首页 > 最新文献

NORMA最新文献

英文 中文
Engaged fatherhood for men, families and gender equality: healthcare, social policy, and work perspectives 从事父亲工作的男子、家庭和性别平等:保健、社会政策和工作前景
IF 2.1 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-11-16 DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2022.2147758
Charlotte N. Hoppen
{"title":"Engaged fatherhood for men, families and gender equality: healthcare, social policy, and work perspectives","authors":"Charlotte N. Hoppen","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2022.2147758","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2022.2147758","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48050740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Changing men and masculinities: a reply to Roberts, Elliott and Ralph 改变中的男人和男子气概:对罗伯茨、艾略特和拉尔夫的回应
IF 2.1 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2022.2139522
Andrea Christofidou
ABSTRACT In this short article I provide a response to Steven Roberts, Karla Elliott and Brittany Ralph’s reply to my recently published article, Men and masculinities: a continuing debate on change. I address Roberts, Elliott and Ralph’s critique over the limitations of comparing the frameworks of inclusive and hybrid masculinities, and I respond to their claims over the use of intersectionality to account for the lack of change among less privileged men. Throughout the article I highlight the need for analysing men and masculinities in relation to wider systems of inequality and power hierarchies between men and women on the one hand, and among men on the other. I also keep insisting that research on changing men and masculinities should rely on intersectional, multi-layered analyses that take into careful consideration the contextual, interactional and situational factors that may affect men’s practices and (re)constructions of masculinity.
在这篇短文中,我对史蒂文·罗伯茨、卡拉·艾略特和布列塔尼·拉尔夫对我最近发表的文章《男人和男子气概:关于变革的持续辩论》的回复做出了回应。我回应罗伯茨、艾略特和拉尔夫对比较包容性和混合型男性气质框架的局限性的批评,并回应他们关于使用交叉性来解释弱势男性缺乏变化的主张。在整篇文章中,我强调有必要分析男性和男性气质与更广泛的不平等和权力等级制度的关系,一方面是男女之间,另一方面是男性之间。我还坚持认为,关于男性和男子气概变化的研究应该依赖交叉的、多层次的分析,仔细考虑可能影响男性行为和(重新)建构男子气概的背景、相互作用和情境因素。
{"title":"Changing men and masculinities: a reply to Roberts, Elliott and Ralph","authors":"Andrea Christofidou","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2022.2139522","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2022.2139522","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this short article I provide a response to Steven Roberts, Karla Elliott and Brittany Ralph’s reply to my recently published article, Men and masculinities: a continuing debate on change. I address Roberts, Elliott and Ralph’s critique over the limitations of comparing the frameworks of inclusive and hybrid masculinities, and I respond to their claims over the use of intersectionality to account for the lack of change among less privileged men. Throughout the article I highlight the need for analysing men and masculinities in relation to wider systems of inequality and power hierarchies between men and women on the one hand, and among men on the other. I also keep insisting that research on changing men and masculinities should rely on intersectional, multi-layered analyses that take into careful consideration the contextual, interactional and situational factors that may affect men’s practices and (re)constructions of masculinity.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"18 1","pages":"65 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43152679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Changing men, changing masculinities 改变男人,改变男子气概
IF 2.1 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2022.2133819
Sam de Boise
When it comes to academic literature, a cursory survey of titles reveals that one constant in discussions of men and masculinities is change. Segal’s (1993) Slow Motion: Changing Men, Changing Masculinities was already raising the issue of change in relation to men and masculinities over thirty years ago. Interest in the subject, however has intensified since the early 2000s, with hooks’ (2004) The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity and Love, Hidaka’s (2010) Salaryman Masculinity: Continuity and Change in Hegemonic Masculinity in Japan, Seidler’s (2006) Transforming Masculinities, Roberts’ (2013) Young Working-Class Men in Transition as well as his (2015) edited Debating Modern Masculinities: Change, Continuity, Crisis?, Anderson’s (2009) Inclusive Masculinity: The Changing Nature of Masculinities, and, recently, Luyt and Starck’s (2022) Masculine Power and Gender Equality: Masculinities as Change Agents to name just a few. Even before this organisations such as Achilles Heel in the UK (see Seidler, 1991) and the women’s liberation movement (see, for instance, Hanisch, 1969) were foregrounding the issue as important. Articles in recent issues of NORMA, too, have focused on the question of ‘newer’ forms of masculinity as well as central questions around what change is desirable and possible (Christofidou, 2021; Roberts, Elliott, & Ralph, 2021; Wolfman, Hearn, & Yeadon-Lee, 