LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH最新文献

In higher education, a need is felt to redesign curricula to better prepare students for the evolving 'world of work'. The current exploratory study investigated first-year (N = 414) students' approaches to learning, well-being and perceptions of their learning environment in the context of an innovative educational concept: design-based education. Also, the relations between these concepts were explored. Regarding the teaching-learning environment, it was found that students experienced peer-support to a large extent whereas alignment in their programs scored lowest. Based on our analysis, it seems that alignment did not influence students' deep approach to learning however, as this approach was predicted by their experienced relevance of the program and feedback from the teachers. Student well-being was predicted by the same elements that also predicted their deep approach of learning, and also alignment appeared to be a significant predictor of well-being. This study provides first insights in students' experiences of an innovative learning environment in higher education and raises important questions for further, longitudinal, research. As the current study already shows that certain aspects of the teaching-learning environment can be used to impact students' learning and well-being, answers can help in (re)designing new learning environments.

Synchronous hybrid learning (SHL) is a new instructional approach that allows on-site and remote students to participate in learning activities simultaneously. Investigating metaphorical perceptions about new learning environments may offer insights into the ways in which they are perceived by various stakeholders. Yet, research is missing a thorough investigation into metaphorical perceptions about hybrid learning environments. Hence, our goal was to determine and compare the metaphorical perceptions of higher education instructors and students regarding their roles in face-to-face versus SHL environments. When asked about SHL, participants were asked to refer separately to the on-site and remote student roles. Following the mixed-methods research design, data were obtained from 210 higher education instructors and students who responded to an online questionnaire during the 2021 academic year. Findings showed that both groups perceived their roles differently in face-to-face versus SHL. For instructors, the "guide" metaphor was replaced with the "juggler" and the "counselor" metaphors. For students, the "audience" metaphor was replaced with different metaphors for each cohort of learners. The on-site students were described as an active audience, while the remote students were described as outsiders or observers. The meaning of these metaphors will be discussed in light of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning in contemporary higher education.

Australia's economic need for innovation has led to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education becoming an essential investment for the future. This study utilised a mixed-methods approach involving a pre-validated quantitative questionnaire together with qualitative semi-structured focus groups with students across four Year 5 classrooms. Students provided their perceptions of their STEM learning environment and their interactions with their teacher to identify factors influencing their engagement for pursuing these disciplines. The questionnaire comprised of scales from three different instruments: Classroom Emotional Climate, Test of Science Related Attitudes, and Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction. Several key factors were identified through student responses, including Student Freedom, Peer Collaboration, Problem Solving, Communication, Time, and Preferred Environments. 33 out of possible 40 correlations between scales were statistically significant, but eta² values were considered low (0.12-0.37). Overall, the students expressed positive perceptions about their STEM learning environment, with Student Freedom, Peer Collaboration, Problem Solving, Communication and Time appearing to impact their perceptions of STEM education. Three focus groups with a total of 12 students identified suggestions for improving STEM learning environments. Implications from this research include the importance of considering student perceptions when measuring the quality of STEM learning environments, as well as how facets of these environments can impact student attitudes towards STEM.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, teachers were forced to move their teaching completely online. While some seized the opportunity to learn and innovate, others experienced difficulties. This study provides insights into the differences between university teachers during the COVID-19 crisis. A survey among university teachers (N = 283) was conducted to investigate their attitudes towards online teaching, beliefs about students' learning, level of stress experienced, self-efficacy and beliefs about their own professional development. Employing a hierarchical cluster analysis, four distinct teacher profiles were found. Profile 1 was critical but eager; Profile 2 was positive but stressed; Profile 3 was critical and reluctant; Profile 4 was optimistic and easy-going. The profiles differed significantly in their use and perception of support. We suggest that teacher education research should carefully consider sampling procedures or take a person-centred research approach and that universities should develop targeted forms of teacher communication, support and policy.