‘America’, bloated with philosophical significance, serves as a meeting grounds for Heidegger and Derrida, flagging theoretical standoffs, identity crashes, a Nietzscean tipoff, and unstoppable poetry wars. Also featuring psychoanalytical stopovers and Rilkean putdowns..
{"title":"The Gestell from Hell: Philosophy Sets Up ‘America’","authors":"Avital Ronell","doi":"10.3366/OLR.2021.0353","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/OLR.2021.0353","url":null,"abstract":"‘America’, bloated with philosophical significance, serves as a meeting grounds for Heidegger and Derrida, flagging theoretical standoffs, identity crashes, a Nietzscean tipoff, and unstoppable poetry wars. Also featuring psychoanalytical stopovers and Rilkean putdowns..","PeriodicalId":43403,"journal":{"name":"OXFORD LITERARY REVIEW","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43838676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The essay reflects on Nietzsche's second Untimely Meditation, ‘On the Use and Disadvantage of the Study of History for Life’, especially as Heidegger reads it in section 76 of Being and Time and as Derrida reads Heidegger's reading of it. Derrida's concludes his first seminar on Heidegger, Heidegger: la question de l’Être et l'Histoire; Cours de l'ENS-Ulm 1964–1965, by reflecting on Heidegger as a Nietzschean antiquarian.
这篇文章反映了尼采的第二次不合时宜的沉思，“关于对生活的历史研究的使用和缺点”，特别是海德格尔在《存在与时间》第76节中读到的，德里达读到海德格尔对它的阅读。德里达的第一次关于海德格尔的研讨会，海德格尔:Être et l' histoire;1964-1965年，通过反思海德格尔作为尼采式的古物学家。
{"title":"Three Timely Untimelies: Heidegger and Derrida on Nietzsche's Second Untimely Meditation","authors":"D. Krell","doi":"10.3366/OLR.2021.0354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/OLR.2021.0354","url":null,"abstract":"The essay reflects on Nietzsche's second Untimely Meditation, ‘On the Use and Disadvantage of the Study of History for Life’, especially as Heidegger reads it in section 76 of Being and Time and as Derrida reads Heidegger's reading of it. Derrida's concludes his first seminar on Heidegger, Heidegger: la question de l’Être et l'Histoire; Cours de l'ENS-Ulm 1964–1965, by reflecting on Heidegger as a Nietzschean antiquarian.","PeriodicalId":43403,"journal":{"name":"OXFORD LITERARY REVIEW","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69623206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This 1986 conversation with Jacques Derrida about Heidegger offers Derrida at his most disarmed and tentative, venturing into areas of Heidegger's thought that he was “the least sure about” around the mid 1980s. Topics discussed include the status of the question, technology, animality, the problem of life, epochality, the ontological difference, as well as a brief but poignant discussion on how to avoid future Holocausts.
{"title":"A Conversation with Jacques Derrida about Heidegger","authors":"","doi":"10.3366/olr.2021.0349","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/olr.2021.0349","url":null,"abstract":"This 1986 conversation with Jacques Derrida about Heidegger offers Derrida at his most disarmed and tentative, venturing into areas of Heidegger's thought that he was “the least sure about” around the mid 1980s. Topics discussed include the status of the question, technology, animality, the problem of life, epochality, the ontological difference, as well as a brief but poignant discussion on how to avoid future Holocausts.","PeriodicalId":43403,"journal":{"name":"OXFORD LITERARY REVIEW","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46071354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A republication of the original discussion that followed Derrida's performance of his conversation about Heidegger at the Essex ‘Reading Heidegger’ conference in 1986.
