Pub Date : 2025-06-13DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100751
Burcu Ünlütabak , Duygun Erol Barkana
As programmable virtual agents/robots are becoming increasingly common, it is essential to examine children's interactions with these technological tools. In this study, we examined how 35 5 to 9-year-old children interact with a social robot (NAO) during a Question Elicitation Task. Following receiving informed consent and demographics information from parents, we tested children individually in their schools. We invited children to ask questions to the robot about animals and objects. The robot provided scripted responses to children's questions across informative and noninformative answer conditions, presented in a fixed order. Children first received informative answers, and then non-informative answers. We simulated smooth conversations with the robot using a Wizard of Oz teleoperation interface using a Python GUI. This interface allowed us to respond to children's questions via a scripted response database generated by GPT-4 that we reviewed and edited for accuracy. If children asked questions beyond the database, this interface also allowed us to regenerate responses from GPT-4 online. Findings showed that children perceived robots as a friendly technological device rather than a living entity and asked the robot information-seeking questions about animals and objects. About 25–30 % of children's information-seeking questions were explanation-seeking. They asked fewer questions when they received non-informative answers than informative answers but this effect disappeared when frequency of questions were adjusted for the length of talk. Children mostly asked about label, function/behavior and physical properties of the items. We discuss these findings within the context of children's learning from social robots.
随着可编程虚拟代理/机器人变得越来越普遍,检查儿童与这些技术工具的互动是必不可少的。在这项研究中,我们研究了35名5至9岁的儿童在问题引出任务中如何与社交机器人(NAO)互动。在获得家长的知情同意和人口统计信息后,我们在他们的学校对儿童进行了单独测试。我们邀请孩子们向机器人提问关于动物和物体的问题。机器人对孩子们的问题按照固定的顺序,在有信息和没有信息的情况下提供脚本式的回答。孩子们首先得到了信息性的答案,然后是非信息性的答案。我们使用一个Python GUI的Wizard of Oz远程操作界面来模拟与机器人的流畅对话。这个界面允许我们通过GPT-4生成的脚本回答数据库来回答孩子们的问题,我们对这些数据库进行了审查和编辑,以确保准确性。如果孩子们问的问题超出了数据库,这个界面还允许我们重新生成GPT-4的在线回答。研究结果表明,儿童将机器人视为一种友好的技术设备,而不是一个活生生的实体,并向机器人询问有关动物和物体的信息。约25 - 30%的儿童信息寻求问题为解释寻求问题。当他们得到非信息性答案时,他们问的问题比得到信息性答案时少,但当问题的频率根据谈话的长度进行调整时,这种影响就消失了。孩子们主要询问物品的标签、功能/行为和物理性质。我们在儿童向社交机器人学习的背景下讨论这些发现。
{"title":"Children's information search with social robots: A focus on Children's question-asking behavior","authors":"Burcu Ünlütabak , Duygun Erol Barkana","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100751","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100751","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As programmable virtual agents/robots are becoming increasingly common, it is essential to examine children's interactions with these technological tools. In this study, we examined how 35 5 to 9-year-old children interact with a social robot (NAO) during a Question Elicitation Task. Following receiving informed consent and demographics information from parents, we tested children individually in their schools. We invited children to ask questions to the robot about animals and objects. The robot provided scripted responses to children's questions across informative and noninformative answer conditions, presented in a fixed order. Children first received informative answers, and then non-informative answers. We simulated smooth conversations with the robot using a Wizard of Oz teleoperation interface using a Python GUI. This interface allowed us to respond to children's questions via a scripted response database generated by GPT-4 that we reviewed and edited for accuracy. If children asked questions beyond the database, this interface also allowed us to regenerate responses from GPT-4 online. Findings showed that children perceived robots as a friendly technological device rather than a living entity and asked the robot information-seeking questions about animals and objects. About 25–30 % of children's information-seeking questions were explanation-seeking. They asked fewer questions when they received non-informative answers than informative answers but this effect disappeared when frequency of questions were adjusted for the length of talk. Children mostly asked about label, function/behavior and physical properties of the items. We discuss these findings within the context of children's learning from social robots.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100751"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144298999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-05DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100738
Abhishek Kulkarni , David Magda , Rebecca Ward , Yerika Jimenez , Monica Hernandez , Ting Liu , Christina Gardner-McCune , Francis Quek , Rebecca Schlegel , Sharon Lynn Chu
Making has historically encompassed electronics and digital fabrication technologies. Increasingly, Making projects have started incorporating computational aspects. For example, a microprocessor board is attached to electronics and 3D-printed components so that they can be programmed to perform certain functions. Adding computation to Making enables a creation to become more dynamic and interactive. However, incorporating computation into Making also increases the difficulty of integrating Making into formal educational settings not only because students need to handle an additional set of skills and concepts, but also in terms of the additional overhead in preparation. This work deployed computationally-based Making activities in authentic 5th and 6th grade (ages 10 to 12) science classrooms with 442 students in a public school in the United States for one year. Our research adopts the Design-Based Research (DBR) methodology, and this paper presents insights from our retrospective process of reflection, especially in terms of the challenges of integrating computation-based Making in the school context. Our findings indicate four key challenges to incorporate computation-based Making projects in the formal public school context on a sustained basis; achieving balance between science, Making, and computational thinking, making connections between these distinct concepts apparent, organizational and operational issues, and the delivery of designed lesson plans. Despite these challenges, we believe the potential for a positive impact is large. We make two primary contributions; a comprehensive description of an at-scale computation-based Making project as well as learnings for future Making work in formal educational settings.
