermore, bringing active-learning practices into K–12 education could facilitate the transition to such practices at the undergraduate level. Currently, active-learning methods are often less popular among first-year undergraduate students than among more advanced undergraduates who have more experience with these methods (Zinski et al., 2017). Therefore, in the following, I attempt to provide some answers, acknowledging that these are preliminary and subject to future research that will hopefully be sparked by the construction-of-understanding ecosystem framework. Leaning on the synthetic definition offered by Lombardi and colleagues, I use active-learning practices as an umbrella term for instructional activities that are intended to afford students agency over their learning and that foster active construction of understanding. Do active-learning practices work as well in K–12 education as in undergraduate instruction? This question turns out to be surprisingly difficult to answer. A first difficulty is terminology. Most research that has dealt with active-learning practices in K–12 education has placed them under the umbrella term inquiry-based teaching/learning, which spans even wider than ","PeriodicalId":37882,"journal":{"name":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100621997376","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38887020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Citizens Versus the Internet: Confronting Digital Challenges With Cognitive Tools. 公民与互联网:用认知工具面对数字挑战。
1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1177/1529100620946707
Anastasia Kozyreva, Stephan Lewandowsky, Ralph Hertwig

The Internet has evolved into a ubiquitous and indispensable digital environment in which people communicate, seek information, and make decisions. Despite offering various benefits, online environments are also replete with smart, highly adaptive choice architectures designed primarily to maximize commercial interests, capture and sustain users' attention, monetize user data, and predict and influence future behavior. This online landscape holds multiple negative consequences for society, such as a decline in human autonomy, rising incivility in online conversation, the facilitation of political extremism, and the spread of disinformation. Benevolent choice architects working with regulators may curb the worst excesses of manipulative choice architectures, yet the strategic advantages, resources, and data remain with commercial players. One way to address some of this imbalance is with interventions that empower Internet users to gain some control over their digital environments, in part by boosting their information literacy and their cognitive resistance to manipulation. Our goal is to present a conceptual map of interventions that are based on insights from psychological science. We begin by systematically outlining how online and offline environments differ despite being increasingly inextricable. We then identify four major types of challenges that users encounter in online environments: persuasive and manipulative choice architectures, AI-assisted information architectures, false and misleading information, and distracting environments. Next, we turn to how psychological science can inform interventions to counteract these challenges of the digital world. After distinguishing among three types of behavioral and cognitive interventions-nudges, technocognition, and boosts-we focus on boosts, of which we identify two main groups: (a) those aimed at enhancing people's agency in their digital environments (e.g., self-nudging, deliberate ignorance) and (b) those aimed at boosting competencies of reasoning and resilience to manipulation (e.g., simple decision aids, inoculation). These cognitive tools are designed to foster the civility of online discourse and protect reason and human autonomy against manipulative choice architectures, attention-grabbing techniques, and the spread of false information.

互联网已经发展成为一个无处不在的、不可或缺的数字环境,人们在其中交流、寻求信息和做出决策。尽管提供了各种各样的好处,在线环境也充满了智能,高度自适应的选择架构,其设计主要是为了最大化商业利益,捕获和维持用户的注意力,将用户数据货币化,并预测和影响未来的行为。这种网络环境对社会产生了多重负面影响,例如人类自主性的下降,在线对话中不文明行为的增加,政治极端主义的便利以及虚假信息的传播。仁慈的选择架构师与监管机构合作,可能会遏制最糟糕的过度操纵选择架构,但战略优势、资源和数据仍然属于商业参与者。解决这种不平衡的一种方法是通过干预,让互联网用户对他们的数字环境有一定的控制权,部分是通过提高他们的信息素养和对操纵的认知抵抗力。我们的目标是提出一个基于心理科学见解的干预措施的概念图。我们首先系统地概述在线和离线环境的不同,尽管它们越来越密不可分。然后,我们确定了用户在在线环境中遇到的四种主要挑战类型:说服性和操纵性选择架构、人工智能辅助信息架构、虚假和误导性信息以及分散注意力的环境。接下来,我们转向心理科学如何为干预措施提供信息,以应对数字世界的这些挑战。在区分了三种类型的行为和认知干预——助推、技术认知和助推之后,我们将重点放在助推上,其中我们确定了两个主要群体:(a)旨在增强人们在数字环境中的能动性(例如,自我助推、故意无知)和(b)旨在提高推理能力和对操纵的适应能力(例如,简单的决策辅助、接种)。这些认知工具的目的是促进在线话语的文明,保护理性和人类的自主权,防止操纵选择架构、吸引注意力的技术和虚假信息的传播。
