Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20556683231200181
Tamsyn Street
Dr. Tamsyn Street is an interdisciplinary researcher working for the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK with a background in motor neurorehabilitation. In the last couple of decades there has been a rapid advancement in assistive technology solutions using electrical stimulation for neurorehabilitation. This editorial examines whether these advancements have translated into good inclusive design performance for clinician and patient end users. Suggestions for overcoming some of the existing challenges are proposed.
{"title":"Inclusive design in electrical stimulation technologies and neurorehabilitation for clinician and patient end users.","authors":"Tamsyn Street","doi":"10.1177/20556683231200181","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683231200181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dr. Tamsyn Street is an interdisciplinary researcher working for the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK with a background in motor neurorehabilitation. In the last couple of decades there has been a rapid advancement in assistive technology solutions using electrical stimulation for neurorehabilitation. This editorial examines whether these advancements have translated into good inclusive design performance for clinician and patient end users. Suggestions for overcoming some of the existing challenges are proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"20556683231200181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c1/96/10.1177_20556683231200181.PMC10475221.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10305781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20556683231166574
C E Proulx, J Higgins, C Vincent, T Vaughan, M Hewko, D H Gagnon
Introduction: Task-specific neurorehabilitation is crucial to optimize hand recovery shortly after a stroke, but intensive neurorehabilitation remains limited in resource-constrained healthcare systems. This has led to a growing interest in the use of robotic gloves as an adjunct intervention to intensify hand-specific neurorehabilitation. This study aims to develop and assess the usability of an operating interface supporting such a technology coupled with a virtual environment through a user-centered design approach.
Methods: Fourteen participants with hand hemiparesis following a stroke were invited to don the robotic glove before browsing through the operating interface and its functionalities, and perform two mobility exercises in a virtual environment. Feedback was collected for improving technology usability. Participants completed the System Usability Scale and ABILHAND questionnaires and their recommendations were gathered and prioritized in a Pugh Matrix.
Results: The System Usability Scale (SUS) score for the operating interface was excellent (M = 87.0 SD = 11.6). A total of 74 recommendations to improve the user interface, calibration process, and exercise usability were identified.
Conclusion: The application of a full cycle of user-centred design approach confirms the high level of usability of the system which is perceived by end users as acceptable and useful for intensifying neurorehabilitation.
{"title":"User-centered development process of an operating interface to couple a robotic glove with a virtual environment to optimize hand rehabilitation following a stroke.","authors":"C E Proulx, J Higgins, C Vincent, T Vaughan, M Hewko, D H Gagnon","doi":"10.1177/20556683231166574","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683231166574","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Task-specific neurorehabilitation is crucial to optimize hand recovery shortly after a stroke, but intensive neurorehabilitation remains limited in resource-constrained healthcare systems. This has led to a growing interest in the use of robotic gloves as an adjunct intervention to intensify hand-specific neurorehabilitation. This study aims to develop and assess the usability of an operating interface supporting such a technology coupled with a virtual environment through a user-centered design approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fourteen participants with hand hemiparesis following a stroke were invited to don the robotic glove before browsing through the operating interface and its functionalities, and perform two mobility exercises in a virtual environment. Feedback was collected for improving technology usability. Participants completed the System Usability Scale and ABILHAND questionnaires and their recommendations were gathered and prioritized in a Pugh Matrix.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The System Usability Scale (SUS) score for the operating interface was excellent (M = 87.0 SD = 11.6). A total of 74 recommendations to improve the user interface, calibration process, and exercise usability were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of a full cycle of user-centred design approach confirms the high level of usability of the system which is perceived by end users as acceptable and useful for intensifying neurorehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"20556683231166574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2f/31/10.1177_20556683231166574.PMC10107379.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9737937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20556683231158552
Laura M Judy, Corey Morrow, Na Jin Seo
Many rehabilitation devices are not adopted by therapists in practice. One major barrier is therapists' limited time and resources to get training. The objective of this study was to develop/evaluate an efficient training program for a novel rehabilitation device. The program was developed based on structured interviews with seven therapists for training preference and composed of asynchronous and in-person trainings following efficient teaching methods. The training program was evaluated for six occupational therapy doctoral students and six licensed therapists in neurorehabilitation practice. Training effectiveness was evaluated in a simulated treatment session in which 3 trainees shifted their roles among therapist applying the device, client, and peer assessor. In results, 11 of the 12 trainees passed the assessment of using the device in simulated treatment sessions. One trainee did not pass because s/he did not plug in the device to charge at the end. The in-person training fit within 1-h lunch break. All trainees perceived that they could effectively use the device in their practice and both asynchronous and in-person training easily fit into their schedule. This project serves as an example for development of an efficient and effective training program for a novel rehabilitation device to facilitate clinical adoption.
