首页 > 最新文献

LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH最新文献

英文 中文
Constructivist learning environment and strategic learning in engineering education 建构主义学习环境与工程教育中的策略性学习
Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-07 DOI: 10.1007/s10984-022-09450-w
Chengcheng Li, Tiberio Garza, Shaoan Zhang, Yingtao Jiang
{"title":"Constructivist learning environment and strategic learning in engineering education","authors":"Chengcheng Li, Tiberio Garza, Shaoan Zhang, Yingtao Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s10984-022-09450-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09450-w","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134902418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What are the key elements of a positive learning environment? Perspectives from students and faculty. 积极学习环境的关键要素是什么?来自学生和教师的观点。
IF 2.9 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10984-022-09410-4
Shayna A Rusticus, Tina Pashootan, Andrea Mah

The learning environment comprises the psychological, social, cultural and physical setting in which learning occurs and has an influence on student motivation and success. The purpose of the present study was to explore qualitatively, from the perspectives of both students and faculty, the key elements of the learning environment that supported and hindered student learning. We recruited a total of 22 students and 9 faculty to participate in either a focus group or an individual interview session about their perceptions of the learning environment at their university. We analyzed the data using a directed content analysis and organized the themes around the three key dimensions of personal development, relationships, and institutional culture. Within each of these dimensions, we identified subthemes that facilitated or impeded student learning and faculty work. We also identified and discussed similarities in subthemes identified by students and faculty.

学习环境包括学习发生的心理、社会、文化和物理环境,并对学生的动机和成功产生影响。本研究的目的是从学生和教师的角度定性地探讨学习环境中支持和阻碍学生学习的关键因素。我们总共招募了22名学生和9名教师参加焦点小组或个人面试,了解他们对大学学习环境的看法。我们使用定向内容分析来分析数据,并围绕个人发展、人际关系和机构文化这三个关键维度来组织主题。在这些维度中,我们确定了促进或阻碍学生学习和教师工作的子主题。我们还确定并讨论了学生和教师确定的子主题的相似之处。
{"title":"What are the key elements of a positive learning environment? Perspectives from students and faculty.","authors":"Shayna A Rusticus,&nbsp;Tina Pashootan,&nbsp;Andrea Mah","doi":"10.1007/s10984-022-09410-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09410-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The learning environment comprises the psychological, social, cultural and physical setting in which learning occurs and has an influence on student motivation and success. The purpose of the present study was to explore qualitatively, from the perspectives of both students and faculty, the key elements of the learning environment that supported and hindered student learning. We recruited a total of 22 students and 9 faculty to participate in either a focus group or an individual interview session about their perceptions of the learning environment at their university. We analyzed the data using a directed content analysis and organized the themes around the three key dimensions of personal development, relationships, and institutional culture. Within each of these dimensions, we identified subthemes that facilitated or impeded student learning and faculty work. We also identified and discussed similarities in subthemes identified by students and faculty.</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":"26 1","pages":"161-175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9076804/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9374829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Physical home learning environments for digitally-supported learning in academic continuing education during COVID-19 pandemic. 在COVID-19大流行期间,为学术继续教育提供数字支持学习的物理家庭学习环境。
IF 2.9 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10984-022-09406-0
Filiz Keser Aschenberger, Gregor Radinger, Sonja Brachtl, Christina Ipser, Stefan Oppl

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, digital technologies for distance learning have been used in educational institutions worldwide, raising issues about social implications, technological development, and teaching and learning strategies. While disparities regarding access to technical equipment and the internet ('the digital divide') have been the subject of previous research, the physical learning environment of learners participating in online learning activities has hardly been investigated. In this study, the physical-spatial conditions of learning environments, including technical equipment for distance learning activities and their influence on adult learners in academic continuing education during initial COVID-19 restrictions, were examined. Data were collected with an online survey sent to all students enrolled in an Austrian continuing education university, together with a small number of semi-structured interviews. A total of 257 students participated in the survey during the 2020 summer semester. Our findings provide insights in two infrequently-studied areas in learning environment research: the physical learning environment for online learning and the learning environment in academic continuing education. The study illustrates that students in academic continuing education have spacious living conditions and almost all the equipment necessary for digitally-supported learning. According to gender and household structure, significant differences were found regarding technical equipment, ergonomic furniture and availability of a dedicated learning place. In their learning sessions during the restrictions, students reported low stress levels and positive well-being. The more that they perceived that their physical learning environment was meeting their needs, the higher were their motivation and well-being and the lower was their stress. Their learning experience was further improved by the extent to which they had a separate and fixed learning place that did not need to be coordinated or shared with others. The study contributes to the literature on creating conducive learning environments for digitally-supported online learning for adult learners.

