首页 > 最新文献

Historein最新文献

英文 中文
The Catholic Communities of the Aegean Archipelago during the Greek Revolution, 1821–1830 1821-1830年希腊革命期间爱琴海群岛的天主教社区
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-01-07 DOI: 10.12681/historein.25559
Dimitris Kousouris
The Catholics of the Aegean islands represent a rather neglected subject in the story of the Greek War of Independence. As these communities enjoyed a large degree of autonomy from the Sublime Porte, were under French protection and participated in the global network of the Catholic Church, their integration into the Greek state was difficult. The frictions between insurgents and island Latins, the attempts of the Greek government to impose its authority, the efforts of those communities to mobilise their regional and international networks in order to maintain autonomy and their ultimate acceptance of the description “Greeks of the Western Church” attributed to them by the insurgents demonstrates that the making of the Greek nation was an open-ended process, providing valuable insights into the transition from a prenational/extraterritorial conception of sovereignty to a national/territorial one.
在希腊独立战争的故事中,爱琴海岛屿上的天主教徒是一个相当被忽视的主题。由于这些社区享有很大程度的自治权,受到法国的保护,并参与天主教会的全球网络,因此很难融入希腊国家。叛乱分子和岛上拉丁人之间的摩擦,希腊政府试图强加其权威,这些社区努力动员其区域和国际网络以保持自治,以及他们最终接受叛乱分子对他们的“西方教会的希腊人”的描述,表明希腊民族的形成是一个无止境的过程,对从国家前/域外主权概念过渡到国家/领土主权概念提供了宝贵的见解。
{"title":"The Catholic Communities of the Aegean Archipelago during the Greek Revolution, 1821–1830","authors":"Dimitris Kousouris","doi":"10.12681/historein.25559","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/historein.25559","url":null,"abstract":"The Catholics of the Aegean islands represent a rather neglected subject in the story of the Greek War of Independence. As these communities enjoyed a large degree of autonomy from the Sublime Porte, were under French protection and participated in the global network of the Catholic Church, their integration into the Greek state was difficult. The frictions between insurgents and island Latins, the attempts of the Greek government to impose its authority, the efforts of those communities to mobilise their regional and international networks in order to maintain autonomy and their ultimate acceptance of the description “Greeks of the Western Church” attributed to them by the insurgents demonstrates that the making of the Greek nation was an open-ended process, providing valuable insights into the transition from a prenational/extraterritorial conception of sovereignty to a national/territorial one.","PeriodicalId":38128,"journal":{"name":"Historein","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43225313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Imperial Rhetoric and Revolutionary Practice: The Greek 1821 帝国修辞与革命实践:1821年的希腊
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-01-07 DOI: 10.12681/historein.27480
Ada A. Dialla
The article focuses on the revolutionary period of 1821 and examines how the bloody uprising of the Greeks against the Ottomans, in conjunction with the international environment, transformed the notion of the nation. Before the revolution, the term “nation” had mostly cultural connotations and, from a political point of view, was a neutral category within an imperial framework, without claims to be the primary and the dominant element of political identity. The revolutionary period transformed the perception of the nation into an active political and social force and into the most important actor/subject of the historical and political processes.
