Pub Date : 2024-11-08eCollection Date: 2024-06-01DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2024-0014
Jason Shafrin, Jaehong Kim, Joshua T Cohen, Louis P Garrison, Dana A Goldman, Jalpa A Doshi, Joshua Krieger, Darius N Lakdawalla, Peter J Neumann, Charles E Phelps, Melanie D Whittington, Richard Willke
This study argues that value assessment conducted from a societal perspective should rely on the Generalized Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (GCEA) framework proposed herein. Recently developed value assessment inventories - such as the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness's "impact inventory" and International Society of Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Research (ISPOR) "value flower" - aimed to more comprehensively capture the benefits and costs of new health technologies from a societal perspective. Nevertheless, application of broader value elements in practice has been limited in part because quantifying these elements can be complex, but also because there have been numerous methodological advances since these value inventories have been released (e.g. generalized and risk-adjusted cost effectiveness). To facilitate estimation of treatment value from a societal perspective, this paper provides an updated value inventory - called the GCEA value flower - and a user guide for implementing GCEA for health economics researchers and practitioners. GCEA considers 15 broader value elements across four categories: (i) uncertainty, (ii) dynamics, (iii) beneficiary, and (iv) additional value components. The uncertainty category incorporates patient risk preferences into value assessment. The dynamics category petals account for the evolution of real-world treatment value (e.g. option value) and includes drug pricing trends (e.g. future genericization). The beneficiary category accounts for the fact health technologies can benefit others (e.g. caregivers) and also that society may care to whom health benefits accrue (e.g. equity). Finally, GCEA incorporates additional broader sources of value (e.g. community spillovers, productivity losses). This GCEA user guide aims to facilitate both the estimation of each of these value elements and the incorporation of these values into health technology assessment when conducted from a societal perspective.
{"title":"Valuing the Societal Impact of Medicines and Other Health Technologies: A User Guide to Current Best Practices.","authors":"Jason Shafrin, Jaehong Kim, Joshua T Cohen, Louis P Garrison, Dana A Goldman, Jalpa A Doshi, Joshua Krieger, Darius N Lakdawalla, Peter J Neumann, Charles E Phelps, Melanie D Whittington, Richard Willke","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2024-0014","DOIUrl":"10.1515/fhep-2024-0014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study argues that value assessment conducted from a societal perspective should rely on the Generalized Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (GCEA) framework proposed herein. Recently developed value assessment inventories - such as the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness's \"impact inventory\" and International Society of Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Research (ISPOR) \"value flower\" - aimed to more comprehensively capture the benefits and costs of new health technologies from a societal perspective. Nevertheless, application of broader value elements in practice has been limited in part because quantifying these elements can be complex, but also because there have been numerous methodological advances since these value inventories have been released (e.g. generalized and risk-adjusted cost effectiveness). To facilitate estimation of treatment value from a societal perspective, this paper provides an updated value inventory - called the GCEA value flower - and a <i>user guide</i> for implementing GCEA for health economics researchers and practitioners. GCEA considers 15 broader value elements across four categories: (i) uncertainty, (ii) dynamics, (iii) beneficiary, and (iv) additional value components. The uncertainty category incorporates patient risk preferences into value assessment. The dynamics category petals account for the evolution of real-world treatment value (e.g. option value) and includes drug pricing trends (e.g. future genericization). The beneficiary category accounts for the fact health technologies can benefit others (e.g. caregivers) and also that society may care to whom health benefits accrue (e.g. equity). Finally, GCEA incorporates additional broader sources of value (e.g. community spillovers, productivity losses). This GCEA user guide aims to facilitate both the estimation of each of these value elements and the incorporation of these values into health technology assessment when conducted from a societal perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":"27 1","pages":"29-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567015/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142606219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-05eCollection Date: 2024-06-01DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2024-0002
Salvatore Barbaro, Nathalie Neu-Yanders, Nina König
Despite the implementation of significant measures by European countries in recent years, smoking rates in Europe remain persistently high. The European Commission is currently undertaking a comprehensive review of its tobacco regulations. This article aims to address critical inquiries that arise during the amendment of the regulatory framework. We evaluate the effectiveness of existing tobacco control methods and observe a diminishing impact on promoting smoking cessation. Additionally, we explore how individuals of varying genders respond to the regulatory environment. We propose a comprehensive and evidence-based framework for implementing a taxation system in response to the proliferation of emerging products, including e-cigarettes and heated tobacco. This system is designed to align effectively with health policy objectives, providing a strategic approach to curbing tobacco use and promoting public health.
