首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Breast Imaging最新文献

英文 中文
Cleanliness Technique in Breast and Axillary Image-Guided Procedures: Best Practices to Minimize Infection. 乳腺和腋窝影像引导手术中的清洁技术:减少感染的最佳实践。
IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaf037
Katerina Dodelzon, Santo Maimone, Kristen Coffey, Kathryn Zamora, Lars J Grimm

Breast image-guided procedures play a critical role in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer, serving as the gold standard for tissue sampling and preoperative localization. These minimally invasive procedures carry a very low risk of complications, with postprocedural infections occurring in fewer than 0.2% of cases. However, given the high volume of breast interventions performed annually, the potential impact of infections remains significant. Despite this, published guidelines addressing procedural cleanliness techniques in breast imaging are sparse and often provide conflicting recommendations, leading to variability in clinical practice and resource utilization. The lack of clear and specific guidance creates challenges for radiologists navigating institutional policies and best practice implementation. This review synthesizes existing standards and guidelines, evaluating the supporting evidence to propose an evidence-based best practice approach for maintaining clean techniques in breast image-guided procedures. By standardizing cleanliness protocols, we aim to enhance patient care, optimize procedural success, and promote consistency across breast imaging practices.

乳房图像引导程序在乳腺癌的诊断和治疗中起着至关重要的作用,是组织采样和术前定位的金标准。这些微创手术的并发症风险非常低,术后感染发生率不到0.2%。然而,鉴于每年进行的大量乳房干预,感染的潜在影响仍然很大。尽管如此,已发表的关于乳腺成像程序清洁技术的指南很少,并且经常提供相互矛盾的建议,导致临床实践和资源利用的变化。缺乏明确和具体的指导给放射科医生导航机构政策和最佳实践实施带来了挑战。本综述综合了现有的标准和指南,评估了支持证据,提出了一种基于证据的最佳实践方法,以保持乳房图像引导手术的清洁技术。通过标准化清洁协议,我们的目标是加强患者护理,优化程序成功,并促进乳房成像实践的一致性。
{"title":"Cleanliness Technique in Breast and Axillary Image-Guided Procedures: Best Practices to Minimize Infection.","authors":"Katerina Dodelzon, Santo Maimone, Kristen Coffey, Kathryn Zamora, Lars J Grimm","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast image-guided procedures play a critical role in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer, serving as the gold standard for tissue sampling and preoperative localization. These minimally invasive procedures carry a very low risk of complications, with postprocedural infections occurring in fewer than 0.2% of cases. However, given the high volume of breast interventions performed annually, the potential impact of infections remains significant. Despite this, published guidelines addressing procedural cleanliness techniques in breast imaging are sparse and often provide conflicting recommendations, leading to variability in clinical practice and resource utilization. The lack of clear and specific guidance creates challenges for radiologists navigating institutional policies and best practice implementation. This review synthesizes existing standards and guidelines, evaluating the supporting evidence to propose an evidence-based best practice approach for maintaining clean techniques in breast image-guided procedures. By standardizing cleanliness protocols, we aim to enhance patient care, optimize procedural success, and promote consistency across breast imaging practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":"7 5","pages":"592-598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145379299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Breast Cancer Screening and Solid Organ Transplantation. 乳腺癌筛查和实体器官移植。
IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaf016
Nina Capiro, James S Chalfant

Solid organ transplantation volumes in the United States have been steadily increasing over the past decade. Rigorous evaluation of potential transplant recipients must be performed to ensure appropriate allocation of solid organs for transplant. Because active malignancy is a contraindication for most solid organ transplantations, appropriate cancer screening should be included as part of the pretransplant assessment for both potential transplant recipients and donors. This article provides a summary of the current state of solid organ transplant-related breast cancer screening in the United States.

在过去的十年里,美国的实体器官移植量一直在稳步增长。必须对潜在的移植受者进行严格的评估,以确保适当分配用于移植的实体器官。由于活动性恶性肿瘤是大多数实体器官移植的禁忌症,适当的癌症筛查应作为移植前评估的一部分,包括潜在的移植受体和供体。本文概述了美国实体器官移植相关乳腺癌筛查的现状。
{"title":"Breast Cancer Screening and Solid Organ Transplantation.","authors":"Nina Capiro, James S Chalfant","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf016","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Solid organ transplantation volumes in the United States have been steadily increasing over the past decade. Rigorous evaluation of potential transplant recipients must be performed to ensure appropriate allocation of solid organs for transplant. Because active malignancy is a contraindication for most solid organ transplantations, appropriate cancer screening should be included as part of the pretransplant assessment for both potential transplant recipients and donors. This article provides a summary of the current state of solid organ transplant-related breast cancer screening in the United States.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"513-519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144019654","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Breaking the Ice: Are Online Patient Educational Materials on Breast Cryoablation Readable and Understandable? 打破坚冰:乳房冷冻消融的在线患者教育材料可读且可理解吗?
IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaf024
Simon Kidanemariam, Antonio R Lopez, Grayson L Baird, Robert C Ward, Joey Z Gu, John McMenamy, Randy C Miles

