Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in adults, with lifetime rates of 21% to 33%. There are numerous risk factors, including older age, hypertension, coronary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, diabetes, and others. Patients engaging in lifelong high-endurance exercise also have increased risk. Some organizations recommend screening; others do not. However, many patients identify AF themselves using mobile cardiac monitoring devices, some of which accurately detect the arrhythmia. Patients with AF with hemodynamic instability are treated with immediate synchronized cardioversion. Treatment options for stable patients include scheduled cardioversion, rhythm control with pharmacotherapy, catheter ablation, and rate control with pharmacotherapy. Catheter ablation is increasingly used as first-line therapy, with up to 80% of patients remaining AF-free after one or two ablation treatments, an outcome superior to that with pharmacotherapy. Patients with AF should receive anticoagulation based on the CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age 75 years or older [doubled], Diabetes, prior Stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism [doubled], Vascular disease, Age 65 to 74 years, Sex category) score, and also before and immediately after ablation or cardioversion. It is uncertain whether long-term anticoagulation is needed after successful ablation. Atrial flutter (AFL) is the second most common sustained supraventricular arrhythmia. Patients with AFL are at risk of developing AF, and many recommendations for managing AFL are similar to those for AF. The preferred management for AFL is catheter ablation, with success rates exceeding 90%.
{"title":"Cardiovascular Disease: Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter.","authors":"Robert L Gauer, Joel M Guess","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in adults, with lifetime rates of 21% to 33%. There are numerous risk factors, including older age, hypertension, coronary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, diabetes, and others. Patients engaging in lifelong high-endurance exercise also have increased risk. Some organizations recommend screening; others do not. However, many patients identify AF themselves using mobile cardiac monitoring devices, some of which accurately detect the arrhythmia. Patients with AF with hemodynamic instability are treated with immediate synchronized cardioversion. Treatment options for stable patients include scheduled cardioversion, rhythm control with pharmacotherapy, catheter ablation, and rate control with pharmacotherapy. Catheter ablation is increasingly used as first-line therapy, with up to 80% of patients remaining AF-free after one or two ablation treatments, an outcome superior to that with pharmacotherapy. Patients with AF should receive anticoagulation based on the CHA<sup>2</sup>DS<sup>2</sup>-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age 75 years or older [doubled], Diabetes, prior Stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism [doubled], Vascular disease, Age 65 to 74 years, Sex category) score, and also before and immediately after ablation or cardioversion. It is uncertain whether long-term anticoagulation is needed after successful ablation. Atrial flutter (AFL) is the second most common sustained supraventricular arrhythmia. Patients with AFL are at risk of developing AF, and many recommendations for managing AFL are similar to those for AF. The preferred management for AFL is catheter ablation, with success rates exceeding 90%.</p>","PeriodicalId":38325,"journal":{"name":"FP essentials","volume":"536 ","pages":"7-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139471457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Premature atrial contractions (PACs) occur in nearly all individuals. Although typically asymptomatic, they can cause palpitations. PACs previously were considered benign, but there is increasing recognition that frequent PACs are associated with developing atrial fibrillation. After potentially reversible causes (eg, electrolyte abnormalities, hyperthyroidism) are eliminated, symptomatic PACs can be treated with beta blockers; some patients are candidates for ablation. Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) also are common, occurring in more than two-thirds of the population. They typically are asymptomatic, but some patients experience palpitations and dizziness. Persistent PVCs are associated with underlying heart disease; an echocardiogram can help detect this disease. Reversible causes (eg, electrolyte abnormalities, hyperthyroidism, stimulant drug use) should be excluded. Patients with PVCs and left ventricular dysfunction are candidates for ablation. Others may be treated with beta blockers, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, or antiarrhythmics. Supraventricular tachycardia also is common. Hemodynamically unstable patients are treated with cardioversion. Stable symptomatic patients can be considered for catheter ablation or medical antiarrhythmics. Finally, sinus node dysfunction, previously called sick sinus syndrome, causes a variety of rhythm disturbances, including bradycardia, sinus arrest, bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome, and others. Unstable patients are treated with atropine to increase heart rate. Stable patients should discontinue bradycardia-causing drugs, if possible. Some may require a pacemaker.
