首页 > 最新文献

Forum for Health Economics and Policy最新文献

英文 中文
The Transformation of Medicare, 2015 to 2030 2015年至2030年的医疗改革
Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2015-0043
H. Aaron, R. Reischauer
Abstract Medicare today is a better program on almost every dimension than it was just after July 30, 1965 when Lyndon Johnson signed public law 89–97. Nonetheless, short-comings, limitations, and inadequacies remain. What should be done to make Medicare a better program? What should Medicare look like in 2030? In this paper we try to answer these questions. Three perspectives are relevant: that of beneficiaries, current and future; that of policymakers and administrators, the program’s stewards; and that of society at large. We posit certain objectives and goals that we believe – and that we think a broad swath of Americans would agree – should be pursued to improve the Medicare program. Those goals include (a) affordability for Medicare beneficiaries, (b) affordability for the working population that is paying and should continue to pay for much of the current cost of the program, (c) reduction in what we regard as needless complexity, and (d) stability and continuity in several different senses. We restrict ourselves to changes that we judge to be affordable and feasible – politically, technically, and administratively – if not today, then over the next decade or two. We believe that changes in Medicare will remain incremental, as they have been for the last 50 years. We shall assume that the ACA takes root and that the exchanges, whether managed by states or by the federal government on behalf of the states, continue to operate. We shall assume that federal and state officials eventually surmount the administrative challenges they still confront. In particular, we assume that the exchanges come to serve a growing share of the American population and that they increasingly exercise the rather considerable regulatory powers over insurance offerings that the ACA grants to them. We divide Medicare reforms into four categories: payment reform, benefit reform, quality reform and management, and the role of private insurance plans (Medicare Advantage [MA]).
今天的医疗保险几乎在各个方面都比1965年7月30日林登·约翰逊签署89-97号公法之后要好。然而,缺点、限制和不足仍然存在。我们应该做些什么来使医疗保险成为一个更好的项目?2030年的医疗保险应该是什么样子?在本文中,我们试图回答这些问题。有三种观点是相关的:当前和未来受益者的观点;政策制定者和管理者,项目的管理者;整个社会也是如此。我们提出了一些目标和目标,我们相信——我们认为广大美国人会同意——我们应该追求这些目标和目标,以改善医疗保险计划。这些目标包括(a)医疗保险受益人的负担能力,(b)正在支付和应该继续支付该计划大部分当前成本的工作人口的负担能力,(c)减少我们认为不必要的复杂性,以及(d)在几个不同意义上的稳定性和连续性。我们把自己限制在我们认为在政治上、技术上和行政上都负担得起和可行的变革上,如果不是今天,那么在未来的十年或二十年里。我们相信,医疗保险的变化将保持渐进,就像过去50年一样。我们假定《平价医疗法案》能够生根发芽,保险交易所,无论是由各州管理还是由代表各州的联邦政府管理,都将继续运作。我们应该假设联邦和州官员最终克服了他们仍然面临的行政挑战。特别是,我们假设交易所为越来越多的美国人口服务,并且他们越来越多地对ACA授予他们的保险产品行使相当大的监管权力。我们将医疗保险改革分为四类:支付改革、福利改革、质量改革和管理,以及私营保险计划的作用(Medicare Advantage [MA])。
{"title":"The Transformation of Medicare, 2015 to 2030","authors":"H. Aaron, R. Reischauer","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2015-0043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2015-0043","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Medicare today is a better program on almost every dimension than it was just after July 30, 1965 when Lyndon Johnson signed public law 89–97. Nonetheless, short-comings, limitations, and inadequacies remain. What should be done to make Medicare a better program? What should Medicare look like in 2030? In this paper we try to answer these questions. Three perspectives are relevant: that of beneficiaries, current and future; that of policymakers and administrators, the program’s stewards; and that of society at large. We posit certain objectives and goals that we believe – and that we think a broad swath of Americans would agree – should be pursued to improve the Medicare program. Those goals include (a) affordability for Medicare beneficiaries, (b) affordability for the working population that is paying and should continue to pay for much of the current cost of the program, (c) reduction in what we regard as needless complexity, and (d) stability and continuity in several different senses. We restrict ourselves to changes that we judge to be affordable and feasible – politically, technically, and administratively – if not today, then over the next decade or two. We believe that changes in Medicare will remain incremental, as they have been