自2020年2019冠状病毒病大流行爆发以来,远程教育的数字技术已在世界各地的教育机构中使用,引发了有关社会影响、技术发展和教学策略的问题。虽然在获取技术设备和互联网方面的差异(“数字鸿沟”)一直是先前研究的主题,但参与在线学习活动的学习者的物理学习环境几乎没有被调查过。在这项研究中,研究了学习环境的物理空间条件,包括远程学习活动的技术设备,以及它们在初始COVID-19限制期间对学术继续教育成人学习者的影响。数据是通过向奥地利一所继续教育大学的所有学生发送在线调查以及少量半结构化访谈来收集的。在2020年夏季学期,共有257名学生参与了调查。我们的研究结果为学习环境研究中两个很少被研究的领域提供了见解:在线学习的物理学习环境和学术继续教育的学习环境。研究表明,学术继续教育的学生拥有宽敞的生活条件和几乎所有数字化支持学习所需的设备。根据性别和家庭结构,在技术设备、符合人体工程学的家具和专门学习场所的可用性方面存在显著差异。在限制期间的学习过程中,学生们报告压力水平较低,幸福感较好。他们越觉得自己的物理学习环境能满足他们的需要,他们的动机和幸福感就越高,压力就越小。他们有一个独立的固定的学习场所,不需要与他人协调或共享,这进一步改善了他们的学习体验。该研究有助于为成人学习者创造有利于数字化支持在线学习的学习环境的文献。
{"title":"Physical home learning environments for digitally-supported learning in academic continuing education during COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Filiz Keser Aschenberger,&nbsp;Gregor Radinger,&nbsp;Sonja Brachtl,&nbsp;Christina Ipser,&nbsp;Stefan Oppl","doi":"10.1007/s10984-022-09406-0","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09406-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, digital technologies for distance learning have been used in educational institutions worldwide, raising issues about social implications, technological development, and teaching and learning strategies. While disparities regarding access to technical equipment and the internet ('the digital divide') have been the subject of previous research, the physical learning environment of learners participating in online learning activities has hardly been investigated. In this study, the physical-spatial conditions of learning environments, including technical equipment for distance learning activities and their influence on adult learners in academic continuing education during initial COVID-19 restrictions, were examined. Data were collected with an online survey sent to all students enrolled in an Austrian continuing education university, together with a small number of semi-structured interviews. A total of 257 students participated in the survey during the 2020 summer semester. Our findings provide insights in two infrequently-studied areas in learning environment research: the physical learning environment for online learning and the learning environment in academic continuing education. The study illustrates that students in academic continuing education have spacious living conditions and almost all the equipment necessary for digitally-supported learning. According to gender and household structure, significant differences were found regarding technical equipment, ergonomic furniture and availability of a dedicated learning place. In their learning sessions during the restrictions, students reported low stress levels and positive well-being. The more that they perceived that their physical learning environment was meeting their needs, the higher were their motivation and well-being and the lower was their stress. Their learning experience was further improved by the extent to which they had a separate and fixed learning place that did not need to be coordinated or shared with others. The study contributes to the literature on creating conducive learning environments for digitally-supported online learning for adult learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":"26 1","pages":"97-128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8867450/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10829234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Distance learning environment: perspective of Italian primary and secondary teachers during COVID-19 pandemic. 远程学习环境:新冠肺炎大流行期间意大利中小学教师的视角。
IF 2.9 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-27 DOI: 10.1007/s10984-022-09451-9
Eleonora Doz, Alessandro Cuder, Marcella Caputi, Sandra Pellizzoni, Maria Chiara Passolunghi