{"title":"Cardiovascular Disease: Other Common Arrhythmias.","authors":"Joel M Guess, Robert L Gauer","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Premature atrial contractions (PACs) occur in nearly all individuals. Although typically asymptomatic, they can cause palpitations. PACs previously were considered benign, but there is increasing recognition that frequent PACs are associated with developing atrial fibrillation. After potentially reversible causes (eg, electrolyte abnormalities, hyperthyroidism) are eliminated, symptomatic PACs can be treated with beta blockers; some patients are candidates for ablation. Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) also are common, occurring in more than two-thirds of the population. They typically are asymptomatic, but some patients experience palpitations and dizziness. Persistent PVCs are associated with underlying heart disease; an echocardiogram can help detect this disease. Reversible causes (eg, electrolyte abnormalities, hyperthyroidism, stimulant drug use) should be excluded. Patients with PVCs and left ventricular dysfunction are candidates for ablation. Others may be treated with beta blockers, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, or antiarrhythmics. Supraventricular tachycardia also is common. Hemodynamically unstable patients are treated with cardioversion. Stable symptomatic patients can be considered for catheter ablation or medical antiarrhythmics. Finally, sinus node dysfunction, previously called sick sinus syndrome, causes a variety of rhythm disturbances, including bradycardia, sinus arrest, bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome, and others. Unstable patients are treated with atropine to increase heart rate. Stable patients should discontinue bradycardia-causing drugs, if possible. Some may require a pacemaker.</p>","PeriodicalId":38325,"journal":{"name":"FP essentials","volume":"536 ","pages":"22-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139471841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acute pericarditis, the most common inflammatory heart condition, typically is caused by viral infections. Patients have sharp chest pain that improves when leaning forward. Electrocardiogram typically shows widespread ST-segment elevation; echocardiogram may show pericardial effusion; and levels of inflammatory markers may be elevated. Colchicine plus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are first-line treatment. Patients with fever, elevated inflammatory marker levels, or pericardial effusion should be hospitalized. Myocarditis also commonly is caused by viruses, although some cases are due to autoimmune or other conditions. Symptoms include chest pain, dyspnea, and fever. Although endomyocardial biopsy is the definitive diagnostic test, most cases are diagnosed based on clinical symptoms, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and cardiac markers, plus excluding other conditions. Patients with heart failure should receive guideline-recommended therapy, plus treatment of underlying conditions (eg, autoimmune conditions). Infective endocarditis is caused by infection of cardiac valves, chambers, or intracardiac devices. There are many causative organisms, but Staphylococcus aureus is most common. Fever is the most frequent symptom, although some patients have systemic emboli or heart failure. The modified Duke criteria can aid in diagnosis, which is confirmed by positive blood cultures. Antibiotics are started immediately after obtaining blood cultures, modified based on culture results, and continued for 4 to 6 weeks after first negative culture.
急性心包炎是最常见的心脏炎症,通常由病毒感染引起。患者胸痛剧烈,身体前倾时疼痛减轻。心电图通常显示广泛的 ST 段抬高;超声心动图可能显示心包积液;炎症标志物水平可能升高。秋水仙碱加非甾体抗炎药是一线治疗方法。发热、炎症标志物水平升高或心包积液的患者应住院治疗。心肌炎通常也是由病毒引起的,但有些病例是由自身免疫或其他疾病引起的。症状包括胸痛、呼吸困难和发热。虽然心内膜活检是明确的诊断检查,但大多数病例的诊断是基于临床症状、心电图、超声心动图和心脏标志物,并排除其他疾病。心力衰竭患者应接受指南推荐的治疗,以及基础疾病(如自身免疫性疾病)的治疗。感染性心内膜炎是由心脏瓣膜、心腔或心内装置感染引起的。致病菌有很多,但最常见的是金黄色葡萄球菌。发热是最常见的症状,但有些患者会出现全身性栓塞或心力衰竭。修改后的杜克标准可帮助诊断,血液培养阳性可确诊。在获得血液培养后立即开始使用抗生素,并根据培养结果进行调整,在首次培养阴性后继续使用 4 到 6 周。
{"title":"Cardiovascular Disease: Inflammatory and Infectious Heart Conditions.","authors":"Robert L Gauer, Joel M Guess","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute pericarditis, the most common inflammatory heart condition, typically is caused by viral infections. Patients have sharp chest pain that improves when leaning forward. Electrocardiogram typically shows widespread ST-segment elevation; echocardiogram may show pericardial effusion; and levels of inflammatory markers may be elevated. Colchicine plus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are first-line treatment. Patients with fever, elevated inflammatory marker levels, or pericardial effusion should be hospitalized. Myocarditis also commonly is caused by viruses, although some cases are due to autoimmune or other conditions. Symptoms include chest pain, dyspnea, and fever. Although endomyocardial biopsy is the definitive diagnostic test, most cases are diagnosed based on clinical symptoms, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and cardiac markers, plus excluding other conditions. Patients with heart failure should receive guideline-recommended therapy, plus treatment of underlying conditions (eg, autoimmune conditions). Infective endocarditis is caused by infection of cardiac valves, chambers, or intracardiac devices. There are many causative organisms, but Staphylococcus aureus is most common. Fever is the most frequent symptom, although some patients have systemic emboli or heart failure. The modified Duke criteria can aid in diagnosis, which is confirmed by positive blood cultures. Antibiotics are started immediately after obtaining blood cultures, modified based on culture results, and continued for 4 to 6 weeks after first negative culture.