Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/18626033.2023.2258727
Wim Wambecq
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Additional informationNotes on contributorsWim WambecqWim Wambecq is an engineer-architect and urbanist. He worked as an independent architect for Studio Associato Bernardo Secchi–Paola Viganò after which he joined the Research Groupa of Urbanism and Architecture (RUA-OSA, KU Leuven), where he elaborated his PhD research on Forest Urbanism in Flanders (2019). For this research he was awarded the third Manuel De Solà-Morales European Award in 2021. He currently teaches Urban Design and Architecture at the Department of Architecture at KU Leuven, with a focus on the systemic functioning of landscapes and their public infrastructure. He is also the co-founder of the interdisciplinary design office MIDI, based in Lisbon and Brussels.
点击放大图片大小点击缩小图片大小附加信息关于贡献者的说明swim Wambecq wim Wambecq是一名工程师、建筑师和城市规划师。他曾作为独立建筑师在Studio Associato Bernardo Secchi-Paola Viganò工作,之后他加入了城市主义和建筑研究小组(RUA-OSA, KU Leuven),在那里他阐述了他在佛兰德斯的森林城市主义的博士研究(2019)。由于这项研究,他于2021年获得了第三届曼努埃尔·德Solà-Morales欧洲奖。他目前在鲁汶大学建筑系教授城市设计和建筑,重点是景观及其公共基础设施的系统功能。他也是跨学科设计事务所MIDI的联合创始人,该事务所位于里斯本和布鲁塞尔。
{"title":"Forest Urbanism Frame: A common ‘ground’ between forest and urbanism","authors":"Wim Wambecq","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2023.2258727","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2258727","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Additional informationNotes on contributorsWim WambecqWim Wambecq is an engineer-architect and urbanist. He worked as an independent architect for Studio Associato Bernardo Secchi–Paola Viganò after which he joined the Research Groupa of Urbanism and Architecture (RUA-OSA, KU Leuven), where he elaborated his PhD research on Forest Urbanism in Flanders (2019). For this research he was awarded the third Manuel De Solà-Morales European Award in 2021. He currently teaches Urban Design and Architecture at the Department of Architecture at KU Leuven, with a focus on the systemic functioning of landscapes and their public infrastructure. He is also the co-founder of the interdisciplinary design office MIDI, based in Lisbon and Brussels.","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/18626033.2023.2258725
Vu Thi Phuong Linh
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Additional informationNotes on contributorsVu Thi Phuong LinhVu Thi Phuong Linh is currently doing a PhD at KU Leuven. Her research concerns water urbanism and indigenous practices in the Mekong Delta, Viet Nam, and Cambodia. She has taught and managed the Architecture Department at Yersin University (Dalat, Vietnam). She used to work as a consultant for the European Union, UNDP and the World Bank in Vietnam's urban resilience and sustainable development.
点击放大图片点击缩小图片附加信息关于贡献者的说明vu Thi Phuong Linh vu Thi Phuong Linh目前在比利时鲁汶大学攻读博士学位。她的研究涉及湄公河三角洲、越南和柬埔寨的水城市化和土著实践。她曾任教于越南耶尔新大学(Dalat, Vietnam)建筑系。她曾担任欧盟、联合国开发计划署和世界银行在越南城市韧性和可持续发展方面的顾问。
{"title":"Inhabited flooded forests of the Tonle Sap Lake","authors":"Vu Thi Phuong Linh","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2023.2258725","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2258725","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Additional informationNotes on contributorsVu Thi Phuong LinhVu Thi Phuong Linh is currently doing a PhD at KU Leuven. Her research concerns water urbanism and indigenous practices in the Mekong Delta, Viet Nam, and Cambodia. She has taught and managed the Architecture Department at Yersin University (Dalat, Vietnam). She used to work as a consultant for the European Union, UNDP and the World Bank in Vietnam's urban resilience and sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/18626033.2023.2258731
Jörg Rekittke
"Urban Forests, Forest Urbanisms & Global Warming." Journal of Landscape Architecture, 18(1), pp. 109–110 Notes1 The conference is documented online, with all topics, all speakers and all abstracts, at the following link: architectuur.kuleuven.be/urban-forests-foresturbanisms-globalwarming.2 In addition to the conference recommendation, a travel recommendation: go, by public transport, to where 85 per cent of Singaporeans live, in the housing blocks (HDB) that are being built by the government. People there are not biophilic, because there isn’t much of the flagship greenery that the tourist office markets to be found.3 One can take a look at the imagery dreamed of in Indonesian government circles: Dennis Normile, ‘Indonesia’s Utopian New Capital May Not Be as Green as It Looks: Moving the Government to Borneo Could Speed Deforestation’, Science 375/6580 (2022), science.org/content/article/indonesia-s-utopiannew-capital-may-notbe-green-it-looks.
{"title":"Urban Forests, Forest Urbanisms & Global WarmingUrban Forests, Forest Urbanisms & Global Warming, Department of Architecture, KU Leuven, Belgium, 27 | 28 | 29 June 2022","authors":"Jörg Rekittke","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2023.2258731","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2258731","url":null,"abstract":"\"Urban Forests, Forest Urbanisms & Global Warming.\" Journal of Landscape Architecture, 18(1), pp. 109–110 Notes1 The conference is documented online, with all topics, all speakers and all abstracts, at the following link: architectuur.kuleuven.be/urban-forests-foresturbanisms-globalwarming.2 In addition to the conference recommendation, a travel recommendation: go, by public transport, to where 85 per cent of Singaporeans live, in the housing blocks (HDB) that are being built by the government. People there are not biophilic, because there isn’t much of the flagship greenery that the tourist office markets to be found.3 One can take a look at the imagery dreamed of in Indonesian government circles: Dennis Normile, ‘Indonesia’s Utopian New Capital May Not Be as Green as It Looks: Moving the Government to Borneo Could Speed Deforestation’, Science 375/6580 (2022), science.org/content/article/indonesia-s-utopiannew-capital-may-notbe-green-it-looks.","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"218 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/18626033.2023.2258720
Kelly Shannon, Chiara Cavalieri, Cecil Konijnendijk
