The article provides an annotated list, which contains 35 species and subspecific taxa of desmid algae collected in 2015 in swamps near Yugorsk city, West Siberia. Twelve species (Closterium costatum, Cosmarium regnesi, Euastrum ansatum, E. gayanum, E. pulchellum, Staurastrum aculeatum, S. arcuatum var. subavicula, S. tohopekaligense, Staurodesmus dickiei var. circularis, S. glaber, Xanthidium cristatum, X. uncinatum) and one variety (Closterium closterioides var. intermedium) are new for the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug. Data on morphology and distribution of the species are provided.
本文提供了一份有注释的清单，其中包含2015年在西西伯利亚尤戈尔斯克市附近的沼泽中收集的35种和亚特异分类群。汉曼自治区新发现的12个新变种(costatum, Cosmarium regnesi, Euastrum anatum, E. gayanum, E. pulchellum, a . aculatum, S. arcuatum变种subavicula, S. tohopekaligense, Staurodesmus dickiei变种circularis, S. glaber, Xanthidium cristum, X. cinatum)和1个新变种(Closterium closterioides变种. intermedium)。提供了该物种的形态和分布数据。
{"title":"Diversity of desmid algae (Charophyta: Conjugatophyceae) in the vicinity of Yugorsk city (KMAO-Yugra, Russia)","authors":"A. S. Shakhmatov, Evgeniy V. Pavlovskiy","doi":"10.12697/fce.2019.56.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12697/fce.2019.56.03","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000The article provides an annotated list, which contains 35 species and subspecific taxa of desmid algae collected in 2015 in swamps near Yugorsk city, West Siberia. Twelve species (Closterium costatum, Cosmarium regnesi, Euastrum ansatum, E. gayanum, E. pulchellum, Staurastrum aculeatum, S. arcuatum var. subavicula, S. tohopekaligense, Staurodesmus dickiei var. circularis, S. glaber, Xanthidium cristatum, X. uncinatum) and one variety (Closterium closterioides var. intermedium) are new for the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug. Data on morphology and distribution of the species are provided. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":39299,"journal":{"name":"Folia Cryptogamica Estonica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.12697/fce.2019.56.03","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44582413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
I. Stepanchikova, D. Himelbrant, U. Schiefelbein, J. Motiejūnaitė, T. Ahti, M. Andreev
We present a checklist for Moshchny Island (Leningrad Region, Russia). The documented lichen biota comprises 349 species, including 313 lichens, 30 lichenicolous fungi and 6 non-lichenized saprobic fungi. Endococcus exerrans and Lichenopeltella coppinsii are reported for the first time for Russia; Cercidospora stenotropae, Erythricium aurantiacum, Flavoplaca limonia, Lecidea haerjedalica, and Myriospora myochroa for European Russia; Flavoplaca oasis, Intralichen christiansenii, Nesolechia fusca, and Myriolecis zosterae for North-Western European Russia; and Arthrorhaphis aeruginosa, Calogaya pusilla, and Lecidea auriculata subsp. auriculata are new for Leningrad Region. The studied lichen biota is moderately rich and diverse, but a long history of human activity likely caused its transformation, especially the degradation of forest lichen biota. The most valuable habitats for lichens in Moshchny Island are seashore and dune communities which definitely deserve protection.
