Pub Date : 2023-02-01Epub Date: 2022-05-30DOI: 10.1177/17511437221103692
John Cafferkey, Andrew Ferguson, Julia Grahamslaw, Katherine Oatey, John Norrie, Nazir Lone, Timothy Walsh, Daniel Horner, Andy Appelboam, Peter Hall, Richard Skipworth, Derek Bell, Kevin Rooney, Manu Shankar-Hari, Alasdair Corfield, Alasdair Gray
Background: Patients presenting with suspected sepsis to secondary care often require fluid resuscitation to correct hypovolaemia and/or septic shock. Existing evidence signals, but does not demonstrate, a benefit for regimes including albumin over balanced crystalloid alone. However, interventions may be started too late, missing a critical resuscitation window.
Methods: ABC Sepsis is a currently recruiting randomised controlled feasibility trial comparing 5% human albumin solution (HAS) with balanced crystalloid for fluid resuscitation in patients with suspected sepsis. This multicentre trial is recruiting adult patients within 12 hours of presentation to secondary care with suspected community acquired sepsis, with a National Early Warning Score ≥5, who require intravenous fluid resuscitation. Participants are randomised to 5% HAS or balanced crystalloid as the sole resuscitation fluid for the first 6 hours.
Objectives: Primary objectives are feasibility of recruitment to the study and 30-day mortality between groups. Secondary objectives include in-hospital and 90-day mortality, adherence to trial protocol, quality of life measurement and secondary care costs.
Discussion: This trial aims to determine the feasibility of conducting a trial to address the current uncertainty around optimal fluid resuscitation of patients with suspected sepsis. Understanding the feasibility of delivering a definitive study will be dependent on how the study team are able to negotiate clinician choice, Emergency Department pressures and participant acceptability, as well as whether any clinical signal of benefit is detected.
{"title":"Albumin versus balanced crystalloid for resuscitation in the treatment of sepsis: A protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study, \"ABC-Sepsis\".","authors":"John Cafferkey, Andrew Ferguson, Julia Grahamslaw, Katherine Oatey, John Norrie, Nazir Lone, Timothy Walsh, Daniel Horner, Andy Appelboam, Peter Hall, Richard Skipworth, Derek Bell, Kevin Rooney, Manu Shankar-Hari, Alasdair Corfield, Alasdair Gray","doi":"10.1177/17511437221103692","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17511437221103692","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients presenting with suspected sepsis to secondary care often require fluid resuscitation to correct hypovolaemia and/or septic shock. Existing evidence signals, but does not demonstrate, a benefit for regimes including albumin over balanced crystalloid alone. However, interventions may be started too late, missing a critical resuscitation window.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ABC Sepsis is a currently recruiting randomised controlled feasibility trial comparing 5% human albumin solution (HAS) with balanced crystalloid for fluid resuscitation in patients with suspected sepsis. This multicentre trial is recruiting adult patients within 12 hours of presentation to secondary care with suspected community acquired sepsis, with a National Early Warning Score ≥5, who require intravenous fluid resuscitation. Participants are randomised to 5% HAS or balanced crystalloid as the sole resuscitation fluid for the first 6 hours.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Primary objectives are feasibility of recruitment to the study and 30-day mortality between groups. Secondary objectives include in-hospital and 90-day mortality, adherence to trial protocol, quality of life measurement and secondary care costs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This trial aims to determine the feasibility of conducting a trial to address the current uncertainty around optimal fluid resuscitation of patients with suspected sepsis. Understanding the feasibility of delivering a definitive study will be dependent on how the study team are able to negotiate clinician choice, Emergency Department pressures and participant acceptability, as well as whether any clinical signal of benefit is detected.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"78-84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157259/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10812316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1177/17511437221100332
Paul Twose, Ella Terblanche, Una Jones, James Bruce, Penelope Firshman, Julie Highfield, Gemma Jones, Judith Merriweather, Vicky Newey, Helen Newman, Claire Rock, Sarah Wallace
Introduction: National guidelines suggest recommended staffing levels for therapies. The aim of this study was to capture information on existing staffing levels, roles and responsibilities and service structures.
Methods: An observational study using online surveys distributed to 245 critical care units across the United Kingdom (UK). Surveys consisted of a generic and five profession specific surveys.
Results: Eight hundred sixty-two responses were received from 197 critical care units across the UK. Of those that responded, over 96% of units had input from dietetics, physiotherapy and SLT. Whereas only 59.1% and 48.1% had an OT or psychology service respectively. Units with ring fenced services had improved therapist to patient ratios.