2021). The number of articles which deal with the issue of changes in the performance and charactertisation of masculinity and the position and performances of men, are innumerably larger (see, for example, Duncanson, 2015; Ratele, 2014; Ratele, 2015; Segal, 1993) and expanding this out to even those which do not include change in the title, the corpus of literature becomes unmanageable. There are essentially three aspects to this debate, revolving around theoretical, ethical and empirical considerations. The first concerns theories around if and why men change. CSMM, via Connell, has been indebted to a specific idea of hegemony, rooted in Gramscian notions of culture as something which is flexible and related to, but to a certain extent independent of, economic forces. Whilst Marx was notoriously economist in his approach to culture, Gramsci’s (1971) revisions emphasised the independence of the so-called superstructure from the base, observing that culture could shape political influence and subsequently economic power rather than simply the reverse. For Connell, the promise of hegemony for theorising change was one of the key dynamics which hegemony offered over sex role theory which failed to grapple with the question (Demetriou, 2001, p. 339). Connell notes specifically that “I stress that hegemonic masculinity embodies ‘a currently accepted strategy’. When conditions for the defence of patriarchy change, the bases of dominance of a particular masculinity are eroded...Hegemony then, is a historically mobile relation” (Connell, 1995, 77 emphasis added). Alongside these more str
说到学术文献,对标题的粗略调查显示,关于男性和男子气概的讨论中有一个不变的主题是变化。西格尔(1993)的《慢动作:改变男人,改变男子气概》在三十多年前就已经提出了与男人和男子气概有关的变化问题。然而,自21世纪初以来,人们对这一主题的兴趣有所增强,包括胡克斯(2004年)的《改变的意志:男人、男子气概和爱情》、Hidaka(2010年)的《工薪族男子气概:日本霸权男子气概的延续和变化》、塞德勒(2006年)的《转变中的男子气概》、罗伯茨(2013年)的《转型中的年轻工人阶级男性》,以及他(2015年)编辑的《辩论现代男子气概:变化、连续性、危机?》安德森(2009)的《包容性男子气概:男子气概的变化本质》,以及最近的Luyt和Starck(2022)的《男性权力和性别平等:作为变革推动者的男子气概》等等。甚至在此之前,英国的“阿喀琉斯之踵”(见Seidler, 1991)和妇女解放运动(见Hanisch,例如,1969)等组织就把这个问题列为重要议题。《NORMA》最近几期的文章也关注了“新”形式的男性气质问题,以及围绕什么样的变化是可取的和可能的核心问题(Christofidou, 2021;Roberts, Elliott, & Ralph, 2021;Wolfman, Hearn, & Yeadon-Lee, 2021)。处理男性气质的表现和特征以及男性的地位和表现变化问题的文章数量要大得多(例如,见Duncanson, 2015;Ratele, 2014;Ratele, 2015;Segal, 1993),并将其扩展到甚至不包括标题变化的那些,文学语料库变得难以管理。这场辩论基本上有三个方面,围绕着理论、伦理和经验考虑。第一个是关于男人是否会改变以及为什么会改变的理论。通过康奈尔,CSMM得益于一种特定的霸权思想,这种霸权思想根植于葛兰西的文化观念,即文化是灵活的,与经济力量相关,但在一定程度上独立于经济力量。虽然马克思在文化研究方面是出了名的经济学家,但葛兰西(1971)的修正强调了所谓的上层建筑与基础的独立性,观察到文化可以塑造政治影响,进而塑造经济力量,而不是简单地相反。对于康奈尔来说,霸权对理论化变革的承诺是霸权提供的关键动力之一,而性别角色理论未能解决这个问题(Demetriou, 2001, p. 339)。康奈尔特别指出:“我强调,霸道的男性气概体现了‘一种目前被接受的策略’。当捍卫父权制的条件发生变化时,特定男子气概的统治基础就会受到侵蚀……因此,霸权是一种历史上流动的关系”(Connell, 1995,77)。当然,除了这些更具结构性的方法之外,后结构主义对性别和身份的批评,更广泛地说,是可塑的和流动的,强调性别的概念是不断变化的,在背景下是可变的,并且随着时间而变化(例如Beasley, 2008;Butler, 1997,2008;直到,1998;West & Zimmerman, 1987)。这表明,变化本身,是性别和社会更普遍的事实状态。还有一个问题是,变化从何而来,哪些人被认为发生了变化。埃利奥特(2020)和罗伯茨(2015)认为,变化几乎总是被假定为
{"title":"Changing men, changing masculinities","authors":"Sam de Boise","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2022.2133819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2022.2133819","url":null,"abstract":"When it comes to academic literature, a cursory survey of titles reveals that one constant in discussions of men and masculinities is change. Segal’s (1993) Slow Motion: Changing Men, Changing Masculinities was already raising the issue of change in relation to men and masculinities over thirty years ago. Interest in the subject, however has intensified since the early 2000s, with hooks’ (2004) The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity and Love, Hidaka’s (2010) Salaryman Masculinity: Continuity and Change in Hegemonic Masculinity in Japan, Seidler’s (2006) Transforming Masculinities, Roberts’ (2013) Young Working-Class Men in Transition as well as his (2015) edited Debating Modern Masculinities: Change, Continuity, Crisis?, Anderson’s (2009) Inclusive Masculinity: The Changing Nature of Masculinities, and, recently, Luyt and Starck’s (2022) Masculine Power and Gender Equality: Masculinities as Change Agents to name just a few. Even before this organisations such as Achilles Heel in the UK (see Seidler, 1991) and the women’s liberation movement (see, for instance, Hanisch, 1969) were foregrounding the issue as important. Articles in recent issues of NORMA, too, have focused on the question of ‘newer’ forms of masculinity as well as central questions around what change is desirable and possible (Christofidou, 2021; Roberts, Elliott, & Ralph, 2021; Wolfman, Hearn, & Yeadon-Lee, 2021). The number of articles which deal with the issue of changes in the performance and charactertisation of masculinity and the position and performances of men, are innumerably larger (see, for example, Duncanson, 2015; Ratele, 2014; Ratele, 2015; Segal, 1993) and expanding this out to even those which do not include change in the title, the corpus of literature becomes unmanageable. There are essentially three aspects to this debate, revolving around theoretical, ethical and empirical considerations. The first concerns theories around if and