首页 > 最新文献

Journal of the Intensive Care Society最新文献

英文 中文
Early beta-blocker exposure and association with brain injury biomarkers following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A TRACK-TBI study. 早期-受体阻滞剂暴露与中重度创伤性脑损伤后脑损伤生物标志物的关联:一项TRACK-TBI研究
IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-06-29 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1177/17511437251349680
Pattrapun Wongsripuemtet, Tetsu Ohnuma, Nancy Temkin, Jason Barber, Jordan Komisarow, Geoffrey T Manley, Jordan Hatfield, Miriam Treggiari, Katharine Colton, Cina Sasannejad, Nophanan Chaikittisilpa, Ramesh Grandhi, Daniel T Laskowitz, Joseph P Mathew, Adrian Hernandez, Michael L James, Karthik Raghunathan, Joseph B Miller, Monica S Vavilala, Ben Goldstein, Vijay Krishnamoorthy

Background: Beta-blockers have been studied for potential benefits in traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed to investigate the association between early beta-blocker exposure and brain injury biomarkers following moderate-severe TBI.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Transforming Clinical Research and Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study. Patients ⩾ 17 years with moderate-severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-12) admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were included. Early beta-blocker exposure was defined as administration within the first 72 h of admission. The primary outcome was blood-based brain injury biomarker levels on day 3 post-injury. Biomarkers included glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), and the inflammatory biomarker C-reactive protein (CRP). Propensity-weighted models analyzed the association between beta-blocker exposure and biomarker levels.

Results: Among 450 patients, 31 (7%) received beta-blockers (BB+). The mean (SD) age of BB+ patients was 51.4 (16.2) years, compared to 39.5 (17.0) years for unexposed patients (BB-). BB+ group was associated with a decreased NSE level on day 3 (ratio = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.96, p = 0.026), although this was not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons (p = 0.13). For secondary outcomes, UCH-L1 levels increased on day 5 in the BB+ group (ratio = 1.62, 95% CI 1.12- 2.36, p = 0.011), but this was not significant after adjustment (p = 0.55). The NSE level on day 14 decreased in the BB+ group (ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.66, p < 0.001) and remained significant after adjustment (p = 0.005).

Conclusions: There was no association between early beta-blocker exposure and the primary outcome which was blood-based brain injury biomarker levels on day 3. In exploratory analysis, we found that early beta-blocker may associated with decreased NSE level on day 14. Due to the retrospective nature of the study and the use of propensity-weighted analysis to identify associations, direct clinical practice changes cannot be recommended. However, the significant association with NSE level warrants further investigation through prospective studies or randomized controlled trials to confirm the potential neuroprotective effect of early beta-blocker exposure on neuronal cellular injury.