</p>","PeriodicalId":38325,"journal":{"name":"FP essentials","volume":"536 ","pages":"29-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139471489","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) should receive anticoagulation with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) if the CHA2DS2-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age 75 years or older [doubled], Diabetes, prior Stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism [doubled], Vascular disease, Age 65 to 74 years, Sex category) score is at least 2 in men or 3 in women. Antiplatelet therapy is not recommended. DOACs typically are the first-line therapy. Anticoagulation requires special consideration in some patient groups (eg, patients with bleeding problems should be considered for left atrial appendage occlusion devices, rather than anticoagulation). Atrial high-rate episodes detected on electronic devices confer higher AF risk; however, there currently are no clearly defined thresholds to determine who benefits from anticoagulation. Patients with AF with valvular heart disease should receive anticoagulation based on CHA2DS2-VASc score; those with mechanical heart valves or moderate to severe stenosis of a native mitral valve should receive warfarin, not DOACs. Chronic kidney disease requires dose reduction. Patients with AF taking antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention require special consideration because of the bleeding risk. The risk-benefit profile favors anticoagulation in older adults. Patients undergoing surgical procedures with high bleeding risk often need temporary anticoagulant discontinuation. Patients receiving anticoagulation who develop life-threatening bleeding should receive reversal therapy.
{"title":"Cardiovascular Disease: Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"William Criswell, Robert L Gauer","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) should receive anticoagulation with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) if the CHA<sup>2</sup>DS<sup>2</sup>-VASc (Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age 75 years or older [doubled], Diabetes, prior Stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism [doubled], Vascular disease, Age 65 to 74 years, Sex category) score is at least 2 in men or 3 in women. Antiplatelet therapy is not recommended. DOACs typically are the first-line therapy. Anticoagulation requires special consideration in some patient groups (eg, patients with bleeding problems should be considered for left atrial appendage occlusion devices, rather than anticoagulation). Atrial high-rate episodes detected on electronic devices confer higher AF risk; however, there currently are no clearly defined thresholds to determine who benefits from anticoagulation. Patients with AF with valvular heart disease should receive anticoagulation based on CHA<sup>2</sup>DS<sup>2</sup>-VASc score; those with mechanical heart valves or moderate to severe stenosis of a native mitral valve should receive warfarin, not DOACs. Chronic kidney disease requires dose reduction. Patients with AF taking antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention require special consideration because of the bleeding risk. The risk-benefit profile favors anticoagulation in older adults. Patients undergoing surgical procedures with high bleeding risk often need temporary anticoagulant discontinuation. Patients receiving anticoagulation who develop life-threatening bleeding should receive reversal therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":38325,"journal":{"name":"FP essentials","volume":"536 ","pages":"14-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139471374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Stephen Line, Elizabeth T Nguyen, Laura Marsh, Calli Fry
The ankle is the cause of many musculoskeletal injuries. Knowledge of ankle anatomy and physiology can provide an initial framework to help clinicians formulate a differential diagnosis. A thorough history should be obtained, with a focus on mechanism of injury and symptom duration to hone the differential diagnosis and physical examination. Specific diagnostic maneuvers allow for evaluation of individual structures and assessment of ankle stability. The Ottawa Ankle Rules can assess the need for x-rays and help rule out underlying fracture. Lateral and medial ankle sprains and Achilles tendinopathy are among the most common ankle conditions in the primary care setting. These sprains are managed with ankle protection with a splint, brace, or other device; the rest, ice, compression, and elevation (RICE) protocol; and a short course of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Management of Achilles tendon conditions typically consists of the RICE protocol, activity reduction, physical therapy or clinician-directed exercises, NSAIDs, and, in severe cases, short-term immobilization. For patients with stable ankle fractures, various orthoses can be used for immobilization. Orthopedic consultation should be sought for patients with unstable ankle fractures.