{"title":"Deploying computation-based Making projects in authentic public school classrooms at scale: Lessons learned","authors":"Abhishek Kulkarni , David Magda , Rebecca Ward , Yerika Jimenez , Monica Hernandez , Ting Liu , Christina Gardner-McCune , Francis Quek , Rebecca Schlegel , Sharon Lynn Chu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100738","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100738","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Making has historically encompassed electronics and digital fabrication technologies. Increasingly, Making projects have started incorporating computational aspects. For example, a microprocessor board is attached to electronics and 3D-printed components so that they can be programmed to perform certain functions. Adding computation to Making enables a creation to become more dynamic and interactive. However, incorporating computation into Making also increases the difficulty of integrating Making into formal educational settings not only because students need to handle an additional set of skills and concepts, but also in terms of the additional overhead in preparation. This work deployed computationally-based Making activities in authentic 5th and 6th grade (ages 10 to 12) science classrooms with 442 students in a public school in the United States for one year. Our research adopts the Design-Based Research (DBR) methodology, and this paper presents insights from our retrospective process of reflection, especially in terms of the challenges of integrating computation-based Making in the school context. Our findings indicate four key challenges to incorporate computation-based Making projects in the formal public school context on a sustained basis; achieving balance between science, Making, and computational thinking, making connections between these distinct concepts apparent, organizational and operational issues, and the delivery of designed lesson plans. Despite these challenges, we believe the potential for a positive impact is large. We make two primary contributions; a comprehensive description of an at-scale computation-based Making project as well as learnings for future Making work in formal educational settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100738"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144263595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100742
{"title":"Erratum regarding missing Selection and participation statement in previously published article","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100742","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100742","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100742"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144239705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100745
{"title":"Erratum regarding missing Selection and participation statement in previously published article","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100745","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100745","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100745"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144240014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100746
{"title":"Erratum regarding missing Selection and participation statement in previously published article","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100746","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100746","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100746"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144240015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100744
{"title":"Erratum regarding missing Selection and participation statement in previously published article","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100744","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100744","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100744"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144239706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100743
{"title":"Erratum regarding missing parent’s consent statement due to children participation in previously published article","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100743","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100743","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100743"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144239704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100741
{"title":"Erratum regarding missing relevant Declaration of Competing Interest statements in previously published article","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100741","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100741","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100741"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144240017","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-05-19DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100749
Andrea Gauthier , Asimina Vasalou , Alejandra Tisnes Londoño , Na Wu , Billy Konyani
This study takes a research-through-design approach to explore the potentials and boundaries of empowerment through interactive data visualisation (IDV) for children's collective environmental and climate action, contextualised within an existing and globally impactful environmental education initiative, Eco-Schools. We speculate how the social valences inherent to IDV mediate collaboration between children, their peers, and adult school stakeholders and identify the critical skills and scaffolding required by children to make use of IDV toward collective environmental action. We note the dichotomy of dutiful versus disruptive actions proposed by children, underscoring the necessity for stakeholder involvement from the outset to ensure ethical viability of such initiatives. Related to this, we reflect on the ethical implications of IDV as a symbol of children's agency, particularly when their efforts to engage peers and authority figures yield limited results. Ultimately, this study emphasises the importance of stakeholder collaboration in maximizing the potential of IDV as a multi-functional tool in children's collective environmental action with the aim to inform the design of future climate change education programmes and IDV tools.