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Bruno De Meulder and the JoLA editors for their rounds of editing and insights of the article.Notes1 See: Christophe Girot, who proclaims that the two main archetypes of designed landscapes are the forest clearing and the walled garden. Christophe Girot, The Course of Landscape Architecture: A History of Our Designs on the Natural World, from Prehistory to the Present (New York: Thames and Hudson, 2016).2 See for the recent controversy concerning forest land disputes in Costa Rica: Fred Pearce, ‘Lauded as Green Model, Costa Rica Faces Unrest in Its Forests’, Yale Environment 360 (March 2023), e360.yale.edu/features/costa-rica-deforestation-indigenous-lands, accessed March 2023.3 Hannah Ritchi and Max Roser, ‘Forests and Deforestation’, Our World in Data (2021), ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation, accessed January 2023.4 Edward O. Wilson, Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life (New York: Liveright, 2016).5 Cecil Konijnendijk, ‘A Short History of Urban Forestry in Europe’, Journal of Arboriculture 23/1 (1997), 31–19; Cecil Konijnendijk et al. (eds.), Urban Forests and Trees (Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2005).6 Erik Jorgensen, ‘Towards an Urban Forestry Concept’, in: Proceedings of the 10th Commonwealth Forestry Conference (Craven Arms, Shropshire, UK: Commonwealth Forestry Association, 1974).7 See, for example: Theodore A. Endreny, ‘Strategically Growing the Urban Forest Will Improve Our World’, Nature Communications 9 (2018), article number 1160, doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03622-0; Tamara Iungman et al., ‘Cooling Cities through Urban Green Infrastructure: A Health Impact Assessment of European Cities’, The Lancet 401/10376 (2023), 577–589, thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02585-5/fulltext, accessed March 2023.8 See, for example: Richard E. Leakey and Roger Lewin, The Sixth Extinction: Patterns of Life and the Future of Human-kind (New York: Doubleday, 1995); Elizabeth Kolbert, The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History (London: Picador, 2015).9 See: Matilda van den Bosch, ‘Impacts of Urban Forests on Physical and Mental Health and Wellbeing’, in: Francesco Ferrini, Cecil C. Konijnendijk van den Bosch and Alessio Fini (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Urban Forestry (Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2017), 82–95; Michelle C. Kondo et al., ‘Health Impact Assessment of Philadelphia’s 2025 Tree Canopy Cover Goals’, The Lancet: Planetary Health (April 2020), thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(20)30058-9/fulltext, accessed February 2023; and Iungman et al., ‘Cooling Cities through Urban Green Infrastructure’, op. cit. (note 7).10 See, for example: Hillary Angelo, ‘Added Value? Denaturalizing the “Good” of Urban Greening’, Geography Compass 13/8 (2019): e12459, doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12459, accessed February 2023; and Hamil Pearsall and Isabelle Anguelovski, ‘Contesting and Resisting Environmental Ge
http://www.science/article/pii/s2666378321000040,于2023年1月访问;和全国城市交通官员协会(NACTO)的出版物,nacto.org/publication,于2023.18年1月访问。罗塞塔·s·埃尔金,植物生命:造林的纠缠政治(明尼阿波利斯:明尼苏达大学出版社,2022)参见:青安娜:《世界尽头的蘑菇》(纽约:普林斯顿大学出版社,2015);唐娜·哈拉威,《与麻烦为伍:在Chthulucene制造亲属》(达勒姆,北卡罗来纳州:杜克大学出版社,2016),第20页Stefano Mancuso,《植物的革命天才:对植物智能和行为的新理解》(纽约:Atria Books, 2017)Suzanne Simard,寻找母亲树:在森林中发现智慧(纽约:Knopf出版社,2021).22参见:Weizmann树木实验室:运动中的树木生态生理学,Weizmann .ac。24 . Sonja ddpelmann,《看树:纽约市和柏林街道树木的历史》(纽黑文:耶鲁大学出版社,2019年)Sonja ddpelmann,“植物”,见:Sonja ddpelmann, The Landscape Project (San Francisco: AR + D Publishing, 2022), 55.25见:Paulo Tavares,“in The Forest Ruins”,e-flux Architecture (2016), e-flux.com/architecture/superhumanity/68688/in-the-forest-ruins/, 2023年2月访问;Paulo Tavares,“树木,藤蔓,棕榈树和其他建筑纪念碑”,哈佛设计杂志:进入森林45 (2018),189-195,paulotavares。net/info, 2023年2月访问;查尔斯·m·彼得斯,《管理荒野:人、植物和热带森林的故事》(纽黑文:耶鲁大学出版社,2018年)28 .詹姆斯·c·斯科特,《像一个国家一样看》(纽黑文:耶鲁大学出版社,1998年),11.27西尔万·皮龙,《世界的占领》(布鲁塞尔:Zones Sensibles, 2018年)Bruno De Meulder和Kelly Shannon,“城市中的森林和树木:西南佛兰德斯和湄公河三角洲”,见:Daniel Czechowski, Thomas Hauck和Georg Hausladen(编),修订绿色基础设施:自然与设计之间的概念(伦敦:CRC出版社,2014),427-449.29查尔斯·瓦尔德海姆(编),案例:底特律拉斐特公园(纽约:Prestel, 2004)见:德·默德和香农,《城市中的森林和树木》,同上(注28);Wim Wambecq和Bruno De Meulder,“洪水+森林:重新连接布鲁塞尔景观的迁移走廊”,Scenario Journal 6 (2017), Scenario Journal。http://www.article/floodforest/, 2023年2月访问;Bruno De Meulder, Kelly Shannon和Minh Quang Nguyen,“森林城市主义:比利时森林的城市和生态战略和工具”,《景观建筑前沿》7/1 (2019)18-33;Wim Wambecq,分散佛兰德地区的森林城市主义(KU Leuven博士论文,2019);Vu Thi Phuong Linh, Kelly Shannon和Bruno De Meulder,“柬埔寨洞里萨湖Boeng Chhmar淹水森林中有争议的生活”,Land 11/11 (2022), 2080, doi.org/10.3390/land11112080, 2023年2月访问。凯利·香农(kelly Shannon)在鲁汶大学教授城市主义,是人类住区硕士和城市主义、景观和规划硕士的项目主任。她的研究是批判性分析、投影地图学和设计的交叉。她的工作主要集中在全球变暖时期景观城市化的发展,以及与水、植被和地形有关的策略的发展。她发表了大量文章,并从事设计研究咨询项目,主要为越南和佛兰德政府服务。Chiara Cavalieri,建筑师和城市规划博士(威尼斯大学IUAV),鲁汶天主教大学(UCLouvain)城市规划副教授。多年来,她协调和指导了几项研究活动和区域愿景,如“蓝色空间”,欧洲大都市里尔-科尔特里克-图尔奈(StudioPaolaViganò,实验室- u,洛桑EPFL),“水平大都市”(洛桑EPFL),“水的语言”(UCLouvain与Latitude), LABOXXI (Atlas, L ' urbanisation du 20e sioulcle dans et autour de Bruxelles)。她目前正在开展跨界城市地区的水和景观城市化研究,特别侧重于绘制和表示所涉及的领土动态。Cecil Konijnendijk是一位城市林业学者,目前是基于自然的解决方案研究所(一个以证据为基础的城市绿化智库)的共同负责人。他还是英属哥伦比亚大学的名誉教授和瓦赫宁根大学的访问学者。塞西尔出版了大量书籍,并就城市林业方案和计划的制定和执行向30多个国家的国际组织和地方当局提供咨询意见。
{"title":"Urban forests, forest urbanisms and global warming: Developing greener, cooler and more resilient and adaptable cities","authors":"Kelly Shannon, Chiara Cavalieri, Cecil Konijnendijk","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2023.2258720","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2258720","url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Bruno De Meulder and the JoLA editors for their rounds of editing and insights of the article.Notes1 See: Christophe Girot, who proclaims that the two main archetypes of designed landscapes are the forest clearing and the walled garden. Christophe Girot, The Course of Landscape Architecture: A History of Our Designs on the Natural World, from Prehistory to the Present (New York: Thames and Hudson, 2016).2 See for the recent controversy concerning forest land disputes in Costa Rica: Fred Pearce, ‘Lauded as Green Model, Costa Rica Faces Unrest in Its Forests’, Yale Environment 360 (March 2023), e360.yale.edu/features/costa-rica-deforestation-indigenous-lands, accessed March 2023.3 Hannah Ritchi and Max Roser, ‘Forests and Deforestation’, Our World in Data (2021), ourworldindata.org/forests-and-deforestation, accessed January 2023.4 Edward O. Wilson, Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life (New York: Liveright, 2016).5 Cecil Konijnendijk, ‘A Short History of Urban Forestry in Europe’, Journal of Arboriculture 23/1 (1997), 31–19; Cecil Konijnendijk et al. (eds.), Urban Forests and Trees (Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2005).6 Erik Jorgensen, ‘Towards an Urban Forestry Concept’, in: Proceedings of the 10th Commonwealth Forestry Conference (Craven Arms, Shropshire, UK: Commonwealth Forestry Association, 1974).7 See, for example: Theodore A. Endreny, ‘Strategically