Jason Shames, Adrien Nguyen, Maria Sciotto, Lisa Zorn, Theresa Kaufman, Annina Wilkes, Alexander Sevrukov, Chhavi Kaushik, Ripple Patel, Suzanne Pascarella, Ashlee Byrd, Lydia Liao
Objective: To assess the positive predictive value-3 (PPV3) and negative predictive value (NPV) of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) when added to the diagnostic workup of suspicious breast findings.
Methods: This prospective study was IRB approved. We recruited 99 women with abnormal findings on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and/or US to undergo CEM prior to biopsy. Based on final pathology outcomes, PPV3 and NPV were calculated and compared using N-1 chi-squared tests with P-values and 95% CIs.
Results: Final pathologic outcome yielded 56.6% (56/99) benign, 5.1% (5/99) benign with upgrade potential (BWUP), and 38.4% (38/99) malignant lesions. Final pathologic outcomes for the 63 positive CEMs yielded 33.3% (21/63) benign, 6.3% (4/63) BWUP, and 60.3% (38/63) malignant lesions. Adding CEM to the diagnostic workup significantly increased PPV3 from 38.4% (38/99) to 60.3% (38/63) (P <.01; 95% CI, 6.1-36.2). Negative predictive value was 100% (36/36) for CEM, 92.9% (13/14; P = .1; 95% CI, -4.2 to 31.4) for DBT, and 75.9% (22/29; P <.05; 95% CI, 8.8-42.1) for US. The number of unnecessary biopsies could be reduced by 36.4% (from 100% [99/99] to 63.6% [63/99]).
Conclusion: Adding CEM to the diagnostic workup of suspicious breast findings could improve PPV3 to prevent unnecessary biopsies.
目的评估对比增强乳腺 X 线造影术(CEM)在对可疑乳腺检查结果进行诊断时的阳性预测值-3(PPV3)和阴性预测值(NPV):这项前瞻性研究已获得 IRB 批准。我们招募了 99 名数字乳腺断层扫描(DBT)和/或 US 检查结果异常的女性,让她们在活检前接受 CEM 检查。根据最终病理结果计算PPV3和NPV,并使用N-1卡方检验比较P值和95% CI:最终病理结果显示,良性病变占 56.6%(56/99),良性病变占 5.1%(5/99),恶性病变占 38.4%(38/99)。63 例 CEM 阳性病例的最终病理结果为:33.3%(21/63)良性、6.3%(4/63)BWUP 和 60.3%(38/63)恶性病变。在诊断检查中加入 CEM 可使 PPV3 从 38.4%(38/99)显著增加到 60.3%(38/63)(P 结论:在诊断检查中加入 CEM 可使 PPV3 从 38.4%(38/99)显著增加到 60.3%(38/63)):在可疑乳腺检查结果的诊断工作中加入 CEM 可提高 PPV3,避免不必要的活检。
{"title":"Can Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Improve Positive Predictive Value for Diagnostic Workup of Suspicious Findings? A Single-Arm Prospective Study.","authors":"Jason Shames, Adrien Nguyen, Maria Sciotto, Lisa Zorn, Theresa Kaufman, Annina Wilkes, Alexander Sevrukov, Chhavi Kaushik, Ripple Patel, Suzanne Pascarella, Ashlee Byrd, Lydia Liao","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae081","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbae081","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the positive predictive value-3 (PPV3) and negative predictive value (NPV) of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) when added to the diagnostic workup of suspicious breast findings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study was IRB approved. We recruited 99 women with abnormal findings on digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and/or US to undergo CEM prior to biopsy. Based on final pathology outcomes, PPV3 and NPV were calculated and compared using N-1 chi-squared tests with P-values and 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Final pathologic outcome yielded 56.6% (56/99) benign, 5.1% (5/99) benign with upgrade potential (BWUP), and 38.4% (38/99) malignant lesions. Final pathologic outcomes for the 63 positive CEMs yielded 33.3% (21/63) benign, 6.3% (4/63) BWUP, and 60.3% (38/63) malignant lesions. Adding CEM to the diagnostic workup significantly increased PPV3 from 38.4% (38/99) to 60.3% (38/63) (P <.01; 95% CI, 6.1-36.2). Negative predictive value was 100% (36/36) for CEM, 92.9% (13/14; P = .1; 95% CI, -4.2 to 31.4) for DBT, and 75.9% (22/29; P <.05; 95% CI, 8.8-42.1) for US. The number of unnecessary biopsies could be reduced by 36.4% (from 100% [99/99] to 63.6% [63/99]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding CEM to the diagnostic workup of suspicious breast findings could improve PPV3 to prevent unnecessary biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"280-290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142717590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amrita R Valluri, Gloria J Carter, Inna Robrahn, Wendie A Berg
Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are invasive carcinomas that lack ER and PR expression and also lack amplification or overexpression of HER2. Triple-negative breast cancers are histopathologically diverse, with the majority classified as invasive breast carcinomas of no special type with a basal-like profile. Triple-negative breast cancer is the most aggressive molecular subtype of invasive breast carcinoma, with the highest rates of stage-matched mortality and regional recurrence. Triple-negative breast cancer has a younger median age of diagnosis than other molecular subtypes and is disproportionately diagnosed in Black women and BRCA1 germline pathogenic mutation carriers. On US and mammography, TNBCs are most often seen as a noncircumscribed mass without calcifications; TNBCs can have circumscribed margins and mimic a cyst or have probably benign features that may result in delayed diagnosis. MRI is the most sensitive modality for detecting TNBC, with rim enhancement being a common feature, and MRI is also the most accurate imaging for assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Understanding the radiologic and pathologic findings of TNBC can aid in diagnosis.
{"title":"Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation.","authors":"Amrita R Valluri, Gloria J Carter, Inna Robrahn, Wendie A Berg","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae085","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbae085","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are invasive carcinomas that lack ER and PR expression and also lack amplification or overexpression of HER2. Triple-negative breast cancers are histopathologically diverse, with the majority classified as invasive breast carcinomas of no special type with a basal-like profile. Triple-negative breast cancer is the most aggressive molecular subtype of invasive breast carcinoma, with the highest rates of stage-matched mortality and regional recurrence. Triple-negative breast cancer has a younger median age of diagnosis than other molecular subtypes and is disproportionately diagnosed in Black women and BRCA1 germline pathogenic mutation carriers. On US and mammography, TNBCs are most often seen as a noncircumscribed mass without calcifications; TNBCs can have circumscribed margins and mimic a cyst or have probably benign features that may result in delayed diagnosis. MRI is the most sensitive modality for detecting TNBC, with rim enhancement being a common feature, and MRI is also the most accurate imaging for assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. Understanding the radiologic and pathologic findings of TNBC can aid in diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"331-344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142972654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ria Dawar, Lars J Grimm, Emily B Sonnenblick, Brian N Dontchos, Kristen Coffey, Sally Goudreau, Beatriu Reig, Sarah A Jacobs, Zeeshan Shah, Lisa Mullen, Vandana Dialani, Reema Dawar, James Sayre, Katerina Dodelzon, Jay R Parikh, Hannah S Milch
Objective: Assess current practices and plans regarding home workstations and remote diagnostic breast imaging in the United States.
Methods: A 43-question survey relating to remote breast imaging was distributed to Society of Breast Imaging members from July 6, 2023, through August 2, 2023. A descriptive summary of responses was performed. Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare demographic variables of respondents and questions of interest.
