Pub Date : 2018-12-07eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1186/s12930-018-0049-7
K R Atukorala, S I Wickramasinghe, R D N Sumanasekera, K H Wickramasinghe
Background: Patients with diabetes on insulin therapy use sharps (e.g., needles) on a regular basis and a considerable proportion of them, within their home environments. These sharps and other bloodstained materials, if not disposed of appropriately has the potential to be a public health hazard.
Objective: Our objective was to explore the practices related to sharps disposal among patients with diabetes from North Colombo Teaching Hospital (CNTH), Ragama, Sri Lanka.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study on 158 patients with diabetes from the CNTH. Patients had to use sharps for the daily management of their disease for inclusion into the study group. Data were collected on sharps disposal practices using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Clinic records were also used as a secondary data source.
Results: Most patients, 153/158 (96.8%) used syringes to inject insulin. Forty-three patients (27%) involved others (e.g., family) when disposing of sharps. Used sharps were commonly disposed to the household garbage bin by 66 participants (41.7%). Other methods used for sharps disposal were: sharps container, toilet pit, household garbage dump and indiscriminate measures. Importantly most patients, 147 (93%) had received no information on how to dispose of sharps after usage.
Conclusion: Patients commonly used unsafe practices in home-based sharps disposal. These included disposing of in the household garbage bin, burning sharps in the household garbage dump and disposing of into the common garbage dump of the community. Being male and being > 60 years of age was associated with a higher dependence on family members for sharps disposal. Patient education and public resources for sharps handling can help improve this situation.
{"title":"Practices related to sharps disposal among diabetic patients in Sri Lanka.","authors":"K R Atukorala, S I Wickramasinghe, R D N Sumanasekera, K H Wickramasinghe","doi":"10.1186/s12930-018-0049-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0049-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with diabetes on insulin therapy use sharps (e.g., needles) on a regular basis and a considerable proportion of them, within their home environments. These sharps and other bloodstained materials, if not disposed of appropriately has the potential to be a public health hazard.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to explore the practices related to sharps disposal among patients with diabetes from North Colombo Teaching Hospital (CNTH), Ragama, Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study on 158 patients with diabetes from the CNTH. Patients had to use sharps for the daily management of their disease for inclusion into the study group. Data were collected on sharps disposal practices using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Clinic records were also used as a secondary data source.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most patients, 153/158 (96.8%) used syringes to inject insulin. Forty-three patients (27%) involved others (e.g., family) when disposing of sharps. Used sharps were commonly disposed to the household garbage bin by 66 participants (41.7%). Other methods used for sharps disposal were: sharps container, toilet pit, household garbage dump and indiscriminate measures. Importantly most patients, 147 (93%) had received no information on how to dispose of sharps after usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients commonly used unsafe practices in home-based sharps disposal. These included disposing of in the household garbage bin, burning sharps in the household garbage dump and disposing of into the common garbage dump of the community. Being male and being > 60 years of age was associated with a higher dependence on family members for sharps disposal. Patient education and public resources for sharps handling can help improve this situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-018-0049-7","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36776018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: As research in family medicine covers varied topics, multiple methodologies such as qualitative research (QR) and mixed methods research (MMR) are crucial. However, we do not know about the difference in the proportion of QR or MMR between Japan, the UK and the US. This knowledge is needed to shape future research within countries with developing primary care such as Japan and other Asian countries. This study aims to describe the use of QR and MMR in Japanese primary care and compare this to the UK and US; then to make informed recommendations for primary care research.
Methods: A repeated cross-sectional study (2012-2016) based on the abstracts submitted to the annual conferences of the Japanese Primary Care Association in Japan, the Royal College of General Practitioners in the UK, and the North American Primary Care Research Group in the US and other North American countries. The proportions of QR/MMR among all the posters and paper presentations for each of these three conferences were assessed. Also examined were trends and types of qualitative techniques for all three countries and participants/settings for Japan.
Results: There were 1080 abstracts for Japan, 575 for UK and 3614 for US conferences. QR/MMR proportions were 7.5%, 15.1% and 28.1%, respectively. Japan's proportion was lower than that of UK and US (p < 0.001). The proportion was increasing over time for the UK (p = 0.02). Steps for coding and analyses was most popular for Japan, thematic analysis for the UK and grounded theory for the US. Primary care doctors and hospitals were the commonest contexts for Japan.