{"title":"Citizens Versus the Internet: Confronting Digital Challenges With Cognitive Tools.","authors":"Anastasia Kozyreva, Stephan Lewandowsky, Ralph Hertwig","doi":"10.1177/1529100620946707","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1529100620946707","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Internet has evolved into a ubiquitous and indispensable digital environment in which people communicate, seek information, and make decisions. Despite offering various benefits, online environments are also replete with smart, highly adaptive choice architectures designed primarily to maximize commercial interests, capture and sustain users' attention, monetize user data, and predict and influence future behavior. This online landscape holds multiple negative consequences for society, such as a decline in human autonomy, rising incivility in online conversation, the facilitation of political extremism, and the spread of disinformation. Benevolent choice architects working with regulators may curb the worst excesses of manipulative choice architectures, yet the strategic advantages, resources, and data remain with commercial players. One way to address some of this imbalance is with interventions that empower Internet users to gain some control over their digital environments, in part by boosting their information literacy and their cognitive resistance to manipulation. Our goal is to present a conceptual map of interventions that are based on insights from psychological science. We begin by systematically outlining how online and offline environments differ despite being increasingly inextricable. We then identify four major types of challenges that users encounter in online environments: persuasive and manipulative choice architectures, AI-assisted information architectures, false and misleading information, and distracting environments. Next, we turn to how psychological science can inform interventions to counteract these challenges of the digital world. After distinguishing among three types of behavioral and cognitive interventions-nudges, technocognition, and boosts-we focus on boosts, of which we identify two main groups: (a) those aimed at enhancing people's agency in their digital environments (e.g., self-nudging, deliberate ignorance) and (b) those aimed at boosting competencies of reasoning and resilience to manipulation (e.g., simple decision aids, inoculation). These cognitive tools are designed to foster the civility of online discourse and protect reason and human autonomy against manipulative choice architectures, attention-grabbing techniques, and the spread of false information.</p>","PeriodicalId":37882,"journal":{"name":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100620946707","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38715065","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 145
Recognizing the Role of Psychological Science in Improving Online Spaces. 认识到心理科学在改善网络空间中的作用。
1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1177/1529100620972100
Lisa K Fazio
In their review, Kozyreva, Lewandowsky, and Hertwig (this issue; p. 103) provide an excellent overview of our current online environment, the challenges inherent in the current system, and how psychological science can help confront these challenges. In this commentary, I aim to highlight some of their important points and outline a few areas of disagreement. Before I do so, I think it is important to situate myself and my perspective. I am a cognitive and developmental psychologist who studies memory and how people of all ages learn true and false information. The review by Kozyreva et al. touches on many aspects of the online ecosystem, but I will be focusing on the areas that overlap with my expertise.
{"title":"Recognizing the Role of Psychological Science in Improving Online Spaces.","authors":"Lisa K Fazio","doi":"10.1177/1529100620972100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620972100","url":null,"abstract":"In their review, Kozyreva, Lewandowsky, and Hertwig (this issue; p. 103) provide an excellent overview of our current online environment, the challenges inherent in the current system, and how psychological science can help confront these challenges. In this commentary, I aim to highlight some of their important points and outline a few areas of disagreement. Before I do so, I think it is important to situate myself and my perspective. I am a cognitive and developmental psychologist who studies memory and how people of all ages learn true and false information. The review by Kozyreva et al. touches on many aspects of the online ecosystem, but I will be focusing on the areas that overlap with my expertise.","PeriodicalId":37882,"journal":{"name":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100620972100","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38378269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Persistence and Fade-Out of Educational-Intervention Effects: Mechanisms and Potential Solutions. 教育干预效应的持续与消退:机制与可能的解决方案。
1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2020-10-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-14 DOI: 10.1177/1529100620915848
Drew H Bailey, Greg J Duncan, Flávio Cunha, Barbara R Foorman, David S Yeager

Some environmental influences, including intentional interventions, have shown persistent effects on psychological characteristics and other socially important outcomes years and even decades later. At the same time, it is common to find that the effects of life events or interventions diminish and even disappear completely, a phenomenon known as fadeout. We review the evidence for persistence and fadeout, drawing primarily on evidence from educational interventions. We conclude that 1) fadeout is widespread, and often co-exists with persistence; 2) fadeout is a substantive phenomenon, not merely a measurement artefact; and 3) persistence depends on the types of skills targeted, the institutional constraints and opportunities within the social context, and complementarities between interventions and subsequent environmental affordances. We discuss the implications of these conclusions for research and policy.