Growing the Urban Forest Will Improve Our World’, Nature Communications 9 (2018), article number 1160, doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03622-0; Tamara Iungman et al., ‘Cooling Cities through Urban Green Infrastructure: A Health Impact Assessment of European Cities’, The Lancet 401/10376 (2023), 577–589, thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02585-5/fulltext, accessed March 2023.8 See, for example: Richard E. Leakey and Roger Lewin, The Sixth Extinction: Patterns of Life and the Future of Human-kind (New York: Doubleday, 1995); Elizabeth Kolbert, The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History (London: Picador, 2015).9 See: Matilda van den Bosch, ‘Impacts of Urban Forests on Physical and Mental Health and Wellbeing’, in: Francesco Ferrini, Cecil C. Konijnendijk van den Bosch and Alessio Fini (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Urban Forestry (Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2017), 82–95; Michelle C. Kondo et al., ‘Health Impact Assessment of Philadelphia’s 2025 Tree Canopy Cover Goals’, The Lancet: Planetary Health (April 2020), thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(20)30058-9/fulltext, accessed February 2023; and Iungman et al., ‘Cooling Cities through Urban Green Infrastructure’, op. cit. (note 7).10 See, for example: Hillary Angelo, ‘Added Value? Denaturalizing the “Good” of Urban Greening’, Geography Compass 13/8 (2019): e12459, doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12459, accessed February 2023; and Hamil Pearsall and Isabelle Anguelovski, ‘Contesting and Resisting Environmental Ge","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/18626033.2023.2258726
Jorg Sieweke
AbstractThe term ‘urban forest’ is an oxymoron and continues to provoke a staggering set of questions. The default practice of transplanting cloned saplings from nurseries into the city holds little promise of adding up to more than the sum of its destressed trees. In contrast, there is growing recognition of the unsanctioned emergent forest vegetation of urban fallows. While the fields of cultural geography and urban ecology recognize such unintentional urban forests for their layered sociocultural, ecological and health benefits, city administrators, the general public and even landscape architects have been slower to embrace them. However, consequences of global warming and the subsequent rise of urban ecology mandates an update regarding current challenges and potentials in managing urban forests. Park projects can expand the normative canon by embracing recent urban ecology concepts concerning spontaneous vegetation on fallow urban land, such as ‘ruderal’ and ‘fourth nature’. This paper critically reviews traditional notions of urban forestry and refutes the single tree planting approach. It questions standardized connotations and nativist biases towards invasive species and argues that spontaneous vegetation is well equipped to provide and expand critical networks to more resilient and enduring urban forest patches. It explores cases in Germany, in general, and Berlin, in particular, to ground the relevance for emergent vegetation. It considers the acknowledgment and utilization of recent developments in forestry science regarding microbial ecology, including the mycorrhizal and symbiotic macro/micro networks, important for landscape architecture and necessary to propose more resilient and healthy forested urban environments.Keywords: urban ecologymyceliumwood-wide-webmicrobiomeholobiont AcknowledgmentsI would like to thank professor Kelly Shannon for her invaluable contribution in the editing process. My special thanks go to Dr Jake M. Robinson, microbial ecologist, for his work as consultant and studio co-advisor, and my research assistants Flora Kießling and Florian Opitz at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. The work was funded through the Norwegian Research Council, project “spaces for resilience”.Notes1 Sonja Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees: A History of Street Trees in New York City and Berlin (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019), 21–42.2 Berlin’s rapid increase in housing along with the growth of industrialization was structured by British engineer James Hobrecht, who introduced the layout of the sewer network as the armature for urban form.3 Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees, op. cit. (note 1), 2.4 Joanna Dean, ‘Seeing Trees, Thinking Forests: Urban Forestry at the University of Toronto in the 1960s’, in: Alan Mac-Eachern and William J. Turkel (eds.), Method and Meaning in Canadian Environmental History (Toronto: Nelson, 2009).5 Dieter Hennebo, Garden and landscape historian, 1970, in: Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees, op. cit. (note 1).6 Lara
摘要“城市森林”一词是一个矛盾修饰法,并继续引发一系列令人震惊的问题。从苗圃将克隆树苗移植到城市的默认做法,几乎没有希望增加超过其受损树木的总和。相比之下,越来越多的人认识到城市休耕区未经批准的新兴森林植被。虽然文化地理学和城市生态学领域认识到这种无意的城市森林具有多层次的社会文化、生态和健康效益,但城市管理者、普通公众甚至景观设计师都不太愿意接受它们。然而,全球变暖的后果和随后城市生态的兴起要求对管理城市森林的当前挑战和潜力进行更新。公园项目可以通过采纳最近关于城市休耕土地上自然植被的城市生态学概念,如“原始”和“第四自然”,来扩展规范标准。本文批判性地回顾了传统的城市林业观念,驳斥了单一植树的做法。它质疑标准化的内涵和本土主义者对入侵物种的偏见,并认为自然植被有能力提供和扩展关键的网络,使其成为更具弹性和持久性的城市森林斑块。它探索了德国的案例,一般来说,尤其是柏林,以接地与新兴植被的相关性。它认为承认和利用林业科学在微生物生态学方面的最新发展,包括菌根和共生宏观/微观网络,这对景观设计很重要,对于提出更具弹性和健康的森林城市环境是必要的。我要感谢Kelly Shannon教授在编辑过程中所做的宝贵贡献。我要特别感谢微生物生态学家Jake M. Robinson博士作为顾问和工作室联合顾问所做的工作,以及我在挪威生命科学大学的研究助理Flora kiezling和Florian Opitz。这项工作是由挪威研究委员会“弹性空间”项目资助的。注1 Sonja dmpelmann, Seeing Trees: A History of Street Trees in New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019), 21-42.2随着工业化的发展,柏林住房的快速增长是由英国工程师James Hobrecht构建的,他引入了下水道网络的布局,作为城市形式的电导乔安娜·迪恩,“看到树木,思考森林:20世纪60年代多伦多大学的城市林业”,见:Alan Mac-Eachern和William J. Turkel(主编),加拿大环境史的方法和意义(多伦多:Nelson, 2009)迪特尔·亨内波,园林和景观历史学家,1970,见:德·<s:1>佩尔曼,《看树》,同上(注1)Lara a . Roman和Frederick N. Scatena,“街道树木存活率:先前研究的meta分析和应用于美国费城的实地调查”,城市林业和城市绿化10(2011),269-274.7。Samuli Helama等人,“利用树木年轮和气候记录探索赫尔辛基城市松树的死亡率”,树木26 (2012),353-362;Ian A. Smith, Victoria K. Dearborn和Lucy R. Hutyra。“活得快,死得早:行道树的加速生长、死亡率和周转率”,《公共科学图书馆·综合》第14期(2019)10 . Ingo Kowarik,“城市与荒野:一个新的视角”,《国际荒野杂志》19/3 (2013),32-36.9Matthew Gandy,“无意识的景观”,景观研究41/4 (2016),433-440.11 Peter Del Tredici,“自发的城市植被:全球化世界变化的反映”,自然与文化10 (2010),12电影导演:马修·甘迪(英国和德国,2017),72分钟,彩色;Matthew Gandy(编),Natura Urbana: The Brachen of Berlin,随DVD出版的文集,Susanne Hauser等人(2019)的贡献,naturaurbana.org.13。Gavid Gissen, Subnature: Architecture’s Other Environments(纽约:普林斯顿建筑出版社,2009)玛丽·道格拉斯,《纯洁与危险:污染与禁忌概念分析》(纽约:ARK版,1966)甘迪,《无意的风景》,同上(注10)17 .吉尔斯·克莱门茨,“第三景观”,TEH系列新想象#3,跨欧洲Halles (2003)Anita Bakshi和Frank Gallagher,“与第四自然的设计”,Journal of Landscape Architecture 15/2 (2020), 24-35.18 Kevin J. Beiler, Susan W. Simard和Daniel M. Durall,“Weric和Mesic Douglas-fir森林中树-菌根真菌相互作用网络的拓扑结构”,Journal of Ecology 103/3 (2015), 616-628.19 David H. McNear Jr .,“根圈:根、土壤和两者之间的一切”,Nature Education Knowledge 4/3(2013), 1。 