Discussion: There is significant variation in access to therapists for patients admitted to critical care in the UK, with many services not having services for core therapies such as psychology and OT. Where services do exist, they fall below the recommended guidance.
{"title":"Therapy professionals in critical care: A UK wide workforce survey.","authors":"Paul Twose, Ella Terblanche, Una Jones, James Bruce, Penelope Firshman, Julie Highfield, Gemma Jones, Judith Merriweather, Vicky Newey, Helen Newman, Claire Rock, Sarah Wallace","doi":"10.1177/17511437221100332","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437221100332","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>National guidelines suggest recommended staffing levels for therapies. The aim of this study was to capture information on existing staffing levels, roles and responsibilities and service structures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study using online surveys distributed to 245 critical care units across the United Kingdom (UK). Surveys consisted of a generic and five profession specific surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight hundred sixty-two responses were received from 197 critical care units across the UK. Of those that responded, over 96% of units had input from dietetics, physiotherapy and SLT. Whereas only 59.1% and 48.1% had an OT or psychology service respectively. Units with ring fenced services had improved therapist to patient ratios.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There is significant variation in access to therapists for patients admitted to critical care in the UK, with many services not having services for core therapies such as psychology and OT. Where services do exist, they fall below the recommended guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"24-31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975796/pdf/10.1177_17511437221100332.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9411580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1177/17511437221095336
Stephen J Taylor, Kaylee Sayer, Paul White
Background: Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a major cause of undernutrition that can be overcome using nasointestinal (NI) feeding, but tube placement often fails. We analyse which techniques enable successful NI tube placement.
Methods: Efficacy of tube technique was determined at each of six anatomical points: Nose, nasopharynx-oesophagus, stomach-upper and -lower, duodenum part-1 and intestine.
Results: In 913 first NI tube placements, significant associations with tube advancement were found in the pharynx (head tilt, jaw thrust, laryngoscopy), stomach_upper (air insufflation, 10 cm or 20-30 cm flexible tube tip ± reverse Seldinger manoeuvre), stomach_lower (air insufflation, possibly flexible tip and wire stiffener) and duodenum part-1 and beyond part-2 (flexible tip and combinations of micro-advance, slack removal, wire stiffener or prokinetic drugs).
Conclusion: This is the first study to show what techniques are associated with tube advancement and the alimentary tract level they are specific to.
{"title":"Nasointestinal tube placement: Techniques that increase success.","authors":"Stephen J Taylor, Kaylee Sayer, Paul White","doi":"10.1177/17511437221095336","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437221095336","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a major cause of undernutrition that can be overcome using nasointestinal (NI) feeding, but tube placement often fails. We analyse which techniques enable successful NI tube placement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Efficacy of tube technique was determined at each of six anatomical points: Nose, nasopharynx-oesophagus, stomach-upper and -lower, duodenum part-1 and intestine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 913 first NI tube placements, significant associations with tube advancement were found in the pharynx (head tilt, jaw thrust, laryngoscopy), stomach_upper (air insufflation, 10 cm or 20-30 cm flexible tube tip ± reverse Seldinger manoeuvre), stomach_lower (air insufflation, possibly flexible tip and wire stiffener) and duodenum part-1 and beyond part-2 (flexible tip and combinations of micro-advance, slack removal, wire stiffener or prokinetic drugs).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study to show what techniques are associated with tube advancement and the alimentary tract level they are specific to.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"62-70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975804/pdf/10.1177_17511437221095336.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9411581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1177/17511437221099791
Meredith T Yeung, Nicholas K Tan, Gideon Z Lee, Yuemian Gao, Chun Ju Tan, Clement C Yan
Purpose: Prolonged bed rest and immobility in the intensive care units (ICU) increase the risk of ICU-acquired weakness (ICUAW) and other complications. Mobilisation has been shown to improve patient outcomes but may be limited by the perceived barriers of healthcare professionals to mobilisation. The Patient Mobilisation Attitudes and Beliefs Survey for the ICU (PMABS-ICU) was adapted to assess perceived barriers to mobility in the Singapore context (PMABS-ICU-SG).
Methods: The 26-item PMABS-ICU-SG was disseminated to doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, and respiratory therapists working in ICU of various hospitals across Singapore. Overall and subscale (knowledge, attitude, and behaviour) scores were obtained and compared with the clinical roles, years of work experience, and type of ICU of the survey respondents.