Objective: Online patient education materials (OPEMs) provide valuable information on breast-related conditions and treatment options. We evaluated commonly accessed OPEMs related to breast cryoablation to assess the readability, understandability, and actionability metrics of educational materials available to patients.

Methods: Using Google, the terms "breast cryoablation," "breast cryosurgery," and "breast cryotherapy" were queried. The top 50 websites providing OPEMs for the general public were identified by search ranking. A virtual private network was used, and location tracking, cookies, and user account information were disabled before querying. Sponsored content and research journal articles were excluded. Websites were categorized as academic/hospital, commercial, or nonprofit based on the hosting organization. Online patient education materials from the top 50 sites were downloaded and assessed for readability, understandability, and actionability. Mixed modeling, with sources nested within readability scores (automated readability, Coleman-Liau, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook), was used to evaluate these metrics.

Results: Among 52 websites, the overall mean grade-level readability was 12.3 (95% CI, 11.1-13.6). Academic/hospital sites had the lowest readability at 11.8, followed by nonprofit at 12.4 and commercial at 12.7 (P = .03). The mean understandability score was 71%, with academic/hospital sites at 81%, commercial at 73%, and nonprofit at 25%. Only 2 websites-Serenity Surgery and Cleveland Clinic-demonstrated actionability. Overall actionability was 18.5% (95% CI, 7.5%-38.9%), with 24 websites scoring 0% for actionability.

Conclusion: Current OPEMs concerning breast cryoablation fall short of the American Medical Association's recommendations for health literacy, averaging twice that level. Additionally, there is significant variability in the materials' understandability and actionability.

目的:在线患者教育材料(OPEMs)提供有关乳房相关疾病和治疗方案的宝贵信息。我们评估了常用的与乳房冷冻消融相关的OPEMs,以评估患者可用的教育材料的可读性、可理解性和可操作性指标。方法:使用谷歌对“乳腺冷冻消融”、“乳腺冷冻手术”、“乳腺冷冻治疗”进行查询。通过搜索排名确定了为公众提供OPEMs的前50个网站。使用了虚拟专用网,在查询前禁用了位置跟踪、cookie和用户帐户信息。赞助内容和研究期刊文章被排除在外。根据托管机构的不同,网站被分为学术/医院、商业或非营利三类。从排名前50位的网站下载在线患者教育材料,并对其可读性、可理解性和可操作性进行评估。混合建模,在可读性评分(自动可读性,Coleman-Liau, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook)中嵌套源,被用来评估这些指标。结果:在52个网站中,总体平均年级水平可读性为12.3 (95% CI, 11.1-13.6)。学术/医院网站的可读性最低,为11.8,其次是非营利网站,为12.4,商业网站为12.7 (P = 0.03)。平均可理解性得分为71%,其中学术/医院网站为81%,商业网站为73%,非营利网站为25%。只有两个网站——宁静外科和克利夫兰诊所——证明了可操作性。总体可操作性为18.5% (95% CI, 7.5%-38.9%), 24个网站可操作性得分为0%。结论:目前关于乳房冷冻消融的OPEMs未达到美国医学协会建议的健康素养水平,平均为该水平的两倍。此外,在材料的可理解性和可操作性方面存在显著的可变性。
{"title":"Breaking the Ice: Are Online Patient Educational Materials on Breast Cryoablation Readable and Understandable?","authors":"Simon Kidanemariam, Antonio R Lopez, Grayson L Baird, Robert C Ward, Joey Z Gu, John McMenamy, Randy C Miles","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf024","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Online patient education materials (OPEMs) provide valuable information on breast-related conditions and treatment options. We evaluated commonly accessed OPEMs related to breast cryoablation to assess the readability, understandability, and actionability metrics of educational materials available to patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Google, the terms \"breast cryoablation,\" \"breast cryosurgery,\" and \"breast cryotherapy\" were queried. The top 50 websites providing OPEMs for the general public were identified by search ranking. A virtual private network was used, and location tracking, cookies, and user account information were disabled before querying. Sponsored content and research journal articles were excluded. Websites were categorized as academic/hospital, commercial, or nonprofit based on the hosting organization. Online patient education materials from the top 50 sites were downloaded and assessed for readability, understandability, and actionability. Mixed modeling, with sources nested within readability scores (automated readability, Coleman-Liau, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook), was used to evaluate these metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 52 websites, the overall mean grade-level readability was 12.3 (95% CI, 11.1-13.6). Academic/hospital sites had the lowest readability at 11.8, followed by nonprofit at 12.4 and commercial at 12.7 (P = .03). The mean understandability score was 71%, with academic/hospital sites at 81%, commercial at 73%, and nonprofit at 25%. Only 2 websites-Serenity Surgery and Cleveland Clinic-demonstrated actionability. Overall actionability was 18.5% (95% CI, 7.5%-38.9%), with 24 websites scoring 0% for actionability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current OPEMs concerning breast cryoablation fall short of the American Medical Association's recommendations for health literacy, averaging twice that level. Additionally, there is significant variability in the materials' understandability and actionability.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"564-575"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relative Costs and Outcomes of a Contrast-Enhanced Mammography-Guided Biopsy Trial. 对比增强乳房x线摄影引导活检试验的相对成本和结果。
IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaf019
Jameson Cumsky, Abeer Mousa, Margarita Zuley, Richard Sharpe, Laura K Harper, Molly Harrison, Victor Pizzitola, Marie A Ganott, Bronwyn Nair, Adrienne Vargo, Kimberly Harnist, Uzma Waheed, Amy E Kelly, Bhavika Patel