20查尔斯·泰勒,《自我的来源:现代身份的形成》(剑桥,马萨诸塞州:哈佛大学出版社,1989),第21页Scott Gilbert, Jan Sapp和Alfred Tauber,“生命的共生观点:我们从来都不是个体”,生物学季刊评论87/4 (2012),325-341.22 Alfred I. Tauber,“免疫系统及其生态学”,科学哲学75/2 (2008),224-245.23 Witoon Purahong等人,“菌根和木栖大型真菌的城市生活:城市地区对维持真菌生物多样性的重要性”,景观和城市规划221 (2022).24Michael Bonkowski, Cecile Villenave和Bryan Griffiths,“根际动物:土壤动物与植物根系密切相互作用的功能和结构多样性”,Plant Soil 321 (2009), 213-233.25 Kevin Beiler等人,“木材网络的架构:根状孢子虫的基因连接多个道格拉斯-fir群”,New phyologist 185 (2010), 543-553.26 Ferris Jabr,“森林的社会生活”,纽约时报,2020年12月3日“寻找母亲树”;《对苏珊娜·西马德的采访》,Emergence杂志,2022年10月26日,emergencemagazine.org/podcast/, 65分钟。28 Lynn Margulis,《早期生活》(Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 1982)梅林·谢德拉克,《纠缠的生命》(纽约:兰登书屋,2020年)GEFA产品描述,gefafabritz.com/products/private-garden/endo-mycorrhiza-foliage-tree.html.31 Mark Nieuwenhuijsen等。《五十度绿:“健康城市生活之路”,流行病学28/1 (2017),63-71.32 Takeshi Ichinohe, Iris K. Pang和Yosuke Kumamoto,“微生物群调节呼吸道甲型流感病毒感染的免疫防御”,PNAS 108/13 (2011), 5354-5359.33 Jessica Stanhope, Mart
{"title":"Deliberate and less intentional urban forests","authors":"Jorg Sieweke","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2023.2258726","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2258726","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe term ‘urban forest’ is an oxymoron and continues to provoke a staggering set of questions. The default practice of transplanting cloned saplings from nurseries into the city holds little promise of adding up to more than the sum of its destressed trees. In contrast, there is growing recognition of the unsanctioned emergent forest vegetation of urban fallows. While the fields of cultural geography and urban ecology recognize such unintentional urban forests for their layered sociocultural, ecological and health benefits, city administrators, the general public and even landscape architects have been slower to embrace them. However, consequences of global warming and the subsequent rise of urban ecology mandates an update regarding current challenges and potentials in managing urban forests. Park projects can expand the normative canon by embracing recent urban ecology concepts concerning spontaneous vegetation on fallow urban land, such as ‘ruderal’ and ‘fourth nature’. This paper critically reviews traditional notions of urban forestry and refutes the single tree planting approach. It questions standardized connotations and nativist biases towards invasive species and argues that spontaneous vegetation is well equipped to provide and expand critical networks to more resilient and enduring urban forest patches. It explores cases in Germany, in general, and Berlin, in particular, to ground the relevance for emergent vegetation. It considers the acknowledgment and utilization of recent developments in forestry science regarding microbial ecology, including the mycorrhizal and symbiotic macro/micro networks, important for landscape architecture and necessary to propose more resilient and healthy forested urban environments.Keywords: urban ecologymyceliumwood-wide-webmicrobiomeholobiont AcknowledgmentsI would like to thank professor Kelly Shannon for her invaluable contribution in the editing process. My special thanks go to Dr Jake M. Robinson, microbial ecologist, for his work as consultant and studio co-advisor, and my research assistants Flora Kießling and Florian Opitz at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences. The work was funded through the Norwegian Research Council, project “spaces for resilience”.Notes1 Sonja Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees: A History of Street Trees in New York City and Berlin (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2019), 21–42.2 Berlin’s rapid increase in housing along with the growth of industrialization was structured by British engineer James Hobrecht, who introduced the layout of the sewer network as the armature for urban form.3 Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees, op. cit. (note 1), 2.4 Joanna Dean, ‘Seeing Trees, Thinking Forests: Urban Forestry at the University of Toronto in the 1960s’, in: Alan Mac-Eachern and William J. Turkel (eds.), Method and Meaning in Canadian Environmental History (Toronto: Nelson, 2009).5 Dieter Hennebo, Garden and landscape historian, 1970, in: Dümpelmann, Seeing Trees, op. cit. (note 1).6 Lara","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"273 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/18626033.2023.2258729
Kamni Gill
trees. There have been sociological perspectives, histories of particular species or tree types, and anthropological studies of tree relationships. There have been ecological texts that make trees part of a sentient, ecological network, and technical accounts that quantify the contribution of trees to climate change. Ricardo Devesa’s contribution to the expanding oeuvre of tree books examines the spatial relationships created between a house and its trees. In Outdoor Domesticity: On the Relationships between Trees, Architecture and Its Inhabitants, he explores how trees are an agent of culture, defining new patterns of domestic life. Five case studies of twentieth-century European houses constitute the book’s core chapters. These are copiously illustrated with archival drawings and photographs of the trees and houses. Trees are important site elements that each architect has incorporated into their design work in a distinctive way and to distinctive effect. The book begins with the existing olive, carab and pine trees that marked the site of Bernard Rudofsky’s Mediterranean house, La Casa, constructed between 1969 and 1972. Devesa uses the house to elucidate a relationship between trees and people that finds its form in the framing of the tree by openings in the walls or the casting of shadows on smooth surfaces. Rudofsky’s prolific writing shows that trees precede architecture in defining places. For Rudofsky, ‘trees are among the most inviting, not to say poetic of ready-made domiciles’ (p. 83). He acknowledges their potency through a continuum of spaces marked by modest acts of outdoor inhabitation in both the design of La Casa and in his drawings for other houses. One, for example, shows how two trees and a blanket spread on the ground beneath them constitute a leafy enclave that is repeated in an inner courtyard marked by another tree. The tree is a visual and structural object that creates a domestic life under the canopy of trees. Next come the birch trees that form arboreal screens to Marcel Breuer’s Caesar Cottage (1951–1952). Existing trees on the site are foreground, then background to the house, forming a series of frames and backdrops. Devesa interweaves landscape and the contemporary discourse on the relationship of building with a careful reading of Breuer’s own writings—indeed one of his criteria for including particular cases in the book was the existence of a given architect’s own texts on the subject. For Breuer, trees formed part of an existing natural landscape that should influence the form of a house. This modern impulse to connect the exterior landscape to the interior of a house through trees and topography was also expressed in a seminal MOMA exhibition, Built in the USA: Post War Architecture, which included Caesar Cottage. Surprisingly, Devesa does not extend his analysis to Breuer’s various collaborations with Dan Kiley, whose use of trees in shaping the exterior life of buildings was equally striking. Devesa contends
