Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy最新文献

Purpose: The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in an influx of critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation, some receiving venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The benefits of early mobility while undergoing ECMO have been previously documented. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has presented physical therapists with novel challenges, balancing the risk of a widespread shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) with the benefits of early mobility for patients on ECMO. The purpose of this case study is to report the successful rehabilitation of a critically ill patient with COVID-19 undergoing VV ECMO.

Methods: This is a case description of a 38-year-old man who presented to the hospital with COVID-19 and subsequent intubation and cannulation for VV ECMO. Physical therapy was initiated while the patient remained critically ill on VV ECMO. Focused coordination and education were employed to limit PPE usage by limiting the number of essential staff/therapists that entered the room as well as changing the frequency of therapy sessions dependent on how the patient was progressing functionally.

Results: On VV ECMO day 11, he was able to sit up and perform a sit-to-stand. ECMO decannulation occurred on hospital day 14 with extubation on hospital day 18. The patient progressed functionally while quarantined in the room until he was discharged home with supplemental oxygen after spending 29 days in the hospital.

Conclusion: This case study demonstrates the clinical decision-making used to provide physical therapy services for a critically ill patient with COVID-19. High-level team coordination resulted in limiting the use of PPE as well as reducing staff exposure frequency during rehabilitation. Despite his severe critical illness, the patient was successfully discharged home within 30 days.

Objective: To describe the characteristics of patients and investigate the utilization of physical (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) intervention for those with a positive coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis compared with other patient populations during the first 6 weeks of the novel coronavirus pandemic.

Methods: A retrospective, observational study of adult inpatients with a length of stay of 1 or more days at an urban hospital in Detroit, Michigan. Individuals with a COVID-19 diagnosis were compared with a cohort within similar diagnostic categories (respiratory, fever, and sepsis) but without COVID-19. Outcome measures included PT or OT intervention on 1 or more days, the timing of initial PT or OT visit, the average number of visits and units per patient, length of stay, discharge to home, and readmission within 30 days.

Results: Individuals with COVID-19 had lower rates of discharge to home (P = .001), higher rates of readmission within 30 days of hospital discharge (P = .01), increased hospital length of stay (P = .001), and waited an average of 3.1 days longer for therapy evaluations than subjects in the comparison group (P = .001). The percentage of subjects who had one or more PT or OT visits during their hospital stays was comparable between groups. Once therapy was initiated, the average number of visits per patient and dosing of units in 15-minute increments were similar between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: Patients acutely ill with COVID-19 hospitalized with the virus during the first 6 weeks of the pandemic remained in the intensive care unit and hospital longer than their counterparts without COVID-19 and had a delay in initiation of PT and OT intervention. PT and OT are important members of the care team for patients with the novel coronavirus. Understanding the descriptive characteristics of patients and therapy services during the initial surge could help improve utilization and patient outcomes.