Objective: To assess the performance and cost implications of contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy (CEM Bx).

Methods: This is a prospective study from May 5, 2021, to April 18, 2022, across 2 U.S. academic centers, evaluating technical success, patient/radiologist feedback, and operational factors of CEM Bx. Inclusion criteria included that patients be 40 years or older and recommended for biopsy with suspicious findings on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). Descriptive statistics are reported for clinical outcomes, length of procedure, and user and participant feedback. An estimate of cost was made by comparing general Medicare costs that are being billed for CEM Bx and post-clip mammogram ($475.48) to the Medicare costs of MRI-guided biopsy (MRI Bx) and post-clip placement mammogram ($845.94).

Results: Eighty-two participants enrolled. Twenty-two were excluded at the time of CEM Bx (22/82, 27%). Sixty participants were included (mean age 57 years, range 33 to 81 years) with 63 suspicious CEM lesions. The malignancy rate was 22% (14/63). A technical success rate of 100% was achieved. Average CEM Bx time was 29% to 33% the average reported MRI-guided breast biopsy times (CEM Bx = 11 minutes; MRI Bx = 33 to 38 minutes), indicating operational efficiencies. A positive opinion of CEM Bx was reported by 78% of radiologists, 93% of technologists, and 98% of patients. The estimated cost for each CEM Bx was ~ 45% lower than MRI Bx.

Conclusion: CEM Bx demonstrates high success rates and satisfaction scores. CEM Bx resulted in shorter procedure times, enhanced operational efficiency, and ~45% reduction in costs compared with MRI Bx. As advancements continue, we anticipate CEM Bx will offer a cost-efficient and timely option for breast biopsy.

