首页 > 最新文献

Der Nervenarzt最新文献

英文 中文
[Assisted suicide : Attitudes and experiences of members of the DGPPN]. [协助自杀:DGPPN成员的态度和经历]。
IF 1.1 Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-23 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-022-01391-2
Michael Wassiliwizky, Gabriel Gerlinger, Katharina Domschke, Andreas Reif, Felix Bader, Thomas Pollmächer

Background and objective: After the Federal Constitutional Court overturned the ban on business-like assisted suicide in 2020, politicians, society and the medical profession are discussing legal protective measures to prevent abuse. This survey among members of the DGPPN is the first to record the attitudes and experiences regarding assisted suicide of psychiatrists and other mental health workers in Germany, as suicidality and assisted suicide are highly relevant topics for medicine and especially for psychiatry and psychotherapy.

Material and methods: The survey was conducted as an online survey with a specially created questionnaire and a DSGVO-compliant data protection concept and sent to a total of 9356 members. In addition to the descriptive analysis of the questionnaire, the free-text responses were subjected to an additional qualitative analysis. Finally, correlations between sociodemographic variables and relevant items were examined.

Results: A total of 2048 members participated in the survey (22%). Most participants (88%) considered a (new) legal regulation of assisted suicide to be necessary; the separation of counselling, assessment and execution of assisted suicide was mentioned most frequently (76%). The majority considered assisted suicide to be legitimate under certain circumstances when the suicide wish is freely made (72%), especially in cases of high suffering and near the end of life (67%). Age, gender, and religious beliefs were found to be significant influencing factors in several responses.

Conclusion: A large majority of the DGPPN members consider it necessary to find a legal regulation that prevents abuse of assisted suicide; however, while most participants did not consider assisted suicide to be legitimate or illegitimate in principle, but rather made this dependent on the specific circumstances of the suicide wish, more than half ruled out to assist with suicide. The results represent an important contribution to the political debates about legal protective measures.

背景和目的:在联邦宪法法院于2020年推翻了对商业协助自杀的禁令之后,政治家、社会和医学界正在讨论防止滥用的法律保护措施。在DGPPN成员中进行的这项调查首次记录了德国精神科医生和其他精神卫生工作者对协助自杀的态度和经历,因为自杀和协助自杀是医学,特别是精神病学和心理治疗领域高度相关的主题。材料和方法:该调查采用在线调查的方式进行,采用特别制作的问卷和符合dsgvo的数据保护概念,共发送给9356名成员。除了对问卷进行描述性分析外,还对自由文本回答进行了额外的定性分析。最后,研究了社会人口变量与相关项目之间的相关性。结果:共有2048名会员参与调查,占22%。大多数参与者(88%)认为有必要对协助自杀制定(新的)法律规定;咨询、评估和执行协助自杀的分离是最常被提及的(76%)。大多数人认为,在自由表达自杀意愿的情况下,协助自杀是合法的(72%),尤其是在极度痛苦和接近生命尽头的情况下(67%)。年龄、性别和宗教信仰在一些回答中被发现是重要的影响因素。结论:绝大多数DGPPN成员认为有必要制定法律法规来防止滥用辅助自杀;然而,虽然大多数参与者在原则上不认为协助自杀是合法的还是不合法的,但这取决于自杀愿望的具体情况,超过一半的人排除了协助自杀的可能性。研究结果对有关法律保护措施的政治辩论作出了重要贡献。
{"title":"[Assisted suicide : Attitudes and experiences of members of the DGPPN].","authors":"Michael Wassiliwizky,&nbsp;Gabriel Gerlinger,&nbsp;Katharina Domschke,&nbsp;Andreas Reif,&nbsp;Felix Bader,&nbsp;Thomas Pollmächer","doi":"10.1007/s00115-022-01391-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01391-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>After the Federal Constitutional Court overturned the ban on business-like assisted suicide in 2020, politicians, society and the medical profession are discussing legal protective measures to prevent abuse. This survey among members of the DGPPN is the first to record the attitudes and experiences regarding assisted suicide of psychiatrists and other mental health workers in Germany, as suicidality and assisted suicide are highly relevant topics for medicine and especially for psychiatry and psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The survey was conducted as an online survey with a specially created questionnaire and a DSGVO-compliant data protection concept and sent to a total of 9356 members. In addition to the descriptive analysis of the questionnaire, the free-text responses were subjected to an additional qualitative analysis. Finally, correlations between sociodemographic variables and relevant items were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2048 members participated in the survey (22%). Most participants (88%) considered a (new) legal regulation of assisted suicide to be necessary; the separation of counselling, assessment and execution of assisted suicide was mentioned most frequently (76%). The majority considered assisted suicide to be legitimate under certain circumstances when the suicide wish is freely made (72%), especially in cases of high suffering and near the end of life (67%). Age, gender, and religious beliefs were found to be significant influencing factors in several responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A large majority of the DGPPN members consider it necessary to find a legal regulation that prevents abuse of assisted suicide; however, while most participants did not consider assisted suicide to be legitimate or illegitimate in principle, but rather made this dependent on the specific circumstances of the suicide wish, more than half ruled out to assist with suicide. The results represent an important contribution to the political debates about legal protective measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":385288,"journal":{"name":"Der Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"1134-1142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33479387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
[Complex posttraumatic stress disorder in adults]. [成人的复杂创伤后应激障碍]。
IF 1.1 Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-17 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-022-01400-4
Ulrike Schmidt