School closures because of the COVID-19 emergency forced a rapid transition to distance learning worldwide. In this study, we investigated teachers' experiences with distance learning during the first Italian lockdown. A sample of 270 primary and secondary teachers answered a semi-structured questionnaire administered between April and May 2020. Didactic modalities, students' and teachers' difficulties with distance learning, and teachers' feelings during school closure were investigated through open-ended questions. Content analysis indicated that most teachers adopted both synchronous and asynchronous modalities, which resembled the traditional classroom learning environment. Moreover, technological weaknesses (lack of proper digital equipment and poor digital skills) and lack of interactions appeared to be the main threats to the quality of distance learning. The implementation of distance learning in primary schools emerged as more challenging than in secondary education. Furthermore, most teachers experienced negative feelings during online teaching. However, 13% of the sample reported a sense of resilience and opportunity. Particularly, older teachers reported more resilience compared with younger teachers, indicating the importance of experience in managing stressful teaching events. Overall, findings suggest that-in this novel educational environment-teachers' role has changed significantly, placing strong emphasis on the ability to encourage communication, discussion, and contact with students. Future work should focus on how information and communications technology could sustain meaningful interactions between students and teachers, especially in primary education.

新冠肺炎紧急情况导致学校关闭,迫使全球迅速过渡到远程学习。在这项研究中,我们调查了意大利第一次封锁期间教师的远程学习经历。270名中小学教师的样本回答了2020年4月至5月期间进行的半结构化问卷。通过开放式问题调查教学模式、学生和教师的远程学习困难以及教师在学校关闭期间的感受。内容分析表明,大多数教师采用同步和异步两种模式,这与传统的课堂学习环境相似。此外,技术弱点(缺乏适当的数字设备和糟糕的数字技能)和缺乏互动似乎是远程学习质量的主要威胁。在小学实施远程教育比在中学实施远程教育更具挑战性。此外,大多数教师在网上教学中都有负面情绪。然而,13%的样本表示有韧性和机会感。特别是,与年轻教师相比,年长教师表现出更强的应变能力,这表明经验在管理压力教学事件方面的重要性。总体而言,研究结果表明,在这种新的教育环境中,教师的角色发生了重大变化,更加强调鼓励与学生沟通、讨论和接触的能力。未来的工作应侧重于信息和通信技术如何维持学生和教师之间有意义的互动,特别是在小学教育中。
{"title":"Distance learning environment: perspective of Italian primary and secondary teachers during COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Eleonora Doz,&nbsp;Alessandro Cuder,&nbsp;Marcella Caputi,&nbsp;Sandra Pellizzoni,&nbsp;Maria Chiara Passolunghi","doi":"10.1007/s10984-022-09451-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10984-022-09451-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>School closures because of the COVID-19 emergency forced a rapid transition to distance learning worldwide. In this study, we investigated teachers' experiences with distance learning during the first Italian lockdown. A sample of 270 primary and secondary teachers answered a semi-structured questionnaire administered between April and May 2020. Didactic modalities, students' and teachers' difficulties with distance learning, and teachers' feelings during school closure were investigated through open-ended questions. Content analysis indicated that most teachers adopted both synchronous and asynchronous modalities, which resembled the traditional classroom learning environment. Moreover, technological weaknesses (lack of proper digital equipment and poor digital skills) and lack of interactions appeared to be the main threats to the quality of distance learning. The implementation of distance learning in primary schools emerged as more challenging than in secondary education. Furthermore, most teachers experienced negative feelings during online teaching. However, 13% of the sample reported a sense of resilience and opportunity. Particularly, older teachers reported more resilience compared with younger teachers, indicating the importance of experience in managing stressful teaching events. Overall, findings suggest that-in this novel educational environment-teachers' role has changed significantly, placing strong emphasis on the ability to encourage communication, discussion, and contact with students. Future work should focus on how information and communications technology could sustain meaningful interactions between students and teachers, especially in primary education.</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":"26 2","pages":"555-571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9793392/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9512155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Correction to: Physical home learning environments for digitally‑supported learning in academic continuing education during COVID‑19 pandemic. 更正:COVID - 19大流行期间为学术继续教育提供数字支持学习的物理家庭学习环境。
IF 2.9 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10984-022-09412-2
Filiz Keser Aschenberger, Gregor Radinger, Sonja Brachtl, Christina Ipser, Stefan Oppl

