Vânia Wongtschowski Kleiman, Maria Lucia Pereira Cetraro
{"title":"V Congresso Internacional CBMA de Arbitragem","authors":"Vânia Wongtschowski Kleiman, Maria Lucia Pereira Cetraro","doi":"10.54648/rba2022036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2022036","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":422222,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115334346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article deals with policy concerns regarding the availability of 28 U.S.C. § 1782 discovery in aid of private international arbitration. It focuses on two main policy concerns, and, to that effect, it aims to answer two questions. First, Does Section 1782 Undermine Arbitrators’ Control Over the Taking of Evidence? Second, Does Section 1782 Undermine International Arbitration’s Efficiency? This article answers negatively to both questions, therefore concluding that Section 1782 is pro-arbitration. International arbitration; evidence gathering; evidence; discovery; arbitrators’ authority; comparative law; U.S. law; section 1782.
{"title":"Two reasons why Section 1782 is pro-arbitration","authors":"Gustavo Favero Vaughn, Flávio Luiz Yarshell","doi":"10.54648/rba2022029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2022029","url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with policy concerns regarding the availability of 28 U.S.C. § 1782 discovery in aid of private international arbitration. It focuses on two main policy concerns, and, to that effect, it aims to answer two questions. First, Does Section 1782 Undermine Arbitrators’ Control Over the Taking of Evidence? Second, Does Section 1782 Undermine International Arbitration’s Efficiency? This article answers negatively to both questions, therefore concluding that Section 1782 is pro-arbitration.\u0000International arbitration; evidence gathering; evidence; discovery; arbitrators’ authority; comparative law; U.S. law; section 1782.","PeriodicalId":422222,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","volume":"387 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116372062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Homenagem a Carlos Eduardo Moreira Ferreira, um brasileiro ilustre","authors":"S. F. Lemes","doi":"10.54648/rba2022025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2022025","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":422222,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115286796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Lei nº 15.812, de 17 de março de 2022, do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul: a Instituição dos Comitês de Prevenção e Solução de Disputas em Contratos Administrativos Continuados Celebrados pelo Estado","authors":"Cristiane Gertel","doi":"10.54648/rba2022033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2022033","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":422222,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132874429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Arbitration involving state entities in Brazil has a long history. This paper analyses how this type of arbitration arose in Brazil, what were the strategies that Brazilian courts and legislative bodies employed to make it work and how do they compare to the rest of Latin America. This paper shows what were the key legal issues associated with resolving commercial conflicts with state parties in Brazil, how they were regulated and, most importantly, why arbitration became so relevant for state parties in Brazil, while other countries in Latin America avoid using the method. State entities; arbitration; Brazil; development; public.
{"title":"The development of arbitration involving State Parties in Brazil: comparative remarks with Latin America","authors":"C. Pereira, Leonardo F. Souza-McMurtrie","doi":"10.54648/rba2022027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2022027","url":null,"abstract":"Arbitration involving state entities in Brazil has a long history. This paper analyses how this type of arbitration arose in Brazil, what were the strategies that Brazilian courts and legislative bodies employed to make it work and how do they compare to the rest of Latin America. This paper shows what were the key legal issues associated with resolving commercial conflicts with state parties in Brazil, how they were regulated and, most importantly, why arbitration became so relevant for state parties in Brazil, while other countries in Latin America avoid using the method.\u0000State entities; arbitration; Brazil; development; public.","PeriodicalId":422222,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126219718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A impossibilidade do uso de provas obtidas por discovery em arbitragens estrangeiras ou internacionais. Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos, AlixPartners, LLP, ET AL., v. The Fund for Protection of Investor’s Right in Foreign States, No. 18-1048. Justice Barrett, J. 13.06.2022","authors":"João Gabriel Scarpellini Campos","doi":"10.54648/rba2022031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2022031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":422222,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","volume":"179 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124156825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Relato sobre o 10th ICC Brazilian Arbitration Day – 2022","authors":"Fabiana de Cerqueira Leite","doi":"10.54648/rba2022034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2022034","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":422222,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128800887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This empirical study updates and extends research published in 2014 on the use of arbitration clauses by publicly traded companies in Brazil to elucidate the current state and recent developments in the field of arbitration in Brazilian capital markets. In 2021, 234 publicly traded companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, amounting to 61% of companies listed on B3. Even in the Traditional and Level 1 segments, where arbitration is not mandatory, 27% of the companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, compared to only 15% in 2013. In addition, among the 41% listed companies with shareholder agreements, 77% opt for arbitration, compared to 70% in 2013. Although a significant proportion of companies have not yet adopted arbitration clauses, we observe a small increase in the adoption of arbitration by publicly traded companies between 2013 and 2021. In the last quarter of 2021, 18% of the companies comprising the Ibovespa index had no arbitration clause in their corporate charter. When arbitration not mandatory, the Câmara de Arbitragem do Mercado was selected by 76% of companies listed on Traditional and Level 1 segments, as well as by 61% of the total number of companies that have an arbitration clause in their shareholder agreements. Empirical study; capital market; publicly traded companies; arbitration clause; arbitration; corporate charter; shareholder agreement.
本实证研究更新并扩展了2014年发表的关于巴西上市公司使用仲裁条款的研究，以阐明巴西资本市场仲裁领域的现状和最新发展。2021年，共有234家上市公司在公司章程中加入仲裁条款，占B3类上市公司的61%。即使是在传统和一级市场，仲裁不是强制性的，27%的公司在其公司章程中有仲裁条款，而2013年只有15%。此外，在41%有股东协议的上市公司中，77%的公司选择仲裁，而2013年这一比例为70%。尽管很大一部分公司尚未采用仲裁条款，但我们观察到，2013年至2021年期间，上市公司采用仲裁的情况略有增加。在2021年最后一个季度，Ibovespa指数中18%的公司在其公司章程中没有仲裁条款。在非强制性仲裁的情况下，76%的传统和一级市场上市公司以及61%的股东协议中有仲裁条款的公司选择了市场仲裁委员会(cmara de Arbitragem do Mercado)。实证研究;资本市场;上市公司;仲裁条款;仲裁;公司章程;股东协议。
{"title":"Cláusulas arbitrais em números no mercado de capitais brasileiro","authors":"Mariana Pargendler, Viviane Muller Prado, Ezequiel Fajreldines Santos, Dalila Martins Viol","doi":"10.54648/rba2022028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2022028","url":null,"abstract":"This empirical study updates and extends research published in 2014 on the use of arbitration clauses by publicly traded companies in Brazil to elucidate the current state and recent developments in the field of arbitration in Brazilian capital markets. In 2021, 234 publicly traded companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, amounting to 61% of companies listed on B3. Even in the Traditional and Level 1 segments, where arbitration is not mandatory, 27% of the companies had arbitration clauses in their corporate charter, compared to only 15% in 2013. In addition, among the 41% listed companies with shareholder agreements, 77% opt for arbitration, compared to 70% in 2013. Although a significant proportion of companies have not yet adopted arbitration clauses, we observe a small increase in the adoption of arbitration by publicly traded companies between 2013 and 2021. In the last quarter of 2021, 18% of the companies comprising the Ibovespa index had no arbitration clause in their corporate charter. When arbitration not mandatory, the Câmara de Arbitragem do Mercado was selected by 76% of companies listed on Traditional and Level 1 segments, as well as by 61% of the total number of companies that have an arbitration clause in their shareholder agreements.\u0000Empirical study; capital market; publicly traded companies; arbitration clause; arbitration; corporate charter; shareholder agreement.","PeriodicalId":422222,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127412370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comentário sobre a decisão da Corte de Cassação francesa no caso Belokon v. República do Quirguistão, de 23 de março de 2022","authors":"G. S. Silveira","doi":"10.54648/rba2022032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/rba2022032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":422222,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125959747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：