Results: In total, 424 surveys were completed (response rate 13%, 424/3244). One-third of breast imaging radiologists (31%, 132/424) reported reading examinations from home or a personal remote site for a median of 25% of their clinical time. The most common types of examinations read from home were screening mammography (90%, 119/132), screening US (58%, 77/132), diagnostic mammography and MRI (both 53%, 70/132), and diagnostic US (49%, 65/132). Respondents from private practices were more likely than those from academic practices to read diagnostic imaging from home (67%, 35/52 vs 29%, 15/52; P <.001). Respondents practicing in the West were less likely to read breast imaging examinations from home compared with those in other geographic regions (18%, 12/67 vs 28%-43% for other regions; P = .023). No differences were found among respondents' overall use of home workstations based on age, gender, or having dependents. Most respondents (75%, 318/424) felt that remote breast reading would be a significant practice pattern in the future.
Conclusion: Home workstations for mammography and remote diagnostic breast imaging are a considerable U.S. practice pattern. Further research should explore radiologist preferences regarding remote breast imaging and its impact on clinical care and radiologist well-being.
目的:评估目前在美国家庭工作站和远程诊断乳房成像的做法和计划。方法:从2023年7月6日至2023年8月2日,向美国乳腺成像学会会员发放了一份包含43个问题的关于远程乳腺成像的调查问卷。对回答进行了描述性总结。使用皮尔逊卡方检验比较被调查者的人口学变量和感兴趣的问题。结果:共完成问卷调查424份(回复率13%,424/3244)。三分之一的乳腺成像放射科医生(31%,132/424)报告在家中或个人远程站点阅读检查的中位数为25%的临床时间。最常见的在家检查类型是乳房x光筛查(90%,119/132)、超声筛查(58%,77/132)、诊断性乳房x光检查和MRI(均为53%,70/132)和诊断性超声检查(49%,65/132)。来自私人诊所的受访者比来自学术诊所的受访者更有可能在家阅读诊断成像(67%,35/52 vs 29%, 15/52;结论:家庭工作站的乳房x线摄影和远程诊断乳房成像是相当大的美国实践模式。进一步的研究应该探讨放射科医生对远程乳房成像的偏好及其对临床护理和放射科医生健康的影响。
{"title":"Mammography Home Workstations and Remote Diagnostic Breast Imaging: Current Practice Patterns and Planned Future Directions.","authors":"Ria Dawar, Lars J Grimm, Emily B Sonnenblick, Brian N Dontchos, Kristen Coffey, Sally Goudreau, Beatriu Reig, Sarah A Jacobs, Zeeshan Shah, Lisa Mullen, Vandana Dialani, Reema Dawar, James Sayre, Katerina Dodelzon, Jay R Parikh, Hannah S Milch","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae087","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbae087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess current practices and plans regarding home workstations and remote diagnostic breast imaging in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 43-question survey relating to remote breast imaging was distributed to Society of Breast Imaging members from July 6, 2023, through August 2, 2023. A descriptive summary of responses was performed. Pearson's chi-squared test was used to compare demographic variables of respondents and questions of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 424 surveys were completed (response rate 13%, 424/3244). One-third of breast imaging radiologists (31%, 132/424) reported reading examinations from home or a personal remote site for a median of 25% of their clinical time. The most common types of examinations read from home were screening mammography (90%, 119/132), screening US (58%, 77/132), diagnostic mammography and MRI (both 53%, 70/132), and diagnostic US (49%, 65/132). Respondents from private practices were more likely than those from academic practices to read diagnostic imaging from home (67%, 35/52 vs 29%, 15/52; P <.001). Respondents practicing in the West were less likely to read breast imaging examinations from home compared with those in other geographic regions (18%, 12/67 vs 28%-43% for other regions; P = .023). No differences were found among respondents' overall use of home workstations based on age, gender, or having dependents. Most respondents (75%, 318/424) felt that remote breast reading would be a significant practice pattern in the future.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Home workstations for mammography and remote diagnostic breast imaging are a considerable U.S. practice pattern. Further research should explore radiologist preferences regarding remote breast imaging and its impact on clinical care and radiologist well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"291-300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086084/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143123747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Joanna Rossi, Leslie Cho, Mary S Newell, Luz A Venta, Guy H Montgomery, Stamatia V Destounis, Linda Moy, Rachel F Brem, Chirag Parghi, Laurie R Margolies
Identifying systemic disease with medical imaging studies may improve population health outcomes. Although the pathogenesis of peripheral arterial calcification and coronary artery calcification differ, breast arterial calcification (BAC) on mammography is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), a leading cause of death in women. While professional society guidelines on the reporting or management of BAC have not yet been established, and assessment and quantification methods are not yet standardized, the value of reporting BAC is being considered internationally as a possible indicator of subclinical CVD. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) models are being developed to identify and quantify BAC on mammography, as well as to predict the risk of CVD. This review outlines studies evaluating the association of BAC and CVD, introduces the role of preventative cardiology in clinical management, discusses reasons to consider reporting BAC, acknowledges current knowledge gaps and barriers to assessing and reporting calcifications, and provides examples of how AI can be utilized to measure BAC and contribute to cardiovascular risk assessment. Ultimately, reporting BAC on mammography might facilitate earlier mitigation of cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic women.