why men change. CSMM, via Connell, has been indebted to a specific idea of hegemony, rooted in Gramscian notions of culture as something which is flexible and related to, but to a certain extent independent of, economic forces. Whilst Marx was notoriously economist in his approach to culture, Gramsci’s (1971) revisions emphasised the independence of the so-called superstructure from the base, observing that culture could shape political influence and subsequently economic power rather than simply the reverse. For Connell, the promise of hegemony for theorising change was one of the key dynamics which hegemony offered over sex role theory which failed to grapple with the question (Demetriou, 2001, p. 339). Connell notes specifically that “I stress that hegemonic masculinity embodies ‘a currently accepted strategy’. When conditions for the defence of patriarchy change, the bases of dominance of a particular masculinity are eroded...Hegemony then, is a historically mobile relation” (Connell, 1995, 77 emphasis added). Alongside these more str","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"17 1","pages":"213 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42048614","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hypogonadism. Diagnosis, masculinity, and capital in narratives about testosterone deficiency 性腺机能减退。诊断,阳刚之气和资本在睾酮缺乏的叙述
IF 2.1 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2022.2121534
L. Berg, Ida Linander
ABSTRACT For centuries, male hypogonadism has been defined as a clinical syndrome caused by the inability to produce physiological concentrations of testosterone and/or normal amount of sperm. In 2020, an information campaign started in Sweden with the ambition of increasing knowledge about hypogonadism and (lack of) testosterone, targeting both men and healthcare providers. In this study, we take a closer look at media discussions in Sweden on hypogonadism over the period 2018–2021. Through feminist thinking on biomedicalisation, we analyse the media material about the phenomena and issues being raised regarding masculinity, age and health in contemporary neoliberal and biocapital times. For some people, hypogonadism is a severe condition, but we can also see that the diagnosis becomes a response to a wide range of symptoms, expanding the realm for diagnostic practices and tying into normative ideas about age, time and lacking or fading masculinity. The media narratives about hypogonadism not only reflect cultural norms regarding masculinity and the plasticity of diagnoses but also create desires, needs and markets.
几个世纪以来,男性性腺功能减退一直被定义为一种临床综合征,由无法产生生理浓度的睾丸激素和/或正常数量的精子引起。2020年,瑞典启动了一项信息宣传活动,旨在提高对性腺功能减退和睾丸激素(缺乏)的认识,目标人群包括男性和医疗保健提供者。在这项研究中,我们仔细研究了瑞典媒体在2018-2021年期间对性腺功能减退症的讨论。通过对生物医学化的女性主义思考,我们分析了在当代新自由主义和生物资本时代,关于男性、年龄和健康的现象和问题的媒体材料。对一些人来说,性腺功能减退症是一种严重的疾病,但我们也可以看到,诊断是对一系列症状的反应,扩大了诊断实践的领域,并与年龄、时间和缺乏或消退的男性气概的规范观念联系在一起。关于性腺功能减退的媒体叙述不仅反映了关于男性气质的文化规范和诊断的可塑性,而且创造了欲望、需求和市场。
{"title":"Hypogonadism. Diagnosis, masculinity, and capital in narratives about testosterone deficiency","authors":"L. Berg, Ida Linander","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2022.2121534","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2022.2121534","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT For centuries, male hypogonadism has been defined as a clinical syndrome caused by the inability to produce physiological concentrations of testosterone and/or normal amount of sperm. In 2020, an information campaign started in Sweden with the ambition of increasing knowledge about hypogonadism and (lack of) testosterone, targeting both men and healthcare providers. In this study, we take a closer look at media discussions in Sweden on hypogonadism over the period 2018–2021. Through feminist thinking on biomedicalisation, we analyse the media material about the phenomena and issues being raised regarding masculinity, age and health in contemporary neoliberal and biocapital times. For some people, hypogonadism is a severe condition, but we can also see that the diagnosis becomes a response to a wide range of symptoms, expanding the realm for diagnostic practices and tying into normative ideas about age, time and lacking or fading masculinity. The media narratives about hypogonadism not only reflect cultural norms regarding masculinity and the plasticity of diagnoses but also create desires, needs and markets.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"18 1","pages":"5 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48743924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Sexual fluidity among non-heterosexual men: discourses and practices on sexual variability negotiated with hegemonic masculinity 非异性恋男性的性流动性:与霸权男性气质协商的性变异性的话语和实践
IF 2.1 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-07-23 DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2022.2104100
Rita Grave, Ana R. Pinho, A. Marques, Conceição Nogueira