这篇文章聚焦于1821年的革命时期,探讨了希腊人反抗奥斯曼人的血腥起义,以及国际环境如何改变了国家的概念。在革命之前,“国家”一词主要具有文化内涵,从政治角度来看,它是帝国框架内的一个中立类别,并不声称是政治身份的主要和主导因素。革命时期将国家观念转变为一股积极的政治和社会力量,并成为历史和政治进程中最重要的行动者/主体。
{"title":"Imperial Rhetoric and Revolutionary Practice: The Greek 1821","authors":"Ada A. Dialla","doi":"10.12681/historein.27480","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/historein.27480","url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the revolutionary period of 1821 and examines how the bloody uprising of the Greeks against the Ottomans, in conjunction with the international environment, transformed the notion of the nation. Before the revolution, the term “nation” had mostly cultural connotations and, from a political point of view, was a neutral category within an imperial framework, without claims to be the primary and the dominant element of political identity. The revolutionary period transformed the perception of the nation into an active political and social force and into the most important actor/subject of the historical and political processes.","PeriodicalId":38128,"journal":{"name":"Historein","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43207613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
French Involvement in the Greek War of Independence 法国卷入希腊独立战争
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2022-01-07 DOI: 10.12681/historein.25062
Anna Karakatsouli
During the wars of the eighteenth century France lost most of its colonies. By 1821 the Restoration had also negated all the gains from Napoleon’s European expansion, meaning France could hardly be considered an imperial power. After 1823, however, it actively turned its focus to the Levant in order to regain a position of power. This article argues that France displayed extraordinary resilience in world politics. It managed to make major inroads into peripheral regions, such as Greece, and achieved considerable influence in the Mediterranean and an important degree of informal power. The article traces some highly diverse French projects and projections in the Eastern Mediterranean to better integrate French interventions in revolutionary Greece into the deployment of France’s global colonial ambitions.
在18世纪的战争中,法国失去了大部分殖民地。到1821年,复辟也抵消了拿破仑在欧洲扩张的所有收益,这意味着法国几乎不能被视为一个帝国力量。然而,1823年以后,它积极地将重点转向黎凡特,以重新获得权力地位。本文认为,法国在世界政治中表现出了非凡的韧性。它成功地向希腊等周边地区大举进军,并在地中海地区取得了相当大的影响力和相当程度的非正式权力。本文追溯了法国在东地中海的一些高度多样化的项目和计划,以更好地将法国对希腊革命的干预融入法国全球殖民野心的部署中。
{"title":"French Involvement in the Greek War of Independence","authors":"Anna Karakatsouli","doi":"10.12681/historein.25062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/historein.25062","url":null,"abstract":"During the wars of the eighteenth century France lost most of its colonies. By 1821 the Restoration had also negated all the gains from Napoleon’s European expansion, meaning France could hardly be considered an imperial power. After 1823, however, it actively turned its focus to the Levant in order to regain a position of power. This article argues that France displayed extraordinary resilience in world politics. It managed to make major inroads into peripheral regions, such as Greece, and achieved considerable influence in the Mediterranean and an important degree of informal power. The article traces some highly diverse French projects and projections in the Eastern Mediterranean to better integrate French interventions in revolutionary Greece into the deployment of France’s global colonial ambitions.","PeriodicalId":38128,"journal":{"name":"Historein","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45096976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Collective Memory and Political Mythologies: Eleftherios Venizelos in Greek Postwar Historiography, 1945–1967 集体记忆与政治神话:希腊战后史学中的韦尼泽洛斯,1945-1967
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2021-07-06 DOI: 10.12681/HISTOREIN.18103
C. Triantafyllou
During the first decades after the Second World War, Greek society had to deal with a vast array of issues, including its relationship with the past. In this context, Eleftherios Venizelos, a great statesman of the early twentieth century, was frequently used both as a symbol in contemporary political debates and as a metonymy in various attempts to contextualise the history of the first half of the century. An important part of these attempts was the corpus of public narratives produced about Venizelos and his era, either as historiographical accounts or autobiographical texts. These narratives, published in newspapers and books, were not, for the most part, academic; their authors were usually journalists, retired military officers, or politicians, who formed a political-historical nexus and who produced a new discourse on a historical period which had hitherto received little or no historiographical attention. In fact, this discourse left its mark on Greek political and historical culture for decades to come.