背景:研究了β受体阻滞剂对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的潜在益处。本研究旨在探讨早期β受体阻滞剂暴露与中重度TBI后脑损伤生物标志物之间的关系。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用来自TBI临床研究和知识转化(TRACK-TBI)研究的数据。包括住进重症监护病房(ICU)的小于17岁的中重度TBI患者(格拉斯哥昏迷量表3-12)。早期受体阻滞剂暴露被定义为在入院前72小时内给药。主要终点是损伤后第3天基于血液的脑损伤生物标志物水平。生物标志物包括胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、泛素c端水解酶- l1 (UCH-L1)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、S100钙结合蛋白B (S100B)和炎症生物标志物c反应蛋白(CRP)。倾向加权模型分析了受体阻滞剂暴露与生物标志物水平之间的关系。结果:在450例患者中,31例(7%)接受了β受体阻滞剂(BB+)治疗。BB+患者的平均(SD)年龄为51.4(16.2)岁,未暴露患者(BB-)的平均(SD)年龄为39.5(17.0)岁。BB+组与第3天NSE水平下降相关(比值= 0.71,95% CI 0.52-0.96, p = 0.026),尽管在调整多重比较后这并不显著(p = 0.13)。对于次要结果,BB+组的UCH-L1水平在第5天升高(比值= 1.62,95% CI 1.12- 2.36, p = 0.011),但调整后无统计学意义(p = 0.55)。BB+组第14天NSE水平下降(比值0.45,95% CI 0.30-0.66, p p = 0.005)。结论:早期β受体阻滞剂暴露与第3天血基脑损伤生物标志物水平的主要结局之间没有关联。在探索性分析中,我们发现早期β受体阻滞剂可能与第14天NSE水平下降有关。由于该研究是回顾性的,并且使用倾向加权分析来确定相关性,因此不建议直接改变临床实践。然而,与NSE水平的显著相关性需要通过前瞻性研究或随机对照试验进一步研究,以证实早期β受体阻滞剂暴露对神经元细胞损伤的潜在神经保护作用。
{"title":"Early beta-blocker exposure and association with brain injury biomarkers following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: A TRACK-TBI study.","authors":"Pattrapun Wongsripuemtet, Tetsu Ohnuma, Nancy Temkin, Jason Barber, Jordan Komisarow, Geoffrey T Manley, Jordan Hatfield, Miriam Treggiari, Katharine Colton, Cina Sasannejad, Nophanan Chaikittisilpa, Ramesh Grandhi, Daniel T Laskowitz, Joseph P Mathew, Adrian Hernandez, Michael L James, Karthik Raghunathan, Joseph B Miller, Monica S Vavilala, Ben Goldstein, Vijay Krishnamoorthy","doi":"10.1177/17511437251349680","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17511437251349680","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Beta-blockers have been studied for potential benefits in traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed to investigate the association between early beta-blocker exposure and brain injury biomarkers following moderate-severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Transforming Clinical Research and Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study. Patients ⩾ 17 years with moderate-severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-12) admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) were included. Early beta-blocker exposure was defined as administration within the first 72 h of admission. The primary outcome was blood-based brain injury biomarker levels on day 3 post-injury. Biomarkers included glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), and the inflammatory biomarker C-reactive protein (CRP). Propensity-weighted models analyzed the association between beta-blocker exposure and biomarker levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 450 patients, 31 (7%) received beta-blockers (BB+). The mean (SD) age of BB+ patients was 51.4 (16.2) years, compared to 39.5 (17.0) years for unexposed patients (BB-). BB+ group was associated with a decreased NSE level on day 3 (ratio = 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.026), although this was not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons (<i>p</i> = 0.13). For secondary outcomes, UCH-L1 levels increased on day 5 in the BB+ group (ratio = 1.62, 95% CI 1.12- 2.36, <i>p</i> = 0.011), but this was not significant after adjustment (<i>p</i> = 0.55). The NSE level on day 14 decreased in the BB+ group (ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.66, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and remained significant after adjustment (<i>p</i> = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no association between early beta-blocker exposure and the primary outcome which was blood-based brain injury biomarker levels on day 3. In exploratory analysis, we found that early beta-blocker may associated with decreased NSE level on day 14. Due to the retrospective nature of the study and the use of propensity-weighted analysis to identify associations, direct clinical practice changes cannot be recommended. However, the significant association with NSE level warrants further investigation through prospective studies or randomized controlled trials to confirm the potential neuroprotective effect of early beta-blocker exposure on neuronal cellular injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"423-434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206746/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144545315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enteral nutrition delivery in patients admitted to a critical care unit following major trauma: Who's at risk and what's the impact? 重大创伤后入住重症监护病房的患者肠内营养输送:谁有风险,影响是什么?
IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-06-29 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1177/17511437251349679
Carys Davies, Lina Johansson, Stephen J Brett, Elaine Cole

Background: Hypermetabolism and enteral nutrition delivery challenges, result in trauma patients, becoming malnourished during their hospital, admission. This study aimed to explore enteral nutrition delivery, predictors of suboptimal delivery and the relationship with clinical outcomes in patients admitted to a critical care unit following major trauma.

Methods: An exploration of nutrition related data collected as part of a multicentre prospective major trauma study was conducted. Nutrition related data included anthropometry, nutrition risk screening, feeding route, nutrition products, target volume, nutrition delivery and causes of enteral feeding interruptions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the strongest associations with suboptimal nutrition delivery.

Results: Of 1036 participants, 71% (n = 732) required enteral nutrition for a mean of 15.7 (7.9) days. Suboptimal nutrition delivery was prevalent throughout the admission. Mean energy target was 23.8 (6.37) versus 15.81 (3.43) kcal/kg/day delivered (p < 0.001). Mean protein target was 1.27 (0.34) versus 0.89 (0.48) g/kg/day delivered (p < 0.001). Factors associated with suboptimal nutrition delivery included male sex (OR, 1.82, 95% CI 1.27-2.60; p < 0.001), traumatic brain injury (OR, 1.67, 95% CI 1.16-2.40; p = 0.006) or high NUTRIC score (OR, 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.27; p < 0.001); early enteral nutrition reduced the risk of underfeeding (OR, 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.81; p = 0.006). Lower energy and protein delivery were associated with increased days of mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001) and longer length of stay in both the critical care unit and overall hospital stay (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Trauma patients experience inadequate enteral nutrition delivery which potentially negatively impacts clinical outcomes. Additional investigation is required to further understand the barriers and facilitators to adequate nutrition provision in critically ill trauma patients.

