Westbrook, Donald A. 2019. Among the Scientologists: History, Theology, and Praxis. New York: Oxford University Press.
唐纳德·威斯布鲁克,2019。山达基人:历史、神学与实践。纽约:牛津大学出版社。
{"title":"Westbrook, Donald A. 2019. Among the Scientologists: History, Theology, and Praxis.","authors":"A. L. Bowden","doi":"10.1558/FIRN.18361","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1558/FIRN.18361","url":null,"abstract":"Westbrook, Donald A. 2019. Among the Scientologists: History, Theology, and Praxis. New York: Oxford University Press.","PeriodicalId":41468,"journal":{"name":"Fieldwork in Religion","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41444060","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kapaló, James A. 2019. Inochentism and Orthodox Christianity: Religious Dissent in the Russian Borderlands. London: Routledge.
Kapaló, James A. 2019。乡土主义与东正教:俄罗斯边疆地区的宗教异议。伦敦:劳特利奇。
{"title":"Kapaló, James A. 2019. Inochentism and Orthodox Christianity: Religious Dissent in the Russian Borderlands.","authors":"R. Clark","doi":"10.1558/FIRN.18362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1558/FIRN.18362","url":null,"abstract":"Kapaló, James A. 2019. Inochentism and Orthodox Christianity: Religious Dissent in the Russian Borderlands. London: Routledge.","PeriodicalId":41468,"journal":{"name":"Fieldwork in Religion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42947167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Berking, Helmuth, Silke Steets and Jochen Schwenk (eds) 2018. Religious Pluralism and the City. London: Bloomsbury.
Berking, Helmuth, Silke streets and Jochen Schwenk(编)2018。宗教多元化与城市。伦敦:布卢姆斯伯里。
{"title":"Berking, Helmuth, Silke Steets and Jochen Schwenk (eds) 2018. Religious Pluralism and the City.","authors":"Taylor E. Hartson","doi":"10.1558/FIRN.18363","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1558/FIRN.18363","url":null,"abstract":"Berking, Helmuth, Silke Steets and Jochen Schwenk (eds) 2018. Religious Pluralism and the City. London: Bloomsbury.","PeriodicalId":41468,"journal":{"name":"Fieldwork in Religion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44526659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Multiple and context-specific terms for “home” in Indian languages can help us as ethnographers imagine and recognize home(s) and field(s) as non-binary, multiple, fluid, intersecting categories. In North India, these terms may include: mul nivas, gaon, ghar, maika (pihar), sasural. The terms identify home by ancestry, residence, performance and ritual, affect, landscapes, and familial and other relationships. Paying attention to the everyday use of indigenous terms, we also learn that home may be gendered and may change over a person’s life cycle. While concepts of belonging and home are fluid and multiple, they may also have limits and constraints. Individuals in our research communities, families, academic audiences—and we as ethnographers—all have the potential to belong or lose belonging, even to renounce belonging, in multiple ways that shift over time and in different contexts. One of our tasks as ethnographers is to recognize these possibilities and to write in ways that leave space for their fluidity.
{"title":"Afterword: Multiplicities and Intersections of Homes and Fields","authors":"J. Flueckiger","doi":"10.1558/FIRN.18359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1558/FIRN.18359","url":null,"abstract":"Multiple and context-specific terms for “home” in Indian languages can help us as ethnographers imagine and recognize home(s) and field(s) as non-binary, multiple, fluid, intersecting categories. In North India, these terms may include: mul nivas, gaon, ghar, maika (pihar), sasural. The terms identify home by ancestry, residence, performance and ritual, affect, landscapes, and familial and other relationships. Paying attention to the everyday use of indigenous terms, we also learn that home may be gendered and may change over a person’s life cycle. While concepts of belonging and home are fluid and multiple, they may also have limits and constraints. Individuals in our research communities, families, academic audiences—and we as ethnographers—all have the potential to belong or lose belonging, even to renounce belonging, in multiple ways that shift over time and in different contexts. One of our tasks as ethnographers is to recognize these possibilities and to write in ways that leave space for their fluidity.","PeriodicalId":41468,"journal":{"name":"Fieldwork in Religion","volume":"15 1","pages":"180–192-180–192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42594128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article focuses on the intergenerational gifts and relationships that have structured my experience of the flows between home and the field in order to highlight the deeply intersubjective and relational aspects of fieldwork. It considers the shifting technologies of reflection—the diverse forms of field-writing that I produced at different stages as intertextual mediations of my fieldworlds—present in an archive chronicling twenty-five years of study and fieldwork in South India. Excavating this archive—which includes traditional fieldnotes, handwritten letters, creative essays, emails, voice memos and visual fieldnotes—has sharpened my awareness of the value of analyzing fieldwork experiences longitudinally and offers rich glimpses of everyday religion and gendered social relations. These materials underscore the interpenetrations of home and field, life and death, and self and other and prompt me to reaffirm my commitment to centering the crucial relationships that develop in these contexts in my scholarship, teaching and mentoring.