目的:评估对比增强乳房x线造影引导活检(CEM Bx)的性能和成本影响。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,从2021年5月5日到2022年4月18日,横跨两个美国学术中心,评估CEM Bx的技术成功、患者/放射科医生反馈和操作因素。纳入标准包括40岁或以上的患者,并建议活检有可疑的对比增强乳房x线摄影(CEM)发现。描述性统计报告的临床结果,过程的长度,用户和参与者的反馈。通过比较常规医疗保险费用(CEM Bx和夹片后乳房x光检查的费用(475.48美元)与MRI引导活检(MRI Bx)和夹片后放置乳房x光检查的医疗保险费用(845.94美元)来估算成本。结果:共纳入82名受试者。22例在CEM Bx时被排除(22/ 82,27 %)。60名参与者(平均年龄57岁,33 - 81岁),63个可疑的CEM病变。恶性肿瘤发生率为22%(14/63)。技术成功率达到100%。平均CEM Bx时间为29%至33%,平均报告mri引导下的乳腺活检时间(CEM Bx = 11分钟;MRI Bx = 33 ~ 38分钟),显示操作效率。78%的放射科医生、93%的技术人员和98%的患者对CEM Bx持积极态度。每次CEM Bx的估计费用比MRI Bx低约45%。结论:CEM Bx具有较高的成功率和满意度。与MRI Bx相比,CEM Bx缩短了手术时间,提高了操作效率,降低了约45%的成本。随着技术的不断进步,我们预计CEM Bx将为乳腺活检提供一种经济、及时的选择。
{"title":"Relative Costs and Outcomes of a Contrast-Enhanced Mammography-Guided Biopsy Trial.","authors":"Jameson Cumsky, Abeer Mousa, Margarita Zuley, Richard Sharpe, Laura K Harper, Molly Harrison, Victor Pizzitola, Marie A Ganott, Bronwyn Nair, Adrienne Vargo, Kimberly Harnist, Uzma Waheed, Amy E Kelly, Bhavika Patel","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf019","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the performance and cost implications of contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy (CEM Bx).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective study from May 5, 2021, to April 18, 2022, across 2 U.S. academic centers, evaluating technical success, patient/radiologist feedback, and operational factors of CEM Bx. Inclusion criteria included that patients be 40 years or older and recommended for biopsy with suspicious findings on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). Descriptive statistics are reported for clinical outcomes, length of procedure, and user and participant feedback. An estimate of cost was made by comparing general Medicare costs that are being billed for CEM Bx and post-clip mammogram ($475.48) to the Medicare costs of MRI-guided biopsy (MRI Bx) and post-clip placement mammogram ($845.94).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two participants enrolled. Twenty-two were excluded at the time of CEM Bx (22/82, 27%). Sixty participants were included (mean age 57 years, range 33 to 81 years) with 63 suspicious CEM lesions. The malignancy rate was 22% (14/63). A technical success rate of 100% was achieved. Average CEM Bx time was 29% to 33% the average reported MRI-guided breast biopsy times (CEM Bx = 11 minutes; MRI Bx = 33 to 38 minutes), indicating operational efficiencies. A positive opinion of CEM Bx was reported by 78% of radiologists, 93% of technologists, and 98% of patients. The estimated cost for each CEM Bx was ~ 45% lower than MRI Bx.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CEM Bx demonstrates high success rates and satisfaction scores. CEM Bx resulted in shorter procedure times, enhanced operational efficiency, and ~45% reduction in costs compared with MRI Bx. As advancements continue, we anticipate CEM Bx will offer a cost-efficient and timely option for breast biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"541-550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144112276","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Differential Imaging Features Based on Menopausal Status and Race. 三阴性乳腺癌:基于绝经状态和种族的不同影像学特征。
IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaf022
Cherie M Kuzmiak, David Sailer, Thad Benefield

Objective: To determine whether menopausal status and race affect the imaging features of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Methods: This institutional review board-approved retrospective study reviewed the clinicopathologic data and imaging features of patients diagnosed with invasive ductal TNBC from January 1, 2014, to March 30, 2023. There were 199 patients, of whom 67 (33.7%) were pre- and perimenopausal and 132 (66.3%) were postmenopausal. Data analysis was performed using Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, and a P-value <.05 was considered significant. Subgroup analysis of Black and White patients was also performed.

Results: Sixty-six percent (44/67) of the TNBCs in the premenopausal group were a round- or oval-shaped mass, while an irregular-shaped mass made up 50.5% (65/129) in the postmenopausal group (P = .041). Three (2.3%) TNBCs were out of the mammographic field of view. Forty-two percent (28/67) of the TNBCs in the premenopausal group had indistinct margins, whereas 51.2% (66/129) of the postmenopausal group had spiculated margins (P = .011). Associated calcifications were present in 29.5% (20/67) of the TNBCs in the premenopausal group vs 24.8% (32/129) (P = .395). In subgroup analysis, a round/oval-shaped TNBC was more common in both premenopausal and postmenopausal Black patients-76.9% (20/26) and 54.5% (24/45), respectively (P = .061). However, 57.1% (44/79) of TNBCs in postmenopausal White women were irregular, and 61.0% (47/79) had spiculated margins (P <.009).

Conclusion: Menopausal status and race should be considered in the imaging features of TNBC. These data may further assist in the understanding of the biology of TNBC and lesion characteristics by race.