{"title":"The lichens of Moshchny Island (Lavansaari) – one of the remote islands in the Gulf of Finland","authors":"I. Stepanchikova, D. Himelbrant, U. Schiefelbein, J. Motiejūnaitė, T. Ahti, M. Andreev","doi":"10.12697/fce.2019.56.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12697/fce.2019.56.05","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000We present a checklist for Moshchny Island (Leningrad Region, Russia). The documented lichen biota comprises 349 species, including 313 lichens, 30 lichenicolous fungi and 6 non-lichenized saprobic fungi. Endococcus exerrans and Lichenopeltella coppinsii are reported for the first time for Russia; Cercidospora stenotropae, Erythricium aurantiacum, Flavoplaca limonia, Lecidea haerjedalica, and Myriospora myochroa for European Russia; Flavoplaca oasis, Intralichen christiansenii, Nesolechia fusca, and Myriolecis zosterae for North-Western European Russia; and Arthrorhaphis aeruginosa, Calogaya pusilla, and Lecidea auriculata subsp. auriculata are new for Leningrad Region. The studied lichen biota is moderately rich and diverse, but a long history of human activity likely caused its transformation, especially the degradation of forest lichen biota. The most valuable habitats for lichens in Moshchny Island are seashore and dune communities which definitely deserve protection. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":39299,"journal":{"name":"Folia Cryptogamica Estonica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48723972","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Three lichen species (Anaptychia elbursiana, A. roemeri and Megaspora rimisorediata) are reported for the first time for Russia from Dagestan. Anaptychia elbursiana is reported for the first time from North Caucasus, and Anaptychia roemeri and Megaspora rimisorediata from the Greater Caucasus. The characteristic features of the species and information on their morphology, anatomy, ecology and world distribution are given. Differences from similar species are discussed.
{"title":"New lichenized fungi for Russia from Dagestan (East Caucasus)","authors":"A. Ismailov, G. Urbanavichus, J. Vondrák","doi":"10.12697/fce.2019.56.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12697/fce.2019.56.02","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000Three lichen species (Anaptychia elbursiana, A. roemeri and Megaspora rimisorediata) are reported for the first time for Russia from Dagestan. Anaptychia elbursiana is reported for the first time from North Caucasus, and Anaptychia roemeri and Megaspora rimisorediata from the Greater Caucasus. The characteristic features of the species and information on their morphology, anatomy, ecology and world distribution are given. Differences from similar species are discussed. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":39299,"journal":{"name":"Folia Cryptogamica Estonica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46863415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
K. Vellak, Rut Caparrós Callejo, N. Ingerpuu, Mare Leis, L. Ehrlich, Tiiu Kupper
Five new moss species and one variety are incorporated to the Estonian bryoflora, one species should be eliminated due to recent taxonomical study. The number of bryophyte species has now risen to 602 for Estonia, thus the number of species has doubled since the first published list in 1860.
{"title":"Additions and amendments to the list of Estonian bryophytes","authors":"K. Vellak, Rut Caparrós Callejo, N. Ingerpuu, Mare Leis, L. Ehrlich, Tiiu Kupper","doi":"10.12697/fce.2019.56.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12697/fce.2019.56.01","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000Five new moss species and one variety are incorporated to the Estonian bryoflora, one species should be eliminated due to recent taxonomical study. The number of bryophyte species has now risen to 602 for Estonia, thus the number of species has doubled since the first published list in 1860. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":39299,"journal":{"name":"Folia Cryptogamica Estonica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42860298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The lichenized fungi Cetrelia monachorum, Peltigera castanea and P. occidentalis are reported as new to Estonia after revision of herbarium samples; one further species, Peltigera frippi Holt.-Hartw., must be excluded from the list of Estonian lichens as a misidentification.
{"title":"New Estonian records: Lichenized fungi","authors":"P. Degtjarenko, I. Jüriado, Piret Lõhmus","doi":"10.12697/fce.2018.55.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12697/fce.2018.55.15","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000The lichenized fungi Cetrelia monachorum, Peltigera castanea and P. occidentalis are reported as new to Estonia after revision of herbarium samples; one further species, Peltigera frippi Holt.-Hartw., must be excluded from the list of Estonian lichens as a misidentification. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":39299,"journal":{"name":"Folia Cryptogamica Estonica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49055642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A detailed study of lichen diversity and estimation of epiphytic lichen cover characteristics on spruce as a key ecosystem component was performed in boreal forests of Karelia (NW Russia). The aims of the present paper are: (1) to study lichen diversity on Norway spruce in the middle boreal forests of southern Karelia (NW Russia), and (2) to estimate the main characteristics of epiphytic lichen cover on spruce trunks and branches. In total, 158 species of lichens and allied fungi were found on spruce, including 108 species on trunks, 78 on branches and 55 on snags. Seventeen species are listed in the Red Data Book of Republic of Karelia. Ten species are new for the biogeographical province Karelia transonegensis and two for the province Karelia onegensis. Twenty-two species are considered old-growth forest indicators. The total epiphytic lichen cover on spruce trees averaged 59% at the trunk base, 12% at a height of 1.3 m above ground level and 61% on branches. Predominantly, only 12 species contributed to the lichen cover of trunk and branches. Despite the predominance of crustose lichens colonising spruce trees, the main epiphytic lichen cover both on trunks and branches was provided largely by foliose species (57% of the total cover). Due to a variety of morphological features, spruce provides diverse microhabitats, which leads to high lichen species richness with different ecological requirements. Spruce trees play a significant role in maintaining the diversity and conservation of rare species.