{"title":"A Health Economics Inquiry into Regulatory Constraints on the European Tobacco Market.","authors":"Salvatore Barbaro, Nathalie Neu-Yanders, Nina König","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2024-0002","DOIUrl":"10.1515/fhep-2024-0002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the implementation of significant measures by European countries in recent years, smoking rates in Europe remain persistently high. The European Commission is currently undertaking a comprehensive review of its tobacco regulations. This article aims to address critical inquiries that arise during the amendment of the regulatory framework. We evaluate the effectiveness of existing tobacco control methods and observe a diminishing impact on promoting smoking cessation. Additionally, we explore how individuals of varying genders respond to the regulatory environment. We propose a comprehensive and evidence-based framework for implementing a taxation system in response to the proliferation of emerging products, including e-cigarettes and heated tobacco. This system is designed to align effectively with health policy objectives, providing a strategic approach to curbing tobacco use and promoting public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142582741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-15eCollection Date: 2023-12-01DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2022-0025
James E Prieger
As the tax base for traditional tobacco excise taxes continues to erode, policymakers have growing interest to expand taxation to novel and reduced-risk tobacco products. Chief among the latter are electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS; commonly known as e-cigarettes), although other reduced-risk tobacco products such as heated tobacco and smokeless tobacco products are also being considered for taxation. There are many possible rationales for taxing such products: to raise revenue, to correct for health externalities, to improve public health, to correct for internalities caused by irrationality or misinformation, and to redistribute income. Although each rationale leads to a different objective function, the conclusions regarding relative tax rates are largely the same. The relatively higher price elasticity of demand for e-cigarettes (compared to cigarettes) and the lower marginal harms from use imply in each case that taxes on e-cigarettes and other harm-reduced products should be relatively lower, and likely much lower, than those on cigarettes. Additional considerations concerning the policy goal of discouraging use of any tobacco product by youth are discussed as well.
{"title":"Optimal Taxation of Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes: Principles for Taxing Reduced-Harm Tobacco Products.","authors":"James E Prieger","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2022-0025","DOIUrl":"10.1515/fhep-2022-0025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the tax base for traditional tobacco excise taxes continues to erode, policymakers have growing interest to expand taxation to novel and reduced-risk tobacco products. Chief among the latter are electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS; commonly known as e-cigarettes), although other reduced-risk tobacco products such as heated tobacco and smokeless tobacco products are also being considered for taxation. There are many possible rationales for taxing such products: to raise revenue, to correct for health externalities, to improve public health, to correct for internalities caused by irrationality or misinformation, and to redistribute income. Although each rationale leads to a different objective function, the conclusions regarding relative tax rates are largely the same. The relatively higher price elasticity of demand for e-cigarettes (compared to cigarettes) and the lower marginal harms from use imply in each case that taxes on e-cigarettes and other harm-reduced products should be relatively lower, and likely much lower, than those on cigarettes. Additional considerations concerning the policy goal of discouraging use of any tobacco product by youth are discussed as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":" ","pages":"41-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138811563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-10-04eCollection Date: 2023-12-01DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2021-0070
Eduardo Ignacio Polo-Muro
This research examines the mental health inequalities between employed and unemployed individuals among the fluctuations over the business cycle. To analyze whether a recession affects self-evaluated mental health and consequently increases the demand for mental health care, I exploit the sudden increase of the unemployment rate in Spain during the period 2007-2009. First, I analyze the impairment of self-evaluated mental health as a consequence of the Great Recession and if it prevails during the economic recovery. In addition, I estimate if the effect on self-reported mental health is reflected in demand for mental health care. The results from an event study design show that the economic downturn increases the differences between employed and unemployed individuals in self-evaluated mental health. However, and despite the continuous improvement in unemployment, the mental health gap remained unchanged between 2014 and 2017, which could imply the persistence of some lasting impacts of the Great Recession on mental health. Nonetheless, I find a reduction in the differences of using drugs related to mental health during the period 2011-2012, when I estimate the largest inequalities in self-evaluated mental health.