背景:高代谢和肠内营养输送的挑战,导致创伤患者在入院期间营养不良。本研究旨在探讨肠内营养输送、次优输送的预测因素以及与重大创伤后入住重症监护病房的患者临床结局的关系。方法:对一项多中心前瞻性重大创伤研究中收集的营养相关数据进行了探索。营养相关数据包括人体测量、营养风险筛查、喂养途径、营养产品、目标体积、营养输送和肠内喂养中断的原因。多变量logistic回归分析用于评估与次优营养输送的最强关联。结果:在1036名参与者中,71% (n = 732)需要肠内营养,平均15.7(7.9)天。在整个入院过程中,营养输送不理想的情况普遍存在。平均能量目标为23.8 (6.37)vs 15.81 (3.43) kcal/kg/day交付(p p p p = 0.006)或高NUTRIC评分(or, 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.27;p = 0.006)。较低的能量和蛋白质输送与机械通气天数增加有关(p)结论:创伤患者肠内营养输送不足,可能对临床结果产生负面影响。需要进一步的调查,以进一步了解障碍和促进充分的营养提供创伤重症患者。
{"title":"Enteral nutrition delivery in patients admitted to a critical care unit following major trauma: Who's at risk and what's the impact?","authors":"Carys Davies, Lina Johansson, Stephen J Brett, Elaine Cole","doi":"10.1177/17511437251349679","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17511437251349679","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypermetabolism and enteral nutrition delivery challenges, result in trauma patients, becoming malnourished during their hospital, admission. This study aimed to explore enteral nutrition delivery, predictors of suboptimal delivery and the relationship with clinical outcomes in patients admitted to a critical care unit following major trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exploration of nutrition related data collected as part of a multicentre prospective major trauma study was conducted. Nutrition related data included anthropometry, nutrition risk screening, feeding route, nutrition products, target volume, nutrition delivery and causes of enteral feeding interruptions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the strongest associations with suboptimal nutrition delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1036 participants, 71% (<i>n</i> = 732) required enteral nutrition for a mean of 15.7 (7.9) days. Suboptimal nutrition delivery was prevalent throughout the admission. Mean energy target was 23.8 (6.37) versus 15.81 (3.43) kcal/kg/day delivered (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Mean protein target was 1.27 (0.34) versus 0.89 (0.48) g/kg/day delivered (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Factors associated with suboptimal nutrition delivery included male sex (OR, 1.82, 95% CI 1.27-2.60; <i>p</i> < 0.001), traumatic brain injury (OR, 1.67, 95% CI 1.16-2.40; <i>p</i> = 0.006) or high NUTRIC score (OR, 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.27; <i>p</i> < 0.001); early enteral nutrition reduced the risk of underfeeding (OR, 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.81; <i>p</i> = 0.006). Lower energy and protein delivery were associated with increased days of mechanical ventilation (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and longer length of stay in both the critical care unit and overall hospital stay (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trauma patients experience inadequate enteral nutrition delivery which potentially negatively impacts clinical outcomes. Additional investigation is required to further understand the barriers and facilitators to adequate nutrition provision in critically ill trauma patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"435-445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206743/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144545316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Geographical disparities in adult intensive care beds in the English National Health Service: A retrospective, observational panel data study. 英国国家卫生服务成人重症监护病床的地理差异:一项回顾性、观察性面板数据研究。
IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1177/17511437251350808
Reena Mehta, Raliat Onatade, Savvas Vlachos, Ritesh Maharaj

Background: The English National Health Service (NHS) is a publicly funded system, however significant disparities in provision exist. Whereas the national picture of the distribution of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) beds has increased over time, less is understood about the regional variation in the rate of growth in ICU services and whether this is related to population growth. The aim of this study was to describe the national variation in the supply of ICU beds in England and evaluate whether there has been a narrowing of the regional disparities in providing ICU beds over time.

Methods: Population-based panel analysis of ICU bed supply over a 10-year period, 2012-2021. Data were obtained from publicly available national resources. Descriptive analyses were summarised and trends examined. Disparity gap of ICU beds were calculated for each region. A fixed-effect panel data regression model was used to see the effect of unobserved variables on ICU bed supply for a particular region compared to the country average. Sub-group analysis was done for those 65 years and over.

Results: Overall, ICU beds increased by 9.9%, resulting in a 2.2% increase in ICU beds per 100k population and a decrease by 5.1% in those aged 65 years and over. Between regions, ICU beds per capita varied over time, with a decrease in the South East but an increase in all other regions. In the population aged 65 years and over, the variation of a decrease in ICU beds was more pronounced, with the largest impact in the South East. To increase regional ICU bed capacity to the same as London, which was the region with the highest per capita, for total population, an uplift of 29% to 109% of ICU beds is required and 104% to 246% in those 65 years and over. The unobserved variables have the highest positive impact in ICU bed supply in London and the highest negative impact in the Midlands.

Conclusion: ICU bed supply showed significant regional variations across England. We did not identify any significant narrowing of the regional disparities in provision of ICU beds over time. Further research should focus on better understanding the policy framework that underlies the regional supply of healthcare.