{"title":"Diversity of lichens and allied fungi on Norway spruce (Picea abies) in the middle boreal forests of Republic of Karelia (Russia)","authors":"V. Androsova, V. Tarasova, V. V. Gorshkov","doi":"10.12697/FCE.2018.55.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12697/FCE.2018.55.14","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000A detailed study of lichen diversity and estimation of epiphytic lichen cover characteristics on spruce as a key ecosystem component was performed in boreal forests of Karelia (NW Russia). The aims of the present paper are: (1) to study lichen diversity on Norway spruce in the middle boreal forests of southern Karelia (NW Russia), and (2) to estimate the main characteristics of epiphytic lichen cover on spruce trunks and branches. In total, 158 species of lichens and allied fungi were found on spruce, including 108 species on trunks, 78 on branches and 55 on snags. Seventeen species are listed in the Red Data Book of Republic of Karelia. Ten species are new for the biogeographical province Karelia transonegensis and two for the province Karelia onegensis. Twenty-two species are considered old-growth forest indicators. The total epiphytic lichen cover on spruce trees averaged 59% at the trunk base, 12% at a height of 1.3 m above ground level and 61% on branches. Predominantly, only 12 species contributed to the lichen cover of trunk and branches. Despite the predominance of crustose lichens colonising spruce trees, the main epiphytic lichen cover both on trunks and branches was provided largely by foliose species (57% of the total cover). Due to a variety of morphological features, spruce provides diverse microhabitats, which leads to high lichen species richness with different ecological requirements. Spruce trees play a significant role in maintaining the diversity and conservation of rare species. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":39299,"journal":{"name":"Folia Cryptogamica Estonica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.12697/FCE.2018.55.14","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49432933","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrei Tsurykau, В. В. Голубков, П. Н. Белый, А.Г. Цуриков, Pavel Bely, Vladimir Golubkov
Two hundred six specimens of Xanthoparmelia collected in Belarus in 1905–2017 were examined based on morphological and chemical characters. Six species (X. angustiphylla, X. conspersa, X. delisei, X. loxodes, X. pulla and X. verruculifera) were identified in this study. Xanthoparmelia angustiphylla and X. delisei are reported for Belarus for the first time. Presence of Xanthoparmelia pokornyi and X. stenophylla has not been confirmed, and therefore these species should be excluded from the Belarusian list of lichens. A key to the species of Xanthoparmelia in Belarus is provided.