踝关节是造成许多肌肉骨骼损伤的原因。踝关节解剖学和生理学知识可以提供一个初步框架,帮助临床医生制定鉴别诊断。应全面了解病史,重点关注受伤机制和症状持续时间,以完善鉴别诊断和体格检查。通过特定的诊断方法可以对个别结构进行评估,并对踝关节的稳定性进行评估。渥太华踝关节规则》可以评估是否需要进行 X 光检查,并帮助排除潜在的骨折。踝关节外侧和内侧扭伤以及跟腱病是初级保健中最常见的踝关节疾病。在处理这些扭伤时,可使用夹板、支架或其他装置保护踝关节;采用休息、冰敷、加压和抬高(RICE)方案;以及短期服用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)。跟腱疾病的治疗通常包括 RICE 方案、减少活动、理疗或临床医生指导的锻炼、非甾体抗炎药,严重者还需要短期固定。对于踝关节骨折稳定的患者,可以使用各种矫形器进行固定。对于踝关节骨折不稳定的患者,应寻求骨科咨询。
{"title":"Problems With Medium-Sized Joints: Ankle Conditions.","authors":"Stephen Line, Elizabeth T Nguyen, Laura Marsh, Calli Fry","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ankle is the cause of many musculoskeletal injuries. Knowledge of ankle anatomy and physiology can provide an initial framework to help clinicians formulate a differential diagnosis. A thorough history should be obtained, with a focus on mechanism of injury and symptom duration to hone the differential diagnosis and physical examination. Specific diagnostic maneuvers allow for evaluation of individual structures and assessment of ankle stability. The Ottawa Ankle Rules can assess the need for x-rays and help rule out underlying fracture. Lateral and medial ankle sprains and Achilles tendinopathy are among the most common ankle conditions in the primary care setting. These sprains are managed with ankle protection with a splint, brace, or other device; the rest, ice, compression, and elevation (RICE) protocol; and a short course of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Management of Achilles tendon conditions typically consists of the RICE protocol, activity reduction, physical therapy or clinician-directed exercises, NSAIDs, and, in severe cases, short-term immobilization. For patients with stable ankle fractures, various orthoses can be used for immobilization. Orthopedic consultation should be sought for patients with unstable ankle fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":38325,"journal":{"name":"FP essentials","volume":"535 ","pages":"25-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138795633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Calli Fry, Elizabeth T Nguyen, Stephen Line, Laura Marsh
For patients with elbow pain, a comprehensive history and physical examination can identify the mechanism of injury and specific tests can help determine the underlying pathology. When imaging is indicated, x-ray typically is the initial modality. Indications for ultrasonography include the need for static, dynamic, and stress visualization of elbow cartilage, tendons, ligaments, and osseous structures. Magnetic resonance imaging study is preferred for assessment of chronic elbow pain because of its ability to detect bone marrow edema, tendinopathy, nerve entrapment, and joint effusion. In children, common elbow conditions and injuries include supracondylar fracture, posterior elbow dislocation, medial epicondyle apophysitis (Little Leaguers elbow), ulnar collateral ligament injury, and chronic lateral elbow pain. Primary and secondary bony ossification centers and the presence of growth plates affect management of these conditions in children. In adults, common conditions and injuries are radial head fractures, lateral epicondylitis, medial epicondylitis, and ulnar nerve compression. Radial head fractures are categorized according to the Modified Mason Classification. Patients with type III and IV fractures should be referred for surgical management. Lateral and medial epicondylitis are overuse injuries diagnosed based on signs and symptoms. Surgical management should be considered for patients who do not improve with conservative management.
