Pub Date : 2020-10-01DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1805955
Amanda Reid
Justice Felix Frankfurter once observed, “The history of American freedom is, in no small measure, the history of procedure.” Professor Henry Monaghan’s 1970 article highlighted for me the deft adjustment of procedural rules by the Supreme Court of the United States to protect substantive speech interests. As other scholars confirm, “procedure is power.” Early on in my legal studies, I had a rudimentary understanding of procedure’s power to govern how our rights are enforced and protected. But it wasn’t until I read Professor Monaghan’s article that I came to more fully appreciate the Court’s calibration of procedural levers to safeguard substantive liberties.
Felix Frankfurter大法官曾说过，“美国自由的历史在很大程度上就是程序的历史。”Henry Monaghan教授1970年的文章向我强调了美国最高法院为保护实质性言论利益而对程序规则的巧妙调整。正如其他学者所证实的那样，“程序就是权力。”在我进行法律研究的早期，我对程序的权力有了初步的理解，即如何执行和保护我们的权利。但直到我读到莫纳汉教授的文章，我才更加充分地理解法院为保障实质自由而调整程序杠杆的做法。
{"title":"Monaghan, Henry P. First Amendment Due Process, 83 Harv. L. Rev. 518 (1970)","authors":"Amanda Reid","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805955","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805955","url":null,"abstract":"Justice Felix Frankfurter once observed, “The history of American freedom is, in no small measure, the history of procedure.” Professor Henry Monaghan’s 1970 article highlighted for me the deft adjustment of procedural rules by the Supreme Court of the United States to protect substantive speech interests. As other scholars confirm, “procedure is power.” Early on in my legal studies, I had a rudimentary understanding of procedure’s power to govern how our rights are enforced and protected. But it wasn’t until I read Professor Monaghan’s article that I came to more fully appreciate the Court’s calibration of procedural levers to safeguard substantive liberties.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805955","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45669727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1805976
David Anderson
We should have paid more attention to Fred. His skepticism about some of the dogmas of media law, if more widely appreciated, could have prevented some of the harm that excessive free speech zealot...
{"title":"Schauer, Frederick. Uncoupling Free Speech, 92 Colum. L. Rev. 1321 (1992)","authors":"David Anderson","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805976","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805976","url":null,"abstract":"We should have paid more attention to Fred. His skepticism about some of the dogmas of media law, if more widely appreciated, could have prevented some of the harm that excessive free speech zealot...","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805976","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48704103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1805946
W. Hopkins
Erroneous speech is inevitable in free and open debate, Justice Lewis Powell wrote in 1974. 1 The rationale for protecting such speech, he wrote, was that “[t]he First Amendment requires that we pr...
{"title":"Articles That Matter","authors":"W. Hopkins","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805946","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805946","url":null,"abstract":"Erroneous speech is inevitable in free and open debate, Justice Lewis Powell wrote in 1974. 1 The rationale for protecting such speech, he wrote, was that “[t]he First Amendment requires that we pr...","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805946","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48862510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1805982
Anthony L. Fargo
One of the enduring controversies of the United States Constitution is what the writers meant by those four words in the First Amendment that Justice Potter Stewart used as the title of his 1974 sp...
{"title":"Stewart, Potter. “Or of the Press,” 26 Hastings L. J. 631 (1975)","authors":"Anthony L. Fargo","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805982","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805982","url":null,"abstract":"One of the enduring controversies of the United States Constitution is what the writers meant by those four words in the First Amendment that Justice Potter Stewart used as the title of his 1974 sp...","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805982","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42434738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1805950
Charles N. Davis
Students new to the study of First Amendment law often grapple with the complexity and ambiguity of its parameters, a sensation familiar to all who encounter legal analysis and scholarship for the ...
{"title":"Meiklejohn, Alexander. The First Amendment is an Absolute, 1961 Sup. Ct. Rev. 245","authors":"Charles N. Davis","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805950","url":null,"abstract":"Students new to the study of First Amendment law often grapple with the complexity and ambiguity of its parameters, a sensation familiar to all who encounter legal analysis and scholarship for the ...","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805950","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45793106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944
A. Sanders
In the decade following World War I, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a number of influential cases involving outspoken speakers, whose ideas were often less than popular. Against this backdrop, Justice Louis Brandeis introduced civic courage – the notion that public discussion of important issues is a political duty even when those ideas run counter to the status quo. Using his approach, this essay calls upon our most-established communication law scholars, asserting they are duty-bound to push our field and our scholarship forward. It outlines four areas in which we must undertake profound change to ensure the intellectual vibrancy of our scholarship and meaningfully commit to diversity and inclusion. By its very nature, ours must be a field that welcomes a robust exchange of ideas and viewpoints. It is past time to abandon the staid norms of First Amendment exceptionalism and traditional thinking about communication law.
{"title":"Looking Forward by Looking Backward: Brandeis’ Concurrence in Whitney v. California and the Future of Communication Law Scholarship","authors":"A. Sanders","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944","url":null,"abstract":"In the decade following World War I, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a number of influential cases involving outspoken speakers, whose ideas were often less than popular. Against this backdrop, Justice Louis Brandeis introduced civic courage – the notion that public discussion of important issues is a political duty even when those ideas run counter to the status quo. Using his approach, this essay calls upon our most-established communication law scholars, asserting they are duty-bound to push our field and our scholarship forward. It outlines four areas in which we must undertake profound change to ensure the intellectual vibrancy of our scholarship and meaningfully commit to diversity and inclusion. By its very nature, ours must be a field that welcomes a robust exchange of ideas and viewpoints. It is past time to abandon the staid norms of First Amendment exceptionalism and traditional thinking about communication law.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48969671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1805984
Cayce Myers
In late nineteenth century America, there were limited legal remedies when a person’s information or image was taken by people without permission. Sometimes a person did not even know that personal...
{"title":"Warren, Samuel & Louis Brandeis. The Right to Privacy, 4 Harv. L. Rev. 193 (1890)","authors":"Cayce Myers","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805984","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805984","url":null,"abstract":"In late nineteenth century America, there were limited legal remedies when a person’s information or image was taken by people without permission. Sometimes a person did not even know that personal...","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805984","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47019380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1805948
{"title":"MacKinnon, Catharine A. Pornography, Civil Rights, and Speech, 20 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 1 (1985)","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805948","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805948","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805948","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43009929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1805957
{"title":"Nimmer, Melville B. The Right of Publicity, 19 Law & Contemp. Probs. 203 (1954)","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805957","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805957","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805957","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42542823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2020-10-01DOI: 10.1080/10811680.2020.1805978
K. Youm
Communication law as a whole and media law in particular tend to be country-specific rather than international or comparative. But the global twenty-first century makes us in communication law more...
{"title":"Schauer, Frederick. Social Foundations of the Law of Defamation: A Comparative Analysis, 1 J. Media L. & Prac. 3 (1980)","authors":"K. Youm","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805978","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805978","url":null,"abstract":"Communication law as a whole and media law in particular tend to be country-specific rather than international or comparative. But the global twenty-first century makes us in communication law more...","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805978","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48758292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：