首页 > 最新文献

International Journal of Spine Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Nonoperative Management of Isolated Thoracolumbar Flexion Distraction Injuries: A Single-Center Study. 孤立性胸腰椎屈曲牵引损伤的非手术治疗:单中心研究
IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.14444/8619
Reed Butler, Connor Donley, Zuhair Mohammed, Jacob Lepard, Eric Vess, Nicholas Andrews, Gerald McGwin, Sakthivel Rajaram, Steven M Theiss

Background: Nonoperative management is an appealing option for purely transosseous thoracolumbar flexion-distraction injuries given the prospects of osseous healing and restoration of the posterior tension band complex. This study seeks to examine differences in outcomes following flexion-distraction injuries after operative and nonoperative management.

Methods: This study reviews all patients at a single Level 1 trauma center from 2004 to 2022 with AO Spine B1 thoracolumbar injuries treated operatively vs nonoperatively. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 16 years, computed tomography-confirmed transosseous flexion-distraction injuries, and at least 3 months of follow-up with available imaging. The primary outcome assessed was a change in local Cobb angles, with secondary outcomes consisting of complications, time to return to work, and need for subsequent operative fixation.

Results: Initial Cobb angles in the operative (n = 14) vs nonoperative group (n = 13) were -5° and -13°, respectively (P = 0.225), indicating kyphotic alignment in both cohorts. We noted a significant difference in Cobb angles between cohorts at first follow-up (2.6° and -13.9°, P = 0.015) and within the operative cohort from presentation to first follow-up (P = 0.029). At the second follow-up, there was no significant difference in Cobb angles between cohorts (3.6° and -12.6°, P = 0.07). No significant differences were noted in complication rates (P = 1), time to return to work (P = 0.193), or resolution of subjective back pain (P = 0.193). No crossover was noted.

Conclusions: Nonoperative management of minimally displaced transosseous flexion-distraction injuries is a safe alternative to surgery. Patient factors, such as compliance with follow-up, and location of the injury should be factored into the surgeon's management recommendation.

Clinical relevance: Overall, no significant differences in outcomes and complications were noted following nonoperative management of AO Spine B1 injuries, indicating the potential for these injuries to be managed conservatively.

Level of evidence: 3:

背景:鉴于骨性愈合和后拉力带复合体恢复的前景,非手术治疗是纯经骨性胸腰椎屈曲牵引损伤的一种吸引人的选择。本研究旨在探讨屈曲牵引损伤后手术治疗和非手术治疗在疗效上的差异:本研究回顾了 2004 年至 2022 年在一家一级创伤中心接受 AO 脊柱 B1 胸腰椎损伤手术治疗与非手术治疗的所有患者。纳入标准为年龄大于 16 岁、经计算机断层扫描确认为经骨屈曲牵引损伤、至少随访 3 个月并获得可用影像学资料。评估的主要结果是局部 Cobb 角的变化,次要结果包括并发症、恢复工作时间和后续手术固定的需要:结果:手术组(n = 14)与非手术组(n = 13)的初始 Cobb 角分别为-5°和-13°(P = 0.225),这表明两组患者都存在畸形排列。我们注意到,在首次随访(2.6° 和 -13.9°,P = 0.015)和手术组内从发病到首次随访(P = 0.029)期间,各组间的 Cobb 角存在明显差异。第二次随访时,各组间的 Cobb 角无明显差异(3.6° 和 -12.6°,P = 0.07)。并发症发生率(P = 1)、恢复工作时间(P = 0.193)或主观背痛缓解程度(P = 0.193)均无明显差异。没有发现交叉现象:结论:非手术治疗微小移位的经骨屈伸损伤是一种安全的手术替代方案。外科医生在提出治疗建议时应考虑患者的因素,如随访的依从性和损伤的位置:总体而言,AO脊柱B1损伤的非手术治疗在疗效和并发症方面没有明显差异,这表明这些损伤有可能通过保守治疗得到控制:3:
{"title":"Nonoperative Management of Isolated Thoracolumbar Flexion Distraction Injuries: A Single-Center Study.","authors":"Reed Butler, Connor Donley, Zuhair Mohammed, Jacob Lepard, Eric Vess, Nicholas Andrews, Gerald McGwin, Sakthivel Rajaram, Steven M Theiss","doi":"10.14444/8619","DOIUrl":"10.14444/8619","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonoperative management is an appealing option for purely transosseous thoracolumbar flexion-distraction injuries given the prospects of osseous healing and restoration of the posterior tension band complex. This study seeks to examine differences in outcomes following flexion-distraction injuries after operative and nonoperative management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study reviews all patients at a single Level 1 trauma center from 2004 to 2022 with AO Spine B1 thoracolumbar injuries treated operatively vs nonoperatively. Inclusion criteria were age greater than 16 years, computed tomography-confirmed transosseous flexion-distraction injuries, and at least 3 months of follow-up with available imaging. The primary outcome assessed was a change in local Cobb angles, with secondary outcomes consisting of complications, time to return to work, and need for subsequent operative fixation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initial Cobb angles in the operative (<i>n</i> = 14) vs nonoperative group (<i>n</i> = 13) were -5° and -13°, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.225), indicating kyphotic alignment in both cohorts. We noted a significant difference in Cobb angles between cohorts at first follow-up (2.6° and -13.9°, <i>P</i> = 0.015) and within the operative cohort from presentation to first follow-up (<i>P</i> = 0.029). At the second follow-up, there was no significant difference in Cobb angles between cohorts (3.6° and -12.6°, <i>P</i> = 0.07). No significant differences were noted in complication rates (<i>P</i> = 1), time to return to work (<i>P</i> = 0.193), or resolution of subjective back pain (<i>P</i> = 0.193). No crossover was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonoperative management of minimally displaced transosseous flexion-distraction injuries is a safe alternative to surgery. Patient factors, such as compliance with follow-up, and location of the injury should be factored into the surgeon's management recommendation.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Overall, no significant differences in outcomes and complications were noted following nonoperative management of AO Spine B1 injuries, indicating the potential for these injuries to be managed conservatively.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"383-388"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483580/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141724655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Bilateral Expandable Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages: A Finite Element Analysis Study. 前路腰椎体间融合器与双侧可扩张经椎间孔腰椎体间融合器固定架的生物力学比较分析:有限元分析研究。
IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.14444/8630
Mohamad Bakhaidar, Balaji Harinathan, Karthik Banurekha Devaraj, Andrew DeGroot, Narayan Yoganandan, Saman Shabani

Background: Expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages could offer an alternative to anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Bilateral cage insertion enhances endplate coverage, potentially improving stability and fusion rates and maximizing segmental lordosis. This study aims to compare the biomechanical properties of bilateral expandable TLIF cages to ALIF cages using finite element modeling.

Methods: We used a validated 3-dimensional finite element model of the lumbar spine. ALIF and TLIF cages were created based on available product data. Our focus was on analyzing spinal motion in the sagittal plane, evaluating forces transmitted through the vertebrae, and comparing an ALIF model with various TLIF cage models.