一些环境影响,包括有意干预,在数年甚至数十年后对心理特征和其他重要的社会结果显示出持续的影响。与此同时,生活事件或干预的影响减弱甚至完全消失是很常见的,这种现象被称为“消退”。我们回顾了持续性和消退的证据,主要来自教育干预的证据。我们得出的结论是:1)消退是普遍存在的,并且常常与持久性共存;2)衰落是一种实质性的现象,而不仅仅是一种测量伪影;3)持久性取决于所针对的技能类型、社会背景下的制度限制和机会,以及干预措施与随后的环境支持之间的互补性。我们将讨论这些结论对研究和政策的影响。
{"title":"Persistence and Fade-Out of Educational-Intervention Effects: Mechanisms and Potential Solutions.","authors":"Drew H Bailey, Greg J Duncan, Flávio Cunha, Barbara R Foorman, David S Yeager","doi":"10.1177/1529100620915848","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1529100620915848","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some environmental influences, including intentional interventions, have shown persistent effects on psychological characteristics and other socially important outcomes years and even decades later. At the same time, it is common to find that the effects of life events or interventions diminish and even disappear completely, a phenomenon known as <i>fadeout</i>. We review the evidence for persistence and fadeout, drawing primarily on evidence from educational interventions. We conclude that 1) fadeout is widespread, and often co-exists with persistence; 2) fadeout is a substantive phenomenon, not merely a measurement artefact; and 3) persistence depends on the types of skills targeted, the institutional constraints and opportunities within the social context, and complementarities between interventions and subsequent environmental affordances. We discuss the implications of these conclusions for research and policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":37882,"journal":{"name":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7787577/pdf/nihms-1588789.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38794128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Education and Cognitive Functioning Across the Life Span. 终身教育与认知功能。
1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI: 10.1177/1529100620920576
Martin Lövdén, Laura Fratiglioni, M Maria Glymour, Ulman Lindenberger, Elliot M Tucker-Drob

Cognitive abilities are important predictors of educational and occupational performance, socioeconomic attainment, health, and longevity. Declines in cognitive abilities are linked to impairments in older adults' everyday functions, but people differ from one another in their rates of cognitive decline over the course of adulthood and old age. Hence, identifying factors that protect against compromised late-life cognition is of great societal interest. The number of years of formal education completed by individuals is positively correlated with their cognitive function throughout adulthood and predicts lower risk of dementia late in life. These observations have led to the propositions that prolonging education might (a) affect cognitive ability and (b) attenuate aging-associated declines in cognition. We evaluate these propositions by reviewing the literature on educational attainment and cognitive aging, including recent analyses of data harmonized across multiple longitudinal cohort studies and related meta-analyses. In line with the first proposition, the evidence indicates that educational attainment has positive effects on cognitive function. We also find evidence that cognitive abilities are associated with selection into longer durations of education and that there are common factors (e.g., parental socioeconomic resources) that affect both educational attainment and cognitive development. There is likely reciprocal interplay among these factors, and among cognitive abilities, during development. Education-cognitive ability associations are apparent across the entire adult life span and across the full range of education levels, including (to some degree) tertiary education. However, contrary to the second proposition, we find that associations between education and aging-associated cognitive declines are negligible and that a threshold model of dementia can account for the association between educational attainment and late-life dementia risk. We conclude that educational attainment exerts its influences on late-life cognitive function primarily by contributing to individual differences in cognitive skills that emerge in early adulthood but persist into older age. We also note that the widespread absence of educational influences on rates of cognitive decline puts constraints on theoretical notions of cognitive aging, such as the concepts of cognitive reserve and brain maintenance. Improving the conditions that shape development during the first decades of life carries great potential for improving cognitive ability in early adulthood and for reducing public-health burdens related to cognitive aging and dementia.