对于肘部疼痛的患者,全面的病史和体格检查可以确定损伤机制,特定的检查有助于确定潜在的病理。当需要进行影像学检查时,X 光通常是首选方式。超声波检查的适应症包括需要对肘关节软骨、肌腱、韧带和骨性结构进行静态、动态和应力显像。磁共振成像能检测骨髓水肿、肌腱病变、神经卡压和关节积液,因此是评估慢性肘部疼痛的首选。儿童常见的肘部疾病和损伤包括肱骨髁上骨折、肘关节后脱位、内上髁骨骺炎(小球员肘)、尺侧副韧带损伤和慢性肘外侧疼痛。原发性和继发性骨化中心以及生长板的存在都会影响儿童对这些疾病的治疗。成人常见的疾病和损伤有桡骨头骨折、外侧上髁炎、内侧上髁炎和尺神经压迫。桡骨头骨折根据 "改良梅森分类法 "进行分类。III 型和 IV 型骨折患者应转诊接受手术治疗。外侧和内侧上髁炎是根据体征和症状诊断的过度劳损。保守治疗无效的患者应考虑手术治疗。
{"title":"Problems With Medium-Sized Joints: Elbow Conditions.","authors":"Calli Fry, Elizabeth T Nguyen, Stephen Line, Laura Marsh","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For patients with elbow pain, a comprehensive history and physical examination can identify the mechanism of injury and specific tests can help determine the underlying pathology. When imaging is indicated, x-ray typically is the initial modality. Indications for ultrasonography include the need for static, dynamic, and stress visualization of elbow cartilage, tendons, ligaments, and osseous structures. Magnetic resonance imaging study is preferred for assessment of chronic elbow pain because of its ability to detect bone marrow edema, tendinopathy, nerve entrapment, and joint effusion. In children, common elbow conditions and injuries include supracondylar fracture, posterior elbow dislocation, medial epicondyle apophysitis (Little Leaguers elbow), ulnar collateral ligament injury, and chronic lateral elbow pain. Primary and secondary bony ossification centers and the presence of growth plates affect management of these conditions in children. In adults, common conditions and injuries are radial head fractures, lateral epicondylitis, medial epicondylitis, and ulnar nerve compression. Radial head fractures are categorized according to the Modified Mason Classification. Patients with type III and IV fractures should be referred for surgical management. Lateral and medial epicondylitis are overuse injuries diagnosed based on signs and symptoms. Surgical management should be considered for patients who do not improve with conservative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":38325,"journal":{"name":"FP essentials","volume":"535 ","pages":"13-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138796097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laura Marsh, Elizabeth T Nguyen, Calli Fry, Stephen Line
The incidence of neck pain in US primary care settings ranges from 10% to 21% per year. A key component in evaluation of patients with neck pain is identification of red flag signs or symptoms that indicate the need for urgent evaluation for possible serious conditions. These include fever, unexplained weight loss, trauma, vision changes, new or severe headache, and altered mental status, among others. Patients with acute onset or worsening chronic neck pain without trauma or red flag signs or symptoms should be assessed initially with x-ray. Magnetic resonance imaging study is recommended for patients with progressive neurologic symptoms, neurologic compromise, suspected infection, or other red flag signs or symptoms. Common conditions and injuries associated with neck pain in the primary care setting include cervical strains and sprains, cervical spondylosis, cervical discogenic pain, cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy, whiplash, cervical fracture, and postural pain. Most patients with neck pain without red flag signs or symptoms recover with conservative management, however, there is little evidence to support these treatments. Pharmacotherapy includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and muscle relaxants. Small benefits have been shown for combination exercise programs, mind-body programs, and acupuncture. Referral for surgical management is indicated for patients with progressive neurologic deficits.