在第二次世界大战后的头几十年里,希腊社会不得不处理一系列问题,包括与过去的关系。在这种背景下,二十世纪初的伟大政治家Eleftherios Venizelos在当代政治辩论中经常被用作象征,在将本世纪上半叶的历史置于背景中的各种尝试中也经常被用作转喻。这些尝试的一个重要部分是关于韦尼泽洛斯及其时代的公共叙事语料库,无论是历史叙述还是自传文本。这些发表在报纸和书籍上的叙述在很大程度上不是学术性的;他们的作者通常是记者、退役军官或政治家,他们形成了政治历史联系,并对迄今为止很少或根本没有受到史学关注的历史时期进行了新的论述。事实上,这种话语在未来几十年的希腊政治和历史文化中留下了印记。
{"title":"Collective Memory and Political Mythologies: Eleftherios Venizelos in Greek Postwar Historiography, 1945–1967","authors":"C. Triantafyllou","doi":"10.12681/HISTOREIN.18103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/HISTOREIN.18103","url":null,"abstract":"During the first decades after the Second World War, Greek society had to deal with a vast array of issues, including its relationship with the past. In this context, Eleftherios Venizelos, a great statesman of the early twentieth century, was frequently used both as a symbol in contemporary political debates and as a metonymy in various attempts to contextualise the history of the first half of the century. An important part of these attempts was the corpus of public narratives produced about Venizelos and his era, either as historiographical accounts or autobiographical texts. These narratives, published in newspapers and books, were not, for the most part, academic; their authors were usually journalists, retired military officers, or politicians, who formed a political-historical nexus and who produced a new discourse on a historical period which had hitherto received little or no historiographical attention. In fact, this discourse left its mark on Greek political and historical culture for decades to come.","PeriodicalId":38128,"journal":{"name":"Historein","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45408984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial Note 编者按语
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2021-07-06 DOI: 10.12681/historein.26816
Effi Gazi
{"title":"Editorial Note","authors":"Effi Gazi","doi":"10.12681/historein.26816","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/historein.26816","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38128,"journal":{"name":"Historein","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47958842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rupture or Continuity? Revisiting the Basic Themes of the Historiography of the 21 April Dictatorship 断裂还是延续?重新审视4月21日独裁统治史学的基本主题
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2021-07-06 DOI: 10.12681/HISTOREIN.23213
Eleni Kouki
What did the 1967–1974 dictatorship represent for Greece? A violent and illegal episode, a mere parenthesis in the course of its parliamentary history, or an event with deep roots in Greek society and politics? These two basic, albeit contradictory views require us to consider how the last dictatorship in Greece was conceived in public and academic discourse as well as how these two discourses interacted. The main argument of this article is that even the most self-evident concepts about the character of the 1967 dictatorship, so trivial that we hardly perceive them as concepts, emerged through complex cultural processes. More specifically, it examines a series of well-known academic texts or texts produced in academic settings, dating from the junta era to the late 1980s. Although the research on the dictatorship has progressed greatly since then, this article seeks to show that in the first two decades after its collapse, there was a rich production of perceptions regarding the dictatorship that continue to shape our understanding of the period, which is why it is essential to reflect on them.