{"title":"Outdoor Domesticity On the Relationships between Trees, Architecture and InhabitantsOutdoor Domesticity On the Relationships between Trees, Architecture and Inhabitants, Ricardo Devesa, ISBN: 978 1 948765 71 8, New York and Barcelona: Actar, 2021, 325 pp., illustrated, € 32.00 (hardcover)","authors":"Kamni Gill","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2023.2258729","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2258729","url":null,"abstract":"trees. There have been sociological perspectives, histories of particular species or tree types, and anthropological studies of tree relationships. There have been ecological texts that make trees part of a sentient, ecological network, and technical accounts that quantify the contribution of trees to climate change. Ricardo Devesa’s contribution to the expanding oeuvre of tree books examines the spatial relationships created between a house and its trees. In Outdoor Domesticity: On the Relationships between Trees, Architecture and Its Inhabitants, he explores how trees are an agent of culture, defining new patterns of domestic life. Five case studies of twentieth-century European houses constitute the book’s core chapters. These are copiously illustrated with archival drawings and photographs of the trees and houses. Trees are important site elements that each architect has incorporated into their design work in a distinctive way and to distinctive effect. The book begins with the existing olive, carab and pine trees that marked the site of Bernard Rudofsky’s Mediterranean house, La Casa, constructed between 1969 and 1972. Devesa uses the house to elucidate a relationship between trees and people that finds its form in the framing of the tree by openings in the walls or the casting of shadows on smooth surfaces. Rudofsky’s prolific writing shows that trees precede architecture in defining places. For Rudofsky, ‘trees are among the most inviting, not to say poetic of ready-made domiciles’ (p. 83). He acknowledges their potency through a continuum of spaces marked by modest acts of outdoor inhabitation in both the design of La Casa and in his drawings for other houses. One, for example, shows how two trees and a blanket spread on the ground beneath them constitute a leafy enclave that is repeated in an inner courtyard marked by another tree. The tree is a visual and structural object that creates a domestic life under the canopy of trees. Next come the birch trees that form arboreal screens to Marcel Breuer’s Caesar Cottage (1951–1952). Existing trees on the site are foreground, then background to the house, forming a series of frames and backdrops. Devesa interweaves landscape and the contemporary discourse on the relationship of building with a careful reading of Breuer’s own writings—indeed one of his criteria for including particular cases in the book was the existence of a given architect’s own texts on the subject. For Breuer, trees formed part of an existing natural landscape that should influence the form of a house. This modern impulse to connect the exterior landscape to the interior of a house through trees and topography was also expressed in a seminal MOMA exhibition, Built in the USA: Post War Architecture, which included Caesar Cottage. Surprisingly, Devesa does not extend his analysis to Breuer’s various collaborations with Dan Kiley, whose use of trees in shaping the exterior life of buildings was equally striking. Devesa contends","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"176 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/18626033.2023.2258728
Brent Greene, Wendy Walls
Abstract This article considers the potential of Fourth Nature urban forestry tactics at Birrarung Marr—the City of Melbourne’s largest open space contribution in over 100 years—as a speculative planting and maintenance strategy for adapting to excessive heat and drought. This paper is structured in three parts. The first section briefly discusses the theoretical and adaptation qualities of spontaneous planting practices, such as Kowarik’s Fourth Nature philosophy, and its impact on the design and maintenance of Natur-Park Schöneberger Südgelände (Berlin). The second part introduces the designed landscape of Birrarung Marr and provides an overview of its evolving planting strategies and urban forest since 2002. It analyses how climate change, municipal policy and recent planting designs such as the Woody Meadow insertion have impacted—and continue to impact—changes to the park’s forest. Lastly, part three utilizes Schöneberger Südgelände as a reference to speculate on future planting design approaches and climate adaptation tactics for Birrarung Marr as the City of Melbourne seeks new design responses to predicted urban heating.
