{"title":"Güney Doğu Avrupa’da Şiddet İçeren Aşırılığa İten Güçler – Kuzey Makedoniya Bağlamı","authors":"Besa Arifi","doi":"10.26650/JPLC2019-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2019-0011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":40112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2019-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86502616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reexamining the Age-Misconduct Curve: Interaction Effects of Sex and Race/Ethnicity","authors":"Colby L. Valentine","doi":"10.26650/JPLC2018-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2018-0006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":40112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79617221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bu calisma otonom araclar olarak adlandirilan yapay zekâ iceren araclarin kullanimindan dogabilecek olasi ceza hukuku problemlerinin Turk Ceza Hukuku cercevesinde genel olarak degerlendirilmesi ve hukukumuzda daha once ele alinmamis bir konuyu tartismaya acma amaci tasimaktadir. Calismada oncelikle otonom araclarin neyi ifade ettigi ve hem cesitli ulkeler hem de kuruluslar tarafindan yayinlanan ilke ve duzenlemeler cercevesinde bunlarin kademeleri saptanmistir. Daha sonra ise otonom araclarin ceza hukuku sorumluluklarinin olup olamayacagi tartisilarak Turk Ceza hukuku bakimindan bunun mumkun olmayacagi kanaatine varilmis ve bu baglamda sorumlulugu gundeme gelebilecek olan suruculer ve kullanicilar bakimindan konu ele alinmistir. Bu baglamda otonom arac surucu ve kullanicilarinin kasten veya taksirle islenen suclar bakimindan ceza sorumluluklarinin belirlenmesinin genel ilkelerden ayrilmayi gerektirip gerektirmeyecegi incelenmistir. Kasten islenen suclar bakimindan bir ozellik saptanmazken, taksirli suclar bakimindan dikkat ve ozen yukumlulugune iliskin kurallar ile ongorulebilirlik kriterlerinin detayli bir sekilde arastirilmasi gerektigi sonucuna varilmistir.
{"title":"Criminal Responsibility Arising From Usage of Autonomos Vehicles: A General Review in the context of Turkish Penal Law","authors":"Tuba Kelep Pekmez","doi":"10.26650/jplc2018-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/jplc2018-0004","url":null,"abstract":"Bu calisma otonom araclar olarak adlandirilan yapay zekâ iceren araclarin kullanimindan dogabilecek olasi ceza hukuku problemlerinin Turk Ceza Hukuku cercevesinde genel olarak degerlendirilmesi ve hukukumuzda daha once ele alinmamis bir konuyu tartismaya acma amaci tasimaktadir. Calismada oncelikle otonom araclarin neyi ifade ettigi ve hem cesitli ulkeler hem de kuruluslar tarafindan yayinlanan ilke ve duzenlemeler cercevesinde bunlarin kademeleri saptanmistir. Daha sonra ise otonom araclarin ceza hukuku sorumluluklarinin olup olamayacagi tartisilarak Turk Ceza hukuku bakimindan bunun mumkun olmayacagi kanaatine varilmis ve bu baglamda sorumlulugu gundeme gelebilecek olan suruculer ve kullanicilar bakimindan konu ele alinmistir. Bu baglamda otonom arac surucu ve kullanicilarinin kasten veya taksirle islenen suclar bakimindan ceza sorumluluklarinin belirlenmesinin genel ilkelerden ayrilmayi gerektirip gerektirmeyecegi incelenmistir. Kasten islenen suclar bakimindan bir ozellik saptanmazken, taksirli suclar bakimindan dikkat ve ozen yukumlulugune iliskin kurallar ile ongorulebilirlik kriterlerinin detayli bir sekilde arastirilmasi gerektigi sonucuna varilmistir.","PeriodicalId":40112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85550005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
That the individual shall have full protection in person and in property is a core principle of a reasonable life. In some societies this principle is ignored in different ways. At times, government brings some security excuses. “In these societies, the old forms of the right to privacy are seldom known by people, let alone the new forms.” Despite kinds of inattention in these societies, we can see some aspects of the right to privacy, we can see people that pay attention to this right. They respect this right and try to develop its concept. They are trying to get some sanctions for its infringement. So, it has been found necessary from time to time to redefine the exact nature and extent of such protections. Political, social, and economic changes entail the recognition of new rights. So, gradually, the scope of these rights has broadened; and now the right to life has come to mean the right to enjoy life. The right to safety and the right to liberty secure the exercise of extensive civil privileges. The present paper, which uses an analytical method, considers the situation of Iranian criminal justice.