目的:探讨绝经状态和种族对三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)影像学特征的影响。方法:本回顾性研究经机构审查委员会批准,回顾了2014年1月1日至2023年3月30日诊断为浸润性导管TNBC患者的临床病理资料和影像学特征。199例患者,其中67例(33.7%)为绝经前及围绝经期,132例(66.3%)为绝经后。使用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行数据分析,P值结果:绝经前组中66%(44/67)的tnbc为圆形或椭圆形肿块,而绝经后组中50.5%(65/129)为不规则形状肿块(P = 0.041)。3例(2.3%)tnbc不在乳房x线摄影视野内。绝经前组中42%(28/67)的tnbc边缘不明显,而绝经后组中51.2%(66/129)的tnbc边缘有针状突起(P = 0.011)。绝经前组tnbc中存在相关钙化的比例为29.5% (20/67)vs 24.8% (32/129) (P = 0.395)。在亚组分析中,圆形/椭圆形TNBC在绝经前和绝经后黑人患者中更为常见,分别为76.9%(20/26)和54.5% (24/45)(P = 0.061)。然而,绝经后白人妇女TNBC的57.1%(44/79)不规则,61.0%(47/79)有毛刺边缘(P结论:TNBC的影像学特征应考虑绝经状态和种族。这些数据可能有助于进一步了解TNBC的生物学和不同种族的病变特征。
{"title":"Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Differential Imaging Features Based on Menopausal Status and Race.","authors":"Cherie M Kuzmiak, David Sailer, Thad Benefield","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf022","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether menopausal status and race affect the imaging features of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This institutional review board-approved retrospective study reviewed the clinicopathologic data and imaging features of patients diagnosed with invasive ductal TNBC from January 1, 2014, to March 30, 2023. There were 199 patients, of whom 67 (33.7%) were pre- and perimenopausal and 132 (66.3%) were postmenopausal. Data analysis was performed using Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test, and a P-value <.05 was considered significant. Subgroup analysis of Black and White patients was also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six percent (44/67) of the TNBCs in the premenopausal group were a round- or oval-shaped mass, while an irregular-shaped mass made up 50.5% (65/129) in the postmenopausal group (P = .041). Three (2.3%) TNBCs were out of the mammographic field of view. Forty-two percent (28/67) of the TNBCs in the premenopausal group had indistinct margins, whereas 51.2% (66/129) of the postmenopausal group had spiculated margins (P = .011). Associated calcifications were present in 29.5% (20/67) of the TNBCs in the premenopausal group vs 24.8% (32/129) (P = .395). In subgroup analysis, a round/oval-shaped TNBC was more common in both premenopausal and postmenopausal Black patients-76.9% (20/26) and 54.5% (24/45), respectively (P = .061). However, 57.1% (44/79) of TNBCs in postmenopausal White women were irregular, and 61.0% (47/79) had spiculated margins (P <.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Menopausal status and race should be considered in the imaging features of TNBC. These data may further assist in the understanding of the biology of TNBC and lesion characteristics by race.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"551-563"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Intelligence for Assessment of Digital Mammography Positioning Reveals Persistent Challenges. 用于评估数字乳房x线摄影定位的人工智能揭示了持续的挑战。
IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaf025
Laurie R Margolies, Georgia G Spear, Jennifer I Payne, Sian E Iles, Mohamed Abdolell

Objective: Mammographic breast cancer detection depends on high-quality positioning, which is traditionally assessed and monitored subjectively. This study used artificial intelligence (AI) to evaluate mammography positioning on digital screening mammograms to identify and quantify unmet mammography positioning quality (MPQ).

Methods: Data were collected within an IRB-approved collaboration. In total, 126 367 digital mammography studies (553 339 images) were processed. Unmet MPQ criteria, including exaggeration, portion cutoff, posterior tissue missing, nipple not in profile, too high on image receptor, inadequate pectoralis length, sagging, and posterior nipple line (PNL) length difference, were evaluated using MPQ AI algorithms. The similarity of unmet MPQ occurrence and rank order was compared for each health system.

Results: Altogether, 163 759 and 219 785 unmet MPQ criteria were identified, respectively, at the health systems. The rank order and the probability distribution of the unmet MPQ criteria were not statistically significantly different between health systems (P = .844 and P = .92, respectively). The 3 most-common unmet MPQ criteria were: short PNL length on the craniocaudal (CC) view, inadequate pectoralis muscle, and excessive exaggeration on the CC view. The percentages of unmet positioning criteria out of the total potential unmet positioning criteria at health system 1 and health system 2 were 8.4% (163 759/1 949 922) and 7.3% (219 785/3 030 129), respectively.

