Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice最新文献

Background: Chlamydia is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the United States, with an incidence of 1.7 million infections annually. It results in an estimated $691 million in lifetime medical costs. Objective: The objective of the project was to improve effective care for women at risk of chlamydia infection in a rural family planning clinic to 80% in 90 days. Methods: The Plan-Do-Study-Act process of quality improvement (QI) was implemented over four 2-week cycles. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed iteratively and informed tests of change for each cycle. Results: Results indicated an improvement in effective care from a baseline of 42%-81%. Patient visit time decreased from 38 minutes at baseline to 23 minutes. Compared with pre-implementation, the number of positive chlamydia test results went from three to six, doubling the positivity rate, while the number of chlamydia tests billed increased by 32%. Conclusions: This project was successful in improving effective care. Implementing a standardized risk assessment decreased patient visit time. Implications for nursing: QI projects directed at meeting national standards for STI screening can be implemented in rural health clinics at low cost and with high impact.

Background: Varying protocols among sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs lead to inconsistent patient care and indicate that evidence-based recommendations are not being utilized. To address this problem, an evidence-based treatment protocol designed to improve care provided to patients who have experienced sexual assault was implemented at an outpatient rape crisis center (RCC). In addition to implementing the new protocol, a SANE education program was provided. Methods: Retrospective chart reviews were conducted. A total of 21 protocol components were examined pre- and post-implementation of the quality improvement project. Additionally, a knowledge quiz and self-efficacy tool were administered before, immediately after, and 3 months after the SANE education program. Results: Before implementation, the overall compliance with the 21 protocol components was 42.1% for RCC exams and 17.9% for hospital exams. After implementation, the overall compliance increased to 85.3% for RCC exams and 56% for hospital exams. When examining protocol components individually, compliance varied dramatically. There was an improvement in SANE knowledge and self-efficacy when comparing pre- and post-scores; however, the results were not statistically significant and were found to have unequal variances. Conclusion: Nurses are ideally positioned to instigate protocol changes that will positively impact patient outcomes. Other nursing professionals can utilize the quality improvement project content, steps, lessons learned, and results to create similar evidence-based practice quality improvement projects to address gaps in practice.

The Behavioral Health Home model of care enables patients living with severe persistent mental illness to access both mental health and primary care services, leading to improved mental and physical well-being. This article presents the implementation and health outcomes of colocating a primary care provider within an outpatient psychiatric rehabilitation day program.

Even if everything is done right in justifying the clinical benefit of a healthcare initiative, it cannot be sustainable if, first and foremost, the temperament of the practice environment, including the wider institutional hierarchy, is not accurately gauged. The purpose of this article is to provide the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) researcher with a systematic structure enabling a review of the larger context of the proposed clinical innovation. This review supports a DNP-led healthcare initiative through self-analysis of the researcher's role; forging a relationship with a mentor; the analysis and mitigation of institutional, collaborative, and organizational barriers; and negotiating strategic partnerships with colleagues and departments and sharing their work and expertise. The blueprint that can change the interface of these elements is the creation of a specific research advisory committee (RADCOMM). The RADCOMM can be the impetus for transforming the institution into a place for learning, personal and professional growth and development, and patient safety, as well as one that results in new common resources and improved practice scholarship. The next generation of scholars and their capacity to understand their position in healthcare is inherently inhibited by not integrating the role and value of practice scholarship. The success of a DNP-led healthcare initiative, however, can positively affect the researcher's mental health, productivity, and career satisfaction.

Background: There are numerous benefits to academic practice partnerships. While there is great emphasis on the new graduate nurse transition to practice, there is less intention placed on the new nurse practitioner (NP) role transition. In a rural teaching hospital, leadership perceived a need for more support to successfully transition NPs into hospitalist practice roles. Objective: One academic practice partnership developed and implemented a grant-funded program to support advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) transition to practice at a rural teaching hospital. Methods: Informed by the results of a needs assessment, faculty and practice partners delivered lecture content in a face-to-face setting during scheduled hours. Results: Although the content was well received, attendance to and engagement with the program were suboptimal. Conclusions: Upon reflection, the program team gained valuable lessons regarding role expectations, intentional interdisciplinary collaboration, timing, alignment, delivery format, and the need for a dedicated program coordinator. Implications for nursing: APRN transition programs can provide much-needed support with dedicated structure, clear communication, and individualized content. It can also be a recruitment and retention strategy for healthcare organizations.

Background: Depression and anxiety occur in 7.8% and 19.1% of the US population, respectively. About half of those patients are diagnosed in primary care. Objective: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to improve the screening and diagnosing of anxiety and/or depression among adult patients at a primary care clinic by implementing an evidence-based mental health screening interview technique. Methods: The team implemented a mental health screening interview technique that incorporates background, affect, trouble, handling, and empathy and motivational interviewing techniques in addition to self-report surveys. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were conducted to assess providers' perceptions of the new interview technique. ICD-10 code data were gathered to assess the effectiveness of the new mental health screening interview technique. Results: The number of documented diagnoses of single-episode major depressive disorder decreased by 18%, recurrent major depressive disorder increased by 34%, and anxiety disorders increased by 3%. There were more favorable provider perceptions of the new screening interview technique versus the traditional screening method. Conclusions: The results show an improvement in provider comfort and providers preferred the new mental health screening when using an evidence-based mental health screening interview technique. Implications for nursing: The results show the potential benefits of using a structured mental health interview with self-report screening tools when diagnosing anxiety and depression in primary care.