{"title":"Breast Arterial Calcifications on Mammography: A Review of the Literature.","authors":"Joanna Rossi, Leslie Cho, Mary S Newell, Luz A Venta, Guy H Montgomery, Stamatia V Destounis, Linda Moy, Rachel F Brem, Chirag Parghi, Laurie R Margolies","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf009","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying systemic disease with medical imaging studies may improve population health outcomes. Although the pathogenesis of peripheral arterial calcification and coronary artery calcification differ, breast arterial calcification (BAC) on mammography is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), a leading cause of death in women. While professional society guidelines on the reporting or management of BAC have not yet been established, and assessment and quantification methods are not yet standardized, the value of reporting BAC is being considered internationally as a possible indicator of subclinical CVD. Furthermore, artificial intelligence (AI) models are being developed to identify and quantify BAC on mammography, as well as to predict the risk of CVD. This review outlines studies evaluating the association of BAC and CVD, introduces the role of preventative cardiology in clinical management, discusses reasons to consider reporting BAC, acknowledges current knowledge gaps and barriers to assessing and reporting calcifications, and provides examples of how AI can be utilized to measure BAC and contribute to cardiovascular risk assessment. Ultimately, reporting BAC on mammography might facilitate earlier mitigation of cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic women.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"268-279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086085/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143755013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Unknown Case: Pediatric Breast Mass.","authors":"Damien Medrano, Samantha Zuckerman","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144019655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To determine the upgrade rate of exclusively MRI-detected benign papillomas in asymptomatic high-risk patients, patients with a history of cancer, or patients with known malignancy.
Methods: This IRB-approved retrospective study reviewed all breast MRI-guided biopsies yielding papilloma on pathology for all asymptomatic patients undergoing breast MRI for high-risk screening, newly diagnosed breast cancer, or a personal history of breast cancer. All cases were followed by excision or 2-year imaging follow-up. The upgrade rate was determined. Fisher's exact test was used to determine the significance of associated factors, including lesion type, lesion size, and ipsilateral malignancy.
Results: Of the 258 MRI-guided biopsies, 117 met the inclusion criteria. A 4% (5/117) upgrade rate was found with a 3% (4/117) upgrade rate to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and a 1% (1/117) upgrade rate to invasive malignancy for all identified papillomas. When evaluating all papillomas, the only associated feature identified to be statically significant for risk of upgrade was ipsilateral malignancy with a 60% (3/5) upgrade rate with a P-value of .0057. When separately evaluating benign papillomas only by excluding those with atypia or additional high-risk lesion at biopsy, a 4% (3/80) upgrade rate to DCIS was found. There was no upgrade to invasive malignancy.
Conclusion: Upgrade of MRI-detected papillomas in asymptomatic high-risk patients, patients with a history of cancer, or patients with known malignancy is 4% in this population, which suggests these lesions may warrant surgical excision.