摘要本文考虑了墨尔本100多年来最大的开放空间贡献——Birrarung marr的第四自然城市林业策略的潜力,作为一种适应过热和干旱的投机性种植和维护策略。本文的结构分为三个部分。第一部分简要讨论了自发种植实践的理论和适应性,例如Kowarik的第四自然哲学,以及它对自然公园Schöneberger Südgelände(柏林)的设计和维护的影响。第二部分介绍了Birrarung Marr的设计景观,并概述了自2002年以来其不断发展的种植策略和城市森林。它分析了气候变化、市政政策和最近的种植设计(如伍迪草甸的插入)如何影响并继续影响公园森林的变化。最后,第三部分利用Schöneberger Südgelände作为参考,推测Birrarung Marr未来的种植设计方法和气候适应策略,因为墨尔本市正在寻求新的设计应对预测的城市供暖。关键词:景观建筑、城市森林、第四自然、全球变暖、种植设计注1瓦尔德海姆解释说,在这几十年里,设计师和理论家“阐明了生态系统被视为自组织和开放式的潜力,同时为城市干预提供了一个战略框架”。查尔斯·瓦尔德海姆,景观作为城市主义:一般理论(普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社,2016),32.2这些主题在新千年中继续被探索。参见:Peter Del Tredici,“自发的城市植被:全球化世界变化的反映”,《自然与文化》5(2010),第399 - 315.3。关于克莱姆萨蒙的理论及其对他的种植设计方法的影响的概述,参见:alessandro Rocca,行星花园:吉尔斯·克莱姆萨蒙的景观建筑(巴塞尔:Birkhäuser, 2008)Derborence岛的植物位于7米高的高原上,这使得废弃的植物设计能够进化(并适应)更广泛的景观系统Ingo Kowarik,“城市与荒野:一个新的视角”,《国际荒野杂志》第19期(2013),32-36.6页。正如Kowarik解释的那样,“几乎每个人都很清楚”,第四自然“在新的规划和建筑方案中被考虑”,“景观设计师被训练将这种类型的自然包括在他们的设计中”。2014年10月6日,Ingo Kowarik采访Brent Greene。第四自然设计方法的例子在Park am Gleisdreieck, Park am Nordbahnhof和NaturPark Schöneberger Südgelände.7都很明显2014年10月6日,Ingo Kowarik采访Brent Greene。Kowarik的理论得到了20世纪70年代生态学研究的支持,该研究研究了柏林荒地上自发植物的适应潜力。参见:Herbert Sukopp, Hans-Peter Blume和Wolfram Kunick,“柏林荒地的土壤,植物群和植被”,见:Ian C. Laurie(编),城市中的自然:城市绿地设计和开发中的自然环境(奇切斯特和纽约:Wiley, 1979), 115-131: 121.8埃德娜·沃林,澳大利亚路边(牛津:牛津大学出版社,1952)10 .贝蒂·马洛尼和吉恩·沃克,《设计澳大利亚丛林花园》(悉尼:霍维茨出版社,1966)参见:Catherine Jane Bull,《与旧景观的新对话:当代澳大利亚的景观建筑》(Victoria Mulgrave: Images Publishing Group, 2002);布鲁斯·麦肯齐,《景观设计:澳大利亚》(悉尼:布鲁斯·麦肯齐设计,2011);凯特·赫德和杰拉·伊万科维奇-沃特斯,《本土:澳大利亚植物的艺术与设计》(墨尔本港,维多利亚:澳大利亚泰晤士和哈德逊,2017年);朱利安·拉克斯沃西,《杂草丛生:景观建筑与园艺之间的实践》(剑桥,马萨诸塞州:麻省理工学院出版社,2018)。尽管缺乏理论基础,但这些文献仍然在澳大利亚本土和本土植物的范围内,松散地参考了自发种植方法Timothy J. Entwisle, Chris Cole和Peter Symes,“适应墨尔本花园(维多利亚皇家植物园)的植物景观以应对气候变化”,植物多样性39/6(2017),338-347:339.12。大自然保护协会和弹性墨尔本,生活墨尔本:我们的都市城市森林(2019),livingmelbourne.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Strategy_online。pdf。最近通过设计解决气候缓解和热适应性问题的本地种植试验仅限于实验展示,尚未影响景观建筑实践。参见:Hui-Anne Tan等人,“设计和管理生物多样性街景:来自墨尔本市的关键经验”,城市生态系统25/3(2022),733-740.13。 14参见:Jens Lachmund,《绿化柏林:科学、政治和城市自然的共同生产》(剑桥,马萨诸塞州:麻省理工学院出版社,2013年),详细概述了柏林新生态观念的发展。15 Linda N. Groat和David Wang,《建筑研究方法》(霍博肯,新泽西州:John Wiley and Sons出版社,2013年)Joseph Pearson,柏林(伦敦:Reaktion Books, 2017), 89.17 Jouni Häkli,“城市中自然的文化和政治:柏林“绿楔”的案例”,资本主义,自然,社会主义7/2 (1996),125-138:137.18 Ingo Kowarik和Andreas Langer,“自然公园Südgelände:在柏林一个废弃的铁路场连接保护和娱乐”,in: Ingo Kowarik和Stefan Körnern(编辑),野生城市林地:城市林业的新视角(柏林,Springer-Verlag, 2005), 287-299:288-290.19 Lachmund,绿化柏林,同上(注14),172.20 Kowarik和Langer,“自然公园Südgelände”,同上(注18),291.21 Ingo Kowarik采访Brent Greene, 2014年10月6日。Kowarik和Langer,“自然公园Südgelände”,同上(注18),291.23 Lucia Grosse-Bächle,“介入和离开空间之间的策略”,in: Kowarik和Körnern,野生城市林地,同上(注18),231-246;243.24 Daniel Fenner等人,“德国柏林和波茨坦的热浪——1893年至2017年热浪定义的长期趋势和比较”,《国际气候学杂志》39/4 (2019),2422-2437:2434.25 Robert Vautard等人,“人类对西欧2019年6月和7月热浪破纪录的贡献”,《环境研究快报》15/9(2020),1.26与gr<s:1>柏林个人通信,2023年1月24日。gr<s:1> n Berlin是一家柏林国有景观开发和管理公司。grn柏林不灌溉自然或景观保护区Schöneberger Südgelände也储存碳并调节气候。参见:Kees Lokman,“空置作为实验室:在空置的城市土地上重新构想社会生态系统的设计标准”,景观研究42/7 (2017),728-746:743.28
{"title":"Wood for the trees: Design and policymaking of urban forests in Berlin and Melbourne","authors":"Brent Greene, Wendy Walls","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2023.2258728","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2258728","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article considers the potential of Fourth Nature urban forestry tactics at Birrarung Marr—the City of Melbourne’s largest open space contribution in over 100 years—as a speculative planting and maintenance strategy for adapting to excessive heat and drought. This paper is structured in three parts. The first section briefly discusses the theoretical and adaptation qualities of spontaneous planting practices, such as Kowarik’s Fourth Nature philosophy, and its impact on the design and maintenance of Natur-Park Schöneberger Südgelände (Berlin). The second part introduces the designed landscape of Birrarung Marr and provides an overview of its evolving planting strategies and urban forest since 2002. It analyses how climate change, municipal policy and recent planting designs such as the Woody Meadow insertion have impacted—and continue to impact—changes to the park’s forest. Lastly, part three utilizes Schöneberger Südgelände as a reference to speculate on future planting design approaches and climate adaptation tactics for Birrarung Marr as the City of Melbourne seeks new design responses to predicted urban heating.","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799203","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/18626033.2023.2259653
Max R. Piana, Nicholas Pevzner, Richard A. Hallett
AbstractForests in cities, from remnant woodlands to designed natural areas, are common and abundant. Ecologically similar to rural forests, these landscapes lend themselves to the principles of traditional forest management, such as silviculture. But the application of silviculture to forests in cities, at least in the United States, has long been met with resistance: as far back as Olmsted’s Central Park experiments with ‘planting thick and thinning quick’, public sentiment has been protective of trees, even when forest health would have benefitted from such treatments. Urban silviculture is a conceptual framework and a renewed call for a systematic approach to managing forests in cities that addresses cities’ socioecological context through adapted practices that integrate other disciplines, including design. Using emerging science and case studies, we explore how silviculture and landscape architecture, two allied yet often-alienated disciplines, can engage to create socially responsive evidence-based approaches that enhance the design, management and resilience of forested landscapes in cities.Keyword: forests in citiesurban silvicultureadaptive managementlandscape architectureecological designurban afforestation AcknowledgmentsWe thank the organizers of the Urban Forests, Forest Urbanisms, and Global Warming conference at KU Leuven, as well as Morgan Grove and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier versions of this paper.The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or US Government determination or policy.The work of Max R. Piana and Richard A. Hallett was authored as part of their official duties as Employees of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 USC. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under US Law. Nicholas Pevzner hereby waives their right to assert copyright, but not their right to be named as co-author in the article.Notes1 Roxi Thoren, ‘Deep Roots: Foundations of Forestry in American Landscape Architecture’, Scenario Journal (Spring 2014), scenariojournal.com/article/deep-roots/.2 Frederick L. Olmsted correspondence to Henry G. Stebbins, 1 February 1876, in: Charles E. Beveridge et al. (eds.), The Papers of Frederick Law Olmsted, Vol. VII: Parks, Politics, and Patronage, 1874–1882 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007), 175–176.3 Frederick L. Olmsted and Jonathan Baxter Harrison, Observations on the Treatment of Public Plantations, More Especially Relating to the Use of the Axe (Boston: T.R. Marvin & Son, 1889).4 Charles Spague Sargent, ‘Mr. Vanderbilt’s Forest’, Garden and Forest 8 (21 February 1894), 71.5 Max R. Piana, Clara C. Pregitzer and Richard A. Hallett, ‘Advancing Management of Urban Forested Natural Areas: Toward an Urban Silviculture?’, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 19/9 (2021), 526–535.6 Cecil C. Kon