for the last 50 years. We shall assume that the ACA takes root and that the exchanges, whether managed by states or by the federal government on behalf of the states, continue to operate. We shall assume that federal and state officials eventually surmount the administrative challenges they still confront. In particular, we assume that the exchanges come to serve a growing share of the American population and that they increasingly exercise the rather considerable regulatory powers over insurance offerings that the ACA grants to them. We divide Medicare reforms into four categories: payment reform, benefit reform, quality reform and management, and the role of private insurance plans (Medicare Advantage [MA]).","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79699255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Health and Health Care of Medicare Beneficiaries in 2030. 2030年医疗保险受益人的健康和医疗保健。
Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2015-12-01 Epub Date: 2015-11-28 DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2015-0037
Étienne Gaudette, Bryan Tysinger, Alwyn Cassil, Dana P Goldman

On Medicare's 50th anniversary, we use the Future Elderly Model (FEM) - a microsimulation model of health and economic outcomes for older Americans - to generate a snapshot of changing Medicare demographics and spending between 2010 and 2030. During this period, the baby boomers, who began turning 65 and aging into Medicare in 2011, will drive Medicare demographic changes, swelling the estimated US population aged 65 or older from 39.7 million to 67.0 million. Among the risks for Medicare sustainability, the size of the elderly population in the future likely will have the highest impact on spending but is easiest to forecast. Population health and the proportion of the future elderly with disabilities are more uncertain, though tools such as the FEM can provide reasonable forecasts to guide policymakers. Finally, medical technology breakthroughs and their effect on longevity are most uncertain and perhaps riskiest. Policymakers will need to keep these risks in mind if Medicare is to be sustained for another 50 years. Policymakers may also want to monitor the equity of Medicare financing amid signs that the program's progressivity is declining, resulting in higher-income people benefiting relatively more from Medicare than lower-income people.

在医疗保险50周年之际,我们使用未来老年人模型(FEM)——一个美国老年人健康和经济结果的微观模拟模型——来生成2010年至2030年间医疗保险人口结构和支出变化的快照。在此期间,婴儿潮一代(从2011年开始步入65岁并进入联邦医疗保险年龄)将推动联邦医疗保险人口结构的变化,使美国65岁及以上的人口从3970万增加到6700万。在医疗保险可持续性的风险中,未来老年人口的规模可能会对支出产生最大的影响,但也是最容易预测的。人口健康和未来残疾老年人的比例更加不确定,尽管FEM等工具可以提供合理的预测,以指导决策者。最后,医疗技术的突破及其对寿命的影响是最不确定的,或许也是最危险的。如果联邦医疗保险计划要再维持50年,政策制定者需要牢记这些风险。政策制定者可能还希望监测医疗保险融资的公平性,因为有迹象表明,该计划的累进性正在下降,导致高收入人群从医疗保险中获得的收益相对高于低收入人群。
{"title":"Health and Health Care of Medicare Beneficiaries in 2030.","authors":"Étienne Gaudette,&nbsp;Bryan Tysinger,&nbsp;Alwyn Cassil,&nbsp;Dana P Goldman","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2015-0037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2015-0037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On Medicare's 50th anniversary, we use the Future Elderly Model (FEM) - a microsimulation model of health and economic outcomes for older Americans - to generate a snapshot of changing Medicare demographics and spending between 2010 and 2030. During this period, the baby boomers, who began turning 65 and aging into Medicare in 2011, will drive Medicare demographic changes, swelling the estimated US population aged 65 or older from 39.7 million to 67.0 million. Among the risks for Medicare sustainability, the size of the elderly population in the future likely will have the highest impact on spending but is easiest to forecast. Population health and the proportion of the future elderly with disabilities are more uncertain, though tools such as the FEM can provide reasonable forecasts to guide policymakers. Finally, medical technology breakthroughs and their effect on longevity are most uncertain and perhaps riskiest. Policymakers will need to keep these risks in mind if Medicare is to be sustained for another 50 years. Policymakers may also want to monitor the equity of Medicare financing amid signs that the program's progressivity is declining, resulting in higher-income people benefiting relatively more from Medicare than lower-income people.</p>","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/fhep-2015-0037","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34502546","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40