{"title":"Upgrade Rate of Exclusively MRI-Detected Papillomas in Asymptomatic Patients Undergoing Screening or Extent of Disease Examinations.","authors":"Kathryn Watts Zamora, Ceren Yalniz, Kudratjot Brar, Yufeng Li, Stefanie Zalasin, Stefanie Woodard","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae080","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbae080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the upgrade rate of exclusively MRI-detected benign papillomas in asymptomatic high-risk patients, patients with a history of cancer, or patients with known malignancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This IRB-approved retrospective study reviewed all breast MRI-guided biopsies yielding papilloma on pathology for all asymptomatic patients undergoing breast MRI for high-risk screening, newly diagnosed breast cancer, or a personal history of breast cancer. All cases were followed by excision or 2-year imaging follow-up. The upgrade rate was determined. Fisher's exact test was used to determine the significance of associated factors, including lesion type, lesion size, and ipsilateral malignancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 258 MRI-guided biopsies, 117 met the inclusion criteria. A 4% (5/117) upgrade rate was found with a 3% (4/117) upgrade rate to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and a 1% (1/117) upgrade rate to invasive malignancy for all identified papillomas. When evaluating all papillomas, the only associated feature identified to be statically significant for risk of upgrade was ipsilateral malignancy with a 60% (3/5) upgrade rate with a P-value of .0057. When separately evaluating benign papillomas only by excluding those with atypia or additional high-risk lesion at biopsy, a 4% (3/80) upgrade rate to DCIS was found. There was no upgrade to invasive malignancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upgrade of MRI-detected papillomas in asymptomatic high-risk patients, patients with a history of cancer, or patients with known malignancy is 4% in this population, which suggests these lesions may warrant surgical excision.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"196-203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142847911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Asha A Bhatt, Laura K Harper, Sarah Anderson, Malvika H Solanki, Dana K Ataya
Cystic breast masses are a common entity encountered by breast radiologists. The imaging features of benign and malignant cystic masses may overlap, causing confusion and miscategorization with the potential to produce diagnostic delay and harm. This article provides a review of key differentiating imaging features that help guide appropriate mass characterization and treatment.
{"title":"Cystic Breast Disease: What to Do When It's Not So Cystic.","authors":"Asha A Bhatt, Laura K Harper, Sarah Anderson, Malvika H Solanki, Dana K Ataya","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae079","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbae079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cystic breast masses are a common entity encountered by breast radiologists. The imaging features of benign and malignant cystic masses may overlap, causing confusion and miscategorization with the potential to produce diagnostic delay and harm. This article provides a review of key differentiating imaging features that help guide appropriate mass characterization and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"233-248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142985009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Serena Pacilè, Pauline Germaine, Caroline Sclafert, Thomas Bertinotti, Pierre Fillard, Svati Singla Long
Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been shown to hold promise for improving breast cancer screening, offering advanced capabilities to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a multimodal multi-instant AI-based system on the diagnostic performance of radiologists in interpreting mammograms.
Methods: We designed a multireader multicase study taking into account the evaluation of both interpretive and noninterpretive tasks. The study was approved by an institutional review board and is compliant with HIPAA. The dataset included 90 cancer-proven and 150 negative cases. The overall diagnostic performance was compared between the unaided vs aided reading condition. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Fleiss's kappa, and accuracy were used to quantify the agreement and performance on noninterpretive tasks. Reading time and perceived fatigue were used as comprehensive metrics to assess the efficiency of readers.
Results: The average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased by 7.4% (95% CI, 4.5%-10%) with the concurrent assistance of the AI system (P <.001). On average, readers found 8% more cancers in the assisted reading condition. The ICC went from 0.6 (95% CI, 0.55-0.65) in the unassisted condition to 0.74 (95% CI, 0.70-0.78) for readings done with AI (P <.001). An overall decrease of 24% in reading time and a reduction in perceived fatigue was also found.
Conclusion: The incorporation of this AI system, capable of handling multiple image type, prior mammograms, and multiple outputs, improved the diagnostic proficiency of radiologists in identifying breast cancer while also reducing the time required for combined interpretive and noninterpretive tasks.