{"title":"Development and evaluation of an efficient training program to facilitate the adoption of a novel neurorehabilitation device.","authors":"Laura M Judy, Corey Morrow, Na Jin Seo","doi":"10.1177/20556683231158552","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683231158552","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many rehabilitation devices are not adopted by therapists in practice. One major barrier is therapists' limited time and resources to get training. The objective of this study was to develop/evaluate an efficient training program for a novel rehabilitation device. The program was developed based on structured interviews with seven therapists for training preference and composed of asynchronous and in-person trainings following efficient teaching methods. The training program was evaluated for six occupational therapy doctoral students and six licensed therapists in neurorehabilitation practice. Training effectiveness was evaluated in a simulated treatment session in which 3 trainees shifted their roles among therapist applying the device, client, and peer assessor. In results, 11 of the 12 trainees passed the assessment of using the device in simulated treatment sessions. One trainee did not pass because s/he did not plug in the device to charge at the end. The in-person training fit within 1-h lunch break. All trainees perceived that they could effectively use the device in their practice and both asynchronous and in-person training easily fit into their schedule. This project serves as an example for development of an efficient and effective training program for a novel rehabilitation device to facilitate clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"20556683231158552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ee/bc/10.1177_20556683231158552.PMC9932764.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10826154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20556683231183639
Truls Johansen, Linda Sørensen, Knut K Kolskår, Vegard Strøm, Matthijs F Wouda
Objective: To examine the treatment effect of commercially available robotic-assisted devices, compared to traditional occupational- and physiotherapy on arm and hand function in persons with stroke. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to January 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCT's) involving persons with stroke of all ages and robot-assisted exercise as method for arm and hand function, compared to traditional therapy methods were included. Three authors performed the selection independently. The quality of evidence across studies was assessed using GRADE. Results: Eighteen RCT's were included in the study. A random effects meta-analysis showed a statistically significantly higher treatment effect in the robotic-assisted exercise group (p=<0.0001) compared to the traditional treatment group, with a total effect size of 0.44 (CI = 0.22-0.65). Heterogeneity was high, measured with I2 of 65%). Subgroup analyses showed no significant effects of the type of robotic device, treatment frequency or duration of intervention. Discussion and conclusion: Even though the analysis showed significant improvement in arm and hand function in favor of the robotic-assisted exercise group, the results in this systematic review should be interpreted with caution. This is due to high heterogeneity among the studies included and the presence of possible publication bias. Results of this study highlight the need for larger and more methodological robust RCT's, with a focus on reporting training intensity during robotic exercise.
{"title":"Effectiveness of robot-assisted arm exercise on arm and hand function in stroke survivors - A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Truls Johansen, Linda Sørensen, Knut K Kolskår, Vegard Strøm, Matthijs F Wouda","doi":"10.1177/20556683231183639","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683231183639","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To examine the treatment effect of commercially available robotic-assisted devices, compared to traditional occupational- and physiotherapy on arm and hand function in persons with stroke. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to January 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCT's) involving persons with stroke of all ages and robot-assisted exercise as method for arm and hand function, compared to traditional therapy methods were included. Three authors performed the selection independently. The quality of evidence across studies was assessed using GRADE. <b>Results:</b> Eighteen RCT's were included in the study. A random effects meta-analysis showed a statistically significantly higher treatment effect in the robotic-assisted exercise group (p=<0.0001) compared to the traditional treatment group, with a total effect size of 0.44 (CI = 0.22-0.65). Heterogeneity was high, measured with I<sup>2</sup> of 65%). Subgroup analyses showed no significant effects of the type of robotic device, treatment frequency or duration of intervention. <b>Discussion and conclusion:</b> Even though the analysis showed significant improvement in arm and hand function in favor of the robotic-assisted exercise group, the results in this systematic review should be interpreted with caution. This is due to high heterogeneity among the studies included and the presence of possible publication bias. Results of this study highlight the need for larger and more methodological robust RCT's, with a focus on reporting training intensity during robotic exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"20556683231183639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f0/66/10.1177_20556683231183639.PMC10327418.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10352541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20556683231160675
Sundari Parise, Katharine Lee, Joshua Park, Cari Sullivan, Rebecca Schlesinger, Maggie Li, Samiksha Ramesh, Nicholas Maritato, Teya Bergamaschi, Akaash Sanyal, Nayo Hill, Amy Bastian, Jennifer Keller
Purpose: Trunk stability, an important prerequisite for many activities of daily living, can be impaired in children with movement disorders. Current treatment options can be costly and fail to fully engage young participants. We developed an affordable, smart screen-based intervention and tested if it engages young children in physical therapy goal driven exercises.