{"title":"The lichen genus Xanthoparmelia (Parmeliaceae) in Belarus","authors":"Andrei Tsurykau, В. В. Голубков, П. Н. Белый, А.Г. Цуриков, Pavel Bely, Vladimir Golubkov","doi":"10.12697/FCE.2018.55.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12697/FCE.2018.55.13","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000Two hundred six specimens of Xanthoparmelia collected in Belarus in 1905–2017 were examined based on morphological and chemical characters. Six species (X. angustiphylla, X. conspersa, X. delisei, X. loxodes, X. pulla and X. verruculifera) were identified in this study. Xanthoparmelia angustiphylla and X. delisei are reported for Belarus for the first time. Presence of Xanthoparmelia pokornyi and X. stenophylla has not been confirmed, and therefore these species should be excluded from the Belarusian list of lichens. A key to the species of Xanthoparmelia in Belarus is provided. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":39299,"journal":{"name":"Folia Cryptogamica Estonica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.12697/FCE.2018.55.13","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49283980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The annotated list of hepatics of Barents Island (Svalbard archipelago) was compiled based on the collections by Savchenko, literature data and Arne Frisvoll’s collection in TRH. A total of 35 species, three subspecies and four varieties are recorded for Barents Island. Fifteen taxa are listed as new for Barents Island and four taxa are listed as new for Svalbard, including Lophozia silvicola, Lophozia subapiculata, Preissia quadrata subsp. hyperborea and Lophoziopsis excisa var. elegans. A new combination Trilophozia quinquedentata var. turgida is made. Annotations to the species include distribution, description of habitats, and some morphological characteristics of the studied specimens. Peculiarities of the hepatic flora of the island and the distribution in Svalbard are discussed.
{"title":"Contribution to the bryophyte flora of Svalbard: hepatics of Barents Island","authors":"N. Konstantinova, A. Savchenko","doi":"10.12697/FCE.2018.55.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12697/FCE.2018.55.11","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000The annotated list of hepatics of Barents Island (Svalbard archipelago) was compiled based on the collections by Savchenko, literature data and Arne Frisvoll’s collection in TRH. A total of 35 species, three subspecies and four varieties are recorded for Barents Island. Fifteen taxa are listed as new for Barents Island and four taxa are listed as new for Svalbard, including Lophozia silvicola, Lophozia subapiculata, Preissia quadrata subsp. hyperborea and Lophoziopsis excisa var. elegans. A new combination Trilophozia quinquedentata var. turgida is made. Annotations to the species include distribution, description of habitats, and some morphological characteristics of the studied specimens. Peculiarities of the hepatic flora of the island and the distribution in Svalbard are discussed. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":39299,"journal":{"name":"Folia Cryptogamica Estonica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49381121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
All Estonian bryophyte species (597) that had written records up to 2018 were evaluated against IUCN criteria. More than half of the species belong to the least concern category, but almost one fourth (158) is evaluated as threatened, and one tenth (65) as near threatened. Eleven species are data deficient and 15 species are considered to be regionally extinct from Estonia. To achieve adequate assessment results for a small country, some criteria were adjusted. Changes compared to the previous red list and threats to the species are discussed. This version replaces the version of the same paper from 2018-08-14.
{"title":"Revised Red Data List of Estonian bryophytes","authors":"N. Ingerpuu, K. Vellak, L. Ehrlich","doi":"10.12697/FCE.2018.55.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12697/FCE.2018.55.10","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000All Estonian bryophyte species (597) that had written records up to 2018 were evaluated against IUCN criteria. More than half of the species belong to the least concern category, but almost one fourth (158) is evaluated as threatened, and one tenth (65) as near threatened. Eleven species are data deficient and 15 species are considered to be regionally extinct from Estonia. To achieve adequate assessment results for a small country, some criteria were adjusted. Changes compared to the previous red list and threats to the species are discussed. \u0000This version replaces the version of the same paper from 2018-08-14. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":39299,"journal":{"name":"Folia Cryptogamica Estonica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.12697/FCE.2018.55.10","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41506026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Conservation management for fungi has lagged behind animal and plant conservation, and remains largely restricted to protecting known locations of few conspicuous threatened species. We used Estonian polypores as an example of how conservation options can be systematically screened, based on the Red List of threatened species and in co-operation with practitioners. For a total of 61 species, we identified a broad range of management options representing diverse approaches (site protection; prescriptions of land use; protection of individuals; special management; protection via umbrella species). The results demonstrated the merits of systematic and multi-disciplinary assessments for fungal conservation and setting related research priorities. Our assessment also supported a theoretical expectation that some ecosystem conservation strategies should be explicitly designed based on functionally important groups of fungi. The advancement of fungal conservation appears largely dependent on co-operation between mycologists, conservationists and managers. Eesti metsade seenestiku looduskaitsevõtted torikseente näitel Seenestiku looduskaitseks kasutatav võttestik on märksa halvemini välja arendatud kui loomade ja taimede puhul ning hõlmab peamiselt silmatorkavate ohustatud liikide leiukohtade kaitset. Töös kirjeldatakse Eesti torikseente näitel, kuidas sobivaid looduskaitsevõtteid saab süstemaatiliselt valida – lähtuvalt ohustatud liikide nimestikust ja koostöös looduskaitsepraktikutega. Kokku eristati 61 ohustatud torikseeneliigi kaitseks lai valik võtteid, mis hõlmasid erinevaid võimalusi alade kaitseks, üldisi maakasutusjuhiseid, isendite kaitset, intensiivseid kaitsevõtteid ja kaitset teiste liikide (katusliikide) kaudu.Tulemused näitavad süstemaatilise ja multidistsiplinaarse analüüsi efektiivsust seente kaitse ja sellega seotud uuringute planeerimisel. Analüüs kinnitas ka teoreetilist, torikseente funktsionaalsest tähtsusest lähtuvat eeldust, et mõned ökosüsteemide kaitse võttestikud tuleks kujundada just seente ökoloogiast lähtuvalt. Seenestiku looduskaitse peamine edenemistingimus paistab niisiis olevat koostöö mükoloogide, looduskaitseteadlaste ja -praktikute vahel.
{"title":"Conservation management for forest fungi in Estonia: the case of polypores","authors":"A. Lõhmus, Eike Vunk, Kadri Runnel","doi":"10.12697/FCE.2018.55.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.12697/FCE.2018.55.08","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000Conservation management for fungi has lagged behind animal and plant conservation, and remains largely restricted to protecting known locations of few conspicuous threatened species. We used Estonian polypores as an example of how conservation options can be systematically screened, based on the Red List of threatened species and in co-operation with practitioners. For a total of 61 species, we identified a broad range of management options representing diverse approaches (site protection; prescriptions of land use; protection of individuals; special management; protection via umbrella species). The results demonstrated the merits of systematic and multi-disciplinary assessments for fungal conservation and setting related research priorities. Our assessment also supported a theoretical expectation that some ecosystem conservation strategies should be explicitly designed based on functionally important groups of fungi. The advancement of fungal conservation appears largely dependent on co-operation between mycologists, conservationists and managers. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Eesti metsade seenestiku looduskaitsevõtted torikseente näitel Seenestiku looduskaitseks kasutatav võttestik on märksa halvemini välja arendatud kui loomade ja taimede puhul ning hõlmab peamiselt silmatorkavate ohustatud liikide leiukohtade kaitset. Töös kirjeldatakse Eesti torikseente näitel, kuidas sobivaid looduskaitsevõtteid saab süstemaatiliselt valida – lähtuvalt ohustatud liikide nimestikust ja koostöös looduskaitsepraktikutega. Kokku eristati 61 ohustatud torikseeneliigi kaitseks lai valik võtteid, mis hõlmasid erinevaid võimalusi alade kaitseks, üldisi maakasutusjuhiseid, isendite kaitset, intensiivseid kaitsevõtteid ja kaitset teiste liikide (katusliikide) kaudu.Tulemused näitavad süstemaatilise ja multidistsiplinaarse analüüsi efektiivsust seente kaitse ja sellega seotud uuringute planeerimisel. Analüüs kinnitas ka teoreetilist, torikseente funktsionaalsest tähtsusest lähtuvat eeldust, et mõned ökosüsteemide kaitse võttestikud tuleks kujundada just seente ökoloogiast lähtuvalt. Seenestiku looduskaitse peamine edenemistingimus paistab niisiis olevat koostöö mükoloogide, looduskaitseteadlaste ja -praktikute vahel. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":39299,"journal":{"name":"Folia Cryptogamica Estonica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.12697/FCE.2018.55.08","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42720769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：