Results: A total of 86 responses were received. Of these, 37.2% (32/86) were physiotherapists, 27.9% (24/86) were respiratory therapists, 24.4% (21/86) were nurses and 10.5% (9/86) were doctors. Physiotherapists had significantly lower mean barrier scores in overall and all subscales compared to nurses (p < 0.001), respiratory therapists (p < 0.001), and doctors (p = 0.001). A poor correlation (r = 0.079, p < 0.05) was found between years of experience and the overall barrier score. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall barriers score between types of ICU (χ2(2) = 4.720, p = 0.317).
Conclusion: In Singapore, physiotherapists had significantly lower perceived barriers to mobilisation compared to the other three professions. Years of experience and type of ICU had no significance in relation to barriers to mobilisation.
目的:重症监护病房(ICU)长期卧床和不活动增加了ICU获得性虚弱(ICUAW)和其他并发症的风险。动员已被证明可以改善患者的预后,但可能受到卫生保健专业人员对动员的感知障碍的限制。ICU患者移动态度和信念调查(PMABS-ICU)适用于评估新加坡环境下移动的感知障碍(PMABS-ICU- sg)。方法:向新加坡各医院ICU的医生、护士、物理治疗师和呼吸治疗师发放共26项的PMABS-ICU-SG。获得总体和子量表(知识、态度和行为)得分,并与调查对象的临床角色、工作经验年数和ICU类型进行比较。结果:共收到86份问卷。其中,物理治疗师37.2%(32/86),呼吸治疗师27.9%(24/86),护士24.4%(21/86),医生10.5%(9/86)。与护士(p < 0.001)、呼吸治疗师(p < 0.001)和医生(p = 0.001)相比,物理治疗师在总体和所有亚量表上的平均屏障评分显著低于护士(p < 0.001)。经验年数与障碍总分的相关性较差(r = 0.079, p < 0.05)。不同ICU类型间障碍总分比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2(2) = 4.720, p = 0.317)。结论:在新加坡,与其他三个职业相比,物理治疗师在动员方面的感知障碍明显较低。经验年限和ICU类型与动员障碍无关。
{"title":"Perceived barriers to mobility in the intensive care units of Singapore: The Patient Mobilisation Attitudes and Beliefs Survey for the intensive care units.","authors":"Meredith T Yeung, Nicholas K Tan, Gideon Z Lee, Yuemian Gao, Chun Ju Tan, Clement C Yan","doi":"10.1177/17511437221099791","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437221099791","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prolonged bed rest and immobility in the intensive care units (ICU) increase the risk of ICU-acquired weakness (ICUAW) and other complications. Mobilisation has been shown to improve patient outcomes but may be limited by the perceived barriers of healthcare professionals to mobilisation. The Patient Mobilisation Attitudes and Beliefs Survey for the ICU (PMABS-ICU) was adapted to assess perceived barriers to mobility in the Singapore context (PMABS-ICU-SG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 26-item PMABS-ICU-SG was disseminated to doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, and respiratory therapists working in ICU of various hospitals across Singapore. Overall and subscale (knowledge, attitude, and behaviour) scores were obtained and compared with the clinical roles, years of work experience, and type of ICU of the survey respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 86 responses were received. Of these, 37.2% (32/86) were physiotherapists, 27.9% (24/86) were respiratory therapists, 24.4% (21/86) were nurses and 10.5% (9/86) were doctors. Physiotherapists had significantly lower mean barrier scores in overall and all subscales compared to nurses (p < 0.001), respiratory therapists (p < 0.001), and doctors (p = 0.001). A poor correlation (r = 0.079, p < 0.05) was found between years of experience and the overall barrier score. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall barriers score between types of ICU (χ2(2) = 4.720, p = 0.317).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Singapore, physiotherapists had significantly lower perceived barriers to mobilisation compared to the other three professions. Years of experience and type of ICU had no significance in relation to barriers to mobilisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"32-39"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975807/pdf/10.1177_17511437221099791.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9099735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01Epub Date: 2022-06-01DOI: 10.1177/17511437221105774
Adam B Brayne, William Jones, Adrienne Lee, Catherine Chatfield-Ball, Duncan Kaye, Matthew Ball, Gorki Sacher, Patrick Morgan
Aim: In the United Kingdom (UK), 600 deaths per annum are attributable to drowning. Despite this there is scarce critical care data on drowning patients globally. We describe drowning cases admitted to critical care units with a focus on functional outcomes.