{"title":"Empowering young environmental leaders: Designing interactive data visualisation to foster children's agency in eco-schools","authors":"Andrea Gauthier , Asimina Vasalou , Alejandra Tisnes Londoño , Na Wu , Billy Konyani","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100749","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100749","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study takes a research-through-design approach to explore the potentials and boundaries of empowerment through interactive data visualisation (IDV) for children's collective environmental and climate action, contextualised within an existing and globally impactful environmental education initiative, Eco-Schools. We speculate how the social valences inherent to IDV mediate collaboration between children, their peers, and adult school stakeholders and identify the critical skills and scaffolding required by children to make use of IDV toward collective environmental action. We note the dichotomy of dutiful versus disruptive actions proposed by children, underscoring the necessity for stakeholder involvement from the outset to ensure ethical viability of such initiatives. Related to this, we reflect on the ethical implications of IDV as a symbol of children's agency, particularly when their efforts to engage peers and authority figures yield limited results. Ultimately, this study emphasises the importance of stakeholder collaboration in maximizing the potential of IDV as a multi-functional tool in children's collective environmental action with the aim to inform the design of future climate change education programmes and IDV tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100749"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144107543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Past research has shown that children as young as 4–6 years can learn to code through virtual (digital) or plugged (physical, analogic) coding activities, and that exposure to those activities benefits children's cognitive skills too. Indeed, two executive functions (EFs), planning and response inhibition, seem to be strongly associated with coding. However, it remains unclear whether children's cognitive response to virtual coding instruction varies with children's age. Only a few studies to date, mostly focused on older students (aged 10–18 years), have examined age-related differences in response to coding instruction. No such studies as yet have explored whether age differences in learning to code also translate in differential cognitive benefits of coding with children's age. The present study compared the response to an 8-h coding intervention of 273 first graders (5–7 years) and 164 fourth graders (8–10 years), examining whether their respective gains in coding abilities, planning (Tower of London test), and response inhibition (Stroop test and NEPSY-II square/circle test) differed following exposure to coding. Multilevel analyses with socio-economic status covariate show significant effects of the intervention on both 1st and 4th graders' coding skills and across all cognitive measures (planning accuracy, response inhibition accuracy and time). For coding accuracy, both first and fourth graders improved, with large effect sizes (d = −1.53 for first graders, d = −1.84 for fourth graders). The experimental groups showed greater post-test gains in planning accuracy in both grades (d = −1.44 for first graders, d = −0.91 for fourth graders). First graders decreased inhibition errors significantly after the intervention in both NEPSY-II and Stroop tasks (respectively, t(425) = 8.21, p < 0.001, d = 0.80; t(425) = 11.37, p < 0.001, d = 1.10), as well as the fourth graders (t(427) = 3.79, p < 0.001, d = 0.38 in NEPSY-II, t(427) = 4.56, p < 0.001, d = 0.44 in Stroop).
These findings suggest that coding interventions designed with age-appropriate complexity can support not only the development of coding abilities but also enhance EFs skills across different age levels. The intervention's strong impact on younger children suggests that structured coding interventions should be introduced early as a fundamental component of childhood education.