Results: The largest TLIF cage model exhibited a 407.9% increase in flexion motion and a 42.1% decrease in extension motion compared with the ALIF cage. The second largest TLIF cages resulted in more flexion motion and less extension motion compared with ALIF, while smaller cages were inferior to ALIF. ALIF cages were associated with increased adjacent segment motion compared with TLIF cages, primarily in extension. Endplate stress analysis revealed higher stress in the ALIF cage model with a more uniform stress distribution.

Conclusion: ALIF cages excel in stabilizing L5 to S1 during flexion, while largest TLIF cages offer superior stability in extension. Large bilateral TLIF cages may provide biomechanical stability comparable to ALIF, especially in extension and could potentially reduce the risk of adjacent segment disease with lower adjacent segment motion.

Level of evidence: 5:

背景:可扩张的经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合器(TLIF)可替代前路腰椎椎体间融合器(ALIF)。双侧插入保持架可增强终板覆盖,从而提高稳定性和融合率,并最大限度地增加节段前凸。本研究旨在通过有限元建模比较双侧可扩张 TLIF 保持架与 ALIF 保持架的生物力学特性:方法:我们使用经过验证的腰椎三维有限元模型。方法:我们使用了经过验证的三维有限元模型,并根据现有产品数据创建了 ALIF 和 TLIF 骨架。我们的重点是分析矢状面上的脊柱运动,评估通过椎骨传递的力,并比较 ALIF 模型和各种 TLIF 保持架模型:结果:最大的 TLIF 保持架模型与 ALIF 保持架相比,屈曲运动增加了 407.9%,伸展运动减少了 42.1%。与 TLIF 保持架相比,ALIF 保持架增加了邻近节段的运动,主要是伸展运动。终板应力分析显示,ALIF固定架模型的应力更高,应力分布更均匀:结论:ALIF 保持架在屈曲时能很好地稳定 L5 至 S1,而最大的 TLIF 保持架在伸展时能提供更好的稳定性。大型双侧 TLIF 保持架可提供与 ALIF 相当的生物力学稳定性,尤其是在伸展时,并有可能通过较低的邻近节段运动降低邻近节段疾病的风险:5:
{"title":"Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Bilateral Expandable Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages: A Finite Element Analysis Study.","authors":"Mohamad Bakhaidar, Balaji Harinathan, Karthik Banurekha Devaraj, Andrew DeGroot, Narayan Yoganandan, Saman Shabani","doi":"10.14444/8630","DOIUrl":"10.14444/8630","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cages could offer an alternative to anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Bilateral cage insertion enhances endplate coverage, potentially improving stability and fusion rates and maximizing segmental lordosis. This study aims to compare the biomechanical properties of bilateral expandable TLIF cages to ALIF cages using finite element modeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a validated 3-dimensional finite element model of the lumbar spine. ALIF and TLIF cages were created based on available product data. Our focus was on analyzing spinal motion in the sagittal plane, evaluating forces transmitted through the vertebrae, and comparing an ALIF model with various TLIF cage models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The largest TLIF cage model exhibited a 407.9% increase in flexion motion and a 42.1% decrease in extension motion compared with the ALIF cage. The second largest TLIF cages resulted in more flexion motion and less extension motion compared with ALIF, while smaller cages were inferior to ALIF. ALIF cages were associated with increased adjacent segment motion compared with TLIF cages, primarily in extension. Endplate stress analysis revealed higher stress in the ALIF cage model with a more uniform stress distribution.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ALIF cages excel in stabilizing L5 to S1 during flexion, while largest TLIF cages offer superior stability in extension. Large bilateral TLIF cages may provide biomechanical stability comparable to ALIF, especially in extension and could potentially reduce the risk of adjacent segment disease with lower adjacent segment motion.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 5: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"441-447"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483624/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142112998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
High Lumbar Spinal Fusion Rates Using Cellular Bone Allograft Irrespective of Surgical Approach. 使用细胞骨异体移植的腰椎融合率高,与手术方法无关
IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.14444/8612
Todd Lansford, Daniel K Park, Joshua J Wind, Pierce Nunley, Timothy A Peppers, Anthony Russo, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Jonathan Sembrano, Jung Yoo, Jonathan Sales

Background: Mounting evidence demonstrates a promising safety and efficacy profile for spinal fusion procedures using cellular bone allograft (CBA). However, limited data exists on fusion outcomes stratified by surgical approach. The current study investigates the effectiveness of CBA in lumbar spinal fusion by surgical approach (ie, anterior, lateral, and posterior approaches).

Methods: Patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion with CBA (Trinity Elite) were enrolled into a prospective, multi-center, open-label clinical study (NCT02969616). Fusion status was assessed by an independent review of dynamic radiographs and computed tomography images. Clinical outcome measures included quality of life (QoL; EQ5D), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), and pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) for back pain and leg pain). Patient data extending to 24 months were analyzed in a post-hoc analysis.

Results: A total of 252 patients underwent interbody fusion (159 women; 93 men). Patients had a mean age of 58.3 years (SD 12.5), height of 168.3 cm (SD 10.2), and weight of 87.3 kg (SD 20.0) with a body mass index of 30.8 kg/m2 (SD 6.5). At 12 months, the overall fusion success rate for bridging bone was 98.5%; fusion success was 98.1%, 100.0%, and 97.9% for anterior, lateral, and posterior approaches, respectively. At 24 months, the overall fusion success rate for bridging bone was 98.9%; fusion success was 97.9%, 100.0%, and 98.8% for anterior, lateral, and posterior approaches, respectively. The surgical approach did not significantly impact fusion success. A significant (P < 0.0001) improvement in QoL, pain, and disability scores was also observed. Significant differences in the ODI, VAS, and EQ5D were observed between the treatment groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: CBA represents an attractive alternative to autograft alone, reporting a high rate of successful fusion and clinical outcomes across various surgical approaches.

Clinical relevance: The use of CBA for spinal fusion procedures, regardless of surgical approach, provides high rates of fusion with a favorable safety profile and improved patient outcomes.

Level of evidence: 4:

Trial registration: NCT02969616.