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s10984-022-09406-0.].

[这更正了文章DOI: 10.1007/s10984-022-09406-0.]。
{"title":"Correction to: Physical home learning environments for digitally‑supported learning in academic continuing education during COVID‑19 pandemic.","authors":"Filiz Keser Aschenberger,&nbsp;Gregor Radinger,&nbsp;Sonja Brachtl,&nbsp;Christina Ipser,&nbsp;Stefan Oppl","doi":"10.1007/s10984-022-09412-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09412-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s10984-022-09406-0.].</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":"26 1","pages":"311-313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9215320/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10829536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
HyFlex environment: addressing students' basic psychological needs. HyFlex环境:满足学生的基本心理需求。
IF 2.9 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10984-022-09431-z
Nathan Mentzer, Bhawna Krishna, Ankita Kotangale, Lakshmy Mohandas

Active learning strategies engage students and promote student-centered learning environments. Implementing active learning in a HyFlex environment during the Fall of 2020 global pandemic was challenging. We describe the Interactive Synchronous HyFlex approach to teaching design thinking at the introductory college level and explore impacts on students' basic psychological needs, including autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Aligned with Self-Determination Theory, active learning has been shown to motivate students and increase performance and retention in science, engineering, and mathematics disciplines, among others (Freeman et al., 2014; Lo & Hew, 2019). In active environments, the predominant mode of instruction is not lecture based and it engages students through student-to-student interactions and student-to-instructor interactions. The flipped classroom is a pedagogical model in which the typical lecture and homework elements of a course are reversed. This model of instruction is ideal for our design thinking course used as a context for this study because students are challenged to learn by doing. In active learning courses, students engage in video-recorded lectures or talks, text-based materials and online quizzes, or other preparation activities before and in preparation for class (Bishop & Verleger, 2013; Lo et al., 2017; O'Flaherty & Phillips, 2015). Scheduled class meeting time is used for engagement and interaction between students informed by a social constructivist learning theory. Students challenge each other to apply what they have learned with guidance and support from the instructor.