Conclusion: Artificial intelligence identified a similar distribution of unmet MPQ criteria in 2 health systems' daily work. Knowledge of current commonly unmet MPQ criteria can facilitate the improvement of mammography quality through tailored education strategies.

目的:乳房x线摄影检测乳腺癌依赖于高质量的定位,传统上是主观评估和监测。本研究利用人工智能(AI)评估数字筛查乳房x线照片的乳房x线定位,以识别和量化未满足的乳房x线定位质量(MPQ)。方法:数据是在irb批准的合作中收集的。总共处理了126 367份数字乳房x线摄影研究(553 339张图像)。未满足MPQ标准,包括夸张、部分截断、后部组织缺失、乳头不轮廓、图像受体过高、胸肌长度不足、下垂和后乳头线(PNL)长度差异,使用MPQ AI算法进行评估。比较各卫生系统未满足MPQ发生率和等级顺序的相似性。结果:在卫生系统中,共有163 759人和219 785人分别被确定为不符合MPQ标准。未满足MPQ标准的排序顺序和概率分布在不同卫生系统间差异无统计学意义(P =。844和P =。92年,分别)。3个最常见的未满足MPQ标准是:颅侧(CC)视图上PNL长度短,胸肌不足,CC视图上过度夸张。卫生系统1和卫生系统2未达到潜在定位标准的比例分别为8.4%(163 759/1 949 922)和7.3%(219 785/3 030 129)。结论:人工智能在两个卫生系统的日常工作中发现了类似的未满足MPQ标准的分布。了解目前普遍未达到的MPQ标准可以通过量身定制的教育策略促进乳房x光检查质量的提高。
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence for Assessment of Digital Mammography Positioning Reveals Persistent Challenges.","authors":"Laurie R Margolies, Georgia G Spear, Jennifer I Payne, Sian E Iles, Mohamed Abdolell","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf025","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mammographic breast cancer detection depends on high-quality positioning, which is traditionally assessed and monitored subjectively. This study used artificial intelligence (AI) to evaluate mammography positioning on digital screening mammograms to identify and quantify unmet mammography positioning quality (MPQ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected within an IRB-approved collaboration. In total, 126 367 digital mammography studies (553 339 images) were processed. Unmet MPQ criteria, including exaggeration, portion cutoff, posterior tissue missing, nipple not in profile, too high on image receptor, inadequate pectoralis length, sagging, and posterior nipple line (PNL) length difference, were evaluated using MPQ AI algorithms. The similarity of unmet MPQ occurrence and rank order was compared for each health system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 163 759 and 219 785 unmet MPQ criteria were identified, respectively, at the health systems. The rank order and the probability distribution of the unmet MPQ criteria were not statistically significantly different between health systems (P = .844 and P = .92, respectively). The 3 most-common unmet MPQ criteria were: short PNL length on the craniocaudal (CC) view, inadequate pectoralis muscle, and excessive exaggeration on the CC view. The percentages of unmet positioning criteria out of the total potential unmet positioning criteria at health system 1 and health system 2 were 8.4% (163 759/1 949 922) and 7.3% (219 785/3 030 129), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Artificial intelligence identified a similar distribution of unmet MPQ criteria in 2 health systems' daily work. Knowledge of current commonly unmet MPQ criteria can facilitate the improvement of mammography quality through tailored education strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"530-540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144188213","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessing the Outcomes of the Initial Virtual Breast Imaging Fellowship Interview Season. 评估初始虚拟乳房成像奖学金面试季节的结果。
IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaf004
Janine T Katzen, Katie Hunt, Lauren Friedlander, Victoria Mango, Kathryn Watts Zamora

To assess breast imaging fellowship program directors' perspectives of the outcomes of the first-ever virtual interview season. A 19-question survey was constructed by members of the Fellowship Match Committee of the Society of Breast Imaging and distributed via email to 103 program directors. An initial email with a link to the survey was distributed on May 17, 2023, with 2 reminder emails sent on May 31, 2023, and June 20, 2023. The survey was closed on June 26, 2023. Results were compiled, and a descriptive statistical analysis was performed using Excel. There were 36 total responses yielding a response rate of 35% (36/103). The majority of programs, 61% (22/36), did not fill positions with any internal candidates. Overall, 72% answered that the perception of their fellow's performance was equal to or higher than those in prior years. Despite the effects of the pandemic on clinical exposure for this cohort, 73% of programs stated that the fellow's foundational knowledge was equivalent or better. Remarkably, 81% of respondents stated that procedural skills were equivalent or better, and 78% stated that communication skills were equivalent or better. This is the first study to investigate the outcomes of the unexpected pivot to virtual interviews. Despite the lack of preparation for this operational shift, it does not appear to have negatively impacted the program directors' impressions of their matched fellows.