背景:越来越多的证据表明,使用细胞骨异体移植(CBA)进行脊柱融合手术具有良好的安全性和有效性。然而,按手术方法分层的融合效果数据有限。本研究按手术方式(即前路、侧路和后路)调查了细胞骨异体移植在腰椎融合术中的有效性:一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签临床研究(NCT02969616)招募了接受CBA(Trinity Elite)腰椎融合术的患者。融合状态由动态X光片和计算机断层扫描图像的独立审查进行评估。临床结果指标包括生活质量(QoL;EQ5D)、残疾(Oswestry残疾指数[ODI])和疼痛(腰痛和腿痛的视觉模拟量表[VAS])。在一项事后分析中,对患者长达 24 个月的数据进行了分析:共有 252 名患者接受了椎间融合术(女性 159 人;男性 93 人)。患者的平均年龄为 58.3 岁(SD 12.5),身高为 168.3 厘米(SD 10.2),体重为 87.3 千克(SD 20.0),体重指数为 30.8 千克/平方米(SD 6.5)。12个月时,桥接骨的总体融合成功率为98.5%;前路、侧路和后路的融合成功率分别为98.1%、100.0%和97.9%。24 个月时,桥接骨的总体融合成功率为 98.9%;前路、侧路和后路的融合成功率分别为 97.9%、100.0% 和 98.8%。手术方式对融合成功率没有明显影响。患者的生活质量、疼痛和残疾评分也有明显改善(P < 0.0001)。治疗组之间在ODI、VAS和EQ5D方面存在显著差异(P < 0.05):结论:CBA是一种有吸引力的替代自体移植物的方法,在各种手术方法中都有较高的融合成功率和临床疗效:临床相关性:在脊柱融合术中使用CBA,无论采用哪种手术方法,都能获得较高的融合成功率,同时具有良好的安全性,并能改善患者预后:4:试验注册:NCT02969616。
{"title":"High Lumbar Spinal Fusion Rates Using Cellular Bone Allograft Irrespective of Surgical Approach.","authors":"Todd Lansford, Daniel K Park, Joshua J Wind, Pierce Nunley, Timothy A Peppers, Anthony Russo, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Jonathan Sembrano, Jung Yoo, Jonathan Sales","doi":"10.14444/8612","DOIUrl":"10.14444/8612","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mounting evidence demonstrates a promising safety and efficacy profile for spinal fusion procedures using cellular bone allograft (CBA). However, limited data exists on fusion outcomes stratified by surgical approach. The current study investigates the effectiveness of CBA in lumbar spinal fusion by surgical approach (ie, anterior, lateral, and posterior approaches).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion with CBA (Trinity Elite) were enrolled into a prospective, multi-center, open-label clinical study (NCT02969616). Fusion status was assessed by an independent review of dynamic radiographs and computed tomography images. Clinical outcome measures included quality of life (QoL; EQ5D), disability (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), and pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) for back pain and leg pain). Patient data extending to 24 months were analyzed in a post-hoc analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 252 patients underwent interbody fusion (159 women; 93 men). Patients had a mean age of 58.3 years (SD 12.5), height of 168.3 cm (SD 10.2), and weight of 87.3 kg (SD 20.0) with a body mass index of 30.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (SD 6.5). At 12 months, the overall fusion success rate for bridging bone was 98.5%; fusion success was 98.1%, 100.0%, and 97.9% for anterior, lateral, and posterior approaches, respectively. At 24 months, the overall fusion success rate for bridging bone was 98.9%; fusion success was 97.9%, 100.0%, and 98.8% for anterior, lateral, and posterior approaches, respectively. The surgical approach did not significantly impact fusion success. A significant (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) improvement in QoL, pain, and disability scores was also observed. Significant differences in the ODI, VAS, and EQ5D were observed between the treatment groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBA represents an attractive alternative to autograft alone, reporting a high rate of successful fusion and clinical outcomes across various surgical approaches.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The use of CBA for spinal fusion procedures, regardless of surgical approach, provides high rates of fusion with a favorable safety profile and improved patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT02969616.</p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"355-364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483417/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141761494","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association of Elevated Perioperative Blood Glucose With Complications and Postoperative Outcomes Following Traumatic Spine Surgery. 围手术期血糖升高与创伤性脊柱手术并发症和术后结果的关系
IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.14444/8627
Yianni Bakaes, Michael Spitnale, Chase Gauthier, Justin E Kung, David Edelman, Richard Bidwell, Michel Shahid, Gregory Grabowski

Background: Perioperative blood glucose control has been demonstrated to influence outcomes following spine surgery, though this association has not been fully elucidated in patients with traumatic spine injuries. This study sought to determine the association between perioperative blood glucose levels and complications or outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery due to injury.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted to identify patients who underwent spine surgery due to traumatic injuries between 1 March 2020 and 29 September 2022 at a single academic institution. Descriptive factors, complications, and outcomes were compared between those with a postoperative blood glucose level of <200 mg/dL and those with a preoperative glucose of <200 mg/dL.

Results: Patients with a post- and preoperative blood glucose of ≥200 mg/dL had significantly higher odds of respiratory complications (OR = 2.1, 2.1, P = 0.02, 0.03), skin/wound complications (OR = 2.2, 2.8, P = 0.04, 0.03), and increased hospital length of stay (OR = 9.6, 12.1, P = 0.02, 0.03) compared with those with blood glucose of <200 mg/dL. Those with postoperative glucose ≥200 mg/dL also had significantly higher odds of inpatient mortality (OR = 4.5, P = 0.04) when controlling for confounding factors. Neither pre- nor postoperative blood glucose of ≥200 mg/dL was associated with an improvement in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale score at the final follow-up when controlling for multiple confounding factors (P = 0.44, 0.06).

Conclusion: Elevated blood glucose both pre- and postoperatively was associated with an increased rate of postoperative complications and negative postoperative outcomes. However, there was no association between elevated blood glucose levels and neurological recovery following traumatic spinal injury.

Level of evidence: 3:

背景:围手术期血糖控制已被证实会影响脊柱手术后的预后,但这种关联尚未在脊柱外伤患者中得到充分阐明。本研究旨在确定因外伤接受脊柱手术的患者围手术期血糖水平与并发症或预后之间的关系:研究人员进行了一项回顾性研究,以确定 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2022 年 9 月 29 日期间在一家学术机构因外伤接受脊柱手术的患者。比较了术后血糖水平为 "0 "的患者的描述性因素、并发症和预后:在控制了混杂因素后,术后和术前血糖≥200 mg/dL 的患者发生呼吸系统并发症(OR = 2.1,2.1,P = 0.02,0.03)、皮肤/伤口并发症(OR = 2.2,2.8,P = 0.04,0.03)和住院时间延长(OR = 9.6,12.1,P = 0.02,0.03)的几率明显高于血糖≥200 mg/dL 的患者(P = 0.04)。在控制多种混杂因素的情况下,术前或术后血糖≥200 mg/dL 均与最终随访时美国脊柱损伤协会损伤量表评分的改善无关(P = 0.44,0.06):结论:术前和术后血糖升高与术后并发症发生率增加和术后不良预后有关。结论:术前和术后血糖升高与术后并发症和不良术后结果的发生率增加有关,但血糖升高与创伤性脊柱损伤后的神经功能恢复无关:3:
{"title":"Association of Elevated Perioperative Blood Glucose With Complications and Postoperative Outcomes Following Traumatic Spine Surgery.","authors":"Yianni Bakaes, Michael Spitnale, Chase Gauthier, Justin E Kung, David Edelman, Richard Bidwell, Michel Shahid, Gregory Grabowski","doi":"10.14444/8627","DOIUrl":"10.14444/8627","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative blood glucose control has been demonstrated to influence outcomes following spine surgery, though this association has not been fully elucidated in patients with traumatic spine injuries. This study sought to determine the association between perioperative blood glucose levels and complications or outcomes in patients undergoing spine surgery due to injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted to identify patients who underwent spine surgery due to traumatic injuries between 1 March 2020 and 29 September 2022 at a single academic institution. Descriptive factors, complications, and outcomes were compared between those with a postoperative blood glucose level of <200 mg/dL and those with a preoperative glucose of <200 mg/dL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with a post- and preoperative blood glucose of ≥200 mg/dL had significantly higher odds of respiratory complications (OR = 2.1, 2.1, <i>P</i> = 0.02, 0.03), skin/wound complications (OR = 2.2, 2.8, <i>P</i> = 0.04, 0.03), and increased hospital length of stay (OR = 9.6, 12.1, <i>P</i> = 0.02, 0.03) compared with those with blood glucose of <200 mg/dL. Those with postoperative glucose ≥200 mg/dL also had significantly higher odds of inpatient mortality (OR = 4.5, <i>P</i> = 0.04) when controlling for confounding factors. Neither pre- nor postoperative blood glucose of ≥200 mg/dL was associated with an improvement in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale score at the final follow-up when controlling for multiple confounding factors (<i>P</i> = 0.44, 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated blood glucose both pre- and postoperatively was associated with an increased rate of postoperative complications and negative postoperative outcomes. However, there was no association between elevated blood glucose levels and neurological recovery following traumatic spinal injury.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"418-424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483577/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141972026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Qualitative Evaluation of Paraspinal Musculature After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Prospective Study. 微创腰椎减压术后脊柱旁肌肉组织的定性评估:一项前瞻性研究
IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.14444/8631
Ramon Oliveira Soares, Nelson Astur, Lucas Rabello de Oliveira, Michel Kanas, Marcelo Wajchenberg, Delio Eulálio Martins

Background: To quantify fatty infiltration and degree of paraspinal muscle degeneration in patients submitted to tubular microdiscectomy and conventional open microdiscectomy.

Methods: A prospective cohort of patients was submitted to microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation after failure of conservative treatment. Selection of the technique was based on the surgeon's preference. Analysis of the multifidus muscle was performed using the Goutallier system and the percentage of fat in the muscle. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was used, and statistical analysis was carried out using the Wilcoxon test and Spearman correlation test using a significance level of 5%.

Results: Thirty-two patients were included in the study. The percentage of fatty infiltration in the muscle increased on both sides of the spine 1 year after surgery, although only the ipsilateral side presented statistical significance in patients submitted to conventional microdiscectomy (43.3% preoperative and 57.8% postoperative). Muscular degeneration increased significantly ipsilateral to the disc herniation according to the Goutallier classification (grades 1-2) for both interventions. No statistically significant difference was found for fatty infiltration scores or for the degree of muscular degeneration of the multifidus in the comparative analysis of the methods.

Conclusions: Muscular damage resulting from surgery of lumbar disc herniation significantly increases fatty infiltration and degeneration of the multifidus. Muscular degeneration was associated with worsening back pain.

Clinical relevance: While no significant difference was found between the techniques, the tubular minimally invasive approach shows a tendency for less muscle damage. These findings highlight the importance of minimizing muscle injury during surgery to improve postoperative recovery and long-term outcomes.

Level of evidence: 4:

背景:量化管状显微椎间盘切除术和传统开放式显微椎间盘切除术患者的脂肪浸润和脊柱旁肌肉变性程度:量化接受管状显微椎间盘切除术和传统开放式显微椎间盘切除术患者的脂肪浸润和脊柱旁肌肉变性程度:方法:对保守治疗失败后接受显微椎间盘切除术治疗的腰椎间盘突出症患者进行前瞻性队列研究。根据外科医生的偏好选择技术。使用 Goutallier 系统对多裂肌进行了分析,并测定了肌肉中脂肪的百分比。使用术前和术后1年的T2加权磁共振成像,使用Wilcoxon检验和Spearman相关性检验进行统计分析,显著性水平为5%:研究共纳入 32 例患者。术后1年,脊柱两侧肌肉中脂肪浸润的比例均有所增加,但在接受传统显微椎间盘切除术的患者中,只有同侧的脂肪浸润比例具有统计学意义(术前为43.3%,术后为57.8%)。根据 Goutallier 分级法(1-2 级),两种治疗方法的椎间盘突出症同侧肌肉退行性变均明显增加。在两种方法的比较分析中,脂肪浸润评分和多裂肌的肌肉变性程度没有发现明显的统计学差异:结论:腰椎间盘突出症手术造成的肌肉损伤会显著增加多裂肌的脂肪浸润和变性。结论:腰椎间盘突出症手术导致的肌肉损伤会明显增加多裂肌的脂肪浸润和退变,肌肉退变与腰痛加重有关:临床相关性:虽然两种技术之间没有发现明显差异,但管状微创方法对肌肉的损伤更小。这些发现强调了在手术中尽量减少肌肉损伤对改善术后恢复和长期疗效的重要性:4:
{"title":"Qualitative Evaluation of Paraspinal Musculature After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Ramon Oliveira Soares, Nelson Astur, Lucas Rabello de Oliveira, Michel Kanas, Marcelo Wajchenberg, Delio Eulálio Martins","doi":"10.14444/8631","DOIUrl":"10.14444/8631","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To quantify fatty infiltration and degree of paraspinal muscle degeneration in patients submitted to tubular microdiscectomy and conventional open microdiscectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of patients was submitted to microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation after failure of conservative treatment. Selection of the technique was based on the surgeon's preference. Analysis of the multifidus muscle was performed using the Goutallier system and the percentage of fat in the muscle. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was used, and statistical analysis was carried out using the Wilcoxon test and Spearman correlation test using a significance level of 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two patients were included in the study. The percentage of fatty infiltration in the muscle increased on both sides of the spine 1 year after surgery, although only the ipsilateral side presented statistical significance in patients submitted to conventional microdiscectomy (43.3% preoperative and 57.8% postoperative). Muscular degeneration increased significantly ipsilateral to the disc herniation according to the Goutallier classification (grades 1-2) for both interventions. No statistically significant difference was found for fatty infiltration scores or for the degree of muscular degeneration of the multifidus in the comparative analysis of the methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Muscular damage resulting from surgery of lumbar disc herniation significantly increases fatty infiltration and degeneration of the multifidus. Muscular degeneration was associated with worsening back pain.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>While no significant difference was found between the techniques, the tubular minimally invasive approach shows a tendency for less muscle damage. These findings highlight the importance of minimizing muscle injury during surgery to improve postoperative recovery and long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"448-454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483563/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142074139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Technique, Safety, and Accuracy Assessment of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Utilizing Computer-Assisted Navigation in Lateral Decubitus Single-Position Surgery. 在侧卧位单体位手术中利用计算机辅助导航进行经皮椎弓根螺钉置入的技术、安全性和准确性评估
IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.14444/8613
Anna-Katharina Calek, Bettina Hochreiter, Aaron J Buckland

Background: Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement has become a pivotal technique in spinal surgery, increasing surgical efficiency and limiting the invasiveness of surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy of computer-assisted PPS placement with a standardized technique in the lateral decubitus position.

Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on 44 consecutive patients treated between 2021 and 2023 with lateral decubitus single-position surgery. PPS placement was assessed by computed tomography scans, and breaches were graded based on the magnitude and direction of the breach. Facet joint violations were assessed. Variables collected included patient demographics, indication, intraoperative complications, operative time, fluoroscopy time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay.

Results: Forty-four patients, with 220 PPSs were identified. About 79.5% of all patients underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion only, 13.6% underwent lateral lumbar interbody fusion only, and 6.8% received a combination of both anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eleven screw breaches (5%) were identified: 10 were Grade II breaches (<2 mm), and 1 was a Grade IV breach (>4 mm). All breaches were lateral. About 63.6% involved down-side screws indicating a trend toward the laterality of breaches for down-side pedicles. When analyzing breaches by level, 1.2% of screws at L5, 13% at L4, and 11.1% at L3 demonstrated Grade II breaches. No facet joint violations were noted.

Conclusion: PPS placement utilizing computer-assisted navigation in lateral decubitus single-position surgery is both safe and accurate. An overall breach rate of 5% was found; considering a safe zone of 2 mm, only 1 screw (0.5%) demonstrated a relevant breach.

Clinical relevance: PPS placement is both safe and accurate. Breaches are rare, and when breaches do occur, they are lateral.

Level of evidence: 3:

背景:经皮椎弓根螺钉(PPS)置入术已成为脊柱外科的一项关键技术,可提高手术效率并限制手术过程的创伤性。本研究旨在分析计算机辅助椎弓根螺钉置入术在侧卧位下采用标准化技术的准确性:方法:对 2021 年至 2023 年间使用侧卧位单体位手术治疗的 44 例连续患者的前瞻性数据进行了回顾性分析。通过计算机断层扫描评估PPS的放置情况,并根据破损的程度和方向对破损情况进行分级。还对侵犯面关节的情况进行了评估。收集的变量包括患者人口统计学、适应症、术中并发症、手术时间、透视时间、估计失血量和住院时间:结果:共发现 44 名患者,220 个 PPSs。约79.5%的患者仅接受了前路腰椎椎体间融合术,13.6%的患者仅接受了侧路腰椎椎体间融合术,6.8%的患者同时接受了前路腰椎椎体间融合术和侧路腰椎椎体间融合术。共发现 11 处螺钉破损(5%):其中 10 处为 II 级破损(4 毫米)。所有断裂均为侧向断裂。约 63.6% 涉及下侧螺钉,这表明下侧椎弓根有侧向破损的趋势。按级别分析破损情况时,1.2%的螺钉在L5、13%在L4、11.1%在L3出现二级破损。未发现任何侵犯面关节的情况:结论:在侧卧位单体位手术中利用计算机辅助导航进行PPS置入既安全又准确。总体破损率为 5%;考虑到安全区为 2 毫米,只有 1 颗螺钉(0.5%)出现相关破损:临床意义:PPS置入既安全又准确。临床相关性:PPS置入既安全又准确,极少发生破损,即使发生破损也是横向的:3:
{"title":"Technique, Safety, and Accuracy Assessment of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement Utilizing Computer-Assisted Navigation in Lateral Decubitus Single-Position Surgery.","authors":"Anna-Katharina Calek, Bettina Hochreiter, Aaron J Buckland","doi":"10.14444/8613","DOIUrl":"10.14444/8613","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placement has become a pivotal technique in spinal surgery, increasing surgical efficiency and limiting the invasiveness of surgical procedures. The aim of this study was to analyze the accuracy of computer-assisted PPS placement with a standardized technique in the lateral decubitus position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on 44 consecutive patients treated between 2021 and 2023 with lateral decubitus single-position surgery. PPS placement was assessed by computed tomography scans, and breaches were graded based on the magnitude and direction of the breach. Facet joint violations were assessed. Variables collected included patient demographics, indication, intraoperative complications, operative time, fluoroscopy time, estimated blood loss, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four patients, with 220 PPSs were identified. About 79.5% of all patients underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion only, 13.6% underwent lateral lumbar interbody fusion only, and 6.8% received a combination of both anterior lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eleven screw breaches (5%) were identified: 10 were Grade II breaches (<2 mm), and 1 was a Grade IV breach (>4 mm). All breaches were lateral. About 63.6% involved down-side screws indicating a trend toward the laterality of breaches for down-side pedicles. When analyzing breaches by level, 1.2% of screws at L5, 13% at L4, and 11.1% at L3 demonstrated Grade II breaches. No facet joint violations were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPS placement utilizing computer-assisted navigation in lateral decubitus single-position surgery is both safe and accurate. An overall breach rate of 5% was found; considering a safe zone of 2 mm, only 1 screw (0.5%) demonstrated a relevant breach.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>PPS placement is both safe and accurate. Breaches are rare, and when breaches do occur, they are lateral.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"365-374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483630/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141724657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Factors Associated With Unplanned Readmissions and Prolonged Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Primary Fusion for Congenital Scoliosis. 因先天性脊柱侧凸接受初次融合术的患者非计划再入院和住院时间延长的相关因素。
IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.14444/8614
Ari R Berg, John I Shin, Andrew Leggett, Ashok Para, Dhruv Mendiratta, Neil Kaushal, Michael J Vives

Background: Approximately 50% of patients with congenital scoliosis will require surgical treatment to prevent further progression. Outcomes following congenital scoliosis are sparse in the literature. The purpose of this study was to identify independent risk factors associated with unplanned readmission and prolonged length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing primary surgical treatment for congenital scoliosis.

Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Database-Pediatric was queried for database years 2016-2018 to identify patients with congenital scoliosis who underwent primary posterior fusion of the spine. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative variables, such as the number of levels fused and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classificaiton, were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses of patient factors were performed to test for association with readmission within 30 days and prolonged LOS (>4 days).

Results: Eight hundred sixteen patients were identified. The average age was 11.3 ± 4.02 years, and the mean postoperative LOS was 4.64 ± 3.71 days. Forty-three patients (5.40%) were readmitted, and 73 patients (8.96%) had prolonged LOS. Independent risk factors associated with prolonged LOS included chronic lung disease (P < 0.001), presence of a tracheostomy (P < 0.001), structural central nervous system abnormality (P = 0.039), oxygen support (P < 0.001), and number of levels fused (P = 0.008). The factors independently associated with unplanned readmission were fusion to the pelvis (P = 0.004) and LOS >4 days (P = 0.008).