摘要城市森林,从残存林地到设计的自然区域,都是普遍而丰富的。这些景观在生态上与农村森林相似,适合传统的森林管理原则,例如造林。但是,至少在美国,将造林技术应用于城市森林长期以来一直受到抵制:早在奥姆斯特德的中央公园进行的“种植茂密,迅速间伐”的实验中,公众的情绪就已经保护了树木,即使这样的处理会使森林健康受益。城市森林栽培是一个概念性框架,也是对系统化城市森林管理方法的再次呼吁,通过整合包括设计在内的其他学科的适应性实践来解决城市的社会生态背景。利用新兴科学和案例研究,我们探索了森林文化和景观建筑这两个相互关联但往往相互疏离的学科如何能够相互作用,创造出对社会有响应的循证方法,从而增强城市森林景观的设计、管理和复原力。感谢鲁汶大学“城市森林、森林城市化和全球变暖”会议的组织者,以及Morgan Grove和三位匿名审稿人对本文早期版本的评论。本出版物中的发现和结论是作者的发现和结论,不应被解释为代表任何美国农业部或美国政府的官方决定或政策。Max R. Piana和Richard a . Hallett的工作是作为美国政府雇员的官方职责的一部分而撰写的,因此是美国政府的工作。根据17 USC。根据美国法律,此类作品不受版权保护。Nicholas Pevzner特此放弃他们主张版权的权利,但不是他们在文章中被命名为合著者的权利。注1 Roxi Thoren,“深根:美国景观建筑中的林业基础”,Scenario Journal(2014年春季),scenariojournal.com/article/deep-roots/.2 Frederick L. Olmsted与Henry G. Stebbins的通信,1876年2月1日,in: Charles E. Beveridge等人(编辑),Frederick Law Olmsted的论文,卷七:公园,政治和赞助,1874-1882(巴尔的摩:3 .约翰·霍普金斯大学出版社,2007),175-176.3弗雷德里克·l·奥姆斯特德和乔纳森·巴克斯特·哈里森,《对公共种植园处理的观察,尤其是与斧头的使用有关的观察》(波士顿:T.R.马文和儿子出版社,1889)查尔斯·斯普格·萨金特先生。《范德比尔特的森林》,《花园与森林》8(1894年2月21日),71.5 Max R. Piana, Clara C. Pregitzer和Richard A. Hallett,《推进城市森林自然区域的管理:走向城市森林文化?》,《生态与环境前沿》19/9 (2021),526-535.6 Cecil C. Konijnendijk等人,“定义城市林业:北美和欧洲的比较视角”,《城市林业与城市绿化》4/3-4 (2006),93-103.7 Piana, Pregitzer和Hallett,《推进管理》,同上(注5)Peter Harnik, Charlie McCabe和Alexandra Hiple, 2017城市公园事实(旧金山:公共土地信托,2017),tpl.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CityParkFacts_2017.4_7_17.FIN_.LO_.pdf.9 Teresa Mexia等人,“生态系统服务:“放大镜下的城市公园”,环境研究160 (2018),469-478.10 Clara C. Pregitzer等人,“估算纽约市城市森林的碳储量”,城市生态系统25 (2022),617-631.11 Christopher a . Lepczyk等人,“城市生物多样性:理解生物多样性保护的城市绿地生态的基本问题”,生物科学67/9 (2017),799-807.12 D. S. Novem Auyeung等人,“阅读景观:Alexander J. Felson, Emily E. Oldfield和Mark A. Bradford,“让生态学家参与塑造大型绿色基础设施项目”,《生物科学》63/11(2013),882-890.14最近的城市生态学研究强调了城市森林长期和可持续管理的重要性,例如:Brady L. Simmons et al.,“城市公园森林恢复的长期结果”,恢复生态学24/1 (2016),109-118;Mark S. Ashton和Matthew J. Kelty,《造林实践:应用森林生态学》(Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2018).16Piana, Pregitzer和Hallett,“推进管理”,同上(注5)同前。
{"title":"Beyond the axe: Interdisciplinary approaches towards an urban silviculture","authors":"Max R. Piana, Nicholas Pevzner, Richard A. Hallett","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2023.2259653","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2259653","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractForests in cities, from remnant woodlands to designed natural areas, are common and abundant. Ecologically similar to rural forests, these landscapes lend themselves to the principles of traditional forest management, such as silviculture. But the application of silviculture to forests in cities, at least in the United States, has long been met with resistance: as far back as Olmsted’s Central Park experiments with ‘planting thick and thinning quick’, public sentiment has been protective of trees, even when forest health would have benefitted from such treatments. Urban silviculture is a conceptual framework and a renewed call for a systematic approach to managing forests in cities that addresses cities’ socioecological context through adapted practices that integrate other disciplines, including design. Using emerging science and case studies, we explore how silviculture and landscape architecture, two allied yet often-alienated disciplines, can engage to create socially responsive evidence-based approaches that enhance the design, management and resilience of forested landscapes in cities.Keyword: forests in citiesurban silvicultureadaptive managementlandscape architectureecological designurban afforestation AcknowledgmentsWe thank the organizers of the Urban Forests, Forest Urbanisms, and Global Warming conference at KU Leuven, as well as Morgan Grove and three anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier versions of this paper.The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or US Government determination or policy.The work of Max R. Piana and Richard A. Hallett was authored as part of their official duties as Employees of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 USC. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under US Law. Nicholas Pevzner hereby waives their right to assert copyright, but not their right to be named as co-author in the article.Notes1 Roxi Thoren, ‘Deep Roots: Foundations of Forestry in American Landscape Architecture’, Scenario Journal (Spring 2014), scenariojournal.com/article/deep-roots/.2 Frederick L. Olmsted correspondence to Henry G. Stebbins, 1 February 1876, in: Charles E. Beveridge et al. (eds.), The Papers of Frederick Law Olmsted, Vol. VII: Parks, Politics, and Patronage, 1874–1882 (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007), 175–176.3 Frederick L. Olmsted and Jonathan Baxter Harrison, Observations on the Treatment of Public Plantations, More Especially Relating to the Use of the Axe (Boston: T.R. Marvin & Son, 1889).4 Charles Spague Sargent, ‘Mr. Vanderbilt’s Forest’, Garden and Forest 8 (21 February 1894), 71.5 Max R. Piana, Clara C. Pregitzer and Richard A. Hallett, ‘Advancing Management of Urban Forested Natural Areas: Toward an Urban Silviculture?’, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 19/9 (2021), 526–535.6 Cecil C. Kon","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799198","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-01-02DOI: 10.1080/18626033.2023.2258722
Zeba Amir, Bruno De Meulder
AbstractThe paper explores how the nomadic community of Van Gujjars are engaged in reproductions of forest-based settlement forms and construction of the Himalayan landscape through contestation and adaptation of State Forest policies. The paper first elaborates on the traditional settlement system of khols in the Shivalik forests, to better understand the Van Gujjars’ relationship with the landscape. Secondly, the paper examines resettlement of the community from the Rajaji National Park (RNP). Two case studies, of the Kunau Chaud and Gaindikhata resettlement sites, demonstrate the adaptive capacities of site-based systems against the sociocultural inadequacies of top-down planning. The paper attempts to foreground the case as an archetype of forest urbanism. Forest urbanism, which iterates between landscape urbanism and urban forestry, focuses on settlement and nature entanglements and the role of forests in structuring the environment. Instead of stereotyping traditional settling systems as backwards, and in line with David Graeber and David Wengrow’s perspective on humanity,1 the forest urbanism of the Van Guijars’ mode of settling is seen as an intriguing gaze into an inspirational world of possibilities.Keywords: Van GujjarsHimalayaforestry policyforest urbanismglobal warming AcknowledgmentsThis case study was first presented at the ‘Urban Forests, Forest Urbanisms & Global Warming’ conference, held at the KU Leuven in June 2022. The Interfaculty Council for Development Co-operation (IRO) Doctoral