评估乳房成像奖学金项目主任对第一个虚拟面试季结果的看法。一份包含19个问题的调查由乳腺成像学会奖学金匹配委员会的成员组成,并通过电子邮件分发给103名项目主任。我们于2023年5月17日发送了一封带有调查链接的初始邮件,并于2023年5月31日和2023年6月20日发送了两封提醒邮件。该调查于2023年6月26日结束。对结果进行汇总,并使用Excel进行描述性统计分析。共有36例应答,应答率为35%(36/103)。61%(22/36)的项目没有内部候选人填补职位空缺。总体而言,72%的人回答说,他们对同事表现的看法与前几年持平或更高。尽管大流行对该队列的临床暴露有影响,但73%的项目表示,该研究对象的基础知识相当或更好。值得注意的是,81%的受访者表示程序技能相当或更好,78%的受访者表示沟通技能相当或更好。这是第一个调查意外转向虚拟面试的结果的研究。尽管缺乏对这种业务转变的准备,但它似乎并没有对项目主管对他们匹配的同事的印象产生负面影响。
{"title":"Assessing the Outcomes of the Initial Virtual Breast Imaging Fellowship Interview Season.","authors":"Janine T Katzen, Katie Hunt, Lauren Friedlander, Victoria Mango, Kathryn Watts Zamora","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf004","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess breast imaging fellowship program directors' perspectives of the outcomes of the first-ever virtual interview season. A 19-question survey was constructed by members of the Fellowship Match Committee of the Society of Breast Imaging and distributed via email to 103 program directors. An initial email with a link to the survey was distributed on May 17, 2023, with 2 reminder emails sent on May 31, 2023, and June 20, 2023. The survey was closed on June 26, 2023. Results were compiled, and a descriptive statistical analysis was performed using Excel. There were 36 total responses yielding a response rate of 35% (36/103). The majority of programs, 61% (22/36), did not fill positions with any internal candidates. Overall, 72% answered that the perception of their fellow's performance was equal to or higher than those in prior years. Despite the effects of the pandemic on clinical exposure for this cohort, 73% of programs stated that the fellow's foundational knowledge was equivalent or better. Remarkably, 81% of respondents stated that procedural skills were equivalent or better, and 78% stated that communication skills were equivalent or better. This is the first study to investigate the outcomes of the unexpected pivot to virtual interviews. Despite the lack of preparation for this operational shift, it does not appear to have negatively impacted the program directors' impressions of their matched fellows.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"599-605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12826789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143990118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevalence of Axillary Arch Variant Anatomy on Breast MRI and Impact on Axillary Lymph Node Assessment. 腋窝弓变异解剖在乳腺MRI上的流行及对腋窝淋巴结评估的影响。
IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaf023
Anne Elizabeth Kendell, Samantha Yost, Kristie Yang, Megan Mills, Nicole Winkler

Objective: To assess the prevalence of the axillary arch (AA) variant and its impact on the sensitivity of US vs MRI for detecting axillary nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Methods: The IRB waved informed consent for this retrospective study. Three hundred, eighty-two breast MRIs performed for the extent of disease of breast cancer between 2012 and 2023 were reviewed for the presence of AA. Pre-MRI axillary US was available in 322 of these cases. The presence of axillary adenopathy was documented and correlated with pathology. A paired sample comparison was used to calculate sensitivities of US and MRI for detection of the AA.

Results: The AA was detected on breast MRI in 6.8% (26/382) of patients. Of these, 30.8% (8/26) were bilateral, 50% (13/26) were unilateral left, and 19.2% (5/26) were unilateral right. All had lymph nodes both superficial and deep to the AA. Of the 26 patients with AA, 19 patients underwent pre-MRI axillary US. Biopsy-proven malignant adenopathy was detected on MRI but missed on US in 10.5% (2/19) of patients with AA but only 2.5% (7/279) of patients without AA. Sensitivity for detection of lymphadenopathy on MRI and US was 69.7% (82/122)% and 67.5% (77/114) for all patients (P = .17), 72.2% (78/108) and 68.5% (74/108) for patients without AA (P = .21), and 66.2% (4/6) and 50.0% (3/6) for patients with AA. The small sample size of patients with AA precluded statistical comparison.