Conclusions: Prolonged LOS and readmission are widely being used as quality and performance metrics for hospitals. Congenital scoliosis, which often progresses rapidly resulting in significant deformity, frequently requires surgery at an earlier age than idiopathic and neuromuscular deformity. Nevertheless, 30-day outcomes for surgical intervention have not been thoroughly studied. The present study identifies risk factors for prolonged LOS and readmission, which can facilitate preoperative planning, patient/family counseling, and postoperative care.

Clinical relevance: Congenital scoliosis management poses certain challenges that may be mitigated by understanding the risk factors for adverse outcomes following primary fusion surgery.

背景:大约50%的先天性脊柱侧凸患者需要接受手术治疗,以防止病情进一步恶化。关于先天性脊柱侧弯症的治疗效果,文献报道很少。本研究旨在确定与接受先天性脊柱侧凸初级手术治疗的患者非计划再入院和住院时间(LOS)延长相关的独立风险因素:查询了2016-2018年国家外科质量改进数据库-儿科,以确定接受脊柱原发性后路融合术的先天性脊柱侧凸患者。收集了患者的人口统计学特征、合并症和手术变量,如融合的层次数和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分类。对患者因素进行了单变量和多变量分析,以检验与30天内再次入院和住院时间延长(>4天)的关系:结果:共确定了 816 名患者。平均年龄为(11.3±4.02)岁,术后平均住院日为(4.64±3.71)天。43名患者(5.40%)再次入院,73名患者(8.96%)住院时间延长。与住院时间延长相关的独立风险因素包括慢性肺部疾病(P < 0.001)、气管造口术(P < 0.001)、中枢神经系统结构异常(P = 0.039)、氧气支持(P < 0.001)和融合层数(P = 0.008)。与非计划再入院独立相关的因素是骨盆融合(P = 0.004)和LOS >4天(P = 0.008):结论:住院时间延长和再入院被广泛用作医院的质量和绩效指标。先天性脊柱侧弯通常进展迅速,导致严重畸形,与特发性和神经肌肉畸形相比,需要手术治疗的年龄往往较早。然而,手术干预的 30 天疗效尚未得到深入研究。本研究确定了延长住院时间和再次入院的风险因素,这有助于术前规划、患者/家属咨询和术后护理:临床相关性:先天性脊柱侧凸的治疗面临一定的挑战,了解初级融合手术后不良后果的风险因素可以减轻这些挑战。
{"title":"Factors Associated With Unplanned Readmissions and Prolonged Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Primary Fusion for Congenital Scoliosis.","authors":"Ari R Berg, John I Shin, Andrew Leggett, Ashok Para, Dhruv Mendiratta, Neil Kaushal, Michael J Vives","doi":"10.14444/8614","DOIUrl":"10.14444/8614","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 50% of patients with congenital scoliosis will require surgical treatment to prevent further progression. Outcomes following congenital scoliosis are sparse in the literature. The purpose of this study was to identify independent risk factors associated with unplanned readmission and prolonged length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing primary surgical treatment for congenital scoliosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Surgical Quality Improvement Database-Pediatric was queried for database years 2016-2018 to identify patients with congenital scoliosis who underwent primary posterior fusion of the spine. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative variables, such as the number of levels fused and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classificaiton, were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses of patient factors were performed to test for association with readmission within 30 days and prolonged LOS (>4 days).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight hundred sixteen patients were identified. The average age was 11.3 ± 4.02 years, and the mean postoperative LOS was 4.64 ± 3.71 days. Forty-three patients (5.40%) were readmitted, and 73 patients (8.96%) had prolonged LOS. Independent risk factors associated with prolonged LOS included chronic lung disease (<i>P</i> < 0.001), presence of a tracheostomy (<i>P</i> < 0.001), structural central nervous system abnormality (<i>P</i> = 0.039), oxygen support (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and number of levels fused (<i>P</i> = 0.008). The factors independently associated with unplanned readmission were fusion to the pelvis (<i>P</i> = 0.004) and LOS >4 days (<i>P</i> = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prolonged LOS and readmission are widely being used as quality and performance metrics for hospitals. Congenital scoliosis, which often progresses rapidly resulting in significant deformity, frequently requires surgery at an earlier age than idiopathic and neuromuscular deformity. Nevertheless, 30-day outcomes for surgical intervention have not been thoroughly studied. The present study identifies risk factors for prolonged LOS and readmission, which can facilitate preoperative planning, patient/family counseling, and postoperative care.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Congenital scoliosis management poses certain challenges that may be mitigated by understanding the risk factors for adverse outcomes following primary fusion surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"375-382"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483433/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Revisiting the Posterior Approach for Cervical Radiculopathy Utilizing Endoscopic Techniques: A Favorable Short-Term Outcome and Cost Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. 重新审视利用内窥镜技术治疗颈椎病的后路方法:与前路颈椎椎间盘切除和融合术的短期疗效和成本比较。
IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.14444/8629
Campbell Liles, Hani Chanbour, Alexander T Lyons, Emma Ye, Omar Zakieh, Robert J Dambrino, Iyan Younus, Soren Jonzzon, Richard A Berkman, Julian G Lugo-Pico, Amir M Abtahi, Byron F Stephens, Scott L Zuckerman, Raymond J Gardocki

Background: Cervical radiculopathy is a spine ailment frequently requiring surgical decompression via anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior foraminotomy/discectomy. While endoscopic posterior foraminotomy/discectomy is gaining popularity, its financial impact remains understudied despite equivalent randomized long-term outcomes to ACDF. In a cohort of patients undergoing ACDF vs endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy, we sought to compare the total cost of the surgical episode while confirming an equivalent safety profile and perioperative outcomes.

Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy undergoing ACDF or endoscopic cervical foraminotomy between 2018 and 2023 was undertaken. Primary outcomes included the total cost of care for the initial surgical episode (not charges or reimbursement). Perioperative variables and neurological recovery were recorded. Multivariable analysis tested age, body mass index, race, gender, insurance type, operative time, and length of stay.

Results: A total of 38 ACDF and 17 endoscopic foraminotomy/discectomy operations were performed. All patients underwent single-level surgery except for 2 two-level endoscopic decompressions. No differences were found in baseline characteristics and symptom length except for younger age (46.8 ± 9.4 vs 57.6 ± 10.3, P = 0.002) and more smokers (18.4% vs 11.8%, P = 0.043) in the ACDF group. Actual hospital costs for the episode of surgical care were markedly higher in the ACDF cohort (mean ±95% CI; $27,782 ± $2011 vs $10,103 ± $720, P < 0.001) driven by the ACDF approach (β = $17,723, P < 0.001) on multivariable analysis. On sensitivity analysis, ACDF was never cost-efficient compared with endoscopic foraminotomy, and endoscopic failure rates of 64% were required for break-even cost. ACDF was associated with significantly longer operative time (167.7 ± 22.0 vs 142.7 ± 27.4 minutes, P < 0.001) and length of stay (1.1 ± 0.5 vs 0.1 ± 0.2 days, P < 0.001). No significant difference was found regarding 90-day neurological improvement, readmission, reoperation, or complications.

