Rodney E Wegner, Stephen Abel, Athanasios Colonias
Aim: Some patients with early stage large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung are not surgical candidates and will be managed with radiotherapy. We used the national cancer database to identify predictors of stereotactic radiotherapy and compare outcomes.
Materials & methods: We queried national cancer database for T1-2N0 LCNEC treated with radiation. Logistic regression and Cox regression identified predictors of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) and survival, respectively.
Results: We identified 754 patients, with 238 (32%) treated with SABR. Predictors of SABR were distance to facility, no chemotherapy, academic center, T1 and recent year. After propensity matching, median survival was 34.7 months compared with 23.7 months in favor of SABR (p = 0.02).
Conclusion: SABR for LCNEC has increased over time and was associated with improved survival.
{"title":"Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for early stage large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung.","authors":"Rodney E Wegner, Stephen Abel, Athanasios Colonias","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2020-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2020-0004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Some patients with early stage large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung are not surgical candidates and will be managed with radiotherapy. We used the national cancer database to identify predictors of stereotactic radiotherapy and compare outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>We queried national cancer database for T1-2N0 LCNEC treated with radiation. Logistic regression and Cox regression identified predictors of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) and survival, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 754 patients, with 238 (32%) treated with SABR. Predictors of SABR were distance to facility, no chemotherapy, academic center, T1 and recent year. After propensity matching, median survival was 34.7 months compared with 23.7 months in favor of SABR (p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SABR for LCNEC has increased over time and was associated with improved survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2020-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2020-0004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38245940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Welcome to Volume 9 of <i>Lung Cancer Management</i>.","authors":"Katherine Gordon","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2020-0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2020-0007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2020-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2020-0007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37808520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aim: We evaluated the efficacy of a novel switch protocol for EGFR-TKIs for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.
Materials & methods: Clinical records were collected from the patients who had received one of two sequential combination strategies of EGFR-TKIs: Salvage use of osimertinib for T790M-mediated acquired resistance to an prior EGFR-TKI or switch use of osimertinib where an EGFR-TKI was switched to osimertinib before disease progression.
Results: Progression-free survival of osimertinib and time from the start of treatment until progression to osimertinib was comparable between the salvage use and switch use of osimertinib.
Conclusion: Switch use of osimertinib seemed to produce improved efficacy for patients with activating EGFR mutations, because of the lack of patient selection via T790M.
{"title":"Switching from first or second generation EGFR-TKI to osimertinib in <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive NSCLC.","authors":"Fumio Imamura, Takako Inoue, Kei Kunimasa, Aki Kubota, Hanako Kuhara, Motohiro Tamiya, Kazumi Nishino, Madoka Kimura, Kika Kuno, Hayato Kawachi, Toru Kumagai","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2020-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2020-0005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We evaluated the efficacy of a novel switch protocol for EGFR-TKIs for <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Clinical records were collected from the patients who had received one of two sequential combination strategies of EGFR-TKIs: Salvage use of osimertinib for <i>T790M</i>-mediated acquired resistance to an prior EGFR-TKI or switch use of osimertinib where an EGFR-TKI was switched to osimertinib before disease progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Progression-free survival of osimertinib and time from the start of treatment until progression to osimertinib was comparable between the salvage use and switch use of osimertinib.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Switch use of osimertinib seemed to produce improved efficacy for patients with activating <i>EGFR</i> mutations, because of the lack of patient selection via <i>T790M</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2020-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2020-0005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37882476","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Aim: To estimate management cost of NSCLC ALK+ patients with and without brain metastasis (BM), and to compare annual costs in patients treated with alectinib or crizotinib.
Methods: Management cost/year (€ 2018) in patients with and without BM was estimated with disaggregated resource consumption provided by local oncologists, including medical visits, hospitalizations, diagnostic/laboratory tests, imaging techniques and surgical procedures. The comparison of costs/year with alectinib and crizotinib, considered the cumulative 12-month incidence of BM in ALEX trial (9.4 and 41.4%, respectively).
Results: Management cost was €6173.42/patient-year without BM and €21,637.50/patient-year with BM. With alectinib, average cost/patient was lower than crizotinib (€4948.51/patient-year).