背景:英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)是一个公共资助的体系,然而在提供方面存在着显著的差距。尽管随着时间的推移,重症监护病房(ICU)床位分布的全国情况有所增加,但人们对ICU服务增长率的区域差异以及这是否与人口增长有关知之甚少。本研究的目的是描述英国ICU床位供应的国家差异,并评估随着时间的推移,提供ICU床位的地区差异是否已经缩小。方法:以人群为基础的面板分析2012-2021年10年间ICU床位供应情况。数据来自可公开获得的国家资源。总结了描述性分析并检查了趋势。计算各地区ICU床位差距。使用固定效应面板数据回归模型来查看未观察变量对特定地区与国家平均水平相比的ICU床位供应的影响。对65岁及以上的人进行亚组分析。结果:总体而言,ICU床位增加了9.9%,导致每10万人口ICU床位增加2.2%,65岁及以上人口ICU床位减少5.1%。在不同地区之间,人均ICU床位随着时间的推移而变化,东南地区减少,但所有其他地区都增加。在65岁及以上的人群中,ICU床位减少的变化更为明显,东南地区的影响最大。若要将区域ICU病床容量增加到与伦敦(人均最高的地区)相同,则需要将总人口的ICU病床数量增加29%至109%,65岁及以上人群的ICU病床数量增加104%至246%。未观察到的变量对伦敦ICU床位供应的积极影响最大,对中部地区的负面影响最大。结论:ICU床位供应在英国各地存在显著的地区差异。我们没有发现随着时间的推移,ICU床位供应的地区差异有任何显著的缩小。进一步的研究应侧重于更好地理解作为区域卫生保健供应基础的政策框架。
{"title":"Geographical disparities in adult intensive care beds in the English National Health Service: A retrospective, observational panel data study.","authors":"Reena Mehta, Raliat Onatade, Savvas Vlachos, Ritesh Maharaj","doi":"10.1177/17511437251350808","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17511437251350808","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The English National Health Service (NHS) is a publicly funded system, however significant disparities in provision exist. Whereas the national picture of the distribution of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) beds has increased over time, less is understood about the regional variation in the rate of growth in ICU services and whether this is related to population growth. The aim of this study was to describe the national variation in the supply of ICU beds in England and evaluate whether there has been a narrowing of the regional disparities in providing ICU beds over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Population-based panel analysis of ICU bed supply over a 10-year period, 2012-2021. Data were obtained from publicly available national resources. Descriptive analyses were summarised and trends examined. Disparity gap of ICU beds were calculated for each region. A fixed-effect panel data regression model was used to see the effect of unobserved variables on ICU bed supply for a particular region compared to the country average. Sub-group analysis was done for those 65 years and over.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, ICU beds increased by 9.9%, resulting in a 2.2% increase in ICU beds per 100k population and a decrease by 5.1% in those aged 65 years and over. Between regions, ICU beds per capita varied over time, with a decrease in the South East but an increase in all other regions. In the population aged 65 years and over, the variation of a decrease in ICU beds was more pronounced, with the largest impact in the South East. To increase regional ICU bed capacity to the same as London, which was the region with the highest per capita, for total population, an uplift of 29% to 109% of ICU beds is required and 104% to 246% in those 65 years and over. The unobserved variables have the highest positive impact in ICU bed supply in London and the highest negative impact in the Midlands.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICU bed supply showed significant regional variations across England. We did not identify any significant narrowing of the regional disparities in provision of ICU beds over time. Further research should focus on better understanding the policy framework that underlies the regional supply of healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"457-465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245829/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144627364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Use of point of care bowel ultrasound for diagnosis of suspected necrotizing enterocolitis: A feasibility study. 使用护理点肠超声(BUS)诊断疑似坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC):可行性研究。
IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-06-17 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1177/17511437251346376
Amitava Sur, Namitha Gopinathansarasa

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a potentially fatal comorbidity of prematurity with one in five affected requiring surgical intervention. Despite its seriousness, there is lack of objective radiographic criteria on plain abdomnial radiographs (X-ray) to guide prognosis and decision making. Point of care bowel ultrasound (BUS) provides a more dynamic assessment and more information around bowel health. However, there is lack of widespread adoption of this practice by neonatologists due to training opportunities and inconsistent support from radiologists. We present a feasibility study from UK of using point of care bowel ultrasound in conjunction with X-ray to aid diagnosis of NEC. We report that that neonatologist performed BUS when used as an additional diagnostic aid has a higher positive predictive value and specificity compared to X-rays alone. Features like absent or poor peristalsis and abnormal bowel perfusion were the most consistent pathological findings in our cohort. Wider implementation of this practice is limited by training opportunities and dedicated support from radiology team.

坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)是一种潜在的致命的早产合并症,五分之一的患者需要手术干预。尽管其严重,但腹部平片(x线)缺乏客观的影像学标准来指导预后和决策。护理点肠超声(BUS)提供了一个更动态的评估和更多关于肠道健康的信息。然而,由于培训机会和放射科医生不一致的支持,新生儿医生缺乏广泛采用这种做法。我们提出可行性研究,从英国使用点护理肠超声与x线结合,以帮助诊断NEC。我们报道,与单独使用x光相比,新生儿医生将BUS作为额外的诊断辅助具有更高的阳性预测值和特异性。在我们的队列中,蠕动缺失或不良以及肠灌注异常等特征是最一致的病理表现。这种做法的广泛实施受到培训机会和放射科团队的专门支持的限制。
{"title":"Use of point of care bowel ultrasound for diagnosis of suspected necrotizing enterocolitis: A feasibility study.","authors":"Amitava Sur, Namitha Gopinathansarasa","doi":"10.1177/17511437251346376","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17511437251346376","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a potentially fatal comorbidity of prematurity with one in five affected requiring surgical intervention. Despite its seriousness, there is lack of objective radiographic criteria on plain abdomnial radiographs (X-ray) to guide prognosis and decision making. Point of care bowel ultrasound (BUS) provides a more dynamic assessment and more information around bowel health. However, there is lack of widespread adoption of this practice by neonatologists due to training opportunities and inconsistent support from radiologists. We present a feasibility study from UK of using point of care bowel ultrasound in conjunction with X-ray to aid diagnosis of NEC. We report that that neonatologist performed BUS when used as an additional diagnostic aid has a higher positive predictive value and specificity compared to X-rays alone. Features like absent or poor peristalsis and abnormal bowel perfusion were the most consistent pathological findings in our cohort. Wider implementation of this practice is limited by training opportunities and dedicated support from radiology team.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"485-490"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174579/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144334090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critical care and the law: Pertinent cases from 2023. 重症监护和法律:2023年的相关案例。
IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-06-17 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1177/17511437251346304
Aaron D'Sa, Robert Tobin, Luigi Camporota, Thearina de Beer, Dan Harvey, Richard Innes, Prashanth Nandhabalan, Victoria Metaxa

This review by the Legal and Ethical Advisory Group (LEAG) summarizes the important legal cases and prevention of future deaths (PFDs) ruled or issued in 2023 that are pertinent to Intensive Care Medicine. The legal cases include human rights cases, clinical negligence and rulings of the court of protection. Not all of the cases relate to events which have occurred in intensive care, however the rulings will have a bearing on intensive care practice.

法律和伦理咨询小组(LEAG)总结了2023年裁定或发布的与重症监护医学相关的重要法律案件和预防未来死亡(PFDs)。法律案件包括人权案件、临床过失和保护法院的裁决。并非所有的案件都与重症监护中发生的事件有关,但这些裁决将对重症监护实践产生影响。
{"title":"Critical care and the law: Pertinent cases from 2023.","authors":"Aaron D'Sa, Robert Tobin, Luigi Camporota, Thearina de Beer, Dan Harvey, Richard Innes, Prashanth Nandhabalan, Victoria Metaxa","doi":"10.1177/17511437251346304","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17511437251346304","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review by the Legal and Ethical Advisory Group (LEAG) summarizes the important legal cases and prevention of future deaths (PFDs) ruled or issued in 2023 that are pertinent to Intensive Care Medicine. The legal cases include human rights cases, clinical negligence and rulings of the court of protection. Not all of the cases relate to events which have occurred in intensive care, however the rulings will have a bearing on intensive care practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"491-495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174085/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144334088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ipsilateral placement of central venous catheters and dialysis catheters does not affect the distance between line tips, blood pressure or noradrenaline requirements. 同侧放置中心静脉导管和透析导管不影响线尖之间的距离、血压或去甲肾上腺素需求。
IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-06-17 eCollection Date: 2025-11-01 DOI: 10.1177/17511437251347145
Benjamin Hobson, Patrick Thorburn, Theophilus Samuels, Luke Hodgson

Debate exists about the safety of inserting central venous catheters (CVC) and central venous dialysis catheters (CVDC) ipsilaterally, lest the catheter tips lie in close proximity risking direct aspiration of vasopressors from the CVC into the CVDC. This study showed that ipsilateral or contralateral placement did not affect the distance between CVC and CVDC line tips. There were no significant adverse changes in cardiovascular parameters or noradrenaline dose when CRRT was commenced regardless of whether the lines were inserted ipsilaterally or contralaterally.

关于中心静脉导管(CVC)和中心静脉透析导管(CVDC)同侧插入的安全性存在争议,以免导管尖端靠近CVC有直接从CVC吸入血管加压剂到CVDC的风险。本研究表明,同侧或对侧放置不影响CVC和CVDC线尖端之间的距离。CRRT开始时,无论导管是同侧插入还是对侧插入,心血管参数或去甲肾上腺素剂量均无明显不良变化。
{"title":"Ipsilateral placement of central venous catheters and dialysis catheters does not affect the distance between line tips, blood pressure or noradrenaline requirements.","authors":"Benjamin Hobson, Patrick Thorburn, Theophilus Samuels, Luke Hodgson","doi":"10.1177/17511437251347145","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17511437251347145","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Debate exists about the safety of inserting central venous catheters (CVC) and central venous dialysis catheters (CVDC) ipsilaterally, lest the catheter tips lie in close proximity risking direct aspiration of vasopressors from the CVC into the CVDC. This study showed that ipsilateral or contralateral placement did not affect the distance between CVC and CVDC line tips. There were no significant adverse changes in cardiovascular parameters or noradrenaline dose when CRRT was commenced regardless of whether the lines were inserted ipsilaterally or contralaterally.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"535-536"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12174087/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144334089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biomarkers for pneumonia after major trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 重大创伤后肺炎的生物标志物:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-06-13 DOI: 10.1177/17511437251344068
Fiona Howroyd, Amanda Veiga Sardeli, Fang Gao Smith, Tonny Veenith, Niharika A Duggal, Zubair Ahmed