Conclusions: QR and MMR were not as popular in primary care in Japan compared to the UK and the US, whereas their use was increasing in the UK. Approaches, participants and settings may differ among these countries. Education and promotion of QR/MMR and multi-disciplinary collaborations need to be recommended in Japan with developing primary care.
背景:由于家庭医学研究涉及多种主题,因此定性研究(QR)和混合方法研究(MMR)等多种方法至关重要。但是,我们不知道日本、英国和美国的QR或MMR的比例有什么不同。这方面的知识需要在初级保健发展中国家(如日本和其他亚洲国家)内塑造未来的研究。本研究旨在描述QR和MMR在日本初级保健中的使用,并将其与英国和美国进行比较;然后为初级保健研究提出明智的建议。方法:基于日本初级保健协会(Japanese Primary Care Association)、英国皇家全科医师学院(Royal College of General Practitioners)、美国和其他北美国家的北美初级保健研究小组(North American Primary Care Research Group)年度会议上提交的摘要,进行重复横断面研究(2012-2016)。评估了这三次会议的所有海报和论文中QR/MMR的比例。还审查了所有三个国家的趋势和定性技术类型以及日本的参与者/环境。结果:日本会议有1080篇,英国会议有575篇,美国会议有3614篇。QR/MMR比例分别为7.5%、15.1%和28.1%。结论:与英国和美国相比,QR和MMR在日本的初级保健中并不普及,而它们在英国的使用正在增加。这些国家的方法、参与者和环境可能有所不同。在日本发展初级保健时,需要建议开展教育和推广QR/MMR以及多学科合作。
{"title":"An analysis of qualitative and mixed methods abstracts from Japanese, UK and US primary care conferences.","authors":"Makoto Kaneko, Takuya Aoki, Ryuichi Ohta, Machiko Inoue, Rakesh N Modi","doi":"10.1186/s12930-018-0048-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0048-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As research in family medicine covers varied topics, multiple methodologies such as qualitative research (QR) and mixed methods research (MMR) are crucial. However, we do not know about the difference in the proportion of QR or MMR between Japan, the UK and the US. This knowledge is needed to shape future research within countries with developing primary care such as Japan and other Asian countries. This study aims to describe the use of QR and MMR in Japanese primary care and compare this to the UK and US; then to make informed recommendations for primary care research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A repeated cross-sectional study (2012-2016) based on the abstracts submitted to the annual conferences of the Japanese Primary Care Association in Japan, the Royal College of General Practitioners in the UK, and the North American Primary Care Research Group in the US and other North American countries. The proportions of QR/MMR among all the posters and paper presentations for each of these three conferences were assessed. Also examined were trends and types of qualitative techniques for all three countries and participants/settings for Japan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1080 abstracts for Japan, 575 for UK and 3614 for US conferences. QR/MMR proportions were 7.5%, 15.1% and 28.1%, respectively. Japan's proportion was lower than that of UK and US (p < 0.001). The proportion was increasing over time for the UK (p = 0.02). Steps for coding and analyses was most popular for Japan, thematic analysis for the UK and grounded theory for the US. Primary care doctors and hospitals were the commonest contexts for Japan.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QR and MMR were not as popular in primary care in Japan compared to the UK and the US, whereas their use was increasing in the UK. Approaches, participants and settings may differ among these countries. Education and promotion of QR/MMR and multi-disciplinary collaborations need to be recommended in Japan with developing primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-018-0048-8","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36719687","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-11-13eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1186/s12930-018-0047-9
Fitriana Murriya Ekawati, Mora Claramita, Wahyudi Istiono, Hari Kusnanto, Adi Heru Sutomo
Background: To be recognized as a primary care physician (PCP), an Indonesian general practitioner (GP) has to follow a formal postgraduate training in primary care. However, 4 years since the regulation was published, the progress of the training is slow. There is a need to deeply investigate the doctors' perspectives, particularly to explore factors associated with their willingness to follow this training.
Aim: This study aims to explore the GPs' views and perspectives related to the formal postgraduate training in primary care that may influence their enrolment in PCP program.
Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with a topic guide. The study took place in Yogyakarta from January to December 2016. The participants were GPs practicing in Yogyakarta primary care clinics who were recruited using purposive-maximum variation sample design. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis approach.
Results: Nineteen GPs participants were involved in this study. Three major themes were identified, namely unfamiliarity, resistance, and positivism. Almost all the GP participants were unfamiliar with the primary care training program. They were also pessimistic if the training could change the health service in the country while it lacked resources and infrastructures. However, exposure to the training brought positive insights that it could improve the doctors' knowledge and skills in primary care practice.
Discussion: The government intention to establish PCP training is currently on the right tract. However, information dissemination and more supports in primary care are also essential.
{"title":"The Indonesian general practitioners' perspectives on formal postgraduate training in primary care.","authors":"Fitriana Murriya Ekawati, Mora Claramita, Wahyudi Istiono, Hari Kusnanto, Adi Heru Sutomo","doi":"10.1186/s12930-018-0047-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0047-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To be recognized as a primary care physician (PCP), an Indonesian general practitioner (GP) has to follow a formal postgraduate training in primary care. However, 4 years since the regulation was published, the progress of the training is slow. There is a need to deeply investigate the doctors' perspectives, particularly to explore factors associated with their willingness to follow this training.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to explore the GPs' views and perspectives related to the formal postgraduate training in primary care that may influence their enrolment in PCP program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with a topic guide. The study took place in Yogyakarta from January to December 2016. The participants were GPs practicing in Yogyakarta primary care clinics who were recruited using purposive-maximum variation sample design. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen GPs participants were involved in this study. Three major themes were identified, namely unfamiliarity, resistance, and positivism. Almost all the GP participants were unfamiliar with the primary care training program. They were also pessimistic if the training could change the health service in the country while it lacked resources and infrastructures. However, exposure to the training brought positive insights that it could improve the doctors' knowledge and skills in primary care practice.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The government intention to establish PCP training is currently on the right tract. However, information dissemination and more supports in primary care are also essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-018-0047-9","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36713362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-09-03eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1186/s12930-018-0046-x
Apichai Wattanapisit, Udomsak Saengow
Background: A universal health coverage policy was implemented in Thailand in 2002 and led to an increase in accessibility to, and equity of, healthcare services. The Thai government and academics have focused on the large-scale aspects, including effectiveness and impacts, of universal health coverage over one decade. Here, we aimed to identify patients' perspectives on hospital visits under universal health coverage.
Methods: A qualitative study was carried out in four public hospitals in rural Thailand. We collected data through focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs). The semi-structured interview guide was designed to elicit perspectives on hospital visits among participants covered by the Universal Coverage Scheme, Social Security Scheme or Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. Data were transcribed and analysed using a thematic approach.
Results: Twenty-nine participants (mean age, 56.76 ± 16.65 years) participated in five FGDs and one IDI. The emerging themes and sub-themes were identified. Factors influencing decisions to visit hospitals were free healthcare services, perception of serious illness, the need for special tests, and continuity of care. Long waiting times were barriers to hospital visits. Employees, who could not leave their work during office hours, could not access some services such as health check-ups. From the viewpoint of participants, public hospitals provided quality and equitable healthcare services. Nevertheless, shared decision making for treatment plans was not common.
Conclusions: The factors and barriers to utilisation of healthcare services provide exploratory data to understand the healthcare-seeking behaviours of patients. Perceptions towards free services under universal health coverage are positive, but participation in decision making is rare. Future studies should focus on finding ways to balance the needs and barriers to hospital visits and to introduce the concept of shared decision making to both doctors and patients.