The term "complex posttraumatic stress disorder" (cPTSD) appeared in the scientific literature 30 years ago and has now been included in a diagnostic catalogue for the first time, namely in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 11 (ICD-11) which was officially published at the beginning of 2022. This usually severely debilitating disorder often poses great challenges to treating physicians and psychotherapists in everyday clinical practice. Due to the much-debated overlap of cPTSD with borderline personality disorder (BPD), which is very high in cases of comorbidity of BPD and PTSD, cPTSD became embroiled in scientific discussions about the raison d'être of BPD in the new dimensional concept of personality disorders (PD) in the ICD-11. In addition to a detailed explanation of the diagnostic criteria of cPTSD and their differentiation from other mental disorders, particularly from PTSD, BPD and dissociative disorders, this article summarizes the historical development of the concept of cPTSD to date and the currently available treatment options. The same criteria apply to cPTSD in childhood and adolescence as in adulthood, but there are some special features that are not addressed in this article.

“复杂创伤后应激障碍”(cPTSD)一词30年前出现在科学文献中,现在首次被列入诊断目录,即2022年初正式出版的《国际疾病和相关健康问题统计分类11》(ICD-11)。在日常临床实践中,这种通常严重使人衰弱的疾病对治疗医生和心理治疗师提出了巨大的挑战。由于cPTSD与边缘性人格障碍(BPD)的重叠性备受争议,并且在BPD和PTSD的共病病例中非常高,因此在ICD-11中人格障碍(PD)的新维度概念中,cPTSD卷入了关于BPD的原因être的科学讨论。除了详细解释cPTSD的诊断标准及其与其他精神障碍的区别,特别是与创伤后应激障碍、BPD和分离性障碍的区别外,本文还总结了迄今为止cPTSD概念的历史发展以及目前可用的治疗方案。同样的标准适用于儿童期和青春期的cPTSD,但有一些特殊的特征不在本文中讨论。
{"title":"[Complex posttraumatic stress disorder in adults].","authors":"Ulrike Schmidt","doi":"10.1007/s00115-022-01400-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01400-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The term \"complex posttraumatic stress disorder\" (cPTSD) appeared in the scientific literature 30 years ago and has now been included in a diagnostic catalogue for the first time, namely in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 11 (ICD-11) which was officially published at the beginning of 2022. This usually severely debilitating disorder often poses great challenges to treating physicians and psychotherapists in everyday clinical practice. Due to the much-debated overlap of cPTSD with borderline personality disorder (BPD), which is very high in cases of comorbidity of BPD and PTSD, cPTSD became embroiled in scientific discussions about the raison d'être of BPD in the new dimensional concept of personality disorders (PD) in the ICD-11. In addition to a detailed explanation of the diagnostic criteria of cPTSD and their differentiation from other mental disorders, particularly from PTSD, BPD and dissociative disorders, this article summarizes the historical development of the concept of cPTSD to date and the currently available treatment options. The same criteria apply to cPTSD in childhood and adolescence as in adulthood, but there are some special features that are not addressed in this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":385288,"journal":{"name":"Der Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"1176-1184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33517631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
[Ewen D. Cameron: interactions between a pioneering psychiatrist and his professional as well as societal contexts]. [Ewen D. Cameron:精神科先驱与他的专业和社会环境的互动]。
IF 1.1 Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-21 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-022-01269-3
Hanfried Helmchen