{"title":"Self-Reported Mental Health and the Demand for Mental Health Care After a Labor Market Shock: Evidence from the Spanish Great Recession.","authors":"Eduardo Ignacio Polo-Muro","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2021-0070","DOIUrl":"10.1515/fhep-2021-0070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research examines the mental health inequalities between employed and unemployed individuals among the fluctuations over the business cycle. To analyze whether a recession affects self-evaluated mental health and consequently increases the demand for mental health care, I exploit the sudden increase of the unemployment rate in Spain during the period 2007-2009. First, I analyze the impairment of self-evaluated mental health as a consequence of the Great Recession and if it prevails during the economic recovery. In addition, I estimate if the effect on self-reported mental health is reflected in demand for mental health care. The results from an event study design show that the economic downturn increases the differences between employed and unemployed individuals in self-evaluated mental health. However, and despite the continuous improvement in unemployment, the mental health gap remained unchanged between 2014 and 2017, which could imply the persistence of some lasting impacts of the Great Recession on mental health. Nonetheless, I find a reduction in the differences of using drugs related to mental health during the period 2011-2012, when I estimate the largest inequalities in self-evaluated mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":" ","pages":"17-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41154000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rotem Naftalovich, Uri Hochfeld, Robert Gubkin, George Louli Tewfik
{"title":"Benefits of Adopting by Reference Portions of Clinical Protocols.","authors":"Rotem Naftalovich, Uri Hochfeld, Robert Gubkin, George Louli Tewfik","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2020-0041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2020-0041","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":"26 1","pages":"13-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10225684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In recent years, Medicare margins of U.S. short-term acute care hospitals participating in the inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) have declined nationally by over 10 percentage points, from 2.2% in 2002 to -8.7% in 2019. This trend conceals critical regional variations, with recent studies documenting particularly low and negative margins in metropolitan areas with higher labor costs despite geographic adjustments by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). In this article, we describe recent trends in California hospitals' traditional fee-for-service Medicare operating margins compared to hospital operating margins across payers and changes in the CMS hospital wage index (HWI) used to adjust Medicare payments. We conduct an observational study of audited financial reports of IPPS-participating California hospitals using California Department of Health Care Access and Information and CMS data for years 2005-2020 (n = 4429 reports included in the analysis). We describe trends in financial measures by payer and investigate associations between HWI and traditional Medicare margins, focusing on the pre-COVID period of 2005 through 2019. During that period, California hospitals' statewide traditional Medicare operating margin declined from -27 to -40%, and financial shortfalls in caring for fee-for-service Medicare patients more than doubled ($4.1 billion in 2005 to $8.5 billion in 2019, both values in 2019 dollars). Meanwhile, operating margins from commercial managed care patients increased from 21% in 2005 to 38% in 2019. There was a stable negative association between HWI and traditional Medicare operating margins throughout the period (p = 0.000 in 2005; p < 0.0001 in 2006-2020), indicating that areas of California with higher health care wages had persistently worse traditional Medicare operating margins than areas with lower wages.