ABSTRACT Hegemonic masculinity constitutes a relevant tool for understanding the genderization processes prevailing in men’s sexualities. Hence, we deployed this concept as a resource to analyse how sexual fluidity might apply to the sexuality of non-heterosexual men and how they experienced this. We carried out semi-structured interviews with 15 participants, ranging from 20 to 53 years old, who all reported having experienced sexual fluidity. This article presents experiences of sexual fluidity as a shifting identity amidst flexible sexual activities and concerns over normativity through personal and social reactions taking place in a heterostable social world. These results exhibit the negotiations of sexual fluidity with hegemonic masculinities, both reproduced and questioned.
霸权男性气质构成了理解男性性取向中普遍存在的性别化过程的相关工具。因此,我们将这一概念作为一种资源来分析性流动性如何适用于非异性恋男性的性行为,以及他们是如何经历的。我们对15名参与者进行了半结构化访谈,年龄从20岁到53岁不等,他们都表示经历过性流动。这篇文章通过异性恋社会世界中发生的个人和社会反应,呈现了性流动的体验,即在灵活的性活动中身份的转变,以及对规范性的担忧。这些结果展示了性流动性与霸权男性气质的谈判,既有再现,也有质疑。
{"title":"Sexual fluidity among non-heterosexual men: discourses and practices on sexual variability negotiated with hegemonic masculinity","authors":"Rita Grave, Ana R. Pinho, A. Marques, Conceição Nogueira","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2022.2104100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2022.2104100","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Hegemonic masculinity constitutes a relevant tool for understanding the genderization processes prevailing in men’s sexualities. Hence, we deployed this concept as a resource to analyse how sexual fluidity might apply to the sexuality of non-heterosexual men and how they experienced this. We carried out semi-structured interviews with 15 participants, ranging from 20 to 53 years old, who all reported having experienced sexual fluidity. This article presents experiences of sexual fluidity as a shifting identity amidst flexible sexual activities and concerns over normativity through personal and social reactions taking place in a heterostable social world. These results exhibit the negotiations of sexual fluidity with hegemonic masculinities, both reproduced and questioned.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"17 1","pages":"219 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42508257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Returning to the ‘Man’ question in the posthuman predicament? 回到后人类困境中的“人”问题?
IF 2.1 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2022.2103298
Ulf Mellström
This journal is founded upon the premise of an emancipatory call for investigating, presenting, finding and opening up for new and alternative masculine gendered subjectivities. We do that by collecting and presenting work that almost always offers us keys to possibilities for reconsidering, rethinking and possibly exiting historically inherited and contemporary forms of masculinity. As such we are of course part of a long history of feminist and profeminist work that articulates and frames our fears and hopes regarding ethically acceptable and potentially less destructive forms of masculinities. This is also true for the four articles in this current issue of Norma: ‘Intersectionality and social justice in programs for boys and men’ Keddie, Amanda; Flood, Michael & Hewson-Munro, Shelley; ‘The reflective process of the perpetrator: representations of rape in novels of C.N. Adidche and V.T. Nguyn’ Cohen, Omri; ‘Rituals of (un)changing masculinity: cohesion or diversity? A study of the fraternization traditions of Swedish cadets’ at the Military Academy’ Malmio, Irja; and ‘Filial obligations, affect and masculinities: Vietnamese-Australian young men being and becoming good sons’ by Garth Stahl and Yang Zhao. However, before giving a brief introduction to these articles in the end of this editorial, I will articulate some concerns in contemporary masculinity studies as well as reconnecting to some others that are part of our Norma’s scope of questions. As we are moving into new theoretical landscapes in masculinity studies where the connection to feminist theorizing is a constant junction to be revisited, we return to some of the ground pillars of masculinity studies such as the ‘Man question’. Such concerns are addressed in an upcoming volume (fc. Mellström & Pease, 2022) where several key thinkers in the field are taking on the question of how to calibrate masculinity studies in relation to the contemporary posthuman predicament of our world. My reasoning here draws upon some of the ideas raised in this forthcoming volume. In times of uncertainty caused by wars, climate crisis and political backlashes facing any progressive change concerning gender and sexuality, we are even more confronted with basic ontological questions connected to power and existence. Feminist theorizing has for a long time addressed such questions, not least in the theoretical wave of posthuman feminism, new materialism and theories of affect in the last decades. This wave of scholarship has come to reformulate and reinvigorate a large umbrella of onto-epistemological questions concerning subjectivity, sex, gender, sexual difference, bodily appearance, systems of affect, relationality, matter, agency, human and non-human, ecology and technology. The umbrella is far too extensive to meaningfully summarize here, but there are certain questions that reoccur with a new emphasis. The ‘Man question’ is no doubt one of those and where is that question better addressed than in mascu