认知能力是教育和职业表现、社会经济地位、健康和长寿的重要预测因素。认知能力的下降与老年人日常功能的损害有关,但人们在成年期和老年期认知能力下降的速度各不相同。因此,找出防止晚年认知能力受损的因素具有重大的社会意义。个人完成正规教育的年数与其整个成年期的认知功能呈正相关,并预示着晚年患痴呆症的风险较低。这些观察结果提出了延长受教育时间可能(a)影响认知能力和(b)减轻与衰老相关的认知能力下降的命题。我们通过回顾有关教育程度和认知衰老的文献,包括最近对多项纵向队列研究和相关荟萃分析的统一数据分析,对这些命题进行了评估。根据第一个命题,有证据表明受教育程度对认知功能有积极影响。我们还发现有证据表明,认知能力与选择接受较长时间的教育有关,而且有一些共同因素(如父母的社会经济资源)会影响受教育程度和认知发展。在发展过程中,这些因素之间以及认知能力之间可能存在相互影响。教育与认知能力之间的关联在整个成人生命周期和各种教育水平(包括(在某种程度上)高等教育)中都是显而易见的。然而,与第二个命题相反,我们发现教育与衰老相关的认知能力下降之间的关联微乎其微,而且痴呆症的阈值模型可以解释教育程度与晚年痴呆症风险之间的关联。我们的结论是,受教育程度对晚年认知功能的影响主要是通过造成认知技能的个体差异来实现的,这种差异在成年早期出现,但一直持续到老年。我们还注意到,教育程度对认知功能衰退率的影响普遍缺失,这对认知衰老的理论概念,如认知储备和大脑维持的概念,造成了限制。改善生命最初几十年的发展条件,对于提高成年早期的认知能力、减少与认知老化和痴呆症相关的公共卫生负担具有巨大的潜力。
{"title":"Education and Cognitive Functioning Across the Life Span.","authors":"Martin Lövdén, Laura Fratiglioni, M Maria Glymour, Ulman Lindenberger, Elliot M Tucker-Drob","doi":"10.1177/1529100620920576","DOIUrl":"10.1177/1529100620920576","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive abilities are important predictors of educational and occupational performance, socioeconomic attainment, health, and longevity. Declines in cognitive abilities are linked to impairments in older adults' everyday functions, but people differ from one another in their rates of cognitive decline over the course of adulthood and old age. Hence, identifying factors that protect against compromised late-life cognition is of great societal interest. The number of years of formal education completed by individuals is positively correlated with their cognitive function throughout adulthood and predicts lower risk of dementia late in life. These observations have led to the propositions that prolonging education might (a) affect cognitive ability and (b) attenuate aging-associated declines in cognition. We evaluate these propositions by reviewing the literature on educational attainment and cognitive aging, including recent analyses of data harmonized across multiple longitudinal cohort studies and related meta-analyses. In line with the first proposition, the evidence indicates that educational attainment has positive effects on cognitive function. We also find evidence that cognitive abilities are associated with selection into longer durations of education and that there are common factors (e.g., parental socioeconomic resources) that affect both educational attainment and cognitive development. There is likely reciprocal interplay among these factors, and among cognitive abilities, during development. Education-cognitive ability associations are apparent across the entire adult life span and across the full range of education levels, including (to some degree) tertiary education. However, contrary to the second proposition, we find that associations between education and aging-associated cognitive declines are negligible and that a threshold model of dementia can account for the association between educational attainment and late-life dementia risk. We conclude that educational attainment exerts its influences on late-life cognitive function primarily by contributing to individual differences in cognitive skills that emerge in early adulthood but persist into older age. We also note that the widespread absence of educational influences on rates of cognitive decline puts constraints on theoretical notions of cognitive aging, such as the concepts of cognitive reserve and brain maintenance. Improving the conditions that shape development during the first decades of life carries great potential for improving cognitive ability in early adulthood and for reducing public-health burdens related to cognitive aging and dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":37882,"journal":{"name":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425377/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38254352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How Do Cognitively Stimulating Activities Affect Cognition and the Brain Throughout Life? 认知刺激活动如何影响认知和大脑的一生?
1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI: 10.1177/1529100620941808
Mara Mather
{"title":"How Do Cognitively Stimulating Activities Affect Cognition and the Brain Throughout Life?","authors":"Mara Mather","doi":"10.1177/1529100620941808","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620941808","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37882,"journal":{"name":"Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1529100620941808","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38254349","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
期刊
Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1