{"title":"California Hospitals' Rapidly Declining Traditional Medicare Operating Margins.","authors":"Étienne Gaudette, Jay Bhattacharya","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2022-0038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2022-0038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, Medicare margins of U.S. short-term acute care hospitals participating in the inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) have declined nationally by over 10 percentage points, from 2.2% in 2002 to -8.7% in 2019. This trend conceals critical regional variations, with recent studies documenting particularly low and negative margins in metropolitan areas with higher labor costs despite geographic adjustments by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). In this article, we describe recent trends in California hospitals' traditional fee-for-service Medicare operating margins compared to hospital operating margins across payers and changes in the CMS hospital wage index (HWI) used to adjust Medicare payments. We conduct an observational study of audited financial reports of IPPS-participating California hospitals using California Department of Health Care Access and Information and CMS data for years 2005-2020 (n = 4429 reports included in the analysis). We describe trends in financial measures by payer and investigate associations between HWI and traditional Medicare margins, focusing on the pre-COVID period of 2005 through 2019. During that period, California hospitals' statewide traditional Medicare operating margin declined from -27 to -40%, and financial shortfalls in caring for fee-for-service Medicare patients more than doubled ($4.1 billion in 2005 to $8.5 billion in 2019, both values in 2019 dollars). Meanwhile, operating margins from commercial managed care patients increased from 21% in 2005 to 38% in 2019. There was a stable negative association between HWI and traditional Medicare operating margins throughout the period (<i>p</i> = 0.000 in 2005; <i>p</i> < 0.0001 in 2006-2020), indicating that areas of California with higher health care wages had persistently worse traditional Medicare operating margins than areas with lower wages.</p>","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":"26 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10223995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-06-01DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2023-frontmatter1
{"title":"Frontmatter","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2023-frontmatter1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2023-frontmatter1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135096220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the utility of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) for studying the impact of working conditions on individuals' health, well-being and labor supply decisions at older ages. I provide a brief overview of the information on working conditions that is currently available in the HRS and discuss implications for studies on the effects of working conditions on the individual life course. I conclude with a discussion of how recent and projected trends in the U.S. workforce are reflected in the current HRS survey content.
{"title":"Using the Health and Retirement Study for Research on the Impact of the Working Conditions on the Individual Life Course.","authors":"Kathleen J Mullen","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2021-0059","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2021-0059","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this paper is to evaluate the utility of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) for studying the impact of working conditions on individuals' health, well-being and labor supply decisions at older ages. I provide a brief overview of the information on working conditions that is currently available in the HRS and discuss implications for studies on the effects of working conditions on the individual life course. I conclude with a discussion of how recent and projected trends in the U.S. workforce are reflected in the current HRS survey content.</p>","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":"25 1-2","pages":"85-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10661586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In the absence of effective pharmacological treatment to halt or reverse the course of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs), population-level research on the modifiable determinants of dementia risk and outcomes for those living with ADRD is critical. The Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP), fielded in 2016 as part of the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and multiple international counterparts, has the potential to play an important role in such efforts. The stated goals of the HCAP are to improve our ability to understand the determinants, prevalence, costs, and consequences of cognitive impairment and dementia in the U.S. and to support cross-national comparisons. The first wave of the HCAP demonstrated the feasibility and value of the more detailed cognitive assessments in the HCAP compared to the brief cognitive assessments in the core HRS interviews. To achieve its full potential, we provide eight recommendations for improving future iterations of the HCAP. Our highest priority recommendation is to increase the representation of historically marginalized racial/ethnic groups disproportionately affected by ADRDs. Additional recommendations relate to the timing of the HCAP assessments; clinical and biomarker validation data, including to improve cross-national comparisons; dropping lower performing items; enhanced documentation; and the addition of measures related to caregiver impact. We believe that the capacity of the HCAP to achieve its stated goals will be greatly enhanced by considering these changes and additions.