Conclusion: Prevention of BM with alectinib may result in reductions of cost/year in the management of advanced ALK+ NSCLC.
{"title":"Cost analysis of the management of brain metastases in patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC: alectinib versus crizotinib.","authors":"Dolores Isla, Bartomeu Massuti, Martín Lázaro, Lucía Ruiz de Alda, Rocio Gordo, Nuria Ortega-Joaquín, Itziar Oyagüez","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2019-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2019-0011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To estimate management cost of NSCLC ALK+ patients with and without brain metastasis (BM), and to compare annual costs in patients treated with alectinib or crizotinib.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Management cost/year (€ 2018) in patients with and without BM was estimated with disaggregated resource consumption provided by local oncologists, including medical visits, hospitalizations, diagnostic/laboratory tests, imaging techniques and surgical procedures. The comparison of costs/year with alectinib and crizotinib, considered the cumulative 12-month incidence of BM in ALEX trial (9.4 and 41.4%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Management cost was €6173.42/patient-year without BM and €21,637.50/patient-year with BM. With alectinib, average cost/patient was lower than crizotinib (€4948.51/patient-year).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prevention of BM with alectinib may result in reductions of cost/year in the management of advanced ALK+ NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2020-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2019-0011","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37808521","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michael T Milano, James E Bates, Justin Budnik, Haoming Qiu, Sara Hardy, Michael A Cummings, Megan A Baumgart, Ronald J Maggiore, Deborah A Mulford, Kenneth Y Usuki
Aim: Several consensus guidelines recommend against routine brain imaging at diagnosis of T1-3N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry, patients with pathologically confirmed T1-3N0 NSCLC were identified. Risks of brain metastases at time of initial diagnosis were analyzed.
Results: Patients selected to not undergo primary NSCLC resection had approximately tenfold greater incidence of brain metastases versus those who did. Younger age, adenocarcinoma histology, higher tumor stage and higher histologic grade were all significantly (p < 0.0001) associated with greater likelihood of presenting with brain metastases.
Conclusion: Given the morbidity and mortality of brain metastases, routine brain screening after NSCLC diagnosis (particularly adenocarcinoma) may be justifiable, though more refined cost-benefit analyses are warranted.
{"title":"Risk of brain metastases in T1-3N0 NSCLC: a population-based analysis.","authors":"Michael T Milano, James E Bates, Justin Budnik, Haoming Qiu, Sara Hardy, Michael A Cummings, Megan A Baumgart, Ronald J Maggiore, Deborah A Mulford, Kenneth Y Usuki","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2019-0010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2019-0010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Several consensus guidelines recommend against routine brain imaging at diagnosis of T1-3N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry, patients with pathologically confirmed T1-3N0 NSCLC were identified. Risks of brain metastases at time of initial diagnosis were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients selected to not undergo primary NSCLC resection had approximately tenfold greater incidence of brain metastases versus those who did. Younger age, adenocarcinoma histology, higher tumor stage and higher histologic grade were all significantly (p < 0.0001) associated with greater likelihood of presenting with brain metastases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the morbidity and mortality of brain metastases, routine brain screening after NSCLC diagnosis (particularly adenocarcinoma) may be justifiable, though more refined cost-benefit analyses are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2019-0010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37808519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Alain Gelibter, Mario Occhipinti, Simona Pisegna, Alessio Cortellini, Enrico Cortesi, Paolo Marchetti
Alain Gelibter*,1, Mario Occhipinti1 , Simona Pisegna1, Alessio Cortellini2,3, Enrico Cortesi1 & Paolo Marchetti1,4 1Medical Oncology Unit, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy 2Medical Oncology Unit, St. Salvatore Hospital, L’Aquila, Italy 3Department of Biotechnological & Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy 4U.O.C. Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Sant’Andrea, Rome, Italy *Author for correspondence: alain.gelibter@uniroma1.it