Background: Major trauma is a significant global health issue. Pneumonia poses an additional risk for morbidity and mortality after major trauma yet identifying pneumonia remains challenging in clinical practice. This systematic review aims to evaluate blood-based biomarkers for pneumonia in major trauma patients.

Methods: The search was performed across four databases up to November 18th 2024, including primary studies investigating blood-based biomarkers associated with pneumonia in adults hospitalised after major trauma (PROSPERO CRD42024542059). Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool and meta-analysis was performed of pooled data.

Results: Among 20 included studies, with a total of 4316 participants, the pooled mean pneumonia rate was 32.7% (23.5%-43.4%). Seventy biomarkers for post-operative pneumonia were identified, with meta-analysis possible for 12 of the reported biomarkers. At admission interleukin (IL)-6 (standardised mean difference: 1.41 (0.04-2.77), p = 0.04), cytokeratin fragment 21-1 (CYFRA21-1; 0.53 (0.19-0.86), p = 0.002) and leucocyte count (0.28 (0.05-0.50), p = 0.01) were higher in patients who developed pneumonia. During hospitalisation, patients with pneumonia had significantly higher IL-10 (4.42 (3.89-4.95), p > 0.001) and neutrophil oxidative burst capacity (1.52 (0.96-2.09), p > 0.001) at day 1, CYFRA21-1 at day 2 (0.43 (0.10-0.76), p = 0.01), IL-6 at day 3 (3.11 (2.66-3.55), p > 0.001) and day 5 (0.57 (0.05-1.09), p = 0.03) and CRP at day 4 (1.87 (1.51-2.24), p > 0.001), day 5 (1.38 (1.03-1.72), p > 0.001), day 6 (0.74 (0.42-1.06), p > 0.001) and day 7 (0.87 (0.12-1.63), p = 0.02). Across the included studies, 85% exhibited some concerns to very high risk of bias.

Conclusions: While we identified potential candidate biomarkers for pneumonia in major trauma patients, the high heterogeneity across trauma populations, clinical diagnostic tools and biomarker testing methods warrants further high-quality studies to confirm their clinical value.