Methods: Here we describe the ADAPT system, Aiding Distanced and Accessible Physical Therapy, which is a large touch-interactive device with customizable games. One such game, "Bubble Popper," encourages high repetitions of weight shifts, reaching, and balance training as the participant pops bubbles in sitting, kneeling, or standing positions.
Results: Sixteen participants aged 2-18 years were tested during physical therapy sessions. The number of screen touches and length of game play indicate high participant engagement. In trials lasting less than 3 min, on average, older participants (12-18 years) made 159 screen touches per trial while the younger participants (2-7 years) made 97. In a 30-min session, on average, older participants actively played the game for 12.49 min while younger participants played for 11.22 min.
Conclusion: The ADAPT system is a feasible means to engage young participants in reaching and balance training during physical therapy.
{"title":"Customized gaming system engages young children in reaching and balance training.","authors":"Sundari Parise, Katharine Lee, Joshua Park, Cari Sullivan, Rebecca Schlesinger, Maggie Li, Samiksha Ramesh, Nicholas Maritato, Teya Bergamaschi, Akaash Sanyal, Nayo Hill, Amy Bastian, Jennifer Keller","doi":"10.1177/20556683231160675","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683231160675","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Trunk stability, an important prerequisite for many activities of daily living, can be impaired in children with movement disorders. Current treatment options can be costly and fail to fully engage young participants. We developed an affordable, smart screen-based intervention and tested if it engages young children in physical therapy goal driven exercises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here we describe the ADAPT system, Aiding Distanced and Accessible Physical Therapy, which is a large touch-interactive device with customizable games. One such game, \"Bubble Popper,\" encourages high repetitions of weight shifts, reaching, and balance training as the participant pops bubbles in sitting, kneeling, or standing positions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen participants aged 2-18 years were tested during physical therapy sessions. The number of screen touches and length of game play indicate high participant engagement. In trials lasting less than 3 min, on average, older participants (12-18 years) made 159 screen touches per trial while the younger participants (2-7 years) made 97. In a 30-min session, on average, older participants actively played the game for 12.49 min while younger participants played for 11.22 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ADAPT system is a feasible means to engage young participants in reaching and balance training during physical therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"20556683231160675"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4b/1b/10.1177_20556683231160675.PMC9969433.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10824074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20556683231156788
Hoang H Le, Martin J Loomes, Rui Cv Loureiro
The use of robots in a telerehabilitation paradigm could facilitate the delivery of rehabilitation on demand while reducing transportation time and cost. As a result, it helps to motivate patients to exercise frequently in a more comfortable home environment. However, for such a paradigm to work, it is essential that the robustness of the system is not compromised due to network latency, jitter, and delay of the internet. This paper proposes a solution to data loss compensation to maintain the quality of the interaction between the user and the system. Data collected from a well-defined collaborative task using a virtual reality (VR) environment was used to train a robotic system to adapt to the users' behaviour. The proposed approach uses nonlinear autoregressive models with exogenous input (NARX) and long-short term memory (LSTM) neural networks to smooth out the interaction between the user and the predicted movements generated from the system. LSTM neural networks are shown to learn to act like an actual human. The results from this paper have shown that, with an appropriate training method, the artificial predictor can perform very well by allowing the predictor to complete the task within 25 s versus 23 s when executed by the human.