{"title":"Patients' perspectives regarding hospital visits in the universal health coverage system of Thailand: a qualitative study.","authors":"Apichai Wattanapisit, Udomsak Saengow","doi":"10.1186/s12930-018-0046-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0046-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A universal health coverage policy was implemented in Thailand in 2002 and led to an increase in accessibility to, and equity of, healthcare services. The Thai government and academics have focused on the large-scale aspects, including effectiveness and impacts, of universal health coverage over one decade. Here, we aimed to identify patients' perspectives on hospital visits under universal health coverage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was carried out in four public hospitals in rural Thailand. We collected data through focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs). The semi-structured interview guide was designed to elicit perspectives on hospital visits among participants covered by the Universal Coverage Scheme, Social Security Scheme or Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme. Data were transcribed and analysed using a thematic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine participants (mean age, 56.76 ± 16.65 years) participated in five FGDs and one IDI. The emerging themes and sub-themes were identified. Factors influencing decisions to visit hospitals were free healthcare services, perception of serious illness, the need for special tests, and continuity of care. Long waiting times were barriers to hospital visits. Employees, who could not leave their work during office hours, could not access some services such as health check-ups. From the viewpoint of participants, public hospitals provided quality and equitable healthcare services. Nevertheless, shared decision making for treatment plans was not common.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The factors and barriers to utilisation of healthcare services provide exploratory data to understand the healthcare-seeking behaviours of patients. Perceptions towards free services under universal health coverage are positive, but participation in decision making is rare. Future studies should focus on finding ways to balance the needs and barriers to hospital visits and to introduce the concept of shared decision making to both doctors and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-018-0046-x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36463122","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-07-27eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1186/s12930-018-0045-y
Ichsan Ichsan, Nur Wahyuniati, Ryan McKee, Louella Lobo, Karla Lancaster, Lynda Redwood-Campbell
Background: Conducting university-based research is important for informing primary care, especially in lower- and middle- income countries (LMICs) such as Indonesia. Syiah Kuala University (SKU), the largest educational institution in Aceh province, Indonesia, is actively establishing itself as a leader in research innovation; however, this effort has not yet demonstrated optimum results. Understanding faculty members' perceptions of how research is conducted in this setting is crucial for the design and implementation of successful and sustainable research strategies to increase the quantity and quality of primary care research conducted at LMIC universities. The objective of this study was to identify current attitudes, barriers and enablers/facilitators towards primary care research participation and implementation in this higher education institution.
Methods: A descriptive-interpretive qualitative study was conducted. 29 participants, representing 90% of all faculty members providing primary care, were included. A mixed-methods approach was used, combining the use of a participant survey with 10 focus group discussions. Participants were encouraged to complete the survey in either English or Bahasa Indonesia. All of the focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed and translated into English. Thematic content analysis of these transcripts was carried out.
Results: The majority of participants agreed that SKU has set research as a priority, as it is one of the three pillars of higher education, mandatory in all Indonesian higher education institutions. This research identified many barriers in conducting research, i.e. weak research policy, lack of research funding and infrastructure, complicated research bureaucracy and administrative process, as well as time constraints for conducting research relative to other duties. Participants expressed that personal motivation was a very important enabler/facilitator for increasing research activities. In order to improve research productivity, the majority of participants suggested that having local awards and formal recognition, having the opportunity to partner with local business and communities, provision of incentives, and having access to a research help-desk would be beneficial.
Conclusions: Generally, participants showed a supportive and positive attitude towards research, and provided examples of how to improve research productivity in the Asian university context.
{"title":"Attitudes, barriers, and enablers towards conducting primary care research in Banda Aceh, Indonesia: a qualitative research study.","authors":"Ichsan Ichsan, Nur Wahyuniati, Ryan McKee, Louella Lobo, Karla Lancaster, Lynda Redwood-Campbell","doi":"10.1186/s12930-018-0045-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0045-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conducting university-based research is important for informing primary care, especially in lower- and middle- income countries (LMICs) such as Indonesia. Syiah Kuala University (SKU), the largest educational institution in Aceh province, Indonesia, is actively establishing itself as a leader in research innovation; however, this effort has not yet demonstrated optimum results. Understanding faculty members' perceptions of how research is conducted in this setting is crucial for the design and implementation of successful and sustainable research strategies to increase the quantity and quality of primary care research conducted at LMIC universities. The objective of this study was to identify current attitudes, barriers and enablers/facilitators towards primary care research participation and implementation in this higher education institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive-interpretive qualitative study was conducted. 29 participants, representing 90% of all faculty members providing primary care, were included. A mixed-methods approach was used, combining the use of a participant survey with 10 focus group discussions. Participants were encouraged to complete the survey in either English or Bahasa Indonesia. All of the focus group discussions were recorded, transcribed and translated into English. Thematic content analysis of these transcripts was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of participants agreed that SKU has set research as a priority, as it is one of the three pillars of higher education, mandatory in all Indonesian higher education institutions. This research identified many barriers in conducting research, i.e. weak research policy, lack of research funding and infrastructure, complicated research bureaucracy and administrative process, as well as time constraints for conducting research relative to other duties. Participants expressed that personal motivation was a very important enabler/facilitator for increasing research activities. In order to improve research productivity, the majority of participants suggested that having local awards and formal recognition, having the opportunity to partner with local business and communities, provision of incentives, and having access to a research help-desk would be beneficial.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generally, participants showed a supportive and positive attitude towards research, and provided examples of how to improve research productivity in the Asian university context.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-018-0045-y","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36360020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: In 2015 in Japan 12.7% of people die at home. Since the government has no policy to increase the number of hospital beds, at-home deaths should inevitably increase in the near future. Previous researches regarding expected place of death have focused on end-of-life patients. The aim of this study is to clarify the percentage and factors of senior people who expect at-home deaths whether they are end-of-life or not.