{"title":"Status of correlation between BMI and response to immunocheck-point inhibitor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.","authors":"Alain Gelibter, Mario Occhipinti, Simona Pisegna, Alessio Cortellini, Enrico Cortesi, Paolo Marchetti","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2019-0016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2019-0016","url":null,"abstract":"Alain Gelibter*,1, Mario Occhipinti1 , Simona Pisegna1, Alessio Cortellini2,3, Enrico Cortesi1 & Paolo Marchetti1,4 1Medical Oncology Unit, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy 2Medical Oncology Unit, St. Salvatore Hospital, L’Aquila, Italy 3Department of Biotechnological & Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy 4U.O.C. Oncologia Medica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Sant’Andrea, Rome, Italy *Author for correspondence: alain.gelibter@uniroma1.it","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2019-0016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37882475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anna L McGuire, Curtis B Hughesman, Melissa K McConechy, Barb Melosky, Stephen Lam, Renelle Myers, John Yee, Ernest Tang, Stephen Yip
Anna L McGuire*,1, Curtis B Hughesman2, Melissa K McConechy3, Barb Melosky4,5, Stephen Lam4,6, Renelle Myers4,6, John Yee1, Ernest Tang1 & Stephen Yip2,7 1Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V5Z1M9, BC, Canada 2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer, Cancer Genetics & Genomics Laboratory, Vancouver, BC, Canada 3Contextual Genomics Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada 4Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 5Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 6Department of Medicine, Divisions of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 7Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada *Author for correspondence: anna.mcguire@vch.ca
{"title":"Optimizing molecular residual disease detection using liquid biopsy postoperatively in early stage lung cancer.","authors":"Anna L McGuire, Curtis B Hughesman, Melissa K McConechy, Barb Melosky, Stephen Lam, Renelle Myers, John Yee, Ernest Tang, Stephen Yip","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2019-0017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2019-0017","url":null,"abstract":"Anna L McGuire*,1, Curtis B Hughesman2, Melissa K McConechy3, Barb Melosky4,5, Stephen Lam4,6, Renelle Myers4,6, John Yee1, Ernest Tang1 & Stephen Yip2,7 1Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V5Z1M9, BC, Canada 2Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, BC Cancer, Cancer Genetics & Genomics Laboratory, Vancouver, BC, Canada 3Contextual Genomics Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada 4Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 5Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 6Department of Medicine, Divisions of Respiratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada 7Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada *Author for correspondence: anna.mcguire@vch.ca","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2019-0017","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37882474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Luigi Della Gravara, Ciro Battiloro, Rosa Cantile, Antonietta Letizia, Fabiana Vitiello, Vincenzo Montesarchio, Danilo Rocco
Luigi Della Gravara1, Ciro Battiloro2, Rosa Cantile2, Antonietta Letizia2, Fabiana Vitiello2, Vincenzo Montesarchio3 & Danilo Rocco*,2 1Department of Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Caserta, Italy 2Division of Pulmonary Oncology, AORN dei Colli Monaldi, Naples, Italy 3Division of Medical Oncology, AORN dei Colli Monaldi, Naples, Italy *Author for correspondence: danilorocc@yahoo.it
{"title":"Chemotherapy and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC first-line setting: what is the best approach?","authors":"Luigi Della Gravara, Ciro Battiloro, Rosa Cantile, Antonietta Letizia, Fabiana Vitiello, Vincenzo Montesarchio, Danilo Rocco","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2019-0018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2019-0018","url":null,"abstract":"Luigi Della Gravara1, Ciro Battiloro2, Rosa Cantile2, Antonietta Letizia2, Fabiana Vitiello2, Vincenzo Montesarchio3 & Danilo Rocco*,2 1Department of Experimental Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Caserta, Italy 2Division of Pulmonary Oncology, AORN dei Colli Monaldi, Naples, Italy 3Division of Medical Oncology, AORN dei Colli Monaldi, Naples, Italy *Author for correspondence: danilorocc@yahoo.it","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2019-0018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37808517","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
NSCLC accounts for 80% of all lung cancer diagnoses, and approximately a third of patients present with locally advanced (stage III) disease [1]. The optimal therapy for fit patients with unresectable and/or inoperable stage III disease has evolved over the last three decades from radiation alone to sequential chemoradiation (CRT) to concurrent CRT followed by checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CPI). The recently reported PACIFIC trial generated a paradigm shift in the treatment of such patients, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 57% for patients receiving consolidation durvalumab compared with 43.5% for those receiving placebo [2–4]. Similar outcomes were reported with consolidation pembrolizumab in a Hoosier Cancer Research Network (HCRN) Phase II Trial [5]. In this article, we explore key clinical challenges that arise when treating patients with consolidation CPI after CRT for patients with stage III NSCLC; namely, the management of CPI-related pneumonitis, timing of consolidation CPI and their role in patients with PD-L1 TPS <1% and distinguishing local progression versus pseudoprogression.