As early as in the 1930s the psychiatrist Ewen Cameron laid the organisational fundamentals for the reform of psychiatric hospitals, introduced the open-door system, and founded the worldwide first psychiatric day-hospital in 1946. He also developed an automated psychotherapy, called "psychic driving"; furthermore, he bundled the somatic treatments of his time (scientific context) to a new form of treatment that he called "depatterning". His public image initially was determined by his charismatic personality, which received important honors; e.g. in 1961 he became the founding president of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA). Ten years after his death in 1967, when it became known that one of his research projects was covertly cofinanced by the CIA, he was stylized as the incarnation of brainwashing. The public concern with "brain-washing" and the mind control techniques of the CIA embedded in the societal atmosphere of the "cold war" with its conspiracy conjectures (societal context) changed fundamentally the posthumous image of Cameron. In a critical look back the fact remains that Cameron could have realized his research concepts in a clinical context that tolerated his research against the disease and emphasized this as opposed to the immediate suffering of the individual patient and, at the same time did not completely internalize the clear ethical regulations of the year 1948: the Nuremberg Codex, the World Medical Association's- Declaration of Geneva as well as the UN-Declaration of Human Rights. Furthermore, in his socially technical phantasies Cameron was in danger of leaving the socially oriented psychiatric care of mentally ill patients and of slipping down into a totalitarian ideology.

早在20世纪30年代,精神病学家Ewen Cameron就为精神病院的改革奠定了组织基础,引入了开放式制度,并于1946年建立了世界上第一家精神科日间医院。他还开发了一种自动心理疗法,称为“精神驾驶”;此外,他将当时的躯体疗法(科学背景)与一种他称之为“去模式”的新疗法捆绑在一起。他的公众形象最初是由他富有魅力的个性决定的,这获得了重要的荣誉;1961年,他成为世界精神病学协会(WPA)的创始主席。1967年,在他去世十年后,他的一个研究项目得到了中情局的秘密资助,这让他成为了洗脑的化身。公众对“洗脑”和中央情报局的精神控制技术的关注,嵌入了“冷战”的社会氛围及其阴谋猜想(社会背景),从根本上改变了卡梅伦死后的形象。在一个批判性的回顾中,事实仍然是卡梅伦可以在临床环境中实现他的研究概念,容忍他对疾病的研究,并强调这一点,而不是个体患者的直接痛苦,同时没有完全内化1948年明确的道德规范:纽伦堡法典,世界医学协会的日内瓦宣言以及联合国人权宣言。此外,在他的社会技术幻想中,卡梅伦面临着离开对精神病患者的社会导向的精神护理和滑入极权主义意识形态的危险。
{"title":"[Ewen D. Cameron: interactions between a pioneering psychiatrist and his professional as well as societal contexts].","authors":"Hanfried Helmchen","doi":"10.1007/s00115-022-01269-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01269-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As early as in the 1930s the psychiatrist Ewen Cameron laid the organisational fundamentals for the reform of psychiatric hospitals, introduced the open-door system, and founded the worldwide first psychiatric day-hospital in 1946. He also developed an automated psychotherapy, called \"psychic driving\"; furthermore, he bundled the somatic treatments of his time (scientific context) to a new form of treatment that he called \"depatterning\". His public image initially was determined by his charismatic personality, which received important honors; e.g. in 1961 he became the founding president of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA). Ten years after his death in 1967, when it became known that one of his research projects was covertly cofinanced by the CIA, he was stylized as the incarnation of brainwashing. The public concern with \"brain-washing\" and the mind control techniques of the CIA embedded in the societal atmosphere of the \"cold war\" with its conspiracy conjectures (societal context) changed fundamentally the posthumous image of Cameron. In a critical look back the fact remains that Cameron could have realized his research concepts in a clinical context that tolerated his research against the disease and emphasized this as opposed to the immediate suffering of the individual patient and, at the same time did not completely internalize the clear ethical regulations of the year 1948: the Nuremberg Codex, the World Medical Association's- Declaration of Geneva as well as the UN-Declaration of Human Rights. Furthermore, in his socially technical phantasies Cameron was in danger of leaving the socially oriented psychiatric care of mentally ill patients and of slipping down into a totalitarian ideology.</p>","PeriodicalId":385288,"journal":{"name":"Der Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"1170-1175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630179/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39942899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Monitoring of coercive measures and compulsory treatment in Germany]. [在德国监测强制措施和强制治疗]。
IF 1.1 Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-12 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-022-01349-4
Tilman Steinert, Sophie Hirsch, Erich Flammer