{"title":"The Right to Privacy in the Iranian Criminal Justice System","authors":"M. Rahmdel","doi":"10.26650/JPLC2018-0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2018-0007","url":null,"abstract":"That the individual shall have full protection in person and in property is a core principle of a reasonable life. In some societies this principle is ignored in different ways. At times, government brings some security excuses. “In these societies, the old forms of the right to privacy are seldom known by people, let alone the new forms.” Despite kinds of inattention in these societies, we can see some aspects of the right to privacy, we can see people that pay attention to this right. They respect this right and try to develop its concept. They are trying to get some sanctions for its infringement. So, it has been found necessary from time to time to redefine the exact nature and extent of such protections. Political, social, and economic changes entail the recognition of new rights. So, gradually, the scope of these rights has broadened; and now the right to life has come to mean the right to enjoy life. The right to safety and the right to liberty secure the exercise of extensive civil privileges. The present paper, which uses an analytical method, considers the situation of Iranian criminal justice.","PeriodicalId":40112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80516194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Musterek hukuk sistemleri Kita Avrupasi hukuk sistemlerinden sorusturmanin ve yargilamanin nasil ve kim tarafindan yurutulmesi konusunda ve delillere iliskin kurallar bakimindan temel bir sekilde farklilik gosterir. Musterek hukuk sistemlerinde itham usulu (adversarial) ceza yargisinin esasini olustururken Kita Avrupasi’nda tahkik (inquisitorial) sistemi benimsenmistir. Ancak bu iki hukuk geleneginin ispat ve delil hukuklarindaki yakinlasma bugun icin ‘adversarial-inquisitorial’ kavramsallastirmasinin ceza yargilamasi modellerini aciklamak icin kullanilamayacagini gosteriyor. Mezkur iki kavram yalnizca hukuk sistemlerinin geleneksel olarak farklilik gosteren ozelliklerini izah edebilir. En iyi ihtimalle, muhkem hukuk geleneklerinin yargilamanin sujeleri uzerindeki etkisini anlamaya yardimci olabilir. Bu makalenin amaci iki farkli hukuk sisteminde var olan o ulkeye munhasir unsurlara bakarak ‘adversarial-inquisitorial’ dikotomisini kavramak icin bir temel olusturmak ve bu dogrultuda Ingiliz ve Turk ceza yargilamalarinin delile iliskin kurallarini incelemektir.
{"title":"The Analytical Value of the Adversarial-Inquisitorial Dichotomy in Approaches to Proof: The Examples of England and Turkey","authors":"Halil Cesur","doi":"10.26650/JPLC2018-0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC2018-0008","url":null,"abstract":"Musterek hukuk sistemleri Kita Avrupasi hukuk sistemlerinden sorusturmanin ve yargilamanin nasil ve kim tarafindan yurutulmesi konusunda ve delillere iliskin kurallar bakimindan temel bir sekilde farklilik gosterir. Musterek hukuk sistemlerinde itham usulu (adversarial) ceza yargisinin esasini olustururken Kita Avrupasi’nda tahkik (inquisitorial) sistemi benimsenmistir. Ancak bu iki hukuk geleneginin ispat ve delil hukuklarindaki yakinlasma bugun icin ‘adversarial-inquisitorial’ kavramsallastirmasinin ceza yargilamasi modellerini aciklamak icin kullanilamayacagini gosteriyor. Mezkur iki kavram yalnizca hukuk sistemlerinin geleneksel olarak farklilik gosteren ozelliklerini izah edebilir. En iyi ihtimalle, muhkem hukuk geleneklerinin yargilamanin sujeleri uzerindeki etkisini anlamaya yardimci olabilir. Bu makalenin amaci iki farkli hukuk sisteminde var olan o ulkeye munhasir unsurlara bakarak ‘adversarial-inquisitorial’ dikotomisini kavramak icin bir temel olusturmak ve bu dogrultuda Ingiliz ve Turk ceza yargilamalarinin delile iliskin kurallarini incelemektir.","PeriodicalId":40112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75732729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bu calisma, idare tarafindan kamu duzeninin saglanmasi gerekcesiyle toplanti ve gosteri yuruyusu duzenlemelerinin yasaklanmasina ragmen bazi sivil toplum kuruluslarinin onculugundeki bir grubun izinsiz olarak eylem yapmasi sonucu ortaya cikan ihtilaflarin, Anayasa Mahkemesi Bireysel Basvuru yolundaki surec ve sonuclari uzerine bir degerlendirmeyi icermektedir. Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin onune gelen Bireysel Basvuruda, izinsiz olarak duzenlenen ve kolluk gucleri tarafindan sonlandirilmaya calisilan eylemler esnasinda yasanan arbedelerde yaralanan bazi gostericilerin, kotu muameleye maruz kaldiklari ve toplanti ve gosteri yuruyusu haklarinin ihlal edildigi iddialari gundeme gelmektedir. Bazi gostericiler tarafindan yasanan olaylara iliskin dava acilmis ancak ilgililer hakkinda sorusturma izni verilmediginden dolayi uyusmazligin esasi hakkinda bir yargilama yapilamamistir. Bunun uzerine Anayasa Mahkemesine basvuru yapan gostericiler, Kolluk guclerinin orantisiz guc kullandigini ve bunlar hakkinda etkin bir sorusturma yapilmadigini iddia ederek Anayasal bir hak olan kisinin maddi ve manevi butunlugunun korunmasi, dusunce ve kanaat hurriyeti ile toplanti ve gosteri yuruyusu duzenleme haklarinin ihlal edildigini ileri surmuslerdir. Anayasa Mahkemesi, basvurucularin gosteriler esnasinda islemis olduklari fiiller uzerinden bir degerlendirme yapmak suretiyle karar vermistir. Nitekim Yuksek Mahkeme, bazi gostericiler hakkinda kolluk guclerine karsi mukavemet gosterdiklerinden bahisle bir hak ihlali olusmadigi kanaatine varirken bazilari hakkinda ise kolluk guclerinin mudahalesini gerektiren bir eylemlerinin bulunmadigi gerekcesiyle hak ihlali olduguna karar vermistir.
{"title":"The Use of the Power of the Police Versus the Right of Meeting and Demonstration Marches and Prohibition of Mistreatment","authors":"Eren Solmaz","doi":"10.26650/jplc432781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/jplc432781","url":null,"abstract":"Bu calisma, idare tarafindan kamu duzeninin saglanmasi gerekcesiyle toplanti ve gosteri yuruyusu duzenlemelerinin yasaklanmasina ragmen bazi sivil toplum kuruluslarinin onculugundeki bir grubun izinsiz olarak eylem yapmasi sonucu ortaya cikan ihtilaflarin, Anayasa Mahkemesi Bireysel Basvuru yolundaki surec ve sonuclari uzerine bir degerlendirmeyi icermektedir. Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin onune gelen Bireysel Basvuruda, izinsiz olarak duzenlenen ve kolluk gucleri tarafindan sonlandirilmaya calisilan eylemler esnasinda yasanan arbedelerde yaralanan bazi gostericilerin, kotu muameleye maruz kaldiklari ve toplanti ve gosteri yuruyusu haklarinin ihlal edildigi iddialari gundeme gelmektedir. Bazi gostericiler tarafindan yasanan olaylara iliskin dava acilmis ancak ilgililer hakkinda sorusturma izni verilmediginden dolayi uyusmazligin esasi hakkinda bir yargilama yapilamamistir. Bunun uzerine Anayasa Mahkemesine basvuru yapan gostericiler, Kolluk guclerinin orantisiz guc kullandigini ve bunlar hakkinda etkin bir sorusturma yapilmadigini iddia ederek Anayasal bir hak olan kisinin maddi ve manevi butunlugunun korunmasi, dusunce ve kanaat hurriyeti ile toplanti ve gosteri yuruyusu duzenleme haklarinin ihlal edildigini ileri surmuslerdir. Anayasa Mahkemesi, basvurucularin gosteriler esnasinda islemis olduklari fiiller uzerinden bir degerlendirme yapmak suretiyle karar vermistir. Nitekim Yuksek Mahkeme, bazi gostericiler hakkinda kolluk guclerine karsi mukavemet gosterdiklerinden bahisle bir hak ihlali olusmadigi kanaatine varirken bazilari hakkinda ise kolluk guclerinin mudahalesini gerektiren bir eylemlerinin bulunmadigi gerekcesiyle hak ihlali olduguna karar vermistir.","PeriodicalId":40112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83292751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper covers the system of appeal as an ordinary legal remedy in criminal cases under Hungarian criminal procedural law. First, the system of courts as an institutional background will be outlined, then the procedural and substantial conditions of appeal will be described. The framework of any remedial (appellate) system is determined by the following factors: the personal scope of the right to appeal, the grounds of appeal, the rights of the participants in the appellate proceedings, the form of court proceedings, the scope of revision, and the type of decisions the appellate court can deliver. This paper briefly describes all these factors so that the typical features of appeal under Hungarian criminal law can be seen. The paper covers both the institution of first and second appeal, highlighting the cases where a second appeal needs to be made available. Furthermore, the functioning of the constitutional complaint in criminal cases will also be drafted. This kind of constitutional remedy was first put into practice in the Hungarian procedural and constitutional system in 2012. Of the various problem points, the paper focuses on the participatory rights of the defendant in appellate procedures, highlighting the main debate and features of this topic under Hungarian criminal procedural law.