这本杂志是在解放呼吁的前提下创办的,要求调查、呈现、发现和开放新的和可替代的男性性别主观主义。我们通过收集和展示作品来做到这一点,这些作品几乎总是为我们提供重新思考、重新思考并可能退出历史遗留和当代形式的男性气概的可能性的钥匙。因此,我们当然是长期以来女权主义和专业主义工作的一部分,这些工作表达并表达了我们对道德上可接受且潜在破坏性较小的男性气概的恐惧和希望。本期《诺玛》杂志上的四篇文章也是如此:“男孩和男人项目中的交叉性和社会正义”Keddie,Amanda;Flood,Michael&Hewson Munro,Shelley犯罪者的反思过程:C.N.Adidche和V.T.Nguyn的小说中对强奸的描述“Cohen,Omri;”男性气质变化的仪式:凝聚力还是多样性?“在军事学院”对瑞典学员联谊传统的研究,马尔米奥,Irja;以及Garth Stahl和Yang赵的《孝道义务、情感和男子气概:越南-澳大利亚年轻人成为好儿子》。然而,在这篇社论的结尾简要介绍这些文章之前,我将阐明当代男性气质研究中的一些问题,并重新联系到我们诺玛问题范围内的其他一些问题。当我们进入男性气质研究的新理论领域时,与女权主义理论的联系是一个需要重新审视的不断连接点,我们回到了男性气质研究中的一些基本支柱,如“男人问题”。这些担忧在即将出版的一本书中得到了解决(fc.Mellström&Pease,2022),该领域的几位关键思想家正在探讨如何将男性气质研究与当代人类后的困境联系起来。我在这里的推理借鉴了即将出版的这本书中提出的一些想法。在战争、气候危机和政治反弹造成的不确定性时代,面对任何关于性别和性的进步变化,我们甚至面临着与权力和存在相关的基本本体论问题。长期以来,女权主义理论一直在解决这些问题,尤其是在过去几十年的后人类女权主义、新唯物主义和情感理论的理论浪潮中。这一波学术浪潮已经重新形成并振兴了一个关于主体性、性别、性别差异、外表、情感系统、关系性、物质、能动性、人类和非人类、生态学和技术的认识论问题的大伞。保护伞太过广泛,无法在这里进行有意义的总结,但有些问题会以新的重点再次出现。毫无疑问,“男人问题”就是其中之一,这个问题在哪里比男性气质研究更能得到解决?然而,除了少数例外,男性气质研究才开始考虑后人道主义、情感理论和新唯物主义的概念词汇和思想(参见Garlick,20162019;Matthews,2018;Mellström,20162020;Pease,2021a,2021b;Reeser&Gottzen,2018)。这一波学术浪潮是一个多层面的行动,指向情感,
{"title":"Returning to the ‘Man’ question in the posthuman predicament?","authors":"Ulf Mellström","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2022.2103298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2022.2103298","url":null,"abstract":"This journal is founded upon the premise of an emancipatory call for investigating, presenting, finding and opening up for new and alternative masculine gendered subjectivities. We do that by collecting and presenting work that almost always offers us keys to possibilities for reconsidering, rethinking and possibly exiting historically inherited and contemporary forms of masculinity. As such we are of course part of a long history of feminist and profeminist work that articulates and frames our fears and hopes regarding ethically acceptable and potentially less destructive forms of masculinities. This is also true for the four articles in this current issue of Norma: ‘Intersectionality and social justice in programs for boys and men’ Keddie, Amanda; Flood, Michael & Hewson-Munro, Shelley; ‘The reflective process of the perpetrator: representations of rape in novels of C.N. Adidche and V.T. Nguyn’ Cohen, Omri; ‘Rituals of (un)changing masculinity: cohesion or diversity? A study of the fraternization traditions of Swedish cadets’ at the Military Academy’ Malmio, Irja; and ‘Filial obligations, affect and masculinities: Vietnamese-Australian young men being and becoming good sons’ by Garth Stahl and Yang Zhao. However, before giving a brief introduction to these articles in the end of this editorial, I will articulate some concerns in contemporary masculinity studies as well as reconnecting to some others that are part of our Norma’s scope of questions. As we are moving into new theoretical landscapes in masculinity studies where the connection to feminist theorizing is a constant junction to be revisited, we return to some of the ground pillars of masculinity studies such as the ‘Man question’. Such concerns are addressed in an upcoming volume (fc. Mellström & Pease, 2022) where several key thinkers in the field are taking on the question of how to calibrate masculinity studies in relation to the contemporary posthuman predicament of our world. My reasoning here draws upon some of the ideas raised in this forthcoming volume. In times of uncertainty caused by wars, climate crisis and political backlashes facing any progressive change concerning gender and sexuality, we are even more confronted with basic ontological questions connected to power and existence. Feminist theorizing has for a long time addressed such questions, not least in the theoretical wave of posthuman feminism, new materialism and theories of affect in the last decades. This wave of scholarship has come to reformulate and reinvigorate a large umbrella of onto-epistemological questions concerning subjectivity, sex, gender, sexual difference, bodily appearance, systems of affect, relationality, matter, agency, human and non-human, ecology and technology. The umbrella is far too extensive to meaningfully summarize here, but there are certain questions that reoccur with a new emphasis. The ‘Man question’ is no doubt one of those and where is that question better addressed than in mascu","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"17 1","pages":"143 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49150892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The masculinization of domestic cooking: a historical study of Swedish cookbooks for men 家庭烹饪的男性化:瑞典男性食谱的历史研究
IF 2.1 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-06-22 DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2022.2091918
H. Andersson, Göran Eriksson