Methods: Using cross-sectional questionnaire survey data which had been taken by a research group with the support from Tama City Medical Association (Tokyo) in 2014, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify associations among factors. The dependent variable was the expected site of death and other factors were set as independent variables.
Results: Of 1781 respondents, 46.5% expected at-home deaths. Data from 1133 people were analyzed and 46.5% of those wanted at-home deaths. Factors significantly associated with expectation of at-home death were men, stand-alone houses for dwelling, expectation to continue life in Tama city, twosome life with the spouse, healthiness, and economic challenge.
Conclusion: Percentage of those who expected at-home deaths was much higher than the latest percentage of at-home deaths. Some factors associated with expectation of at-home deaths in this study have never been discussed.
{"title":"Population-based survey regarding factors contributing to expectation for death at home.","authors":"Tomoya Tsuchida, Hirotaka Onishi, Yoshifumi Ono, Ako Machino, Fumiko Inoue, Manabu Kamegai","doi":"10.1186/s12930-018-0044-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0044-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2015 in Japan 12.7% of people die at home. Since the government has no policy to increase the number of hospital beds, at-home deaths should inevitably increase in the near future. Previous researches regarding expected place of death have focused on end-of-life patients. The aim of this study is to clarify the percentage and factors of senior people who expect at-home deaths whether they are end-of-life or not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using cross-sectional questionnaire survey data which had been taken by a research group with the support from Tama City Medical Association (Tokyo) in 2014, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify associations among factors. The dependent variable was the expected site of death and other factors were set as independent variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1781 respondents, 46.5% expected at-home deaths. Data from 1133 people were analyzed and 46.5% of those wanted at-home deaths. Factors significantly associated with expectation of at-home death were men, stand-alone houses for dwelling, expectation to continue life in Tama city, twosome life with the spouse, healthiness, and economic challenge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Percentage of those who expected at-home deaths was much higher than the latest percentage of at-home deaths. Some factors associated with expectation of at-home deaths in this study have never been discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-018-0044-z","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36313993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Detecting and treating dementia at an early stage are important. Although the Revised Hasegawa Dementia Scale (HDS-R) is commonly used to detect dementia, it takes about 10 min to complete. In contrast, the 1-min animal test (OMAT) takes only 1 min to complete and may be a helpful screening test for general practitioners in deciding whether to proceed with administering further diagnostic tests such as the HDS-R. We sought to examine the relationship between the OMAT and HDS-R scores, and determine the cut-off OMAT score that balanced the sensitivity and specificity in identifying HDS-R-positive patients.
Methods: A total of 122 consecutive patients with diabetes who visited the outpatient clinic at the Fujiidera Municipal Hospital were enrolled. The patients underwent the OMAT and HDS-R on the same day. Tests were conducted in a single-blinded manner. The relationship between the OMAT and HDS-R scores was examined using Spearman's rank correlation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the optimal cut-off score of OMAT that will determine whether to proceed with further diagnostic tests.
Results: A strong positive correlation between the OMAT and HDS-R scores was observed (r = 0.70). The sensitivity and specificity of OMAT using cut-off scores of 12/13, 13/14, and 14/15 for HDS-R-positive patients were 0.87 and 0.66, 1.00 and 0.51, and 1.00 and 0.40, respectively among all the subjects. Similar results were obtained in a subgroup of subjects aged ≥ 65 years.