主动学习策略吸引学生,促进以学生为中心的学习环境。在2020年秋季全球大流行期间,在HyFlex环境中实施主动学习具有挑战性。我们描述了交互式同步HyFlex方法在大学初级阶段的设计思维教学,并探讨了对学生基本心理需求的影响,包括自主性、能力和相关性。与自我决定理论相一致,主动学习已被证明可以激励学生,提高科学、工程和数学学科的表现和记忆力(Freeman等人,2014;Lo & Hew, 2019)。在主动环境中,主要的教学模式不是基于讲座,而是通过学生与学生之间的互动和学生与教师之间的互动来吸引学生。翻转课堂是一种教学模式,在这种教学模式中,课程中典型的讲课和作业元素被颠倒了。这种教学模式非常适合我们的设计思维课程,作为本研究的背景,因为学生们面临着从实践中学习的挑战。在主动学习课程中,学生在课前和备课过程中参与视频讲座或讲座、文本材料和在线测验或其他准备活动(Bishop & Verleger, 2013;Lo et al., 2017;O'Flaherty & Phillips, 2015)。在社会建构主义学习理论的指导下,预定的课堂时间用于学生之间的参与和互动。学生们互相挑战,在老师的指导和支持下应用他们所学到的知识。
{"title":"HyFlex environment: addressing students' basic psychological needs.","authors":"Nathan Mentzer,&nbsp;Bhawna Krishna,&nbsp;Ankita Kotangale,&nbsp;Lakshmy Mohandas","doi":"10.1007/s10984-022-09431-z","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09431-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Active learning strategies engage students and promote student-centered learning environments. Implementing active learning in a HyFlex environment during the Fall of 2020 global pandemic was challenging. We describe the <i>Interactive Synchronous HyFlex</i> approach to teaching design thinking at the introductory college level and explore impacts on students' basic psychological needs, including autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Aligned with Self-Determination Theory, active learning has been shown to motivate students and increase performance and retention in science, engineering, and mathematics disciplines, among others (Freeman et al., 2014; Lo & Hew, 2019). In active environments, the predominant mode of instruction is not lecture based and it engages students through student-to-student interactions and student-to-instructor interactions. The flipped classroom is a pedagogical model in which the typical lecture and homework elements of a course are reversed. This model of instruction is ideal for our design thinking course used as a context for this study because students are challenged to learn by doing. In active learning courses, students engage in video-recorded lectures or talks, text-based materials and online quizzes, or other preparation activities before and in preparation for class (Bishop & Verleger, 2013; Lo et al., 2017; O'Flaherty & Phillips, 2015). Scheduled class meeting time is used for engagement and interaction between students informed by a social constructivist learning theory. Students challenge each other to apply what they have learned with guidance and support from the instructor.</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":"26 1","pages":"271-289"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614739/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10835316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Gender-sensitive sentiment analysis for estimating the emotional climate in online teacher education. 基于性别敏感的情感分析评估在线教师教育中的情感氛围。
IF 2.9 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI: 10.1007/s10984-022-09405-1
Mireia Usart, Carme Grimalt-Álvaro, Adolf Maria Iglesias-Estradé

Teacher training takes place in distance education to a large extent. Within these contexts, trainers should make use of all the information available to adapt and refine their instructional methods during the training process. Sentiment analysis (SA) can give immediate feedback of the emotions expressed and help in the training process, although it has been used infrequently in educational settings, slow to assess, and bound to interpretative issues, such as gender bias. This research aimed to design and evaluate a SA gender-sensitive method as a proxy to characterize the emotional climate of teacher trainees in an online course. An explanatory case study with mixed methods was implemented among students of the Interuniversity Master of Educational Technologies (N = 48). Participants' messages were analyzed and correlated with learning achievement and, along with a qualitative study of participants' satisfaction with the Master's degree, to validate the effectiveness of the method. Results show that sentiment expression cannot be used to exactly predict participants' achievement, but it can guide trainers to foresee how participants will broadly act in a learning task and, in consequence, use SA results for tuning and improving the quality of the guidance during the course. Gender differences found in our study support gendered patterns related to the emotional climate, with female participants posting more negative messages than their counterparts. Last but not least, the design of well-adjusted teaching-learning sequences with appropriate scaffolding can contribute to building a positive climate in the online learning environment.