ABSTRACT This study analyzes how men’s domestic cooking is represented and masculinized in cookbooks, written by men for men and published in 1975, 1992, and 2010, respectively. Departing from the concept of domestic masculinities, it uses the methods of Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis. It asks: what kind of values and ideas connected to men, food, and the home are realized in texts and images? And how are these legitimized and naturalized? As the study’s context is Sweden, a country known for its pursuit of gender equality, the study focuses on how men’s domestic cooking has been represented in cookbooks published roughly 20 years apart. The analysis shows that, while the first two books are characterized by a ‘real man’ discourse and working-class masculinity, the 2010 book represents a masculinity in line with a ‘new man image’ closely linked to consumption and materiality. However, structurally, there are few differences. Values associated with traditional middle-class masculinities, traditional gender norms, and gendered division of domestic labor are reproduced. Men’s cooking is recontextualized as a playful leisure activity. In all three books, cooking becomes another way for a man to appear successful – both in relation to other men and women, and in socioeconomic terms.
摘要本研究分析了男性在1975年、1992年和2010年分别为男性撰写的烹饪书中如何表现和男性化男性的家庭烹饪。它脱离了国内男性气质的概念,采用了多模式批评话语分析的方法。它问道:什么样的价值观和思想与人、食物和家庭有关,是通过文本和图像实现的?这些是如何合法化和归化的?由于这项研究的背景是瑞典,一个以追求性别平等而闻名的国家,这项研究关注的是大约20年前出版的烹饪书中如何体现男性的家庭烹饪。分析表明,虽然前两本书的特点是“真正的男人”话语和工人阶级的男子气概,但2010年的书代表了一种符合与消费和物质性密切相关的“新男人形象”的男子气概。然而,在结构上几乎没有什么不同。与传统中产阶级男性气质、传统性别规范和家庭劳动性别划分相关的价值观被复制。男性烹饪被重新定义为一种有趣的休闲活动。在这三本书中,烹饪成为了一个男人表现成功的另一种方式——无论是在与其他男人和女人的关系上,还是在社会经济方面。
{"title":"The masculinization of domestic cooking: a historical study of Swedish cookbooks for men","authors":"H. Andersson, Göran Eriksson","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2022.2091918","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2022.2091918","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study analyzes how men’s domestic cooking is represented and masculinized in cookbooks, written by men for men and published in 1975, 1992, and 2010, respectively. Departing from the concept of domestic masculinities, it uses the methods of Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis. It asks: what kind of values and ideas connected to men, food, and the home are realized in texts and images? And how are these legitimized and naturalized? As the study’s context is Sweden, a country known for its pursuit of gender equality, the study focuses on how men’s domestic cooking has been represented in cookbooks published roughly 20 years apart. The analysis shows that, while the first two books are characterized by a ‘real man’ discourse and working-class masculinity, the 2010 book represents a masculinity in line with a ‘new man image’ closely linked to consumption and materiality. However, structurally, there are few differences. Values associated with traditional middle-class masculinities, traditional gender norms, and gendered division of domestic labor are reproduced. Men’s cooking is recontextualized as a playful leisure activity. In all three books, cooking becomes another way for a man to appear successful – both in relation to other men and women, and in socioeconomic terms.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"17 1","pages":"252 - 269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46153150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Ambiguous gaze: masculinity and the male body in Dirk Bikkembergs’ fashion and photographic production 暧昧的凝视:德克·比克伯格(Dirk Bikkembergs)时尚与摄影作品中的男性气质与男性身体
IF 2.1 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-06-21 DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2022.2091919
Nicola Brajato, A. Dhoest
ABSTRACT The study of masculinity has recently become relevant to the field of fashion studies. However, fashion is still underrepresented in the field of men’s studies, which hardly takes into account its importance in the cultural construction of masculinities. This article aims to build a bridge between these two fields through the analysis of fashion designer Dirk Bikkembergs. Known as part of the internationally established ‘Antwerp Six’ and for his strong representation of masculinity and the muscular body, Bikkembergs’ imagery is interesting to any scholar wishing to reflect on the cultural definitions of the male body, especially when that body is being presented on the border between normativity and homoeroticism. The article explores the evolution of the visual representation of the male body in photography, and particularly fashion photography, demonstrating how the relationship between masculinity, the male body and the gaze changed over time. We then use the proposed framework for a critical investigation of the visual imagery of Bikkembergs’ world, which revolves very much around masculinity and the male body, to pinpoint an ambiguity at the base of the brand: despite the brand’s normative narrative and orientation, we posit that its photographic production leaves space for a queer reading.