Revamping Provider Payment in Medicare 改革医疗保险提供商支付
Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2015-0044
P. Ginsburg, G. Wilensky
{"title":"Revamping Provider Payment in Medicare","authors":"P. Ginsburg, G. Wilensky","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2015-0044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2015-0044","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85689643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Trends in the Well-Being of the Aged and Their Prospects through 2030 《到2030年老年人福祉趋势及其前景》
Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/FHEP-2015-0039
Gary T. Burtless
The US population over 65 has seen significant and sustained improvement in its absolute and relative well-being over the past half century. This paper offers a survey of trends in old-age poverty, income, inequality, labor market activity, educational attainment, insurance coverage, and health status. It concludes with a brief discussion of whether the favorable trends of the past half century can continue in the next few decades. Even though the absolute and relative positions of the nation’s aged have steadily improved over time, much of the improvement is traceable to public programs like Social Security and Medicare. These programs face gloomy financial prospects. If future voters and lawmakers scale back benefits to keep payroll taxes close to their current level, the nation’s elderly will need to rely on private resources to pay for a bigger fraction of their retirement needs. The statistics on saving and wealth accumulation suggest that relatively few working-age Americans plan to accomplish this by increasing the share of their current incomes they devote to saving. The future economic well-being of the elderly may therefore depend on their willingness to work longer and delay the age at which they rely on public programs and private savings to pay for their consumption.
在过去的半个世纪里,美国65岁以上人口的绝对和相对幸福感都有了显著和持续的改善。本文对老年贫困、收入、不平等、劳动力市场活动、受教育程度、保险覆盖率和健康状况的趋势进行了调查。文章最后简要讨论了过去半个世纪的有利趋势能否在未来几十年继续下去。尽管随着时间的推移,美国老年人的绝对地位和相对地位都在稳步改善,但大部分改善都要归功于社会保障(Social Security)和医疗保险(Medicare)等公共项目。这些项目面临着黯淡的财政前景。如果未来的选民和立法者缩减福利以保持工资税接近目前的水平,那么美国的老年人将需要依靠私人资源来支付他们退休需求的更大一部分。有关储蓄和财富积累的统计数据表明,相对较少的处于工作年龄的美国人计划通过增加他们当前收入中用于储蓄的份额来实现这一目标。因此,老年人未来的经济福利可能取决于他们是否愿意工作更长时间,并推迟依靠公共项目和私人储蓄来支付消费的年龄。
{"title":"Trends in the Well-Being of the Aged and Their Prospects through 2030","authors":"Gary T. Burtless","doi":"10.1515/FHEP-2015-0039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/FHEP-2015-0039","url":null,"abstract":"The US population over 65 has seen significant and sustained improvement in its absolute and relative well-being over the past half century. This paper offers a survey of trends in old-age poverty, income, inequality, labor market activity, educational attainment, insurance coverage, and health status. It concludes with a brief discussion of whether the favorable trends of the past half century can continue in the next few decades. Even though the absolute and relative positions of the nation’s aged have steadily improved over time, much of the improvement is traceable to public programs like Social Security and Medicare. These programs face gloomy financial prospects. If future voters and lawmakers scale back benefits to keep payroll taxes close to their current level, the nation’s elderly will need to rely on private resources to pay for a bigger fraction of their retirement needs. The statistics on saving and wealth accumulation suggest that relatively few working-age Americans plan to accomplish this by increasing the share of their current incomes they devote to saving. The future economic well-being of the elderly may therefore depend on their willingness to work longer and delay the age at which they rely on public programs and private savings to pay for their consumption.","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86470715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Could Improving Choice and Competition in Medicare Advantage be the Future of Medicare? 改善医疗保险优势的选择和竞争能成为医疗保险的未来吗?
Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2015-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2015-0046
A. Rivlin, Willemsen Daniel
Abstract About 30 percent of Medicare beneficiaries enroll in private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans but do so at a relatively high-cost. This paper explores the advantages and challenges of introducing competitive bidding among MA plans (Plan One) or among MA plans and Fee-for-Service (Plan Two or Premium Support). We conclude that competitive bidding could reduce the cost of Medicare, especially in densely populated urban areas. However, there would be serious challenges in rural areas and risk adjustment methodology would have to be substantially improved. In Plan Two, sicker beneficiaries might move to Fee-for-Service and beneficiaries might have to pay more to stay with a preferred provider or broader network. If these problems are addressed, we believe that premium support can be a meaningful improvement to the MA program.
大约30%的医疗保险受益人参加私人医疗保险优势(MA)计划,但这样做的成本相对较高。本文探讨了在MA计划(计划一)或MA计划和按服务收费(计划二或高级支持)之间引入竞争性招标的优势和挑战。我们的结论是,竞争性招标可以降低医疗保险的成本,特别是在人口密集的城市地区。但是,农村地区将面临严重的挑战,必须大大改进风险调整方法。在计划二中,病情较重的受益人可能会转向按服务收费,而受益人可能需要支付更多的费用才能留在首选的医疗机构或更广泛的医疗网络中。如果这些问题得到解决,我们相信溢价支持可以对硕士项目有意义的改进。
{"title":"Could Improving Choice and Competition in Medicare Advantage be the Future of Medicare?","authors":"A. Rivlin, Willemsen Daniel","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2015-0046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2015-0046","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract About 30 percent of Medicare beneficiaries enroll in private Medicare Advantage (MA) plans but do so at a relatively high-cost. This paper explores the advantages and challenges of introducing competitive bidding among MA plans (Plan One) or among MA plans and Fee-for-Service (Plan Two or Premium Support). We conclude that competitive bidding could reduce the cost of Medicare, especially in densely populated urban areas. However, there would be serious challenges in rural areas and risk adjustment methodology would have to be substantially improved. In Plan Two, sicker beneficiaries might move to Fee-for-Service and beneficiaries might have to pay more to stay with a preferred provider or broader network. If these problems are addressed, we believe that premium support can be a meaningful improvement to the MA program.","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74383235","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Sex-selective Abortion Bans are Not Associated with Changes in Sex Ratios at Birth among Asian Populations in Illinois and Pennsylvania 性别选择性堕胎禁令与伊利诺斯州和宾夕法尼亚州亚裔人口出生性别比变化无关
Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2014-0018
Arindam Nandi, Sital Kalantry, B. Citro
Abstract Legal prohibitions on sex-selective abortions are proliferating in the United States. Eight state legislatures have banned abortions sought on the basis of the sex of the fetus, 21 states have considered such laws since 2009, and a similar bill is pending in U.S. Congress. These laws have been introduced and enacted without any empirical data about their impact or effectiveness. Prior studies of U.S. Census data found sex ratios among foreign-born Chinese, Korean and Indian immigrants were skewed in favor of boys, but only in families where there were already one or two girls. Using the variation in the timing of bans in Illinois and Pennsylvania as natural experiments, we compare the pre-ban and post-ban sex ratios of certain Asian newborn children in these states over 12-year periods. We then compare these ratios with the sex ratios of Asian newborn children in neighboring states during the same period. We find that the bans in Illinois and Pennsylvania are not associated with any changes in sex ratios at birth among Asians. In Illinois and its neighboring states, the sex ratio at birth of Asian children was not male-biased during our study period. On the other hand, the sex ratio at birth among Asians in Pennsylvania and its neighboring states was skewed slightly in favor of boys, but the enactment of the ban did not normalize the sex ratio. This strongly suggests that sex-selective abortion bans have had no impact on the practice of sex selection, to the extent that it occurs, in these states. This finding is highly relevant to legislative and policy debates in the U.S. Congress and state legislatures where sex-selective abortion laws are being considered.