教师培训在很大程度上是在远程教育中进行的。在这种情况下,培训人员应利用现有的一切资料,在培训过程中调整和改进其教学方法。情绪分析(SA)可以对表达的情绪提供即时反馈,并在培训过程中提供帮助,尽管它在教育环境中很少使用,评估缓慢,并且与性别偏见等解释性问题有关。本研究旨在设计并评估一种SA性别敏感方法,作为表征在线课程中教师培训生情绪气候的代理。采用混合方法对校际教育技术硕士学生进行了解释性案例研究(N = 48)。对参与者的信息进行分析,并将其与学习成绩相关联,同时对参与者对硕士学位的满意度进行定性研究,以验证该方法的有效性。结果表明,情绪表达不能用于准确预测参与者的成就,但它可以指导培训师预见参与者在学习任务中的广泛行为,因此,在课程中使用情景分析结果来调整和提高指导质量。在我们的研究中发现的性别差异支持了与情绪气候相关的性别模式,女性参与者比他们的同行发布了更多的负面信息。最后但并非最不重要的是,通过适当的脚手架设计调整良好的教学序列可以有助于在在线学习环境中建立积极的氛围。
{"title":"Gender-sensitive sentiment analysis for estimating the emotional climate in online teacher education.","authors":"Mireia Usart,&nbsp;Carme Grimalt-Álvaro,&nbsp;Adolf Maria Iglesias-Estradé","doi":"10.1007/s10984-022-09405-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09405-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Teacher training takes place in distance education to a large extent. Within these contexts, trainers should make use of all the information available to adapt and refine their instructional methods during the training process. Sentiment analysis (SA) can give immediate feedback of the emotions expressed and help in the training process, although it has been used infrequently in educational settings, slow to assess, and bound to interpretative issues, such as gender bias. This research aimed to design and evaluate a SA gender-sensitive method as a proxy to characterize the emotional climate of teacher trainees in an online course. An explanatory case study with mixed methods was implemented among students of the Interuniversity Master of Educational Technologies (<i>N</i> = 48). Participants' messages were analyzed and correlated with learning achievement and, along with a qualitative study of participants' satisfaction with the Master's degree, to validate the effectiveness of the method. Results show that sentiment expression cannot be used to exactly predict participants' achievement, but it can guide trainers to foresee how participants will broadly act in a learning task and, in consequence, use SA results for tuning and improving the quality of the guidance during the course. Gender differences found in our study support gendered patterns related to the emotional climate, with female participants posting more negative messages than their counterparts. Last but not least, the design of well-adjusted teaching-learning sequences with appropriate scaffolding can contribute to building a positive climate in the online learning environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":"26 1","pages":"77-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8804077/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9374809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Exemplification process in online education: a longitudinal study of mathematics teachers. 网络教育中的例证过程:对数学教师的纵向研究。
IF 2.9 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-28 DOI: 10.1007/s10984-022-09440-y
Eyüp Sevimli

The examples used in the teaching-learning process of mathematics have a crucial role in fostering conceptual understanding, and some variables can affect instructors' qualified example usage. This longterm study focused on mathematics teachers' exemplification process in face-to-face and online learning environments. In this regard, the change in examples used by mathematics teachers were evaluated in terms of content preparation and presentation during the shift from face-to-face lectures to online classes. A longitudinal design was used in the study and the teaching processes of 14 middle-school mathematics teachers were observed over two semesters. Observation notes, course documents, and semi-structured interview data were analyzed, and content analysis findings were presented through descriptive statistics in order to compare content preferences in two different learning environments. The use of worked examples decreased, while the use of conceptual examples increased with the shift from face-to-face lectures to online classes. Also the length of time devoted to examples in online classes decreased, and examples were more teacher-centered. The interview revealed that mathematics teachers need support in terms of example preparation and presentation aspects in online learning environments. The other technological-pedagogical competencies that teachers might need to choose qualified examples in different teaching-learning environments are discussed in the light of relevant literature.