最近,男性气质的研究与时尚研究领域相关。然而,时尚在男性研究领域的代表性仍然不足,这几乎没有考虑到它在男子气概文化建设中的重要性。本文旨在通过对服装设计师Dirk Bikkembergs的分析,在这两个领域之间架起一座桥梁。作为国际知名的“安特卫普六人组”的一员,Bikkembergs强烈地表现了男性气概和肌肉发达的身体,对于任何希望反思男性身体文化定义的学者来说,Bikkembergs的形象都很有趣,尤其是当身体被呈现在规范性和同性恋之间的边界时。这篇文章探讨了男性身体在摄影中的视觉表现的演变,尤其是时尚摄影,展示了男性气质、男性身体和凝视之间的关系是如何随着时间的推移而变化的。然后,我们使用提出的框架对Bikkembergs世界的视觉图像进行批判性调查,该世界主要围绕男性气质和男性身体展开,以确定品牌基础上的模糊性:尽管该品牌有规范的叙事和方向,但我们认为其摄影作品为奇怪的阅读留下了空间。
{"title":"Ambiguous gaze: masculinity and the male body in Dirk Bikkembergs’ fashion and photographic production","authors":"Nicola Brajato, A. Dhoest","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2022.2091919","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2022.2091919","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study of masculinity has recently become relevant to the field of fashion studies. However, fashion is still underrepresented in the field of men’s studies, which hardly takes into account its importance in the cultural construction of masculinities. This article aims to build a bridge between these two fields through the analysis of fashion designer Dirk Bikkembergs. Known as part of the internationally established ‘Antwerp Six’ and for his strong representation of masculinity and the muscular body, Bikkembergs’ imagery is interesting to any scholar wishing to reflect on the cultural definitions of the male body, especially when that body is being presented on the border between normativity and homoeroticism. The article explores the evolution of the visual representation of the male body in photography, and particularly fashion photography, demonstrating how the relationship between masculinity, the male body and the gaze changed over time. We then use the proposed framework for a critical investigation of the visual imagery of Bikkembergs’ world, which revolves very much around masculinity and the male body, to pinpoint an ambiguity at the base of the brand: despite the brand’s normative narrative and orientation, we posit that its photographic production leaves space for a queer reading.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"18 1","pages":"21 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43966751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
The fantasy of the new man: norm-critique, vulnerability and victimhood 新男人的幻想:规范批判,脆弱和受害者
IF 2.1 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-05-28 DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2022.2075666
Josef Olsson, Johanna Lauri
ABSTRACT In this article, the Swedish gender-equality initiative Men and Gender Equality is analyzed. The goal is to empirically examine some of the affective dimensions at play in the ways in which a ‘norm-critical’ perspective on masculinity is articulated as a solution to gender equality. Our analysis reveals ambivalences operating within the initiative’s use of norm-critical perspectives. Despite the apparent intention to offer men the hope of emancipating themselves from sedimented practices and modes of being men, these end up potentially reinforcing certain assumptions and aspects of extant society. They include (neo-)liberal assumptions about individual responsibility as well as post-feminist and anti-feminist discursive logics and tropes. With a theoretical focus on fantasy, we show how a reformist attempt to reimagine what male identities could be ends up perpetuating certain myths and assumptions that work against the emancipatory vision nurtured within such discourses.
