Pub Date : 2022-09-02DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2022.2135689
N. Descalzo-Ruiz
The quasi-experimental conditions of the global COVID-19 lockdown can illuminate new paths for our role as stewards of nature. On April 5th, 2020, it was estimated that 4.4 billion people were a ff ected by lockdown measures (i.e. 57% of the world ’ s population). First impressions and reports led to the belief that reducing human presence and mobility only positively a ff ected ecosystems. However, a more detailed and area-speci fi c analysis reveals that humans also have a key role as custodians of nature, which was also negatively impacted by the lockdown. In Bates et al. (2021), nearly 350 scientists present data from 67 di ff erent countries about the e ff ects of the global COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 on the relationship of humans with wildlife and ecosystems. The study aggregates media reports, qualitative observations, and more than 300 responses on wildlife using data provided by scienti fi c monitoring programmes covering large geographic areas. In total, more than 1.000 assessments are integrated to under-stand both the positive and negative e ff ects of the lockdown and how these interact in four main areas: 1) human mobility and activity, 2) biodiversity threats, 3) wildlife responses, and 4) social structures and systems for conservation. In a highly intercon-nected globalised society, in a matter of days, air travel decreased by 75%, driving by 41%, and marine tra ffi c by 9%, while humans stayed most of their time at home. This phenomenon, which provides quasi-experimental conditions for studying the impact of human activity on nature, was named anthropause by Rutz et al. (2020). The fi rst set of observations of Bates et al. (2021) renders visible the unexpected negative consequences of the lack of human presence, surveillance, and active conservation e ff orts for biodiversity. In countries where outdoor activities were allowed, visits to
全球COVID-19封锁的准实验条件可以为我们作为自然管家的角色照亮新的道路。2020年4月5日，据估计有44亿人受到封锁措施的影响(占世界人口的57%)。第一印象和报告导致人们相信，减少人类的存在和流动性只会对生态系统产生积极影响。然而，更详细和具体地区的分析表明，人类作为自然的守护者也发挥着关键作用，这也受到了封锁的负面影响。在Bates et al.(2021)中，近350名科学家提供了来自67个不同国家的数据，说明2020年全球COVID-19封锁对人类与野生动物和生态系统关系的影响。这项研究汇总了媒体报道、定性观察和300多个关于野生动物的回应，这些回应使用了覆盖大地理区域的科学监测项目提供的数据。总共整合了1000多项评估，以了解封锁的积极和消极影响，以及这些影响如何在四个主要领域相互作用:1)人类流动性和活动，2)生物多样性威胁，3)野生动物反应，以及4)保护的社会结构和系统。在一个高度相互联系的全球化社会中，在短短几天内，航空旅行减少了75%，驾驶减少了41%，海上交通减少了9%，而人类大部分时间都呆在家里。这种现象为研究人类活动对自然的影响提供了准实验条件，Rutz et al.(2020)将其命名为anthropause。Bates等人(2021年)的第一组观察结果表明，缺乏人类存在、监督和积极保护生物多样性的努力所带来的意想不到的负面后果是显而易见的。在允许户外活动的国家，参观
{"title":"Global COVID-19 lockdown highlights humans as both threats and custodians of the environment. Biological Conservation, 263, 109175","authors":"N. Descalzo-Ruiz","doi":"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2135689","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2135689","url":null,"abstract":"The quasi-experimental conditions of the global COVID-19 lockdown can illuminate new paths for our role as stewards of nature. On April 5th, 2020, it was estimated that 4.4 billion people were a ff ected by lockdown measures (i.e. 57% of the world ’ s population). First impressions and reports led to the belief that reducing human presence and mobility only positively a ff ected ecosystems. However, a more detailed and area-speci fi c analysis reveals that humans also have a key role as custodians of nature, which was also negatively impacted by the lockdown. In Bates et al. (2021), nearly 350 scientists present data from 67 di ff erent countries about the e ff ects of the global COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 on the relationship of humans with wildlife and ecosystems. The study aggregates media reports, qualitative observations, and more than 300 responses on wildlife using data provided by scienti fi c monitoring programmes covering large geographic areas. In total, more than 1.000 assessments are integrated to under-stand both the positive and negative e ff ects of the lockdown and how these interact in four main areas: 1) human mobility and activity, 2) biodiversity threats, 3) wildlife responses, and 4) social structures and systems for conservation. In a highly intercon-nected globalised society, in a matter of days, air travel decreased by 75%, driving by 41%, and marine tra ffi c by 9%, while humans stayed most of their time at home. This phenomenon, which provides quasi-experimental conditions for studying the impact of human activity on nature, was named anthropause by Rutz et al. (2020). The fi rst set of observations of Bates et al. (2021) renders visible the unexpected negative consequences of the lack of human presence, surveillance, and active conservation e ff orts for biodiversity. In countries where outdoor activities were allowed, visits to","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43565073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-09-02DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2022.2146151