在美国,禁止性别选择性堕胎的法律正在激增。八个州的立法机构已经禁止基于胎儿性别的堕胎,自2009年以来,已有21个州考虑过此类法律,美国国会也正在审议一项类似的法案。这些法律是在没有任何关于其影响或有效性的经验数据的情况下提出和颁布的。先前对美国人口普查数据的研究发现,在外国出生的中国、韩国和印度移民中,性别比例倾向于男孩,但仅限于已经有一两个女孩的家庭。利用伊利诺斯州和宾夕法尼亚州禁令时间的变化作为自然实验,我们比较了禁令前和禁令后这些州某些亚洲新生儿在12年期间的性别比例。然后,我们将这些比率与同期邻国亚洲新生儿的性别比率进行比较。我们发现伊利诺斯州和宾夕法尼亚州的禁令与亚洲出生性别比的任何变化无关。在我们的研究期间,在伊利诺斯州及其邻近州,亚裔儿童出生时的性别比例并没有出现男性偏倚。另一方面,宾夕法尼亚州及其邻近州的亚裔出生性别比略微偏向男孩,但该禁令的颁布并没有使性别比例正常化。这强烈表明,性别选择性堕胎禁令对性别选择的实践没有影响,就这些州发生的情况而言。这一发现与正在考虑性别选择性堕胎法的美国国会和州立法机构的立法和政策辩论高度相关。
{"title":"Sex-selective Abortion Bans are Not Associated with Changes in Sex Ratios at Birth among Asian Populations in Illinois and Pennsylvania","authors":"Arindam Nandi, Sital Kalantry, B. Citro","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2014-0018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2014-0018","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Legal prohibitions on sex-selective abortions are proliferating in the United States. Eight state legislatures have banned abortions sought on the basis of the sex of the fetus, 21 states have considered such laws since 2009, and a similar bill is pending in U.S. Congress. These laws have been introduced and enacted without any empirical data about their impact or effectiveness. Prior studies of U.S. Census data found sex ratios among foreign-born Chinese, Korean and Indian immigrants were skewed in favor of boys, but only in families where there were already one or two girls. Using the variation in the timing of bans in Illinois and Pennsylvania as natural experiments, we compare the pre-ban and post-ban sex ratios of certain Asian newborn children in these states over 12-year periods. We then compare these ratios with the sex ratios of Asian newborn children in neighboring states during the same period. We find that the bans in Illinois and Pennsylvania are not associated with any changes in sex ratios at birth among Asians. In Illinois and its neighboring states, the sex ratio at birth of Asian children was not male-biased during our study period. On the other hand, the sex ratio at birth among Asians in Pennsylvania and its neighboring states was skewed slightly in favor of boys, but the enactment of the ban did not normalize the sex ratio. This strongly suggests that sex-selective abortion bans have had no impact on the practice of sex selection, to the extent that it occurs, in these states. This finding is highly relevant to legislative and policy debates in the U.S. Congress and state legislatures where sex-selective abortion laws are being considered.","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79408534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Long-Term Effects of Tobacco Prices Faced by Adolescents 青少年面临的烟草价格的长期影响
Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2014-0005
M. Auld, M. Zarrabi
Abstract Tobacco taxes in Canada varied markedly across time and across regions in the early 1990s. We exploit this variation to estimate the long reach of prices faced in adolescence on smoking behavior roughly a decade later in early to mid-adulthood. Results from a variety of econometric approaches suggest that there is a small but detectable long-run effect of price faced during adolescence. A 10% increase in prices faced during adolescence, holding contemporaneous prices constant, leads to roughly a 1% reduction in adult smoking propensity and intensity. The results are somewhat sensitive to specification and to how price during adolescence is measured.