Conclusions: A cut-off score of 13/14 on the OMAT balanced the sensitivity closest to 1.00 and allowed for the highest specificity for the HDS-R not only among all the patients, but also among just the patients aged ≥ 65 years. The OMAT may be an optimal screening test to determine whether to proceed with further diagnosis using HDS-R.Trial registration UMIN UMIN000025260. This study is retrospectively registered on December 13th, 2016.
{"title":"The 1-min animal test as a mental status screening examination in patients with diabetes.","authors":"Shigeki Kinuhata, Yasuhiko Takemoto, Mariko Senda, Shiho Nakai, Erika Tsumura, Tatsuyuki Otoshi, Sadahiko Hiratani, Kazuo Fukumoto, Hiroki Namikawa, Yoshihiro Tochino, Mina Morimura, Taichi Shuto, Sadahiko Uchimoto","doi":"10.1186/s12930-018-0043-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0043-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Detecting and treating dementia at an early stage are important. Although the Revised Hasegawa Dementia Scale (HDS-R) is commonly used to detect dementia, it takes about 10 min to complete. In contrast, the 1-min animal test (OMAT) takes only 1 min to complete and may be a helpful screening test for general practitioners in deciding whether to proceed with administering further diagnostic tests such as the HDS-R. We sought to examine the relationship between the OMAT and HDS-R scores, and determine the cut-off OMAT score that balanced the sensitivity and specificity in identifying HDS-R-positive patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 122 consecutive patients with diabetes who visited the outpatient clinic at the Fujiidera Municipal Hospital were enrolled. The patients underwent the OMAT and HDS-R on the same day. Tests were conducted in a single-blinded manner. The relationship between the OMAT and HDS-R scores was examined using Spearman's rank correlation. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the optimal cut-off score of OMAT that will determine whether to proceed with further diagnostic tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A strong positive correlation between the OMAT and HDS-R scores was observed (r = 0.70). The sensitivity and specificity of OMAT using cut-off scores of 12/13, 13/14, and 14/15 for HDS-R-positive patients were 0.87 and 0.66, 1.00 and 0.51, and 1.00 and 0.40, respectively among all the subjects. Similar results were obtained in a subgroup of subjects aged ≥ 65 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A cut-off score of 13/14 on the OMAT balanced the sensitivity closest to 1.00 and allowed for the highest specificity for the HDS-R not only among all the patients, but also among just the patients aged ≥ 65 years. The OMAT may be an optimal screening test to determine whether to proceed with further diagnosis using HDS-R.<i>Trial registration</i> UMIN UMIN000025260. This study is retrospectively registered on December 13th, 2016.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-018-0043-0","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36246668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-05-30eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1186/s12930-018-0041-2
Latifa Mohammad Baynouna Al Ketbi, Sana Zein Al Deen
Background: The efficacy of implementing practices based on the best evidence is determined by the limitations and preparedness of the structure and processes of the healthcare system as well as healthcare professionals' (HCP) levels of knowledge and acceptance. Facilitating implementation of such practices also partly depends on HCPs' attitudes.
Method: We investigate the attitudes and beliefs of four groups of physicians in the United Arab Emirates on clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), with a focus on applying revisions to these CPGs in a different setting than the one in which they were developed, and where no locally developed guidelines exist.
Results: CPGs were the main source of information for revisions. We identified a rising concern in the applicability of the recommendations, which persists due to a lack of locally developed revisions. Other concerns include the pressures of practice management changes and of coping with the rapid development in resources and the growing demand on its use. Some international and government-endorsed CPGs were still accepted as being the best candidates for adoption.
Conclusions: This group welcomes evidence-based practice and is supported by electronic medical records, structured care programmes, and ongoing quality monitoring. Barriers and facilitators of clinical practice guidelines are discussed and thoughts on effective implementation strategies are considered.
