Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice最新文献

Background: Several healthcare providers have failed to follow proper opioid prescribing practices to treat chronic pain in recent years. Therefore, the nation is experiencing an epidemic of opioid addiction, which has destroyed many lives. This quality improvement project aims to assess healthcare providers prescribing practices using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's guidelines to treat chronic pain.

Method: The methodology used was the Plan-Do-Study-Act framework. A total of 120 charts were reviewed before the pre and post-implementation of the CDC's guidelines to assess the prescribing practices of health care providers. Also, the QI project follows SQUIRE's 2.0 guidelines to describe the prescribing practices of providers. SQUIRE is a framework that helps researchers report new knowledge on improving patient care in the health care system. The literature review section in this article illuminates current evidence of using opioid guidelines and had provided guidance on how to improve opioids prescribing practices among providers. The guidelines can be retrieved at http://squire-statement.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.ViewPage&PageID=471 OUTCOMES: Using the CDC's guidelines helps to assess the prescribing practices of health care providers, the prescription rates of opioids dropped from 33.3% pre-implementation to 16.7% post-implementation.

Conclusion: Opioid prescriptions are a significant contributor to the rising opioid epidemic; therefore, educating clinicians about safe prescribing practices is crucial.

Background: Depression is a serious problem in the United States. It not only impacts chronic illness and healthcare utilization, but it can also result in death, intentional or unintentional. Despite the seriousness associated with depression, it continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated. The primary care setting provides an ideal location to screen and initiate treatment for depression in individuals who would otherwise not be screened.

Objective: The objective of this evidence-based practice project was to improve the diagnosis and treatment of depression in an adult primary care office.

Method: An intervention consisting of a HealthWatcher reminder for depression screening, the administration of the PHQ-9 instrument, and a treatment algorithm was incorporated into the office workflow. The charts of a pre-intervention random sample were compared to a post-intervention random sample to test for significant differences in depression screening and treatment rates.

Results: Using the chi-squared test, the post-intervention sample screening rate was significantly higher than pre-intervention sample rate (90% vs 23.3%; χ² = 54.3, df = 1, P < .000).

Conclusion/implications: It is feasible to improve the diagnosis and treatment of depression for adult primary care patients by modifying office protocols and using the PHQ-9 screening instrument and a treatment algorithm.

Background: Pediatric pain-related complaints continue to be a common presenting factor of most emergency departments (EDs). Studies have shown that several barriers in assessing and treating pediatric pain exist, including nursing knowledge regarding appropriate pain level assessment.

Objective: This quality improvement study aimed to provide and evaluate specific education regarding pediatric pain management for free-standing ED triage nurses to expedite medication administration during the triage phase of an ED visit.

Method: This pre/post-test intervention study was used to measure whether the education provided to nurses working in a primarily adult patient free-standing ED increased the utilization of triage standing orders related to pediatric pain management.

Results: Paired sample t-tests results indicated a statistically significant increase (p = .000) in the percentage of patients that received pain medication during the triage phase of an ED visit after specific education was provided to triage nurses.

Conclusion: Free-standing ED triage nurses are more likely to follow and implement triage standing orders if education explicitly related to pain management in pediatric patients has been provided.

Implications for practice: Pediatric pain management education should be revisited annually to re-educate nurses on the importance of early interventions.

Self-injurious behavior (SIB) is a major treatment focus for clinicians treating children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A review of the literature identified medical conditions that may be risk factors for an individual engaging in SIB. This study involved the creation and preliminary validation of a standardized assessment checklist: Risk Assessment Checklist for Self-Injury in Autism-Medical (RASCA-M) for the physical, behavioral, and diagnostic evaluation of non-verbal children with autism and SIB living in a residential setting. Preliminary content validity, criterion-related validity, and interobserver agreement were established. The RACSA-M is a promising instrument to assess underlying medical issues in non-verbal children with ASD and SIB.

Background: In teen pregnancy prevention (TPP) evidence-based program replication, fidelity toolkits (FTKs) provide structure to ensure that essential curricular components are delivered as intended.

Objective: The purpose of this project was to extend quality improvement efforts (Flinders, 2017) through analysis of FTKs from four years of TPP implementation.

Methods: An evidence-based TPP program was delivered to females, 15-19 years of age (n = 1,658) from four suburban Ohio counties. Fidelity rates were calculated by agency staff and undergraduate nursing students. Grounded theory was used to identify themes from the narrative sections of the FTKs. Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008) guided this quality improvement work.

Results: Staff fidelity was reported as 98.38%. Student fidelity was reported at 99.05%. Key themes, identified as a result of the qualitative analysis, were categorized as participant factors, site factors, or presenter factors.

Conclusions: Toolkits created an effective safeguard to ensure the replication of the evidence-based TPP program, with fidelity.

Implications for nursing: Undergraduate students are capable of implementing evidence-based programming, with fidelity, to meet the educational needs of their communities. Analysis of narrative comments from toolkits can influence FTK revisions to improve program delivery.

Background: Concern has been raised related to the rigor of DNP team projects due to the potential lack of individual opportunity for growth. However, team science, the scientific collaboration conducted by more than one individual in an interdependent fashion, is becoming standard practice for scientific inquiry and dissemination. DNP team projects provide an opportunity to demonstrate competencies related to collaboration, communication, organization, planning, reliability, accountability and acknowledgement of other opinions, expertise, and contributions. Faculty working with student teams may encounter challenges related to team dynamics and individual student evaluation. Thoughtful application of team science principles can assist in minimizing these challenges.

Method: The purpose of this paper is to describe two school's combined experiences and lessons learned in application of team science to DNP team projects.

Conclusion: When undertaken with an informed and organized approach, DNP team projects are an ideal strategy to enhance collaborative skills and position nurse leaders to positively impact health outcomes.

Background: Depression is a serious problem in the United States. It not only impacts chronic illness and healthcare utilization, but it can also result in death, intentional or unintentional.Despite the seriousness associated with depression, it continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated. The primary care setting provides an ideal location to screen and initiate treatment for depression in individuals who would otherwise not be screened.

Objective: The objective of this evidence-based practice project was to improve the diagnosis and treatment of depression in an adult primary care office.

Method: An intervention consisting of a HealthWatcher reminder for depression screening, the administration of the PHQ-9 instrument, and a treatment algorithm was incorporated into the office workflow. The charts of a pre-intervention random sample were compared to a post-intervention random sample to test for significant differences in depression screening and treatment rates.

Results: Using the chi-squared test, the post-intervention sample screening rate was significantly higher than pre-intervention sample rate (90% vs 23.3%; χ² = 54.3, df = 1, P < .000).

Conclusion/implications: It is feasible to improve the diagnosis and treatment of depression for adult primary care patients by modifying office protocols and using the PHQ-9 screening instrument and a treatment algorithm.