目的:人工智能(AI)已被证明有望改善乳腺癌筛查,提供了提高诊断准确性和效率的先进功能。本研究旨在评估基于人工智能的多模态多即时系统对放射科医生判读乳房 X 线照片诊断性能的影响:我们设计了一项多阅读器多病例研究,其中考虑到了对判读任务和非判读任务的评估。该研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准,并符合 HIPAA 标准。数据集包括 90 个癌症确诊病例和 150 个阴性病例。比较了无助读与有助读条件下的总体诊断性能。类内相关系数(ICC)、弗莱斯卡帕(Fleiss's kappa)和准确度用于量化非解释性任务的一致性和表现。阅读时间和感知疲劳被用作评估读者效率的综合指标:结果:在人工智能系统的辅助下,接收者工作特征曲线下的平均面积增加了 7.4%(95% CI,4.5%-10%)(P 结论:人工智能系统的加入使阅读者的工作效率得到了提高:该人工智能系统能够处理多种图像类型、先前的乳房 X 光检查和多种输出,它的加入提高了放射科医生识别乳腺癌的诊断能力,同时也减少了综合判读和非判读任务所需的时间。
{"title":"Evaluation of a Multi-Instant Multimodal Artificial Intelligence System Supporting Interpretive and Noninterpretive Functions.","authors":"Serena Pacilè, Pauline Germaine, Caroline Sclafert, Thomas Bertinotti, Pierre Fillard, Svati Singla Long","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae062","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbae062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) has been shown to hold promise for improving breast cancer screening, offering advanced capabilities to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a multimodal multi-instant AI-based system on the diagnostic performance of radiologists in interpreting mammograms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed a multireader multicase study taking into account the evaluation of both interpretive and noninterpretive tasks. The study was approved by an institutional review board and is compliant with HIPAA. The dataset included 90 cancer-proven and 150 negative cases. The overall diagnostic performance was compared between the unaided vs aided reading condition. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Fleiss's kappa, and accuracy were used to quantify the agreement and performance on noninterpretive tasks. Reading time and perceived fatigue were used as comprehensive metrics to assess the efficiency of readers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased by 7.4% (95% CI, 4.5%-10%) with the concurrent assistance of the AI system (P <.001). On average, readers found 8% more cancers in the assisted reading condition. The ICC went from 0.6 (95% CI, 0.55-0.65) in the unassisted condition to 0.74 (95% CI, 0.70-0.78) for readings done with AI (P <.001). An overall decrease of 24% in reading time and a reduction in perceived fatigue was also found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incorporation of this AI system, capable of handling multiple image type, prior mammograms, and multiple outputs, improved the diagnostic proficiency of radiologists in identifying breast cancer while also reducing the time required for combined interpretive and noninterpretive tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"155-164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142740890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Breast radiologists have high rates of burnout. Some contributing factors include the sedentary nature of the occupation, reading room design and isolation associated with higher volumes, and increased remote interpretation. Reading rooms can also be filled with numerous distractions and produce conditions that do not support optimal workflow. Identifying and addressing these issues may help prolong physician careers and increase overall productivity. This article presents approaches to improve wellness for breast imaging radiologists and reduce the overall rate of burnout.
{"title":"Improving Wellness Through Reading Room Design and Flexible Scheduling Options.","authors":"Hamad Muhammad, Millie Puglia, Stephanie Colvin, Stefanie Zalasin, Ceren Yalniz, Kathryn W Zamora, Stefanie Woodard","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae094","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbae094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast radiologists have high rates of burnout. Some contributing factors include the sedentary nature of the occupation, reading room design and isolation associated with higher volumes, and increased remote interpretation. Reading rooms can also be filled with numerous distractions and produce conditions that do not support optimal workflow. Identifying and addressing these issues may help prolong physician careers and increase overall productivity. This article presents approaches to improve wellness for breast imaging radiologists and reduce the overall rate of burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"214-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143042403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: The development of abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) protocols reduce scan times. This paper reports the performance of AB-MRI at a tertiary care public academic medical center in comparison with established literature.