本文分析了瑞典性别平等倡议“男性与性别平等”。我们的目标是通过经验来检验一些在发挥作用的情感维度,在这些维度中,“规范批判”的男性气质视角被阐述为性别平等的解决方案。我们的分析揭示了在使用规范-批判视角的主动性中操作的矛盾心理。尽管这些明显的意图是为男性提供将自己从沉淀的实践和作为男性的模式中解放出来的希望,但这些最终可能会强化现有社会的某些假设和方面。它们包括(新)自由主义关于个人责任的假设,以及后女权主义和反女权主义的话语逻辑和修辞。通过对幻想的理论关注,我们展示了改良主义者如何试图重新想象男性身份,最终使某些神话和假设永久化,这些神话和假设与这些话语中培养的解放愿景背道而驰。
{"title":"The fantasy of the new man: norm-critique, vulnerability and victimhood","authors":"Josef Olsson, Johanna Lauri","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2022.2075666","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2022.2075666","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, the Swedish gender-equality initiative Men and Gender Equality is analyzed. The goal is to empirically examine some of the affective dimensions at play in the ways in which a ‘norm-critical’ perspective on masculinity is articulated as a solution to gender equality. Our analysis reveals ambivalences operating within the initiative’s use of norm-critical perspectives. Despite the apparent intention to offer men the hope of emancipating themselves from sedimented practices and modes of being men, these end up potentially reinforcing certain assumptions and aspects of extant society. They include (neo-)liberal assumptions about individual responsibility as well as post-feminist and anti-feminist discursive logics and tropes. With a theoretical focus on fantasy, we show how a reformist attempt to reimagine what male identities could be ends up perpetuating certain myths and assumptions that work against the emancipatory vision nurtured within such discourses.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"17 1","pages":"236 - 251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42587839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
South African queer sons challenging the white father’s legacy: forging new Afrikaner male identities in Etienne Kallos’s Die Stropers (The Harvesters) 南非酷儿儿子挑战白人父亲的遗产:在艾蒂安·卡洛斯的《收割者》中塑造新的阿非利卡男性身份
IF 2.1 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-05-17 DOI: 10.1080/18902138.2022.2076528
Grant Andrews
ABSTRACT The figure of the patriarchal white Afrikaner male was central to conceptualising and maintaining the system of apartheid in South Africa, and lingers in the imaginary of white identities in the country. Idealised white masculinity, embodied by the patriarch, is marked by strict gender roles and the rejection of same-sex sexualities, as these sexualities are seen as threatening to institutions like the heteronormative family and conservative Christianity. The 2018 South African film Die Stropers (The Harvesters) by Etienne Kallos represents queer sons in the rural farm setting. The film offers possibilities for disentangling white masculinities from heterosexist ideologies. Mirrors, mirroring and recognition/misrecognition are analysed as devices that represent the reproduction of ideology in the film, but queer sons are able to challenge these forms of mirroring and ultimately disrupt hegemonic masculinities that would stifle their identities, desires and forms of gender expression.
摘要父权制白人白人白人男性形象是南非种族隔离制度概念化和维持的核心,并徘徊在该国白人身份的想象中。父权制所体现的理想化白人男子气概以严格的性别角色和拒绝同性性行为为标志,因为这些性行为被视为对异规范家庭和保守基督教等机构的威胁。艾蒂安·卡洛斯(Etienne Kallos)2018年的南非电影《收割者》(Die Stropers)代表了农村农场环境中的酷儿。这部电影提供了将白人男性气质与异性恋意识形态区分开来的可能性。镜像、镜像和识别/误认被分析为代表电影中意识形态再现的手段,但酷儿能够挑战这些镜像形式,并最终破坏霸权男性气质,这将扼杀他们的身份、欲望和性别表达形式。
{"title":"South African queer sons challenging the white father’s legacy: forging new Afrikaner male identities in Etienne Kallos’s Die Stropers (The Harvesters)","authors":"Grant Andrews","doi":"10.1080/18902138.2022.2076528","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2022.2076528","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The figure of the patriarchal white Afrikaner male was central to conceptualising and maintaining the system of apartheid in South Africa, and lingers in the imaginary of white identities in the country. Idealised white masculinity, embodied by the patriarch, is marked by strict gender roles and the rejection of same-sex sexualities, as these sexualities are seen as threatening to institutions like the heteronormative family and conservative Christianity. The 2018 South African film Die Stropers (The Harvesters) by Etienne Kallos represents queer sons in the rural farm setting. The film offers possibilities for disentangling white masculinities from heterosexist ideologies. Mirrors, mirroring and recognition/misrecognition are analysed as devices that represent the reproduction of ideology in the film, but queer sons are able to challenge these forms of mirroring and ultimately disrupt hegemonic masculinities that would stifle their identities, desires and forms of gender expression.","PeriodicalId":37885,"journal":{"name":"NORMA","volume":"18 1","pages":"122 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42768339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
NORMA
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1