{"title":"The attitudes and beliefs of general practitioners towards clinical practice guidelines: a qualitative study in Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.","authors":"Latifa Mohammad Baynouna Al Ketbi, Sana Zein Al Deen","doi":"10.1186/s12930-018-0041-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0041-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of implementing practices based on the best evidence is determined by the limitations and preparedness of the structure and processes of the healthcare system as well as healthcare professionals' (HCP) levels of knowledge and acceptance. Facilitating implementation of such practices also partly depends on HCPs' attitudes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We investigate the attitudes and beliefs of four groups of physicians in the United Arab Emirates on clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), with a focus on applying revisions to these CPGs in a different setting than the one in which they were developed, and where no locally developed guidelines exist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CPGs were the main source of information for revisions. We identified a rising concern in the applicability of the recommendations, which persists due to a lack of locally developed revisions. Other concerns include the pressures of practice management changes and of coping with the rapid development in resources and the growing demand on its use. Some international and government-endorsed CPGs were still accepted as being the best candidates for adoption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This group welcomes evidence-based practice and is supported by electronic medical records, structured care programmes, and ongoing quality monitoring. Barriers and facilitators of clinical practice guidelines are discussed and thoughts on effective implementation strategies are considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-018-0041-2","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36181625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-05-29eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1186/s12930-018-0042-1
Mora Claramita, Fitriana Murriya Ekawati, Aghnaa Gayatri, Wahyudi Istiono, Adi Heru Sutomo, Hari Kusnanto, Mark Alan Graber
Background: General practitioners (GPs) in Indonesia are medical doctors without formal graduate professional training. Only recently, graduate general practice (GP) is being introduced to Indonesia. Therefore, it is important to provide a framework to prepare a residency training in general practice part of which is to equip GP graduate doctors to deliver person-centered, comprehensive care in general practice. Experiential learning theory is often used to design workplace-based learning in medical education. The aim of this study was to evaluate a graduate professional training program in general practice based on the 'experiential learning' framework.
Methods: This was a pre-posttest study. The participants were 159 GPs who have been practicing for a minimum of 5 years, without formal graduate professional training, from two urban cities of Indonesia (Yogyakarta and Jakarta). A 40-week curriculum called the 'weekly clinical updates on primary care medicine' (WCU) was designed, where GPs met with clinical consultants weekly in a class. The participant's knowledge was assessed with pre-posttests involving 100 written clinical cases in line with each topic in the curriculum. Learning continued with a series of group discussions to gain reflection to reinforce learning.
Results: Participants' knowledge regarding clinical problems in general practice was moderately increased (p < 0.05) after the training from a mean score of 50.64-72.77 (Yogyakarta's doctors) and 39.37-51.81 (Jakarta's doctors). Participants were able to reflect on the principles of general practice patient-care. Participants reported satisfaction during the course, and expressed a desire for a formal residency training.
Conclusions: A graduate educational framework for GP based on the 'experiential learning' framework in this study could be used to prepare a graduate GP training; it is effective at increasing the comprehension of general practitioners towards better primary care practice.
{"title":"Preparatory graduate professional training in general practice by using the 'experiential learning' framework.","authors":"Mora Claramita, Fitriana Murriya Ekawati, Aghnaa Gayatri, Wahyudi Istiono, Adi Heru Sutomo, Hari Kusnanto, Mark Alan Graber","doi":"10.1186/s12930-018-0042-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0042-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practitioners (GPs) in Indonesia are medical doctors without formal graduate professional training. Only recently, graduate general practice (GP) is being introduced to Indonesia. Therefore, it is important to provide a framework to prepare a residency training in general practice part of which is to equip GP graduate doctors to deliver person-centered, comprehensive care in general practice. Experiential learning theory is often used to design workplace-based learning in medical education. The aim of this study was to evaluate a graduate professional training program in general practice based on the 'experiential learning' framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a pre-posttest study. The participants were 159 GPs who have been practicing for a minimum of 5 years, without formal graduate professional training, from two urban cities of Indonesia (Yogyakarta and Jakarta). A 40-week curriculum called the 'weekly clinical updates on primary care medicine' (WCU) was designed, where GPs met with clinical consultants weekly in a class. The participant's knowledge was assessed with pre-posttests involving 100 written clinical cases in line with each topic in the curriculum. Learning continued with a series of group discussions to gain reflection to reinforce learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants' knowledge regarding clinical problems in general practice was moderately increased (<i>p </i>< 0.05) after the training from a mean score of 50.64-72.77 (Yogyakarta's doctors) and 39.37-51.81 (Jakarta's doctors). Participants were able to reflect on the principles of general practice patient-care. Participants reported satisfaction during the course, and expressed a desire for a formal residency training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A graduate educational framework for GP based on the 'experiential learning' framework in this study could be used to prepare a graduate GP training; it is effective at increasing the comprehension of general practitioners towards better primary care practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-018-0042-1","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"36181624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2018-02-08eCollection Date: 2018-01-01DOI: 10.1186/s12930-018-0040-3
Dana Lo, Florence Wu, Mark Chan, Rodney Chu, Donald Li
Background: Numerous studies around the world has already suggested that burnout among doctors is a global phenomenon. However, studies for burnout in doctors are relatively limited in Chinese communities when compared to the West. As risk factors, barriers to intervention and strategies combatting burnout in different parts of the world can vary a lot due to different social culture and healthcare system, study with a focus at doctors in China from a cultural perspective is a worthful endeavor.