{"title":"Shifting Technologies of Reflection","authors":"A. Allocco","doi":"10.1558/FIRN.18358","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1558/FIRN.18358","url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the intergenerational gifts and relationships that have structured my experience of the flows between home and the field in order to highlight the deeply intersubjective and relational aspects of fieldwork. It considers the shifting technologies of reflection—the diverse forms of field-writing that I produced at different stages as intertextual mediations of my fieldworlds—present in an archive chronicling twenty-five years of study and fieldwork in South India. Excavating this archive—which includes traditional fieldnotes, handwritten letters, creative essays, emails, voice memos and visual fieldnotes—has sharpened my awareness of the value of analyzing fieldwork experiences longitudinally and offers rich glimpses of everyday religion and gendered social relations. These materials underscore the interpenetrations of home and field, life and death, and self and other and prompt me to reaffirm my commitment to centering the crucial relationships that develop in these contexts in my scholarship, teaching and mentoring.","PeriodicalId":41468,"journal":{"name":"Fieldwork in Religion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45113203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Driscoll, Christopher M. and Monica R. Miller. 2018. Method as Identity: Manufacturing Distance in the Academic Study of Religion. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Christopher M. Driscoll和Monica R. Miller, 2018。作为身份的方法:制造宗教学术研究中的距离。兰哈姆,医学博士:列克星敦图书公司。
{"title":"Driscoll, Christopher M. and Monica R. Miller. 2018. Method as Identity: Manufacturing Distance in the Academic Study of Religion.","authors":"F. Silva","doi":"10.1558/FIRN.18368","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1558/FIRN.18368","url":null,"abstract":"Driscoll, Christopher M. and Monica R. Miller. 2018. Method as Identity: Manufacturing Distance in the Academic Study of Religion. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.","PeriodicalId":41468,"journal":{"name":"Fieldwork in Religion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47466281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
During doctoral research in India, between June 1979 and March 1981, I wrote, often twice a week, to my mother, Ruth M. Grodzins, in Chicago. She saved these letters more or less in chronological order by attaching each one to a sheet of notebook paper in a bulging three-ring binder. Approximately forty years later I peruse them gingerly, with mixed feelings. Some of the letters’ content is nearly identical with the ethnographic writing that emerged from my first fieldwork and holds no surprises. Some of them recall fraught interpersonal hassles in all their immediate anguish. These later resolved themselves so thoroughly I totally forgot all about the incidents that, at the time, as evidenced in my letters and daily diary, had consumed me. However, to a retired anthropologist looking back on her first fieldwork, the best parts of these letters are their evocations of intensely experienced discoveries as well as of everyday pleasures, preoccupations and relationships.
1979年6月至1981年3月,在印度做博士研究期间,我给住在芝加哥的母亲露丝·m·格罗津斯(Ruth M. Grodzins)写信,通常每周两次。她把这些信按时间顺序或多或少地保存下来,把每一封都夹在一张笔记本纸上,装在一个鼓鼓的三环活页夹里。大约四十年后,我怀着复杂的心情小心翼翼地阅读它们。一些信件的内容几乎与我第一次实地考察中出现的民族志写作相同,没有任何惊喜。他们中的一些人回忆起在他们所有的即时痛苦中令人担忧的人际纠纷。这些事情后来都彻底解决了,我完全忘记了当时在我的信件和日记中所记载的那些折磨我的事情。然而,对于一位退休的人类学家来说,回顾她的第一次田野调查,这些信件中最好的部分是它们唤起了强烈的经验发现,以及日常的快乐,关注和关系。
{"title":"Paper Trails","authors":"A. Gold","doi":"10.1558/FIRN.18349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1558/FIRN.18349","url":null,"abstract":"During doctoral research in India, between June 1979 and March 1981, I wrote, often twice a week, to my mother, Ruth M. Grodzins, in Chicago. She saved these letters more or less in chronological order by attaching each one to a sheet of notebook paper in a bulging three-ring binder. Approximately forty years later I peruse them gingerly, with mixed feelings. Some of the letters’ content is nearly identical with the ethnographic writing that emerged from my first fieldwork and holds no surprises. Some of them recall fraught interpersonal hassles in all their immediate anguish. These later resolved themselves so thoroughly I totally forgot all about the incidents that, at the time, as evidenced in my letters and daily diary, had consumed me. However, to a retired anthropologist looking back on her first fieldwork, the best parts of these letters are their evocations of intensely experienced discoveries as well as of everyday pleasures, preoccupations and relationships.","PeriodicalId":41468,"journal":{"name":"Fieldwork in Religion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41771093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ashcraft, W. Michael. 2018. A Historical Introduction to the Study of New Religious Movements. London: Routledge.
王晓明,2018。新宗教运动研究的历史导论。伦敦:劳特利奇。
{"title":"Ashcraft, W. Michael. 2018. A Historical Introduction to the Study of New Religious Movements.","authors":"B. Zeller","doi":"10.1558/FIRN.18360","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1558/FIRN.18360","url":null,"abstract":"Ashcraft, W. Michael. 2018. A Historical Introduction to the Study of New Religious Movements. London: Routledge.","PeriodicalId":41468,"journal":{"name":"Fieldwork in Religion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47213311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}