数学教学过程中使用的例子在培养概念理解方面起着至关重要的作用,一些变量会影响教师合格的例子使用。这项长期研究的重点是数学教师在面对面和在线学习环境中的示范过程。在这方面,在从面对面授课向在线课堂转变的过程中,从内容准备和演示方面评估了数学教师使用的例子的变化。本研究采用纵向设计,对14名中学数学教师的教学过程进行了为期两个学期的观察。分析了观察笔记、课程文档和半结构化访谈数据,并通过描述性统计呈现了内容分析结果,以比较两种不同学习环境中的内容偏好。随着从面对面授课到在线课堂的转变,工作示例的使用减少,而概念示例的使用增加。此外,在线课堂上花在示例上的时间减少了,并且示例更加以教师为中心。采访显示,数学教师在在线学习环境中需要在示例准备和演示方面得到支持。根据相关文献,讨论了教师在不同的教学环境中选择合格范例所需的其他技术教学能力。
{"title":"Exemplification process in online education: a longitudinal study of mathematics teachers.","authors":"Eyüp Sevimli","doi":"10.1007/s10984-022-09440-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10984-022-09440-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The examples used in the teaching-learning process of mathematics have a crucial role in fostering conceptual understanding, and some variables can affect instructors' qualified example usage. This longterm study focused on mathematics teachers' exemplification process in face-to-face and online learning environments. In this regard, the change in examples used by mathematics teachers were evaluated in terms of content preparation and presentation during the shift from face-to-face lectures to online classes. A longitudinal design was used in the study and the teaching processes of 14 middle-school mathematics teachers were observed over two semesters. Observation notes, course documents, and semi-structured interview data were analyzed, and content analysis findings were presented through descriptive statistics in order to compare content preferences in two different learning environments. The use of worked examples decreased, while the use of conceptual examples increased with the shift from face-to-face lectures to online classes. Also the length of time devoted to examples in online classes decreased, and examples were more teacher-centered. The interview revealed that mathematics teachers need support in terms of example preparation and presentation aspects in online learning environments. The other technological-pedagogical competencies that teachers might need to choose qualified examples in different teaching-learning environments are discussed in the light of relevant literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":"26 2","pages":"491-514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707127/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9514306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Development and validation of the online learning process questionnaire (OLPQ) at home for primary-school children and their caregivers. 为小学生及其照顾者开发和验证家庭在线学习过程问卷(OLPQ)。
IF 2.9 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-06 DOI: 10.1007/s10984-022-09443-9
Joseph Hin Yan Lam, Shelley Xiuli Tong

Despite the increasing use of virtual modalities in schools since the COVID-19 pandemic, no systematic tools exist to evaluate the process of online learning. We developed and validated an Online Learning Process Questionnaire (OLPQ) for assessing online at-home learning among 219 Hong Kong primary-school students and 474 caregivers. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of caregivers' data classified the 58-item OLPQ into 11 subscales: (1) learning aims, (2) environmental structuring, (3) learning environment, (4) time management, (5) engagement in learning activities, (6) persistence, (7) interaction between teachers and students, (8) interaction among students, (9) feedback from the interface, (10) application of learning, and (11) meaning of learning under three learning phases. Confirmatory factor analysis of students' data further categorized the 11-subscale framework into three learning phases: preparatory, performance, and transfer. The OLPQ demonstrated excellent reliability and discriminant validity across caregiver (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98) and student samples (alpha = 0.98). These findings indicate that the OLPQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the online at-home learning process among both students and their caregivers.

尽管自新冠肺炎大流行以来,虚拟模式在学校的使用越来越多,但没有系统的工具来评估在线学习的过程。我们开发并验证了在线学习过程问卷(OLPQ),用于评估219名香港小学生和474名护理人员的在线家庭学习。对照顾者数据的探索性和验证性因素分析将58项OLPQ分为11个分量表:(1)学习目标,(2)环境结构,(3)学习环境,(4)时间管理,(5)参与学习活动,(6)坚持性,(7)教师和学生之间的互动,(8)学生之间的交互,(9)界面反馈,(10)学习的应用和(11)三个学习阶段下的学习意义。对学生数据的验证性因素分析进一步将11个分量表框架分为三个学习阶段:准备阶段、表现阶段和迁移阶段。OLPQ在护理人员中表现出良好的可靠性和判别有效性(Cronbachα = 0.98)和学生样本(α = 0.98)。这些发现表明,OLPQ是评估学生及其照顾者在线家庭学习过程的有效和可靠的工具。
{"title":"Development and validation of the online learning process questionnaire (OLPQ) at home for primary-school children and their caregivers.","authors":"Joseph Hin Yan Lam,&nbsp;Shelley Xiuli Tong","doi":"10.1007/s10984-022-09443-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10984-022-09443-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the increasing use of virtual modalities in schools since the COVID-19 pandemic, no systematic tools exist to evaluate the process of online learning. We developed and validated an Online Learning Process Questionnaire (OLPQ) for assessing online at-home learning among 219 Hong Kong primary-school students and 474 caregivers. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of caregivers' data classified the 58-item OLPQ into 11 subscales: (1) learning aims, (2) environmental structuring, (3) learning environment, (4) time management, (5) engagement in learning activities, (6) persistence, (7) interaction between teachers and students, (8) interaction among students, (9) feedback from the interface, (10) application of learning, and (11) meaning of learning under three learning phases. Confirmatory factor analysis of students' data further categorized the 11-subscale framework into three learning phases: preparatory, performance, and transfer. The OLPQ demonstrated excellent reliability and discriminant validity across caregiver (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98) and student samples (alpha = 0.98). These findings indicate that the OLPQ is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the online at-home learning process among both students and their caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":"26 2","pages":"515-538"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9734829/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9514317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparison of the university mathematics learning environment with its high school equivalent. 大学数学学习环境与高中数学学习环境的比较。
IF 2.9 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-12 DOI: 10.1007/s10984-022-09435-9
Peter Klosterman, Stephen Stein