Scholarships at the KU Leuven supported this research. Kelly Shannon incessantly supports and contributes to this research project. Last but not least, the authors thank the Van Gujjar community, the Van Gujjar Tribal Yuva Sangathan (Tribal Youth Coalition) and the NGO Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra for their openness and kind help.Notes1 David Graeber and David Wengrow, The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity (London: Penguin UK, 2021).2 Ritesh Joshi, ‘Eco-tourism as a Viable Option for Wildlife Conservation: Need for Policy Initiative in Rajaji National Park, North-West India’, Global Journal of Human Social Science Research 10/5 (2010), 19–30.3 Pernille Gooch, ‘The Persistent Forest Pastoralists’, Nomadic Peoples 8/2 (2004), 126.4 Paulo Tavares, ‘In the Forest Ruins’, in: Beatriz Colomina et al. (eds.), Superhumanity: Design of the Self (Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 2017), 20–35.5 James C. Scott, ‘Nature and Space’ and ‘Cities, People, and Language’, in: James C. Scott, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2020).6 Richard Haeuber, ‘Indian Forestry Policies in Two Eras: Continuity or Change?’, Environmental History Review 17/1 (1993), 49–76.7 Mahesh Rangrajan and Ghazala Shahabuddin, ‘Displacement and Relocation from Protected Areas: Towards a Biological and Historical Synthesis’, Conservation and Society 4/3 (2006), 359–378.8
20 Ramachandra Guha,不安的森林:喜马拉雅山的生态变化和农民抵抗(伯克利和洛杉矶/牛津:加州大学出版社/牛津大学出版社,1989)1921年,Van gujjar人每年的放牧费是每头水牛2卢比,每头母牛1卢比。对于当地村民来说,每头水牛12安纳纳,每头奶牛6安纳纳。1卢比等于16阿纳斯邓瓦尔,《失去的流动性》,同上(注21),第23页Pernille Gooch,“作为森林居民的保护或权利的受害者:Van Gujjar牧民之间的法律竞争”,《保护与社会》7/4(2009),239-248。注:社区是穆斯林,而北阿坎德邦主要是印度教徒。24詹姆斯·c·斯科特,“野蛮人的黄金时代”,见:詹姆斯·c·斯科特,反对粮食:早期国家的深刻历史(纽黑文:耶鲁大学出版社,2017),219-256.25 Uttar Pradesh (UP)是北阿坎德邦的本邦。2000年11月9日,各邦行政部门分离。26 Jeet Singh,“北阿坎德邦的森林公地和农村自给经济”,拉吉夫·甘地当代研究所,rgics.org/wp-content/uploads/Forest-Commons-in-Uttarakhand-and-Subsistence-Rural-Economy-A-Study-of-Two-Panchayats.pdf,见2021年12月21日;哈伯,“印度林业”,同上(注8).27Vivek Menon, P. S. Easa和A. J. T . Johnsingh(编),让路:保护拉贾吉国家公园大象的奇拉-摩蒂彻尔走廊(新德里:印度野生动物信托基金会,2003),6。偶尔报告编号10,由印度野生动物信托基金与国际动物福利基金会、Doon协会之友、北阿坎恰尔森林部、美国鱼类和野生动物管理局以及印度野生动物研究所合作开展。28在古吉拉特邦Go Kaarj期间的“生态和与森林的关系”会议上讨论了这个问题。由畜牧中心和Van Gujjar部落Yuva Sangathan主办的“轻松生活和展览”,2022年3月24日至26日,其中一位作者参加阿图罗·埃斯科瓦尔:《遭遇发展:第三世界的形成与毁灭》(普林斯顿:普林斯顿大学出版社,1995),第30页古斯塔夫Cederlöf,《在森林权利的丛林中:与Van Gujjars、喜马拉雅活动家和森林权利法案的109天》(孟加拉国:Svalorna, 2012), 31诺拉·西尔凡德《为谁进行领土清洗》Bosawas生物圈保护区的土著权利、保护和国家领土化,尼加拉瓜,Geoforum 121 (2021), 23-32;斯科特,《自然》与《城市与人》,同上(注7).32Rubina Nusrat,“喜马拉雅牧民的边缘化和被排除在传统栖息地之外——以印度Van Gujjars为例”,《国际人类发展与可持续发展杂志》(2011)第4期,93-103;古奇,《持久者》,同上(注4),第34页菲利普·德斯科拉,《野生与驯化》,见:德斯科拉,《超越自然》,同上(注11),32-53.35彼得·克鲁波特金,《互助:进化的一个因素》(纽约:麦克卢尔·菲利普斯公司,1902年)Paul-Henri Chombard de Lauwe,“抱负,图像引导和社会变革”,法国社会评论V(1964), 180-192。zeba Amir是鲁汶大学ICoU建筑与城市主义研究小组(OSA)的博士研究员。她的博士研究重点是喜马拉雅地区人类、森林和农业的相互关系。她拥有城市主义和战略规划硕士学位,并通过专业和学术项目从事景观城市主义研究。Bruno De Meulder是鲁汶大学城市规划学教授。他的研究处于后殖民和后工业背景下的空间分析和城市设计的交叉点。
{"title":"Contested forests: The Van Gujjars' struggle to settle","authors":"Zeba Amir, Bruno De Meulder","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2023.2258722","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2258722","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe paper explores how the nomadic community of Van Gujjars are engaged in reproductions of forest-based settlement forms and construction of the Himalayan landscape through contestation and adaptation of State Forest policies. The paper first elaborates on the traditional settlement system of khols in the Shivalik forests, to better understand the Van Gujjars’ relationship with the landscape. Secondly, the paper examines resettlement of the community from the Rajaji National Park (RNP). Two case studies, of the Kunau Chaud and Gaindikhata resettlement sites, demonstrate the adaptive capacities of site-based systems against the sociocultural inadequacies of top-down planning. The paper attempts to foreground the case as an archetype of forest urbanism. Forest urbanism, which iterates between landscape urbanism and urban forestry, focuses on settlement and nature entanglements and the role of forests in structuring the environment. Instead of stereotyping traditional settling systems as backwards, and in line with David Graeber and David Wengrow’s perspective on humanity,1 the forest urbanism of the Van Guijars’ mode of settling is seen as an intriguing gaze into an inspirational world of possibilities.Keywords: Van GujjarsHimalayaforestry policyforest urbanismglobal warming AcknowledgmentsThis case study was first presented at the ‘Urban Forests, Forest Urbanisms & Global Warming’ conference, held at the KU Leuven in June 2022. The Interfaculty Council for Development Co-operation (IRO) Doctoral Scholarships at the KU Leuven supported this research. Kelly Shannon incessantly supports and contributes to this research project. Last but not least, the authors thank the Van Gujjar community, the Van Gujjar Tribal Yuva Sangathan (Tribal Youth Coalition) and the NGO Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra for their openness and kind help.Notes1 David Graeber and David Wengrow, The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity (London: Penguin UK, 2021).2 Ritesh Joshi, ‘Eco-tourism as a Viable Option for Wildlife Conservation: Need for Policy Initiative in Rajaji National Park, North-West India’, Global Journal of Human Social Science Research 10/5 (2010), 19–30.3 Pernille Gooch, ‘The Persistent Forest Pastoralists’, Nomadic Peoples 8/2 (2004), 126.4 Paulo Tavares, ‘In the Forest Ruins’, in: Beatriz Colomina et al. (eds.), Superhumanity: Design of the Self (Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 2017), 20–35.5 James C. Scott, ‘Nature and Space’ and ‘Cities, People, and Language’, in: James C. Scott, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2020).6 Richard Haeuber, ‘Indian Forestry Policies in Two Eras: Continuity or Change?’, Environmental History Review 17/1 (1993), 49–76.7 Mahesh Rangrajan and Ghazala Shahabuddin, ‘Displacement and Relocation from Protected Areas: Towards a Biological and Historical Synthesis’, Conservation and Society 4/3 (2006), 359–378.8 ","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Forests in the city, a new paradigm?","authors":"Anaïs Leger-Smith, Ursula Wieser Benedetti, Maria Hellström-Reimer, Sonia Keravel, Francisca Lima, Usue Ruiz Arana, Burcu Yiğit-Turan","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2023.2258718","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2023.2258718","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135799202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}