背景:重大创伤是一个重大的全球健康问题。肺炎对重大创伤后的发病率和死亡率有额外的风险,但在临床实践中识别肺炎仍然具有挑战性。本系统综述旨在评估基于血液的生物标志物在重大创伤患者肺炎。方法:检索在四个数据库中进行,截至2024年11月18日,包括调查重大创伤后住院成人肺炎相关血液生物标志物的初步研究(PROSPERO CRD42024542059)。使用ROBINS-E工具评估偏倚风险,并对汇总数据进行荟萃分析。结果:纳入的20项研究共纳入4316名受试者,合并平均肺炎发生率为32.7%(23.5%-43.4%)。确定了70个术后肺炎的生物标志物,并对其中12个报道的生物标志物进行了荟萃分析。入院时,白细胞介素(IL)-6(标准化平均差:1.41 (0.04-2.77),p = 0.04),细胞角蛋白片段21-1 (CYFRA21-1;肺炎患者白细胞计数(0.53 (0.19-0.86),p = 0.002)和白细胞计数(0.28 (0.05-0.50),p = 0.01)较高。在住院治疗期间,患者肺炎有显著较高的il - 10 (4.42 (3.89 - -4.95), p > 0.001)和中性粒细胞氧化破裂能力(1.52 (0.96 - -2.09),p > 0.001)在第一天,CYFRA21-1在第二天(0.43 (0.10 - -0.76),p = 0.01), il - 6在第三天(3.11 (2.66 - -3.55),p > 0.001),第五天(0.57 (0.05 - -1.09),p = 0.03)和c反应蛋白在第四天(1.87 (1.51 - -2.24),p > 0.001),第五天(1.38 (1.03 - -1.72),p > 0.001),一天6 (0.74 (0.42 - -1.06),p > 0.001),第七天(0.87 (0.12 - -1.63),p = 0.02)。在纳入的研究中,85%的研究表现出对非常高的偏倚风险的担忧。结论:虽然我们确定了重大创伤患者肺炎的潜在候选生物标志物,但创伤人群、临床诊断工具和生物标志物检测方法的高度异质性需要进一步的高质量研究来证实其临床价值。
{"title":"Biomarkers for pneumonia after major trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Fiona Howroyd, Amanda Veiga Sardeli, Fang Gao Smith, Tonny Veenith, Niharika A Duggal, Zubair Ahmed","doi":"10.1177/17511437251344068","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17511437251344068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major trauma is a significant global health issue. Pneumonia poses an additional risk for morbidity and mortality after major trauma yet identifying pneumonia remains challenging in clinical practice. This systematic review aims to evaluate blood-based biomarkers for pneumonia in major trauma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search was performed across four databases up to November 18th 2024, including primary studies investigating blood-based biomarkers associated with pneumonia in adults hospitalised after major trauma (PROSPERO CRD42024542059). Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool and meta-analysis was performed of pooled data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 20 included studies, with a total of 4316 participants, the pooled mean pneumonia rate was 32.7% (23.5%-43.4%). Seventy biomarkers for post-operative pneumonia were identified, with meta-analysis possible for 12 of the reported biomarkers. At admission interleukin (IL)-6 (standardised mean difference: 1.41 (0.04-2.77), <i>p</i> = 0.04), cytokeratin fragment 21-1 (CYFRA21-1; 0.53 (0.19-0.86), <i>p</i> = 0.002) and leucocyte count (0.28 (0.05-0.50), <i>p</i> = 0.01) were higher in patients who developed pneumonia. During hospitalisation, patients with pneumonia had significantly higher IL-10 (4.42 (3.89-4.95), <i>p</i> > 0.001) and neutrophil oxidative burst capacity (1.52 (0.96-2.09), <i>p</i> > 0.001) at day 1, CYFRA21-1 at day 2 (0.43 (0.10-0.76), <i>p</i> = 0.01), IL-6 at day 3 (3.11 (2.66-3.55), <i>p</i> > 0.001) and day 5 (0.57 (0.05-1.09), <i>p</i> = 0.03) and CRP at day 4 (1.87 (1.51-2.24), <i>p</i> > 0.001), day 5 (1.38 (1.03-1.72), <i>p</i> > 0.001), day 6 (0.74 (0.42-1.06), <i>p</i> > 0.001) and day 7 (0.87 (0.12-1.63), <i>p</i> = 0.02). Across the included studies, 85% exhibited some concerns to very high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While we identified potential candidate biomarkers for pneumonia in major trauma patients, the high heterogeneity across trauma populations, clinical diagnostic tools and biomarker testing methods warrants further high-quality studies to confirm their clinical value.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437251344068"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165960/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144303141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Update to the Local Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (LocSSIPs) - Central venous catheter insertion, intercostal drain insertion, tracheostomy, bronchoscopy, intubation. 侵入性手术的地方安全标准(LocSSIPs)的更新-中心静脉导管插入,肋间引流管插入,气管造口术,支气管镜检查,插管。
IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-05-29 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1177/17511437251327552
Clare Windsor, Peter Hersey, Waqas Akhtar, Peter Bamford, Jayaprakash Patil

The Intensive Care Society and Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine are pleased to launch revised procedural checklists, Local Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (LocSIPPs) that we hope will improve the safety of our intensive care units. First produced in 2017, the updates take into account learning from reported patient safety incidents, some of which have been associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The publication of NatSIPPs 2 has been acknowledged during the update. We have focused on procedures which are commonly performed in Critical Care Units (intubation, bronchoscopy, intercostal drain insertion, tracheostomy insertion, central venous catheter insertion). The checklists have been designed to enable departments to use and adapt to make them unit specific. They will require relevant educational and clinical governance procedures to accompany them, to fit into local working practices.

重症监护学会和重症医学系很高兴推出修订后的程序检查表,侵入性手术的当地安全标准(LocSIPPs),我们希望能提高重症监护病房的安全性。该更新报告于2017年首次发布,考虑了从报告的患者安全事件中吸取的教训,其中一些事件与相当高的发病率和死亡率有关。NatSIPPs 2的发布已在更新期间得到确认。我们的重点是在重症监护病房(气管插管、支气管镜检查、肋间引流管插入、气管造口术插入、中心静脉导管插入)中常见的手术。检查清单的设计使各部门能够使用和适应,使其特定于各单位。他们将需要相关的教育和临床管理程序来配合,以适应当地的工作实践。
{"title":"Update to the Local Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (LocSSIPs) - Central venous catheter insertion, intercostal drain insertion, tracheostomy, bronchoscopy, intubation.","authors":"Clare Windsor, Peter Hersey, Waqas Akhtar, Peter Bamford, Jayaprakash Patil","doi":"10.1177/17511437251327552","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17511437251327552","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Intensive Care Society and Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine are pleased to launch revised procedural checklists, Local Safety Standards for Invasive Procedures (LocSIPPs) that we hope will improve the safety of our intensive care units. First produced in 2017, the updates take into account learning from reported patient safety incidents, some of which have been associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The publication of NatSIPPs 2 has been acknowledged during the update. We have focused on procedures which are commonly performed in Critical Care Units (intubation, bronchoscopy, intercostal drain insertion, tracheostomy insertion, central venous catheter insertion). The checklists have been designed to enable departments to use and adapt to make them unit specific. They will require relevant educational and clinical governance procedures to accompany them, to fit into local working practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"379-385"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12122489/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144200269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: A primer for acute care practitioners. 自发性蛛网膜下腔出血:初级急性护理从业人员。
IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-05-27 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1177/17511437251333269
Heppner Jonathan, Chwalek Michal, Findlay Max, Brindley Peter George