Methods: Systematic searches of databases were conducted for papers published in peer-reviewed journals from 2006 to 2016. Selection criteria included practicing doctors in Mainland China and publications written in English or Chinese. Keywords searched including "burnout", "doctors" and "China" in 3 electronic databases has been undergone. Traditional understanding of "work attitude" and "doctors' humanity" from ancient Chinese literature has also been retrieved.
Results: Eleven full papers, including 9302 participants, were included in this review. The overall prevalence of burnout symptoms among doctors in China ranged from 66.5 to 87.8%. The review suggested that negative impact of burnout include association with anxiety symptoms and low job satisfaction at the individual doctors' level, and prone to committing medical mistakes affecting patient safety and higher turnover intention at the society/organizational level. Burnout was higher among doctors who worked over 40 h/week, working in tertiary hospitals, on younger age group within the profession (at age 30-40), and with negative individual perception to work and life.
Conclusions and implications: The overall prevalence and adverse impact of burnout among doctors in China echo with the findings from Western studies. Young doctors and doctors working in tertiary hospitals are more at risk of burnout, probably related to shift of social culture related to the loss of medical humanities and a weak primary healthcare system. Potential strategies of managing burnout in Chinese doctors should therefore take consideration from the Chinese cultural perspective, with renaissance of medical humanities and strengthening the primary healthcare system in China.
{"title":"A systematic review of burnout among doctors in China: a cultural perspective.","authors":"Dana Lo, Florence Wu, Mark Chan, Rodney Chu, Donald Li","doi":"10.1186/s12930-018-0040-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0040-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous studies around the world has already suggested that burnout among doctors is a global phenomenon. However, studies for burnout in doctors are relatively limited in Chinese communities when compared to the West. As risk factors, barriers to intervention and strategies combatting burnout in different parts of the world can vary a lot due to different social culture and healthcare system, study with a focus at doctors in China from a cultural perspective is a worthful endeavor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches of databases were conducted for papers published in peer-reviewed journals from 2006 to 2016. Selection criteria included practicing doctors in Mainland China and publications written in English or Chinese. Keywords searched including \"burnout\", \"doctors\" and \"China\" in 3 electronic databases has been undergone. Traditional understanding of \"work attitude\" and \"doctors' humanity\" from ancient Chinese literature has also been retrieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven full papers, including 9302 participants, were included in this review. The overall prevalence of burnout symptoms among doctors in China ranged from 66.5 to 87.8%. The review suggested that negative impact of burnout include association with anxiety symptoms and low job satisfaction at the individual doctors' level, and prone to committing medical mistakes affecting patient safety and higher turnover intention at the society/organizational level. Burnout was higher among doctors who worked over 40 h/week, working in tertiary hospitals, on younger age group within the profession (at age 30-40), and with negative individual perception to work and life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>The overall prevalence and adverse impact of burnout among doctors in China echo with the findings from Western studies. Young doctors and doctors working in tertiary hospitals are more at risk of burnout, probably related to shift of social culture related to the loss of medical humanities and a weak primary healthcare system. Potential strategies of managing burnout in Chinese doctors should therefore take consideration from the Chinese cultural perspective, with renaissance of medical humanities and strengthening the primary healthcare system in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":39050,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Family Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12930-018-0040-3","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35836563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}