这是德里达在1986年埃塞克斯“阅读海德格尔”会议上关于海德格尔的谈话的原版讨论的再版。
{"title":"Essex Colloquium Discussion","authors":"","doi":"10.3366/olr.2021.0350","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/olr.2021.0350","url":null,"abstract":"A republication of the original discussion that followed Derrida's performance of his conversation about Heidegger at the Essex ‘Reading Heidegger’ conference in 1986.","PeriodicalId":43403,"journal":{"name":"OXFORD LITERARY REVIEW","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48607929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Derrida's relation to Heidegger can fairly be described as ‘complicated,’ and marked by a deep ambivalence. Although he has always recognized his debt towards Heidegger, Derrida has also insisted on his profound allergy towards some aspects of Heidegger’s thought. The reader is thus often faced with this ambivalence in Derrida's writings, which offer, on the one hand, uncannily precise and insightful readings of Heidegger's texts, with on the other hand less than generous interpretations. We find a Derrida tout contre Heidegger, at once entirely against Heidegger, but also right up close to Heidegger. I will explore this debate between Derrida and Heidegger by focusing on the motifs of deconstruction, presence, the proper and the inappropriable.
{"title":"Tout contre Heidegger","authors":"François Raffoul","doi":"10.3366/OLR.2021.0352","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/OLR.2021.0352","url":null,"abstract":"Derrida's relation to Heidegger can fairly be described as ‘complicated,’ and marked by a deep ambivalence. Although he has always recognized his debt towards Heidegger, Derrida has also insisted on his profound allergy towards some aspects of Heidegger’s thought. The reader is thus often faced with this ambivalence in Derrida's writings, which offer, on the one hand, uncannily precise and insightful readings of Heidegger's texts, with on the other hand less than generous interpretations. We find a Derrida tout contre Heidegger, at once entirely against Heidegger, but also right up close to Heidegger. I will explore this debate between Derrida and Heidegger by focusing on the motifs of deconstruction, presence, the proper and the inappropriable.","PeriodicalId":43403,"journal":{"name":"OXFORD LITERARY REVIEW","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45861957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Taking the question of phenomenality as its guiding thread, this paper attempts to shed light on the relationship between Heidegger's turn and Derrida's 1964/65 seminar on Heidegger. I argue that deconstruction can be understood as a performative attempt to take into account Heidegger's thinking of originary semblance or errancy, which already announces itself in Sein und Zeit and is a central figure of what the later Heidegger calls ‘the turn’. Instead of trying to grasp this errancy or this différance phenomenologically, Derrida takes up the necessity to read and repeat what is already given, what already appears, and thereby undermines, through his reading of Heidegger's Crossing Out of the Word ‘Sein’, the phenomeno-fundamental ontological approach of Sein und Zeit, or rather: shows that it is always already undermined.
本文以现象性问题为主线，试图揭示海德格尔的转向与德里达1964/65海德格尔研讨会之间的关系。我认为，解构主义可以被理解为一种表现性的尝试，它考虑了海德格尔对原始表象或错误的思考，这已经在《Sein und Zeit》中宣告了自己，并且是后来海德格尔称之为“转向”的核心人物。德里达没有试图从现象学上把握这种错误或差异，而是认为有必要阅读和重复已经给出的东西，已经出现的东西，从而通过他对海德格尔的《划掉‘Sein’这个词》的阅读，破坏了《Sein und Zeit》的现象基础本体论方法，或者更确切地说:表明它总是已经被破坏了。
{"title":"Deconstruction as Repetitive Crossing Out and the Movement of Appearing: On Derrida's 1964/65 Heidegger Reading","authors":"Benjamin Schuppert","doi":"10.3366/OLR.2021.0355","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/OLR.2021.0355","url":null,"abstract":"Taking the question of phenomenality as its guiding thread, this paper attempts to shed light on the relationship between Heidegger's turn and Derrida's 1964/65 seminar on Heidegger. I argue that deconstruction can be understood as a performative attempt to take into account Heidegger's thinking of originary semblance or errancy, which already announces itself in Sein und Zeit and is a central figure of what the later Heidegger calls ‘the turn’. Instead of trying to grasp this errancy or this différance phenomenologically, Derrida takes up the necessity to read and repeat what is already given, what already appears, and thereby undermines, through his reading of Heidegger's Crossing Out of the Word ‘Sein’, the phenomeno-fundamental ontological approach of Sein und Zeit, or rather: shows that it is always already undermined.","PeriodicalId":43403,"journal":{"name":"OXFORD LITERARY REVIEW","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46212269","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：