{"title":"Future Directions for the HRS Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol.","authors":"Jacqueline M Torres, M Maria Glymour","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2021-0064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2021-0064","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the absence of effective pharmacological treatment to halt or reverse the course of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRDs), population-level research on the modifiable determinants of dementia risk and outcomes for those living with ADRD is critical. The Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP), fielded in 2016 as part of the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and multiple international counterparts, has the potential to play an important role in such efforts. The stated goals of the HCAP are to improve our ability to understand the determinants, prevalence, costs, and consequences of cognitive impairment and dementia in the U.S. and to support cross-national comparisons. The first wave of the HCAP demonstrated the feasibility and value of the more detailed cognitive assessments in the HCAP compared to the brief cognitive assessments in the core HRS interviews. To achieve its full potential, we provide eight recommendations for improving future iterations of the HCAP. Our highest priority recommendation is to increase the representation of historically marginalized racial/ethnic groups disproportionately affected by ADRDs. Additional recommendations relate to the timing of the HCAP assessments; clinical and biomarker validation data, including to improve cross-national comparisons; dropping lower performing items; enhanced documentation; and the addition of measures related to caregiver impact. We believe that the capacity of the HCAP to achieve its stated goals will be greatly enhanced by considering these changes and additions.</p>","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":"25 1-2","pages":"7-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10661169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The Health and Retirement Study is an amazing resource for those studying aging in the United States, and a fantastic model for other countries who have created similar longitudinal studies. The raw amount of information, from data on income, wealth, and use of health services to employment, retirement, and family connections on to the collection of clinical biomarkers can be both empowering and overwhelming to a researcher. Luckily through the process of engagement with the research community and constant improvement, these reams of data are not only consistently growing in a thoughtful and focused direction, they are also explained and summarized to increase the ease of use for all. One of the very useful areas of the HRS is the Contextual Data File (CDF), which is the focus of this review. The CDF provides access to easy-to-use helpful community-level data in a secure environment that has allowed researchers to answer questions that would have otherwise been difficult or impossible to tackle. The current CDF includes data in six categories (University of Michigan Institute for Social Research. 2017. HRS Data Book: The Health and Retirement Study: Aging in the 21st Century, Challenges and Opportunities for Americans. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Also available at https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/about/data-book, 17): 1. Socio-economic Status and Demographic Structure 2. Psychosocial Stressors 3. Health Care 4. Physical Hazards 5. Amenities 6. Land Use and the Built Environment. Each of these areas have allowed researchers to answer interesting questions such as what is the impact of air pollution on cognition in older adults (Ailshire, J., and K. M. Walsemann. 2021. "Education Differences in the Adverse Impact of PM 2.5 on Incident Cognitive Impairment Among U.S. Older Adults." Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 79 (2): 615-25), the impact of neighborhood characteristics on obesity in older adults (Grafova, I. B., V. A. Freedman, R. Kumar, and J. Rogowski. 2008. "Neighborhoods and Obesity in Later Life." American Journal of Public Health 98: 2065-71), or even what do we gain from introducing contextual data to a survey analysis (Wilkinson, L. R., K. F. Ferraro, and B. R. Kemp. 2017. "Contextualization of Survey Data: What Do We Gain and Does it Matter?" Research in Human Development 14 (3): 234-52)? My review focuses on the potential to expand contextual data in a few of these areas. From new data sets developed and released by the U.S. Census Bureau, to improved measurements of climate and environmental risk, there are numerous new data sources that would be a boon to the research community if they were joined together with the HRS. The following section begins by breaking down the opportunity provided by community or place-based data before moving on to specific recommendations for new data that could be included in the HRS contextual data file.