O. Apostol
ABSTRACT Accounting and corruption exist in a tense relationship in which accounting is either the solution to or an accomplice of corruption. Diverse areas of accounting research have examined both sides of this relationship, but social and environmental accounting (SEA) scholarship has lagged well behind. This is unfortunate, as venality has dreadful impacts on society and the natural environment. This commentary invites SEA scholars to shed light on the intricate bonds between accounting, corruption and sustainability. To support my argument, I explain why corruption matters to SEA and review prior studies that examine the intersection of these two areas. Building on extant accounting research on corruption, I argue that future research should explore the effects of the new public management (NPM) type of anticorruption reforms on the social and environmental agenda. I maintain that, when used, NPM practices should be adapted to local settings. I also make a case for exploring the potential of locally informed accounting practices to curb corruption that affects sustainability practices.
{"title":"Accounting for Anticorruption: Where Are the Social and Environmental Accounting Scholars?","authors":"O. Apostol","doi":"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2146151","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2146151","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Accounting and corruption exist in a tense relationship in which accounting is either the solution to or an accomplice of corruption. Diverse areas of accounting research have examined both sides of this relationship, but social and environmental accounting (SEA) scholarship has lagged well behind. This is unfortunate, as venality has dreadful impacts on society and the natural environment. This commentary invites SEA scholars to shed light on the intricate bonds between accounting, corruption and sustainability. To support my argument, I explain why corruption matters to SEA and review prior studies that examine the intersection of these two areas. Building on extant accounting research on corruption, I argue that future research should explore the effects of the new public management (NPM) type of anticorruption reforms on the social and environmental agenda. I maintain that, when used, NPM practices should be adapted to local settings. I also make a case for exploring the potential of locally informed accounting practices to curb corruption that affects sustainability practices.","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"59637379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-08-26DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2022.2115633
Elena Carrión
{"title":"Policy and Accounting Implications for Ocean Sustainability: Exploring the Ocean 100 Keystone Actors","authors":"Elena Carrión","doi":"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2115633","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2115633","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42285896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-07-05DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2022.2094983
Colin Dey, S. Russell
ABSTRACT Socio-ecological crises in the Anthropocene are shaking the assumptions, norms and practices of many disciplines. The climate emergency and the COVID-19 pandemic have substantially disrupted academic work and life with calls to return to normal, embrace change and many other options in between. Here, we invite critical discussion and reflection amongst the Centre for Social & Environmental Accounting Research (CSEAR) community on our collective reliance on international in-person conferences and associated air travel. In doing so, we seek to highlight the ways in which our intellectual and practical endeavours are increasingly being shaped by both the climate crisis and debates around post-pandemic academia. We also report on the results of a (pre-pandemic) survey of the CSEAR community, which reveals highly differentiated patterns of air travel, echoing global patterns of dependency and inequality. Following this, we outline various practical solutions that have been proposed or introduced at individual, institutional and community levels. These include recent grassroots campaigns which have sought to mobilise opinion around the issues and explore different practices and modes of organising knowledge production, as well as the work of other academic communities attempting to enact commitments to lower their carbon emissions. Finally, we briefly outline the wider contours around low carbon scholarship and conclude by considering whether this is sufficient to contribute to collective efforts for scholarship for sustainability.