Conclusion: Compared with patients treated with a single-level ACDF for unilateral cervical radiculopathy, endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy can achieve a similar safety profile, pain relief, and neurological recovery at considerably less cost. These findings may help patients and surgeons revisit offering the posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy utilizing endoscopic techniques.

Clinical relevance: Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy offers comparable safety, pain relief, and neurological recovery to traditional methods but at a significantly lower cost.

Level of evidence: 3:

背景:颈椎病是一种脊柱疾病,经常需要通过颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)或后路椎板切除/椎间盘切除术进行手术减压。虽然内窥镜后椎板切除术/椎间盘切除术越来越受欢迎,但尽管其随机长期疗效与 ACDF 相当,对其经济影响的研究仍然不足。在一组接受 ACDF 与内窥镜颈椎后路椎板切除术/椎间盘切除术的患者中,我们试图比较手术的总费用,同时确认同等的安全性和围手术期结果:我们对2018年至2023年间接受ACDF或内窥镜颈椎椎板切除术的单侧颈椎根病变患者进行了单中心回顾性队列研究。主要结果包括初始手术疗程的总护理成本(非收费或报销)。围手术期变量和神经功能恢复情况均有记录。多变量分析检测了年龄、体重指数、种族、性别、保险类型、手术时间和住院时间:共进行了 38 例 ACDF 和 17 例内窥镜椎板切除/椎间盘切除手术。除2例双层内窥镜减压手术外,所有患者均接受了单层手术。除ACDF组患者年龄较小(46.8 ± 9.4 vs 57.6 ± 10.3,P = 0.002)和吸烟者较多(18.4% vs 11.8%,P = 0.043)外,基线特征和症状持续时间均无差异。在多变量分析中,ACDF组的手术治疗实际住院费用明显更高(平均值±95% CI;27782美元±2011美元 vs1010103美元±720美元,P<0.001),原因是ACDF方法(β=17723美元,P<0.001)。在敏感性分析中,与内窥镜椎板切除术相比,ACDF始终没有成本效益,内窥镜失败率需要达到64%才能实现成本平衡。ACDF 的手术时间(167.7 ± 22.0 分钟 vs 142.7 ± 27.4 分钟,P < 0.001)和住院时间(1.1 ± 0.5 天 vs 0.1 ± 0.2 天,P < 0.001)明显更长。在90天神经功能改善、再入院、再次手术或并发症方面没有发现明显差异:结论:与采用单水平 ACDF 治疗单侧颈椎病的患者相比,内窥镜颈椎后路椎板切除术/椎间盘切除术可实现相似的安全性、疼痛缓解和神经功能恢复,且费用更低。这些发现可能有助于患者和外科医生重新考虑利用内窥镜技术进行颈椎后椎板切除术/椎间盘切除术:临床相关性:内窥镜颈椎后椎板切除术/椎间盘切除术的安全性、疼痛缓解和神经功能恢复与传统方法相当,但费用明显更低:3:
{"title":"Revisiting the Posterior Approach for Cervical Radiculopathy Utilizing Endoscopic Techniques: A Favorable Short-Term Outcome and Cost Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.","authors":"Campbell Liles, Hani Chanbour, Alexander T Lyons, Emma Ye, Omar Zakieh, Robert J Dambrino, Iyan Younus, Soren Jonzzon, Richard A Berkman, Julian G Lugo-Pico, Amir M Abtahi, Byron F Stephens, Scott L Zuckerman, Raymond J Gardocki","doi":"10.14444/8629","DOIUrl":"10.14444/8629","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical radiculopathy is a spine ailment frequently requiring surgical decompression via anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior foraminotomy/discectomy. While endoscopic posterior foraminotomy/discectomy is gaining popularity, its financial impact remains understudied despite equivalent randomized long-term outcomes to ACDF. In a cohort of patients undergoing ACDF vs endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy, we sought to compare the total cost of the surgical episode while confirming an equivalent safety profile and perioperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy undergoing ACDF or endoscopic cervical foraminotomy between 2018 and 2023 was undertaken. Primary outcomes included the total cost of care for the initial surgical episode (not charges or reimbursement). Perioperative variables and neurological recovery were recorded. Multivariable analysis tested age, body mass index, race, gender, insurance type, operative time, and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 38 ACDF and 17 endoscopic foraminotomy/discectomy operations were performed. All patients underwent single-level surgery except for 2 two-level endoscopic decompressions. No differences were found in baseline characteristics and symptom length except for younger age (46.8 ± 9.4 vs 57.6 ± 10.3, <i>P</i> = 0.002) and more smokers (18.4% vs 11.8%, <i>P</i> = 0.043) in the ACDF group. Actual hospital costs for the episode of surgical care were markedly higher in the ACDF cohort (mean ±95% CI; $27,782 ± $2011 vs $10,103 ± $720, <i>P</i> < 0.001) driven by the ACDF approach (β = $17,723, <i>P</i> < 0.001) on multivariable analysis. On sensitivity analysis, ACDF was never cost-efficient compared with endoscopic foraminotomy, and endoscopic failure rates of 64% were required for break-even cost. ACDF was associated with significantly longer operative time (167.7 ± 22.0 vs 142.7 ± 27.4 minutes, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and length of stay (1.1 ± 0.5 vs 0.1 ± 0.2 days, <i>P</i> < 0.001). No significant difference was found regarding 90-day neurological improvement, readmission, reoperation, or complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with patients treated with a single-level ACDF for unilateral cervical radiculopathy, endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy can achieve a similar safety profile, pain relief, and neurological recovery at considerably less cost. These findings may help patients and surgeons revisit offering the posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy utilizing endoscopic techniques.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy offers comparable safety, pain relief, and neurological recovery to traditional methods but at a significantly lower cost.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"431-440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483441/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141983535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Outcomes of Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 1-Year Follow-Up. 俯卧位经腰椎椎间融合术的临床疗效:一年随访
IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.14444/8625
Hardeep Singh, Ian Wellington, Francine Zeng, Christopher Antonacci, Michael Mancini, Mirghani Mohamed, Joellen Broska, Scott Mallozzi, Isaac Moss

Background: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is commonly used to address various lumbar pathologies. LLIF using the prone transpsoas (PTP) approach has several potential advantages, allowing simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns of the spine. The aim of this study was to report the 1-year outcomes of LLIF via PTP.

Methods: This is a retrospective review of 97 consecutive patients who underwent LLIF via PTP. Radiographic parameters, including lumbar-lordosis, segmental-lordosis, anterior disc height, and posterior disc height, were measured on preoperative, initial-postoperative, and 1-year postoperative imaging. Patient-reported outcomes measures, including Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale (VAS), pain EQ5D, and postoperative complications, were reviewed.