过去的研究表明,4-6岁的儿童就可以通过虚拟(数字)或插入(物理、类比)编码活动来学习编程,接触这些活动也有益于儿童的认知技能。事实上,两个执行功能(EFs),计划和反应抑制,似乎与编码密切相关。然而,目前尚不清楚儿童对虚拟编码教学的认知反应是否随年龄的变化而变化。迄今为止,只有少数研究(主要针对年龄较大的学生(10-18岁))研究了与年龄相关的编码教学反应差异。目前还没有这样的研究探讨学习编码的年龄差异是否也会转化为儿童年龄编码的不同认知益处。本研究比较了273名一年级学生(5-7岁)和164名四年级学生(8-10岁)对8小时编码干预的反应,考察了他们在编码能力、计划(伦敦塔测试)和反应抑制(Stroop测试和nepsyi - ii方/圆测试)方面的各自增益是否在编码暴露后有所不同。社会经济地位协变量的多水平分析显示,干预对一年级和四年级学生的编码技能和所有认知测量(计划准确性、反应抑制准确性和时间)都有显著影响。在编码准确性方面,一年级和四年级学生均有提高,且效应量较大(一年级的d = - 1.53,四年级的d = - 1.84)。实验组在两个年级的计划准确性测试后都有较大的提高(一年级的d = - 1.44,四年级的d = - 0.91)。干预后,一年级学生在NEPSY-II和Stroop任务上的抑制错误显著减少(t(425) = 8.21, p <;0.001, d = 0.80;T (425) = 11.37, p <;0.001, d = 1.10),四年级学生(t(427) = 3.79, p <;0.001,在NEPSY-II d = 0.38, t (427) = 4.56, p & lt;0.001,在Stroop中d = 0.44)。这些研究结果表明,具有与年龄相适应的复杂性的编码干预不仅可以支持编码能力的发展,还可以提高不同年龄层次的EFs技能。干预措施对年幼儿童的强烈影响表明,应尽早引入结构化编码干预措施,作为儿童教育的基本组成部分。
{"title":"Age-related effects of coding interventions","authors":"Chiara Montuori , Lucia Ronconi , Gabriele Pozzan , Costanza Padova , Tullio Vardanega , Barbara Arfé","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100747","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.ijcci.2025.100747","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Past research has shown that children as young as 4–6 years can learn to code through virtual (digital) or plugged (physical, analogic) coding activities, and that exposure to those activities benefits children's cognitive skills too. Indeed, two executive functions (EFs), planning and response inhibition, seem to be strongly associated with coding. However, it remains unclear whether children's cognitive response to virtual coding instruction varies with children's age. Only a few studies to date, mostly focused on older students (aged 10–18 years), have examined age-related differences in response to coding instruction. No such studies as yet have explored whether age differences in learning to code also translate in differential cognitive benefits of coding with children's age. The present study compared the response to an 8-h coding intervention of 273 first graders (5–7 years) and 164 fourth graders (8–10 years), examining whether their respective gains in coding abilities, planning (Tower of London test), and response inhibition (Stroop test and NEPSY-II square/circle test) differed following exposure to coding. Multilevel analyses with socio-economic status covariate show significant effects of the intervention on both 1st and 4th graders' coding skills and across all cognitive measures (planning accuracy, response inhibition accuracy and time). For coding accuracy, both first and fourth graders improved, with large effect sizes (<em>d</em> = −1.53 for first graders, <em>d</em> = −1.84 for fourth graders). The experimental groups showed greater post-test gains in planning accuracy in both grades (<em>d</em> = −1.44 for first graders, <em>d</em> = −0.91 for fourth graders). First graders decreased inhibition errors significantly after the intervention in both NEPSY-II and Stroop tasks (respectively, t(425) = 8.21, <em>p</em> < 0.001, <em>d</em> = 0.80; t(425) = 11.37, <em>p</em> < 0.001, <em>d</em> = 1.10), as well as the fourth graders (t(427) = 3.79, <em>p</em> < 0.001, <em>d</em> = 0.38 in NEPSY-II, t(427) = 4.56, <em>p</em> < 0.001, <em>d</em> = 0.44 in Stroop).</div><div>These findings suggest that coding interventions designed with age-appropriate complexity can support not only the development of coding abilities but also enhance EFs skills across different age levels. The intervention's strong impact on younger children suggests that structured coding interventions should be introduced early as a fundamental component of childhood education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38431,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100747"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144154448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}