{"title":"Still Flying in the Face of Low-carbon Scholarship? A Final Call for the CSEAR Community to Get on Board","authors":"Colin Dey, S. Russell","doi":"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2094983","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2094983","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Socio-ecological crises in the Anthropocene are shaking the assumptions, norms and practices of many disciplines. The climate emergency and the COVID-19 pandemic have substantially disrupted academic work and life with calls to return to normal, embrace change and many other options in between. Here, we invite critical discussion and reflection amongst the Centre for Social & Environmental Accounting Research (CSEAR) community on our collective reliance on international in-person conferences and associated air travel. In doing so, we seek to highlight the ways in which our intellectual and practical endeavours are increasingly being shaped by both the climate crisis and debates around post-pandemic academia. We also report on the results of a (pre-pandemic) survey of the CSEAR community, which reveals highly differentiated patterns of air travel, echoing global patterns of dependency and inequality. Following this, we outline various practical solutions that have been proposed or introduced at individual, institutional and community levels. These include recent grassroots campaigns which have sought to mobilise opinion around the issues and explore different practices and modes of organising knowledge production, as well as the work of other academic communities attempting to enact commitments to lower their carbon emissions. Finally, we briefly outline the wider contours around low carbon scholarship and conclude by considering whether this is sufficient to contribute to collective efforts for scholarship for sustainability.","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44592478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-05DOI: 10.1080/0969160x.2022.2085130
J. Andrew
{"title":"A Tribute to the Life and Scholarship of Conny Beck","authors":"J. Andrew","doi":"10.1080/0969160x.2022.2085130","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160x.2022.2085130","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48280061","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-25DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2022.2079896
Lies Bouten
{"title":"Breaking boundaries: (counter) accounts during the pandemic – letters for future generations","authors":"Lies Bouten","doi":"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2079896","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2079896","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44781451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-04DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2022.2066554
M. Brander
ABSTRACT I suggest that the SEA research community has not engaged significantly with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change because our community generally does not offer normative policy-focused advice on how to account for climate change. This raises the question ‘Why not?’. It cannot be because there is no demand for normative accounting guidance, as examples of this need abound everywhere. And it cannot be because normativity is ‘not academic’ as other academic disciplines engage in normative research, notably the fields of economics and life cycle assessment. The SEA research community may be constrained by its social constructivist epistemology, its focus on explanatory theory which drives us towards explanatory rather than normative questions, and our training in social science research methods rather than direct engagement with how to do social and environmental accounting. Notwithstanding the challenges there is a pressing need for better accounting practice, and who better to develop methods for social and environmental accounting than the social and environmental accounting research community? Arguably, there should be more normative research on how social and environmental accounting should be done.
{"title":"There Should be More Normative Research on How Social and Environmental Accounting Should be Done","authors":"M. Brander","doi":"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2066554","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2066554","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT I suggest that the SEA research community has not engaged significantly with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change because our community generally does not offer normative policy-focused advice on how to account for climate change. This raises the question ‘Why not?’. It cannot be because there is no demand for normative accounting guidance, as examples of this need abound everywhere. And it cannot be because normativity is ‘not academic’ as other academic disciplines engage in normative research, notably the fields of economics and life cycle assessment. The SEA research community may be constrained by its social constructivist epistemology, its focus on explanatory theory which drives us towards explanatory rather than normative questions, and our training in social science research methods rather than direct engagement with how to do social and environmental accounting. Notwithstanding the challenges there is a pressing need for better accounting practice, and who better to develop methods for social and environmental accounting than the social and environmental accounting research community? Arguably, there should be more normative research on how social and environmental accounting should be done.","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45489862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-05-04DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2022.2085131
I. Thomson, Robert Charnock
ABSTRACT The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has entered a new era, with insights from the social sciences now seen as critical to informing global policymaking decisions on the climate crisis. Previously, economists dominated the social science contribution through their proactive engagement with climate related intergovernmental bodies such as the IPCC. While this dominance has been criticised by academics from other disciplines, arguably they were somewhat complicit by their silence or assumptions that they would be sought out for input. It is worth noting that the IPCC does not commission research, but rather derives all its findings from existing scientific publications. However, the IPCC scientists need to know where to look for this work and for the content of these publications to be easily assimilated into their interdisciplinary deliberative processes .