Materials and methods: Medical records for critical care admissions following a drowning event were retrospectively reviewed across six hospitals in Southwest England for cases presenting in the period between 2009 and 2020. Data was collected according to the Utstein international consensus guidelines on drowning.
Results: Forty-nine patients were included, 36 males and 13 females, including seven children. Median submersion duration was 2.5 min 20 cases were in cardiac arrest when rescued. At discharge 22 patients had preserved functional status, 10 patients had a reduced functional status. 17 patients died in hospital.
Conclusion: Admission to critical care following drowning is uncommon and associated with high rates of mortality and poor functional outcomes. We find that 31% of those who survived a drowning event subsequently required an increased level of assistance with their activities of daily living.
{"title":"Critical care drowning admissions in Southwest England 2009-2020, a retrospective study.","authors":"Adam B Brayne, William Jones, Adrienne Lee, Catherine Chatfield-Ball, Duncan Kaye, Matthew Ball, Gorki Sacher, Patrick Morgan","doi":"10.1177/17511437221105774","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17511437221105774","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In the United Kingdom (UK), 600 deaths per annum are attributable to drowning. Despite this there is scarce critical care data on drowning patients globally. We describe drowning cases admitted to critical care units with a focus on functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Medical records for critical care admissions following a drowning event were retrospectively reviewed across six hospitals in Southwest England for cases presenting in the period between 2009 and 2020. Data was collected according to the Utstein international consensus guidelines on drowning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine patients were included, 36 males and 13 females, including seven children. Median submersion duration was 2.5 min 20 cases were in cardiac arrest when rescued. At discharge 22 patients had preserved functional status, 10 patients had a reduced functional status. 17 patients died in hospital.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Admission to critical care following drowning is uncommon and associated with high rates of mortality and poor functional outcomes. We find that 31% of those who survived a drowning event subsequently required an increased level of assistance with their activities of daily living.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"47-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975799/pdf/10.1177_17511437221105774.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9411582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1177/17511437221113239
Matthew Edmondson, Layla Guscoth, Julie Highfield, Fiona E Kelly
Intensive Care Unit staff deal with potentially traumatic cases throughout their careers. We designed and implemented a 'Team Immediate Meet' (TIM) tool, a communication aid designed to facilitate a two-minute 'hot debrief' after a critical event, provide the team with information about the normal reaction to such an event and signpost staff to strategies to help support their colleagues (and themselves). We describe our TIM tool awareness campaign, quality improvement project and subsequent feedback from staff who reported that the tool would be useful for navigating the aftermath of potentially traumatic events and could be transferable to other ICUs.
{"title":"Team Immediate Meet tool to help intensive care staff: Staff perception of an updated version and preliminary feedback following implementation.","authors":"Matthew Edmondson, Layla Guscoth, Julie Highfield, Fiona E Kelly","doi":"10.1177/17511437221113239","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437221113239","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intensive Care Unit staff deal with potentially traumatic cases throughout their careers. We designed and implemented a 'Team Immediate Meet' (TIM) tool, a communication aid designed to facilitate a two-minute 'hot debrief' after a critical event, provide the team with information about the normal reaction to such an event and signpost staff to strategies to help support their colleagues (and themselves). We describe our TIM tool awareness campaign, quality improvement project and subsequent feedback from staff who reported that the tool would be useful for navigating the aftermath of potentially traumatic events and could be transferable to other ICUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"117-120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975809/pdf/10.1177_17511437221113239.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9411583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01Epub Date: 2022-05-04DOI: 10.1177/17511437221096287
Andy Georgiou, Nicholas Turner, Alfredo Serrano Ruiz, Harry Wadman, Emma Saunsbury, Stephen Laver, Rob Maybin
Background: This study aims to identify any effect of frailty in altering the risk of death or poor outcome already associated with receipt of organ support on ICU. It also aims to assess the performance of mortality prediction models in frail patients.
Methods: All admissions to a single ICU over 1-year were prospectively allocated a Clinical Frailty Score (CFS). Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the effect of frailty on death or poor outcome (death/discharge to a medical facility). Logistic regression analysis, area under the Receiver Operator Curve (AUROC) and Brier scores were used to investigate the ability of two mortality prediction models, ICNARC and APACHE II, to predict mortality in frail patients.