{"title":"The Right to Appeal and Individual Application in Criminal Proceedings in Hungary, with Special Regard to the Defendant’s Participatory Rights","authors":"Zsolt Szomora","doi":"10.26650/JPLC431913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/JPLC431913","url":null,"abstract":"This paper covers the system of appeal as an ordinary legal remedy in criminal cases under Hungarian criminal procedural law. First, the system of courts as an institutional background will be outlined, then the procedural and substantial conditions of appeal will be described. The framework of any remedial (appellate) system is determined by the following factors: the personal scope of the right to appeal, the grounds of appeal, the rights of the participants in the appellate proceedings, the form of court proceedings, the scope of revision, and the type of decisions the appellate court can deliver. This paper briefly describes all these factors so that the typical features of appeal under Hungarian criminal law can be seen. The paper covers both the institution of first and second appeal, highlighting the cases where a second appeal needs to be made available. Furthermore, the functioning of the constitutional complaint in criminal cases will also be drafted. This kind of constitutional remedy was first put into practice in the Hungarian procedural and constitutional system in 2012. Of the various problem points, the paper focuses on the participatory rights of the defendant in appellate procedures, highlighting the main debate and features of this topic under Hungarian criminal procedural law.","PeriodicalId":40112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88151515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Bu makalede, Ingiliz hukukunda kasten oldurme sucunda rizanin ceza sorumlulugunu kaldiran veya azaltan bir neden olarak kabul edilip edilmemesi sorunu ele alinacaktir. Bunu cevaplamak icin oncelikle gunumuzde Ingiliz hukukunda kasten oldurmede magdurun rizasini neyin etkisiz biraktigi belirlenecektir. Daha sonra asagidaki konulara deginilecektir; ilk olarak, riza nedir ve rizanin yasal ve ahlaki etkileri nelerdir, ikinci olarak, uygulanan hukukun rizayi kasten oldurmede ceza sorumlulugunu kaldiran bir neden olarak saymamasinin arkasindaki sebepler nelerdir ve son olarak da rizanin kasten oldurmede ceza sorumlulugunu kaldiran bir neden olarak hizmet edip etmemesi geregi tartisilacaktir. Her ne kadar rizanin eylemin haksizligini azalttigi soylenebilirse de insan onuru denilen nesnel ahlaki sebepten oturu, rizanin tek basina kasten oldurmede hicbir sekilde ceza sorumlulugunu kaldiran bir neden sayilmamasi gerektigi tartisilacaktir.