{"title":"AI enhanced collaborative human-machine interactions for home-based telerehabilitation.","authors":"Hoang H Le, Martin J Loomes, Rui Cv Loureiro","doi":"10.1177/20556683231156788","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683231156788","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of robots in a telerehabilitation paradigm could facilitate the delivery of rehabilitation on demand while reducing transportation time and cost. As a result, it helps to motivate patients to exercise frequently in a more comfortable home environment. However, for such a paradigm to work, it is essential that the robustness of the system is not compromised due to network latency, jitter, and delay of the internet. This paper proposes a solution to data loss compensation to maintain the quality of the interaction between the user and the system. Data collected from a well-defined collaborative task using a virtual reality (VR) environment was used to train a robotic system to adapt to the users' behaviour. The proposed approach uses nonlinear autoregressive models with exogenous input (NARX) and long-short term memory (LSTM) neural networks to smooth out the interaction between the user and the predicted movements generated from the system. LSTM neural networks are shown to learn to act like an actual human. The results from this paper have shown that, with an appropriate training method, the artificial predictor can perform very well by allowing the predictor to complete the task within 25 s versus 23 s when executed by the human.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"20556683231156788"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10031623/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9561630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20556683231172671
Oladele Atoyebi, Maude Beaudoin, François Routhier, Claudine Auger, Louise Demers, Andrew Wister, Michelle Plante, W Ben Mortenson
Background: Preferences of informal caregivers of people with neurocognitive disorders for technological solutions are important in user- centered design approaches. It is crucial to take into consideration the needs and preferences of users when developing new technology to facilitate their uptake.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to determine caregiver preferences for potential technological solutions to help address their needs and compare technology preferences of caregivers who provide care to those with and without neurocognitive disorders (NCD).
Methods: This was a quantitative descriptive study. We surveyed informal caregivers of older adults with disability in Canada. Participants were asked to answer questions about their preferences for 10 potential technological solutions that could be developed to make caregiving easier.
Results: Data from 125 respondents (72 caregivers of people with NCD and 53 caregivers of people with non-NCD-related disabilities) were analyzed. Generally, caregivers preferred web-based solutions as these were among the first five choices for both groups combined. However, there were some differences in the order of preference of potential solutions in both groups.
Conclusion: Informal caregivers of people with NCD preferred web-based solutions to help address their needs.
{"title":"Potential assistive technology preferences of informal caregivers of people with disability.","authors":"Oladele Atoyebi, Maude Beaudoin, François Routhier, Claudine Auger, Louise Demers, Andrew Wister, Michelle Plante, W Ben Mortenson","doi":"10.1177/20556683231172671","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683231172671","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preferences of informal caregivers of people with neurocognitive disorders for technological solutions are important in user- centered design approaches. It is crucial to take into consideration the needs and preferences of users when developing new technology to facilitate their uptake.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine caregiver preferences for potential technological solutions to help address their needs and compare technology preferences of caregivers who provide care to those with and without neurocognitive disorders (NCD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a quantitative descriptive study. We surveyed informal caregivers of older adults with disability in Canada. Participants were asked to answer questions about their preferences for 10 potential technological solutions that could be developed to make caregiving easier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 125 respondents (72 caregivers of people with NCD and 53 caregivers of people with non-NCD-related disabilities) were analyzed. Generally, caregivers preferred web-based solutions as these were among the first five choices for both groups combined. However, there were some differences in the order of preference of potential solutions in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Informal caregivers of people with NCD preferred web-based solutions to help address their needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"20556683231172671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/dd/93/10.1177_20556683231172671.PMC10164850.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10299640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20556683231171840
Shane Forbrigger, Madeleine Liblong, T C Davies, Vincent DePaul, Evelyn Morin, Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad
Introduction: This study investigated the needs of stroke survivors and therapists, and how they may contrast, for the design of robots for at-home post stroke rehabilitation therapy, in the Ontario, Canada, context.
Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with stroke survivors (n = 10) and therapists (n = 6). The transcripts were coded using thematic analysis inspired by the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.