健康与退休研究对于那些在美国研究老龄化的人来说是一个了不起的资源,对于其他已经建立了类似纵向研究的国家来说也是一个很好的模型。从收入、财富和医疗服务使用数据到就业、退休和家庭关系,再到临床生物标志物的收集,这些原始信息的数量对研究人员来说既授权又压倒性。幸运的是,通过与研究界的接触和不断的改进,这些数据不仅在一个深思熟虑和集中的方向上持续增长,而且还被解释和总结,以增加所有人的易用性。HRS的一个非常有用的领域是上下文数据文件(CDF),这是本文的重点。CDF在安全的环境中提供易于使用的有用的社区级数据,使研究人员能够回答否则很难或不可能解决的问题。当前的CDF包括六类数据(密歇根大学社会研究所,2017)。HRS数据手册:健康和退休研究:21世纪的老龄化,美国人的挑战和机遇。安娜堡:密歇根大学。也可在https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/about/data-book, 17): 1;社会经济地位和人口结构心理社会压力源4.医疗保健5.物理危害设施6。土地利用与已建成环境。这些领域中的每一个都让研究人员能够回答一些有趣的问题,比如空气污染对老年人认知的影响(Ailshire, J., and K. M. Walsemann. 2021)。“在美国老年人中,pm2.5对偶发性认知障碍的不利影响的教育差异。”陈晓明,陈晓明,陈晓明,等。2008.中国老年痴呆的发病机制及其影响因素[j] .中国老年痴呆杂志,32(2):615- 625。“社区与晚年肥胖”。美国公共卫生杂志98:2065-71),甚至我们从引入上下文数据到调查分析中获得了什么(Wilkinson, L. R., K. F. Ferraro, and B. R. Kemp. 2017)。“调查数据的语境化:我们获得了什么,它重要吗?”人类发展研究14 (3):234-52 ?我的评论集中在其中一些领域扩展上下文数据的潜力。从美国人口普查局开发和发布的新数据集,到对气候和环境风险的改进测量,如果将许多新的数据来源与HRS结合起来,将对研究界大有裨益。下面的部分首先分析基于社区或地点的数据提供的机会,然后再讨论可以包含在HRS上下文数据文件中的新数据的具体建议。
{"title":"The Health and Retirement Study: Contextual Data Augmentation.","authors":"Christopher Dick","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2021-0068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2021-0068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Health and Retirement Study is an amazing resource for those studying aging in the United States, and a fantastic model for other countries who have created similar longitudinal studies. The raw amount of information, from data on income, wealth, and use of health services to employment, retirement, and family connections on to the collection of clinical biomarkers can be both empowering and overwhelming to a researcher. Luckily through the process of engagement with the research community and constant improvement, these reams of data are not only consistently growing in a thoughtful and focused direction, they are also explained and summarized to increase the ease of use for all. One of the very useful areas of the HRS is the Contextual Data File (CDF), which is the focus of this review. The CDF provides access to easy-to-use helpful community-level data in a secure environment that has allowed researchers to answer questions that would have otherwise been difficult or impossible to tackle. The current CDF includes data in six categories (University of Michigan Institute for Social Research. 2017. <i>HRS Data Book: The Health and Retirement Study: Aging in the 21st Century, Challenges and Opportunities for Americans</i>. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Also available at https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/about/data-book, 17): 1. Socio-economic Status and Demographic Structure 2. Psychosocial Stressors 3. Health Care 4. Physical Hazards 5. Amenities 6. Land Use and the Built Environment. Each of these areas have allowed researchers to answer interesting questions such as what is the impact of air pollution on cognition in older adults (Ailshire, J., and K. M. Walsemann. 2021. \"Education Differences in the Adverse Impact of PM 2.5 on Incident Cognitive Impairment Among U.S. Older Adults.\" <i>Journal of Alzheimer's Disease</i> 79 (2): 615-25), the impact of neighborhood characteristics on obesity in older adults (Grafova, I. B., V. A. Freedman, R. Kumar, and J. Rogowski. 2008. \"Neighborhoods and Obesity in Later Life.\" <i>American Journal of Public Health</i> 98: 2065-71), or even what do we gain from introducing contextual data to a survey analysis (Wilkinson, L. R., K. F. Ferraro, and B. R. Kemp. 2017. \"Contextualization of Survey Data: What Do We Gain and Does it Matter?\" <i>Research in Human Development</i> 14 (3): 234-52)? My review focuses on the potential to expand contextual data in a few of these areas. From new data sets developed and released by the U.S. Census Bureau, to improved measurements of climate and environmental risk, there are numerous new data sources that would be a boon to the research community if they were joined together with the HRS. The following section begins by breaking down the opportunity provided by community or place-based data before moving on to specific recommendations for new data that could be included in the HRS contextual data file.</p>","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":"25 1-2","pages":"29-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10661177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}