In light of rising college student debt, many states now offer multiple options for students to earn college credit while still in high school. Concurrent enrollment programs, which allow qualified high school teachers to teach college credit-bearing classes in the high school, are one such option. Because concurrent enrollment classes teach college-level material at college-level rigor, they offer an ideal way to compare the secondary and tertiary learning environments across identical academic expectations. This study sought to compare the university mathematics environment with its concurrent enrollment counterpart. The WIHIC was found to be valid and reliable for the university population. The comparison of 242 students in university classrooms with 260 students in concurrent enrollment classrooms revealed a statistical difference, with the concurrent enrollment setting scoring higher in Involvement, Teacher Support, and Student Cohesion and the university setting scoring higher in Task Orientation. This implies that earning college credit in a secondary setting is a viable, and possibly even preferable, alternative to earning it in a university setting. We examine the discrepancy in scores-particularly the large discrepancy in Task Orientation-and discuss the benefit of the flipped classroom as one path to improving the university learning environment.

鉴于大学生债务不断增加,许多州现在为学生在高中时获得大学学分提供了多种选择。同时招生计划就是这样一种选择,它允许合格的高中教师在高中教授大学学分课程。由于同时招生的课程以大学水平的严谨性教授大学水平的材料,因此它们提供了一种理想的方式来比较相同学术期望下的中学和大学学习环境。本研究试图将大学数学环境与其同期招生环境进行比较。WIHIC被发现对大学人群是有效和可靠的。对242名大学课堂学生和260名同期招生课堂学生的比较显示出统计学差异,同期招生环境在参与、教师支持和学生凝聚力方面得分较高,而大学环境在任务定向方面得分较高。这意味着,在中学环境中获得大学学分是一种可行的,甚至可能更可取的选择,而不是在大学环境中获得学分。我们研究了分数的差异,特别是任务定向的巨大差异,并讨论了翻转课堂作为改善大学学习环境的一种途径的好处。
{"title":"A comparison of the university mathematics learning environment with its high school equivalent.","authors":"Peter Klosterman,&nbsp;Stephen Stein","doi":"10.1007/s10984-022-09435-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s10984-022-09435-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In light of rising college student debt, many states now offer multiple options for students to earn college credit while still in high school. Concurrent enrollment programs, which allow qualified high school teachers to teach college credit-bearing classes in the high school, are one such option. Because concurrent enrollment classes teach college-level material at college-level rigor, they offer an ideal way to compare the secondary and tertiary learning environments across identical academic expectations. This study sought to compare the university mathematics environment with its concurrent enrollment counterpart. The WIHIC was found to be valid and reliable for the university population. The comparison of 242 students in university classrooms with 260 students in concurrent enrollment classrooms revealed a statistical difference, with the concurrent enrollment setting scoring higher in Involvement, Teacher Support, and Student Cohesion and the university setting scoring higher in Task Orientation. This implies that earning college credit in a secondary setting is a viable, and possibly even preferable, alternative to earning it in a university setting. We examine the discrepancy in scores-particularly the large discrepancy in Task Orientation-and discuss the benefit of the flipped classroom as one path to improving the university learning environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":"26 2","pages":"361-378"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660151/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9517360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1