Background: Mentorship is a vital part of the nursing profession. The evidence suggests that competent mentors aid in facilitating role transitions, improving job satisfaction, enhancing patient care, and decreasing nursing turnover. Advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) have the skills and knowledge to provide safe, high-quality, patient-centered care; however, they may be lacking in mentorship abilities. Objective: Currently, there is no formal mentorship training in the organization, which may cause variability in the mentoring of new staff. The focus of this project was to create a staff educational intervention to improve the mentoring competency of surgical APRNs. The knowledge gap, lack of mentoring education given to APRNs acting as mentors to novice practitioners, was noted, and this project identified a staff educational intervention on mentorship training that was developed and implemented. Methods: The project practice-focused question asked if a formal APRN mentorship training program geared toward the six elements of mentoring (as measured by the Mentoring Competency Assessment [MCA]) increased the mentoring competency of APRNs serving in a mentorship role. Benner's theory guided the planning and development of this project, while the MCA was used for the self-reflection survey. Following a pretest survey, participants experienced an educational intervention geared toward mentoring and mentoring competencies. Formal APRN mentorship training program with an educational intervention that addressed the six domains of mentoring competency geared toward increasing the mentoring competency of APRNs who serve in a mentorship role. Results: A total of 18 surgical APRNs (N = 18) with more than 2 years of experience participated in the staff educational intervention. There was a statistically significant difference in six of the 26 individual items and in the overall pretest mean scores and the posttest mean scores (z = -3.41, p < .01), indicating that the APRN mentorship training increased the mentoring competency of the APRNs. Conclusion: The results of this quality improvement project demonstrated how an educational intervention geared toward mentoring competencies can increase the knowledge among a group of APRNs. Educating APRNs in mentorship competencies may enhance mentorship abilities and result in positive patient and organizational outcomes. Implications for Nursing: Educating APRNs in mentorship competencies may enhance mentorship abilities and result in positive patient and organizational outcomes.

Background: Diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death in the United States and the leading cause of lower limb amputations, adult-onset blindness, and renal failure. It is estimated that 34.2 million Americans have a diabetes diagnosis, and the prevalence of this condition has continually increased over the last two decades. This study includes patients at a large, suburban primary care practice in southwest Ohio who were considered to have uncontrolled diabetes based on their last Hemoglobin A1c of greater than 9%. Compliance with recommended annual screenings among this population was 15%. Objectives: The aim of this project was to improve glycemic control and increase the number of patients who received the recommended annual screenings through the implementation of nurse practitioner-driven, diabetes-focused "Right Care" visits.C Methods: This quality improvement pilot study consisted of interventions implemented over the four plan-do-study-act cycles. Each cycle included a test of change that was identified based on data from previous cycles to ensure continuous improvement throughout project implementation. Four interventions were evaluated including the utilization of a diabetes registry, implementation of a "Right Care" checklist during "Right Care" visits, use of a patient engagement tool with a focus on individualizing diabetes medication regimens, and implementation of a team-engagement plan. Results: Average Hemoglobin A1c reduction was 2.4% post-"Right Care" visit. Compliance with the annual screening bundle increased to 44% over 8 weeks. Utilization of the patient/provider relationship increased visit compliance by 18%, and the team engagement plan decreased work-related stress by 12%. Conclusions: The implementation of "Right Care" visits led to improved glycemic control and increased compliance with the recommended annual screenings among patients with an A1c greater than 9%. The patient engagement tool identified key factors related to diabetes medication adherence and team engagement decreased work-related stress and improved annual fundoscopic exam screening compliance. Implications for Nursing: Nurse practitioner-led "Right Care" visits utilize the knowledge and skills of advanced practice registered nurses to improve glycemic control in patients with uncontrolled diabetes.

Background: Measurement-based care (MBC) is a method for demonstrating performance outcomes but is rarely used in behavioral health settings despite it being an evidence-based practice. As psychiatry moves to value-based care and payment for performance, the adoption of MBC will be essential. Objective: The purpose of the study was to test proactive reporting of patient self-reported measurement tool results to providers on treatment outcomes to promote the adoption of MBC. Methods: The study entailed a mixed methods design with a pre-/post-test quantitative measurement of scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and a semistructured qualitative interview with providers following data collection. Results: Results showed, during the intervention period, statistically significant decreases in anxiety scores for all patients. Depression symptom decreases trended toward significance for female patients. After initial disregard for scores, all providers found a benefit to continued use of MBC. Conclusions: Identification and removal of barriers can assist in the adoption of evidence-based practices in healthcare. Implications for Nursing: Successful change can be accomplished with minor adjustments to an already-established workflow and a team approach to the process.