20世纪90年代初,加拿大的烟草税在不同的时间和地区之间存在显著差异。我们利用这种变化来估计大约十年后,即成年早期到中期,青少年所面临的价格对吸烟行为的长期影响。各种计量经济学方法的结果表明,青少年时期面临的价格有一个小但可检测的长期影响。在保持同期价格不变的情况下,青少年时期面临的价格增加10%,会导致成人吸烟倾向和强度减少大约1%。结果对规格和如何衡量青少年时期的价格有些敏感。
{"title":"Long-Term Effects of Tobacco Prices Faced by Adolescents","authors":"M. Auld, M. Zarrabi","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2014-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2014-0005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Tobacco taxes in Canada varied markedly across time and across regions in the early 1990s. We exploit this variation to estimate the long reach of prices faced in adolescence on smoking behavior roughly a decade later in early to mid-adulthood. Results from a variety of econometric approaches suggest that there is a small but detectable long-run effect of price faced during adolescence. A 10% increase in prices faced during adolescence, holding contemporaneous prices constant, leads to roughly a 1% reduction in adult smoking propensity and intensity. The results are somewhat sensitive to specification and to how price during adolescence is measured.","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83325692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Public-Private Partnership as a Path to Affordable Healthcare in Emerging Markets 公私伙伴关系是新兴市场实现可负担医疗保健的途径
Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2014-0023
J. W. Chou, D. Lakdawalla, J. Vanderpuye-Orgle
Abstract The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) have experienced tremendous economic and health gains in recent decades. Two of the major health challenges faced by the BRICS and other low and middle income countries are decreasing inequity in health outcomes and increasing affordability of health insurance. One fiscally sustainable option for the BRICS governments is a public subsidy system for private health insurance plans. This essay lays out the potential applicability and impacts of public subsidies for private health insurance plans, as well as opportunities and challenges for implementation, in the BRICS countries. Overall, providing public subsidies rather than health insurance would enable the BRICS governments to avoid the open-ended financial liabilities that have plagued advanced economies, while still expanding access to health insurance and encouraging the develoment of a robust private health insurance market. We conclude by suggesting an array of pilot programs that could serve as the seeds for publicly subsidized health insurance schemes within the BRICS markets.