{"title":"Practical challenges in patients with stage III NSCLC receiving checkpoint inhibitors after chemoradiation.","authors":"Nikhil A Shukla, Nasser H Hanna","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2020-0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2020-0001","url":null,"abstract":"NSCLC accounts for 80% of all lung cancer diagnoses, and approximately a third of patients present with locally advanced (stage III) disease [1]. The optimal therapy for fit patients with unresectable and/or inoperable stage III disease has evolved over the last three decades from radiation alone to sequential chemoradiation (CRT) to concurrent CRT followed by checkpoint inhibitor therapy (CPI). The recently reported PACIFIC trial generated a paradigm shift in the treatment of such patients, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 57% for patients receiving consolidation durvalumab compared with 43.5% for those receiving placebo [2–4]. Similar outcomes were reported with consolidation pembrolizumab in a Hoosier Cancer Research Network (HCRN) Phase II Trial [5]. In this article, we explore key clinical challenges that arise when treating patients with consolidation CPI after CRT for patients with stage III NSCLC; namely, the management of CPI-related pneumonitis, timing of consolidation CPI and their role in patients with PD-L1 TPS <1% and distinguishing local progression versus pseudoprogression.","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2020-0001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37808518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Konstantinos Sapalidis, Konstantinos Romanidis, Panagoula Oikonomou, Paul Zarogoulidis, Athanasios Katsaounis, Aikaterini Amaniti, Nikolaos Michalopoulos, Charilaos Koulouris, Kosmas Tsakiridis, Dimitrios Giannakidis, Isaak Kesisoglou, Aris Ioannidis, Iason Nikolaos-Katsios, Anastasios Vagionas, Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt, Haidong Huang, Chong Bai, Alexandru Marian Goganau, Christoforos Kosmidis
Lung cancer is still diagnosed at a late stage due to lack of early disease symptoms. Despite the development of new diagnostic endoscopic tools, such as radial/convex endobronchial ultrasounds (EBUS) and electromagnetic navigation, most patients are still diagnosed at advanced stage disease. Most of the patients refer to their doctor only if they cough blood or their cough changes character. There are challenging cases in the diagnosis and staging of a patient, such as the one that we will present. We present a case of lung cancer that was diagnosed through a biopsy from the main lesion, with access from the esophagus, through transbronchial needle aspiration with EBUS, under general anesthesia and intubation. Staging with transbronchial needle aspiration with EBUS was also performed at the same session.
{"title":"Convex endobronchial ultrasound: same coin, two faces. Challenging biopsy and staging for non-small-cell lung cancer.","authors":"Konstantinos Sapalidis, Konstantinos Romanidis, Panagoula Oikonomou, Paul Zarogoulidis, Athanasios Katsaounis, Aikaterini Amaniti, Nikolaos Michalopoulos, Charilaos Koulouris, Kosmas Tsakiridis, Dimitrios Giannakidis, Isaak Kesisoglou, Aris Ioannidis, Iason Nikolaos-Katsios, Anastasios Vagionas, Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt, Haidong Huang, Chong Bai, Alexandru Marian Goganau, Christoforos Kosmidis","doi":"10.2217/lmt-2019-0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2217/lmt-2019-0008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung cancer is still diagnosed at a late stage due to lack of early disease symptoms. Despite the development of new diagnostic endoscopic tools, such as radial/convex endobronchial ultrasounds (EBUS) and electromagnetic navigation, most patients are still diagnosed at advanced stage disease. Most of the patients refer to their doctor only if they cough blood or their cough changes character. There are challenging cases in the diagnosis and staging of a patient, such as the one that we will present. We present a case of lung cancer that was diagnosed through a biopsy from the main lesion, with access from the esophagus, through transbronchial needle aspiration with EBUS, under general anesthesia and intubation. Staging with transbronchial needle aspiration with EBUS was also performed at the same session.</p>","PeriodicalId":43551,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2020-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/lmt-2019-0008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37581115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}