Epidemiological registers on the burden of disease and adverse events (deaths, serious side effects, etc.) play an important role in the management, evaluation, and improvement of healthcare treatment for the population. This also applies to coercive measures in the psychiatric healthcare system. Such registers only became feasible on a broad basis due to the availability of electronic medical records and steadily increasing computing capacities; however, in most German states, registers have not been implemented. Data protection problems must be taken into account in the collation of person-related data but can be solved by appropriate pseudonymization procedures taking the prerequisites of data parsimony into account. Extensive data are now available from the Baden-Wuerttemberg register for coercive measures, which has been in existence since 2015 and which enabled, for instance, evaluating the consequences of the changes to the law following the 2018 ruling of the Federal Constitutional Court on mechanical restraint and the consequences of the coronavirus pandemic. In the meantime, there are also state-wide data collections in some other German states; however, unlike in Baden-Wuerttemberg, these registers do not include measures under guardianship law. A nationwide register for coercive measures, compulsory treatment and involuntary detention has justifiably repeatedly been demanded for a long time. A major obstacle is the historically developed separation between the responsibility of the German states for the detention regulated by public law and the Federal State for the scope of application of the guardianship law.

关于疾病负担和不良事件(死亡、严重副作用等)的流行病学登记在管理、评估和改善人口保健治疗方面发挥着重要作用。这也适用于精神卫生保健系统的强制措施。由于电子医疗记录的出现和计算能力的稳步提高,这种登记册在广泛的基础上才变得可行;然而,在德国的大多数州,登记还没有实施。在整理个人相关数据时必须考虑数据保护问题,但可以通过适当的假名化程序解决,同时考虑到数据节约的先决条件。巴登-符腾堡州强制措施登记册现已提供了大量数据,该登记册自2015年以来一直存在,例如,可以评估2018年联邦宪法法院就机械约束和冠状病毒大流行的后果作出裁决后对法律进行修改的后果。与此同时,在德国其他一些州也有全州范围的数据收集;然而,与巴登-符腾堡州不同,这些登记不包括监护法规定的措施。长期以来,一再有理由要求在全国范围内登记强制性措施、强制治疗和非自愿拘留。一个主要障碍是历史上形成的德国各州对公法规定的拘留的责任与联邦国家对监护法适用范围的责任的分离。
{"title":"[Monitoring of coercive measures and compulsory treatment in Germany].","authors":"Tilman Steinert,&nbsp;Sophie Hirsch,&nbsp;Erich Flammer","doi":"10.1007/s00115-022-01349-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01349-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epidemiological registers on the burden of disease and adverse events (deaths, serious side effects, etc.) play an important role in the management, evaluation, and improvement of healthcare treatment for the population. This also applies to coercive measures in the psychiatric healthcare system. Such registers only became feasible on a broad basis due to the availability of electronic medical records and steadily increasing computing capacities; however, in most German states, registers have not been implemented. Data protection problems must be taken into account in the collation of person-related data but can be solved by appropriate pseudonymization procedures taking the prerequisites of data parsimony into account. Extensive data are now available from the Baden-Wuerttemberg register for coercive measures, which has been in existence since 2015 and which enabled, for instance, evaluating the consequences of the changes to the law following the 2018 ruling of the Federal Constitutional Court on mechanical restraint and the consequences of the coronavirus pandemic. In the meantime, there are also state-wide data collections in some other German states; however, unlike in Baden-Wuerttemberg, these registers do not include measures under guardianship law. A nationwide register for coercive measures, compulsory treatment and involuntary detention has justifiably repeatedly been demanded for a long time. A major obstacle is the historically developed separation between the responsibility of the German states for the detention regulated by public law and the Federal State for the scope of application of the guardianship law.</p>","PeriodicalId":385288,"journal":{"name":"Der Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"1105-1111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40608895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
[The reform of guardianship law]. [监护法改革]。
IF 1.1 Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-14 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-022-01355-6
Tanja Henking