{"title":"Engaging with the IPCC on Climate Finance: A Call to Action and Platform for Social and Environmental Accounting Scholars","authors":"I. Thomson, Robert Charnock","doi":"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2085131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2085131","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has entered a new era, with insights from the social sciences now seen as critical to informing global policymaking decisions on the climate crisis. Previously, economists dominated the social science contribution through their proactive engagement with climate related intergovernmental bodies such as the IPCC. While this dominance has been criticised by academics from other disciplines, arguably they were somewhat complicit by their silence or assumptions that they would be sought out for input. It is worth noting that the IPCC does not commission research, but rather derives all its findings from existing scientific publications. However, the IPCC scientists need to know where to look for this work and for the content of these publications to be easily assimilated into their interdisciplinary deliberative processes .","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46590031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-04-22DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2022.2066553
Raeni Raeni, I. Thomson, A. Frandsen
ABSTRACT Mobilising sufficient financial resources for low carbon development has led to countries integrating green bonds into their sovereign bond portfolios. However, questions remain over the efficacy and integrity of these financial instruments. Climate bonds impose additional accountability requirements that connect the money raised with actions to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gases. These requirements are given further prominence in financial instruments intended to fund climate change while complying with core Islamic values, such as the green sukuk, a Sharia-compliant alternative to traditional fixed-income investments to fund environmental projects. Climate-related financial instruments require tracking the flow of money through chains of decisions within and between organisations. This research explores how the Indonesian government, as the first sovereign state issuer of green sukuk, attempted to connect money raised from Islamic capital markets to actual reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. This required the creation of new accounting objects that connected financial data with GHG accounting at a granular level. Our analysis demonstrates how the existing accounting systems were repurposed by constructing green sukuk accounting objects that sought to connect equivalent disbursements of money with social and environmental benefits, primarily represented by reduced GHG emissions.
{"title":"Mobilising Islamic Funds for Climate Actions: From Transparency to Traceability","authors":"Raeni Raeni, I. Thomson, A. Frandsen","doi":"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2066553","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2066553","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Mobilising sufficient financial resources for low carbon development has led to countries integrating green bonds into their sovereign bond portfolios. However, questions remain over the efficacy and integrity of these financial instruments. Climate bonds impose additional accountability requirements that connect the money raised with actions to reduce atmospheric greenhouse gases. These requirements are given further prominence in financial instruments intended to fund climate change while complying with core Islamic values, such as the green sukuk, a Sharia-compliant alternative to traditional fixed-income investments to fund environmental projects. Climate-related financial instruments require tracking the flow of money through chains of decisions within and between organisations. This research explores how the Indonesian government, as the first sovereign state issuer of green sukuk, attempted to connect money raised from Islamic capital markets to actual reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. This required the creation of new accounting objects that connected financial data with GHG accounting at a granular level. Our analysis demonstrates how the existing accounting systems were repurposed by constructing green sukuk accounting objects that sought to connect equivalent disbursements of money with social and environmental benefits, primarily represented by reduced GHG emissions.","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46164515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-30DOI: 10.1080/0969160X.2022.2057664
Z. Daruwala
cal contributions, not least in bringing attention to the public sector rather than corporate reporting practices when it comes to biodiversity loss, as well as to the top-down character of the global frameworks such as the SDGs. By revealing that efforts to impose top-down indicators are unlikely to result in forms of calculability that would help governments effectively address the challenges in question, this study questions the implementation of any global agenda and stimulates future research to explore such topics as bottom-up development of performance measures, or flexibility of indicators and targets in the context of sustainable development.
{"title":"Fossil Fuel Reserves and Resources Reporting and Unburnable Carbon: Investigating Conflicting Accounts","authors":"Z. Daruwala","doi":"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2057664","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2057664","url":null,"abstract":"cal contributions, not least in bringing attention to the public sector rather than corporate reporting practices when it comes to biodiversity loss, as well as to the top-down character of the global frameworks such as the SDGs. By revealing that efforts to impose top-down indicators are unlikely to result in forms of calculability that would help governments effectively address the challenges in question, this study questions the implementation of any global agenda and stimulates future research to explore such topics as bottom-up development of performance measures, or flexibility of indicators and targets in the context of sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46738958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：