Conclusion: The AA is a common variant detectable on breast MRI. Axillary nodal metastases may reduce US sensitivity for identifying nodal metastases. Further investigation is required to establish statistical significance.

目的:探讨腋窝弓(axillary arch, AA)变异的患病率及其对乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结转移的US和MRI检测敏感性的影响。方法:IRB对这项回顾性研究表示知情同意。回顾了2012年至2023年期间进行的382例乳腺癌疾病程度的乳房mri,以确定AA的存在。其中322例进行了mri前腋窝超声检查。腋窝腺病的存在被记录并与病理相关。采用配对样本比较计算US和MRI检测AA的灵敏度。结果:乳腺MRI检出AA的比例为6.8%(26/382)。其中,30.8%(8/26)为双侧,50%(13/26)为单侧左侧,19.2%(5/26)为单侧右侧。所有人都有淋巴结,有浅表淋巴结,也有深淋巴结。在26例AA患者中,19例患者行mri前腋窝超声检查。10.5%的AA患者(2/19)在MRI上发现活检证实的恶性腺病,但在US上未发现,而在非AA患者中,这一比例仅为2.5%(7/279)。MRI和US对所有患者淋巴结病变的敏感度分别为69.7%(82/122)%和67.5% (77/114)(P = 0.17),对无AA患者的敏感度分别为72.2%(78/108)和68.5% (74/108)(P = 0.21),对AA患者的敏感度分别为66.2%(4/6)和50.0%(3/6)。AA患者的小样本量妨碍了统计比较。结论:AA是乳腺MRI可检出的常见变异。腋窝淋巴结转移可能会降低美国鉴别淋巴结转移的敏感性。需要进一步调查以确定统计显著性。
{"title":"Prevalence of Axillary Arch Variant Anatomy on Breast MRI and Impact on Axillary Lymph Node Assessment.","authors":"Anne Elizabeth Kendell, Samantha Yost, Kristie Yang, Megan Mills, Nicole Winkler","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf023","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf023","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the prevalence of the axillary arch (AA) variant and its impact on the sensitivity of US vs MRI for detecting axillary nodal metastases in patients with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The IRB waved informed consent for this retrospective study. Three hundred, eighty-two breast MRIs performed for the extent of disease of breast cancer between 2012 and 2023 were reviewed for the presence of AA. Pre-MRI axillary US was available in 322 of these cases. The presence of axillary adenopathy was documented and correlated with pathology. A paired sample comparison was used to calculate sensitivities of US and MRI for detection of the AA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AA was detected on breast MRI in 6.8% (26/382) of patients. Of these, 30.8% (8/26) were bilateral, 50% (13/26) were unilateral left, and 19.2% (5/26) were unilateral right. All had lymph nodes both superficial and deep to the AA. Of the 26 patients with AA, 19 patients underwent pre-MRI axillary US. Biopsy-proven malignant adenopathy was detected on MRI but missed on US in 10.5% (2/19) of patients with AA but only 2.5% (7/279) of patients without AA. Sensitivity for detection of lymphadenopathy on MRI and US was 69.7% (82/122)% and 67.5% (77/114) for all patients (P = .17), 72.2% (78/108) and 68.5% (74/108) for patients without AA (P = .21), and 66.2% (4/6) and 50.0% (3/6) for patients with AA. The small sample size of patients with AA precluded statistical comparison.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AA is a common variant detectable on breast MRI. Axillary nodal metastases may reduce US sensitivity for identifying nodal metastases. Further investigation is required to establish statistical significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"520-529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144112274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Granulomatous Disease Manifesting as Nipple Enlargement. 肉芽肿性疾病,表现为乳头增大。
IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbaf032
Phoebe Hiu Wai Lo, Ting Wong
{"title":"Granulomatous Disease Manifesting as Nipple Enlargement.","authors":"Phoebe Hiu Wai Lo, Ting Wong","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf032","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbaf032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"622-626"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144973260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unknown Case: Implant Protocol Breast MRI-Looking Beyond the Implants. 未知病例:植入协议乳房核磁共振成像--超越植入物。
IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-10-28 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbae067
Molly Hill, Allison Aripoli
{"title":"Unknown Case: Implant Protocol Breast MRI-Looking Beyond the Implants.","authors":"Molly Hill, Allison Aripoli","doi":"10.1093/jbi/wbae067","DOIUrl":"10.1093/jbi/wbae067","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"619-621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142509996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Breast Imaging
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1