The reform of the guardianship law has been decided! The reform will come into force on 1 January 2023. The content of the guardianship law will not be completely restructured. The tense relationship between the protection of the person against decisions not made on his or her own responsibility and the self-determination of the person will be consistently further considered and strengthened in favor of the self-determination of the person concerned. Supportive decision making, the consideration of a person's wishes, the abandonment of the term (and concept of) "well-being" as a measure for guardianship are some examples; however, the new law also sets boundaries in adhering to a person's wishes. Namely, if they are associated with the risk of significant harm to the person or his or her property. The article first presents the main objectives of the reform. Based on this, the focal points are the deletion of the word "well-being", the regulation of the proxy power of attorney and measures for greater consideration and better implementation of the principle of the necessity, which is central to the guardianship law. Critical comments are made on the newly introduced spousal representation law and its significance for the psychiatric practice. As a result, it can be stated that there will be hardly any significant changes in healthcare and even less so in the area of coercive measures. It remains to be seen whether the legislator's welcome concern to avoid guardianship through improved information and counselling on social rights will be achieved in practice. The same certainly applies to the strengthening of supported decision making, the idea of which is also to be welcomed but is still looking for a gold standard for practice.

监护法改革已定!这项改革将于2023年1月1日生效。监护法的内容不会完全重组。为了有利于有关人员的自决,将不断进一步审议和加强保护该人不受非由他或她自己负责作出的决定与该人的自决之间的紧张关系。支持性决策,考虑一个人的愿望,放弃“……”这个词(和概念)“幸福”作为监护的衡量标准是一些例子;然而,新法律也为遵守个人意愿设定了界限。也就是说,如果它们与对该人或其财产造成重大伤害的风险有关。文章首先提出了改革的主要目标。在此基础上,重点是删除“福祉”一词,对代理委托书的规范以及更多考虑和更好地执行必要性原则的措施,这是监护法的核心。对新出台的《配偶代理法》及其对精神病学实践的意义进行了批评。因此,可以说,在保健方面几乎不会有任何重大变化,在强制措施方面更不会有重大变化。立法者通过改进关于社会权利的信息和咨询来避免监护的令人欢迎的关切是否会在实践中实现,还有待观察。当然,这同样适用于加强支持性决策,这一想法也值得欢迎,但仍在寻找实践的黄金标准。
{"title":"[The reform of guardianship law].","authors":"Tanja Henking","doi":"10.1007/s00115-022-01355-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01355-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The reform of the guardianship law has been decided! The reform will come into force on 1 January 2023. The content of the guardianship law will not be completely restructured. The tense relationship between the protection of the person against decisions not made on his or her own responsibility and the self-determination of the person will be consistently further considered and strengthened in favor of the self-determination of the person concerned. Supportive decision making, the consideration of a person's wishes, the abandonment of the term (and concept of) \"well-being\" as a measure for guardianship are some examples; however, the new law also sets boundaries in adhering to a person's wishes. Namely, if they are associated with the risk of significant harm to the person or his or her property. The article first presents the main objectives of the reform. Based on this, the focal points are the deletion of the word \"well-being\", the regulation of the proxy power of attorney and measures for greater consideration and better implementation of the principle of the necessity, which is central to the guardianship law. Critical comments are made on the newly introduced spousal representation law and its significance for the psychiatric practice. As a result, it can be stated that there will be hardly any significant changes in healthcare and even less so in the area of coercive measures. It remains to be seen whether the legislator's welcome concern to avoid guardianship through improved information and counselling on social rights will be achieved in practice. The same certainly applies to the strengthening of supported decision making, the idea of which is also to be welcomed but is still looking for a gold standard for practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":385288,"journal":{"name":"Der Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"1125-1133"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630173/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40356547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[The combined supported decision making model : A template for an ethically justifiable implementation of Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in psychiatry]. [综合支持决策模型:联合国精神病学残疾人权利公约第12条在道德上合理实施的模板]。
IF 1.1 Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-19 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-022-01384-1
Matthé Scholten, Jakov Gather, Jochen Vollmann

Background: The interpretation of Article 12 of the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) by the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities led to a controversy over the implementation of the article in psychiatry.