Results: Design recommendations, potential features, and barriers were identified from the interviews. Stroke survivors and therapists agreed on many of the needs for at-home robotic rehabilitation; however, stroke survivors had more insights into their home environment, barriers, and needs relating to technology, while therapists had more insights into therapy methodology and patient safety and interaction. Both groups felt a one-size-fits-all approach to rehabilitation robot design is inappropriate. Designs could address a broader range of impairments by incorporating household items and breaking activities down into their component motions. Designs should incorporate hand and wrist supports and activities. Designs should monitor trunk and shoulder motion and consider incorporating group activities.
Conclusion: While therapists can provide insight in the early stages of design of rehabilitation technology, stroke survivors' perspectives are crucial to designing for the home environment.
{"title":"Considerations for at-home upper-limb rehabilitation technology following stroke: Perspectives of stroke survivors and therapists.","authors":"Shane Forbrigger, Madeleine Liblong, T C Davies, Vincent DePaul, Evelyn Morin, Keyvan Hashtrudi-Zaad","doi":"10.1177/20556683231171840","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683231171840","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigated the needs of stroke survivors and therapists, and how they may contrast, for the design of robots for at-home post stroke rehabilitation therapy, in the Ontario, Canada, context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual interviews were conducted with stroke survivors (<i>n</i> = 10) and therapists (<i>n</i> = 6). The transcripts were coded using thematic analysis inspired by the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Design recommendations, potential features, and barriers were identified from the interviews. Stroke survivors and therapists agreed on many of the needs for at-home robotic rehabilitation; however, stroke survivors had more insights into their home environment, barriers, and needs relating to technology, while therapists had more insights into therapy methodology and patient safety and interaction. Both groups felt a one-size-fits-all approach to rehabilitation robot design is inappropriate. Designs could address a broader range of impairments by incorporating household items and breaking activities down into their component motions. Designs should incorporate hand and wrist supports and activities. Designs should monitor trunk and shoulder motion and consider incorporating group activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While therapists can provide insight in the early stages of design of rehabilitation technology, stroke survivors' perspectives are crucial to designing for the home environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"20556683231171840"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/63/13/10.1177_20556683231171840.PMC10134106.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9747142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20556683231185755
Alexandra Canori, Rithika Lakshminarayanan, Melissa Nunn, Mary Schmidt-Read, Stephen S Intille, Shivayogi V Hiremath
Introduction: Many barriers to physical activity (PA) exist for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Social engagement may improve motivation to perform PA, which in turn may increase PA levels. This pilot study investigates how social engagement facilitated by mobile technology may reduce lack of motivation as a barrier to PA in individuals with SCI and demonstrates design implications for future technologies.
Methods: A user-needs survey was conducted with participants in the community. We recruited 26 participants (16 individuals with SCI and 10 family members or peers). A participatory design process using semi-structured interviews was used to identify themes relating to PA barriers.
Results: One theme related to PA barriers was lack of PA-focused forums to connect with peers. Participants with SCI considered connecting with other individuals with SCI more motivating than connecting with their family members. Another key finding was that participants with SCI did not perceive that personal fitness trackers were targeted towards wheelchair-based activities.
Conclusions: Engagement and communication with peers who have similar functional mobility levels and life experiences can potentially improve motivation for PA; however, PA-motivational platforms are not tailored towards wheelchair-users. Our preliminary findings show that some individuals with SCI are not satisfied with current mobile-technologies for wheelchair-based PA.
{"title":"Potential of social engagement for overcoming barriers to physical activity in individuals with spinal cord injury.","authors":"Alexandra Canori, Rithika Lakshminarayanan, Melissa Nunn, Mary Schmidt-Read, Stephen S Intille, Shivayogi V Hiremath","doi":"10.1177/20556683231185755","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683231185755","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many barriers to physical activity (PA) exist for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Social engagement may improve motivation to perform PA, which in turn may increase PA levels. This pilot study investigates how social engagement facilitated by mobile technology may reduce lack of motivation as a barrier to PA in individuals with SCI and demonstrates design implications for future technologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A user-needs survey was conducted with participants in the community. We recruited 26 participants (16 individuals with SCI and 10 family members or peers). A participatory design process using semi-structured interviews was used to identify themes relating to PA barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One theme related to PA barriers was lack of PA-focused forums to connect with peers. Participants with SCI considered connecting with other individuals with SCI more motivating than connecting with their family members. Another key finding was that participants with SCI did not perceive that personal fitness trackers were targeted towards wheelchair-based activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Engagement and communication with peers who have similar functional mobility levels and life experiences can potentially improve motivation for PA; however, PA-motivational platforms are not tailored towards wheelchair-users. Our preliminary findings show that some individuals with SCI are not satisfied with current mobile-technologies for wheelchair-based PA.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"20556683231185755"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5e/74/10.1177_20556683231185755.PMC10327411.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10352539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20556683231180877
Holly Wilson-Jene, Rachel E Cowan, Jonathan Pearlman
Introduction: Clinical practice guidelines for preservation of upper extremity recommend minimizing wheelchair propulsion forces. Our ability to make quantitative recommendations about the effects of wheelchair configuration changes is limited by system-level tests to measure rolling resistance (RR). We developed a method that directly measures caster and propulsion wheel RR at a component-level. The study purpose is to assess accuracy and consistency of component-level estimates of system-level RR.