Results: Of 849 patients, 700 (82%) patients were not frail, and 149 (18%) were frail. Frailty was associated with a stepwise increase in the odds of death or poor outcome (OR for each point rise of CFS = 1.23 ([1.03-1.47]; p = .024) and 1.32 ([1.17-1.48]; p = <.001) respectively). Renal support conferred the greatest odds of death and poor outcome, followed by respiratory support, then cardiovascular support (which increased the odds of death but not poor outcome). Frailty did not modify the odds already associated with organ support. The mortality prediction models were not modified by frailty (AUROC p = .220 and .437 respectively). Inclusion of frailty into both models improved their accuracy.
Conclusions: Frailty was associated with increased odds of death and poor outcome, but did not modify the risk already associated with organ support. Inclusion of frailty improved mortality prediction models.
{"title":"The impact of frailty on death, discharge destination and modelling accuracy in patients receiving organ support on the intensive care unit.","authors":"Andy Georgiou, Nicholas Turner, Alfredo Serrano Ruiz, Harry Wadman, Emma Saunsbury, Stephen Laver, Rob Maybin","doi":"10.1177/17511437221096287","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17511437221096287","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to identify any effect of frailty in altering the risk of death or poor outcome already associated with receipt of organ support on ICU. It also aims to assess the performance of mortality prediction models in frail patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All admissions to a single ICU over 1-year were prospectively allocated a Clinical Frailty Score (CFS). Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the effect of frailty on death or poor outcome (death/discharge to a medical facility). Logistic regression analysis, area under the Receiver Operator Curve (AUROC) and Brier scores were used to investigate the ability of two mortality prediction models, ICNARC and APACHE II, to predict mortality in frail patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 849 patients, 700 (82%) patients were not frail, and 149 (18%) were frail. Frailty was associated with a stepwise increase in the odds of death or poor outcome (OR for each point rise of CFS = 1.23 ([1.03-1.47]; <i>p</i> = .024) and 1.32 ([1.17-1.48]; <i>p</i> = <.001) respectively). Renal support conferred the greatest odds of death and poor outcome, followed by respiratory support, then cardiovascular support (which increased the odds of death but not poor outcome). Frailty did not modify the odds already associated with organ support. The mortality prediction models were not modified by frailty (AUROC <i>p</i> = .220 and .437 respectively). Inclusion of frailty into both models improved their accuracy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty was associated with increased odds of death and poor outcome, but did not modify the risk already associated with organ support. Inclusion of frailty improved mortality prediction models.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"16-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975794/pdf/10.1177_17511437221096287.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9099736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1177/17511437221092685
Jody Ede, David Garry, Graham Barker, Owen Gustafson, Elizabeth King, Hannah Routley, Christopher Biggs, Cherry Lumley, Lyn Bennett, Stephanie Payne, Andrew Ellis, Clinton Green, Nathan Smith, Laura Vincent, Matthew Holdaway, Peter Watkinson
Background: The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted weaknesses in the National Health Service critical care provision including both capacity and infrastructure. Traditionally, healthcare workspaces have failed to fully incorporate Human-Centred Design principles resulting in environments that negatively affect the efficacy of task completion, patient safety and staff wellbeing. In the summer of 2020, we received funds for the urgent construction of a Covid-19 secure critical care facility. The aim of this project was to design a pandemic resilient facility centred around both staff and patient requirements and safety, within the available footprint.
Methods: We developed a simulation exercise, underpinned by Human-Centred Design principles, to evaluate intensive care designs through Build Mapping, Tasks Analysis and Qualitative data. Build Mapping involved taping out sections of the design and mocking up with equipment. Task Analysis and qualitative data were collected following task completion.
Results: 56 participants completed the build simulation exercise generating 141 design suggestions (69 task related, 56 patient and relative related, 16 staff related). Suggestions translated to 18 multilevel design improvements; five significant structural changes (Macro level) including wall moves and lift size change. Minor improvements were made at a Meso and Micro design level. Critical care design drivers identified included functional drivers (visibility, Covid-19 secure environment, workflow, and task efficiency) and behavioural drivers (learning and development, light, humanising intensive care and design consistency).
Conclusion: Success of clinical tasks, infection control, patient safety and staff/patient wellbeing are highly dependent on clinical environments. Primarily, we have improved clinical design by focusing on user requirements. Secondly, we developed a replicable approach to exploring healthcare build plans revealing significant design changes, that may have only been identified once built.