Objective: How can Article 12 CRPD be implemented in psychiatry in an ethically justifiable way?

Material and method: An empirically and legally informed conceptual and ethical analysis was carried out.

Results: The suggested combined supported decision making model ensures the recognition of people with mental disorders as persons before the law, their equal treatment in the informed consent process and the provision of supported decision making. According to this model, coercive treatment can only be carried out in accordance with the will and preferences of the person and is subject to further conditions of proportionality and review by an independent body.

Conclusion: The combined supported decision making model makes an ethically justifiable implementation of Article 12 CRPD possible in psychiatry.

背景:联合国残疾人权利委员会对《联合国残疾人权利公约》(CRPD)第12条的解释引发了一场关于该条款在精神病学领域实施的争议。目的:《残疾人权利公约》第12条如何在精神病学中以合乎道德的方式实施?材料和方法:进行了经验和法律知情的概念和伦理分析。结果:所建议的联合支持决策模式确保了精神障碍患者作为法律面前的人得到承认,在知情同意过程中得到平等对待,并提供支持决策。根据这一模式,强制治疗只能按照当事人的意愿和偏好进行,并须遵守进一步的相称性条件和由独立机构进行审查。结论:联合支持决策模型使精神病学在道德上合理地实施第12条CRPD。
{"title":"[The combined supported decision making model : A template for an ethically justifiable implementation of Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in psychiatry].","authors":"Matthé Scholten,&nbsp;Jakov Gather,&nbsp;Jochen Vollmann","doi":"10.1007/s00115-022-01384-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01384-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The interpretation of Article 12 of the United Nations (UN) Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) by the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities led to a controversy over the implementation of the article in psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>How can Article 12 CRPD be implemented in psychiatry in an ethically justifiable way?</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>An empirically and legally informed conceptual and ethical analysis was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The suggested combined supported decision making model ensures the recognition of people with mental disorders as persons before the law, their equal treatment in the informed consent process and the provision of supported decision making. According to this model, coercive treatment can only be carried out in accordance with the will and preferences of the person and is subject to further conditions of proportionality and review by an independent body.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined supported decision making model makes an ethically justifiable implementation of Article 12 CRPD possible in psychiatry.</p>","PeriodicalId":385288,"journal":{"name":"Der Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"1093-1103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630234/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40369898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Free responsibility of the decision for an assisted suicide]. [协助自杀决定的自由责任]。
IF 1.1 Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-12 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-022-01386-z
Henning Saß, Clemens Cording

The verdict of the German Federal Constitutional Court on assisted suicide has led to lively debates in the medical world, in the German Federal Parliament and the civil society. In the conception of the German Federal Constitutional Court the determination of free responsibility is of central importance for a protection concept that aims to minimize an uncontrolled assistance to suicide; however, the forensic aspects of this task need to be substantiated. This article comments on this from a psychiatric aspect in order to include the perspective of our discipline in the progression of the discussion.

德国联邦宪法法院对协助自杀的判决在医学界、德国联邦议会和民间社会引发了激烈的辩论。在德国联邦宪法法院的概念中,自由责任的确定对于旨在尽量减少对自杀的不受控制的协助的保护概念至关重要;但是,这项任务的法医方面需要得到证实。本文从精神病学的角度对此进行评论,以便在讨论的进展中纳入本学科的观点。
{"title":"[Free responsibility of the decision for an assisted suicide].","authors":"Henning Saß,&nbsp;Clemens Cording","doi":"10.1007/s00115-022-01386-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01386-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The verdict of the German Federal Constitutional Court on assisted suicide has led to lively debates in the medical world, in the German Federal Parliament and the civil society. In the conception of the German Federal Constitutional Court the determination of free responsibility is of central importance for a protection concept that aims to minimize an uncontrolled assistance to suicide; however, the forensic aspects of this task need to be substantiated. This article comments on this from a psychiatric aspect in order to include the perspective of our discipline in the progression of the discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":385288,"journal":{"name":"Der Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"1150-1155"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630393/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33462542","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
[Suicide prevention in the context of assisted suicide]. [辅助自杀背景下的自杀预防]。
IF 1.1 Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-19 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-022-01382-3
Ute Lewitzka