1967-1974年的独裁统治对希腊来说意味着什么?这是一次暴力和非法的事件,是议会历史上的一个插曲,还是一个深深植根于希腊社会和政治的事件?这两种基本的,尽管相互矛盾的观点要求我们考虑希腊最后的独裁政权是如何在公共和学术话语中被构想出来的,以及这两种话语是如何相互作用的。本文的主要论点是,即使是关于1967年独裁政权性质的最不言自明的概念,我们也很难将其视为概念,它们是通过复杂的文化过程产生的。更具体地说,它检查了一系列著名的学术文本或在学术环境中产生的文本,从军政府时代到20世纪80年代末。尽管对独裁统治的研究从那时起已经取得了很大的进展,但本文试图表明,在其崩溃后的头二十年里,关于独裁统治的大量看法继续塑造我们对这一时期的理解,这就是为什么必须反思它们的原因。
{"title":"Rupture or Continuity? Revisiting the Basic Themes of the Historiography of the 21 April Dictatorship","authors":"Eleni Kouki","doi":"10.12681/HISTOREIN.23213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/HISTOREIN.23213","url":null,"abstract":"What did the 1967–1974 dictatorship represent for Greece? A violent and illegal episode, a mere parenthesis in the course of its parliamentary history, or an event with deep roots in Greek society and politics? These two basic, albeit contradictory views require us to consider how the last dictatorship in Greece was conceived in public and academic discourse as well as how these two discourses interacted. The main argument of this article is that even the most self-evident concepts about the character of the 1967 dictatorship, so trivial that we hardly perceive them as concepts, emerged through complex cultural processes. More specifically, it examines a series of well-known academic texts or texts produced in academic settings, dating from the junta era to the late 1980s. Although the research on the dictatorship has progressed greatly since then, this article seeks to show that in the first two decades after its collapse, there was a rich production of perceptions regarding the dictatorship that continue to shape our understanding of the period, which is why it is essential to reflect on them.","PeriodicalId":38128,"journal":{"name":"Historein","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44650012","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Xavier Bougarel, Hannes Grandits and Marija Vulesica, eds., Local Dimensions of the Second World War in Southeastern Europe Xavier Bougarel,Hannes Grandits和Marija Vulesica主编,《第二次世界大战在东南欧的局部维度》
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2021-07-06 DOI: 10.12681/historein.22624
Vangelis Tzoukas
Review of Xavier Bougarel, Hannes Grandits and Marija Vulesica, eds. Local Dimensions of the Second World War in Southeastern Europe. Oxford: Routledge, 2019. 281 pp.
评述Xavier Bougarel, Hannes Grandits和Marija Vulesica主编。第二次世界大战在东南欧的局部维度。牛津:劳特利奇出版社,2019。281页。
{"title":"Xavier Bougarel, Hannes Grandits and Marija Vulesica, eds., Local Dimensions of the Second World War in Southeastern Europe","authors":"Vangelis Tzoukas","doi":"10.12681/historein.22624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/historein.22624","url":null,"abstract":"Review of Xavier Bougarel, Hannes Grandits and Marija Vulesica, eds. Local Dimensions of the Second World War in Southeastern Europe. Oxford: Routledge, 2019. 281 pp.","PeriodicalId":38128,"journal":{"name":"Historein","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47702727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leda Papastefanaki, Η φλέβα της γης: Τα μεταλλεία της Ελλάδας, 19ος–20ός αιώνας [The vein of the earth: The mines of Greece, 19th–20th centuries]
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2021-07-06 DOI: 10.12681/HISTOREIN.21733
Christos Karampatsos
Review of Leda Papastefanaki. Η φλέβα της γης: Τα μεταλλεία της Ελλάδας, 19ος–20ός αιώνας [The vein of the earth: The mines of Greece, 19th–20th centuries]. Athens: Vivliorama, 2017. 392 pp.
Leda Papastefanaki评论。大地的脉络:希腊的矿山,19至20世纪。雅典:Vivliorama,2017。392页。
{"title":"Leda Papastefanaki, Η φλέβα της γης: Τα μεταλλεία της Ελλάδας, 19ος–20ός αιώνας [The vein of the earth: The mines of Greece, 19th–20th centuries]","authors":"Christos Karampatsos","doi":"10.12681/HISTOREIN.21733","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/HISTOREIN.21733","url":null,"abstract":"Review of Leda Papastefanaki. Η φλέβα της γης: Τα μεταλλεία της Ελλάδας, 19ος–20ός αιώνας [The vein of the earth: The mines of Greece, 19th–20th centuries]. Athens: Vivliorama, 2017. 392 pp.","PeriodicalId":38128,"journal":{"name":"Historein","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42368473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From the Greek Revolution of 1821 to the Metapolitefsi: Historiographical Debates in Greece across Two Centuries 从1821年希腊革命到元政治:两个世纪以来希腊的史学争论
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2021-07-06 DOI: 10.12681/HISTOREIN.25634
Vangelis Karamanolakis, C. Triantafyllou
Nowadays, with the celebration of the Greek state’s bicentennial, the exploration of how the national past was debated, historicised and narrated through historiographical and political means holds an interesting position: by examining how certain pasts entered the national canon, how events and figures were pantheonised, and how history and memory wars were conducted, we may be able to assess why and how nation-states commemorate themselves and formulate narratives about the shared past. Using the past as a symbolic resource, the agents of political and social power seek to provide the definitive version of how and why did we arrive at the present. Simultaneously, these official versions of the past are constantly contested by opposing social forces, which frequently manage to have their versions merge with, incorporated into or stand alongside those of their opponents. It is through these procedures, namely historiographical debates such as these explored in this issue of Historein, that the past turns into history.
