Pub Date : 2022-11-14DOI: 10.24818/tbj/2022/12/3.01
Vytis Valatka, Vaida Asakavičiūtė
This article analyzes the philosophy of international law of the Second, or Modern Scholasticism. The author of the article concentrates on the just war theory mainly developed by Francisco de Vitoria and Francisco Suarez. The objectives of the article are to clarify and classify the main principles of the above-mentioned theory as well as to grasp its relevance nowadays. In order to achieve these objectives doxographical, analytical as well as hermeneutical methods are applied. Based on them, the principles and rules of just war are divided into two fundamental types. The article comes to conclusion that these types correspond to the parts of contemporary just war theory entitled as jus ad bellum and jus in bello. Another significant conclusion is that the vast majority of the principles of just war presented in Modern Scholasticism (e.g. just cause of the war, adversary’s warning of intended offensive actions, the inviolability of ambassadors and peaceful population, prohibition on killing prisoners of war and hostages, the compliance of reparations with the damage caused before and during the war, the illegality of religious and confessional wars) are also relevant nowadays.
{"title":"The philosophy of international law of Modern Scholasticism:\u0000the theory of just war","authors":"Vytis Valatka, Vaida Asakavičiūtė","doi":"10.24818/tbj/2022/12/3.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2022/12/3.01","url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the philosophy of international law of the Second, or Modern\u0000Scholasticism. The author of the article concentrates on the just war theory mainly developed\u0000by Francisco de Vitoria and Francisco Suarez. The objectives of the article are to clarify and\u0000classify the main principles of the above-mentioned theory as well as to grasp its relevance\u0000nowadays. In order to achieve these objectives doxographical, analytical as well as\u0000hermeneutical methods are applied. Based on them, the principles and rules of just war are\u0000divided into two fundamental types. The article comes to conclusion that these types\u0000correspond to the parts of contemporary just war theory entitled as jus ad bellum and jus in\u0000bello. Another significant conclusion is that the vast majority of the principles of just war\u0000presented in Modern Scholasticism (e.g. just cause of the war, adversary’s warning of\u0000intended offensive actions, the inviolability of ambassadors and peaceful population,\u0000prohibition on killing prisoners of war and hostages, the compliance of reparations with the\u0000damage caused before and during the war, the illegality of religious and confessional wars)\u0000are also relevant nowadays.","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42178613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}