近几十年来,金砖国家(巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非)在经济和卫生方面取得了巨大成就。金砖国家和其他低收入和中等收入国家面临的两个主要卫生挑战是减少卫生结果的不平等和提高医疗保险的可负担性。金砖国家政府的一个财政可持续选择是对私人医疗保险计划实行公共补贴制度。本文阐述了金砖国家公共补贴对私营医疗保险计划的潜在适用性和影响,以及实施的机遇和挑战。总体而言,提供公共补贴而不是医疗保险,将使金砖国家政府能够避免发达经济体所面临的无止境的金融负债,同时还能扩大医疗保险的覆盖面,并鼓励发展强大的私人医疗保险市场。最后,我们提出了一系列试点方案,这些方案可以作为金砖国家市场内公共补贴医疗保险计划的种子。
{"title":"Public-Private Partnership as a Path to Affordable Healthcare in Emerging Markets","authors":"J. W. Chou, D. Lakdawalla, J. Vanderpuye-Orgle","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2014-0023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2014-0023","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) have experienced tremendous economic and health gains in recent decades. Two of the major health challenges faced by the BRICS and other low and middle income countries are decreasing inequity in health outcomes and increasing affordability of health insurance. One fiscally sustainable option for the BRICS governments is a public subsidy system for private health insurance plans. This essay lays out the potential applicability and impacts of public subsidies for private health insurance plans, as well as opportunities and challenges for implementation, in the BRICS countries. Overall, providing public subsidies rather than health insurance would enable the BRICS governments to avoid the open-ended financial liabilities that have plagued advanced economies, while still expanding access to health insurance and encouraging the develoment of a robust private health insurance market. We conclude by suggesting an array of pilot programs that could serve as the seeds for publicly subsidized health insurance schemes within the BRICS markets.","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83011524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
The Value of Delaying Alzheimer's Disease Onset. 延缓阿尔茨海默病发病的价值。
Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2014-11-01 Epub Date: 2014-11-04 DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2014-0013
Julie Zissimopoulos, Eileen Crimmins, Patricia St Clair

Alzheimer's disease (AD) extracts a heavy societal toll. The value of medical advances that delay onset of AD could be significant. Using data from nationally representative samples from the Health and Retirement Study (1998-2008) and Aging Demographics and Memory Study (2001-2009), we estimate the prevalence and incidence of AD and the formal and informal health care costs associated with it. We use microsimulation to project future prevalence and costs of AD under different treatment scenarios. We find from 2010 to 2050, the number of individuals ages 70+ with AD increases 153%, from 3.6 to 9.1 million, and annual costs increase from $307 billion ($181B formal, $126B informal costs) to $1.5 trillion. 2010 annual per person costs were $71,303 and double by 2050. Medicare and Medicaid are paying 75% of formal costs. Medical advances that delay onset of AD for 5 years result in 41% lower prevalence and 40% lower cost of AD in 2050. For one cohort of older individuals, who would go on to acquire AD, a 5-year delay leads to 2.7 additional life years (about 5 AD-free), slightly higher formal care costs due to longer life but lower informal care costs for a total value of $511,208 per person. We find Medical advances delaying onset of AD generate significant economic and longevity benefits. The findings inform clinicians, policymakers, businesses and the public about the value of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of AD.

阿尔茨海默病(AD)造成了严重的社会损失。延缓阿尔茨海默病发病的医学进步的价值可能是显著的。使用来自健康与退休研究(1998-2008)和老龄化人口统计与记忆研究(2001-2009)的全国代表性样本的数据,我们估计了AD的患病率和发病率以及与之相关的正式和非正式医疗保健费用。我们使用微观模拟来预测不同治疗方案下AD的未来患病率和成本。我们发现,从2010年到2050年,70岁以上的老年痴呆症患者人数增加了153%,从360万增加到910万,年成本从3070亿美元(1810亿美元正式成本,1260亿美元非正式成本)增加到1.5万亿美元。2010年人均医疗费用为71303美元,到2050年将翻一番。医疗保险和医疗补助支付75%的正式费用。到2050年,将阿尔茨海默病发病延迟5年的医学进步将使阿尔茨海默病的患病率降低41%,费用降低40%。对于一组会继续患上AD的老年人,5年的延迟导致2.7年的额外生命年(约5年无AD),由于寿命延长,正式护理费用略高,但非正式护理费用较低,人均总价值为511,208美元。我们发现医学上的进步延缓了阿尔茨海默病的发病,产生了显著的经济效益和长寿效益。这些发现让临床医生、政策制定者、企业和公众了解了预防、诊断和治疗阿尔茨海默病的价值。