在美国的初级医疗机构中,每年颈部疼痛的发病率在 10% 到 21% 之间。对颈部疼痛患者进行评估的一个关键要素是识别提示需要对可能的严重疾病进行紧急评估的标志性体征或症状。这些症状包括发热、不明原因的体重减轻、外伤、视力改变、新的或严重的头痛以及精神状态改变等。急性发作或慢性颈部疼痛加重的患者,如果没有外伤或红色标志体征或症状,应首先进行 X 光检查。如果患者出现进行性神经系统症状、神经系统受损、疑似感染或其他明显体征或症状,则建议进行磁共振成像检查。在基层医疗机构中,与颈部疼痛相关的常见疾病和损伤包括颈部拉伤和扭伤、颈椎病、颈椎间盘源性疼痛、颈椎病和脊髓病、鞭打、颈椎骨折和姿势性疼痛。大多数无明显症状或体征的颈部疼痛患者可通过保守治疗痊愈,但支持这些治疗方法的证据很少。药物疗法包括非甾体抗炎药、对乙酰氨基酚和肌肉松弛剂。综合运动疗法、身心疗法和针灸疗法的疗效甚微。对于有进行性神经功能缺损的患者,应转诊接受手术治疗。
{"title":"Problems With Medium-Sized Joints: Neck Conditions.","authors":"Laura Marsh, Elizabeth T Nguyen, Calli Fry, Stephen Line","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The incidence of neck pain in US primary care settings ranges from 10% to 21% per year. A key component in evaluation of patients with neck pain is identification of red flag signs or symptoms that indicate the need for urgent evaluation for possible serious conditions. These include fever, unexplained weight loss, trauma, vision changes, new or severe headache, and altered mental status, among others. Patients with acute onset or worsening chronic neck pain without trauma or red flag signs or symptoms should be assessed initially with x-ray. Magnetic resonance imaging study is recommended for patients with progressive neurologic symptoms, neurologic compromise, suspected infection, or other red flag signs or symptoms. Common conditions and injuries associated with neck pain in the primary care setting include cervical strains and sprains, cervical spondylosis, cervical discogenic pain, cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy, whiplash, cervical fracture, and postural pain. Most patients with neck pain without red flag signs or symptoms recover with conservative management, however, there is little evidence to support these treatments. Pharmacotherapy includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and muscle relaxants. Small benefits have been shown for combination exercise programs, mind-body programs, and acupuncture. Referral for surgical management is indicated for patients with progressive neurologic deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":38325,"journal":{"name":"FP essentials","volume":"535 ","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138796015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elizabeth T Nguyen, Laura Marsh, Stephen Line, Calli Fry
Common wrist conditions include fractures and other injuries, osteoarthritis, radial epiphysitis, joint instability, de Quervain tenosynovitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, ganglion cyst, and ulnar neuropathy. The initial history and physical examination, with particular focus on the anatomic structures of the wrist, can narrow the differential diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging study can be used to identify soft tissue masses and occult osseous processes, particularly with scaphoid fractures. Computed tomography scan is useful in cases of bony abnormalities, high clinical suspicion of occult fracture, and surgical planning. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography can help identify soft tissue injuries, synovitis, or edema. It also can assess for nerve pathology, such as increased median nerve surface area in carpal tunnel syndrome. Management of common wrist fractures, such as distal radius, carpal, and scaphoid fractures, includes nonsurgical and surgical options, immobilization, and referral for further management or surgical consultation. Other wrist conditions, including overuse conditions such as carpometacarpal osteoarthritis or radial epiphysitis, can be managed conservatively initially. Ganglion cysts can be managed with immobility and rest initially, or aspiration or surgical excision. Ulnar neuropathy is the result of local compression of the ulnar nerve at the level of the carpal bones. It typically is managed with activity modification and splinting.
{"title":"Problems With Medium-Sized Joints: Wrist Conditions.","authors":"Elizabeth T Nguyen, Laura Marsh, Stephen Line, Calli Fry","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Common wrist conditions include fractures and other injuries, osteoarthritis, radial epiphysitis, joint instability, de Quervain tenosynovitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, ganglion cyst, and ulnar neuropathy. The initial history and physical examination, with particular focus on the anatomic structures of the wrist, can narrow the differential diagnosis. Magnetic resonance imaging study can be used to identify soft tissue masses and occult osseous processes, particularly with scaphoid fractures. Computed tomography scan is useful in cases of bony abnormalities, high clinical suspicion of occult fracture, and surgical planning. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography can help identify soft tissue injuries, synovitis, or edema. It also can assess for nerve pathology, such as increased median nerve surface area in carpal tunnel syndrome. Management of common wrist fractures, such as distal radius, carpal, and scaphoid fractures, includes nonsurgical and surgical options, immobilization, and referral for further management or surgical consultation. Other wrist conditions, including overuse conditions such as carpometacarpal osteoarthritis or radial epiphysitis, can be managed conservatively initially. Ganglion cysts can be managed with immobility and rest initially, or aspiration or surgical excision. Ulnar neuropathy is the result of local compression of the ulnar nerve at the level of the carpal bones. It typically is managed with activity modification and splinting.</p>","PeriodicalId":38325,"journal":{"name":"FP essentials","volume":"535 ","pages":"7-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138796018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}