Methods: This HIPAA-compliant IRB-approved retrospective study reviewed 413 AB-MRI screenings in high-risk patients from June 2020 to March 2023. Data were collected from 3 databases (MagView, Cerner PowerChart, and Prism Primordial). Demographics and overall BI-RADS assessment were recorded. For all positive (BI-RADS 0, 3, 4, 5) examinations, manual review of each case was performed. Performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, cancer detection rate [CDR], recall rate, positive predictive value [PPV] 3 and negative predictive value [NPV]) were calculated. PubMed and Google Scholar were used to review similar AB-MRI studies to compare performance metrics.
Results: There were 413 AB-MRI examinations from 413 unique patients. The majority of cases were audit-negative BI-RADS 1 or 2 (83.8%, 346/413). There were 67 (16.2%, 67/413) audit-positive cases with 3.6% (15/413) BI-RADS 3, 10.9% (45/413) BI-RADS 4, 0.7% (3/413) BI-RADS 5, and 1.0% (4/413) BI-RADS 0. Performance metrics showed a sensitivity of 100.0% (95% CI, 63.1%-100.0%) and a specificity of 85.7% (95% CI, 81.9%-88.9%). The PPV3 was 14.3% (95% CI, 5.1%-23.5%), and the NPV was 100.0% (95% CI, 99.0%-100.0%). The CDR was 19.4 per 1000 screenings. The results are comparable to prior literature and benchmark data.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates high sensitivity (100.0%) and NPV (100.0%) of AB-MRI with comparable specificity (85.7%) and CDR (19.4/1000) to the literature, adding support to the use of AB-MRI. Further research is needed to optimize AB-MRI protocols.
{"title":"Performance of Abbreviated Breast MRI in High-Risk Patients in a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Tamara Zaza, Kapil Chandora, Ceren Yalniz, Kathryn Watts Zamora, Stefanie Zalasin, Yufeng Li, Stefanie Woodard","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae071","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbae071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The development of abbreviated breast MRI (AB-MRI) protocols reduce scan times. This paper reports the performance of AB-MRI at a tertiary care public academic medical center in comparison with established literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This HIPAA-compliant IRB-approved retrospective study reviewed 413 AB-MRI screenings in high-risk patients from June 2020 to March 2023. Data were collected from 3 databases (MagView, Cerner PowerChart, and Prism Primordial). Demographics and overall BI-RADS assessment were recorded. For all positive (BI-RADS 0, 3, 4, 5) examinations, manual review of each case was performed. Performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, cancer detection rate [CDR], recall rate, positive predictive value [PPV] 3 and negative predictive value [NPV]) were calculated. PubMed and Google Scholar were used to review similar AB-MRI studies to compare performance metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 413 AB-MRI examinations from 413 unique patients. The majority of cases were audit-negative BI-RADS 1 or 2 (83.8%, 346/413). There were 67 (16.2%, 67/413) audit-positive cases with 3.6% (15/413) BI-RADS 3, 10.9% (45/413) BI-RADS 4, 0.7% (3/413) BI-RADS 5, and 1.0% (4/413) BI-RADS 0. Performance metrics showed a sensitivity of 100.0% (95% CI, 63.1%-100.0%) and a specificity of 85.7% (95% CI, 81.9%-88.9%). The PPV3 was 14.3% (95% CI, 5.1%-23.5%), and the NPV was 100.0% (95% CI, 99.0%-100.0%). The CDR was 19.4 per 1000 screenings. The results are comparable to prior literature and benchmark data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates high sensitivity (100.0%) and NPV (100.0%) of AB-MRI with comparable specificity (85.7%) and CDR (19.4/1000) to the literature, adding support to the use of AB-MRI. Further research is needed to optimize AB-MRI protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"177-186"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629794","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}