{"title":"Building a Covid-19 secure intensive care unit: A human-centred design approach.","authors":"Jody Ede, David Garry, Graham Barker, Owen Gustafson, Elizabeth King, Hannah Routley, Christopher Biggs, Cherry Lumley, Lyn Bennett, Stephanie Payne, Andrew Ellis, Clinton Green, Nathan Smith, Laura Vincent, Matthew Holdaway, Peter Watkinson","doi":"10.1177/17511437221092685","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437221092685","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted weaknesses in the National Health Service critical care provision including both capacity and infrastructure. Traditionally, healthcare workspaces have failed to fully incorporate Human-Centred Design principles resulting in environments that negatively affect the efficacy of task completion, patient safety and staff wellbeing. In the summer of 2020, we received funds for the urgent construction of a Covid-19 secure critical care facility. The aim of this project was to design a pandemic resilient facility centred around both staff and patient requirements and safety, within the available footprint.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a simulation exercise, underpinned by Human-Centred Design principles, to evaluate intensive care designs through Build Mapping, Tasks Analysis and Qualitative data. Build Mapping involved taping out sections of the design and mocking up with equipment. Task Analysis and qualitative data were collected following task completion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>56 participants completed the build simulation exercise generating 141 design suggestions (69 task related, 56 patient and relative related, 16 staff related). Suggestions translated to 18 multilevel design improvements; five significant structural changes (Macro level) including wall moves and lift size change. Minor improvements were made at a Meso and Micro design level. Critical care design drivers identified included functional drivers (visibility, Covid-19 secure environment, workflow, and task efficiency) and behavioural drivers (learning and development, light, humanising intensive care and design consistency).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Success of clinical tasks, infection control, patient safety and staff/patient wellbeing are highly dependent on clinical environments. Primarily, we have improved clinical design by focusing on user requirements. Secondly, we developed a replicable approach to exploring healthcare build plans revealing significant design changes, that may have only been identified once built.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"71-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9204129/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10812317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-02-01DOI: 10.1177/17511437231156999
{"title":"Thanks to reviewers.","authors":"","doi":"10.1177/17511437231156999","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437231156999","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9975795/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10828611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-11-01DOI: 10.1177/17511437211037928
Jasmin Kaur Pandhal, Veronika Van Der Wardt
Background: Delirium is a common complication in patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). Family members can help alleviate patient anxiety and may be able to aid in the management of delirium. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of former ICU patients and their families together, regarding the involvement of family in delirium management.
Method: Nine audio-recorded, semi-structured interviews took place with former ICU patients together with a family member. Participants were interviewed after their intensive care follow-up clinic appointment in an East Midlands hospital in England. Interviews were transcribed, coded and analysed using thematic analysis.
Results: Three themes were identified: 'understanding about delirium'; 'influencers of delirium management: family and healthcare professionals' and 'family-based delirium care'. Participants expressed that family have a valuable role to play in the management of delirium in the ICU. However, education and guidance is needed to support the family in how delirium can be managed and the current treatment options available. It is important for ICU staff to gain an understanding of the patient's life and personality to personalise delirium management to the needs of the patient and their family.
Conclusion: This study found that family presence and knowledge about the patient may be beneficial to delirium management in the ICU. Further research should investigate the effectiveness of the strategies and interventions to understand their influence on delirium management in ICU patients.
{"title":"Exploring perceptions regarding family-based delirium management in the intensive care unit.","authors":"Jasmin Kaur Pandhal, Veronika Van Der Wardt","doi":"10.1177/17511437211037928","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437211037928","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is a common complication in patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU). Family members can help alleviate patient anxiety and may be able to aid in the management of delirium. This study aimed to explore the perceptions of former ICU patients and their families together, regarding the involvement of family in delirium management.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Nine audio-recorded, semi-structured interviews took place with former ICU patients together with a family member. Participants were interviewed after their intensive care follow-up clinic appointment in an East Midlands hospital in England. Interviews were transcribed, coded and analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were identified: 'understanding about delirium'; 'influencers of delirium management: family and healthcare professionals' and 'family-based delirium care'. Participants expressed that family have a valuable role to play in the management of delirium in the ICU. However, education and guidance is needed to support the family in how delirium can be managed and the current treatment options available. It is important for ICU staff to gain an understanding of the patient's life and personality to personalise delirium management to the needs of the patient and their family.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that family presence and knowledge about the patient may be beneficial to delirium management in the ICU. Further research should investigate the effectiveness of the strategies and interventions to understand their influence on delirium management in ICU patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"23 4","pages":"447-452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9679907/pdf/10.1177_17511437211037928.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9243521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}