The verdict of the German Federal Constitutional Court from 26 February 2020 made it clear that every person is granted the right to end his or her own life, provided it is the person's own free will. It is also within his or her rights to utilize assistance in doing so, if such assistance is offered. This freedom to end one's life and to utilize assistance is not limited to terminal illnesses or situations of unbearable suffering. However, the High Court has also demanded that lawmakers ensure the safety of vulnerable people by making certain that the decision for suicide is in fact made out of the person's own free will. This free decision-making capability can be substantially impaired by acute psychosocial stressors, by mental illnesses but also by third party influence. Therefore, a liberalization of assisted suicide must unconditionally be accompanied by a massive strengthening of suicide prevention measures, which clearly prioritize the help to live over the help to die. This article reviews the scientifically established methods for suicide prevention and makes demands to lawmakers to comprehensively implement such measures.

德国联邦宪法法院于2020年2月26日作出的判决明确指出,只要是出于个人的自由意志,每个人都有权结束自己的生命。他或她也有权在这样做时利用援助,如果这种援助是提供的。这种结束生命和利用援助的自由并不局限于绝症或无法忍受的痛苦。然而,高等法院也要求立法者确保弱势群体的安全,确保自杀的决定实际上是出于个人的自由意志。这种自由决策能力可因急性心理社会压力因素、精神疾病以及第三方影响而受到严重损害。因此,协助自杀的自由化必须无条件地伴随着大规模加强自杀预防措施,这显然优先考虑帮助生存而不是帮助死亡。本文回顾了科学建立的预防自杀的方法,并要求立法者全面实施这些措施。
{"title":"[Suicide prevention in the context of assisted suicide].","authors":"Ute Lewitzka","doi":"10.1007/s00115-022-01382-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01382-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The verdict of the German Federal Constitutional Court from 26 February 2020 made it clear that every person is granted the right to end his or her own life, provided it is the person's own free will. It is also within his or her rights to utilize assistance in doing so, if such assistance is offered. This freedom to end one's life and to utilize assistance is not limited to terminal illnesses or situations of unbearable suffering. However, the High Court has also demanded that lawmakers ensure the safety of vulnerable people by making certain that the decision for suicide is in fact made out of the person's own free will. This free decision-making capability can be substantially impaired by acute psychosocial stressors, by mental illnesses but also by third party influence. Therefore, a liberalization of assisted suicide must unconditionally be accompanied by a massive strengthening of suicide prevention measures, which clearly prioritize the help to live over the help to die. This article reviews the scientifically established methods for suicide prevention and makes demands to lawmakers to comprehensively implement such measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":385288,"journal":{"name":"Der Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"1112-1124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40368958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
[Erratum to: The combined supported decision making model : A template for an ethically justifiable implementation of Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in psychiatry]. [对综合支持决策模型的勘误:《联合国精神病学残疾人权利公约》第12条在道德上合理实施的模板]。
IF 1.1 Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-022-01401-3
Matthé Scholten, Jakov Gather, Jochen Vollmann
{"title":"[Erratum to: The combined supported decision making model : A template for an ethically justifiable implementation of Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in psychiatry].","authors":"Matthé Scholten,&nbsp;Jakov Gather,&nbsp;Jochen Vollmann","doi":"10.1007/s00115-022-01401-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01401-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":385288,"journal":{"name":"Der Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"1104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630247/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40570843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
[Is the number of psychotherapy sessions for patients with depression associated with the severity of the disease?] 抑郁症患者的心理治疗次数是否与疾病的严重程度有关?]
IF 1.1 Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-10 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-022-01374-3
Susanne Singer, Julian Blanck, Ida Scholz, Matthias Büttner, Lena Maier

Objective: This study investigated how the number of sessions for outpatient psychodynamic psychotherapy among patients with depressive disorders is associated with the severity of the disease.