Results: Ninety-seven consecutive patients underwent 161 levels of LLIF. Fifty-seven percent underwent 1-level LLIF, 30% 2-level LLIF, 6% 3-level LLIF, and 7% 4-level LLIF. The most common level was L4 to L5 (35%), followed by L3 to L4 (33%), L2 to L3 (21%), and L1 to L2 (11%). Significant improvements were noted at initial and 1-year postoperative periods in lumbar-lordosis (2° ± 10°, P = 0.049; 3° ± 9°, P = 0.005), segmental-lordosis (6° ± 5°, P < 0.001; 5° ± 5°, P < 0.001), anterior disc height (8 mm ± 4 mm, P < 0.001; 7 mm ± 4 mm, P < 0.001), and posterior disc height (3 mm ± 2 mm, P < 0.001; 3 mm ± 2 mm, P < 0.001). Significant improvements were seen in Oswestry Disability Index at 6 weeks (P = 0.002), 6 months (P < 0.001), and 1 year (P < 0.001) postoperatively; pain EQ5D at 6 weeks (P < 0.001), 6 months (P < 0.001), and 1 year (P < 0.001) postoperatively; and leg and back visual analog scale at 2 weeks (P < 0.001), 6 months (P < 0.001), and 1 year (P < 0.001) postoperatively. The average length of stay was 2.5 days, and the most common complications were ipsilateral hip flexor pain (46%), weakness (59%), and contralateral hip flexor pain (29%).

Conclusion: PTP is a novel way of performing LLIF. These 1-year data support that PTP is an effective, safe, and viable approach with similar patient-reported outcome measures and complications profiles as LLIF performed in the lateral decubitus position.

Level of evidence: 4:

背景:侧腰椎椎体间融合术(LLIF)常用于治疗各种腰椎疾病。采用俯卧位转体肌(PTP)方法进行 LLIF 有几个潜在的优势,可以同时进入脊柱的前柱和后柱。本研究旨在报告通过 PTP 进行 LLIF 的 1 年疗效:这是一项回顾性研究,共收集了 97 例通过 PTP 进行 LLIF 的连续患者的资料。在术前、术后初期和术后 1 年的影像学检查中测量了包括腰椎畸形、节段性畸形、椎间盘前部高度和椎间盘后部高度在内的影像学参数。患者报告的结果指标包括 Oswestry 失能指数、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、疼痛 EQ5D 和术后并发症:结果:97名患者连续接受了161级LLIF手术。57%的患者接受了1级LLIF,30%接受了2级LLIF,6%接受了3级LLIF,7%接受了4级LLIF。最常见的水平是 L4 到 L5(35%),其次是 L3 到 L4(33%)、L2 到 L3(21%)和 L1 到 L2(11%)。腰椎畸形(2° ± 10°,P = 0.049;3° ± 9°,P = 0.005)、节段性腰椎畸形(6° ± 5°,P < 0.001;5° ± 5°,P < 0.001)、椎间盘前部高度(8 mm ± 4 mm,P < 0.001;7 mm ± 4 mm,P < 0.001)和椎间盘后部高度(3 mm ± 2 mm,P < 0.001;3 mm ± 2 mm,P < 0.001)。术后6周(P = 0.002)、6个月(P < 0.001)和1年(P < 0.001)的Oswestry残疾指数;术后6周(P < 0.001)、6个月(P < 0.001)和1年(P < 0.001)的疼痛EQ5D;术后2周(P < 0.001)、6个月(P < 0.001)和1年(P < 0.001)的腿部和背部视觉模拟量表均有显著改善。平均住院时间为2.5天,最常见的并发症是同侧髋屈肌疼痛(46%)、无力(59%)和对侧髋屈肌疼痛(29%):结论:PTP 是进行 LLIF 的一种新方法。这些为期一年的数据支持 PTP 是一种有效、安全、可行的方法,其患者报告的结果指标和并发症情况与侧卧位进行的 LLIF 相似:4:
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 1-Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Hardeep Singh, Ian Wellington, Francine Zeng, Christopher Antonacci, Michael Mancini, Mirghani Mohamed, Joellen Broska, Scott Mallozzi, Isaac Moss","doi":"10.14444/8625","DOIUrl":"10.14444/8625","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is commonly used to address various lumbar pathologies. LLIF using the prone transpsoas (PTP) approach has several potential advantages, allowing simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns of the spine. The aim of this study was to report the 1-year outcomes of LLIF via PTP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective review of 97 consecutive patients who underwent LLIF via PTP. Radiographic parameters, including lumbar-lordosis, segmental-lordosis, anterior disc height, and posterior disc height, were measured on preoperative, initial-postoperative, and 1-year postoperative imaging. Patient-reported outcomes measures, including Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale (VAS), pain EQ5D, and postoperative complications, were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-seven consecutive patients underwent 161 levels of LLIF. Fifty-seven percent underwent 1-level LLIF, 30% 2-level LLIF, 6% 3-level LLIF, and 7% 4-level LLIF. The most common level was L4 to L5 (35%), followed by L3 to L4 (33%), L2 to L3 (21%), and L1 to L2 (11%). Significant improvements were noted at initial and 1-year postoperative periods in lumbar-lordosis (2° ± 10°, <i>P</i> = 0.049; 3° ± 9°, <i>P</i> = 0.005), segmental-lordosis (6° ± 5°, <i>P</i> < 0.001; 5° ± 5°, <i>P</i> < 0.001), anterior disc height (8 mm ± 4 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001; 7 mm ± 4 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and posterior disc height (3 mm ± 2 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001; 3 mm ± 2 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Significant improvements were seen in Oswestry Disability Index at 6 weeks (<i>P</i> = 0.002), 6 months (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and 1 year (<i>P</i> < 0.001) postoperatively; pain EQ5D at 6 weeks (<i>P</i> < 0.001), 6 months (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and 1 year (<i>P</i> < 0.001) postoperatively; and leg and back visual analog scale at 2 weeks (<i>P</i> < 0.001), 6 months (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and 1 year (<i>P</i> < 0.001) postoperatively. The average length of stay was 2.5 days, and the most common complications were ipsilateral hip flexor pain (46%), weakness (59%), and contralateral hip flexor pain (29%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PTP is a novel way of performing LLIF. These 1-year data support that PTP is an effective, safe, and viable approach with similar patient-reported outcome measures and complications profiles as LLIF performed in the lateral decubitus position.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"400-407"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483461/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141861171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of ISASS in Evolving the Spine Code Landscape: Lumbar Discogenic Pain Receives Specific ICD-10-CM Code. ISASS 在脊柱疾病代码发展中的作用:腰椎间盘源性疼痛获得特定的 ICD-10-CM 代码。
IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.14444/8622
Morgan P Lorio, Hansen A Yuan, Douglas P Beall, Jon E Block, Gunnar B J Andersson
{"title":"The Role of ISASS in Evolving the Spine Code Landscape: Lumbar Discogenic Pain Receives Specific ICD-10-CM Code.","authors":"Morgan P Lorio, Hansen A Yuan, Douglas P Beall, Jon E Block, Gunnar B J Andersson","doi":"10.14444/8622","DOIUrl":"10.14444/8622","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"353-354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483568/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141767545","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
International Journal of Spine Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1