如今,随着希腊建国二百周年的庆祝,探索国家过去是如何通过史学和政治手段进行辩论、历史化和叙述的,占据了一个有趣的位置:通过研究某些过去是如何进入国家正典的,事件和人物是如何被泛神论的,以及历史和记忆战争是如何进行的,我们也许能够评估民族国家为什么以及如何纪念自己,并制定关于共同过去的叙事。政治和社会权力的代理人利用过去作为象征性资源,试图提供我们是如何以及为什么来到现在的最终版本。与此同时,这些官方版本的过去不断受到对立社会力量的质疑,他们经常设法将自己的版本与对手的版本合并、合并或站在一起。正是通过这些程序,即历史辩论,如本期《历史》所探讨的,过去才成为历史。
{"title":"From the Greek Revolution of 1821 to the Metapolitefsi: Historiographical Debates in Greece across Two Centuries","authors":"Vangelis Karamanolakis, C. Triantafyllou","doi":"10.12681/HISTOREIN.25634","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/HISTOREIN.25634","url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, with the celebration of the Greek state’s bicentennial, the exploration of how the national past was debated, historicised and narrated through historiographical and political means holds an interesting position: by examining how certain pasts entered the national canon, how events and figures were pantheonised, and how history and memory wars were conducted, we may be able to assess why and how nation-states commemorate themselves and formulate narratives about the shared past. Using the past as a symbolic resource, the agents of political and social power seek to provide the definitive version of how and why did we arrive at the present. Simultaneously, these official versions of the past are constantly contested by opposing social forces, which frequently manage to have their versions merge with, incorporated into or stand alongside those of their opponents. It is through these procedures, namely historiographical debates such as these explored in this issue of Historein, that the past turns into history.","PeriodicalId":38128,"journal":{"name":"Historein","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49446733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Mathieu Grenet, La fabrique communautaire: Les Grecs à Venise, Livourne et Marseille, 1770–1840 Mathieu Grenet,《社区工厂:威尼斯、利沃诺和马赛的希腊人》,1770-1840年
Q3 Arts and Humanities Pub Date : 2021-07-06 DOI: 10.12681/historein.21025
Konstantina Zanou
Review of Mathieu Grenet. La fabrique communautaire: Les Grecs à Venise, Livourne et Marseille, 1770–1840. Athens: École française d’Athènes; Rome: École française de Rome and, 2016. 456 pp.
Mathieu Grenet的评论。社区工厂:威尼斯、利沃诺和马赛的希腊人,1770-1840年。雅典:雅典法语学校;罗马:罗马法语学校,2016年。456页。
{"title":"Mathieu Grenet, La fabrique communautaire: Les Grecs à Venise, Livourne et Marseille, 1770–1840","authors":"Konstantina Zanou","doi":"10.12681/historein.21025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12681/historein.21025","url":null,"abstract":"Review of Mathieu Grenet. La fabrique communautaire: Les Grecs à Venise, Livourne et Marseille, 1770–1840. Athens: École française d’Athènes; Rome: École française de Rome and, 2016. 456 pp.","PeriodicalId":38128,"journal":{"name":"Historein","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47318810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Historein
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1