{"title":"The Value of Delaying Alzheimer's Disease Onset.","authors":"Julie Zissimopoulos,&nbsp;Eileen Crimmins,&nbsp;Patricia St Clair","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2014-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2014-0013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alzheimer's disease (AD) extracts a heavy societal toll. The value of medical advances that delay onset of AD could be significant. Using data from nationally representative samples from the Health and Retirement Study (1998-2008) and Aging Demographics and Memory Study (2001-2009), we estimate the prevalence and incidence of AD and the formal and informal health care costs associated with it. We use microsimulation to project future prevalence and costs of AD under different treatment scenarios. We find from 2010 to 2050, the number of individuals ages 70+ with AD increases 153%, from 3.6 to 9.1 million, and annual costs increase from $307 billion ($181B formal, $126B informal costs) to $1.5 trillion. 2010 annual per person costs were $71,303 and double by 2050. Medicare and Medicaid are paying 75% of formal costs. Medical advances that delay onset of AD for 5 years result in 41% lower prevalence and 40% lower cost of AD in 2050. For one cohort of older individuals, who would go on to acquire AD, a 5-year delay leads to 2.7 additional life years (about 5 AD-free), slightly higher formal care costs due to longer life but lower informal care costs for a total value of $511,208 per person. We find Medical advances delaying onset of AD generate significant economic and longevity benefits. The findings inform clinicians, policymakers, businesses and the public about the value of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/fhep-2014-0013","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"34361480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 177
Retail Tobacco Display Bans 零售烟草陈列禁令
Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Pub Date : 2014-09-01 DOI: 10.1515/fhep-2013-0019
I. Irvine, V. Nguyen
Abstract Bans on retail tobacco displays, of the type proposed by New York’s Mayor Bloomberg in March 2013, have been operative in several economies since 2001. Despite an enormous number of studies in public health journals using attitudinal data, we can find no econometric event studies of the type normally used in Economics. This paper attempts to fill that gap by using data from 13 cross sections of the annual Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Surveys. These data afford an ideal opportunity to study events of this type given that each of Canada’s 10 provinces implemented display bans at various points between 2003 and 2009. Accordingly, we use difference-in-difference methods to study three behaviors following the introduction of bans: participation in smoking, the intensity of smoking and quit intentions. A critical element of the study concerns the treatment of contraband tobacco. Our estimates provide very little support for the hypothesis that behaviors changed following the bans.
纽约市长布隆伯格于2013年3月提议禁止零售烟草展示,自2001年以来已在几个经济体实施。尽管在公共卫生期刊上有大量使用态度数据的研究,但我们找不到经济学中通常使用的类型的计量经济学事件研究。本文试图通过使用来自加拿大年度烟草使用监测调查的13个横截面的数据来填补这一空白。这些数据为研究这类事件提供了一个理想的机会,因为加拿大10个省中的每个省在2003年至2009年的不同时间点都实施了展示禁令。因此,我们采用差异中差异的方法来研究禁令引入后的三种行为:吸烟参与、吸烟强度和戒烟意图。这项研究的一个关键因素涉及对走私烟草的处理。我们的估计对禁令后行为改变的假设提供了很少的支持。
{"title":"Retail Tobacco Display Bans","authors":"I. Irvine, V. Nguyen","doi":"10.1515/fhep-2013-0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/fhep-2013-0019","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Bans on retail tobacco displays, of the type proposed by New York’s Mayor Bloomberg in March 2013, have been operative in several economies since 2001. Despite an enormous number of studies in public health journals using attitudinal data, we can find no econometric event studies of the type normally used in Economics. This paper attempts to fill that gap by using data from 13 cross sections of the annual Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Surveys. These data afford an ideal opportunity to study events of this type given that each of Canada’s 10 provinces implemented display bans at various points between 2003 and 2009. Accordingly, we use difference-in-difference methods to study three behaviors following the introduction of bans: participation in smoking, the intensity of smoking and quit intentions. A critical element of the study concerns the treatment of contraband tobacco. Our estimates provide very little support for the hypothesis that behaviors changed following the bans.","PeriodicalId":38039,"journal":{"name":"Forum for Health Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82740935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Forum for Health Economics and Policy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1