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) refers to intracranial bleeding into the cerebrospinal filled space beneath the arachnoid membrane that covers the brain. It is further defined as a spontaneous SAH when not associated with trauma. The commonest single cause is rupture of a saccular (i.e. a small bag-shaped or pouch-shaped) intracranial aneurysm, arising from the larger conducting arteries traveling through the subarachnoid space at the base of the brain. As these are high-pressure and higher-volume arterial hemorrhages, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages (aSAH) are associated with high early mortality and substantial long-term morbidity. But, as we outline below, prompt and collaborative multidisciplinary care can improve the likelihood and quality of survival. Accordingly, we offer the following primer as a common resource to increase knowledge and collaborative care.

蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)是指颅内出血进入覆盖大脑的蛛网膜下的脑脊液填充空间。它被进一步定义为自发性SAH,但与创伤无关。最常见的单一原因是囊状(即小袋状或袋状)颅内动脉瘤破裂,由穿过脑底部蛛网膜下腔的较大传导动脉引起。由于这些是高压和大容量的动脉出血,动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)与高早期死亡率和大量长期发病率相关。但是,正如我们下面概述的那样,及时和协作的多学科治疗可以提高生存的可能性和质量。因此,我们提供以下引物作为增加知识和协作护理的共同资源。
{"title":"Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage: A primer for acute care practitioners.","authors":"Heppner Jonathan, Chwalek Michal, Findlay Max, Brindley Peter George","doi":"10.1177/17511437251333269","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17511437251333269","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) refers to intracranial bleeding into the cerebrospinal filled space beneath the arachnoid membrane that covers the brain. It is further defined as a spontaneous SAH when not associated with trauma. The commonest single cause is rupture of a saccular (i.e. a small bag-shaped or pouch-shaped) intracranial aneurysm, arising from the larger conducting arteries traveling through the subarachnoid space at the base of the brain. As these are high-pressure and higher-volume arterial hemorrhages, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages (aSAH) are associated with high early mortality and substantial long-term morbidity. But, as we outline below, prompt and collaborative multidisciplinary care can improve the likelihood and quality of survival. Accordingly, we offer the following primer as a common resource to increase knowledge and collaborative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"369-378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12116491/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144182664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A retrospective comparison study of delayed admissions into the critical care unit. 一项延迟入住重症监护病房的回顾性比较研究。
IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pub Date : 2025-05-26 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI: 10.1177/17511437251333268
Simran Aujla, Sanjog Banstola, Shondipon Laha, Craig Marshall

Little is known about the effect of alternative patient routes prior to ICU admission on clinical outcomes. Therefore, this study compared patients that were admitted directly from the emergency department into the ICU with those admitted from the wards. Patients admitted from the wards had significantly higher SOFA (6 vs 5, p = 0.038) and APACHE scores (19 vs 16, p = 0.007), as well as a greater need for invasive ventilation (45.5% vs 28.6%, p < 0.001). Hence, this hypothesis-generating study suggests that further work is needed to assess if scoring systems are sensitive enough to assess the need for ICU admission.

关于ICU入院前患者的替代路线对临床结果的影响知之甚少。因此,本研究比较了直接从急诊科进入ICU的患者和从病房进入ICU的患者。从病房入院的患者有更高的SOFA(6比5,p = 0.038)和APACHE评分(19比16,p = 0.007),以及更大的有创通气需求(45.5%比28.6%,p = 0.007)
{"title":"A retrospective comparison study of delayed admissions into the critical care unit.","authors":"Simran Aujla, Sanjog Banstola, Shondipon Laha, Craig Marshall","doi":"10.1177/17511437251333268","DOIUrl":"10.1177/17511437251333268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Little is known about the effect of alternative patient routes prior to ICU admission on clinical outcomes. Therefore, this study compared patients that were admitted directly from the emergency department into the ICU with those admitted from the wards. Patients admitted from the wards had significantly higher SOFA (6 vs 5, <i>p</i> = 0.038) and APACHE scores (19 vs 16, <i>p</i> = 0.007), as well as a greater need for invasive ventilation (45.5% vs 28.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Hence, this hypothesis-generating study suggests that further work is needed to assess if scoring systems are sensitive enough to assess the need for ICU admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"404-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12106374/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144175191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1