Methods: From a random sample of 1000 applications for reimbursement of outpatient psychodynamic psychotherapy, we selected those in which a diagnosis of depression with a severity rating (ICD-10 F32 or F33) was coded. The association of levels of depression severity (mild, moderate, and severe) with the number of sessions requested and the number of sessions endorsed by the reviewer was investigated using Spearman's rank correlation. If the application was for a continuation of an ongoing therapy, the previous sessions were taken into account too.

Results: A total of 521 (52%) applications contained a diagnosis of F32 and/or F33. Out of these, 63 (12%) were coded as mild, 349 (67%) as moderate, and 50 (10%) as severe. There were 75 sessions applied for in patients with mild depression (median), 50 in patients with moderate depression, and 50 in patients with severe depression, whereby the range within each severity group was considerable (10 to 327 sessions) and the correlation was low (Rho -0.10). The median number of endorsed sessions was 74 in patients with mild depression, 50 in patients with moderate, and 50 in patients with severe depression. Here, too, the range was high (0 sessions to 327 sessions) and the association weak (Rho -0.11).

Discussion: There is no evidence that psychotherapists determine the necessary number of sessions solely based on the severity of the diagnosis.

目的:本研究探讨了抑郁症患者门诊心理动力治疗的次数与疾病严重程度的关系。方法:从1000个门诊心理动力治疗报销申请的随机样本中,我们选择了那些抑郁症诊断的严重程度评级(ICD-10 F32或F33)被编码。抑郁症严重程度(轻度、中度和重度)与要求的治疗次数和审稿人认可的治疗次数之间的关系采用Spearman等级相关法进行调查。如果申请是正在进行的治疗的延续,之前的疗程也会被考虑在内。结果:共有521例(52%)应用包含F32和/或F33的诊断。其中63例(12%)为轻度,349例(67%)为中度,50例(10%)为重度。轻度抑郁症患者有75个疗程(中位数),中度抑郁症患者有50个疗程,重度抑郁症患者有50个疗程,其中每个严重程度组的范围相当大(10到327个疗程),相关性很低(Rho -0.10)。在轻度抑郁症患者中,认可疗程的中位数为74次,中度抑郁症患者为50次,重度抑郁症患者为50次。在这里,范围也很高(0到327次),关联较弱(Rho -0.11)。讨论:没有证据表明心理治疗师仅仅根据诊断的严重程度来决定必要的治疗次数。
{"title":"[Is the number of psychotherapy sessions for patients with depression associated with the severity of the disease?]","authors":"Susanne Singer,&nbsp;Julian Blanck,&nbsp;Ida Scholz,&nbsp;Matthias Büttner,&nbsp;Lena Maier","doi":"10.1007/s00115-022-01374-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-022-01374-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated how the number of sessions for outpatient psychodynamic psychotherapy among patients with depressive disorders is associated with the severity of the disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From a random sample of 1000 applications for reimbursement of outpatient psychodynamic psychotherapy, we selected those in which a diagnosis of depression with a severity rating (ICD-10 F32 or F33) was coded. The association of levels of depression severity (mild, moderate, and severe) with the number of sessions requested and the number of sessions endorsed by the reviewer was investigated using Spearman's rank correlation. If the application was for a continuation of an ongoing therapy, the previous sessions were taken into account too.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 521 (52%) applications contained a diagnosis of F32 and/or F33. Out of these, 63 (12%) were coded as mild, 349 (67%) as moderate, and 50 (10%) as severe. There were 75 sessions applied for in patients with mild depression (median), 50 in patients with moderate depression, and 50 in patients with severe depression, whereby the range within each severity group was considerable (10 to 327 sessions) and the correlation was low (Rho -0.10). The median number of endorsed sessions was 74 in patients with mild depression, 50 in patients with moderate, and 50 in patients with severe depression. Here, too, the range was high (0 sessions to 327 sessions) and the association weak (Rho -0.11).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is no evidence that psychotherapists determine the necessary number of sessions solely based on the severity of the diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":385288,"journal":{"name":"Der Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":"1143-1149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9630213/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"40615087","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
期刊
Der Nervenarzt
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1