Methods: The RR of N = 144 simulated unique wheelchair-user systems were estimated using our novel component-level method and compared to system-level RR measured by treadmill drag tests, representing combinations of caster types/diameters, rear wheel types/diameters, loads, and front-rear load distributions. Accuracy was assessed by Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA) and consistency by intraclass correlation (ICC).
Results: Overall ICC was 0.94, 95% CI [0.91-0.95]. Component-level estimates were systematically lower than system-level (-1.1 N), with LOA +/-1.3 N. RR force differences between methods were constant over the range of test conditions.
Conclusion: Component-level estimates of wheelchair-user system RR are accurate and consistent when compared to a system-level test method, evidenced by small absolute LOA and high ICC. Combined with a prior study on precision, this study helps to establish validity for this RR test method.
简介:保留上肢的临床实践指南建议尽量减少轮椅推进力。我们对轮椅配置变化的影响提出定量建议的能力受到测量滚动阻力(RR)的系统级测试的限制。我们开发了一种在组件级别直接测量脚轮和推进轮RR的方法。研究的目的是评估系统水平RR的成分水平估计的准确性和一致性。方法:使用我们新颖的组件级方法估算N = 144个模拟轮椅使用者系统的RR,并将其与通过跑步机阻力试验测量的系统级RR进行比较,代表脚轮类型/直径、后轮类型/直径、负载和前后负载分布的组合。准确度由Bland-Altman一致性限(LOA)和一致性由类内相关性(ICC)评估。结果:总体ICC为0.94,95% CI[0.91-0.95]。组件水平的估计值系统性地低于系统水平(-1.1 N), LOA +/-1.3 N,在测试条件范围内,方法之间的RR力差异是恒定的。结论:与系统级测试方法相比,轮椅使用者系统RR的组件级估计是准确和一致的,证明了小的绝对LOA和高ICC。结合前人对精度的研究,本研究有助于建立该RR检验方法的效度。
{"title":"A novel approach to directly measuring wheel and caster rolling resistance accurately predicts user-wheelchair system-level rolling resistance.","authors":"Holly Wilson-Jene, Rachel E Cowan, Jonathan Pearlman","doi":"10.1177/20556683231180877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683231180877","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical practice guidelines for preservation of upper extremity recommend minimizing wheelchair propulsion forces. Our ability to make quantitative recommendations about the effects of wheelchair configuration changes is limited by system-level tests to measure rolling resistance (RR). We developed a method that directly measures caster and propulsion wheel RR at a component-level. The study purpose is to assess accuracy and consistency of component-level estimates of system-level RR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RR of <i>N</i> = 144 simulated unique wheelchair-user systems were estimated using our novel component-level method and compared to system-level RR measured by treadmill drag tests, representing combinations of caster types/diameters, rear wheel types/diameters, loads, and front-rear load distributions. Accuracy was assessed by Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA) and consistency by intraclass correlation (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall ICC was 0.94, 95% CI [0.91-0.95]. Component-level estimates were systematically lower than system-level (-1.1 N), with LOA +/-1.3 N. RR force differences between methods were constant over the range of test conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Component-level estimates of wheelchair-user system RR are accurate and consistent when compared to a system-level test method, evidenced by small absolute LOA and high ICC. Combined with a prior study on precision, this study helps to establish validity for this RR test method.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":"10 ","pages":"20556683231180877"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/c9/10.1177_20556683231180877.PMC10251480.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10298918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}