{"title":"Issue of Consent as a Defence of Deliberate Killing in English Law","authors":"Z. Ö. ERSOY YILMAZ","doi":"10.26650/jplc399529","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/jplc399529","url":null,"abstract":"Bu makalede, Ingiliz hukukunda kasten oldurme sucunda rizanin ceza sorumlulugunu kaldiran veya azaltan bir neden olarak kabul edilip edilmemesi sorunu ele alinacaktir. Bunu cevaplamak icin oncelikle gunumuzde Ingiliz hukukunda kasten oldurmede magdurun rizasini neyin etkisiz biraktigi belirlenecektir. Daha sonra asagidaki konulara deginilecektir; ilk olarak, riza nedir ve rizanin yasal ve ahlaki etkileri nelerdir, ikinci olarak, uygulanan hukukun rizayi kasten oldurmede ceza sorumlulugunu kaldiran bir neden olarak saymamasinin arkasindaki sebepler nelerdir ve son olarak da rizanin kasten oldurmede ceza sorumlulugunu kaldiran bir neden olarak hizmet edip etmemesi geregi tartisilacaktir. Her ne kadar rizanin eylemin haksizligini azalttigi soylenebilirse de insan onuru denilen nesnel ahlaki sebepten oturu, rizanin tek basina kasten oldurmede hicbir sekilde ceza sorumlulugunu kaldiran bir neden sayilmamasi gerektigi tartisilacaktir.","PeriodicalId":40112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77924597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Macedonian criminal law legislation was subjected to some serious reform resulting in a nearly novel Law on Criminal Procedure (Official Gazette 150/10) adopted on 18.11.2010 with a suspended enforcement as of December 2013. This new law transformed domestic criminal procedure from a so-called mixed neo-inquisitorial procedure into a fully adversarial, thus almost fully abandoning the investigation principle and the court paternalism accompanying it. Court investigation was cancelled with trials now being held in an adversarial proceeding through cross examination of the defendant, witnesses and expert witnesses by the parties. Constrained by time, the legal reform failed to introduce practically any important novelties in the area of remedies, so this field went without any significant change compared to the former LCP of 1997. Hence, it must be acknowledged that not only in Macedonia, but throughout the entire Western Balkan region, the reform of criminal procedure legislation pays very little attention to remedies, their redefinition within the context of the parties, the emphasized adversarial concept, including the equality of arms of the parties, the scope of the remedies, the grounds underlying the remedy, the hearings before the second-instance court, etc. Practically speaking, this led to the preservation of the remedy system from the LCP of former Yugoslavia. The Macedonian system of criminal proceeding contains the following remedies: -Ordinary: appeal to a first-instance judgment, appeal to a second-instance judgment, complaint to a decision. -Extraordinary: Motion for the protection of legality; motion for extraordinary review of an effective judgment, and motion for a re-trial. The reform has made a small rationalization of the remedy system in the sense that the extraordinary remedy entitled ‘Extraordinary mitigation of the sentence’ has been taken out.
{"title":"Legal Remedies in Criminal Procedural Law in the Republic of Macedonia","authors":"Gordan Kalajdziev, Gordana Lažetić","doi":"10.26650/jplc432331","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/jplc432331","url":null,"abstract":"Macedonian criminal law legislation was subjected to some serious reform resulting in a nearly novel Law on Criminal Procedure (Official Gazette 150/10) adopted on 18.11.2010 with a suspended enforcement as of December 2013. This new law transformed domestic criminal procedure from a so-called mixed neo-inquisitorial procedure into a fully adversarial, thus almost fully abandoning the investigation principle and the court paternalism accompanying it. Court investigation was cancelled with trials now being held in an adversarial proceeding through cross examination of the defendant, witnesses and expert witnesses by the parties. Constrained by time, the legal reform failed to introduce practically any important novelties in the area of remedies, so this field went without any significant change compared to the former LCP of 1997. Hence, it must be acknowledged that not only in Macedonia, but throughout the entire Western Balkan region, the reform of criminal procedure legislation pays very little attention to remedies, their redefinition within the context of the parties, the emphasized adversarial concept, including the equality of arms of the parties, the scope of the remedies, the grounds underlying the remedy, the hearings before the second-instance court, etc. Practically speaking, this led to the preservation of the remedy system from the LCP of former Yugoslavia. The Macedonian system of criminal proceeding contains the following remedies: -Ordinary: appeal to a first-instance judgment, appeal to a second-instance judgment, complaint to a decision. -Extraordinary: Motion for the protection of legality; motion for extraordinary review of an effective judgment, and motion for a re-trial. The reform has made a small rationalization of the remedy system in the sense that the extraordinary remedy entitled ‘Extraordinary mitigation of the sentence’ has been taken out.","PeriodicalId":40112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74023479","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Detention on Remand","authors":"Abdullah Batuhan Baytaz","doi":"10.26650/jplc2018-0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.26650/jplc2018-0012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":40112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79160952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：